Abstract
Three classes of improper integrals involving higher powers of , arctan, and arcsin are examined using the recursive approach. Numerous explicit formulae are established, which evaluate these integrals in terms of , , the Riemann zeta function, and the Dirichlet beta function.
Keywords:
integration by parts; trigonometric functions; Fourier series; Riemann zeta function; Dirichlet beta function MSC:
11M35; 33B10; 33B30
1. Introduction and Outline
The evaluation of integrals is an important subject in mathematics, physics and applied sciences. In the mathematical literature (see, for example, the monographs by Boros and Moll [1], and Vǎlean [2]), there are numerous intriguing integrals. We reproduce, for instance, the following elegant integrals involving inverse trigonometric and hyperbolic functions, where G denotes the Catalan’s constant:
Some related integrals of log-trigonometric functions are highlighted as follows:
Euler (1772) discovered the identity (h) and the following remarkable value
by making use of the Fourier series
Koyama and Kurokawa [13] evaluated the integral below as well as the related indefinite integrals:
Further integral identities of a similar nature can be found in the papers [14,15,16,17,18].
| [3] | |
| [3] | |
| [4,5,6,7] | |
| ([8], (A.289)) and [3,5,6] | |
| ([9], §4.521: Equation (1)) | |
| ([1], Equation 6.6.25) |
| [5,7,10,11] | |
| ([4,12] |
Motivated by these elegant formulae, we shall primarily investigate the following improper integrals with two integer parameters in this article:
where and , subject to , so that all these integrals are convergent. By making use of recurrence relations and Fourier series expansions, we shall explicitly evaluate, in the next three sections, these three classes of integrals. Two classes of subsidiary integrals and regarding log-cosine and log-tangent functions will also be examined. Finally, the paper will conclude with a brief discussion of more integral evaluations in Section 5.
Throughout the paper, we shall utilize the following notations. Let and stand, respectively, for the sets of integers and natural numbers with . For and an indeterminate x, the rising and falling factorials are defined by and
Given and , the symbol “” represents that “i is congruent to j modulo m”. The logical function will also be employed with and . In addition, we need the following four functions:
2. Evaluation of
When , the following algebraic equality holds:
Then, we have the integral equation below
Considering that
we can alternatively express the integral , by integration by parts, as
Combining the two expressions of results in the following three-term recurrence relation
According to this relation, to compute all the values for and with , we have to determine the boundary values .
2.1.
For , we have the following obvious values:
2.2.
When it is easy to see that . For , by changing the variable , we have
According to the power series expansion
we can express
By repeatedly applying integration by parts, we can evaluate the last integral
Hereafter, exchanges in the order of summation and integration are justified by Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem ([19], §11.32). By substitution, we can obtain the closed formula
2.3.
We can also evaluate by carrying out the same procedure as for . In fact, for , by making the change in variable , we can express
We take the above integral as an example to show how to justify the term-by-term integration by making use of Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem. For any fixed x with , we have the following power series expansion
Now, define the following sequence of functions
When , we have
where the rightmost function is dominating and integrable over . According to Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem, we can proceed using term-by-term integration
where we have employed integral formula (3). Observing that the last series is uniformly convergent for , we can evaluate the series through the term-by-term limit, as follows:
This gives rise to the below formula
In conclusion, we have shown the following general theorem. Its special case was studied by Sofo and Nimbran [3].
Theorem 1
( and with ).
Keeping in mind that and can be written in terms of the zeta function (except for ), we assert, according to this theorem, that is always expressible as a linear combination of and zeta values. The integral values for with and are recorded in Table 1.
Table 1.
Values for .
3. Evaluation of
Supposing , by making use of integration by parts, we can obtain
When , the above integral can further be manipulated as
Substituting this into (6), and then simplifying the resulting expression, we can derive the following three-term recurrence relation
Based on this relation, to calculate all the for and with , it is sufficient to determine the boundary values .
3.1.
Firstly, it is trivial to check for that
3.2.
Then for , we have no difficulty evaluating
When , applying integration by parts twice shows that
Then under the change in variable , the last expression becomes
where stands for the parametric integral
3.3.
To evaluate the integral , we recall the following Fourier series (cf. [9], §1.441)
Then, using Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem ([19], §11.32), we can express
Applying integration by parts for m times, we can evaluate the last integral as follows:
Taking into account the trigonometric identity
we can reformulate the infinite series
Observing that
we have
By substitution, we obtain
Keeping in mind of (12), we have established the following explicit formula.
Proposition 1
().
From this proposition, we claim that can always be expressed in terms of and values of -function and -function (particularly ). The initial values for small m are recorded below, where we can locate in Moll ([20], §8.4), and both and in Vǎlean ([2], Equations 3.87 and 3.113).
3.4.
Applying integration by parts, we have
Then, making the change of variable , we can express
Henceforth, is defined by the parametric integral
3.5.
Recalling another known Fourier series (cf. ([9], §1.442))
we can reformulate the integral as
Denote the last integral by . Applying integration by parts for m times, we can evaluate this as follows:
By making use of the trigonometric identity (11), we can proceed
Keeping in mind of (12), we can reduce the two trigonometric sums
Therefore, we have proved the following simplified expression
which is equivalent to the formula below.
Proposition 2
().
It should be pointed out that a similar formula for was found by Elaissaoui and Guennoun [21] by integrating the product of and the Euler polynomials.
In accordance with this proposition, we affirm that can always be expressed by -function and -function values. The first few values for small m are displayed as follows, where the value for can be found in ([2], Page 130).
Summing up, we have proved the following general theorem.
Theorem 2
( and with ). Let and be as in Propositions 1 and 2, respectively. The integral values for are determined as follows:
Some particular results of this theorem are commented as follows:
- Both and can be found in Boyadzhiev ([8], Equations (A.289) and (5.54)).
- Kobayashi [6] evaluated , and further
- Sofo and Nimbran [3] examined cases for and .
- When and , the recurrence relation in Theorem 2 reads asRepeating this relation yields the next equationwhich is equivalent to a known recursion due to Chen [22].
In view of this theorem, can always be expressed in terms of and values of -function and -function. The values for with and are given in Table 2.
Table 2.
Values for .
4. Evaluation of
When , we have by integration by parts
which can alternatively be expressed as
By splitting into two integrals, we have
When , the last integral can be manipulated, again using integration by parts, as
which leads us to the following expression
Substituting (17) into the above equation, we can simplify the resulting equation into the following three-term recurrence relation
By making use of this recurrence relation, we can produce all the values of for and subject to as long as the boundary values are explicitly determined.
4.1.
For , it is routine to compute
4.2.
For , applying integration by parts yields
The last integral can further be manipulated as follows:
Comparing the above relation with (20), we obtain the recurrence relation belew
By iterating this relation ℓ-times, we obtain the expression
Letting and , respectively, for even n and odd n, we can make further simplifications
where we have employed the initial values (see Entry (e) in Section 1)
Writing further
we can evaluate the partial sum by telescoping
From this, we derive the following closed formula, which is equivalent to those recorded in ([9], §4.523: Equations (1) and (2)):
4.3.
For , making the change in variable and then applying integration by parts, we can proceed with
which can be restated as the following recurrence relation
Considering that
we can iterate the above recurrence ℓ-times
For , the above expression becomes
4.4.
For , making the change in variable and then applying integration by parts, we can reformulate the integral
Recalling Propositions 1 and 2, we find the following explicit formula
4.5.
For , making the change in variable and then applying integration by parts twice, we can manipulate the integral
This leads us to the following formula
where is already evaluated by Proposition 2.
To summarise, we have shown the following general theorem.
Theorem 3
( and with ). Let and be as in Propositions 1 and 2, respectively. The integral values for are determined as follows:
According to this theorem, can always be expressed byin terms of and , as well as values of -function and -function. The initial values for with and are recorded in Table 3.
Table 3.
Values for .
5. Concluding Comments
By making the change of variable , it is trivial to check
Therefore the two integrals on the right hand sides can easily be evaluated.
In this section, we shall further examine some integral variants that can be evaluated as consequences by the preceding Theorems and Propositions, as shown in this paper.
5.1. Evaluation of the Integral
Firstly, for , we examine
A similar integral of “” over was treated by Espinosa and Moll [24]. This can easily be expressed as
Hence, we can compute by employing Propositions 1 and 2. The initial values for are exemplified as follows (where can also be found in ([25], Equation 9.7.9)).
5.2. Evaluation of the Integral
For , consider the integral
Making the change of variable and then applying integration by parts, we obtain the transformation formula
In view of Theorem 1, the initial values for are exemplified as follows.
5.3. Evaluation of the Integral
For and subject , consider the integral
By making the change of variable , we can derive the following transformation formula
Therefore, can be computed by means of Theorem 1 with the initial values being given by the same Table 1.
Moll ([20], §6.5 and §6.6) evaluated two similar integrals
More hyperbolic integral identities can be found in ([9], §3.527).
5.4. Evaluation of the Integral
Assuming and with , we examine the next integral
When , Moll ([25], §11.5) recorded an explicit formula for . Jameson and Lord [4] evaluated
According to Theorem 2, all the can be computed as consequences. For and , the corresponding values are given in Table 4.
Table 4.
Values for .
5.5. Evaluation of the Integral
Let and satisfying the condition . Define the integral by
A similar integral was extensively examined by Moll ([25], §5.2).
Applying Theorem 3, we can evaluate as consequences. For and , the corresponding values are recorded in Table 5.
Table 5.
Values for .
Author Contributions
Original draft & supervision, W.C.; Writing & editing, C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Boros, G.; Moll, V.H. Irresistible Integrals; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Vǎlean, C.I. (Almost) Impossible Integrals, Sums, and Series; Springer Nature AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Sofo, A.; Nimbran, A.S. Euler sums and integral connections. Mathematics 2019, 7, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jameson, G.; Lord, N. Integrals evaluated in terms of Catalan’s constant. Math. Gaz. 2017, 101, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johansson, F. Contributors. Catalan’s Constant. Fungrim Home Page. Available online: https://fungrim.org/topic/Catalan’s_constant/ (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Kobayashi, M. Integral representations for local dilogarithm and trilogarithm functions. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2108.12543v1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marichev, O.; Sondow, J.; Weisstein, E. Catalan’s Constant. From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. Available online: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CatalansConstant.html (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Boyadzhiev, K.N. Special Techniques for Solving Integrals: Examples and Problems; World Scientific: Hackensack, NJ, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Adamchik, V. Thirty–Three Representations of Catalan’s Constant. Available online: https://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Demos/109/ (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Bradley, D.M. Representations of Catalan’s Constant. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/2325473 (accessed on 2 February 2001).
- Lord, N. Variations on a theme – Euler and the logsine integral. Math. Gaz. 2012, 96, 451–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koyama, S.Y.; Kurokawa, N. Euler’s integrals and multiple sine functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2004, 133, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowman, F. Note on the integral . J. London Math. Soc. 1947, S1-22, 172–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, J.; Srivastava, H.M. Explicit evaluations of some families of log-sine and log-cosine integrals. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2011, 22, 767–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coffey, M.W. On some log-cosine integrals related to ζ(2), ζ(3), ζ(4), and ζ(6). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2003, 159, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas, P. Integrals of polylogarithmic functions, recurrence relations, and associated Euler sums. Math. Comp. 2005, 74, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glasser, M.L. Some integrals of the arctangent function. Math. Comp. 1968, 22, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudin, W. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed.; McGraw–Hill, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Moll, V.H. Special Integrals of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, the Proofs–Volume II; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Elaissaoui, L.; Guennoun, Z.A. Evaluation of log-tangent integrals by series involving ζ(2n+1). Integral Transforms. Spec. Funct. 2017, 28, 460–475. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H. Transcendental moments of the arctangent: Solution to Problem 2020. Math. Mag. 2018, 91, 157. [Google Scholar]
- Rainville, E.D. Special Functions; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Espinosa, O.; Moll, V.H. On some integrals involving the Hurwitz zeta function: Part 1. Ramanujan J. 2002, 6, 159–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moll, V.H. Special Integrals of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik, the Proofs—Volume I; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).