Next Article in Journal
Collection of Environmental Variables and Bacterial Community Compositions in Marian Cove, Antarctica, during Summer 2018
Previous Article in Journal
FIKWaste: A Waste Generation Dataset from Three Restaurant Kitchens in Portugal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Data Descriptor

FIKWater: A Water Consumption Dataset from Three Restaurant Kitchens in Portugal

1
ITI, LARSyS, Técnico Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
2
ITI, LARSyS, ARDITI, 9020-105 Funchal, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Now at Empresa de Eletricidade da Madeira.
Submission received: 25 January 2021 / Revised: 19 February 2021 / Accepted: 24 February 2021 / Published: 2 March 2021

Abstract

:
With the advent of the Internet of Things (IoT) and low-cost sensing technologies, the availability of data has reached levels never imagined before by the research community. However, independently of their size, data are only as valuable as the ability to have access to them. This paper presents the FIKWater dataset, which contains time series data for hot and cold water demand collected from three restaurant kitchens in Portugal for consecutive periods between two and four weeks. The measurements were taken using ultrasonic flow meters, at a sampling frequency of 0.2 Hz. Additionally, some details of the monitored spaces are also provided.
Dataset License: CC-BY-4.0

1. Summary

Industrial Kitchens (IKs) consume vast amounts of water for cooking and especially for cleaning. Nevertheless, in contrast to the domestic sector (e.g., [1,2,3,4,5]), very little attention has been devoted to gain a deeper understanding of the demand for water in IKs (e.g., [6,7,8]). Instead, water consumption is often studied as a whole, particularly in the hospitality sector [9,10,11,12].
The Future Industrial Kitchen (FIK) project (see https://futurekitchen.m-iti.org/ (accessed on 1 March 2021)) was placed in the Portuguese luxury hospitality sector. It aimed at developing a next-generation concept for IKs by combining, among others, Internet of Things (IoT) enabled interactive technologies and optimized appliances arrangements to maximize the efficiency and pleasurability of the operating staff. One of the main goals of the FIK project was to understand how electricity and water are consumed in high-end IKs. To this end, noninvasive electricity and water monitoring technology was deployed in the kitchens of three restaurants for consecutive periods of four weeks [13,14]. The monitored electricity and water consumption data were later used as inputs to a digital dashboard designed to provided real-time and historical feedback on resource consumption.
This data descriptor presents the aggregated hot and cold water demand data collected during the three real-world deployments performed in the scope of this project. Furthermore, for one of the IKs, details about wet appliances (dishwasher and glasswasher) are also available. Such details include information on the periods when such appliances were ON or OFF, taken from the analysis of their electricity consumption from these two appliances.

Relation to Prior Datasets

Having received considerable attention from the research community, particularly in recent years, there has also been an effort to release water consumption datasets. In [15], Di Mauroet et al. [15] review 92 urban water demand datasets. The reviewed datasets were distributed across three spatial scales, district (20 datasets), household (31), and end-use (41). Unfortunately, many of these datasets are not available with an open-source license. Instead, some have restricted access (e.g., requiring a commercial license of special requests to the data owners), whereas for others (primarily in papers published in the 1970s/80s/90s), there is no information on accessing them.
Interestingly, there are no references to water demand in restaurants. Furthermore, a search on data.world (see https://data.world/search (accessed on 1 March 2021)) and openei.org (see https://openei.org/ (accessed on 1 March 2021)) for the keywords “kitchen water” and “restaurant water” did not reveal any relevant results that suggested the existence of such datasets.
To the best of our knowledge, FIKWater is one of the few publicly available datasets with water demand from restaurant kitchens. Hence, making this a valuable and unique contribution to the water monitoring and management research fields. More particularly, this dataset can be used to develop methodologies to explore water consumption in restaurants [7]. Likewise, this FIKWater can also be used to develop and evaluate water consumption benchmarks across kitchens, which is a topic currently underexplored in the context of electricity consumption (e.g., [16,17]) but not covered when it comes to water demand.
From a more technical perspective, FIKWater can also be used in the context of machine-learning research. For example, in the context of non-intrusive water disaggregation [3,5], which identifies the water consumption of individual wet-appliances taking only aggregated water demand measurements. In this context, the fact that FIKWater contains information about individual wet-appliances in one of the kitchens makes it particularly relevant. Finally, this dataset can also serve to further the research in the simulation of water demand profiles in industrial contexts, which unlike the domestic sector (e.g., [18,19]), is still relatively under-explored, e.g., [20].

2. Methods

This section provides an overview of the data collection process that leads to creating the FIKWater dataset.

