Next Article in Journal
Application of Multidimensional Structural Equations in the Emergency Management of Coal Mine Accidents
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial on Special Issue “Natural Products for Drug Discovery and Development”
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Plant Surfactants as Cleaning Agents in Shampoo Formulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analogues of Oxamate, Pyruvate, and Lactate as Potential Inhibitors of Plasmodium knowlesi Lactate Dehydrogenase Identified Using Virtual Screening and Verified via Inhibition Assays
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation, Structural Elucidation, In Vitro Anti-α-Glucosidase, Anti-β-Secretase, and In Silico Studies of Bioactive Compound Isolated from Syzygium cumini L.

1
Department of Chemistry, College of Science and Arts, Qassim University, Ar Rass 51921, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Swabi, Swabi, Anbar 23561, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
3
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah P.O. Box 42, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Biochemistry, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan 23200, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
5
Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, P.O. Box 344, Al-Medinah Al-Monawara 41411, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah P.O. Box 751, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2023, 11(3), 880; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030880
Submission received: 15 January 2023 / Revised: 26 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 15 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products for Drug Discovery and Development)

Abstract

:
Diabetes is one of the main health issues worldwide because of its lifetime duration. To overcome this health problem, the current study was conducted. This investigation aims to explore the α-glucosidase and β-secretase potential of extract/fractions and pure isolated compounds of Syzygium cumini bark. The chloroform extract of Syzygium cumini bark was subjected to chromatographic analysis to yield compound 1. The structure of isolated phytochemical (1) was conducted using advanced spectroscopic analysis. Among test extracts, the chloroform fraction exhibited a significant effect against α-glucosidase with a % activity of 86.20% and an IC50 of 77.09 µM, while the isolated compound exhibited a promising effect with a % activity of 91.54 and an IC50 value of 17.54 μM. The extract/fractions and isolated compound 1 also showed promising effects against the β-secretase enzyme, having % effects of 83.21 and 91.54% with IC50 values of 318.76 and 17.54 μM, respectively. The extract/fractions and compound 1 were found to possess promising inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase and β-secretase. This research project opens a new avenue for research into detailed chemical and biological studies on Syzygium cumini to isolate bioactive enzyme inhibitors. Furthermore, the isolated compound 1 friedelin was docked into the active site of β-secretase and α-glucosidase. The molecular docking was assessed using molecular docking via the MOE-Dock tool. The docking results showed good docking scores of −6.84 and −6.46 when docked against β-secretase and α-glucosidase, respectively, and strong interactions.

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants have been used as traditional medicines for the treatment of various diseases around the world. Compounds derived from these plants have been extensively studied for their pharmacological properties and potential as novel drugs [1,2,3]. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in investigating the therapeutic potential of plants found in different regions of the world [4,5]. Many wild plants have been shown to possess therapeutic properties and are widely used in traditional home remedies and as raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry [6,7]. Syzygium cumini, a member of the Myrtaceae family, is a tropical evergreen tree also known as black plum (Jaman). This plant is known for its fruits, woods, and decorative value. It is native to India and the neighboring regions of Southeast Asia, Sri Lanka, and Myanmar and can grow up to 30 m in height with a lifespan of over 100 years [8,9,10,11,12]. The unripe fruit juice of S. cumini is used for the preparation of vinegar and is considered to be carminative, stomachic, and diuretic, while the ripe fruit is used for the creation of conservation, squashes, and jellies. The leaves of this plant have been used in traditional medicine as a remedy for diabetes mellitus in many countries [13,14,15]. The leaves are used to improve the health of teeth and gums and to cure fever, gastropathy, strangury, dermopathy leucorrhea, diabetes, and stomachalgia [16]. The fruit, bark, and leaves of this plant have been found to have anti-diabetic properties due to the presence of various phytochemicals such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and anthocyanins. Studies have shown that S. cumini and its isolated compound friedelin have a hypoglycemic effect on individuals with type 2 diabetes. The plant has been found to reduce fasting blood sugar levels, improve insulin sensitivity, and lower oxidative stress in diabetic individuals [17]. It is thought that this is achieved through the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, two enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism [18,19]. In addition, S. cumini and friedelin have also been found to have anti-Alzheimer effects. The plant has been found to reduce the accumulation of beta-amyloid protein in the brain, which is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease. It is thought that the anti-Alzheimer effects are due to the antioxidant properties of the plant, which protect the brain from oxidative stress and neuronal damage. S. cumini and its isolated compound friedelin have a potential therapeutic effect on both diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. [1,2,3]. Friedelin is also documented as having hypolipidemic [4], analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic properties [5]. Friedelin is a pentacyclic triterpenoid, which is perhydropicene that is substituted by an oxo group at position 3 and methyl (CH3) groups at positions 4, 4a, 6b, 8a, 11, 11, 12b, and 14a. It has previously been isolated from Ageratum conyzoides, Azima tetracantha Lam, and Maytenus ilicifolia [18,19,20]. It has been reported as an antipyretic, an anti-diarrheal, and a free radical scavenger and also possesses live protective effects [18,20]. Friedelin extracted from Ageratum conyzoides has been shown to reduce inflammation in rabbit eyes, while isolated from Aucuba jabonica possess excellent anti-inflammatory effect in various models such as histamine- and carrageenan-induced paw oedema models [18]. Friedelin is also previously documented for excellent antimicrobial activity [20].
This study aimed to isolate, characterize, and evaluate the bioactivity of compounds present in S. cumini concerning α-glucosidase and β-secretase activities. This study involved the isolation of bioactive compounds from S. cumini L. using various chromatographic techniques. The structures of the isolated compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic and other analytical methods. In vitro, α-glucosidase and β-secretase inhibitory activities of the compounds were evaluated. In silico studies were also carried out to explore the molecular interactions of the compounds with the target enzymes. The outcome of this study provided insight into the therapeutic potential of Syzygium cumini L and its active compounds for the management of diseases related to α-glucosidase and β-secretase activities.

