Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Measures in Vegetable Cropping Systems
1. Introduction
2. An Overview of Published Articles
- The article by Buragohain et al. (Contribution 1) attempted to generate evidence and fundamental knowledge of suitable bio-pesticides that could be included as effective components in IPM packages to manage invasive Phthorimaea absoluta (also known as Tuta absoluta). The authors systematically evaluated commercially available bio-pesticides based on Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki, Beauveria bassiana, and neem in laboratory conditions in India. Subsequently, the efficacy of selected bio-pesticides against invasive tomato leaf miners was assessed through farmer-participatory trials in different locations. This led to the sustainable management of this invasive pest and thus reduced the reliance on chemical pesticides.
- The second article by LaTora et al. (Contribution 2) evaluated the effects of insect exclusion netting (IEN) in combination with selected pesticides on whitefly population dynamics and virus incidence in greenhouse-grown yellow squash seedlings in 2018 and 2019. Field experiments from 2018 to 2021 evaluated the effects of various mulch types, row covers, and insecticides on whitefly population dynamics, silver leaf disorder (SSL) intensity, virus symptom severity, and marketable yield. The results demonstrated that a combination of cultural and chemical tactics, including row covers, UV-reflective mulch, and selected insecticides, can reduce whitefly and virus pressure and preserve yields in squash production in the southeastern United States, highlighting the potential of IPM strategies.
- A 2019 survey conducted in Tajikistan by Chan et al. (Contribution 3) identified various virus diseases affecting tomatoes, cucumbers, and mung beans, which is likely the first report on this topic from this region. Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) was the most common disease in all three crops. Potato virus Y (PVY) was detected in tomatoes, whereas the Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) was detected in cucumbers, and the Bean common mosaic virus (BCMV) was detected in mung beans. Over two-thirds of the samples showed mixed infections, mostly transmitted by aphids, suggesting that managing aphids is extremely important.
- Badenes-Pérez and Heckel’s (Contribution 4) analysis of the host plant preferences of the diamondback moth (DBM), a cosmopolitan pest, has contributed to a deeper understanding of the DBM’s behavior in the context of its host plant chemical—glucosinolates. The study results highlighted that crops with high glucosinolate content could be more susceptible to DBM damage than crops with low glucosinolate content, providing better insights into its management.
- In greenhouses in Germany, Dieckhoff and Meyhöfer (Contribution 5) optimized the use of colored sticky traps for monitoring cotton aphids (Aphis gossypii) in cucumber cultivation. It is interesting to note the mismatches between trap catches and aphid population density, especially early in the season, which are most likely related to the immigration of winged aphids into the greenhouse. However, the subsequent population build-up of the cotton aphid on the cucumber plants correlated quite well with counts of alate cotton aphids on the sticky traps. Thus, trapping winged aphids provides valuable information for integrated pest control in greenhouses.
- Finally, Onamu et al. (Contribution 6) examined farmers’ knowledge, perceptions, and practices for managing the False Codling Moth (FCM, Thaumatotibia leucotreta) in Capsicum cropping systems in Kenya. More than 80 percent of the respondents knew of the FCM infesting Capsicum sp., and almost all the farmers used insecticides to manage the problem. Only 40% of the farmers applied IPM strategies, including using bio-control agents and intercropping with repellent plants to manage this pest. The authors also identified the training needs for smallholder farmers to reduce overreliance on synthetic chemical pesticides and to maintain export goals to the EU.
3. Conclusions
Conflicts of Interest
List of Contributions
- Buragohain, P.; Saikia, D.K.; Sotelo-Cardona, P.; Srinivasan, R. Evaluation of Bio-Pesticides against the South American Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in India. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7090325.
- LaTora, A.G.; Codod, C.B.; Legarrea, S.; Dutta, B.; Kemerait, R.C., Jr.; Adkins, S.; Turechek, W.; Coolong, T.; da Silva, A.L.B.R.; Srinivasan, R. Combining Cultural Tactics and Insecticides for the Management of the Sweetpotato Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci MEAM1, and Viruses in Yellow Squash. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8040341.
- Chan, Y.-L.; Saidov, N.; Lee, L.-M.; Kuo, F.-H.; Shih, S.-L.; Kenyon, L. Survey of Viruses Infecting Tomato, Cucumber and Mung Bean in Tajikistan. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 505. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8060505.
- Badenes-Pérez, F.R.; Heckel, D.G. Intraspecific and Interstage Similarities in Host-Plant Preference in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Horticulturae 2023, 9, 39. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9010039.
- Dieckhoff, C.; Meyhöfer, R. If Only You Could Catch Me—Catch Me If You Can: Monitoring Aphids in Protected Cucumber Cultivations by Means of Sticky Traps. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9050571.
- Onamu, E.M.; Mutyambai, D.M.; Nyangau, I.M.; Nderitu, J.H.; Kasina, M.; Kilalo, D.C.; Mweke, A.N. Farmers’ Knowledge, Perceptions, and Management Practices of False Codling Moth (Thaumatotibia leucotreta) in Smallholder Capsicum sp. Cropping Systems in Kenya. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10040331.
References
- Manickam, R.; Kaur, D.P.; Vemula, A.; Rathore, A.; Unkovich, M.; Bellotti, W.; Kumar, A.; Gorai, B.; Madhavan Nair, R. Diversifying vegetable production systems for improving the livelihood of resource poor farmers on the East Indian Plateau. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 966376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kataki, P.K. Shifts in cropping system and its effect on human nutrition: Case study from India. J. Crop Prod. 2014, 6, 119–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joosten, F.; Dijkxhoorn, Y.; Sertse, Y.; Ruben, R. How Does the Fruit and Vegetable Sector Contribute to Food and Nutrition Security? LEI Nota 2015–2076; LEI Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Weinberger, K.; Lumpkin, T.A. Diversification into Horticulture and Poverty Reduction: A Research Agenda. World Dev. 2007, 35, 1464–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schreinemachers, P.; Chen, H.P.; Nguyen, T.T.L.; Buntong, B.; Bouapaoe, L.; Gautam, S.; Le, N.T.; Pinnh, T.; Vilaysone, P.; Srinivasan, R. Too much to handle? Pesticide dependence of smallholder vegetable farmers in Southeast Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 593–594, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schreinemachers, P.; Grovermann, C.; Praneetvatakul, S.; Heng, P.; Nguyen, T.T.L.; Buntong, B.; Le, N.T.; Pinn, T. How much is too much? Quantifying pesticide overuse in vegetable production in Southeast Asia. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srinivasan, R.; Subramanian, S.; Tamò, M. The case for integrated pest management in Africa: Transition from a pesticide-based approach. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2022, 54, 100970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bottrell, D.G. Council on Environmental Quality—Integrated Pest Management; Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1979; p. 120.
- Parsa, S.; Morse, S.; Bonifacio, A.; Chancellor, T.; Condori, B.; Crespo-Pérez, V.; Hobbs, S.; Kroschel, J.; Ba, M.; Rebaudo, F.; et al. Obstacles to IPM adoption in developing countries. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 3889–3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ramasamy, S. Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Measures in Vegetable Cropping Systems. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111175
Ramasamy S. Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Measures in Vegetable Cropping Systems. Horticulturae. 2024; 10(11):1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111175
Chicago/Turabian StyleRamasamy, Srinivasan. 2024. "Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Measures in Vegetable Cropping Systems" Horticulturae 10, no. 11: 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111175
APA StyleRamasamy, S. (2024). Implementation of Integrated Pest Management Measures in Vegetable Cropping Systems. Horticulturae, 10(11), 1175. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10111175