Next Article in Journal
Micropropagation of Rare Endemic Species Allium microdictyon Prokh. Threatened in Kazakhstani Altai
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of CO2 Enrichment on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of F1 Hybrid Strawberry Grown under Controlled Greenhouse Condition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Control of Streptomyces Species Causing Common Scabs in Potato Tubers in the Yaqui Valley, Mexico
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion

by
Thaís Magni Cavichioli
1,2,
Maiara Curtolo
1,
Mariangela Cristofani-Yaly
1,
Josiane Rodrigues
3 and
Helvécio Della Coletta-Filho
1,*
1
Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Cordeirópolis 13492-442, SP, Brazil
2
São Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal 14884-900, SP, Brazil
3
Department of Tecnologia Agroindustrial e Socioeconomia Rural, Univeridade Federal de São Carlos, Araras 13600-970, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Horticulturae 2024, 10(9), 942; https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090942
Submission received: 16 May 2024 / Revised: 26 June 2024 / Accepted: 1 July 2024 / Published: 3 September 2024

Abstract

:
The symptoms of huanglongbing (HLB), a disease caused by the bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), are visible on the canopy of citrus plants. They include mottling of leaves followed by dropping and lopsided fruits with premature dropping. Loss in phloem functionality and degradation of the root system are also HLB symptoms with a severe impact on plant growth and production. Some Citrus relatives, such as Poncirus trifoliata and its hybrids, have shown more tolerance to HLB disease and low titers of CLas compared to Citrus species, but little is known about the effects of CLas on their root system. In this study, we investigated the effects of CLas-infected ‘Valencia’ scion on the citrandarin IAC3222 (a hybrid between P. trifoliata and Sunki mandarin) used as rootstock as well as interstock between ‘Valencia’ and Swingle citrumelo rootstock. At 13 months post-inoculation, the cycle threshold values (CT) for CLas in the infected scion samples indicated a high CLas titer (from 15.9 to 22.7) regardless of the rootstock variety or interstock used. However, no CLas-positive samples were detected in the roots of IAC3222 (CT ranging from 37.9 to 40.0), in contrast to all Swingle roots (CT ranging from 27.9 to 31.3). Both root volume and mass were reduced in IAC3222 compared to uninfected ‘Valencia’ scion, suggesting that scion infection damages roots, regardless of whether they are contaminated or not by CLas. The damage to the root system of IAC3222 was significantly less severe than that of the Swingle rootstock. Multivariate hierarchical analysis considering all evaluated parameters clustered the CLas-infected plants grafted on IAC3222 together with the non-inoculated plants. We concluded that the IAC3222 rootstock was less affected by the CLas-infected scion compared to the Swingle rootstock and is a promising rootstock to minimize the HLB effect on plant development.

