Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.J. and K.N.; Methodology, K.N.; Software, J.J. and V.A.; Validation, A.M., K.N., R.B. and J.J.; Formal analysis, A.M. and R.B.; Investigation, K.N.; Resources, K.N.; Data curation, K.N. and R.B.; Writing—original draft preparation, J.J., V.A., A.M., R.B. and K.N.; writing—review and editing, J.J., V.A., A.M., R.B. and K.N.; Visualization, V.A.; Supervision, K.N.; Project administration, J.J.; Funding acquisition, K.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Figure 1.
Systematic review flow chart.
Figure 1.
Systematic review flow chart.
Figure 2.
Sensor network deployment distribution by TRL.
Figure 2.
Sensor network deployment distribution by TRL.
Figure 3.
Sensor network deployment distribution by field of the goal network.
Figure 3.
Sensor network deployment distribution by field of the goal network.
Figure 4.
Deployment distribution between TRL in each of the sample years.
Figure 4.
Deployment distribution between TRL in each of the sample years.
Figure 5.
Deployment distribution between TRL and existence of a goal network.
Figure 5.
Deployment distribution between TRL and existence of a goal network.
Figure 6.
Deployment distribution between TRL and node connection type.
Figure 6.
Deployment distribution between TRL and node connection type.
Figure 7.
Deployment distribution between TRL and node mobility.
Figure 7.
Deployment distribution between TRL and node mobility.
Figure 8.
Deployment distribution between TRL and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 8.
Deployment distribution between TRL and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 9.
Deployment distribution between TRL and deployment type.
Figure 9.
Deployment distribution between TRL and deployment type.
Figure 10.
Deployment distribution between TRL and field of the goal network.
Figure 10.
Deployment distribution between TRL and field of the goal network.
Figure 11.
Deployment distribution between field of the goal network and TRL.
Figure 11.
Deployment distribution between field of the goal network and TRL.
Figure 12.
Deployment distribution between TRL and subject of the goal network.
Figure 12.
Deployment distribution between TRL and subject of the goal network.
Figure 13.
Deployment distribution between TRL and scale of the goal network.
Figure 13.
Deployment distribution between TRL and scale of the goal network.
Figure 14.
Deployment distribution between year and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 14.
Deployment distribution between year and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 15.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and TRL.
Figure 15.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and TRL.
Figure 16.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and existence of goal network.
Figure 16.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and existence of goal network.
Figure 17.
Deployment scale distribution between usage of rich nodes.
Figure 17.
Deployment scale distribution between usage of rich nodes.
Figure 18.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and deployment type.
Figure 18.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and deployment type.
Figure 19.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and node mobility.
Figure 19.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and node mobility.
Figure 20.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and deployment interactivity.
Figure 20.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and deployment interactivity.
Figure 21.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and node connection type.
Figure 21.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and node connection type.
Figure 22.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment field.
Figure 22.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment field.
Figure 23.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment scale.
Figure 23.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment scale.
Figure 24.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment subject.
Figure 24.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment subject.
Figure 25.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment interactivity.
Figure 25.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment interactivity.
Figure 26.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and existence of a goal network.
Figure 26.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and existence of a goal network.
Figure 27.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 27.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and usage of rich nodes.
Figure 28.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment type.
Figure 28.
Deployment distribution between node mobility and deployment type.
Figure 29.
Deployment distribution between deployment scale and interactivity.
Figure 29.
Deployment distribution between deployment scale and interactivity.
Figure 30.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and year.
Figure 30.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and year.
Figure 31.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment type.
Figure 31.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment type.
Figure 32.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment scale.
Figure 32.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment scale.
Figure 33.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and existence of a goal network.
Figure 33.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and existence of a goal network.
Figure 34.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment field. World around us: Agriculture and Environment, Technology we use: Communication, Industry, Infrastructure, Transport, Other: Education, Entertainment, Health and Wellbeing, Multiple, Research, Safety.
Figure 34.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and deployment field. World around us: Agriculture and Environment, Technology we use: Communication, Industry, Infrastructure, Transport, Other: Education, Entertainment, Health and Wellbeing, Multiple, Research, Safety.
Figure 35.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and usage of testbed facilities.
Figure 35.
Deployment distribution between usage of rich nodes and usage of testbed facilities.
Figure 36.
Deployment distribution between deployment subject and node connection type.
Figure 36.
Deployment distribution between deployment subject and node connection type.
Figure 37.
Deployment distribution between node connection type and deployment type.
Figure 37.
Deployment distribution between node connection type and deployment type.
Figure 38.
Deployment distribution between node connection type and existence of a goal network.
Figure 38.
Deployment distribution between node connection type and existence of a goal network.
Figure 39.
Deployment distribution between subject of the goal network and year.
Figure 39.
Deployment distribution between subject of the goal network and year.
Figure 40.
Deployment distribution between subject and scale of the goal network.
Figure 40.
Deployment distribution between subject and scale of the goal network.
Figure 41.
Deployment distribution between scale of the goal network and year.
Figure 41.
Deployment distribution between scale of the goal network and year.
Figure 42.
Deployment distribution between scale and subject of the goal network.
Figure 42.
Deployment distribution between scale and subject of the goal network.
Table 1.
Sensor network deployment distribution by year.
Table 1.
Sensor network deployment distribution by year.
Year | Records | Percentage |
---|
2013 | 619 | 20.24% |
2014 | 616 | 20.14% |
2015 | 606 | 19.81% |
2016 | 596 | 19.48% |
2017 | 622 | 20.33% |
Table 2.
Sensor network deployment distribution by having a goal network.
Table 2.
Sensor network deployment distribution by having a goal network.
Goal Network | Records | Percentage |
---|
True | 1825 | 59.66% |
False | 1234 | 40.34% |
Table 3.
Sensor network deployment distribution by scale of the goal network.
Table 3.
Sensor network deployment distribution by scale of the goal network.
Scale | Records | Percentage |
---|
Building | 530 | 29.04% |
Property | 447 | 24.49% |
Single actor | 345 | 18.90% |
Region | 317 | 17.37% |
Room | 131 | 7.18% |
Country | 27 | 1.48% |
Global | 24 | 1.32% |
None | 4 | 0.22% |
Total | 1825 | |
Table 4.
Sensor network deployment distribution by interactivity of the goal network.
Table 4.
Sensor network deployment distribution by interactivity of the goal network.
Interactivity | Records | Percentage |
---|
Passive | 1448 | 79.34% |
Interactive | 375 | 20.55% |
None | 2 | 0.11% |
Total | 1285 | |
Table 5.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and technology readiness level.
Table 5.
Deployment distribution between usage of testbed facilities and technology readiness level.
TRL | Deployments Using Testbed Facility | Deployments Total |
---|
TRL3 | 3 (2.9%) | 103 |
TRL4 | 26 (3.8%) | 682 |
TRL5 | 346 (38.9%) | 888 |
TRL6 | 54 (11.3%) | 479 |
TRL7 | 44 (5.3%) | 826 |
TRL8 | 5 (6.2%) | 81 |
Total | 478 (15.63%) | 3059 |
Table 6.
Deployments between usage of testbed facilities and node mobility.
Table 6.
Deployments between usage of testbed facilities and node mobility.
Testbed Facilities | Static | Mixed | Mobile | Total |
---|
No | 1836 (74.3%) | 117 (4.7%) | 518 (21.0%) | 2471 (100%) |
Part of | 51 (79.7%) | 3 (4.7%) | 10 (15.6%) | 64 (100%) |
Used | 399 (84.7%) | 20 (4.2%) | 52 (11.1%) | 471 (100%) |