Previous Issue
Volume 14, May
 
 

Dent. J., Volume 14, Issue 6 (June 2026) – 3 articles

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 3144 KB  
Article
Comparison of Color Stability Between PMMA and Graphene-Reinforced PMMA After Being Subjected to pH Changes and Coffee
by Ildefonso Serrano-Belmonte, Sergi Torné-Durán, Javier San Nicolás-Sánchez, Virginia Pérez-Fernández and Ascensión Martínez-Cánovas
Dent. J. 2026, 14(6), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14060319 - 22 May 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Provisional restorations are widely used in fixed prosthodontics, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) remains one of the most commonly used materials. Discoloration during intraoral service may compromise their esthetic acceptability. Graphene-reinforced PMMA has been introduced to improve material performance, although its color [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Provisional restorations are widely used in fixed prosthodontics, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) remains one of the most commonly used materials. Discoloration during intraoral service may compromise their esthetic acceptability. Graphene-reinforced PMMA has been introduced to improve material performance, although its color stability under simulated oral conditions remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to compare the color changes in conventional PMMA and graphene-reinforced PMMA after exposure to salivary pH variations and coffee, combined with simulated masticatory movements. Methods: Forty PMMA and forty graphene-reinforced PMMA (G-CAM) disk-shaped specimens (8 mm × 2 mm) were allocated to eight original experimental groups according to material and condition (pH 7, coffee, pH change, or pH change plus coffee), under simulated chewing movements. Color was recorded before and after the procedures using an imaging system, and values were converted into CIELAB coordinates. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis, and Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Both materials exhibited measurable color changes after the experimental procedures. PMMA showed higher median ΔE values than graphene-reinforced PMMA in the coffee and pH change plus coffee conditions, where the differences between materials were statistically significant. The highest color changes were observed in PMMA exposed to coffee and to the combined pH change plus coffee protocol, exceeding the clinical acceptability threshold. Conclusions: Graphene-reinforced PMMA (G-CAM) showed greater color stability than conventional PMMA, although neither material can be considered completely color stable. The greatest color variation was observed in the groups exposed to pH change followed by coffee immersion, as reflected by ΔE values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Dental Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1274 KB  
Article
Detecting Residual Root Canal Filling Material After Retreatment: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Microscopy Compared with Microcomputed Tomography
by Mohamad Alouda, Samar Akil, Mohammad Tamer Abbara, Ammar Eid, Imad-Addin Almasri, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah and Ziad D. Baghdadi
Dent. J. 2026, 14(6), 318; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14060318 - 22 May 2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Reliable detection of residual root canal filling material after retreatment is essential for comparing retreatment protocols. However, available methods quantify different clinical–physical dimensions and may not yield comparable estimates. This in vitro study compared cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital microscopy [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Reliable detection of residual root canal filling material after retreatment is essential for comparing retreatment protocols. However, available methods quantify different clinical–physical dimensions and may not yield comparable estimates. This in vitro study compared cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital microscopy (DGM) for detecting residual obturation material after retreatment, using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) as the reference standard. Methods: Fifteen extracted human mandibular premolars with single, straight canals were instrumented, obturated with gutta-percha and a calcium silicate-based sealer (AH Plus Bioceramic), and retreated with ProTaper Universal Retreatment files. Residual material was assessed in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds using CBCT (voxel size 0.10 mm), micro-CT (voxel size 60 µm), and DGM after longitudinal root splitting. Surface-based (DGM) and volumetric (CBCT and micro-CT) outcomes were analyzed separately using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values), and Cohen’s kappa for agreement. Results: DGM showed low median residual surface percentages across thirds (0.34–1.52%), whereas CBCT yielded higher median residual volume percentages (10.20–14.20%) than micro-CT (3.27–5.04%). The difference in the middle third between CBCT and micro-CT remained significant after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.002). For binary detection, CBCT showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity (overclassification of positive thirds), whereas DGM showed high specificity but limited sensitivity in the coronal and middle thirds. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this laboratory study, micro-CT was the most reliable reference method. CBCT tended to overestimate residual material, suggesting that clinical decisions based solely on CBCT may lead to unnecessary retreatment. DGM underestimated remnants because it assesses only the exposed split surface. These method-specific limitations should guide both clinical interpretation and future research design. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 789 KB  
Article
Retrospective Evaluation of the Topical Use of 1% Amitriptyline in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome
by Carmen Steffani Perez-Parrella, Juan Antonio Ruiz Roca, Eduardo Pons-Fuster and Pia López-Jornet
Dent. J. 2026, 14(6), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14060317 - 22 May 2026
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical response and tolerability of topical 1% amitriptyline in patients with burning mouth syndrome in a real-world clinical setting. Methodology: A retrospective observational study was conducted through a review of the [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical response and tolerability of topical 1% amitriptyline in patients with burning mouth syndrome in a real-world clinical setting. Methodology: A retrospective observational study was conducted through a review of the clinical histories of patients diagnosed with burning mouth syndrome, treated at the Dental Clinic of the Morales Meseguer Hospital (Murcia, Spain). All the patients were treated with topical amitriptyline for a period of four weeks. The following parameters were evaluated at the start of the treatment and at the end of the four weeks: pain or mouth burning, through the visual analog scale (VAS); anxiety and depression, with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale; sleepiness, with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS); sensation of dry mouth (VAS) and basal sialometry for the objective measurement of salivary flow. Results: Of the 32 patients that were initially included, 27 were ultimately analyzed. After 4 weeks of treatment with 1% topical amitriptyline, a significant improvement was observed in mouth pain or burning, measured with the VAS, with a decrease in the median of 7.5 (IQR 6–9) to 5 (IQR 5–7) (p < 0.001). Likewise, significant improvements were recorded in the anxiety (HAD-A) and depression (HAD-D) scores, with significant reductions after the treatment (p = 0.019 and p = 0.009, respectively). No statistically significant differences were observed in the subjective sensation of dry mouth (VAS) (p = 0.054) or in the total production of saliva (p = 0.477). Conclusions: Treatment with 1% topical amitriptyline for four weeks was associated with a reduction in pain and emotional distress in patients with burning mouth syndrome, with very few reported adverse effects. As an exploratory retrospective study with a limited sample size reflecting real-world clinical practice, these findings suggest that 1% topical amitriptyline may represent a useful therapeutic option in the management of burning mouth syndrome. However, the results should be interpreted with caution, and further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Back to TopTop