2.1. Data Collection Hardware

The water consumption was measured using an ultrasonic flow meter, specifically the TUF2000M (see http://www.t3-1.com/english/index.php (accessed on 1 March 2021)) installed on the main water entrance pipe, hence monitoring the total water demand. The TUF2000M measures the following parameters: (1) instantaneous flow rate, (2) liquid velocity, (3) speed of sound, (4) positive and negative accumulators, and (5) totals (day, month and year).
The main reason to select an ultrasonic flow meter is the fact that they enable monitoring the water flow from outside the pipes with clamp-on sensors, hence avoiding invasive changes to the existing infrastructure. Figure 1 shows the used sensor and an illustration of the installation procedure. Table 1 lists the most relevant features of the TUF2000M ultrasonic flow meter.
After installing the sensors, it was necessary to set the following parameters in the meter: (1) type of liquid to monitor, (2) internal and external diameter of the pipe, (3) pipe thickness, (4) pipe material, (5) connection type, and (6) distance between the ultrasonic transducers.

2.2. Monitoring Platform

In order to proceed with the data collection, a bespoke monitoring platform was developed. Figure 2 illustrates the main components of the platform. The clamp-on sensors are placed on the water pipe, measuring the water flow. The monitored data were then sent to the local gateway using the Modbus protocol (see https://modbus.org/ (accessed on 1 March 2021)) protocol. The data were stored locally before being uploaded to the Internet using the standard HTTPS protocol.
Figure 3 shows the block diagram with the gateway’s different components. In simple terms, the system worked as follows. The data acquisition software running in the Raspberry Pi (see https://www.raspberrypi.org/ (accessed on 25 January 2021)) took measurements from the ultrasonic flow meter at predefined S seconds intervals. By default, the value of M was set to five seconds, but it could also be given as an input to the data acquisition algorithm.
The collected measurements were stored on a local database. Every minute, the most up-to-date measurements were uploaded to an online database server for providing near real-time data access to interested third-parties (e.g., an application developer). Furthermore, every day at 12:00 a.m., a Comma Separated Values (CSV) file with the daily readings was uploaded to a shared folder. Upon successful upload, existing records were deleted from the local database to keep its footprint as light as possible at all times.
A Real Time Clock (RTC) was used to keep track of the time in the gateway and provide timestamps to collected measurements. Finally, a 3S lithium battery was used to allow deployments in places without a power connection and to avoid data losses in case of a power outage since the used sensing device did not have internal memory to store instantaneous measurements.
Figure 4 shows a picture of the developed prototype, depicting the main components: (1) 3S battery, (2) TUF2000M, (3) Transducers, and (4) Raspberry Pi.

2.3. Deployments

The monitoring platform was deployed in three restaurant kitchens for consecutive periods between two (kitchen 1) and four weeks (kitchens 2 and 3). Table 2 summarizes the details of each kitchen.
In order to monitor both hot and cold water consumption, two monitoring systems were deployed in each kitchen. Figure 5 depicts two of the three deployments of the platforms. Unfortunately, due to physical constraints with the hot water installation of kitchen number 3, the recorded data were not accurate. Therefore it was not possible to add them to the FIKWater dataset.

2.4. Data Labeling

To enrich the dataset’s potential applications, FIKWater also contained annotations of the periods when wet appliances (dishwasher and glasswasher) were turned ON or OFF. The annotations were obtained by manually inspecting those appliances’ electricity consumption profiles when such data were available. More precisely, a wet appliance was considered ON when consuming energy for more than 15 consecutive minutes. Conversely, it was considered OFF when there was no consumption, or the observed consumption happened for less than 15 min. The threshold of 15 min was set empirically after observing the electricity consumption of the wet-appliances for the dataset’s duration.

3. Data Description

The FIKWater dataset was made available individually for each monitored kitchen, and all the data files were in CSV format. Figure 6 shows an overview of the underlying organization of the FIKWater dataset. The following subsections describe the contents of the different files.

3.1. Demand Data

The water demand files (<?>_demand.csv) contained the measurements taken from the water flow sensors. These measurements were provided in raw form, i.e., as measured by the sensors. The underlying fields of the measurements files are described in Table 3.

3.2. Labels Data

The label files (<?>_labels.csv) identified the periods when wet appliances were turned ON or OFF. The underlying fields are described in Table 4. The technical details of the wet appliances are provided in the wet_appliances.txt file.

