In the original article [1], there were two mistakes in the published version of Table 1. For patient 3, the tumor should be “Metastasis” instead of “Primary”; for patient 10, the excision place should be “Lymph Node” instead of “Skin”. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1.
Patients and corresponding cell lines. The table presents the patients’ demographics and treatments as well as the characteristics of the cell lines.
Table 1.
Patients and corresponding cell lines. The table presents the patients’ demographics and treatments as well as the characteristics of the cell lines.
| Gender | Tumor | Excision Place | Cell Lines | Treatment | Immunotherapy | Duration | Cell Line Purity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | M | Metastasis | Lymph node | MM130820 | Before IT | 87% | ||
| Patient 2 | F | Metastasis | Trunk | MM150325 | Before IT | 98% | ||
| F | Metastasis | Trunk | MM150604 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 weeks | 74% | |
| Patient 3 | F | Metastasis | Lymph node | MM140905 | Before IT | 99% | ||
| Patient 4 | M | Metastasis | Back | M130107 | Before IT | 59% | ||
| M | Metastasis | Lymph node | M121102 | Before IT | 65% | |||
| Patient 5 | F | Metastasis | Lung | M121008 | Before IT | 20% | ||
| Patient 6 | F | Metastasis | Lymph node | MM130626 | Before IT | 60% | ||
| Patient 7 | F | Metastasis | Leg | MM130106 | Before IT | 57% | ||
| F | Metastasis | Leg | MM131205 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 weeks | 78% | |
| F | Metastasis | Leg | MM131206 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 weeks | 65% | |
| Patient 8 | M | Metastasis | Trunk | MM150405 | Before IT | 58% | ||
| M | Metastasis | Lymph node | M150404 | Before IT | ||||
| Patient 9 | F | Metastasis | Skin | MM130926 | Before IT | 50% | ||
| Patient 10 | F | Metastasis | Lymph node | M980513 | Before IT | 83% | ||
| Patient 11 | M | Metastasis | Arm | MM140902 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 months | 100% |
| M | Metastasis | Arm | M130830 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 months | 100% | |
| Patient 12 | M | Metastasis | Back | MM130434 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 months | 77% |
| Patient 13 | M | Metastasis | Trunk | MM121224 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 3 months | 75% |
| Patient 14 | M | Metastasis | Skin | M130420 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 10 days | 100% |
| M | Metastasis | Liver | M130421 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 10 days | 100% | |
| M | Metastasis | Testis | M130425 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 10 days | 100% | |
| M | Metastasis | Lung | MM130427 | Relapsed | Ipilimumab | 10 days | 97% |
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Reference
- Tusup, M.; Cheng, P.F.; Picardi, E.; Raziunaite, A.; Dummer, R.; Levesque, M.P.; French, L.E.; Guenova, E.; Kundig, T.M.; Pascolo, S. Evaluation of the Interplay between the ADAR Editome and Immunotherapy in Melanoma. Non-Coding RNA 2021, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).