Abstract
For a nonempty set X, let be the total transformation semigroup on X. In this paper, we consider the subsemigroups of which are defined by T(X,Y) where Y is a non-empty subset of X. We characterize the left regular and right regular elements of both and . Moreover, necessary and sufficient conditions for and to be left regular and right regular are given. These results are then applied to determine the numbers of left and right regular elements in for a finite set X.
MSC:
20M20
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let S be a semigroup. An element x of S is called left regular if for some . A right regular element is defined dually. Denote by and the sets of all left regular elements and right regular elements of S, respectively. Left and right regular elements are important in semigroup theory because they play a key role in the study of regular semigroups, which are semigroups in which every element is both left and right regular. Regular semigroups have many interesting properties and are used in various areas of mathematics, including algebra, topology and theoretical computer science. An element x of S is called left (right) magnifying if there is a proper subset M of S satisfying (). In 1963, Ljapin [1] studied the notion of right and left magnifying elements of a semigroup. Several years later, Migliorini introduced the concepts of the minimal subset related to a magnifying element of S in [2,3]. Gutan [4] researched semigroups with strong and nonstrong magnifying elements in 1996. Later, he proved that every semigroup with magnifying elements is factorizable in [5].
Let be the total transformation semigroup on a nonempty set X. It is well known that is a regular semigroup. Moreover, every semigroup is isomorphic to a subsemigroup of some total transformation semigroups. The most basic mathematical structures are transformation semigroups. In 1952, Malcev [6] characterized ideals of . Later, Miller and Doss [7] studied its group -classes and its Green’s relations. The generalization of these studies is the focus of this paper.
In 1975, Symons [8] considered a subsemigroup of defined by
where Y is a nonempty subset of X. He determined all the automorphisms of . In 2005, Nenthein et al. [9] described regular elements in and counted the number of all regular elements of when X is a finite set. They described such a number in terms of and their related Stirling numbers. A few years later, Sanwong and Sommanee [10] studied regularity and Green’s relations for the semigroup . They determined when becomes a regular semigroup. Moreover, they gave a class of maximal inverse subsemigroups of in 2008. After that, they proved that the set is the largest regular subsemigroup of and determined its Green’s relations. In [11], Sanwong described Green’s relations and found all maximal regular subsemigroups of . In 2009, maximal and minimal congruences on were considered. Sanwong et al. [12] found that has only one maximal congruence if X is a finite set. They generalized [13] Theorem 3.4 for Y being infinite. Furthermore, characterizations of all minimal congruences on were given. In the same year, Sun [14] proved that while the semigroup is not left abundant, it is right abundant. Later in 2016, Lei Sun and Junling Sun [15] investigated the natural partial order on . Moreover, they determined the maximal elements and the minimal elements of .
Consider the semigroup
of transformations that leave Y invariant. In 1966, Magill [16] constructed and discussed the semigroup . In fact, if , then . Later in [8], automorphism groups of a semigroup were given by Symons. In 2005, Nenthein et al. [9] characterized regularity for . In addition, they found the number of regular elements in for a finite set X. Honyam and Sanwong [17] studied its ideals, group -classes and Green’s relations on . Furthermore, they described when is isomorphic to for some set A. A few years later, the left, right regular and intra-regular elements of a semigroup were discussed by Choomanee, Honyam and Sanwong [18]. Moreover, when X is finite, they calculated the number of left regular elements in . In [19], natural partial orders on the semigroup were considered by Sun and Wang. Moreover, they investigated left and right compatible elements with respect to this partial oder. Finally, they described the abundance of . In [20], all elements in the semigroup that are left compatible with the natural partial order were studied. Left and right magnifying elements of were given by Chiram and Baupradist in [21]. In a recent study, Punkumkerd and Honyam [22] provided a characterization of left and right magnifying elements on the semigroup . denotes the set of all partial transformations from a subset of X to X and , where is the domain of . Their results have shown to be more general than the previous findings from [21].
In Section 2, we consider left and right magnifying elements of and . We prove that each left magnifying element in is not regular. Furthermore, we show that every left and right magnifying element in is regular. In Section 3 and Section 4, we focus on left and right regularity on and . We show that every left magnifying element in is a right regular element. Every right magnifying element is a left regular element. As [10] determined when becomes a regular semigroup, we also characterize whenever and is a left (right) regular semigroup.
