Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MDPIMDPI
ChildrenChildren
Download PDF
  • Communication
  • Open Access

28 January 2023

Mediterranean Milk Ladder: Integrating a Healthy Eating Plan While Reintroducing Cow’s Milk

,
and
1
Department of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Reckitt, Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute, Glenview, IL 60026, USA
3
Section of Allergy and Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Children2023, 10(2), 234;https://doi.org/10.3390/children10020234
This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Review Reports

Abstract

The process of gradually reintroducing food allergens into an individual’s diet is referred to as a food allergen “ladder”, and the most recent edition of the original Milk Allergy in Primary (MAP) Care Guidelines, as well as the International Milk Allergy in Primary Care (IMAP), includes a shortened, improved, and international version with specific recipes, indicating the exact milk protein content, as well as the duration of heating and the temperature for each step of the ladder. Food allergen ladders are being used increasingly in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a Mediterranean milk ladder based on the principles of the Mediterranean eating pattern. The protein content delivered in a portion of the final food product in each step of the ladder in the Mediterranean version corresponds to that provided in the IMAP ladder. Different recipes for the various steps were provided to increase acceptability and variety. Quantification of the total milk protein, casein content, and beta-lactoglobulin by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) could detect the gradual increase in concentrations, but the accuracy of the method was affected by the presence of the other ingredients in the mixtures. When developing the Mediterranean milk ladder, a key consideration was to reduce the amount of sugar by using limited amounts of brown sugar and substituting sugar with fresh fruit juice or honey for children aged older than one year. The proposed Mediterranean milk ladder includes principles of (a) healthy eating based on the Mediterranean diet and (b) the acceptability of foods across different age groups.

1. Introduction

The EuroPrevall birth cohort study spanning nine European countries indicated that 0.54% of children present a challenge-proven cow’s milk allergy (CMA) [1]. National incidences are reported to range from 1% (in the Netherlands and United Kingdom) to <0.3% (in Lithuania, Germany and Greece) [1]. Children diagnosed with IgE and non-IgE mediated CMA generally have a good prognosis, with successful reintroduction of particularly baked forms of milk in the first five years of life [2,3]. Delaying the reintroduction of cow’s milk can lead to a decrease in the quality of life of both the children and their families, as well as impairment of the children’s physical health [4,5,6].
The timing and method of reintroduction of cow’s milk is based on the type of allergy (IgE or non-IgE), clinical presentation, history of ingestion or accidental ingestion, and laboratory findings, when relevant [7,8,9]. The process of gradual reintroduction of food allergens into an individual’s diet, in order to facilitate the development of natural tolerance, is referred to as a food allergen “ladder” and was historically used in mild to moderate non-IgE mediated food allergies only [8,10], but more recent data support its safe use in IgE mediated food allergies as well [11].
Food allergen ladders are being used increasingly in clinical practice, when it is assumed that the allergy is resolving, but the levels of allergens in many cases are uncharacterized, and probably depend on the degree of heating and/or processing of the milk [12]. Caretakers should consult their physician and/or dietitian for reintroduction guidance, including recipes, steps of reintroduction, and identification and treatment of allergic symptoms, as well as for advice on the importance of carrying rescue medication in the case of IgE mediated food allergies [13,14,15]. In addition to the currently available ladders, there is a need for standardized food ladders that include culturally appropriate, healthy food items for successful and safe introduction of food allergens, depending on the region [16,17].
For reintroduction of milk, specifically, although it is generally considered safe to carry out this process outside of the office or hospital setting, and, in some countries [18,19,20], this demands a careful selection of patients based on their type of allergy, specific IgE levels, and prognosis of resolution [21]. The original Milk Allergy in Primary Care (MAP) Guidelines were transformed into the International Milk Allergy in Primary Care (IMAP) Guidelines in 2017, which is a shortened, improved, and international version of the guidelines, with specific recipes, indicating the exact milk protein content, and the recommended duration and temperature of heating for each step [8].
The aim of the current study was to develop a Mediterranean milk ladder based on the principles of the Mediterranean eating pattern as a healthy version of the IMAP for milk reintroduction in the Mediterranean region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Recipes Development

Based on a bilingual Mediterranean recipe book dedicated to people with food allergy [22], we aimed to develop recipes with local ingredients that are representative of the Mediterranean diet, including whole grain flour, brown rice, olive oil, fresh and dried fruit, legumes, and vegetables.
The initial design and selection of the recipes for the ladder was based on their total milk protein content, as well as the temperature and duration of heating. At least two different recipes were prepared for each step in an attempt to increase the variety and the acceptability and for users. The protein content delivered in a portion of the food products finally selected for each step of the ladder corresponded to that provided in the IMAP ladder.