2. Results

2.1. Structure Elucidation of Compound 1

Compound 1, namely friedelin, was isolated from chloroform-soluble fractions of S. cumini bark. The chemical structure of the isolated compound (1; Figure 1) was elucidated by advanced spectroscopic techniques. The exact molecular formula of compound 1 was determined to be C30H50O from the HREI-MS spectrum, which exhibited the [M]+ peak at m/z 426.3861 (calculated as MW 426.3911). The 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra showed characteristic resonances for 30 carbons, including 8 CH3, 11 CH2, f4our CH, and 7 C. Similarly, 1H-NMR showed seven methyl groups appearing as a singlet and one methyl doublet, all in the up-field region ranges between δ 0.73 and 1.18 ppm. The methine protons appeared at C-4 as a quartet at δ 2.23 ppm, at C-8 as a doublet of doublets (dd) at δ 1.38 ppm, and at C-18 as a multiplet at δ 1.54 ppm. The broadband 13C-NMR spectra also showed the presence of carbonyl carbon (C=O) at δ 213.4 ppm. Detailed 1H and 13C-NMR data are presented in Table 1. The HMBC spectra also showed a correlation of methyl protons (H-23, δ 1.01 ppm) with C-5 (δ 38.0 ppm) and C-3 (δ 213.4 ppm), a correlation of other methyl protons (H-28, δ 1.18 ppm) with C-9 (δ 37.1 ppm) and C-8 (δ 53.2 ppm), while methyl protons (H-26, 27, δ 1.01, 1.05 ppm) showed correlations with C-13 (δ 38.3 ppm), 14 (δ 39.6 ppm) and 15 (δ 32.2 ppm). The methylene protons (H-2, δ 2.27/2.37 ppm) showed correlations with carbonyl carbon (C-3, C=O, δ 213.4 ppm), and methine carbon (C-10, δ 59.5 ppm). Detailed HMBC correlations are presented in Figure 2. The structure of friedelin (1) was identified by comparing the spectra data with previously reported data [21,22].

2.2. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Effects

The α-glucosidase-inhibiting potential of crude extract and various fractions are given in Table 2. Among the tested extract/fractions the chloroform fraction exhibited promising effects with a % activity of 86.20% with an IC50 of 77.09 µM, while friedelin exhibited a promising effect with a % activity of 91.54 and an IC50 value of 17.54 μM.

2.3. β-Secretase Inhibitory Effects

The results of the β-secretase-inhibiting activity are displayed in Table 3. The extract/fractions and isolated compoun1 also showed promising effects against the β-secretase enzyme having % effects of 83.21 and 91.54% with IC50 values of 318.76 and 17.54 μM, respectively.

