Abstract
Let b and c be two elements in a semigroup S. The -inverse is an important outer inverse because it unifies many common generalized inverses. This paper is devoted to presenting some symmetric properties of -inverses and -inverses. We first find that S contains a -invertible element if and only if it contains a -invertible element. Then, for four given elements in S, we prove that a is -invertible and d is -invertible if and only if is invertible along c and is invertible along b. Inspired by this result, the -invertibility is characterized by one-sided invertible elements. Furthermore, we show that a is inner -invertible and d is inner -invertible if and only if c is inner -invertible and b is inner -invertible.
MSC:
16U90; 15A09
1. Introduction
An element a in a semigroup S is said to be regular if there exists such that , in which case x is called an inner inverse (or a -inverse) of a. Recall that an involution ∗ of S is a self-map such that and for all . If there exists x satisfying , , and , then it is the unique solution of the previous four equations and is called the Moore–Penrose inverse [1] of a (denoted by ).
An element a in a semigroup S is Drazin invertible [2] if there exists such that
If such x exists, then it is unique and called the Drazin inverse of a (denoted by ). The smallest integer m that makes the above equations hold is called the Drazin index of a and denoted by . If , x is called the group inverse of a and denoted by .
Let S be any semigroup and . Mary [3] defined that the inverse of a along b as the unique element y satisfying the following relations:
In this case, a is said to be invertible along b, and y is denoted by . If, moreover, , then is called the inner inverse of a along b. He also proved that the Moore–Penrose inverse of an element a is equal to , and the group inverse of a is equal to . The set of all elements which are invertible along b is denoted by .
Let S be any semigroup and . Drazin [4] defined the -inverse of a to be the unique element y satisfying
In this case, a is said to be -invertible, and y is denoted by . When , we can see that . To see the difference between inverses along an element and -inverses, we consider the semigroup . Let and . Then .
Later, Drazin [5] also defined the one-sided version of the -inverse in a semigroup S. If , or equivalently if there exists y such that and , then a is said to be left -invertible. Such y is called a left -inverse of a. Dually, a is said to be right -invertible if , or equivalently if there exists z such that and . Such z is called a right -inverse of a. Drazin proved that a is -invertible if and only if a is left and right -invertible. Given any semigroup S and , we denote the sets of all left -invertible elements, right -invertible elements and -invertible elements in S by , and , respectively.
The motivation of this paper comes from the following facts.
Lemma 1
(Theorem 7 in [3]). Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is invertible along b if and only if is group invertible with if and only if is group invertible with , in which case,
Lemma 2
(Corollary 2.7 in [6]). Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is inner invertible along b if and only if a is invertible along b and b is invertible along a.
These are two interesting results with nice symmetry. However, in general cases, the -invertibility of a does not imply that , , and are group invertible (see Example 2.1 in [7]), and a being -invertible with does not imply that and (see the case of and ).
Wu and Chen [7] had done some interesting work on the case of . They characterize by using group invertible elements and invertible elements, respectively. We find that implies , so it seems more natural to consider the situation and , which of course includes the case of . This paper focuses on the case of and .
In Section 2, we prove that
which allows us to transform many questions on the -invertibility and -invertibility into those on the invertibility along b and c. As an application of this observation, the (one-sided) -invertibility is characterized by one-sided invertible elements.
If such that , then is called the inner -inverse of a. In Section 3, we consider some symmetric properties of inner -inverses. We prove that a is inner -invertible and d is inner -invertible if and only if c is inner -invertible and b is inner -invertible. Especially, a is both inner -invertible and inner -invertible if and only if both b and c are inner invertible along a if and only if a is inner invertible along b and c, in which case
At last, under the assumption that , we characterize the product by equations and prove that is equal to the -inverse of a, which generalizes some results on the DMP inverse.
2. Characterizations of and
We first recall two basic characterizations of -invertibility, which will be frequently used in the sequel discussion.
Lemma 3
(Theorem 2.2 in [4]). Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is -invertible if and only if and . In this case, , where and .
Lemma 4
(Proposition 6.1 in [4]). Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is -invertible if and only if there exists satisfying that
where stands for the monoid generated by S.
From previous two Lemmas, we can immediately obtain a connection between and .
Proposition 1.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then if and only if .
Proof.
If , then and by Lemma 3. From Proposition 3.3 in [8], we know that is regular. Thus is the -inverse of by Lemma 4, for any inner inverse of .
By symmetry, the converse statement is also true. □
Proposition 2.
Let S be any semigroup and . If , then the mapping is a bijection from to , for any inner inverse of x.
Proof.
At first, we prove that is well defined. Suppose that for some . For any inner inverse of x, we know that is the -inverse of by Lemma 4. Then
Next we prove that is a bijection. Define another mapping from to . Similarly, is well-defined. Then we obtain
where the last second equality holds because of Theorem 2.7 in [9]. Similarly, . Thus, is a bijection. □
Let be elements in a semigroup S such that a is -invertible. We wonder what conditions are needed to ensure that d is -invertible. To handle this question, we consider the following Lemma.
Lemma 5.
Let S be any semigroup and . If and , then
- (1)
- d is left -invertible if and only if d is left -invertible;
- (2)
- d is right -invertible if and only if d is right -invertible;
- (3)
- (Remark 2.2(i) in [10]) d is -invertible if and only if d is -invertible, in which case, .
Proof. (1) Suppose that , , and for some .
If d is left -invertible, then there exists such that . It follows that
Conversely, suppose that for some . We have that
(2) It can be proved similarly.
(3) It can be proved by combining (1) and (2). □
Proposition 3.
Let S be any semigroup and . If a is -invertible, then we have the following:
- (1)
- d is left -invertible if and only if d is left invertible along ;
- (2)
- d is right -invertible if and only if d is right invertible along ;
- (3)
- d is -invertible if and only if d is invertible along , in which case, .
Proof.
If , then and by Lemma 3. Taking and exchanging the position of b and c in Lemma 5, then the proposition follows. □
Now we give the main result of this section, which presents a necessary and sufficient condition for any semigroup S and such that and .
Theorem 1.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then and if and only if and . In this case,
Proof.
If and , then we know that
by Lemma 3. It follows that
which means that . Similarly, .
Conversely, if and , then we have
So by Lemma 3. Similarly, . The formulae of and follow from Lemma 3. □
From above proof, we can see that the one-sided version of Theorem 1 is also true. We list it below and omit its proof.
Proposition 4.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then
- (1)
- and if and only if and ;
- (2)
- and if and only if and .
Let S be any semigroup and . Lemma 1 shows that if and only if and if and only if and , in which case . By Theorem 1, we can also characterize the -inverse and -inverse by the group inverses.
Proposition 5.
Let S be any semigroup and . If and , then and are group invertible. In this case,
Proof.
If and , then and by Theorem 1. According to Lemma1, and are group invertible with
Substituting them into the formulae for and in Theorem 1, the formulae in terms of the group inverses follow. □
Proposition 6.
Let S be any semigroup and . If u is any one of , , , , then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- and ;
- (2)
- u is group invertible, and ;
- (3)
- u is group invertible, and ;
- (4)
- u is Drazin invertible, and ;
- (5)
- u is Drazin invertible, and .
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). By Proposition 5.
(2) ⇒ (4). It is obvious.
(4) ⇒ (1). If u is Drazin invertible, then and are Drazin invertible by Cline’s formula [11]. Meanwhile, from and , we know that
It follows that , which means that is group invertible. Similarly, is group invertible.
Noting that and , we have
(1) ⇒ (3) ⇒ (5) ⇒ (1) can be proved dually. □
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and such that b is regular with an inner inverse . Theorem 3.2 in [12] proved that a is invertible along b if and only if is invertible if and only if is invertible. Denoting the set of all invertible (resp., left and right invertible) elements in R by (resp., and ), we characterize the (one-sided) -inverse and (one-sided) -inverse by using (one-sided) invertible elements as follows.
Proposition 7.
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and such that b and c are regular. If is an inner inverse of b and is an inner inverse of c, denote
Then
- (1)
- and if and only if and if and only if and , in which case is a left -inverse of d and is a left -inverse of a, where and are left inverses of u and v, respectively;
- (2)
- and if and only if and if and only if and , in which case is a right -inverse of a and is a right -inverse of d, where and are right inverses of s and t, respectively;
- (3)
- and if and only if and if and only if and , in which case,
Proof. (1) By Proposition 4, and if and only if and . Additionally, and if and only if and by Theorem 3.2 in [13], which is equivalent to and by Jacobson’s lemma.
If , multiplying by c on the right of yields that . It follows that , which means that is a left -inverse of d. Similarly, one can prove that is a left -inverse of a.
(2) Similarly by using Theorem 3.4 in [13].
(3) Combining (1) and (2), it follows. □
If , we showed in the proof of Proposition 1 that for any inner inverse of . Suppose that b, c and are regular. then if and only if and by replacing d by in Proposition 7. However, characterizing the left -invertibility of a only requires that b, are regular and v is left invertible.
Proposition 8.
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and such that b and are regular. If is an inner inverse of b and is an inner inverse of , then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is left -invertible;
- (2)
- ;
- (3)
- .
In this case, is a left -inverse of a, where is a left inverse of t.
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). If a is left -invertible, then . It follows that . Then we have
So is left invertible.
(2) ⇒ (3). By Jacobson’s lemma.
(3) ⇒ (1). Multiplying by b on the right of yields that . It follows that
Then is a left -inverse of a. □
Dually, we have a characterization for right -invertibility as follows.
Proposition 9.
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and such that c and are regular. If is an inner inverse of c and is an inner inverse of , then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is right -invertible;
- (2)
- ;
- (3)
- .
In this case, is a right -inverse of a, where is a right inverse of s.
Combining Propositions 8 and 9, we have the following characterization for -invertibility.
Theorem 2.
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and such that b, c and are regular. If are inner inverses of , respectively, then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is -invertible;
- (2)
- and ;
- (3)
- and .
In this case,
where is a left inverse of t and is a right inverse of s.
3. Symmetric Properties of Inner -Invertible Elements
Let S be any semigroup and . If such that , then is called the inner -inverse of a. For arbitrary , it is easy to verify that is the inner -inverse of . Theorem 2.13 in [14] proved that a is inner -invertible if and only if , and .
Let R be any associative ring with 1 and . Theorem 3.16 in [15] proved that a is inner -invertible if and only if a is regular, and . We give a characterization for inner -invertible elements as follows.
Proposition 10.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is inner -invertible;
- (2)
- a is -invertible and ;
- (3)
- a is -invertible and .
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). Suppose that for some . Then
(2) ⇒ (1). Assume that for some . Then
(1) ⇔ (3) can be proved similarly. □
Let S be any semigroup and . Lemma 2 shows that and if and only if a is inner invertible along b. It follows immediately that a is inner invertible along b if and only if b is inner invertible along a. We consider to generalize this fact to the case of and .
Proposition 11.
Let S be any semigroup and . If and , then c is inner -invertible and b is inner -invertible, where and .
Proof.
Let and . We first prove that c is -invertible. In fact, supposing that for some ,
Similarly, .
Meanwhile, we have
By symmetry, we have that b is inner -invertible. □
Lemma 6.
Let S be any semigroup and . If , , and , then
Proof.
If , , and , then we have
Similarly, , and . □
Now we have the main result of this section.
Theorem 3.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is inner -invertible and d is inner -invertible;
- (2)
- c is inner -invertible and b is inner -invertible;
- (3)
- , and ;
- (4)
- , and .
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). If a is inner -invertible and d is inner -invertible, then c is inner -invertible and b is inner -invertible by Proposition 11.
(2) ⇒ (1). It is similar to the proof of (1) ⇒ (2).
(1) ⇒ (3). If a is inner -invertible and d is inner -invertible, then and . It follows that b is -invertible by Proposition 11.
(3) ⇒ (1). If , and , then and by Lemma 6.
The equivalence of (1) and (4) can be proved similarly. □
Corollary 1.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is inner invertible along b if and only if b is inner invertible along a.
If and , then and by Lemma 1. It follows that
By symmetry, . We generalized this result to the case of -inverses.
Proposition 12.
Let S be any semigroup and . If , , and , then with
Proof.
If , , and , then with and by Proposition 5, then we have
where the last equality follows by Cline’s formula [11]. The remaining three equalities can be verified similarly. □
Proposition 13.
Let S be any semigroup and . Then the following conditions are equivalent:
- (1)
- a is both inner -invertible and inner -invertible;
- (2)
- both b and c are inner invertible along a;
- (3)
- a is inner invertible along b and c.
In this case,
and
Proof. (1) ⇔ (2). Taking in Theorem 3, then the equivalence between (1) and (2) follows.
(2) ⇔ (3). By Corollary 13.
In this case, noting that and by Lemma 6, we have
Similarly, we can obtain the formula of . □
Let S be any semigroup and . Theorem 4.4 in [16] proved that a is core invertible if and only if a is -invertible, and a is dual core invertible if and only if a is -invertible. Taking and in Proposition 13, we have the following result.
Corollary 2
(Theorem 5.6 in [17]). Let S be any semigroup and . Then a is both core invertible and dual core invertible if and only if a is both groups are invertible and Moore–Penrose invertible. In this case, is the core inverse of a and is the dual core inverse of a.
The reason why the -inverse of a is equal to in Theorem 13 is based on the following fact.
Proposition 14.
Let S be any semigroup and . If , then with
Proof.
It is clear that . We have
and
So with . □
If a is invertible along b and c, then the -invertibility can be characterized by .
Proposition 15.
Let S be any semigroup and . If a is invertible along b and c, then
- (1)
- if and only if ;
- (2)
- if and only if ;
- (3)
- if and only if and .
Proof. (1) Noting that and , we have if and only if by Lemma 5. Additionally, if and only if by definition.
(2) Can be proved similarly.
(3) Combining (1) and (2). □
Let . Malik and Thome [18] defined the matrix to be the DMP inverse of A and to be the dual DMP inverse of A. Later, Mehdipour and Salemi [19] defined the matrix to be the CMP inverse of A. We know that and , where , it is natural to consider the properties of , and , under the assumption that .
Proposition 16.
Let S be any semigroup and . If a is invertible along b and c such that , then
- (1)
- is the unique solution of the following equations
- (2)
- is the unique solution of the following equations
- (3)
- is the unique solution of the following equations
Proof. (1) We first check that satisfies these three equations. Actually, we have
If y also satisfies these equations, supposing that for some , then
(2) and (3) can be proved similarly. □
Let with . Taking and in Proposition 16, we recover the characterizations of the DMP inverse ([18], Theorem 2.2), dual DMP inverse and CMP inverse ([19], Theorem 2.1).
Particularly, , and can be expressed as the -inverses of a.
Proposition 17.
Let S be any semigroup and . If a is invertible along b and c such that , then
- (1)
- is the -inverse of a;
- (2)
- is the -inverse of a;
- (3)
- is the -inverse of a.
Proof. (1) It is obvious that . Meanwhile, we have
So is the -inverse of a.
(2) and (3) can be proved in a similar way. □
Let with . Taking and in Proposition 17, we have , which are Theorem 3.2 in [20] and Theorem 3.6 in [21].
Corollary 3.
Let with . Then is the -inverse of A.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.S. and J.C.; methodology, G.S. and J.C.; validation G.S. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S.; writing—review and editing, G.S. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12171083, 11871145, 12071070), the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX20_0074).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the editor and reviewers sincerely for their constructive comments and suggestions that have improved the quality of the paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Penrose, R. A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 1955, 51, 406–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drazin, M.P. Pseudo-inverses in associative rings and semigroups. Amer. Math. Mon. 1958, 65, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mary, X. On generalized inverses and Green’s relations. Linear Algebra Appl. 2011, 434, 1836–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drazin, M.P. A class of outer generalized inverses. Linear Algebra Appl. 2012, 436, 1909–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drazin, M.P. Left and right generalized inverses. Linear Algebra Appl. 2016, 510, 64–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mary, X. Classes of semigroups modulo Green’s relation . Semigroup Forum 2014, 88, 647–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Wu, C.; Chen, J.L. On (b,c)-inverses and (c,b)-inverses. Comm. Algebra 2021, 49, 4313–4323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Castro-González, N.; Chen, J.L. Characterizations of outer generalized inverses. Canad. Math. Bull. 2017, 60, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Mosíc, D. The one-sided inverse along two elements in rings. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2021, 69, 2410–2422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boasso, E.; Kantún-Montiel, G. The (b,c)-inverses in rings and in the Banach context. Mediterr. J. Math. 2017, 14, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cline, R.E. An application of representation for the generalized inverse of a matrix. In Proceedings of the Technology Summary Report; Mathematics Research Center, U.S. Army, University of Wisconsin: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; p. 592. [Google Scholar]
- Mary, X.; Patrício, P. Generalized inverses modulo in semigroups and rings. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2012, 61, 1130–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.H.; Chen, J.L.; Patrício, P. Further results on the inverse along an element in semigroups and rings. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2016, 64, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosić, D.; Zou, H.L.; Chen, J.L. On the (b,c)-inverse in rings. Filomat 2018, 32, 1221–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.Z.; Benítez, J. Existence criteria and expressions of the (b,c)-inverse in rings and its applications. Mediterr. J. Math. 2018, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakić, D.S.; Diničić, N.Č.; Djordjević, D.S. Group, Moore-penrose, core and dual core inverse in rings with involution. Linear Algebra Appl. 2014, 463, 115–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.L.; Zhu, H.H.; Patrício, P.; Zhang, Y.L. Characterizations and representation of core and dual core inverses. Canad. Math. Bull. 2017, 60, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, S.B.; Thome, N. On a new generalized inverse for matrices of an arbitrary index. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 226, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehdipour, M.; Salemi, A. On a new generalized inverse of matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2018, 66, 1046–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreyra, D.E.; Levis, E.E.; Thome, N. Chrarcterizations of k-commutative equations for some outer generalized inverses. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2020, 68, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, K.Z.; Cvetković-Ilić, D.S.; Cheng, Y.J. Different chareaterizations of DMP inverses of matrices. Linear Multilinear Algebra 2022, 70, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).