Removal of Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Technical Note
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Population
2.2. Technique
3. Results
3.1. Procedural Results
3.2. Patients’ Characteristics
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sanna, T.; Diener, H.C.; Passman, R.S.; Di Lazzaro, V.; Bernstein, R.A.; Morillo, C.A.; Brachmann, J. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 2478–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sposato, L.A.; Cipriano, L.E.; Saposnik, G.; Ruíz Vargas, E.; Riccio, P.M.; Hachinski, V. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iwata, T.; Todo, K.; Yamagami, H.; Morimoto, M.; Hashimoto, T.; Doijiri, R.; Furuya, H. Detection Rate of Atrial Fibrillation With Insertable Cardiac Monitor Implantation in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke Diagnosed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019, 28, 2569–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lp James, E. Insertable cardiac monitor extraction technique: Hook and reel. J. Interv. Card Electrophysiol. 2020, 59, 481–483. [Google Scholar]
Patients Underwent ICM Removal (n = 37) | |
---|---|
Women | 19 (51%) |
Age, years | 69 [55–81] |
PAF detection | 19 (51%) |
Time from implantation to removal, days | 651 [202–1093] |
Reason for ICM removal | |
Battery depletion | 24 (65%) |
Early removal before battery depletion after PAF detection | 12 (32%) |
Exposure of the device to the body surface | 1 (3%) |
ICM device model | |
Reveal LINQ (Medtronic, Minneapolis) | 23 (62%) |
Confirm Rx (Abbott, Illinois) | 11 (30%) |
BioMonitor 2 (BIOTRONIK, Berlin) | 3 (8%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Egashira, S.; Kimura, N.; Doijiri, R. Removal of Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Technical Note. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10010015
Egashira S, Kimura N, Doijiri R. Removal of Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Technical Note. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2023; 10(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10010015
Chicago/Turabian StyleEgashira, Shuhei, Naoto Kimura, and Ryosuke Doijiri. 2023. "Removal of Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Technical Note" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 10, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10010015
APA StyleEgashira, S., Kimura, N., & Doijiri, R. (2023). Removal of Insertable Cardiac Monitor for Cryptogenic Stroke: A Technical Note. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd10010015