2.4. Docking Results

The isolated compound was docked into the active site of β-secretase and α-glucosidase. The docking scores of the compounds were revealed as −6.84 and −6.46 when docked against β-secretase and α-glucosidase, respectively. The compound formed a total of two H-donor interactions with active site residue PRO 70 and one H–pi interaction with TRP 197 residue. The interaction was further compared to the reference compound berberine chloride, which indicates that the reference compound of β-secretase forms one hydrogen bond donor, one hydrogen bond acceptor, and one H–pi interaction with a docking score of 6.621. The docking analysis of friedelin against α-glucosidase revealed that the compound formed a total of three H-donor interactions with the active site residues including ASP 231, ASP 233, and CYS 172. Furthermore, the reference compound acarbose was docked in the active site (glucosidase), where it formed three non-covalent interactions with the docking of −6.3214. Table 4 shows the docking score, interactions, energy, and distance of the compound against β-secretase and α-glucosidase. The 3D interactions of the compound within the active site of both receptors are present in Figure 3.

2.5. ADMET Prediction

ADMET analysis has been carried out for the selected compound with effective IC50 value and good docking score. The compound obeyed Lipinski’s rules of five, according to which “a drug like compound must not have hydrogen bond acceptor more than 10, hydrogen bond donor not more than 5, water octanol coefficient not more than 10 and molecular weight must be less than 500 Daltons”. It also has good ADMET properties in the required allotted limit. Table 5 shows the Lipinski rule of five and Table 6 shows the ADMET properties.

3. Discussion

The chloroform-soluble fraction (22 g) of Syzygium cumini was subjected to repeated normal phase column chromatography using (hexane and EtOAc (85:15) as a mobile phase to yield compound 1 (Figure 4). The chemical structure of compound 1 was determined by using advanced spectroscopic analysis [22].
Worldwide, the problem of diabetes mellitus is becoming alarming. Although a lot of antidiabetic molecules are in use for the treatment or management of diabetic mellitus, diabetes is still not controlled around the world. This failure of treatment is mostly associated with the side effects of available antidiabetic drugs which lead to poor compliance and the disease consequently entering its worst stage. To cope with these problems the search for new, effective, and safe antidiabetic molecules is a great task and challenge for medicinal chemists. The current research aims to find a good antihyperglycemic agent. Diabetes is accompanied by an increased blood glucose level and is considered a metabolic disorder. In this disorder, the beta cells of the pancreas produced deficient insulin [23]. In diabetes patients, several problems arise which comprise micro- and macrovascular dysfunctions [24] or problems which curing using insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents and without side effects is very difficult [25]. α-Glucosidase inhibitors including carbose and miglitol, and miglitol is also involved in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetes mellitus patients [25]. To overcome the side effects and poor compliance with existing antidiabetics, several bioactive compounds derived from plants have been used for the treatment of diabetes alone or in combination with hypoglycemic agents [26]. Various parts of Syzygium cumini have been used in traditional systems for the curing of diabetes [27]. The main objective of this investigation was to validate the folk usage of Syzygium cumini for the treatment of diabetes and other disorder [28,29,30]. The results of the α-glucosidase-inhibiting effects indicated that in the number of tested extracts, the chloroform extract showed an inhibitory effect of 86.20% with an IC50 value of 77.09, while the methanol extract showed excellent inhibitory activity at 79.32% with an IC50 value of 87.54 µM. Among the tested samples, the isolated compounds showed a significant effect of 95.34% with an IC50 of 17.54 µM in comparison to the standard drug, which has an effect of 91.34% and an IC50 value of 23.07 µM. β-secretase, commonly known as the β-site AAP-cleaving enzyme, has been documented to be a transmembrane aspartic protease [31]. β-secretase is mainly involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [27]. BACE-1 is mainly responsible for the cleavage of AAP and the connected formation of β-amyloid, which is also associated with AD [32,33]. The discovery of a new and novel β-secretase inhibitor is an important therapeutic strategy for curing AD. Therefore, hexane, chloroform, and methanol extracts were screened for their β-secretase-inhibiting potential. Among the tested extracts, the chloroform extract showed an excellent effect of 83.21% with an IC50 value of 318.76 µM, followed by the methanol extract of 66.87% with an IC50 value of 364.65 µM. Compound 1 was found to be the most potent against BACE1, with a percentage inhibition of 91.54 and an IC50 value of 17.54 μM. The standard drug showed a 94.39 % effect with an IC50 value of 280.54 µM.
The inhibitory activity of friedelin was further validated by molecular docking analysis. The findings of the docking analysis reflect the strong inhibitory potential of friedelin by forming four hydrogen bond interactions in the active site residues. The ADMET prediction shows that this compound is not toxic and can be used as a drug molecule. The promising α-glucosidase- and β-secretase-inhibiting effects of compound 1 validate the traditional usage of Syzygium cumini for the treatment of diabetes and AD. In addition to the above aspect of this isolated compound, the ADMET study also showed good aspects. Conducting an ADMET study is very essential for the research of all molecules to save money as well as time. The journey of drug discovery is time-consuming as well as expensive. To save both time and money, using the best ADMET model is vital. In current study, a good GIT absorption was calculated from online software. A significant oral absorption makes a drug better with respect to the formulation of various dosage forms. Regarding distribution, the prediction of CNS and BBB distribution also makes a drug more attractive. The isolated compound was also found with no hepatotoxicity or skin toxicity, and AMES toxicity was also not predicted. However, further mechanistic studies are recommended.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Collections

The bark of Syzygium cumini was obtained from the University of Swabi, KP, Pakistan. The specimen was identified by Dr. Muhammad Ilyas, Botany Department, Swabi University. The voucher specimen No. UOS/Bot103 of the collected plant was dropped in the herbarium of the Department of Botany Swabi University, Pakistan.

4.2. Extraction and Isolation

Ten kilograms of dried plant material was ground into a powder and subjected to cold extraction via maceration using 70% methanol as the solvent. The extraction was carried out at room temperature or slightly lower, but not heated, for a duration of two weeks. The resulting extract was then filtered and subjected to rotary evaporation under ambient temperature and pressure, which yielded a crude extract weighing 107 g. The obtained extract was suspended in distilled water and treated with a polar and non-polar solvent which yielded hexane 32.98 g, chloroform 41.09 g, and methanolic extracts 44.98 g. Among the chloroform fractions, 22 g was assessed for column chromatography analysis using silica gel. The column was eluted with a mixture of two solvents (hexane and EtOAc; 85:15), which yielded a white needle-like crystalline compound 1. The compound was purified by recrystallization in a mixture of hexane and acetone to obtain 99.94% pure compound 1 (Figure 4). The structure of the isolated compound was determined by using advanced spectroscopic analysis [22,34].

4.3. α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Screening

The α-glucosidase-inhibiting potential of extract/fractions and isolated compound 1 was performed according to the reported procedure [35]. A sonication of rat intestinal (CH3)2 acetone powder in saline having ration w/v (100:1) was conducted. Then, the supernatant was used as a wellspring of basic intestinal α-glucosidase after centrifugation. The solution for bioassay comprises 100 µL of each extract, fraction, or isolated compound (5 mg/mL) in dimethyl sulfoxide that was recreated in 100 µL of 100 mm phosphate buffer (pH = 6.8) in 96-well plates. The reaction mixture was hatched with intestinal α-glucosidase for five minutes with a 50 µL substrate (5 mM, p-nitrophenyl-a-D-glucopyranoside) as per the reported method. The substrate was mixed and the difference in absorbance at 400 nm was recorded by using a spectrophotometer. The screen extract/fractions and isolated compound 1 were substituted with DMSO (7.5%) in the control. The standard used in this assay was acarbose. The percentage effects were determined with the help of the below formula:
% effect = 100-OD test well × 100/OD control.

4.4. β-Secretase Inhibitory Screening

The β-secretase-inhibiting effect of crude extract/fractions and the isolated compound was determined as per the reported method [30]. Buffer solution (82.5 µL) comprising sodium acetate buffer (50 mM) and having a pH of 4.50 was combined with every inhibitor in the wells, and then 2.5 µL of the stock solution of the enzyme was mixed in. The incubation of the reaction mixture was performed at 25 °C for 20 min. In the combined solution, the reaction will be started by adding 62.5 nM from the stock solution of the substrate. This solution was re-incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. Once the incubation of the 96-well plates was completed, 1000 nM of extracts/compounds solution from stock solution was added, and the incubation time of the plates was recorded with the help of a fluorometer machine according to the previously reported procedure [36]. The excitation and emissions for MCa are 325 and 400 nm, respectively.

4.5. Docking Methodology

The PDB structure of β-secretase receptors (PDB ID) was downloaded from the RCS PDB database and due to the non-availability of the 3D structure of α-glucosidase, the previously modeled structure by our lab group was used for the docking study. The target protein cannot be used for molecular docking directly because the structure might be coupled to heavy atoms, water, ligands, or cofactors. The water molecules were removed and polar charges were added to the structure [37]. The energy of both receptors was reduced using the default MOE energy minimization algorithm parameters (gradient: 0.05; force field: MMFF94X). The friedelin structures were built using the MOE-Builder module, and all structures were energy minimized. For the molecular docking studies, the default parameters of the MOE-Dock program were employed. The ligands were permitted to be flexible to determine the proper conformations of the ligands [38]. The best ligand conformations were examined for their binding interactions after docking using MOE and PyMol software [39].