2.2. Milk Protein Content Analysis

Two samples from each recipe were analyzed for their total milk protein content with the Veratox Total Milk Allergen Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for casein with Veratox Casein Allergens ELISA Kit and for beta-lactoglobulin by SENSISpec ELISA Beta-Lactoglobulin Eurofins, provided by the Food Allergens Laboratory (www.foodallergenslab.com, accessed on 10 September 2022). The aim was to establish both the total milk protein content and the levels of the components that are denatured by heating, i.e., beta-lactoglobulin and the stable components, i.e., casein in our recipes [8,9].

3. Results

The recipes, as shown in Table 1, were created, based on the principal steps outlined above, to reflect culturally appropriate foods, and they contain local ingredients highlighted in the traditional Mediterranean diet. These ingredients include: vegetables, such as carrots, tomatoes and onions; fresh fruit, such as banana and dried fruit, such as raisins; whole grains, such as whole meal flour, oats and brown rice; and non-animal protein sources, such as lentils.
Table 1. Recipes for the Mediterranean milk ladder.
Saturated fats (butter) and trans-fats (margarines) were avoided. Avocado and olive oil, key elements of the Mediterranean diet, rich in monounsaturated fatty acids, flavonoids, and polyphenols, were used in the recipes. Sugar and refined carbohydrates were used sparingly. A seven-step milk ladder was created, including the last step with the pasteurized milk. The recipes included thirteen foods for increased dietary variety during milk re-introduction, with alternatives to increase the acceptability and palatability for the users.
Quantification of the total milk protein, casein content, and beta-lactoglobulin with ELISA was able to detect the gradual increase in the concentrations, but the accuracy of the method was affected by the presence of the other ingredients in the mixtures, such as wheat, grains, and fat (Table 2).
Table 2. Amounts of milk and cooking temperatures in the Mediterranean milk ladder recipes in comparison to the IMAP milk ladder.

4. Discussion

We developed a Mediterranean milk ladder that includes foods based on the principles of the Mediterranean eating pattern [24,25,26]. By developing a milk ladder rooted in the traditions of the Mediterranean eating pattern, not only are we providing a format for the reintroduction of milk at home, but we are doing so in a way that includes local foods that have healthy attributes associated with prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases [24,25,26,27].
A standardized approach was used, including three key components: the food allergen, nutritional factors, and medical aspects [11].
The milk ladder was designed by following the principal step outlined in the IMAP ladder. We considered the dose of milk protein required and the amount of milk needed to reach the appropriate dose for each step, followed by the presence of a wheat matrix for the initial steps, as well as the duration and temperature of heating of the milk in the preparation of the recipe. The recipes also needed to be simple in preparation and contain ingredients that would be culturally accepted and familiar to the users.
The original MAP ladder, when evaluated by users and their carers, which produced criticism of the high amounts of sugars and saturated fat used in the recipes [28]. These were in contrast to healthy eating guidelines, which promote high amounts of fruit, vegetables, and whole grains, as well as monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats rather that saturated fats. When developing the Mediterranean milk ladder, a key consideration was reduction of the amount of sugar, which was achieved by using limited amounts of brown sugar and substituting sugar with fresh fruit juice or honey for children older than one year of age [29]. As the ladder is being used in a younger population, we also wanted to ensure that the taste and texture of the foods included would be palatable to the target population while continuing to meet the key components of Mediterranean eating pattern.
The Mediterranean milk ladder is intended to be used for children with milk allergy under the supervision of a healthcare professional. The concept of milk-reintroduction through the ladder is similar to that used in the original IMAP [8]. Briefly, the healthcare professional decides when it is appropriate for the child for milk re-introduction based on his/her clinical history and symptoms. In collaboration with the parent/carer, the healthcare professional must identify the appropriate step at which the individual child should start, as some children may already include one or more forms of treated milk in their diet, for instance small portions of baked milk in cake or cookies. Before starting the ladder, the child must feel well and be free of abdominal symptoms, bowel symptoms, and eczema.
Although the Mediterranean milk ladder recommended here consists of seven steps, the healthcare professional may adjust the number of steps or the time spent on each step. The estimated portion size in each step is provided as a guide for preschoolers [11], but this may need personalized modification based on the age and development of the individual child. Finally, when a child tolerates a food at any particular step, he/she should continue to consume this food in addition to foods from the previous steps. Conversely, when a food is not tolerated, the child should go back to the previous tolerated step, and the healthcare professional should advise on the time that this step can be tried again.

