Abstract
In this paper, we apply -calculus to establish some new Chebyshev-type integral inequalities for synchronous functions. In particular, we generalize results of quantum Chebyshev-type integral inequalities by using -integral. By taking and , our results reduce to classical results on Chebyshev-type inequalities for synchronous functions. Furthermore, we consider their relevance with other related known results.
Keywords:
Chebyshev-type inequalities; synchronous (asynchronous) functions; (p,q)-calculus; (p,q)-derivative; (p,q)-integral MSC:
05A30; 34A08; 26D10; 26D15
1. Introduction
Let be integrable functions and be integrable functions. The Chebyshev functional is defined by
see [1] for more details.
We say that functions f and g are synchronous (asynchronous, respectively) on if (, respectively) for each . It follows that , respectively) if f and g are synchronous (asynchronous, respectively) on (see, e.g., [2,3]). The Chebyshev inequality can obtained from (1) by setting .
The Chebyshev functional (1) has attracted the attention of many researchers mainly due to its applications in numerical quadrature, probability, transform theory, and statistical problems. Moreover, the Chebyshev functional (1) has been applied to some integral inequalities by using known fractional integral operators, see [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] and the references therein.
Quantum calculus, also known as q-calculus, was introduced by the mathematician Euler in the eighteenth century, studying calculus without limits, where classical mathematical formulas are obtained as . Newton defined the number in q-infinite series. The definite q-integral, known as the q-Jackson integral, is defined by F. H. Jackson [11,12] in 1910. In quantum calculus, it has many applications in various fields of mathematics and physics, specifically in hypergeometric functions, convexity function, orthogonal polynomials, mechanics, number theory, and relativity theory. In [13], M. Aslam et al. obtained quantum Ostrowski inequalities for the q-differentiable convex function. A. Aral et al. [14] studied applications of q-calculus in operator theory, and H. Gauchman [15] obtained integral inequalities in q-calculus. B. Ahmad et al. [16,17,18,19] studied boundary-value problems for nonlinear q-difference equations with any boundary conditions. In [20], J. D. Bukweli-Kyemba and M. N. Hounkonnou studied quantum deformed algebra: coherent states and special functions. S. Bermudo et al. [21] obtained q-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions and F. Chen W. Yang [22] obtained some new Chebyshev-type quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. Furthermore, the fundamental knowledge and theoretical concepts of quantum calculus are covered in the book written by V. Kac and P. Cheung [23].
In 2013, J. Tariboon and S. K. Ntouyas [24] introduced the quantum calculus on finite intervals. Next, they extended the Hölder, Hermite–Hadamard, trapezoid, Ostrowski, Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz, Grüss, and Grüss-Čebyšev integral inequalities to quantum calculus on finite intervals in [25].
In 2016, M. Tunç and E. Göv [26,27] introduced the -derivative and -integral on finite intervals while proving some properties, and gave several inequalities of integral via -calculus. In recent years, many quantum integral inequalities on a finite interval have been investigated more generally in -calculus, which was first considered by R. Chakrabarti and R. Jagannathan [28]. It is worth noting that q-calculus cannot be directly retrieved by replacing q with in q-calculus, but q-calculus may be recaptured by setting in -calculus. In [29], J. Prabseang et al. obtained -Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for double integral and -differentiable convex functions. H. Kalsoom et al. [30] obtained -estimates of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi-convex functions. In [31], M. N. Hounkonnou studied -calculus: differentiation and integration and P. N. Sadjung [32] studied -Taylor formula. Y. M. Chu et al. [33] obtained new post-quantum analogues of Ostrowski-type inequalities using new definitions of left–right -derivatives and definite integrals. In [34], H. Kalsoom et al. obtained post-quantum Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities associated with coordinated higher-order generalized strongly pre-index and quasi-pre-index mappings. M. Kunt et al. [35] obtained -estimates of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for midpoint type integral inequalities via convex and quasi convex function. In addition, more results of -calculus appear in [36,37,38,39] and the references cited therein.
Motivated by the results mentioned above, by using the four parameters of deformation and , we propose generalizing and extending some new Chebyshev inequalities in q-integral to -integral. Furthermore, we obtain their relevance with other related known results. We hope that the ideas and techniques presented in this paper will inspire interested readers working in this field.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we present basic concepts of -calculus, which will be used in our work. Throughout this paper, we let be constants, and we set and .
Definition 1
([26,27]). The -derivative of a continuous function at x, denoted by , is defined by
If exists for all , then f is -differentiable on J.
By setting in Definition 1, we obtain , where is defined by
In case , which is the q-derivative of the function f.
Example 1.
For and , we have
Definition 2
([26,27]). If is a continuous function and , then the -integral of the function f for x, denoted by , is defined by
Moreover, if , then the -integral is defined by
If exists for all , then f is -integrable on J.
Definition 2 reduces to the classical q-integral of the function f when and .
Example 2.
Define a function by , where . Then
Theorem 1
([26,27]). If is a continuous function and , then
- (i)
- (ii)
Theorem 2
([26,27]). If are continuous functions, , and , then
- (i)
- (ii)
- (iii)
Lemma 1.
If are continuous functions with for all , then, for , we have
Proof.
Let . Then . Because are continuous functions with for all , we get
The next lemma is due to N. Arunrat et al. [39].
Lemma 2
([39]). If is a twice -differentiable function with -integrable on J, then
3. Main Results
In this section, we establish some new Chebyshev-type integral inequalities via -calculus. From now on, we assume that all of -integral exists, and let
and
Lemma 3.
Let f and g be continuous and synchronous functions on J and let be continuous functions. Then
Proof.
Since f and g are continuous and synchronous functions on , we get for each that Equivalently,
Multiplying both sides of (5) by and then -integrating the resulting relation with respect to from a to , we obtain
Theorem 3.
Let f and g be continuous and synchronous functions on J and let be continuous functions. Then,
Proof.
Multiplying both sides of (8) by , we obtain
By substituting and in (4), we have
Multiplying both sides of (10) by , we obtain
Putting and in (4) and multiplying both sides by , we get
Remark 1.
- (i)
- Lemma 3 and Theorem 3 are reversed in the following cases.
- (a)
- The functions f and g are asynchronous on J.
- (b)
- The functions , and ψ are non-positive on J.
- (c)
- Two of the functions , and ψ are non-negative and the third one is non-positive on J.
- (ii)
- If we takein Theorem 3, then it reduces to Theorem 3.2 in [22].
Lemma 4.
Let f and g be continuous and synchronous functions on and let be continuous functions. Then,
Proof.
Since f and g are continuous and synchronous functions on , we get for all that Equivalently,
Multiplying both sides of (14) by and then -integrating the resulting inequality with respect to from c to , we obtain
Theorem 4.
Let f and g be continuous and synchronous functions on and let be continuous functions. Then,
Proof.
Putting and in (13), we get
Multiplying both sides of (17) by , we obtain
By substituting and in (13), we have
Multiplying both sides of (19) by , we obtain
Putting and in (13) and then multiplying both sides by , we get
Remark 2.
- (i)
- Theorem 4 is reversed in the following cases.
- (a)
- The functions f and g are asynchronous on .
- (b)
- The functions , and ψ are non-positive on .
- (c)
- Two of the functions , and ψ are non-negative, and the third one is non-positive on .
- (ii)
- Theorem 3.4 in [22] is a special case of Theorem 4, when .
Theorem 5.
Let be continuous and synchronous functions on and let be a continuous function. Then,
Proof.
Let be continuous and synchronous functions on . Then for each , . Equivalently,
Multiplying both sides of (23) by and -integrating the resulting inequality with respect to from c to , we obtain
Theorem 6.
Let be continuous and synchronous functions on and let be continuous functions. Then,
Proof.
Let be continuous and synchronous functions on . Then for each , . This implies that
Multiplying both sides of (26) by and -integrating the resulting inequality with respect to from c to , we obtain
Remark 3.
- (i)
- It may be noted that inequalities in Theorem 5 and 6 are reversed when functions , and h are asynchronous.
- (ii)
- Theorem 5 can obtained from Theorem 6 by letting .
- (iii)
- If we takeandin Theorem 5 and 6, then they reduce to ([22], Theorems 3.6 and 3.7), respectively.
In the next theorem, we give some inequalities of Fejér-type inequalities by applying -calculus to the weighted Chebyshev-type inequality.
Theorem 7.
Let be a twice -differentiable with -integrable on J. Assume that is non-constant and . Then
where
and
Proof.
Observe that if g and h are continuous asynchronous functions on J and is a non-negative continuous function, then Lemma 3 yields
That is,
By Lemma 2, it implies that
Since is non-constant and , we obtain
Consider
and
Observe that and are continuous asynchronous functions on J.
Substituting in (28) by and , respectively, we obtain
Then, a direct calculation shows us that
Consider
and
Replacing in (28) by and , respectively, we obtain
Then, a direct calculation shows us that
Consider
and
Corollary 1.
Let be a twice q-differentiable with integrable on J. Assume that is non-constant with . Then
where
and
4. Conclusions
We established some inequalities of Chebyshev-type inequalities by using -integral, such as Chebyshev inequalities and the Fejér-like inequalities. Our work improves the results of Chebyshev-type quantum integral inequalities. By taking and , our results give classical inequalities. The -integral inequalities deduced in the present research are very general and helpful in error estimations involved in various approximation processes. With these contributions, we hope these techniques and ideas established in this article will inspire the readers to explore the field of -integral inequalities.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.A. and S.K.N.; investigation, N.A., K.M.N. and K.N.; methodology, K.N.; validation, N.A., K.M.N., K.N., P.A. and S.K.N.; visualization, K.M.N., K.N., P.A. and S.K.N.; writing—original draft, N.A. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received funding support from the National Science, Research, and Innovation Fund (NSRF), Thailand.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments and helpful advice on our manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chebyshev, P.L. Sur les expressions approximati ves des integrales definies par les autres prises entre lesmemes limites. Proc. Math. Soc. Kharkov. 1882, 2, 93–98. [Google Scholar]
- Kuang, J.C. Applied Inequalities; Shandong Sciences and Technologie Press: Shandong, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Purohit, S.; Raina, R. Chebyshev-type inequalities for the Saigo fractional integrals and their q-analogues. J. Math. Inequal 2013, 7, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahmani, Z. New inequalities in fractional integrals. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2010, 9, 493–497. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, W. Some new fractional quantum integral inequalities. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012, 25, 963–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Agarwal, P. Some new Saigo type fractional integral inequalities and their q-analogues. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baleanu, D.; Agarwal, P. Certain inequalities involving the fractional q-integral operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 2014, 10. [Google Scholar]
- Brahim, K.; Taf, S. Some fractional integral inequalities in quantum calculus. J. Fract. Calc. Appl. 2013, 4, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
- Chinchane, V.; Pachpatte, D. On some integral inequalities using Hadamard fractional integral. Malaya J. Mat. 2012, 1, 62–66. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. On a q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 1910, 41, 193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, F.H. q-difference equations. Am. J. Math. 1910, 32, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, M.; Awan, M.U.; Noor, K.I. Quantum Ostrowski inequalities for q-differentiable convex function. J. Math. Inequal 2016, 10, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar]
- Aral, A.; Gupta, V.; Agarwal, R.P. Applications of q-Calculus in Operator Theory; Springer Science + Business Media: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Gauchman, H. Integral inequalities in q-calculus. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2002, 47, 281–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B. Boundary-value problems for nonlinear third-order q-difference equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2011, 94, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, B.; Alsaedi, A.; Ntouyas, S.K. A study of second-order q-difference equations with boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Ahmad, B.; Ntouyas, S.K.; Purnaras, I.K. Existence results for nonlinear q-difference equations with nonlocal boundary conditions. Comm. Appl. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 19, 59–72. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, B.; Nieto, J.J. On nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear q-difference equation. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 2012, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukweli-Kyemba, J.D.; Hounkonnou, M.N. Quantum deformed algebra: Coherent states and special functions. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1301.0116v1. [Google Scholar]
- Bermudo, S.; Kórus, P.; Valdés, J.E.N. On q-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for general convex functions. Acta Math. Hung. 2020, 162, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, F.; Yang, W. Some new Chebyshev-type quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2016, 21, 417–426. [Google Scholar]
- Kac, V.; Cheung, P. Quantum Calculus; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum calculus on finite intervals and applications to impulsive difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 2013, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. Quantum integral inequalities on finite intervals. J. Inequal Appl. 2014, 2014, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M.; Göv, E. Some integral inequalities via (p,q)-calculus on finite intervals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunç, M.; Göv, E. (p,q)-integral inequalities. RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 2016, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Chakrabarti, R.; Jagannathan, R. A (p,q)-oscillator realization of two-parameter quantum algebras. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1991, 24, L711–L718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabseang, J.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J. (p,q)-Hermite–Hadamard inequalities for double integral and (p,q)-differentiable convex functions. Axioms 2019, 8, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalsoom, H.; Amer, M.; Junjua, M.D.; Hassain, S.; Shahxadi, G. (p,q)-estimates of Hermite–Hadamard-type inequalities for coordinated convex and quasi convex function. Mathematics 2019, 7, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hounkonnou, M.N.; Désiré, J.; Kyemba, B.R. (p,q)-calculus: Differentiation and integration. SUT J. Math. 2013, 49, 145–167. [Google Scholar]
- Sadjang, P.N. On the fundamental theorem of (p,q)-calculus and some (p,q)-Taylor formulas. Results Math. 2018, 73, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.M.; Awan, M.U.; Talib, S.; Noor, M.A.; Noor, K.I. New post-quantum analogues of Ostrowski-type inequalities using new definitions of left-right (p,q)-derivatives and definite integrals. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 2020, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalsoom, H.; Rashid, S.; Tdrees, M.; Safdar, F.; Akram, S.; Baleanu, D.; Chu, Y.M. Post quantum inequalities of Hermite–Hadamard-type associated with co-ordinated higher-order generalized strongly pre-index and quasi-pre-index mappings. Symmetry 2020, 12, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunt, M.; Iscan, I.; Alp, N.; Sarikaya, M.Z. (p,q)-Hermite–Hadamard and (p,q)-estimates for midpoint type inequalities via convex and quasi-convex functions. RACSAM 2018, 112, 969–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.A.; Budak, H.; Kalsoom, H.; Chu, Y.M. Post-quantum Hermite–Hadamard inequalities involving newly defined (p,q)-integral. Authorea 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thongjob, S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Ntouyas, S.K. Some (p,q)-Hardy type inequalities for (p,q)-integrable functions. AIMS Math. 2020, 6, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wannalookkhee, F.S.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. On Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for coordinated convex functions via (p,q)-calculus. Mathematics 2021, 9, 698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arunrat, N.; Nakprasit, K.M.; Nonlaopon, K.; Tariboon, J.; Ntouyas, S.K. On Fejér type inequalities via (p,q)-calculus. Symmetry 2021, 13, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).