1. Introduction

Grafting in citrus has allowed growers to vegetatively propagate the most desirable characteristics of both scion and rootstock varieties for centuries. However, the right scion and rootstock combination is essential to achieve high orchard productivity and longevity [1]. As the rootstock influences scion development, yield, fruit quality, and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress [2,3], the choice of the rootstock variety is as important as the scion [4]. The citrus industry in Brazil has traditionally relied on a few rootstocks, and the switch from one predominant variety to another was mainly motivated by biotic stress. For example, the first commercial citrus plantations in Brazil were based on ‘Caipira’ sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L.) but due to its susceptibility to Phytophthora sp., this rootstock was changed to ‘Sour orange’ (Citrus aurantium L.) [5]. Later, the susceptibility of ‘Sour orange’ to Citrus Tristeza Virus (CTV) motivated the use of ‘Rangpur lime’ (Citrus reticulata hybrid) as the main rootstock variety [6,7]. Recently, ‘Rangpur lime’ has been replaced by ‘Swingle citrumelo’ as a consequence of its susceptibility to Citrus Sudden Death disease (in Northern Sao Paulo State) [8]. Additionally, the ‘Swingle citrumelo’ is chosen for its ability to provide better quality scion fruits for the production of no-frozen concentrate juice [6].
The huanglongbing (HLB) disease, caused by the bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas), is the main limitation of citrus production worldwide. In addition to visible symptoms on the scion (e.g., mottling of leaves followed by dropping, lopsided fruits with premature fruit drop, and plant stunting), the root system (mainly fibrous roots) of the rootstock is significantly reduced in CLas-infected plants [9,10]. Such a decrease in the citrus root system has been hypothesized as the cause of HLB symptoms in the leaves, but the results are controversial [11]. According to Johnson et al. [9], the density of fibrous roots was reduced in the citrumelo Swingle rootstock before the development of foliar HLB symptoms and was directly associated with CLas in roots. However, increased starch content in leaves [12,13,14], reduced photosynthetic activity [15], and increased callose deposition in the phloem [16,17] are symptoms frequently reported for HLB-infected plants, which together result in an imbalance of carbohydrates between the source and sink tissues [18,19]. Keeley et al. [15] speculated that those effects could be a consequence of CLas rather than strictly systemic responses to infection. We hypothesize that rootstocks more resilient to CLas infection (i.e., hosting low bacterium titers in the root and higher fibrous root density) can be an important tool to reduce damage caused by HLB.
Although no Citrus genotype is completely resistant to CLas, published works have shown different degrees of susceptibility among Citrus species [20]. Poncirus trifoliata, a close relative and sexually compatible with Citrus species, has been reported as tolerant to HLB and capable of hosting low CLas titers [21,22]. This characteristic has been genetically transmitted as some citrandarins (hybrids of Citrus sunki x P. trifoliata cv Rubidoux) remain uninfected after CLas inoculation through natural infection [23] or grafting [24,25,26]. However, the effects of HLB on the root system of citrandarins used as a rootstock remain to be investigated. Tolerant genotypes used as interstock between the susceptible scion and the rootstock led to positive effects on scion vigor (e.g., tree growth rate and canopy volume) [27]. Here, we used the citrandarin hybrid IAC3222 as the rootstock for ‘Valencia’ sweet orange and evaluated CLas colonization (in the rootstock and scion) and root volume and mass. IAC3222 was chosen based on previous results showing an 80% decrease in the number of CLas-infected IAC3222 plants during the experimental period [24], as well as its horticultural advantages in the experimental trials conducted by our team [28].

2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was conducted at the Citrus Center Sylvio Moreira, Agronomic Institute (IAC), in Cordeirópolis, São Paulo, Brazil from February 2019 to September 2021. Briefly, seeds of rootstock varieties were germinated in fine granulometry pine-bark substrate. After selection, nucellar seedlings (10–15 cm in height) were transplanted into 15 L plastic vessels containing medium granulometry pine-bark substrate and grown until grafting. The nursery plants were managed following the recommended technique [8], and CLas inoculation was performed by grafting two infected budsticks onto the main branch of each nursery plant. To avoid natural infections after grafting, plants were maintained in a greenhouse with temperatures not exceeding 30 °C and were watered twice daily (totaling 300 mL of water per plant/day). Macro (N:P2O5:K2O) and micronutrients (Zn, Mn, B) were added every 15 days. The treatments consisted of citrandarin hybrid IAC3222 as a rootstock (T1), Swingle citrumelo as a rootstock (T2), IAC3222 as interstock (a piece of stem—5 cm—inserted between the rootstock and scion using two graft unions) and Swingle citrumelo as a rootstock (T3), and IAC3222 as interstock (30 cm) and Swingle citrumelo as a rootstock (T4). ‘Valencia’ sweet orange was grafted as a scion in all treatments (Figure 1). We analyzed a total of six repetitions (2 inoculated with non-infected buds (control) and 4 inoculated with infected buds) per treatment.
Thirteen months after inoculation, 10 leaves from the canopy and fibrous roots were randomly harvested from each plant. The volume of the root system (estimated using the conventional method of water displacement by Bernardi et al. [29]), root dry mass, and main stem diameter (5 cm above substrate level) were also determined. Both the detection and quantification of CLas were performed using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) based on the protocol outlined by Li et al. [30] and described in detail by Cavichioli et al. [24]. DNA for the qPCR analysis was extracted from 300 mg of fresh tissues (leaf petioles from the scions or fibrous roots from the rootstocks) and isolated as described by Murray and Thompson [31].
The data were compared using the Scott–Knott test, with a significance level set at 5%. The horticultural indices of rootstocks (root system volume and weight, and main stem diameter) as well as the threshold cycle (CT) values obtained by qPCR, were analyzed using the multivariate technique of the hierarchical agglomerative clustering method proposed by Ward [32], with cluster arranged hierarchically according to Murtagh and Legendre [33].

