Abstract
In this paper, we find a solution of an open problem posed by Alzer, Berg, and Koumandos: determine such that the function is completely monotonic on where denotes the logarithmic derivative of Euler’s gamma function.
1. Introduction
Completely monotonic functions have attracted the attention of many authors. They play an important role in the mathematical analysis, statistics, physics and so on. For example, in the book ([1], p. 275), it can be found that Hanyga [2] showed that complete monotonicity is essential to ensure the monotone decay of the energy in isolated systems (as it appears reasonable from physical considerations); thus, restricting to completely monotonic functions is essential for the physical acceptability and realizability of the dielectric models. Next, in the paper [3], it was shown that, according to consequences of complete monotonicity properties of some functions involving the gamma function, authors established various new upper and lower bounds for the gamma function and the harmonic numbers. Monotonic functions have been studied very intensively by many researchers. A detailed list of references on completely monotonic functions can be found in [1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
We remind some useful definitions and theorems.
It is well known that the function is called as digamma or psi function, where is the classical Euler’s gamma function [6]. The following useful formula
is valid for
Definition 1
([14]). We say that a function f is a completely monotonic on the interval if has derivatives of all orders on I and the inequality holds for and
A characterization of completely monotonic function is given by the Bernstein–Widder theorem [17,18], which reads that a function on is completely monotonic if and only if there exists bounded and non-decreasing function such that the integral
converges for
Definition 2
([14]). Let be a completely monotonic function on and let If the function is a completely monotonic on when and only when then we say is of completely monotonic degree r; if is a completely monotonic on for all then we say that the completely monotonic degree of is
In the paper [9], Guo designed a notation for denoting the completely monotonic degree r of with respect to
Recall that in the paper [4] Alzer and all disproved the following Conjecture 1 of Clark and Ismail [6]:
Conjecture 1
([6]). Let where denotes the logarithmic derivative of Euler’s gamma function. Then, the function is completely monotonic on for each
Clark and Ismail [6] showed that the function is completely monotonic for and they conjectured that it is true for all Alzer and all proved [4] that there is such that if then is not completely monotonic on The proof of Alzer, Berg and Koumandos [4] was based on properties of new function
where
is the Hardy–Littlewood function [7,8,10,11,15] defined for Authors showed that the functions are all completely monotonic on if and only if for In their proof, it was shown that, for each , there is such that It implies Conjecture 1 is not valid. In the paper [13] Matejíčka showed that the result of Alzer is valid for function where is the Nielsen function and he also showed that the functions and are completely monotonic on for each In the paper [12] it was shown that the function is completely monotonic on for . Recall that the Nielsen function can be defined as
for
We believe that the information mentioned and the ideas used in the paper can give some directions for obtaining new results for the Nielsen function.
Definition 3
([16]). A function f has exponential order α if there exist constants and α such that, for some ,
Definition 4
([13]). We say that
is a lower exponential order of function f.
In the paper [13], the following theorem was proved.
Theorem 1
([13]). Let and … be continuous functions of lower exponential orders … respectively, on . Let
; for ; on . Let
and
for . Then, is a completely monotonic function on
Remark 1
([13]). We note that, if the conditions
are fulfilled for and where then are also valid.
In the paper ([4], p. 110), Alzer and all posed the following open problem:
Conjecture 2
([4]). Determine all such that the function is completely monotonic on
Our goal is to find the solution of the Conjecture 2.
2. Results
Lemma 1.
There is only one such that is completely monotonic on for and is not completely monotonic on for
Proof.
In the paper [13], it was presented that is completely monotonic for if and only if for where
Simple calculation gives
Repeating the above procedure times, we obtain
for and Now, we show that, if for and , then for Let and for If for some , then (1) implies so there is such that Put Then, or If , then we have again and Thus, there is such that This is a contradiction with a definition of Thus, and
In the paper ([4], p. 108), the following formula
for where are Bernoulli numbers, was presented.
This implies so However, this is a contradiction with if
We remind readers that Alzer and all [4] showed that there is such that is not completely monotonic on for all so is not valid for all and each Put
Clark and Ismail [6] proved that is completely monotonic on if Thus, It is easy to see that, if , then is not completely monotonic on and, if , then is completely monotonic on according to is completely monotonic on and so for all This implies on for all Thus, is completely monotonic on for , which completes our proof.□
Lemma 2.
