Next Article in Journal
A Brief History of Whakapapa: Māori Approaches to Genealogy
Previous Article in Journal
From a Christian World Community to a Christian America: Ecumenical Protestant Internationalism as a Source of Christian Nationalist Renewal
Open AccessArticle

Artificial and Unconscious Selection in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned Pill of the Lamarckian Reading

Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Brock University, Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada
Genealogy 2019, 3(2), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020031
Received: 15 April 2019 / Revised: 24 May 2019 / Accepted: 11 June 2019 / Published: 13 June 2019
I examine three kinds of criticism directed at philosophical genealogy. I call these substantive, performative, and semantic. I turn my attention to a particular substantive criticism that one may launch against essay two of On the Genealogy of Morals that turns on how Nietzsche answers “the time-crunch problem”. On the surface, there is evidence to suggest that Nietzsche accepts a false scientific theory, namely, Lamarck’s Inheritability Thesis, in order to account for the growth of a new human “organ”—morality. I demonstrate that the passages interpreted by some scholars to prove that Nietzsche is a Lamarckian can be reinterpreted along Darwinian lines. I demonstrate that Nietzsche hits upon the right drivers of phenotypical change in humans, namely, torture and enclosures (e.g., walls of early states), but misinterprets their true impact. Nietzsche believes that these technologies are responsible for producing what I call “culture-serving memory” and the bad conscience by causing emotions that once were expressed outwardly to turn inward causing the “psychological digestion” of the human animal. In reality, however, these mechanisms are conducive to breeding a particular type of individual, namely, one who is docile, by introducing artificial and unconscious selective pressures into the environment of early humans. In showing that Nietzsche’s genealogical account of memory and bad conscience is not underpinned on a false scientific theory and is consistent with Neo-Darwinism, I deflect a potentially fatal blow regarding the veracity of Nietzsche’s genealogies. View Full-Text
Keywords: Nietzsche; genealogy; memory; torture; Lamarck; artificial selection; unconscious selection; time-crunch problem; culture-serving memory inheritability thesis Nietzsche; genealogy; memory; torture; Lamarck; artificial selection; unconscious selection; time-crunch problem; culture-serving memory inheritability thesis
MDPI and ACS Style

Lightbody, B. Artificial and Unconscious Selection in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned Pill of the Lamarckian Reading. Genealogy 2019, 3, 31.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop