Abstract
We study the following nonlinear eigenvalue problem: where and is a parameter. Then is a continuous function of , where is the maximum norm of the solution associated with . We establish the precise asymptotic formula for -norm of the solution as up to the second term and propose a numerical approach to obtain the asymptotic expansion formula for .
1. Introduction
We consider the following nonlinear eigenvalue problems
where is a parameter. In this paper, we consider the case , which is motivated by the logarithmic Schroedinger equation (see [1]) and the Klein-Gordon equation with logarithmic potential, which has been introduced in the quantum field theory (see [2]). We know from [3] that, if is continuous in and positive for , then for a given , there exists a unique classical solution pair of (1)–(3) satisfying for any given . Since is constructed explicitly by time-map method (cf. [3], Theorem 2.1), is a continuous for , we write as for .
We introduce one of the most famous results for bifurcation curve, which was shown for the one-dimensional Gelfand problem, namely, the Equations (1)–(3) with . Then it was shown in [4] that it has the exact solution
where . The related results have been obtained in [5]. Unfortunately, however, such explicit solution as (4) cannot be expected in general. From this point of view, one of the standard approach for the better understanding of the asymptotic shape of is to establish precise asymptotic expansion formula for as . Indeed, in some cases, the asymptotic expansion formulas for up to the second term have been obtained. Regrettably, however, precise asymptotic expansion formula for is also difficult to obtain from technical point of view of pure mathematics.
In this paper, in order to understand the asymptotic behavior of , we establish the asymptotic expansion formula for as . The importance of this view point is that, () characterizes (or is related to) the many significant properties, such as the density of the objects in quantum physics, logistic equation in biology, and so on. Moreover, by using this formula, it is possible to obtain the approximate value of numerically as accurate as they want. If the readers observe Theorem 2 and Section 3 below, they understand immediately that it is impossible to purchase more correct approximate value by hand calculation any more.
Now we state our main results.
Theorem 1.
Let . Consider (1)–(3). For an arbitrary fixed small constant , let defined on the compact interval . Then as ,
uniformly on
Theorem 2.
Let . Consider (1)–(3). Then as ,
The leading term in the right-hand side of (6) comes from (5) immediately. The most important point of (6) is to give the procedure to obtain the asymptotic expansion formula for as correct as we want by using computer-assisted method, although we only obtain up to the second term of , since the calculation is purchased by hand.
The proof depends on the time-map argument and the precise asymptotic formula for as .
2. Proof of Theorem 1
We put . It is known that if satisfies (1)–(3), then
We recall the asymptotic behavior of as .
Theorem 3.
([6]). Let and consider (1)–(3). Then as ,
where is a constant explicitly represented by elementary definite integrals, is the remainder term satisfying
where is a constant independent of .
For any arbitrary fixed small , we set . Then it is obvious that there is a constant independent of such that for . Indeed, if there is a subsequence of , which is denoted by again, such that as , then is not convex on for . By (1) and Theorem 3, for any , we have
By this, we see that as
uniformly on . By this, we easily see that and for , which implies (5). Thus the proof is complete. □
3. Proof of Theorem 2
In this section, let . In what follows, we denote by C the various positive constants independent of . We modify the time-map method used in [6]. By (1), we have
By this, (8) and putting , we obtain
This along with (9) implies that for ,
where
By this and putting , we obtain
where
For , we have
By (16)–(20) and Taylor expansion, we obtain
where . We have
Lemma 1.
As
Proof.
We have
It was shown in [6] that as ,
Moreover, it is clear that for
We put . By (25), (26) and integration by parts, we obtain
By l’Hôpital’s rule, we obtain
This implies that . By (25), we have
By (26), we have
By this, we have
We put . Then by integration by parts, (25) and (26), we have
By (24), (31) and (32), we obtain
Thus the proof is complete. □
Proof of Theorem 2.
By Theorem 3, Lemma 1, (21) and direct calculation, we obtain Theorem 2. Thus the proof is complete. □
Remark 1.
Unfortunately, the author is not familiar with computing an analytical formula through computer packages. All the calculations in this paper were obtained by hand. As the authors mentioned in Section 1, if the suitable computer packages will be found, then it will be possible to compute the term
By this, (21) and computer, it will be possible to calculate the approximate value of as correct as we want.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17K05330.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Bialynicki-Birula, I.; Mycielski, J. Nonlinear wave mechanics. Ann. Phys. 1976, 100, 62–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosen, G. Dilatation covariance and exact solutions in local relativistic field theories. Phys. Rev. 1969, 183, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laetsch, T. The number of solutions of a nonlinear two point boundary value problem. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 1970, 20, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelfand, I.M. Some problems in the theory of quasilinear equations. Am. Math. Soc. Transl. 1965, 29, 295–381. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, S.-Y.; Wang, S.-H. Proof of a conjecture for the one-dimensional perturbed Gelfand problem from combustion theory. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 2016, 222, 769–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shibata, T. Precise asymptotics for bifucation curve of nonlinear ordinary differential equation. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).