Let Let
for t>0. Then,
- (a)
- for
- (b)
- for
Proof.
Case Using for and integration by parts gives
Applying the Formula (2) leads to
This implies that, for each and each , there is such that
for Thus, for , we have
Using mathematical induction leads to
for
If , then
for and
Thus, for
Case Denote again
for and It is obvious that
Considering that we obtain, for each , the inequality
is valid for Thus,
if Alzer and all presented ([4], p. 112) that
for It is easy to show that is a decreasing function on Thus,
for This implies
for Thus, we observe that for Next, it is evident that
for and Putting yields
Theorem 2.
Let such that Let
for Let
Then, the function is completely monotonic on if and only if
Proof.
Using the well known formulas
for and
for reveals
Applying the convolution theorem leads to
Thus,
where
If the function fulfills the conditions of the Theorem 1, then the function is completely monotonic if and only if for The conditions are fulfilled according to Lemmas 1 and 2. The inequality for is equivalent to
Using the Formula (2) gives
This completes the proof. □
3. Materials and Methods
In this paper, we used methods of mathematical analysis.
4. Conclusions
In this paper, we found conditions for and such that the function is completely monotonic on
Funding
This research was funded by VEGA Grant Nos. 1/0589/17, 1/0649/17, and 1/0185/19 and by Kega Grant Nos. 007 TnUAD-4/2017, 002TnUAD-4/2019.
Acknowledgments
The author thanks Ondrušová, dean of FPT TnUAD, Slovakia, for their kind grant support.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Rogosin, S.V.; Dubatovskaya, M.V. Special Functions Methods for Fractional Analysis and Fractional Modeling. In Analysis as a Life; Rogosin, S.V., Çelebi, A.O., Eds.; Trends in Mathematics; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 26–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanyga, A. Physically acceptable viscoelastic models. In Trends in Application of Mathematics to Mechanics; Shaker Verlag GmbH: Aachen, Germany, 2005; pp. 125–136. [Google Scholar]
- Şevli, H.; Batir, N. Complete monotonicity results for some functions involving the gamma and polygamma functions. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 53, 1771–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alzer, H.; Berg, C.; Koumandos, S. On a conjecture of Clark and Ismail. J. Approx. Theory 2005, 134, 102–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernstein, S.N. Sur les fonctions absolument monotones. Acta Math. 1929, 52, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, W.E.; Ismail, M.E.H. Inequalities involving gamma and psi functions. Anal. Appl. 2003, 1, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flett, T.M. On the function . J. Lond. Math. Soc. 1950, 25, 5–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gautschi, W. The Hardy–Littlewood function: An exercise in slowly convergent series. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 2005, 179, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, B.N.; Qi, F. On the degree of the weighted geometric mean as a complete Bernstein function. Afr. Mater. 2015, 26, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, G.H.; Littlewood, J.E. Notes on the theory of series (XX): On Lambert series. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 1936, 41, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuznetsov, A. Asymptotic approximations to the Hardy-Littlewood function. J. Comp. Appl. Math. 2013, 237, 603–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Matejíčka, L. Some notes on complete monotonicity of functions involving derivatives of the Nielsen’s β-function. Probl. Anal. Issues Anal. 2020. submitted. [Google Scholar]
- Matejíčka, L. Short Remarks on Complete Monotonicity of Some Functions. Mathematics 2020, 8, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, F.; Mahmoud, M. Completely monotonic degrees of remainders of asymptotic expansions of the digamma function. arXiv, 2019; arXiv:1912.07989v1. [Google Scholar]
- Segal, S.L. On . J. London Math. Soc. 1972, s2-4, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiff, J.L. The Laplace Transform: Theory and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA; Berlin/Heilderberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Widder, D.V. The Laplace Transform; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1946. [Google Scholar]
- Schilling, R.L.; Song, R.; Vondracek, Z. Bernstein Functions|Theory and Applications, 2nd ed.; de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 37; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).