3.3. Deployments

The deployments file (deployments.csv) contained additional details of each deployment. The underlying fields are described in Table 5. Note that the Start and End dates refer to the date of the first and last water consumption measurements in each kitchen, respectively. These dates did not necessarily correspond to the start and end dates in Table 2 since these corresponded to the start and end of the FIK monitoring campaigns.

4. Data Exploration and Conclusions

The number of monitoring days and records collected in the three kitchens are presented in Table 6. Coverage indicates the ratio between the monitored and the expected number of samples at the rate of one sample every five seconds ( 1 5 Hz), which, as can be observed, was very high across the three kitchens.
Figure 7 shows the distribution of the daily water flows (flow_today) in each of the monitored kitchens. As it can be observed from the water flows in kitchens 1 and 2, cold water consumption was much higher than that of hot water. This, in part, happened because most of the activities, like cooking and cleaning (normally happening at the end of the day), used cold water. On the other hand, hot water was used mostly for dishwashing.
Furthermore, it was possible to see that the consumption of cold water in kitchen 3 was much higher than that of the other kitchens (nine times higher than kitchen 1 and 19 times higher than kitchen 2). After consultation with the kitchen maintenance services, it was found that the monitored pipes were not fully dedicated to the kitchen operations. As such, a big part of these measurements referred to the consumption of other hotel divisions. This effect was also observable in Figure 8 (bottom), which shows that water was continuously used over the 24 h.
This clearly contrasts the measurements from kitchens 1 and 2 (see Figure 9), where it is evident that water was mostly used during specific periods of the day. For example, in kitchen 1, both hot and cold water were used more intensively after 10:00 PM, which corresponded to the dinner service’s end.
Finally, Figure 10 illustrates the total (hot + cold water) flow rate measurements supplemented with the labeled wet appliances transitions. The green dashed line represents ON transitions, whereas the red dotted lines represent the OFF events. As can be observed, there was also water consumption outside the periods where these appliances were ON, representing water uses for other purposes (e.g., cooking or cleaning) or wet appliances that were not monitored.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P. and V.A.; methodology, L.P. and V.A.; software, L.P., V.A. and F.V.; validation, L.P., V.A. and F.V.; resources, L.P.; data curation, L.P., V.A. and F.V.; writing—original draft preparation, L.P.; writing—review and editing, L.P. and V.A.; visualization, L.P.; supervision, L.P.; project administration, L.P.; funding acquisition, L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by project M1420-01-0247-FEDER-000018 (Madeira 14-20). Lucas Pereira received funding from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under grants CEECIND/01179/2017 and UIDB/50009/2020.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7BZ2M, reference number 7bz2m.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all the staff in the monitored kitchens and the technicians that assisted in planing and performing the three deployments of the monitoring platform.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CSV Comma Separated Values
FIK Future Industrial Kitchen
IK Industrial Kitchen
IoT Internet of Things
OSF Open Science Framework
RTC Real Time Clock