5. Conclusions

CMA is among the most common of food allergies worldwide. We propose here a Mediterranean milk ladder, which includes principles of (a) healthy eating based on the Mediterranean diet, as well as (b) acceptability of foods across different ages based on regional eating habits. We support the concept that this model of milk introduction provides the dietary variety needed for continuous consumption of milk during each step of the ladder, along with a healthy eating pattern that has immunomodulatory effects, which might play a role in the mitigation of the allergy outcomes [30,31]. Investigation of future application in clinical practice is needed to provide supportive evidence.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.V.; methodology, E.V., C.M. and C.V.; investigation, E.V., C.M. and C.V.; writing—original draft preparation, E.V., C.M. and C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Analysis of milk protein analysis funded by Reckitt, Mead Johnson Nutrition Institute.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schoemaker, A.A.; Sprikkelman, A.B.; Grimshaw, K.E.; Roberts, G.; Grabenhenrich, L.; Rosenfeld, L.; Siegert, S.; Dubakiene, R.; Rudzeviciene, O.; Reche, M.; et al. Incidence and natural history of challenge-proven cow’s milk allergy in European children—EuroPrevall birth cohort. Allergy 2015, 70, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fiocchi, A.; Schünemann, H.J.; Brozek, J.; Restani, P.; Beyer, K.; Troncone, R.; Martelli, A.; Terracciano, L.; Bahna, S.L.; Rancé, F.; et al. Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow’s Milk Allergy (DRACMA): A summary report. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 1119–1128.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vassilopoulou, E.; Konstantinou, G.; Kassimos, D.; Douladiris, N.; Xepapadaki, P.; Manoussakis, E.; Saxoni-Papageorgiou, P.; Papadopoulos, N.G. Reintroduction of Cow’s Milk in Milk-Allergic Children: Safety and Risk Factors. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2008, 146, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Carraro, S.; Frigo, A.; Perin, M.; Stefani, S.; Cardarelli, C.; Bozzetto, S.; Baraldi, E.; Zanconato, S. Impact and Oral Immunotherapy on Quality of Life in Children with Cow Milk Allergy: A Pilot Study. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2012, 25, 793–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yanagida, N.; Minoura, T.; Kitaoka, S. Does Terminating the Avoidance of Cow’s Milk Lead to Growth in Height? Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2015, 168, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giannetti, A.; Vespasiani, G.T.; Ricci, G.; Miniaci, A.; di Palmo, E.; Pession, A. Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy as a Model of Food Allergies. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Walsh, J.; Meyer, R.; Shah, N.; Quekett, J.; Fox, A.T. Differentiating milk allergy (IgE and non-IgE mediated) from lactose intolerance: Understanding the underlying mechanisms and presentations. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2016, 66, e609–e611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Venter, C.; Brown, T.; Meyer, R.; Walsh, J.; Shah, N.; Nowak-Węgrzyn, A.; Chen, T.-X.; Fleischer, D.M.; Heine, R.G.; Levin, M.; et al. Better recognition, diagnosis and management of non-IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy in infancy: IMAP—An international interpretation of the MAP (Milk Allergy in Primary Care) guideline. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2017, 7, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vassilopoulou, E.; Efthymiou, D. Milk Hypersensitivities: Where Is the Grey Line Regarding Their Dietary Management? Eur. Ann. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 48, 164–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. D’Art, Y.M.; Forristal, L.; Byrne, A.M.; Fitzsimons, J.; van Ree, R.; DunnGalvin, A.; Hourihane, J.O. Single low-dose exposure to cow’s milk at diagnosis accelerates cow’s milk allergic infants’ progress on a milk ladder programme. Allergy 2022, 77, 2760–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Venter, C.; Meyer, R.; Ebisawa, M.; Athanasopoulou, P.; Mack, D.P. Food allergen ladders: A need for standardization. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2022, 33, e13714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zepeda-Ortega, B.; Goh, A.; Xepapadaki, P.; Sprikkelman, A.; Nicolaou, N.; Hernandez, R.E.H.; Latiff, A.H.A.; Yat, M.T.; Diab, M.; Al Hussaini, B.; et al. Strategies and Future Opportunities for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cow Milk Allergy. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 608372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Meyer, R.; De Koker, C.; Dziubak, R.; Godwin, H.; Reeve, K.; Chebar-Lozinsky, A.; Foong, R.-X.; Skrapac, A.-K.; Ellmer, M.; Shah, N. The Challenge of Home Allergen Re-introductions Using the Ladder Approach in Children With Non-IgE Mediated Gastrointestinal Food Allergy. Front. Allergy 2021, 2, 721686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muntean, I.A.; Bocsan, I.C.; Wiest, L.K.; Pintea, I.; Dobrican, C.T.; Duca, E.; Ureche, C.; Buzoianu, A.D.; Deleanu, D. Predictive Factors for Oral Immune Modulation in Cow Milk Allergy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bird, J.A.; Barni, S.; Brown-Whitehorn, T.F.; du Toit, G.; Infante, S.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A. Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome oral food challenge: Time for a change? Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021, 126, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chomyn, A.; Chan, E.S.; Yeung, J.; Leek, T.K.V.; Williams, B.A.; Soller, L.; Abrams, E.M.; Mak, R.; Wong, T. Canadian food ladders for dietary advancement in children with IgE-mediated allergy to milk and/or egg. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2021, 17, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. De Vlieger, L.; Smolders, L.; Nuyttens, L.; Verelst, S.; Breynaert, C.; Vanuytsel, T.; Hoffman, I.; Bullens, D.M. A Clinical Perspective on the Dietary Therapies for Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: The Gap Between Research and Daily Practice. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 677859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tosca, M.A.; Olcese, R.; Marinelli, G.; Schiavetti, I.; Ciprandi, G. Oral Immunotherapy for Children with Cow’s Milk Allergy: A Practical Approach. Children 2022, 30, 1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dodi, G.; Di Filippo, P.; Di Pillo, S.; Chiarelli, F.; Attanasi, M. Total serum IgE levels as predictor of the acquisition of tolerance in children with food allergy: Findings from a pilot study. Front. Pediatr. 2022, 10, 1013807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Granot, M.; Machnes Maayan, D.; Weiss, B.; Haberman, Y.; Agmon-Levin, N.; Shouval, D.S. Practice Variations in the Management of Infants With Non-IgE-Mediated Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2022, 75, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chua, G.T.; Chan, E.S.; Yeung, J.; Cameron, S.B.; Soller, L.; Williams, B.A.; Chomyn, A.; Leek, T.K.V.; Abrams, E.M.; Mak, R.; et al. Patient selection for milk and egg ladders using a food ladder safety checklist. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2022, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vassilopoulou Emilia—Meditteranean Delights. metaixmio.gr. Available online: https://www.metaixmio.gr/el/products/%CE%BD%CE%BF%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BC%CE%B9%CE%AD%CF%82-%CE%BC%CE%B5%CF%83%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%AD%CF%82-meditteranean-delights (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  23. Eatright.org. Available online: https://www.eatright.org/food (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  24. Schwingshackl, L.; Morze, J.; Hoffmann, G. Mediterranean diet and health status: Active ingredients and pharmacological mechanisms. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 1241–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Davis, C.; Bryan, J.; Hodgson, J.; Murphy, K. Definition of the Mediterranean Diet; A Literature Review. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9139–9153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vassilopoulou, E.; Guibas, G.V.; Papadopoulos, N.G. Mediterranean-Type Diets as a Protective Factor for Asthma and Atopy. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Widmer, R.J.; Flammer, A.J.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. The Mediterranean Diet, its Components, and Cardiovascular Disease. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. The Milk Allergy in Primary Care (MAP) Guideline 2019. The GP Infant Feeding Network (UK). Available online: https://gpifn.org.uk/imap/ (accessed on 26 December 2022).
  29. Koepke, R.; Sobel, J.; Arnon, S.S. Global Occurrence of Infant Botulism, 1976–2006. Pediatrics 2008, 122, e73–e82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sardecka, I.; Krogulska, A.; Toporowska-Kowalska, E. The influence of dietary immunomodulatory factors on development of food allergy in children. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. 2017, 34, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Spolidoro, G.C.I.; Azzolino, D.; Cesari, M.; Agostoni, C. Diet Diversity Through the Life-Course as an Opportunity Toward Food Allergy Prevention. Front. Allergy 2021, 2, 711945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Evaluation of Beta-Defensin 1 and Mannose-Binding Lectin 2 Polymorphisms in Children with Dental Caries Compared to Caries-Free Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous
Is Metabolic Syndrome Useful for Identifying Youths with Obesity at Risk for NAFLD?
Next