3. Results and Discussion

The citrandarin hybrid of P. trifoliata X C. sunki (IAC3222) used as a scion has remained uninfected by CLas through natural transmission for over 8 years in an area with a high incidence of HLB and its insect vector Diaphorina citri [23]. Previous investigations have not found evidence supporting the natural P. trifoliata repellence of D. citri nymphs or adults [34], which suggests that IAC3222 could be naturally resistant or at least tolerant to CLas. Recently, our group demonstrated through top-grafting of IAC3222 onto HLB-diseased citrus plants hosting high CLas titers that the number of grafted sprouts infected with the bacteria decreased by 80% over 13 months [24]. Taken together, the citrandarin IAC3222 genotype has shown genetic resistance under natural infection conditions and high tolerance to CLas under a stressful experimental setup with constant pathogen flux from the source plant to the top-grafted citrandarin. Additionally, IAC3222 as a rootstock for the ‘Valencia’ scion in field trials with HLB incidence has shown less disease severity (grade 2) and horticultural advantages such as drought resistance and higher juice quality (e.g., °brix = 10.3, °brix: acidity ratio = 13.29, and juice weight = 103.2 g) and fruit size (242 g/fruit) compared to Rangpour lime (C. x limonia) rootstocks [28].
Our results reinforce the severe reduction in rootstock root volume (42% in T1 (IAC3222 as rootstock) to 70% in T2 (Swingle citrumelo) 13 months after inoculation) when the scion was infected by CLas, with a similar trend for the root dry weight (Table 1). This significantly lower damage to the root system of IAC3222 (T1) could explain the lack of difference in the diameter of the main stem between CLas-infected and non-infected treatments. However, for treatments T2 and T3, the diameter of the main stem measured 5 cm above the substrate surface was significantly larger in non-infected plants (Table 1). The lack of difference between infected and non-infected T4 plants could be attributed to the negative effect of the interstock length (30 cm) on plant development. In contrast to Swingle citrumelo roots, regardless of the presence of interstocks (T2, T3, and T4), CLas was not detected in the roots of IAC3222 (T1) (Table 1). The average CLas titer in the ‘Valencia’ scion was generally high (CT values ranging from 19 to 22.7) at 13 months post-inoculation, with no significant difference among treatments (Table 1). This suggests that the lack of detection of bacteria in the IAC3222 rootstock did not reflect the actual titer in the scion. Graham and co-workers [35] showed no correlation between CLas quantification in the scion and the root system but they demonstrated that the bacterium colonizes the roots, serving as a source of inoculum for the scion. Regardless of whether the reduced root system density was a cause or effect of HLB symptoms in the leaves [11], the density of fibrous roots was reduced in the tested rootstocks. Specifically, for IAC3222, this decrease was not associated with CLas in the roots (Table 1), in contrast to what was hypothesized by Johnson et al. [9] using Swingle citrumelo as the rootstock. We supposed that the damage to scion physiology (e.g., accumulation of starch in the leaves [12,13,14], reduced photosynthetic activity [15], increased callose deposition in the phloem [16,17], and imbalance of carbohydrates between the source and sink [18,19]) could explain the reduced root density observed in IAC3222.
Taking together all the evaluated parameters and using the Euclidean distance to measure similarity among treatments [32], we observed that citrandarin IAC3222 as the rootstock of CLas-infected plants was clustered together with non-infected plants (Figure 2). This further corroborates that CLas in the scion has a lower impact on the IAC3222 rootstock. Recently, Dutt et al. [27] demonstrated that the use of HLB-tolerant pummelo as an interstock between Swingle citrumelo and ‘Valencia’ enhanced the scion response against Clas compared to the Swingle control (no interstock). However, these conditions did not impair the multiplication of the bacteria in the scion. Here, the interstock IAC3222 (P. trofilita hybrid, tolerant to CLas) did not contribute to increasing the root volume or mass of the Swingle citrumelo rootstock. One possible explanation is that the sap flow to the rootstock was reduced as a consequence of poor vascular union between these genotypes [36].
Here, we provide evidence of a lesser effect of CLas in the root system of the citrandarin IAC3222 used as rootstock for the ‘Valencia’ scion containing a high population of bacteria. Furthermore, we could not detect CLas in the fibrous roots of that hybrid. We hypothesize that the use of a CLas-tolerant rootstock such as the citrandarin IAC3222, in combination with management strategies (e.g., the application of biostimulants [37], bactericidal molecules [38,39], and HLB-tolerant interstocks [36]) may enhance the plant response to CLas. The management of HLB requires a set of actions that begins with the optimal combination of scion/rootstock and vector population reduction, in addition to cultural practices such as adequate nutritional programs for the specific rootstock variety and other strategies to boost plant health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: H.D.C.-F. and M.C.-Y.; methodology: T.M.C. and M.C.; formal analysis: T.M.C. and J.R.; investigation: T.M.C., M.C., and J.R.; original draft preparation: T.M.C. and H.D.C.-F.; supervision: H.D.C.-F.; funding acquisition: H.D.C.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP—2020/07045-3). T.M. Cavichioli (FAPESP—2019/06412-5) and M. Curtulo (FAPESP—2021/03989-0) are grateful for their fellowships. H.D.C.F. and M.C.Y. are recipients of research fellowships from CNPq (proc. no. 308164/2021-0 and 313295/2020-4, respectively).

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors on request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Luis Fernando Carvalho Silva, Derik Festa, and Franciel Santos Barbosa for their assistance with the plants in the greenhouse. Both are consent for the acknowledgments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schäfer, G.; Bastianel, M.; Dornelles, A.L.C. Porta-enxertos utilizados na citricultura. Ciência Rural 2001, 31, 723–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bastos, D.C.; Ferreira, E.A.; Passos, O.S.; Sá, J.F.D.; Ataíde, E.M.; Calgaro, M. Cultivares copa e porta-enxertos para a citricultura brasileira. Citric. Inf. Agropecuário 2014, 35, 36–45. [Google Scholar]
  3. Martínez-Cuenca, M.R.; Primo-Capella, A.; Forner-Giner, M.A. Influence of rootstock on citrus tree growth: Effects on photosynthesis and carbohydrate distribution, plant size, yield, fruit quality, and dwarfing genotypes. Plant Growth 2016, 16, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tietel, Z.; Srivastava, S.; Fait, A.; Tel-Zur, N.; Carmi, N.; Raveh, E. Impact of scion/rootstock reciprocal effects on metabolomics of fruit juice and phloem sap in grafted Citrus reticulata. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Oliveira, R.P.; Soares Filho, W.D.S.; Passos, O.S.; Scivittaro, W.B.; da Rocha, P.S.G. Porta-enxertos para citros. Embrapa Clima Temperado 2008, 226, 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  6. Pompeu Junior, J. Porta-enxertos. In Citricultura Brasileira; Rodriguez, O., Viégas, F., Pompeu, J., Jr., Amaro, A.A., Eds.; Fundação Cargill: Campinas, Brazil, 1991; Volume 1, pp. 265–280. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pompeu Junior, J. Porta-enxertos para citros potencialmente ananicantes. Laranjeira 2001, 22, 147–155. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carvalho, S.A.D.; Girardi, E.A.; Mourão Filho, F.d.A.A.; Ferrarezi, R.S.; Coletta Filho, H.D. Advances in citrus propagation in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2019, 41, e422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Johnson, E.G.; Wu, J.; Bright, D.B.; Graham, J.H. Association of “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” root infection, but not phloem plugging with root loss on huanglongbing-affected trees prior to appearance of foliar symptoms. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dayse, D.; Santana-vieira, S.; Da Silva Gesteira, A.; Coelho Filho, M.A.; Gilberto, M.; Costa, C. Citrus responses and tolerance to drought. In Citrus Production; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  11. Nehela, Y.; Killiny, N. Revisiting the complex pathosystem of huanglongbing: Deciphering the role of citrus metabolites in symptom development. Metabolites 2020, 10, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Etxeberria, E.; Gonzalez, P.; Achor, D.; Albrigo, G. Anatomical distribution of abnormally high levels of starch in HLB-affected Valencia orange trees. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009, 74, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Folimonova, S.Y.; Achor, D.S. Early events of citrus greening (huanglongbing) disease development at the ultrastructural level. Phytopathology 2010, 100, 949–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Whitaker, D.C.; Giurcanu, M.C.; Young, L.J.; Gonzalez, P.; Etxeberria, E.; Roberts, P.; Hendricks, K.; Roman, F. Starch content of citrus leaves permits diagnosis of Huanglongbing in the warm season but not cool season. Hortscience 2014, 49, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Keeley, M.; Rowland, D.; Vincent, C. Citrus photosynthesis and morphology acclimate to phloem-affecting huanglongbing disease at the leaf and shoot levels. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Koh, E.J.; Zhou, L.; Williams, D.S. Callose deposition in the phloem plasmodesmata and inhibition of phloem transport in citrus leaves infected with “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”. Protoplasma 2012, 249, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Welker, S.; Pierre, M.; Santiago, J.P.; Dutt, M.; Vincent, C.; Levy, A. Phloem transport limitation in Huanglongbing affected sweet orange is dependent on phloem-limited bacteria and callose. Tree Physiol. 2021, 42, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Balan, B.; Ibáñez, A.M.; Dandekar, A.M.; Caruso, T.; Martinelli, F. Identifying host molecular features strongly linked with responses to huanglongbing disease in citrus leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rao, M.J.; Ding, F.; Wang, N.; Deng, X.; Xu, Q. Metabolic mechanisms of host species against citrus Huanglongbing (Greening disease). Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2018, 37, 496–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alves, M.N.; Lopes, S.A.; Raiol-Junior, L.L.; Wulff, N.A.; Girardi, E.A.; Ollitrault, P.; Peña, L. Resistance to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’, the Huanglongbing associated bacterium, in sexually and/or graft-compatible Citrus relatives. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 617664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Albrecht, U.; Bowman, K.D. Tolerance of trifoliate citrus rootstock hybrids to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 147, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Folimonova, S.Y.; Robertson, C.J.; Garnsey, S.M.; Gowda, S.; Dawson, W.O. Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (Citrus Greening) under different conditions. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 1346–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boava, L.P.; Sagawa, C.H.D.; Cristofani-Yaly, M.; Machado, M.A. Incidence of ’Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-infected plants among citrandarins as rootstock and scion under field conditions. Phytopathology 2015, 105, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cavichioli, T.M.; Curtolo, M.; Cristofani-Yaly, M.; Rodrigues, J.; Coletta-Filho, H.D. Temporal analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in citrandarin genotypes indicates unstable infection. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Curtolo, M.; Pacheco, I.D.S.; Boava, L.P.; Takita, M.A.; Granato, L.M.; Galdeano, D.M.; De Souza, A.A.; Yaly, M.C.; Machado, M.A. Wide-ranging transcriptomic analysis of Poncirus trifoliata, Citrus sunki, Citrus sinensis and contrasting hybrids reveals HLB tolerance mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Soratto, T.A.T.; Curtolo, M.; Marengo, S.; Dezotti, A.L.; Lima, R.P.M.; Gazaffi, R.; Machado, M.A.; Cristofani-Yaly, M. QTL and eQTL mapping associated with host response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in citrandarins. Trop. Plant Pathol. 2020, 45, 626–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dutt, M.; Mahmoud, L.M.; Grosser, J.W. Field performance of ‘Valencia’ sweet orange trees grafted onto pummelo interstocks and Swingle citrumelo rootstocks under Huanglongbing (HLB) endemic conditions. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cristofani-Yaly, M.; (Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Cordeirópolis, SP, Brazil). Personal communication, 2022.
  29. Bernardi, A.C.D.C.; Carmello, Q.A.D.C.; De Carvalho, S.A. Desenvolvimento de mudas de citros cultivadas em vaso em resposta à adubação NPK. Sci. Agric. 2000, 57, 733–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, W.; Hartung, J.S.; Levy, L. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. J. Microbiol. Methods 2006, 66, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Murray, M.G.; Thompson, W.F. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980, 8, 4321–4325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ward, J.H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Murtagh, F.; Legendre, P. Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering Method: Clustering criterion and agglomerative algorithm. arXiv 2011, arXiv:1111.6285. [Google Scholar]
  34. Westbrook, C.J.; Hall, D.G.; Stover, E.; Duan, Y.P.; Lee, R.F. Colonization of citrus and citrus-related germplasm by Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). HortScience 2011, 46, 997–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Graham, J.H.; Johnson, E.G.; Gottwald, T.R.; Irey, M.S. Presymptomatic fibrous root decline in citrus trees caused by huanglongbing and potential interaction with Phytophthora spp. Plant Dis. 2013, 97, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hayat, F.; Li, J.; Iqbal, S.; Peng, Y.; Hong, L.; Balal, R.M.; Khan, M.N.; Nawaz, M.A.; Khan, U.; Farhan, M.A.; et al. A Mini Review of citrus rootstocks and their role in high-density orchards. Plants 2022, 11, 2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Castellano-Hinojosa, A.; Meyering, B.; Nuzzo, A.; Strauss, S.L.; Albrecht, U. Effect of plant biostimulants on root and plant health and the rhizosphere microbiome of citrus trees in huanglongbing-endemic conditions. Trees-Struct. Funct. 