References

  1. Froehlich, J.E.; Larson, E.; Campbell, T.; Haggerty, C.; Fogarty, J.; Patel, S.N. HydroSense: Infrastructure-mediated single-point sensing of whole-home water activity. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp ’09, Orlando, FL, USA, 30 September–3 October 2009; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Richter, C.P.; Stamminger, R. Water Consumption in the Kitchen—A Case Study in Four European Countries. Water Resour. Manag. 2012, 26, 1639–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ellert, B.; Makonin, S.; Popowich, F. Appliance Water Disaggregation via Non-intrusive Load Monitoring (NILM). In Smart City 360; Leon-Garcia, A., Lenort, R., Holman, D., Staš, D., Krutilova, V., Wicher, P., Cagáňová, D., Špirková, D., Golej, J., Nguyen, K., Eds.; Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 455–467. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hussien, W.A.; Memon, F.A.; Savic, D.A. An integrated model to evaluate water-energy-food nexus at a household scale. Environ. Model. Softw. 2017, 93, 366–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pastor-Jabaloyes, L.; Arregui, F.J.; Cobacho, R. Water End Use Disaggregation Based on Soft Computing Techniques. Water 2018, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Murakawa, S.; Takata, H.; Nishina, D. Development of the Calculating Method for the Loads of Water Consumption in Restaurant. In Proceedings of the 30th W062 International Symposium on Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings, Paris, France, 16–17 September 2004; p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  7. Murakawa, S.; Nishina, D.; Takata, H.; Tanaka, A. An Analysis on the Loads of Hot Water Consumption in the Restaurants. In Proceedings of the 31st W062 International Symposium on Water Supply and Drainage for Buildings, Brussels, Belgium, 14–16 September 2005; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  8. Delagah, A.; Davis, R.; Slater, M.; Karas, A. Results from 20 Field Monitoring Projects on Rack and Flight Conveyor Dishwashers in Commercial Kitchens. ASHRAE Trans. 2007, 123. Available online: https://go.gale.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA490983843&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=00012505&p=AONE&sw=w (accessed on 1 March 2021).
  9. Deng, S. Energy and water uses and their performance explanatory indicators in hotels in Hong Kong. Energy Build. 2003, 35, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alonso, A.D. How Australian Hospitality Operations View Water Consumption and Water Conservation: An Exploratory Study. J. Hosp. Leis. Mark. 2008, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Angulo, A.; Atwi, M.; Barberán, R.; Mur, J. Economic Analysis of the Water Demand in the Hotels and Restaurants Sector: Shadow Prices and Elasticities. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50, 6577–6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gabarda-Mallorquí, A.; Garcia, X.; Ribas, A. Mass tourism and water efficiency in the hotel industry: A case study. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 61, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pereira, L.; Aguiar, V.; Vasconcelos, F. Future Industrial Kitchen: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation, BuildSys ’19, New York, NY, USA, 13–14 November 2019; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vasconcelos, F.; Aguiar, V.; Pereira, L. Ultrasonic waste monitoring in the future industrial kitchen: Poster abstract. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, SenSys ’19, New York, NY, USA, 10–13 November 2019; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Di Mauro, A.; Cominola, A.; Castelletti, A.; Di Nardo, A. Urban Water Consumption at Multiple Spatial and Temporal Scales. A Review of Existing Datasets. Water 2021, 13, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hedrick, R.; Smith, V.; Field, K. Restaurant Energy Use Benchmarking Guideline; Technical Report NREL/SR-5500-50547, 1019165; NREL: Golden, CO, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mudie, S. Energy Benchmarking in UK Commercial Kitchens. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2016, 37, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zaher, R.; Chaccour, K.; Badr, G. Intelligent Software Simulation of Water Consumption in Domestic Homes. In Proceedings of the 2016 UKSim-AMSS 18th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), Cambridge, UK, 6–8 April 2016; pp. 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ritchie, M.J.; Engelbrecht, J.A.A.; Booysen, M.J. A Probabilistic Hot Water Usage Model and Simulator for Use in Residential Energy Management. Energy Build. 2021, 235, 110727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Blokker, E.J.M.; Pieterse-Quirijns, E.J.; Vreeburg, J.H.G.; van Dijk, J.C. Simulating Nonresidential Water Demand with a Stochastic End-Use Model. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2011, 137, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Left: TUF2000M Ultrasonic flow meter; Right: illustration of installation.
Figure 1. Left: TUF2000M Ultrasonic flow meter; Right: illustration of installation.
Data 06 00026 g001
Figure 2. Main components of the water consumption monitoring platform (icons by draw.io (accessed on 25 January 2021) and flaticon.com (accessed on 25 January 2021)).
Figure 2. Main components of the water consumption monitoring platform (icons by draw.io (accessed on 25 January 2021) and flaticon.com (accessed on 25 January 2021)).
Data 06 00026 g002
Figure 3. Block diagram showing the different components of the gateway.
Figure 3. Block diagram showing the different components of the gateway.
Data 06 00026 g003
