Abstract
Let be the new general class of functions of the form that are analytic in the open unit disc In the present paper, for we consider classes and and obtain some interesting properties of concerning and , applying subordinations of
MSC:
30C45; 30C80
1. Introduction
Let be the class of functions of the form
that are analytic in the open unit disc Here, we take the principal value for Let denote the subclass of consisting of , which satisfies
for some real Also, is the subclass of consisting of , which satisfies
for some real With the definitions for and we know that if and only if and if and only if If we take for all odd then can be written by
and we write that If satisfies the condition (2), then we say that and if satisfies the condition (3), then we say that It is well known that
is the extremal function for the class and that
is the extremal function for the class For such extremal functions we consider a function given by
The function given by (5) satisfies
and If we consider given by
then satisfies
and
Next, we consider a function given by
for The function given by (6) satisfies
and Also, if we take
for we see that
and
Therefore, the function given by (7) belongs to the class Further, we consider a function
for The function given by (8) satisfies
Thus, we say that if satisfies the inequality (9).
For analytic functions and in we say that is subordinate to written as if there exists a function analytic in with and and such that
With the definition for subordinations, if satisfies
then if satisfies
then and if satisfies
then
The function given by (1) was considered by Owa [1] and Owa et al. [2]. In [1], he considered the coefficient inequalities for the function and in [2], the authors considered the coefficient inequalities for functions in general subclasses. In the present paper, we consider some interesting properties of concerning and applying subordinations of
2. Subordination Properties
We consider some subordination properties for We need the following result by Miller and Mocanu [3]:
Lemma 1.
Let β and γ be complex numbers. Let be convex (univalent) in such that
If is analytic in with and
then
Furthermore, if the Briot–Bouquet differential equation
has a univalent solution then
and is said to be the best dominant of (11).
Theorem 1.
If satisfies for then
Proof.
Let us consider a function and a function
for Letting and in Lemma 1, we have
This shows that
by Then, we have that
that is, □
Theorem 2.
If satisfies
for and then
Proof.
Further, letting and
in Lemma 1, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.
If satisfies
then
To consider our next results, we have to use here the following lemma due to Miller and Mocanu [4].
Lemma 2.
Let be analytic in and be analytic in and the boundary of with If is not subordinate to then there exist points and and a real for which
Now, we derive the following theorem with Lemma 2.
Theorem 4.
Let be the solution of
and let
If is analytic in with and
then
where
Proof.
We follow the same methodology as the proof by Miller and Mocanu (Theorem 5 in [5]). Since (17) gives us that
we see
Consider
and
Then and For such functions, we have to prove that Since using Lemma 11, if is not subordinate to then there exist points and and a real for which
and
Let then and For we consider
Then, using (22) and (23), we see
This implies that
and
Further, applying (17) and (18), we see
Since this contradicts the condition (19). Therefore, the subordination (20) is true when If following the same reasoning as in the proof by Miller and Mocanu (Theorem 5 in [5]), we prove
with (21). □
Letting in Theorem 4, we have the following corollary:
Corollary 1.
If is analytic in with and
then
Considering our next result, we need the following lemma due to Nunokawa, Owa, and Sokol [6]:
Lemma 3.
Let be analytic in with and in If there exists a point such that
and
for some real then
where
and
where
Theorem 5.
Let be analytic in with and in If
then
where
Proof.
Let us suppose that does not satisfy the subordination (31), then there exists a point such that
and
Applying Lemma 3, we have
where k satisfies (27) and (28). If we see that
At this time, for boundary point we know that
Therefore, if the subordination (30) is satisfied,
and
This implies that does not satisfy the subordination (30). If then considering the same way for we also say that does not satisfy the subordination (30). This completes the proof of the theorem. □
Corollary 2.
If satisfies
then
where
Corollary 3.
If satisfies
then
where
Further, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 4.
If satisfies
then
where
Next, we derive the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
Let be analytic in with and in If
for some then
Proof.
We state the following corollaries with the above theorem.
Corollary 5.
If satisfies
for some then
Corollary 6.
If satisfies
for some then
Corollary 7.
If satisfies
for some then
Finally, we derive the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
Let be analytic in with If satisfies
for some real then
Proof.
We suppose that is not subordinate to a function
Applying Lemma 2, we say that there exist points and and a real for which
and
This gives us the following:
Letting we see
Thus, we see
Consider
Then
and Thus, we have
Since (36) contradicts our condition (34). Therefore, satisfies the subordination (35). □
Considering we have the following corollary.
Corollary 8.
If belongs to the class then
Letting we have the following corollary:
Corollary 9.
If satisfies
for some real then
Further, we have the following:
Corollary 10.
If satisfies
for some real then
3. Conclusions
In this paper, we consider given by
that is analytic in the open unit disc and some interesting properties of concerning interesting classes and applying subordinations of Our functions, as given above, represent a novel consideration. So, we believe that our results in this paper will provide a new direction and contribute to developing a new perspective in the studies of geometric function theory.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.Ö.G., D.B., and S.O.; investigation, H.Ö.G., D.B., and S.O.; methodology, H.Ö.G., D.B., and S.O.; writing—original draft, S.O.; writing—review and editing, H.Ö.G. and D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
Data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the reviewers for the constructive feedback.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
- Owa, S. An application of Carathéodory functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2017, 5, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- Owa, S.; Srivastava, H.M.; Hayami, T.; Kuroki, K. A new general idea for starlike and convex functions. Tamkang J. Math. 2016, 47, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Univalent solutions of Briot-Bouquet differential equations. J. Differ. Equ. 1985, 56, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Differential subordinations and univalent functions. Mich. Math. J. 1981, 28, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, S.S.; Mocanu, P.T. Marx-Strohhäcker differential subordination systems. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1987, 99, 527–534. [Google Scholar]
- Nunokawa, M.; Owa, S.; Sokól, J. A criterion for bounded functions. Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 2016, 53, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).