2021, 35, 1525–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pitino, M.; Sturgeon, K.; Dorado, C.; Cano, L.M.; Manthey, J.A.; Shatters, R.G., Jr.; Rossi, L. Quercus leaf extracts display curative effects against Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus that restore leaf physiological parameters in HLB-affected citrus trees. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 148, 70–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, M.; Powell, C.A.; Zhou, L.; He, Z.; Stover, E.; Duan, Y. Chemical compounds effective against the citrus Huanglongbing bacterium ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ in planta. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Illustrative figure of all treatments in this experiment. T1—Citrandarin IAC3222 as rootstock. T2—Swingle citrumelo as rootstock. T3 and T4—Citrandarin IAC3222 as interstock of 5 and 30 cm lengths, respectively, and Swingle citrumelo as rootstock. For all the treatments, the ‘Valencia’ sweet orange was used as scion.
Figure 1. Illustrative figure of all treatments in this experiment. T1—Citrandarin IAC3222 as rootstock. T2—Swingle citrumelo as rootstock. T3 and T4—Citrandarin IAC3222 as interstock of 5 and 30 cm lengths, respectively, and Swingle citrumelo as rootstock. For all the treatments, the ‘Valencia’ sweet orange was used as scion.
Horticulturae 10 00942 g001
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of the evaluated variables (diameter of the main stem, volume and dry weight of the root system, and Ct values) in response to different rootstocks and interstocks (T1, T2, T3, and T4) for ‘Valencia’ scion infected with CLas in comparison with non-infected plants. The numbers at the nodes represent percentage bootstrap values of 1000 replicates.
Figure 2. Cluster analysis of the evaluated variables (diameter of the main stem, volume and dry weight of the root system, and Ct values) in response to different rootstocks and interstocks (T1, T2, T3, and T4) for ‘Valencia’ scion infected with CLas in comparison with non-infected plants. The numbers at the nodes represent percentage bootstrap values of 1000 replicates.
Horticulturae 10 00942 g002
Table 1. Impact of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-infected ‘Valencia’ orange plant on the root system.
Table 1. Impact of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’-infected ‘Valencia’ orange plant on the root system.
TreatmentsDiameter of the Main Stem (mm)Root System Volume
(cm3)
Root System Dry Weight
(g)
CT Values 1
InfectedHealthyInfectedHealthyInfectedHealthyScionRoots
T119.5 ± 2.1 a 21.0 ± 1.8 a222.5 ± 36.5 a381.5 ± 95.5 * a154.1 ± 18.3 a238.5 ± 6.9 * a19.0 ± 2.6 a37.4 ± 0.9 a
T218.1 ± 1.8 a20.5 ± 1.5 * a154.5 ± 48.8 b509.5 ± 3.2 * a86.8 ± 18.5 b243.0 ± 4.3 * a19.3 ± 0.7 a31.3 ± 0.5 b
T316.9 ± 3.2 b20.5 ± 0.5 * a163.7 ± 38.5 b364.5 ± 10.8 * a72.8 ± 12.5 b218.8 ± 8.9 * a22.7 ± 4.3 a27.9 ± 0.9 c
T414.4 ± 1.9 b16.2 ± 0.5 * b106.5 ± 46.7 b307.0 ± 15.7 * a63.2 ± 11.6 b129.1 ± 7.5 * b15.9 ± 0.4 a30.5 ± 1.4 b
Data are means ± standard deviation. Significant differences (Scott–Knott test at 5% probability) are shown by letters (a,b,c) among the treatments and by asterisks (*) between infected and healthy plants in the same treatment. T1 = Rootstock citrandarin IAC3222, T2 = Rootstock Swingle citrumelo, T3 = Interstock IAC3222 (5 cm) and rootstock Swingle citrumelo, T4 = Interstock IAC3222 (30 cm), and rootstock Swingle citrumelo. 1 Samples with cycle threshold (CT) values < 32 were considered CLas-positive. All samples from the non-inoculated plants had CT values ranging between 34.8 and 40 (undetermined).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cavichioli, T.M.; Curtolo, M.; Cristofani-Yaly, M.; Rodrigues, J.; Coletta-Filho, H.D. Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090942

AMA Style

Cavichioli TM, Curtolo M, Cristofani-Yaly M, Rodrigues J, Coletta-Filho HD. Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(9):942. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090942

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cavichioli, Thaís Magni, Maiara Curtolo, Mariangela Cristofani-Yaly, Josiane Rodrigues, and Helvécio Della Coletta-Filho. 2024. "Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion" Horticulturae 10, no. 9: 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090942

APA Style

Cavichioli, T. M., Curtolo, M., Cristofani-Yaly, M., Rodrigues, J., & Coletta-Filho, H. D. (2024). Effects of ‘Candidatus’ Liberibacter Asiaticus on the Root System of Poncirus trifoliata Hybrids as a Rootstock for ‘Valencia’ Scion. Horticulturae, 10(9), 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10090942

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop