Numerical Modeling of the Global Effects of Ozone Formation During the Oxidation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. INM-CM6.0 Climate Model
2.2. MIM1 Isoprene Oxidation Mechanism
2.3. Biogenic and Anthropogenic Emissions
2.4. Experimental Design
2.5. Data Verification
3. Results
3.1. Intermodal Comparison
3.2. Isoprene’s Influence on Tropospheric Chemical Composition
3.3. Vertical Distribution of Isoprene and Its Oxidation Products
3.3.1. Isoprene
3.3.2. Role of Nitrogen Reservoir Species (PAN, MPAN, ISON, NALD)
4. Discussion
4.1. Mechanisms of Isoprene’s Impact on Tropospheric Ozone
4.2. Role of Nitrogen Reservoir Species in Spatial Transport
4.3. Comparison with Observations and Other Models
4.4. Study Limitations and Prospects
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Complete List of Chemical Species in INM-CM6.0
| Family | Species |
|---|---|
| Base chemistry (Pre-MIM1 Implementation) | |
| Oxygen Nitrogen Hydrogen Carbon Chlorine Bromine Halocarbons | O, O(1D), O3 N, NO, NO2, NO3, N2O, N2O5, HNO3, HO2NO2 H, OH, HO2, H2O, H2O2 CO, CO2, CH4, CH3O2, CH3OOH, H2CO Cl, Cl2, ClO, OClO, ClONO, Cl2O2, HCl, HOCl, ClONO2 Br, BrCl, BrO, HBr, HOBr, BrONO2 CCl4, CFCl3, CF2Cl2, CH3Cl, CH3CCl3, CHClF2, C2Cl3F3, C2Cl2F4, C2ClF5, CF2ClBr, CF3Br, CH3Br, C2H3FCl2 |
| MIM1 (This Study) | |
| Substrate Peroxy radicals Carbonyl products Hydroperoxides NOx reservoirs Acetyl species Other | C5H8 (isoprene) ISO2, MACRO2 MACR, HACET, MGLY ISO2H, MACRO2H PAN, MPAN, ISON, NALD CH3CO3, CH3CO3H, CH3COOH HCOOH (formic acid) |
Appendix B. Complete Chemical Mechanism with Rate Constants
| No. | Reagents | Products | A (cm3/(mol·c)) | E/R (K) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O + O3 | O2 + O2 | 8.00 × 10−12 | 2060 | ||
| 2 | O(1D) + N2 | O + N2 | 2.15 × 10−11 | −110 | ||
| 3 | O(1D) + O2 | O + O2 | 3.30 × 10−11 | −55 | ||
| 4 | O(1D) + O3 | O2 + O2 | 1.20 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 5 | H2O + O(1D) | OH + OH | 1.63 × 10−10 | −60 | ||
| 6 | H2 + O(1D) | OH + H | 1.20 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 7 | CH4 + O(1D) | CH3 + OH | 1.31 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 8 | CH4 + O(1D) | H2 + H2CO | 0.09 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 9 | CH4 + O(1D) | H + CH3O | 0.35 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 10 | H + O3 | OH + O2 | 1.40 × 10−10 | 470 | ||
| 11 | H2 + OH | H2O + H | 2.80 × 10−12 | 1800 | ||
| 12 | OH + O3 | HO2 + O2 | 1.70 × 10−12 | 940 | ||
| 13 | OH + O | H + O2 | 1.80 × 10−11 | −180 | ||
| 14 | OH + OH | H2O + O | 1.80 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 15 | HO2 + O | OH + O2 | 3.00 × 10−11 | −200 | ||
| 16 | HO2 + O3 | OH + O2 | 1.00 × 10−14 | 490 | ||
| 17 | H + HO2 | OH + OH | 7.20 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 18 | H + HO2 | H2 + O2 | 6.90 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 19 | H + HO2 | H2O + O | 1.60 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 20 | OH + HO2 | H2O + O2 | 4.80 × 10−11 | −250 | ||
| 21 | HO2 + HO2 | H2O2 + O2 | 3.00 × 10−13 | −460 | ||
| 22 | HO2 + HO2 | H2O2 + O2 | 2.10 × 10−33 | −920 | ||
| 23 | OH + H2O2 | H2O + HO2 | 1.80 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 24 | O + H2O2 | OH + HO2 | 1.40 × 10−12 | 2000 | ||
| 25 | NO + O3 | NO2 + O2 | 3.00 × 10−12 | 1500 | ||
| 26 | NO + HO2 | OH + NO2 | 3.30 × 10−12 | −270 | ||
| 27 | NO2 + O | NO + O2 | 5.10 × 10−12 | −210 | ||
| 28 | NO2 + O3 | NO3 + O2 | 1.20 × 10−13 | 2450 | ||
| 29 | NO3 + O | O2 + NO2 | 1.00 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 30 | NO + NO3 | NO2 + NO2 | 1.50 × 10−11 | −170 | ||
| 31 | HNO3 + OH | NO3 + H2O | 2.40 × 10−14 | −460 | ||
| 32 | OH + HO2NO2 | H2O + NO2 | 1.30 × 10−12 | −380 | ||
| 33 | N + O2 | NO + O | 1.50 × 10−11 | 3600 | ||
| 34 | N + NO | N2 + O | 2.10 × 10−11 | −100 | ||
| 35 | N + NO2 | N2O + O | 5.80 × 10−12 | −220 | ||
| 36 | N2O + O(1D) | NO + NO | 7.25 × 10−11 | −20 | ||
| 37 | N2O + O(1D) | N2 + O2 | 4.63 × 10−11 | −20 | ||
| 38 | CL + O3 | CLO + O2 | 2.30 × 10−11 | 200 | ||
| 39 | CL + H2 | HCL + H | 3.05 × 10−11 | 2270 | ||
| 40 | CL + HO2 | HCL + O2 | 1.40 × 10−11 | −270 | ||
| 41 | CL + HO2 | OH + CLO | 3.60 × 10−11 | 375 | ||
| 42 | CL + H2O2 | HCL + HO2 | 1.10 × 10−11 | 980 | ||
| 43 | CLO + O | CL + O2 | 2.80 × 10−11 | −85 | ||
| 44 | CLO + OH | CL + HO2 | 7.40 × 10−12 | −270 | ||
| 45 | CLO + OH | HCL + O2 | 6.00 × 10−13 | −230 | ||
| 46 | CLO + HO2 | HOCL + O2 | 2.60 × 10−12 | −290 | ||
| 47 | CLO + NO | CL + NO2 | 6.40 × 10−12 | −290 | ||
| 48 | CLO + CLO | CL + OCLO | 3.50 × 10−13 | 1370 | ||
| 49 | CLO + CLO | CL + CLOO | 3.00 × 10−11 | 2450 | ||
| 50 | CLO + CLO | CL2 + O2 | 1.00 × 10−12 | 1590 | ||
| 51 | HCL + OH | CL + H2O | 1.80 × 10−12 | 250 | ||
| 52 | HOCL + OH | H2O + CLO | 3.00 × 10−12 | 500 | ||
| 53 | O + CLONO2 | CLO + NO3 | 3.60 × 10−12 | 840 | ||
| 54 | OH + CLONO2 | HOCL + NO3 | 1.20 × 10−12 | 330 | ||
| 55 | CLONO2 + CL | CL2 + NO3 | 6.50 × 10−12 | −135 | ||
| 56 | CCL4 + O(1D) | CL + CL | 3.30 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 57 | C2H3FCL2 + O(1D) | CL + CL | 2.60 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 58 | O(1D) + CHCLF2 | CL + products | 1.00 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 59 | O(1D) + CF2CL2 | CLO + CL | 1.40 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 60 | O(1D) + CFCL3 | CLO + CL | 2.30 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 61 | O(1D) + C2CL3F3 | CL + CL | 2.00 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 62 | O(1D) + C2CL2F4 | CL + CL | 1.30 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 63 | O(1D) + C2CLF5 | CL + products | 5.00 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 64 | OH + CH3CCL3 | CL + CL | 1.64 × 10−12 | 1520 | ||
| 65 | CHCLF2 + OH | CL + H2O | 1.05 × 10−12 | 1600 | ||
| 66 | OH + CH3CL | H2O + CL | 2.40 × 10−12 | 1250 | ||
| 67 | CO + OH | CO2 + H | 1.50 × 10−13 | 0 | ||
| 68 | CH4 + OH | CH3 + H2O | 2.45 × 10−12 | 1775 | ||
| 69 | H2CO + OH | H2O + HCO | 5.50 × 10−12 | −125 | ||
| 70 | H2CO + O | HCO + OH | 3.40 × 10−11 | 1600 | ||
| 71 | CL + CH4 | HCL + CH3 | 7.30 × 10−12 | 1280 | ||
| 72 | CL + H2CO | HCL + HCO | 8.10 × 10−11 | 30 | ||
| 73 | HCO + O2 | CO + HO2 | 5.20 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 74 | CH3O + O2 | H2CO + HO2 | 3.90 × 10−14 | 900 | ||
| 75 | CH3O2 + NO | CH3O + NO2 | 2.80 × 10−12 | −300 | ||
| 76 | CH3O2 + HO2 | CH3OOH + O2 | 4.10 × 10−13 | −750 | ||
| MIM1 reactions | ||||||
| 77 | C5H8 + OH | ISO2 + products | 2.54 × 10−11 | 410 | ||
| 78 | C5H8 + OH | ISO2 + products | 2.54 × 10−11 | 410 | ||
| 79 | C5H8 + O3 | MACR + H2CO | 7.86 × 10−15 | 1913 | ||
| 80 | C5H8 + NO3 | ISON + products | 3.03 × 10−12 | 446 | ||
| 81 | ISO2 + NO | NO2 + MACR | 2.43 × 10−12 | −360 | ||
| 82 | ISO2 + NO | ISON + products | 1.12 × 10−13 | −360 | ||
| 83 | ISO2 + HO2 | ISO2H + products | 2.05 × 10−13 | −1300 | ||
| 84 | ISO2 + ISO2 | MACR + MACR | 2.00 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 85 | ISO2H + OH | MACR + OH | 1.00 × 10−10 | 0 | ||
| 86 | ISON + OH | NALD + products | 1.30 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 87 | MACR + OH | MACRO2 + products | 3.00 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 88 | MACR + O3 | MGLY + HCOOH | 7.51 × 10−16 | −1521 | ||
| 89 | MACRO2 + NO | NO2 + HACET | 2.54 × 10−12 | −360 | ||
| 90 | MACRO2 + HO2 | MACRO2H + products | 1.82 × 10−13 | −1300 | ||
| 91 | MACRO2 + MACRO2 | HACET + MGLY | 2.00 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 92 | MPAN + OH | NO2 + products | 3.60 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 93 | MACRO2H + OH | MACRO2 + products | 3.00 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 94 | HACET + OH | MGLY + HO2 | 3.00 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 95 | MGLY + OH | CH3CO3 + CO | 1.50 × 10−11 | 0 | ||
| 96 | MGLY + NO3 | CH3CO3 + CO | 1.44 × 10−12 | 1862 | ||
| 97 | NALD + OH | H2CO + CO | 5.60 × 10−12 | −270 | ||
| 98 | CH3CO3 + HO2 | CH3CO3H + products | 4.30 × 10−13 | −1040 | ||
| 99 | CH3CO3 + HO2 | CH3COOH + O3 | 4.30 × 10−13 | −1040 | ||
| 100 | CH3CO3 + NO | CH3O2 + NO2 | 8.10 × 10−12 | −270 | ||
| 101 | CH3CO3 + CH3O2 | H2CO + HO2 | 2.00 × 10−12 | −500 | ||
| 102 | CH3CO3 + CH3O2 | CH3COOH + H2CO | 2.00 × 10−12 | −500 | ||
| 103 | CH3CO3 + CH3CO3 | CH3O2 + CH3O2 | 2.90 × 10−12 | −500 | ||
| 104 | CH3CO3 + NO3 | CH3O2 + NO2 | 4.00 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 105 | PAN + OH | H2CO + NO2 | 4.00 × 10−14 | 0 | ||
| 106 | CH3CO3H + OH | CH3CO3 + products | 3.70 × 10−12 | 0 | ||
| 107 | CH3COOH + OH | CH3O2 + products | 4.00 × 10−13 | −200 | ||
| Three body reactions | ||||||
| K0 | N | K∞ | M | |||
| 108 | O + O2 + M | O3 + M | 6.00 × 10−34 | 2.40 | 0.00 × 100 | 0 |
| 109 | H + O2 + M | HO2 + M | 4.40 × 10−32 | 1.30 | 7.50 × 10−11 | −0.2 |
| 110 | OH + OH + M | H2O2 + M | 6.90 × 10−31 | 1.0 | 2.60 × 10−11 | 0.0 |
| 111 | OH + NO2 + M | HNO3 + M | 1.89 × 10−30 | 3.0 | 7.00 × 10−11 | 0.3 |
| 112 | HO2 + NO2 + M | HO2NO2 + M | 2.00 × 10−31 | 3.4 | 2.90 × 10−12 | 1.1 |
| 113 | NO2 + NO3 + M | N2O5 + M | 2.00 × 10−30 | 4.4 | 1.40 × 10−12 | 0.7 |
| 114 | NO2 + O + M | NO3 + M | 2.50 × 10−31 | 1.8 | 2.20 × 10−11 | 0.7 |
| 115 | NO + O + M | NO2 + M | 9.00 × 10−32 | 1.5 | 3.00 × 10−11 | 0 |
| 116 | O(1D) + N2 + M | N2O + M | 2.80 × 10−36 | 0.9 | 0.00 × 100 | 0 |
| 117 | CLO + NO2 + M | CLONO2 + M | 1.80 × 10−31 | 3.4 | 1.50 × 10−11 | 1.9 |
| 118 | CLO + CLO + M | CL2O2 + M | 1.60 × 10−32 | 4.5 | 3.00 × 10−12 | 2.0 |
| 119 | CL + O2 + M | CLOO + M | 2.20 × 10−33 | 3.1 | 1.80 × 10−10 | 0 |
| 120 | CH3 + O2 + M | CH3O2 + M | 4.00 × 10−31 | 3.6 | 1.20 × 10−12 | −1.1 |
| 121 | MACRO2 + NO2 + M | MPAN + M | 9.60 × 10−28 | 8.9 | 7.70 × 10−12 | 0.2 |
| 122 | CH3CO3 + NO2 + M | PAN + M | 7.30 × 10−29 | 4.1 | 9.50 × 10−12 | 1.6 |
| Thermal decomposition reactions | ||||||
| A | RT | F | ||||
| 123 | N2O5 + M | NO2 + NO3 | 2.70 × 10−27 | 11,000 | 3.9 | |
| 124 | CLOO + M | CL + O2 | 6.60 × 10−25 | 2502 | 1.5 | |
| 125 | CL2O2 + M | CLO + CLO | 1.72 × 10−27 | 8649 | 3.1 | |
| 126 | HO2NO2 + M | HO2 + NO2 | 2.10 × 10−27 | 10,900 | 3.2 | |
| 127 | MPAN + M | MACRO2 + NO2 | 9.00 × 10−29 | 14,000 | 1.0 | |
| 128 | PAN + M | CH3CO3 + NO2 | 9.00 × 10−29 | 14,000 | 1.2 | |
References
- Stevenson, D.S.; Young, P.J.; Naik, V.; Lamarque, J.-F.; Shindell, D.T.; Voulgarakis, A.; Skeie, R.B.; Dalsoren, S.B.; Myhre, G.; Berntsen, T.K.; et al. Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13, 3063–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monks, P.S.; Archibald, A.T.; Colette, A.; Cooper, O.; Coyle, M.; Derwent, R.; Fowler, D.; Granier, C.; Law, K.S.; Mills, G.E.; et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale: From air quality to short-lived climate forcer. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 8889–8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Guenther, A.B.; Jiang, X.; Heald, C.L.; Sakulyanontvittaya, T.; Duhl, T.; Emmons, L.K.; Wang, X. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model Dev. 2012, 5, 1471–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arneth, A.; Monson, R.K.; Schurgers, G.; Niinemets, Ü.; Palmer, P.I. Why are estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2008, 8, 4605–4620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guenther, A.; Karl, T.; Harley, P.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Palmer, P.I.; Geron, C. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 3181–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, M.A.; Faheem, M.; Mehmood, T.; Yin, Y.; Liu, J. Assessment of meteorological and air quality drivers of elevated ambient ozone in Beijing via machine learning approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 93345–93362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paoletti, E.; Sicard, P.; De Marco, A.; Moura, B.B.; Manzini, J. Ozone Pollution and Urban Greening. Stresses 2025, 5, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sicard, P.; Agathokleous, E.; De Marco, A.; Paoletti, E. Ozone-reducing urban plants: Choose carefully. Science 2022, 377, 585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, R.; Arey, J. Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4605–4638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y.; Yue, X.; Liao, H.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, J.; Chen, L.; Tian, C.; Lei, Y.; Zhou, H.; Ma, Y. Ensemble projection of global isoprene emissions by the end of the 21st century using CMIP6 models. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 267, 118766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiedinmyer, C.; Tie, X.; Guenther, A.; Neilson, R.; Granier, C. Future changes in biogenic isoprene emissions: How might they affect regional and global atmospheric chemistry? Earth Interact. 2006, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chameides, W.L.; Lindsay, R.W.; Richardson, J.; Kiang, C.S. The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 1988, 241, 1473–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacob, D.J.; Wofsy, S.C. Photochemistry of biogenic emissions over the Amazon forest. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 1988, 93, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lelieveld, J.A.; Butler, T.M.; Crowley, J.N.; Dillon, T.J.; Fischer, H.; Ganzeveld, L.; Harder, H.; Lawrence, M.G.; Martinez, M.; Taraborrelli, D.; et al. Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest. Nature 2008, 452, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archibald, A.T.; Cooke, M.C.; Utembe, S.R.; Shallcross, D.E.; Derwent, R.G.; Jenkin, M.E. Impacts of mechanistic changes on HOx formation and recycling in the oxidation of isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 8097–8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Brito, J.; Dorris, M.R.; Rivera-Rios, J.C.; Seco, R.; Bates, K.H.; Artaxo, P.; Duvoisin Junior, S.F.; Keutsch, N.; Kim, S.; et al. Isoprene photochemistry over the Amazon rainforest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 6125–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hewitt, C.N.; Lee, J.D.; MacKenzie, A.R.; Barkley, M.P.; Carslaw, N.; Carver, G.D.; Chappell, N.A.; Coe, H.; Collier, C.; Commane, R.; et al. Overview: Oxidant and particle photochemical processes above a south-east Asian tropical rainforest (the OP3 project): Introduction, rationale, location characteristics and tools. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 169–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wennberg, P.O.; Bates, K.H.; Crounse, J.D.; Dodson, L.G.; McVay, R.C.; Mertens, L.A.; Nguyen, E.; Praske, E.; Schwantes, R.H.; Smarte, M.D.; et al. Gas-phase reactions of isoprene and its major oxidation products. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 3337–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thornton, J.A.; Wooldridge, P.J.; Cohen, R.C.; Martinez, M.; Harder, H.; Brune, W.H.; Williams, E.J.; Roberts, J.M.; Fehsenfeld, F.C.; Hall, S.R.; et al. Ozone production rates as a function of NOx abundances and HOx production rates in the Nashville urban plume. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002, 107, ACH-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fischer, E.V.; Jacob, D.J.; Millet, D.B.; Yantosca, R.M.; Mao, J. The role of the ocean in the global atmospheric budget of acetone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39, L01807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.B.; Brune, W.H.; Crawford, J.H.; Flocke, F.; Jacob, D.J. Chemistry and transport of pollution over the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific: Spring 2006 INTEX-B campaign overview and first results. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 2301–2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monks, S.A.; Arnold, S.R.; Hollaway, M.J.; Pope, R.J.; Wilson, C.; Feng, W.; Emmerson, K.M.; Kerridge, B.J.; Latter, B.L.; Miles, G.M.; et al. The TOMCAT global chemical transport model v1.6: Description of chemical mechanism and model evaluation. Geosci. Model Dev. 2017, 10, 3025–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pöschl, U.; von Kuhlmann, R.; Poisson, N.; Crutzen, P.J. Development and intercomparison of condensed isoprene oxidation mechanisms for global atmospheric modeling. J. Atmos. Chem. 2000, 37, 29–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geiger, H.; Barnes, I.; Bejan, I.; Benter, T.; Spittler, M. The tropospheric degradation of isoprene: An updated module for the regional atmospheric chemistry mechanism. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 1503–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stenke, A.; Schraner, M.; Rozanov, E.; Egorova, T.; Luo, B.; Peter, T. The SOCOL version 3.0 chemistry–climate model: Description, evaluation, and implications from an advanced transport algorithm. Geosci. Model Dev. 2012, 5, 3419–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Revell, L.E.; Stenke, A.; Luo, B.; Kremser, S.; Rozanov, E.; Sukhodolov, T.; Peter, T. Impacts of Mt Pinatubo volcanic aerosol on the tropical stratosphere in chemistry–climate model simulations using CCMI and CMIP6 stratospheric aerosol data. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 8049–8068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöckel, P.; Tost, H.; Pozzer, A.; Kunze, M.; Kirner, O.; Brenninkmeijer, C.A.M.; Brinkop, S.; Cai, D.S.; Dyroff, C.; Eckstein, J.; et al. Earth System Chemistry Integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51. Geosci. Model Dev. 2016, 9, 1153–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Kuhlmann, R.; Lawrence, M.G.; Pöschl, U.; Crutzen, P.J. Sensitivities in global scale modeling of isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2004, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horowitz, L.W.; Fiore, A.M.; Milly, G.P.; Cohen, R.C.; Perring, A.; Wooldridge, P.J.; Hess, P.G.; Emmons, L.K.; Lamarque, J.F. Observational constraints on the chemistry of isoprene nitrates over the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2007, 112, D12S08. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volodin, E.M.; Mortikov, E.V.; Kostrykin, S.V.; Galin, V.Y.; Lykossov, V.N.; Gritsun, A.S.; Diansky, N.A.; Gusev, A.V.; Iakovlev, N.G. Simulation of the present-day climate with the climate model INMCM5. Clim. Dyn. 2017, 49, 3715–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volodin, E.; Gritsun, A. Simulation of observed climate changes in 1850–2014 with climate model INM-CM5. Earth Syst. Dyn. 2018, 9, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volodin, E.M. Simulation of present-day climate with the INMCM60 model. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 2023, 59, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smyshlyaev, S.P.; Yakovlev, A.R.; Usacheva, M.A.; Imanova, A.S.; Romashchenko, D.D.; Motsakov, M.A. Chemistry module for the Earth system model. Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Model. 2024, 39, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burkholder, J.B.; Sander, S.P.; Abbatt, J.; Barker, J.R.; Cappa, C.; Crounse, J.D.; Dibble, T.S.; Huie, R.E.; Kolb, C.E.; Kurylo, M.J.; et al. Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies, Evaluation No. 19; JPL Publication: Pasadena, CA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lamarque, J.F.; Bond, T.C.; Eyring, V.; Granier, C.; Heil, A.; Klimont, Z.; Lee, D.; Liousse, C.; Mieville, A.; Owen, B.; et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: Methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 7017–7039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stavrakou, T.; Müller, J.F.; Bauwens, M.; De Smedt, I.; Van Roozendael, M.; Guenther, A.; Wild, M.; Xia, X. Isoprene emissions over Asia 1979–2012: Impact of climate and land-use changes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 4587–4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bauwens, M.; Stavrakou, T.; Müller, J.F.; De Smedt, I.; Van Roozendael, M.; van der Werf, G.R.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Kaiser, J.W.; Sindelarova, K.; Guenther, A. Nine years of global hydrocarbon emissions based on source inversion of OMI formaldehyde observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 10133–10158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inness, A.; Ades, M.; Agustí-Panareda, A.; Barré, J.; Benedictow, A.; Blechschmidt, A.-M.; Dominguez, J.J.; Engelen, R.; Eskes, H.; Flemming, J.; et al. The CAMS reanalysis of atmospheric composition. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 3515–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelaro, R.; McCarty, W.; Suárez, M.J.; Todling, R.; Molod, A.; Takacs, L.; Randles, C.A.; Darmenov, A.; Bosilovich, M.G.; Reichle, R.; et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 2017, 30, 5419–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wargan, K.; Labow, G.; Frith, S.; Pawson, S.; Livesey, N.; Partyka, G. Evaluation of the ozone fields in NASA’s MERRA-2 reanalysis. J. Clim. 2017, 30, 2961–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hersbach, H.; Bell, B.; Berrisford, P.; Hirahara, S.; Horányi, A.; Muñoz-Sabater, J.; Nicolas, J.; Peubey, C.; Radu, R.; Schepers, D.; et al. The ERA5 global re-analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 146, 1999–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usacheva, M.; Rozanov, E.; Zubov, V.; Smyshlyaev, S. Temperature and Ozone Response to Different Forcing in the Lower Troposphere and Stratosphere. Atmosphere 2024, 15, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, H.B.; Brune, W.H.; Crawford, J.H.; Jacob, D.J.; Russell, P.B. Overview of the summer 2004 Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment–North America (INTEX-A). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2006, 111, D24S01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlando, J.J.; Tyndall, G.S.; Bertman, S.B.; Chen, W.; Burkholder, J.B. Rate coefficient for the reaction of OH with CH2C(CH3)C(O)OONO2 (MPAN). Atmos. Environ. 2002, 36, 1895–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Archibald, A.T.; O’Connor, F.M.; Abraham, N.L.; Archer-Nicholls, S.; Chipperfield, M.P.; Dalvi, M.; Folberth, G.A.; Dennison, F.; Dhomse, S.S.; Griffiths, P.T.; et al. Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1. Geosci. Model Dev. 2020, 13, 1223–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Guo, J.; Deeter, M.N.; Worden, H.M.; Edwards, D.P.; Pan, L.; Zeng, Z.; Hong, J.; Lyu, Y.; Shi, S.; et al. Variable effects of spatial resolution on modeling of nitrogen oxides. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2023, 23, 3031–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peeters, J.; Nguyen, T.L.; Vereecken, L. HOx radical regeneration in the oxidation of isoprene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 5935–5939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Crounse, J.D.; Nielsen, L.B.; Jørgensen, S.; Kjaergaard, H.G.; Wennberg, P.O. Autoxidation of organic compounds in the atmosphere. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 3513–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlton, A.G.; Wiedinmyer, C.; Kroll, J.H. A review of Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) formation from isoprene. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 4987–5005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, J.; Archer-Nicholls, S.; Abraham, N.L.; Shin, Y.M.; Griffiths, P.; Grosvenor, D.P.; Scott, C.E.; Archibald, A.T. Chemistry-driven changes strongly influence climate forcing from vegetation emissions. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacKenzie, A.R.; Langford, B.; Pugh, T.A.M.; Robinson, N.; Misztal, P.K.; Heard, D.E.; Lee, J.D.; Lewis, A.C.; Jones, C.E.; Hopkins, J.R.; et al. The atmospheric chemistry of trace gases and particulate matter emitted by different land uses in Borneo. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011, 366, 3177–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fiore, A.M.; Horowitz, L.W.; Purves, D.W.; Levy, H.; Evans, M.J.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Yantosca, R.M. Evaluating the contribution of changes in isoprene emissions to surface ozone trends over the eastern United States. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2005, 110, D12303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Chemical Species | Name | Functional Role |
|---|---|---|
| Substrate and radicals | ||
| C5H8 | Isoprene | Emitted substrate |
| ISO2 | Isoprene peroxy radical | Key intermediate radical |
| MACRO2 | Methacrolein peroxy radical | Secondary peroxy radical |
| Oxidation products | ||
| MACR | Methacrolein | Primary C5H8 oxidation product |
| HACET | Hydroxyacetone | Carbonyl product |
| MGLY | Methylglyoxal | Dicarbonyl product |
| Termination products (low NOx) | ||
| ISO2H (ISOOH) | Isoprene hydroperoxide | ISO2 + HO2 reaction product |
| MACRO2H (MACROOH) | Methacrolein hydroperoxide | MACRO2 + HO2 reaction product |
| NOx reservoirs | ||
| PAN | Peroxyacetyl nitrate | Global NOx transport (τ~weeks) |
| MPAN | Methacryloyl peroxynitrate | Regional NOx transport (τ~days) |
| ISON | Isoprene nitrate | Local NOx reservoir (τ~hours) |
| NALD | Nitrooxy acetaldehyde | Rapid NO2 recycling |
| Parameter | CTRL (Control) | MIM1 (with Isoprene) |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical mechanism | Base tropospheric scheme (CH4-CO-HOx-NOx) | Base scheme + MIM1 (44 reactions, 16 species) |
| Isoprene emissions | Disabled | ACCMIP, ~503 Tg C yr−1 |
| HCHO, HCOOH, CH3OH emissions | Disabled | ACCMIP, year 2000 climatology |
| C5H8 and product concentrations | Forced to zero | Prognostic |
| Simulation period | 2008–2019 (12 years) | 2008–2019 (12 years) |
| Spin-up | 2008–2009 (2 years) | 2008–2009 (2 years) |
| Analysis period | 2010–2019 (10 years) | 2010–2019 (10 years) |
| Purpose | Baseline state without biogenic VOCs | Assess isoprene impact on O3 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Okulicheva, A.; Tkachenko, M.; Smyshlyaev, S.; Baklanov, A. Numerical Modeling of the Global Effects of Ozone Formation During the Oxidation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds. Climate 2025, 13, 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120251
Okulicheva A, Tkachenko M, Smyshlyaev S, Baklanov A. Numerical Modeling of the Global Effects of Ozone Formation During the Oxidation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds. Climate. 2025; 13(12):251. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120251
Chicago/Turabian StyleOkulicheva, Arina, Margarita Tkachenko, Sergei Smyshlyaev, and Alexander Baklanov. 2025. "Numerical Modeling of the Global Effects of Ozone Formation During the Oxidation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds" Climate 13, no. 12: 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120251
APA StyleOkulicheva, A., Tkachenko, M., Smyshlyaev, S., & Baklanov, A. (2025). Numerical Modeling of the Global Effects of Ozone Formation During the Oxidation of Non-Methane Volatile Organic Compounds. Climate, 13(12), 251. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13120251