Note that throughout this paper, we will write mappings from the right, rather than and compose that the left to the right, rather than where and . For each , we denote the set by and is the set for a subset . Then, it is obvious that is a partition of X.
2. Magnifying Elements
In this section, we focus on characterizations of left magnifying elements and right magnifying elements in and . The relationships between magnifying elements and regular elements are given.
Theorem 1
([23]). Let . Then, α is right magnifying if and only if α is surjective but not injective and is such that for all and for some .
Theorem 2
([23]). A mapping is left magnifying if and only if α is injective but not surjective.
Theorem 3
([23]). Let . If and , then α is left magnifying if and only if α is injective.
Remark 1.
For each , we note from Theorem 1 that α is right magnifying if and only if and is not injective.
Theorem 4.
Let and . Then, α is left magnifying in a semigroup if and only if α is injective.
Proof.
Assume that is left magnifying. Suppose that M is a proper subset of satisfying . Let be such that . If , then contains exactly one element. Thus, has no proper subset M such that . This is a contradiction. Therefore, . Let . Define by
It is verifiable that . From , there exists such that . Suppose that . Then, , which is a contradiction. Hence, and so is injective.
Suppose that is injective. Then, we choose and let M be the set . From , we have . It follows from our assumption that every , there is a unique satisfying . Let . We define by
It is verifiable that . Now, let . Thus, . From being injective and , we obtain . Therefore, . Hence, and so . This implies that is left magnifying. □
The set of natural numbers is represented by the letter . Additionally, we denote the set of even natural numbers and the set of all odd natural numbers greater than 3 by and , respectively.
Example 1.
Let and . Define by for all . Then, . Clearly, α is injective. From Theorem 4, we obtain that α is left magnifying. We will show that α is not a regular element. Suppose that α is a regular element in . Thus, there exists such that . Consider . Thus, . Hence, , which is a contradiction. So α is not regular element.
From the above example, we will verify that in , each left magnifying element is not a regular element.
Theorem 5.
If , then every left magnifying element of is not regular.
Proof.
Assume that . Let be a left magnifying element. From Theorem 4, we obtain that is injective. Suppose that is a regular element in . Then, there exists such that . Since , we choose . Therefore, and then . Since is injective, we have . This is a contradiction with . So is not regular. □
Theorem 6.
Every right magnifying element of a semigroup is regular.
Proof.
Let be a right magnifying element of . By Remark 1, we obtain that . It follows that . From , we have . This means that and so is a regular element of . □
The following example shows that there exists an element in some which is regular but it is not right magnifying.
Example 2.
Let and . Define by
Note that . It is easy to see that and . Thus, α is regular but it is not right magnifying.
In the rest of this section, we consider magnifying elements in .
Lemma 1
([21]). Let . Then, α is a right magnifying element if and only if α is surjective but not injective such that for all .
Lemma 2
([21]). Let . Then, α is a left magnifying element if and only if α is injective but not surjective such that for all .
Lemma 3
([9]). Let . Then, α is a regular element if and only if .
Theorem 7.
Every left magnifying element of a semigroup is regular.
Proof.
Suppose that is left magnifying. We will show that . Clearly, . Let . Then, there exists such that . Thus, by Lemma 2. This implies that . From Lemma 3, we obtain that is regular. □
Theorem 8.
Every right magnifying element of a semigroup is regular.
Proof.
Suppose that is right magnifying. We will show that . Clearly, . Let . By Lemma 1, we have . Thus, there exists . Hence, . Therefore, . From Lemma 3, we obtain is regular. □
Example 3.
Let α be defined in Example 2. It is clear that and α is neither injective nor surjective. Since , this means that . Hence, α is regular, while it is neither a left nor right magnifying element in .
3. Left Regular and Right Regular Elements in
Now, we start with the characterizations of left regular and right regular elements in . Moreover, we determine whenever becomes a left regular semigroup and a right regular semigroup, respectively.
Theorem 9.
Let . Then, the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
- α is left regular.
- (2)
- .
- (3)
- for any , .
Proof.
Suppose that is left regular. Thus, there exists satisfying . This implies that . Thus, .
Suppose that and let . Thus, there is satisfying . By assumption, we have . Thus, there exists such that ; that is, . It follows that . Therefore, .
Assume that (3) holds. For , there is a unique satisfying . From assumption, we have . So there exists such that . Define by for all . It is obvious that . Let . This implies that . Hence, and so is left regular. □
If we replace Y with X in Theorem 9, we have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
Let . Then, α is left regular if and only if for each .
Proof.
By taking , we obtain and . By Theorem 9(3), we obtain that is regular if and only if for each . □
Theorem 10.
Let . Then, α is right regular if and only if is injective.
Proof.
Assume that is right regular. Then, there exists such that . We will show that is injective. Let be such that . Thus, there exist such that and . We obtain that
Therefore, is injective.
Conversely, suppose is injective. Let . Then, there exists a unique such that . We choose . Define by
From , we obtain that . Let . Note that and where . Since is injective, we have . So . Hence, and so is right regular. □
Corollary 2.
Let . Then, α is right regular if and only if is injective.
From Theorems 4 and 10, we obtain the following corollary immediately.
Corollary 3.
For , every left magnifying element of a semigroup is right regular.
Corollary 4.
Every right magnifying element of a semigroup is left regular.
Proof.
Let be a right magnifying element. By Remark 1, we have . It follows that . Hence, and so is left regular. □
Example 4.
Let and . Define by
Then, . Clearly, α is not injective. We see that . This means that is an injection. This means that α is right regular but it is not left magnifying.
Example 5.
Let and . Define by
Clearly, . We see that and . Hence, α is a left regular element but it is not right magnifying.
Notice that for , we obtain that is left and right regular. Now, we consider the other case.
Theorem 11.
Let be such that . Then, is a right regular semigroup if and only if .
Proof.
If , then and is a right regular semigroup. Assume that is a right regular semigroup and suppose . Let be distinct elements and . Define by
Then, . However, is not injective. Thus, is not right regular, which is a contradiction. Hence, . □
Theorem 12.
Let be such that . Then, is a left regular semigroup if and only if .
Proof.
If , then and is a left regular semigroup. Assume that is a left regular semigroup and . Let be distinct elements and . Define by
Then, . Note that and . So . Therefore, is not left regular. This is a contradiction. Hence, . □
Corollary 5.
Every left regular element of a semigroup is regular.
Proof.
We first note that is the largest regular subsemigroup of . Let be a left regular element of . It follows from Theorem 9(2) that . Thus, and so . Therefore, is a regular element of . □
Example 6.
Let and . Define by
Clearly, . Consider and . Then, α is regular but it is not left regular.
Example 7.
Let and . Define by
It is verifiable that . We obtain that is injective and . Thus, α is right regular but it is not regular.
Finally, we consider the set of all left regular elements and the set of all right regular elements of . We begin with the following example.
Example 8.
Let and . We consider the mappings and . We note that . Moreover, and are injective; that is . Clearly, . This implies that is not injective and so . In this case, we obtain that is not a semigroup.
Theorem 13.
Let . Then, is a semigroup if and only if .
Proof.
Suppose that . Let be distict elements. Define by
We see that and is injective. Define by
Then, and is injective. Since and , we obtain . From , we conclude that is not injective. Therefore, and is not closed.
Assume that . If , then is a right regular semigroup. Therefore, is a semigroup. Suppose that . Let and . We will show that is injective. Let be such that . If or is a constant mapping, then is a constant mapping. Thus, is injective. Suppose that and are not constant mappings. Then, . We observe that . If , then since is injective. Note that . Then, since is injective. This is a contradition. Hence, . So is injective. Therefore, is closed. □
Theorem 14.
Let . Then, is a semigroup if and only if .
Proof.
Suppose that . Let be distinct elements. Define by
And we define by
Then, and . Thus, . It is easy to verify that
such that and . Clearly, . Hence, . So is not left regular.