4.6. ADMET Prediction Methodology

Ongoing drug discovery and design is a large economical risk if it is faced with some failures in different stages of development. These failures may be because of deficiencies in the drug’s efficacy and safety, mainly related to its absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) properties and different toxicities (T). Therefore, the use of ADMET modelling is essential to lessen the chances of failure in drug discovery and development. pkCSM is an online server that easily performs six types of drug-likeness analyses including the Lipinski rule of five and a prediction model, 31 ADMET points analysis consisting of 3 basic properties, 6 absorptions, 3 distributions, 10 metabolisms, 2 excretions, and 7 toxicities. pkCSM provides free online server access at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/pkcsm/prediction.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

ANOVA software was used for statistical analysis. All data are presented as the mean ± SEM of three experimental results.

5. Conclusions

Phytochemicals derived from medicinal plants provide a promising molecular scaffold for novel drug development keeping in view their traditional uses of S. cumini for the treatment of diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease. The extract, fractions, and isolated compound 1 have significant α-glucosidase-inhibiting and β-secretase-inhibiting potential compared to standard drugs. In this project, the chloroform fraction and compound 1 exhibited excellent α-glucosidase and β-secretase inhibitory effects which could be used as excellent pharmacophore templates for novel drug discovery/development. The docking study revealed significant interactions of friedelin against the target protein’s binding site. Therefore, this compound might be an effective therapeutic candidate and might be effective against β-secretase and α-glucosidase.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and A.R.; methodology, S.B. (Sami Bawazeer).; software, A.W.; validation, H.A.H.; formal analysis, S.B. (Saud Bawazeer).; investigation, A.R.; resources, A.M.; data curation, S.B. (Saud Bawazeer).; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.H.; writing—review and editing, A.R.; visualization, S.B. (Sami Bawazeer).; supervision, A.W.; project administration, S.B. (Sami Bawazeer).; funding acquisition, A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number (QU-lF-05-04-28604). The authors give thanks to Qassim University for technical support.

