You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Processes
Download PDF
  • Editorial
  • Open Access

30 December 2025

Special Issue “Bioprocess Engineering: Sustainable Manufacturing for a Green Society”

and
1
BioRG—Bioengineering and Sustainability Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, Universidade Lusófona, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
2
Associate Laboratory i4HB—Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
3
iBB—Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
4
Department of Bioengineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Processes2026, 14(1), 135;https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14010135 
(registering DOI)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioprocess Engineering: Sustainable Manufacturing for a Green Society
Version Notes
Order Reprints
The transition from linear, resource-intensive production to circular, low-carbon manufacturing currently presents a major challenge. Conventional processes still demand high levels of both raw materials and energy while generating substantial waste, thus contributing to, for example, resource depletion, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions [1,2,3]. Bioprocess engineering offers a production alternative based on mild operational conditions, selective biocatalysis, and microbial diversity. It is supported by the knowledge gathered in more than a century of industrial fermentation, spanning processes from ethanol and citric acid production to antibiotics and recombinant proteins, and it is further enriched by historical developments in industrial biocatalysis, where enzymes have long been harnessed for selective biotransformation in, e.g., food, pharma and fine chemicals production [4,5,6]. When integrated with biorefinery concepts, bioprocesses can support circular economy strategies and accelerate the transition towards sustainable production of chemicals, fuels, materials, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceuticals [7,8,9]. Seminal literature on biorefineries, biocatalysis, and metabolic engineering underscores the key role of bioprocesses in decarbonized manufacturing [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
This Special Issue of Processes—Bioprocess Engineering: Sustainable Manufacturing for a Green Society—features five contributions that exemplify the transformative potential of the current research in this field to attain sound and sustainable production methods. They include examples of the isolation and screening of new biocatalysts and activities, enzyme immobilization and stabilization, and new applications such as the production of composite materials and analytical methods.
Marine microbiomes provide an underexplored area of biocatalysts. In the study published in this Special Issue, two isolates, Bacillus subtilis HR05 and Shewanella algae HR06, which coexist with the alga Ulva flexuosa, were found to produce xylanases with the highest activities among those isolated [18]. These results are in accordance with the growing evidence for marine biocatalysts usage in biorefineries, food processing, and specialty chemicals, where salinity tolerance and unique catalytic profiles are advantageous [19,20,21]. Industries which could benefit from these xylanases include food industries and pulp and paper production due to their high activity and optimal alkaline pH.
Smith et al. developed natural fiber composites exemplifying the convergence of materials science and bioprocessing [22]. In this study, self-cultured bacterial-retted fibers from hemp were formed into a fiber mat (BGM) and laminated with polylactic acid (PLA) sheets. The 100% biodegradable hemp BFM/PLA composites were not as uniform as desired, but optimization of the fiber-to-matrix ratio can enhance mechanical and thermal performance, positioning these composites as credible alternatives to synthetic fiber-reinforced polymers. This is in accordance with the broader trajectory of bio-based polymers and natural fiber composites reported in the literature, where PLA and lignocellulosic fibers have been shown to enable weight reduction, lower embodied energy, and promote end-of-life compostability [23,24,25,26].
For a given enzyme to be used at production scale, it must be active and stable under highly demanding industrial conditions. Process-ready enzymes depend on architectures that enhance stability, reusability, and synergistic activity. Immobilization of enzymes increases their stability, allows their reuse, facilitates process control and product recovery, and enhances product yield and quality. In the review article of this Special Issue, the authors provide an integrated perspective on (multi)enzyme immobilization, while critically evaluate immobilization methods and carriers and biocatalyst metrics [27]. The impact of key carrier features on biocatalyst performance is discussed, as well as the novel trends towards miniaturization. Illustrative examples that are representative of biocatalytic applications promoting sustainability are presented. In the last two decades, seminal work demonstrating how support chemistry, pore structure, and oriented immobilization modulate mass transfer, activity, selectivity, and stability has been published, resulting in improved catalytic performance [17,28,29,30,31,32,33].
In another study published in the Special Issue, the authors explored triazine-scaffolded solid-phase lead ligands to improve cutinase-related enzymes through affinity-like immobilization [34]. The biomimetic affinity support increased thermal stability of the immobilized cutinase through tailored ligand–protein interactions, and the study extended this concept to multiple lipases and to an invertase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These findings complement established strategies for enzyme stabilization, such as immobilization, chemical modification, and medium engineering, and underscore the importance of rational ligand design for robustness at elevated temperatures [35,36,37,38,39].
The advancement of cost-effective analytical platforms for bioprocess monitoring is fundamental to ensuring product quality and regulatory compliance [40]. In one of the Special Issue papers, the authors compared a benchtop Fourier Transform (FT) near-infrared (NIR) spectrometer with a prototype of a portable, miniaturized NIR spectrometer (miniNIR) to detect and quantify (i) biodiesel contaminants and (ii) biodiesel in diesel [41]. Models using principal component analysis–linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) provided good accuracies, suggesting that the low cost, portable device has potential for the preliminary analysis of biodiesel. The work contributes to the maturation of process analytics for biodiesel, complementing standards [42] and fostering applications beyond laboratory settings toward point-of-use and inline controls [43].
Taken together, the manuscripts of the Special Issue address the main challenges in biocatalysis and bioprocess engineering, from enzyme discovery to stabilization, and application and process integration, even in new fields.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, P.F.; writing—review and editing, P.F. and C.C.C.R.d.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors would like to thank all authors and reviewers for their contributions to the Special Issue “Bioprocess Engineering: Sustainable Manufacturing for a Green Society”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Geng, D.; Evans, S. A Literature Review of Energy Waste in the Manufacturing Industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 173, 108713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jung, S.; Kara, L.B.; Nie, Z.; Simpson, T.W.; Whitefoot, K.S. Is Additive Manufacturing an Environmentally and Economically Preferred Alternative for Mass Production? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 6373–6386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Eelager, M.P.; Dalbanjan, N.P.; Madihalli, S.; Madar, M.; Agadi, N.P.; Korganokar, K.; Kiran, B.K. Pathways to a Sustainable Future: Exploring the Synergy between Sustainability and Circular Economy. Sustain. Futures 2025, 10, 101208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.-H.P.; Sun, J.; Ma, Y. Biomanufacturing: History and Perspective. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 773–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Heckmann, C.M.; Paradisi, F. Looking Back: A Short History of the Discovery of Enzymes and How They Became Powerful Chemical Tools. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 6082–6102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vasic-Racki, D. History of Industrial Biotransformations—Dreams and Realities. In Industrial Biotransformations; Wiley: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp. 1–36. [Google Scholar]
  7. Leong, H.Y.; Chang, C.-K.; Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Chia, S.R.; Lim, J.W.; Chang, J.-S.; Show, P.L. Waste Biorefinery towards a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy: A Solution to Global Issues. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ioannidou, S.M.; Pateraki, C.; Ladakis, D.; Papapostolou, H.; Tsakona, M.; Vlysidis, A.; Kookos, I.K.; Koutinas, A. Sustainable Production of Bio-Based Chemicals and Polymers via Integrated Biomass Refining and Bioprocessing in a Circular Bioeconomy Context. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 307, 123093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huy, M.; Kristin Vatland, A.; Kumar, G. Nutraceutical Productions from Microalgal Derived Compounds via Circular Bioeconomy Perspective. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 347, 126575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Intasian, P.; Prakinee, K.; Phintha, A.; Trisrivirat, D.; Weeranoppanant, N.; Wongnate, T.; Chaiyen, P. Enzymes, In Vivo Biocatalysis, and Metabolic Engineering for Enabling a Circular Economy and Sustainability. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10367–10451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kamm, B.; Kamm, M. Principles of Biorefineries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 64, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nielsen, J.; Keasling, J.D. Engineering Cellular Metabolism. Cell 2016, 164, 1185–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Boodhoo, K.V.K.; Flickinger, M.C.; Woodley, J.M.; Emanuelsson, E.A.C. Bioprocess Intensification: A Route to Efficient and Sustainable Biocatalytic Transformations for the Future. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2022, 172, 108793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Calvo-Flores, F.G.; Martin-Martinez, F.J. Biorefineries: Achievements and Challenges for a Bio-Based Economy. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 973417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Molina-Espeja, P.; Sanz-Aparicio, J.; Golyshin, P.N.; Robles-Martín, A.; Guallar, V.; Beltrametti, F.; Müller, M.; Yakimov, M.M.; Modregger, J.; van Logchem, M.; et al. Enzymes for Consumer Products to Achieve Climate Neutrality. Oxf. Open Clim. Change 2023, 3, kgad003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buller, R.; Lutz, S.; Kazlauskas, R.J.; Snajdrova, R.; Moore, J.C.; Bornscheuer, U.T. From Nature to Industry: Harnessing Enzymes for Biocatalysis. Science 2023, 382, eadh8615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Basso, A.; Serban, S. Industrial Applications of Immobilized Enzymes—A Review. Mol. Catal. 2019, 479, 110607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pasalari, A.; Homaei, A. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Xylanase-Producing Bacteria from Ulva Flexuosa of the Persian Gulf. Processes 2022, 10, 1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Trincone, A. Enzymatic Processes in Marine Biotechnology. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghattavi, S.; Homaei, A. Marine Enzymes: Classification and Application in Various Industries. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 230, 123136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Birolli, W.G.; Lima, R.N.; Porto, A.L.M. Applications of Marine-Derived Microorganisms and Their Enzymes in Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, the Underexplored Potentials. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smith, L.M.; Fu, Y.; Pittala, R.K.; Wang, X.; Jabel, C.; Masignag, K.; Arellanes, J.; Ghosh, M.; Shi, S.Q.; Ecker, M.; et al. Bacterial-Retted Hemp Fiber/PLA Composites. Processes 2025, 13, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Santos, C.M.; Santos, T.F.; Rao, H.J.; Silva, F.H.V.A.; Mavinkere Rangappa, S.; Boonyasopon, P.; Siengchin, S.; Souza, D.F.S.; Nascimento, J.H.O. A Bibliometric Review on Applications of Lignocellulosic Fibers in Polymeric and Hybrid Composites: Trends and Perspectives. Heliyon 2024, 10, e38264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hemmati, F.; Farizeh, T.; Mohammadi-Roshandeh, J. Lignocellulosic Fiber-Reinforced PLA Green Composites: Effects of Chemical Fiber Treatment. In Biocomposite Materials; Sultan, M.T.H., Majid, M.S.A., Jamir, M.R.M., Azmi, A.I., Saba, N., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 97–204. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cruz Fabian, D.R.; Durpekova, S.; Dusankova, M.; Cisar, J.; Drohsler, P.; Elich, O.; Borkova, M.; Cechmankova, J.; Sedlarik, V. Renewable Poly(Lactic Acid)Lignocellulose Biocomposites for the Enhancement of the Water Retention Capacity of the Soil. Polymers 2023, 15, 2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ilyas, R.; Zuhri, M.; Aisyah, H.; Asyraf, M.; Hassan, S.; Zainudin, E.; Sapuan, S.; Sharma, S.; Bangar, S.; Jumaidin, R.; et al. Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polylactic Acid, Polylactic Acid Blends and Their Composites for Advanced Applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bié, J.; Sepodes, B.; Fernandes, P.C.B.; Ribeiro, M.H.L. Enzyme Immobilization and Co-Immobilization: Main Framework, Advances and Some Applications. Processes 2022, 10, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sheldon, R.A.; van Pelt, S. Enzyme Immobilisation in Biocatalysis: Why, What and How. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6223–6235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Maghraby, Y.R.; El-Shabasy, R.M.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Azzazy, H.M.E.-S. Enzyme Immobilization Technologies and Industrial Applications. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 5184–5196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robescu, M.S.; Bavaro, T. A Comprehensive Guide to Enzyme Immobilization: All You Need to Know. Molecules 2025, 30, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodrigues, R.C.; Ortiz, C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Torres, R.; Fernández-Lafuente, R. Modifying Enzyme Activity and Selectivity by Immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6290–6307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bolivar, J.M.; Woodley, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Is Enzyme Immobilization a Mature Discipline? Some Critical Considerations to Capitalize on the Benefits of Immobilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 6251–6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kothalawala, S.G.; Jiao, J.; Speight, R.; Song, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J. Pore Architecture Influences the Enzyme Immobilization Performance of Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 338, 111963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferreira-Faria, D.; Taipa, M.Â. Thermal Stabilization of Lipases Bound to Solid-Phase Triazine-Scaffolded Biomimetic Ligands: A Preliminary Assessment. Processes 2024, 12, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mateo, C.; Palomo, J.M.; Fernandez-Lorente, G.; Guisan, J.M.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Improvement of Enzyme Activity, Stability and Selectivity via Immobilization Techniques. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 40, 1451–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rueda, N.; dos Santos, J.C.S.; Ortiz, C.; Torres, R.; Barbosa, O.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Berenguer-Murcia, Á.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R. Chemical Modification in the Design of Immobilized Enzyme Biocatalysts: Drawbacks and Opportunities. Chem. Rec. 2016, 16, 1436–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Castillo, E.; Casas-Godoy, L.; Sandoval, G. Medium-Engineering: A Useful Tool for Modulating Lipase Activity and Selectivity. Biocatalysis 2016, 1, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wahab, W.A.A. Review of Research Progress in Immobilization and Chemical Modification of Microbial Enzymes and Their Application. Microb. Cell Fact. 2025, 24, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kabir, A.; Honda, R.P.; Kamatari, Y.O.; Endo, S.; Fukuoka, M.; Kuwata, K. Effects of Ligand Binding on the Stability of Aldo–Keto Reductases: Implications for Stabilizer or Destabilizer Chaperones. Protein Sci. 2016, 25, 2132–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gargalo, C.L.; Udugama, I.; Pontius, K.; Lopez, P.C.; Nielsen, R.F.; Hasanzadeh, A.; Mansouri, S.S.; Bayer, C.; Junicke, H.; Gernaey, K. V Towards Smart Biomanufacturing: A Perspective on Recent Developments in Industrial Measurement and Monitoring Technologies for Bio-Based Production Processes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 47, 947–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Monteiro, L.L.; Zoio, P.; Carvalho, B.B.; Fonseca, L.P.; Calado, C.R.C. Quality Monitoring of Biodiesel and Diesel/Biodiesel Blends: A Comparison between Benchtop FT-NIR versus a Portable Miniaturized NIR Spectroscopic Analysis. Processes 2023, 11, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barabás, I.; Todorut, I.-A. Biodiesel Quality, Standards and Properties. In Biodiesel: Quality, Emissions and By-Products; Montero, G., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 3–28. ISBN 9789533077840. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gullifa, G.; Barone, L.; Papa, E.; Giuffrida, A.; Materazzi, S.; Risoluti, R. Portable NIR Spectroscopy: The Route to Green Analytical Chemistry. Front. Chem. 2023, 11, 1214825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Download PDF
Safety Behavior Recognition for Substation Operations Based on a Dual-Path Spatiotemporal Network
Previous