Conversely, suppose . If , then is a left regular semigroup. We have is a semigroup. Assume that . Let . If or , then is a constant mapping. Suppose that . Then, and so it is a left regular element. From being a left regular element, we obtain and . This implies that and . Similarly, and . It is easy to verify that and . Hence, and . Therefore, is a left regular element. □
Theorem 15.
If Y is finite, then .
Proof.
Assume that Y is finite. Let be a left regular element of . Then, . It follows that ; that is, . From , we obtain is surjective. Since and Y is a finite set, we obtain is an injection. So is right regular.
Assume that is right regular. Thus, is injective and also is surjective since is finite. This means that . We see that . Hence, and so . Therefore, is a left regular element of . □
Next, the cardinality of right regular elements in the semigroup are investigated when X is finite.
Theorem 16.
Let and . Then,
where .
Proof.
By Theorem 15, we have . This implies that . Let and . From Y being finite, we have is bijective for all by Theorem 10. Notice that the number of image sets in Y of cardinality k is equal to . Since there are ways of partitioning the remaining elements into k subsets, we obtain . Therefore,
□
4. Left Regular and Right Regular Elements in
Theorem 17
([18]). Let . Then, α is left regular if and only if and .
Theorem 18
([18]). Let . Then, α is right regular if and only if and where .
Although the left and right regular elements of were characterized in [18], in this section we obtain the different results; see the following theorems.
Theorem 19.
Let . Then, α is a left regular element if and only if for every , and for every , .
Proof.
Assume that is a left regular element. Thus, for some . Let and let . Then, and . We see that and . Therefore, . Let and let . Then, , and . We note that and . Hence, .
Conversely, suppose the conditions hold. Let . Since is a partition of X, there is a unique satisfying . If , then and by our assumption. So, we choose satisfying . If , then since , we choose satisfying . Define by for all . Then, is well-defined and . Let . Then, there is a unique such that . Thus, . Therefore, ; that is, . So is left regular. □
Theorem 20.
Let . Then, α is a right regular element if and only if is injective and .
Proof.
Assume that is right regular. Thus, is also a right regular element in . From Corollary 2, we have is injective. Next, we will show that . Let . Then, for some . Thus, for some since is a right regular element in . If , then , which is a contradiction. Hence, and so .
Assume that is injective and . Let be defined in the converse part of Theorem 10; we note that . It is enough to verify that . Let . If , then by the definition of , we have . Assume that . There is a unique satisfying . If , then . By assumption, we have which is a contradiction. This means that . Hence, and so . □
Example 9.
Let and . Define by
Then, and . So . Moreover, we obtain and . It is clear that for every and for all . From Theorem 19, α is left regular. Note that . By Theorem 3, α is also not regular.
Example 10.
Let α be defined in Example 2. Then, and also . Thus, and α is regular. Note that and . Hence, α is not a left regular element of .
Example 11.
Let α be defined in Example 5. Then, and so . Consider and is not injective. Hence, α is regular but not right regular in .
Example 12.
Recall α from Example 4. Then, and so . We see that is injective and . From Theorem 20, we obtain α is right regular. Consider and . Hence, . From Theorem 3, we obtain α is not regular.
Theorem 21.
The following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
- .
- (2)
- .
- (3)
- .
Proof.
Assume that . We will show that . Suppose that . Let be distinct elements and . Define by
Claim that . If , then . Moreover, if , then . Thus, when or . Note that and . Clearly, . Hence, is not left regular. For the case and , we define by
Then, , and . It follows that but . We conclude that , which is a contradiction. So .
Conversely, assume that . Then, it is easy to verify that is a left regular semigroup. Hence, .
Assume that . We will show that . Suppose that . We consider from condition Then . Since and is not injective, we have is not right regular. Similarly, and is not injective. So is not right regular, which is a contradition. Hence, .
Conversely, suppose that . Then, it is clear that is a right regular semigroup. Hence, . □
Theorem 22.
The following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
- is a semigroup.
- (2)
- is a semigroup.
- (3)
- .
Proof.
. Suppose that . Let be distinct elements and . It is enough to consider only two cases.
Case 1: . Recall from Theorem 14, we have . Note that and . Clearly, and . Thus, is left regular; that is, . Similarly, . Consider and . Therefore, and so is not left regular; that is, . Hence, is not a semigroup.
Case 2: . Assume that . Define by
Then, . So . Note that , and . Clearly, , and . Therefore, is a left regular element of . Define by
If , then . Thus, . If , then . So . We can show that . Then, we note that and . Clearly, . Hence, and so is not a semigroup.
Conversely, suppose . Then, we have is a semigroup from Theorem 21(1).
. Suppose that . Let be distinct elements and . Recall and from the proof of . It is enough to show that and are right regular elements of . Clearly, and are injective. Consider and .
Then, and are right regular elements of ; that is, . Note that is not injective. We conclude that is not right regular. Thus, and so is not a semigroup.
Conversely, suppose . Then, we have is a semigroup from Theorem 21(2). □
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.L.; Methodology, K.S.; Investigation, W.S.; Writing—original draft, K.S. and E.L.; Writing—review & editing, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank the referee for his/her valuable suggestions and comments which helped to improve the readability of this paper. Moreover, we thank The 25th Annual Meeting in Mathematics (AMM 2021) for a good comments about our presentation and inspiring to find the number of left and right regular elements of as well as characterize left and right regular elements of .
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ljapin, E.S. Translations of Mathematical Monographs Vol. 3, Semigroups; American Mathematical Society Providence: Providence, RI, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
- Migliorini, F. Some research on semigroups with magnifying elements. Period. Math. Hung. 1971, 1, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Migliorini, F. Magnifying elements and minimal subsemigroups in semigroups. Period. Math. Hung. 1974, 5, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutan, M. Semigroups with strong and nonstrong magnifying elements. Semigroup Forum 1996, 53, 384–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gutan, M. Semigroups which contain magnifying elements are factorizable. Commun. Algebra 1997, 25, 3953–3963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malcev, A.I. Symmetric groupoids. Mat. Sb. N. S. 1952, 31, 136–151. [Google Scholar]
- Doss, C.G. Certain Equivalence Relations in Transformation Semigroups. Master’s Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA, 1955. [Google Scholar]
- Symons, J.S.V. Some result concerning a transformation semigroup. J. Aust. Math. Soc. 1975, 19, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nenthein, S.; Youngkhong, P.; Kemprasit, Y. Regular elements of some transformation semigroups. Pure Math. Appl. 2005, 16, 307–314. [Google Scholar]
- Sanwong, J.; Sommanee, W. Regularity and Green’s relation on a semigroup of transformations with restricted range. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2008, 2008, 794013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanwong, J. The regular part of a semigroup of transformations with restricted range. Semigroup Forum 2011, 83, 134–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanwong, J.; Singha, B.; Sullivan, R.P. Maximal and Minimal Congruences on Some Semigroups. Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 2009, 25, 455–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanwong, J.; Sullivan, R.P. Maximal congruences on some semigroups. Algebra Colloq. 2007, 14, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L. A note on abundance of certain semigroups of transformations with restricted range. Semigroup Forum 2013, 87, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Sun, J. A natual partial order on certain on certain semigroups of transformations with restricted range. Semigroup Forum 2016, 92, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magill, K.D., Jr. Subsemigroups of S(X). Math. Japon. 1966, 11, 109–115. [Google Scholar]
- Honyam, P.; Sanwong, J. Semigroups of transformations with invariant set. J. Korean Math. Soc. 2011, 48, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choomanee, W.; Honyam, P.; Sanwong, J. Regularity in semigroups of transformations with invariant sets. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2013, 87, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Wang, L. Natural partial order in semigroups of transformations with invariant set. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2013, 87, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Sun, J. A note on naturally ordered semigroups of transformations with invariant set. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 2015, 91, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chinram, R.; Baupradist, S. Magnifying elements in semigroups of transformations with invariant set. Asian-Eur. J. Math. 2019, 12, 1950056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punkumkerd, C.; Honyam, P. Magnifying elements of some semigroups of partial transformations. Quasigroups Relat. Syst. 2021, 29, 123–132. [Google Scholar]
- Chinram, R.; Baupradist, S. Magnifying elements in a semigroup of transformations with restricted range. Mo. J. Math. Sci. 2018, 30, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).