Data Availability Statement

The data associated with this paper are given in the main text of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education, and Qassim University, Saudi Arabia [QU-lF-05-04-28604]. The authors also thank Qassim University for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Rauf, A.; Khan, I.A.; Muhammad, N.; Al-Awthan, Y.S.; Bahattab, O.; Israr, M.; Mubarak, M.S. Phytochemical composition, in vitro urease, α-glucosidase and phosphodiesterase inhibitory potency of Syzygium cumini (Jamun) fruits. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 143, 418–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mubassara, S.; Biswas, K.K.; Hasan, M.M.; Hossain, M.I.; Paul, S. In Vitro Phytochemical, Antibacterial and Antioxidant analysis in different plant part of Syzium cumini. Int. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. Res. 2015, 7, 150–155. [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh, R.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Rani, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, P. Ethnobotanical study of Subhartipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. I. Diversity and pharmacological significance of trees. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2019, 11, 782–794. [Google Scholar]
  4. Singh, R.; Upadhyay, S.K. Phytodiversity of wild flora from Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana Ambala, Haryana. India. Bull. Pure Appl. Sci. 2018, 37, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, R.; Upadhyay, S.K.; Rani, A.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, A. Ethanobotanical study of Subhartipuram, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. II. Diversity and Pharmacological significance of shrubs and climbers. Int. J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 12, 383–393. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rates, S.M. Plants as source of drugs. Toxicology 2001, 39, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nayami, D.W.; Arika, W.; Ogola, P.E.; Njagi, E.N.M.; Ngugi, M.P. Medically Important Phytochemicals—A review. J. Pharmacog. Phytochem. Res. 2016, 4, 35–49. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sinha, K.; Mishra, N.P.; Singh, J.; Khanuja, S.P. Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi): A reservoir plant for therapeutic applications: A review. Indian J. Trad. Know. 2004, 3, 257–270. [Google Scholar]
  9. Singh, S.; Pandey, S.C.; Srivastava, S.; Gupta, V.S.; Patro, B.; Ghosh, A.C. Chemistry and Medicinal Properties of Tinospora cordifolia. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2003, 35, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mervat, M.M.E.F.; Hanan, A.A.T. Antioxidant activities, total anthocyanins, phenolics and flavor- noids contents of some sweet potato genotypes under stress of different concentrations of sucrose and sorbitol. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2009, 3, 3609–3616. [Google Scholar]
  11. Patel, R.K.; Patel, J.B.; Trivedi, P.D. Spectrophotometric method for the estimation of total alkaloids in the Tinospora cordifolia M. and its herbal formulations. Inter. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 7, 249–251. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, J.Y.; Yoon, J.W.; Kim, C.T.; Lim, S.T. Antioxidant activity of phenylpropanoid esters isolated and identified from Platycodon grandiflorum A. DC. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 3033–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wealth of India. Raw Materials; CSIR: New Delhi, India, 1976; Volume X, pp. 100–104. [Google Scholar]
  14. Atta, U.; Zaman, K. Medicinal plants with hypoglycemic activity. J. Ethanopharmacol. 1989, 26, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Texixeri, C.C.; Rava, C.A.; Silva, P.M.; Melchior, R.; Argenta, R.; Anselmi, F.; Almeida, C.R.C.; Fuchs, F.D. Absence of antihyperglycemic effect of jamboloan in experimental and clinical models. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 71, 343–347. [Google Scholar]
  16. Warrier, P.K.; Nambiar, V.P.K.; Ramankutty, C. Indian Medicinal Plants; Orient Longaman, Ltd.: Bengaluru, India, 1996; pp. 225–228. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hussein, J.; El-Khayat, Z.; Taha, M.; Morsy, S.; Drees, E.; Khateeb, S. Insulin resistance and oxidative stress in diabetic rats treated with flaxseed oil. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 5499–5506. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sunil, C.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Al-Dhabi, N.A. Antioxidant, free radical scavenging and liver protective effects of friedelin isolated from Azima tetracantha Lam. leaves. Food Chem. 2013, 139, 860–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Antonisamy, P.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Kim, J.H. Anti-diarrhoeal activity of friedelin isolated from Azima tetracantha lam. in wistar rats. South Ind. J. Biol. Sci. 2015, 1, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gowdu Viswanathan, M.B.; Ananthi, J.D.J.; Kumar, P.S. Antimicrobial activity of bioactive compounds and leaf extracts in Jatropha tanjorensis. Fitoterapia 2012, 83, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ambarwati, N.S.S.; Elya, B.; Malik, A.; Hanafi, M.; Omar, H. Isolation, characterization, and antibacterial assay of friedelin from Garcinia latissima Miq. leaves. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1402, 055078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Akihisa, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Tamura, T.; Kimura, Y.; Iida, T.; Nambara, T.; Chang, F.C. Triterpenoid Ketones from Lingnania chungii MoClure: Arborinone, friedelin and glutinone. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 789–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ambarwati, N.S.S.; Azminah, A.; Ahmad, I. Molecular Docking, Physicochemical and Drug-likeness Properties of Isolated Compounds from Garcinia latissima Miq. on Elastase Enzyme: In Silico Analysis. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2022, 14, 282–288. [Google Scholar]
  24. Tripathi, I.P.; Dwivedi, N.; Singh, R. Phytochemical Studies on Syzygium cumini: A Tradisional Drugs for Diabetes. Paripex Indian J. Med. Res. 2017, 6, 1989–1992. [Google Scholar]
  25. DeFronzo, R.A.; Ferrannini, E.; Groop, L.; Henry, R.R.; Herman, W.H.; Holst, J.J.; Weiss, R. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  26. Patel, V.S.; Chitra, V.; Prasanna, P.L.; Krishnaraju, V. Hypoglycemic effect of aqueous extract of Parthenium hysterophorus L. in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2008, 40, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Auslander, W.; Haire-Joshu, D.; Houston, C.; Rhee, C.W.; Williams, J.H. A controlled evaluation of staging dietary patterns to reduce the risk of diabetes in African-American women. Diabetes Care 2002, 25, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Anturlikar, S.D.; Gopumadhavan, S.; Chauhan, B.L.; Mitra, S.K. Effect of D-400, a herbal formulation on blood sugar of normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1995, 39, 95. [Google Scholar]
  29. Suthiphasilp, V.; Maneerat, W.; Andersen, R.J.; Phukhatmuen, P.; Pyne, S.G.; Laphookhieo, S. Dasymaschalolactams A–E, aristolactams from a twig extract of Dasymaschalon dasymaschalum. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 3176–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kumar, A.; Ilavarasan, R.; Jayachandran, T.; Deecaraman, M.; Aravindan, P.; Padmanabhan, N.; Krishan, M.R.V. Anti-diabetic activity of Syzygium cumini and its isolated compound against streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Med. Plant Res. 2008, 2, 246–249. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rashid, U.; Ansari, F.L. Challenges in designing therapeutic agents for treating Alzheimer’s disease-From serendipity to rationality. Drug Design and Discovery in Alzheimer’s Disease; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 40–141. [Google Scholar]
  32. Cole, S.L.; Vassar, R. The Alzheimer’s disease β-secretase enzyme, BACE1. Mol. Neurodegener. 2007, 2, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schechter, I.; Ziv, E. Cathepsins S, B and L with aminopeptidases display β-secretase activity associated with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol. Chem. 2011, 392, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. LeFevre, J.W.; McNeill, K.I.; Moore, J.L. Isolatingfriedelin from cork and reducing it to friedelinol and epifriedelinol. A project involving NMR spectrometry and molecular modeling. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bawazeer, S.; Rauf, A.; Bawazeer, S. Potent In Vitro α-glucosidase and β-secretase Inhibition of Amyrin-Type Triterpenoid Isolated from Datura metel Linnaeus (Angel’s Trumpet) Fruits. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 8530165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rauf, A.; Uddin, G.; Khan, A.; Siddiqui, B.S.; Arfan, M.; Dalvandi, K.; Hadda, T.B. Pistagremic acid, a novel β-secretase enzyme (BACE1) inhibitor from Pistacia integerrima Stewart. Nat. Prod. Res. 2015, 29, 1735–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qazi, S.; Das, S.; Khuntia, B.K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, S.; Sharma, G.; Raza, K. In silico molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulation analysis of phytochemicals from Indian foods as potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp and 3CLpro. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2021, 16, 1934578X211031707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wadood, A.; Riaz, M.; Jamal, S.B.; Shah, M.; Lodhi, M.A. Molecular docking study of P4-Benzoxaborolesubstituted ligands as inhibitors of HCV NS3/4A protease. Bioinformation 2013, 9, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hari, S. In silico molecular docking and ADME/T analysis of plant compounds against IL17A and IL18 targets in gouty arthriis. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2019, 9, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of friedelin 1 isolated from Syzygium cumin bark.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of friedelin 1 isolated from Syzygium cumin bark.
Processes 11 00880 g001
Figure 2. Key HMBC correlations of friedelin (1).
Figure 2. Key HMBC correlations of friedelin (1).
Processes 11 00880 g002
Figure 3. Three-dimensional interactions of compound 1 and reference compounds with the target protein: (A,B) α-glucosidase and (C,D) β-secretase.
Figure 3. Three-dimensional interactions of compound 1 and reference compounds with the target protein: (A,B) α-glucosidase and (C,D) β-secretase.
Processes 11 00880 g003
Figure 4. Structure of friedelin 1 isolated from Syzygium cumini bark.
Figure 4. Structure of friedelin 1 isolated from Syzygium cumini bark.
Processes 11 00880 g004
Table 1. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data of friedelin.
Table 1. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data of friedelin.
Carbon No1H-NMR CHEMICAL Shift Values (δ in ppm)/Multiplicity13C-NMR Chemical Shift Values (δ in ppm)
11.95; 1.71/Overlapped18.8
22.37; 2.27/m36.2
3-213.4
42.23/q58.4
5-38.0
61.73; 1.26/Overlapped41.7
71.47; 1.38/m18.1
81.38/dd53.2
9-37.1
101.51/m59.5
111.43; 1.22/m35.5
121.31; 1.38/Overlapped31.9
13-38.3
14-39.6
151.45; 1.24/m32.2
161.53; 1.30/Overlapped35.5
17-30.0
181.54/m42.9
191.35; 1.21/m35.2
20-28.1
211.49/Overlapped 32.2
221.49; 0.93/m41.4
231.01/d7.0
240.73/s14.2
250.87/s14.8
261.01/s18.1
271.05/s18.1
281.18/s32.6
290.95/s32.2
301.05 (s)32.2
Table 2. α-Glucosidase-inhibiting effects of crude extract/fractions and compound 1 extracted from Syzygium cumini bark.
Table 2. α-Glucosidase-inhibiting effects of crude extract/fractions and compound 1 extracted from Syzygium cumini bark.
Samples/Standard Concentrations (µg/mL)% Inhibition IC50 ± SEM (µM)
Hexane 0.226.09NA
Chloroform 0.286.2077.09 ± 1.98
Methanol 0.279.3287.54 ± 1.87
Friedelin0.295.3417.54 ± 1.54
Standard 0.291.3423.07 ± 1.01
SEM stands for “standard error of the mean”.
Table 3. β-Secretase-inhibiting effects of crude extract/fractions and compound 1 extracted from Syzygium cumini bark.
Table 3. β-Secretase-inhibiting effects of crude extract/fractions and compound 1 extracted from Syzygium cumini bark.
Samples/Standard Concentrations (µg/mL)% Inhibition IC50 ± SEM (µM)
Hexane 0.248.12NA
Chloroform 0.283.21318.76 ± 2.09
Methanol 0.266.87364.65 ± 1.73
Friedelin0.291.54290.43 ± 1.65
Standard 0.294.39280.54 ± 1.43
SEM stands for “standard error of the mean”.
Table 4. Docking score and interactions of all the receptors with the isolated compound.
Table 4. Docking score and interactions of all the receptors with the isolated compound.
ProteinCompoundCompound AtomsInteracting ResiduesInteraction TypeDistanceEnergy (Kcal/mol)Docking Score
α-glucosidasefriedelin 1C  33ASP 231H-donor3.75−0.1−6.4683
C  39ASP 233H-donor3.72−0.1
C  49CYS 172H-donor3.80−0.2
α-glucosidaseacarboseO  18ASP 408H-donor2.98−0.8−6.3214
N  19GLU 304H-donor2.93−0.9
C  39HIS 279H-pi3.70−1.1
β-Secretasefriedelin 1C  23PRO 70H-donor3.75−0.2−6.8493
C  25PRO 70H-donor3.72−0.4
C  30TRP 197H-pi3.80 −0.2
β-Secretaseberberine chlorideC  7GLY 34H-donor3.67−0.1−6.621
O  3ILE 118H-acceptor3.64−0.2
6-ringSER 35chloride3.48 −0.3
Table 5. Lipinski Rule of five.
Table 5. Lipinski Rule of five.
Compound IDHydrogen Bond AcceptorHydrogen Bond
Donor
Log p Molecular Weight (Da)
1108.457426.729
Table 6. Pharmacokinetic (ADMET) properties.
Table 6. Pharmacokinetic (ADMET) properties.
CategoryProperty with UnitCompound 1
AbsorptionWater solubility (log mol/L)−6.46
Caco2 permeability (log Papp in 10−6cm/s)1.343
Intestinal absorption (%)100
Skin permeability (log Kp)−2.578
DistributionVDss (human) (log L/kg)0.094
BBB permeability0.757
CNS permeability (log PS)−1.657
MetabolismCYP2D6 substrateNo
CYP3A4 substrateYes
CYP1A2 inhibitorNo
CYP2C19 inhibitorNo
CYP2C9 inhibitorNo
Excretion Total Clearance(log ml/min/kg)−0.04
Renal OCT2 substrateNo
ToxicityAMES toxicityNo
Max. tolerated dose (human) (log mg/kg/day)0.546
Oral Rat Acute Toxicity (LD50) (mol/kg)2.387
HepatotoxicityNo
Skin SensitizationNo
Minnow toxicity (log mM)−3.15
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mujawah, A.; Rauf, A.; Bawazeer, S.; Wadood, A.; Hemeg, H.A.; Bawazeer, S. Isolation, Structural Elucidation, In Vitro Anti-α-Glucosidase, Anti-β-Secretase, and In Silico Studies of Bioactive Compound Isolated from Syzygium cumini L. Processes 2023, 11, 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030880

AMA Style

Mujawah A, Rauf A, Bawazeer S, Wadood A, Hemeg HA, Bawazeer S. Isolation, Structural Elucidation, In Vitro Anti-α-Glucosidase, Anti-β-Secretase, and In Silico Studies of Bioactive Compound Isolated from Syzygium cumini L. Processes. 2023; 11(3):880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030880

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mujawah, Adil, Abdur Rauf, Sami Bawazeer, Abdul Wadood, Hassan A. Hemeg, and Saud Bawazeer. 2023. "Isolation, Structural Elucidation, In Vitro Anti-α-Glucosidase, Anti-β-Secretase, and In Silico Studies of Bioactive Compound Isolated from Syzygium cumini L." Processes 11, no. 3: 880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030880

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop