You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Biomedicines
  • This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
  • Review
  • Open Access

8 December 2025

Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis: Perspectives on Immunity, Virulence, and Treatment

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Laboratório de Parasitologia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Doenças Infecciosas e Emergentes, Pontifícia Universidade Católica Do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, PR, Brazil
3
Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas, São Paulo 01246-900, SP, Brazil
4
Laboratório de Protozoologia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil
This article belongs to the Special Issue Leishmaniasis: Pathophysiology, Diagnostics and Current and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches—2nd Edition

Abstract

Leishmaniasis, a neglected tropical disease caused by protozoa of the genus Leishmania, presents a wide clinical spectrum from self-healing cutaneous lesions to life-threatening visceral disease. Its epidemiology and severity vary by geography and species (Old vs. New World), vector biology, and host factors. Pathogenesis reflects a tripartite interplay among parasite, host, and sand fly saliva. Parasite virulence determinants—including lipophosphoglycan, GP63, proteophosphoglycans, and GPI-anchored antigens—facilitate complement evasion, macrophage entry, and suppression of microbicidal pathways. Innate defenses (complement, neutrophils, dendritic cells, NK cells) and PRR signaling (TLRs/NLRs) shape early outcomes, while the balance between Th1-mediated macrophage activation and Th2/regulatory responses dictates clearance versus persistence. Clinically, most infections remain cutaneous; a minority disseminate to mucosa, driven by immunopathology and species traits. Management must be individualized by Leishmania species, lesion burden/site, immune status, geographic region and drug availability. Local therapies (intralesional antimonials, cryo-/thermotherapy) are suitable for limited disease, whereas systemic agents (antimonials, amphotericin B, miltefosine, pentamidine, azoles) are reserved for complex, mucosal, disseminated, or immunosuppressed cases. Drug resistance—via altered uptake/efflux, metabolic rewiring, and genomic plasticity—increased toxicity and treatment failure. Targeting parasite virulence and unique metabolic pathways, improving species-specific diagnostics, and integrating host-directed strategies are priorities to shorten therapy and improve clinical outcomes.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.