Figure 4. Box deployed with all the hardware needed for the water monitoring: (1) 3S battery, (2) TUF2000M, (3) Transducers, and (4) Raspberry Pi.
Figure 4. Box deployed with all the hardware needed for the water monitoring: (1) 3S battery, (2) TUF2000M, (3) Transducers, and (4) Raspberry Pi.
Data 06 00026 g004
Figure 5. The cold and hot water monitoring systems deployed in two of the three monitored kitchens.
Figure 5. The cold and hot water monitoring systems deployed in two of the three monitored kitchens.
Data 06 00026 g005
Figure 6. Underlying folder and file organization of FIKWater Dataset.
Figure 6. Underlying folder and file organization of FIKWater Dataset.
Data 06 00026 g006
Figure 7. Boxplots illustrating the distribution of the daily flows of water. Left: kitchen 1, Center: kitchen 2, Right: kitchen 3. The circles represent the smallest and highest outliers found in the data.
Figure 7. Boxplots illustrating the distribution of the daily flows of water. Left: kitchen 1, Center: kitchen 2, Right: kitchen 3. The circles represent the smallest and highest outliers found in the data.
Data 06 00026 g007
Figure 8. Evolution of the water consumption in kitchen 3 over 24 h. Top: flow_today; Bottom: flow_rate. Note that this data is plotted at the original sampling rate of 1 5 Hz.
Figure 8. Evolution of the water consumption in kitchen 3 over 24 h. Top: flow_today; Bottom: flow_rate. Note that this data is plotted at the original sampling rate of 1 5 Hz.
Data 06 00026 g008
Figure 9. Evolution of the water consumption over 48 h. Left: kitchen 1; Right: kitchen 2. Note that the data are plotted at different sampling rates, namely 1 60 Hz in kitchen 1, and 1 300 Hz in kitchen 2.
Figure 9. Evolution of the water consumption over 48 h. Left: kitchen 1; Right: kitchen 2. Note that the data are plotted at different sampling rates, namely 1 60 Hz in kitchen 1, and 1 300 Hz in kitchen 2.
Data 06 00026 g009
Figure 10. Total flow rate (hot + cold water) measurements supplemented with wet appliances transitions (kitchen 1, from 19 February 2019 to 20 February 2019). Note that this data is plotted at the sampling rate of 1 300 Hz.
Figure 10. Total flow rate (hot + cold water) measurements supplemented with wet appliances transitions (kitchen 1, from 19 February 2019 to 20 February 2019). Note that this data is plotted at the sampling rate of 1 300 Hz.
Data 06 00026 g010
Table 1. Main parameter of the TUF2000M ultrasonic flow meter.
Table 1. Main parameter of the TUF2000M ultrasonic flow meter.
ParameterValue
Accuracy≤1%
Velocity Range0 ~±10 m/s, bi-directional
Pipe SizeDN32 DN6000 mm
Pipe MaterialSteel, stainless steel, cast iron, copper, PVC, aluminum, etc.
Type of LiquidSingle liquid that can transmit ultrasound, such as water, sea water, and oil
Temperature~30 °C ~160 °C
Table 2. Details of the three deployments. The column S refers to the sampling interval.
Table 2. Details of the three deployments. The column S refers to the sampling interval.
IDServiceArea (m2)Capacity (Seats)StartEndS
1Dinner58.155015-02-201903-03-20195
2Dinner25.525012-03-201902-04-20195
3Breakf. and Dinner35.234016-04-201915-05-20195
Table 3. Column descriptions for the water demand files (<?>_demand.csv).
Table 3. Column descriptions for the water demand files (<?>_demand.csv).
ColumnDescriptionUnits
timestampThe timestamp when the record was collected
flow_rateWater flow ratem 3 /h
velocityWater velocitym/s
sound_speedSound speed in the waterm/s
flow_todayTotal water flow from 00:00 up to this momentm 3
flow_monthTotal water flow from the beginning of the month up to this momentm 3
Table 4. Column descriptions for the label files (<?>_labels.csv).
Table 4. Column descriptions for the label files (<?>_labels.csv).
ColumnDescriptionUnits
timestampThe timestamp when the label was recorded
modeIf the appliance is ON (0) or OFF (1) b i n a r y
Table 5. Column descriptions for the ground truth files (deployments.csv).
Table 5. Column descriptions for the ground truth files (deployments.csv).
ColumnDescriptionUnits
IDKitchen identifier n u m b e r
serviceType of service provided (Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner) t e x t
areaArea of the kitchen floorm 2
capacityMaximum number of customers in simultaneous n u m b e r
has_hot_waterIf hot water data are available or not b i n a r y
has_cold_waterIf cold water data are available or not b i n a r y
has_labelsIf the data contain wet appliance labels or not b i n a r y
startDate of the first measurement across all the waste bins d a t e t i m e
endDate of the last measurement across all the waste bins d a t e t i m e
Table 6. Number of monitoring days and total records in each of the monitored kitchens. The heatmap from blue to read indicates the data availability (dark blue—more data; dark red—less data).
Table 6. Number of monitoring days and total records in each of the monitored kitchens. The heatmap from blue to read indicates the data availability (dark blue—more data; dark red—less data).
IDDaysHot WaterCold WaterCoverage (%)
118289,541289,85198
225396,936393,67895
3>31>–>522,107>98
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, L.; Aguiar, V.; Vasconcelos, F. FIKWater: A Water Consumption Dataset from Three Restaurant Kitchens in Portugal. Data 2021, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6030026

AMA Style

Pereira L, Aguiar V, Vasconcelos F. FIKWater: A Water Consumption Dataset from Three Restaurant Kitchens in Portugal. Data. 2021; 6(3):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6030026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Lucas, Vitor Aguiar, and Fábio Vasconcelos. 2021. "FIKWater: A Water Consumption Dataset from Three Restaurant Kitchens in Portugal" Data 6, no. 3: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6030026

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop