Next Article in Journal
Phenolic Profile and Cholinesterase Inhibitory Properties of Three Chilean Altiplano Plants: Clinopodium gilliesii (Benth.) Kuntze [Lamiaceae], Mutisia acuminata Ruiz & Pav. var. hirsuta (Meyen) Cabrera, and Tagetes multiflora (Kunth) [Asteraceae]
Previous Article in Journal
Essential Oils and Biological Activities of Eucalyptus falcata, E. sideroxylon and E. citriodora Growing in Tunisia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Analysis of Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channel Genes Related to Pollen Development in Rice
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/plants12040817
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The LHT Gene Family in Rice: Molecular Characterization, Transport Functions and Expression Analysis

by
Tian Fan
*,†,
Chunting Wu
†,
Weiqi Yang
,
Tianxiao Lv
,
Yuping Zhou
and
Changen Tian
*
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Adaptation and Molecular Design, Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Functional Study on Plant Stress-Resistant Genes, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These two authors contributed equally to the work.
Plants 2023, 12(4), 817; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040817
Submission received: 10 November 2022 / Revised: 9 February 2023 / Accepted: 10 February 2023 / Published: 12 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Rice and Tomato Molecular Breeding)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amino acid transporters (AATs) are integral membrane proteins and play important roles in plant growth and development as well as environmental responses. In contrast to the amino acid permease (AAP) subfamily, functional studies of the lysine and histidine transporter (LHT) subfamily have not been made in rice. In the current study, six LHT genes were found in the rice genome. To further investigate the functions of these genes, analyses were performed regarding gene and protein structures, chromosomal locations, evolutionary relationships, cis-acting elements of promoters, gene expression, and yeast complementation. We found that the six OsLHT genes are distributed on 4 out of the 12 chromosomes and that the six OsLHT genes were grouped into two clusters based on the phylogenetic analysis. Protein structure analyses showed that each OsLHT protein has 11 helical transmembrane domains. Yeast complementation assays showed that these OsLHT genes have conserved transport substrates within each cluster. The four members from cluster 1 showed broad amino acid selectivity, while OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 may transport other substrates besides amino acids. Additionally, quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the six OsLHT genes revealed that they have different expression patterns at different developmental stages and in different tissues. It also revealed that some OsLHT genes were responsive to PEG, NaCl and cold treatments, indicating their critical roles in abiotic stress response. Our results will be useful for further characterizing the crucial biological functions of rice LHT genes.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen (N) is an important nutrient for the growth and development of plants. Plants absorb both inorganic nitrogen (ammonium and nitrate) and organic nitrogen (amino acids, peptides and proteins) by plant roots from the soil [1]. For organic nitrogen, amino acids are the primary transport form in most plant species. In order to meet the N requirements of developing sink organs, amino acids produced in leaves or obtained from roots are transported by phloem [2]. In plants, transport proteins often mediate the transport of amino acids. Amino acid transporters (AATs) are integral membrane proteins which are involved in various processes of plant growth and development, such as absorption, long-distance transport, the distribution of amino acids, and responses to pathogen infection and abiotic stresses [3].
AATs have been found and identified in a variety of plant species, such as Arabidopsis [4], rice [5], soybean [6], poplar [7], potato [8], wheat [9], among others. The AATs are classified into three main families in plants: APCs (the amino acid-polyamine-choline transporter family), ATFs (the amino acid transporter family, also known as the AAAP family) and the recently discovered UMAMITs (the usually multiple acids move in and out transporter family) [10]. The ATF family contains at least eight subfamilies, such as LHTs (lysine and histidine transporters), AUXs (auxin transporters), ProTs (proline transporters), ATLs (amino acid transporter-like proteins), GATs (c-aminobutyric acid transporters), AAPs (amino acid permeases), ANTs (aromatic and neutral amino acid transporters) and VAATs (vesicular aminergic-associated transporters) [10]. Typically, the members of the AUX subfamily transport auxin rather than amino acids [11]. In addition, the APC family is divided into three subfamilies in plants: CATs (cationic amino acid transporters), ACTs (amino acid/choline transporters) and PHSs (polyamine H+-symporters) [12]. Recently, it was proposed that UMAMITs are members of the nodulin-like gene family [13] and that several of the family’s members play major roles in bidirectional amino acid transport [14]. Among these families, the AAP family has received the most focus in plants. Compared to the AAP family, further functional studies of the LHT family are required.
In model plants, such as Arabidopsis [15,16,17] and rice [18,19,20], some LHT protein functions have been investigated to date. In Arabidopsis, 10 members named LHT1 to LHT10 have been identified. AtLHT1 is mainly expressed on the surfaces of roots and plays a role in the root absorption of neutral and acidic amino acids and importation into leaf mesophyll cells [16]. Disruption to AtLHT1 was found to result in the defective uptake of a range of amino acids and, ultimately, decreases in shoot biomass and seed yield [16]. In addition, AtLHT1 also acts as a negative regulator of disease resistance; its mutation increases disease resistance to a wide range of pathogens in an SA-dependent manner [17]. Besides amino acids, another study showed that AtLHT1 and AtLHT2 may transport ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate), which acts as a biosynthetic precursor of ethylene [21,22]. Recent research has demonstrated that AtLHT1 can also be responsible for the translocation of pesticide–amino acid conjugates in Arabidopsis [23,24]. AtLHT6 is highly expressed in the roots and is involved in the uptake of acidic amino acids and alanine at low and high concentrations [25]. However, it is noteworthy that the study of LHT transporters has been focused on Arabidopsis, and our knowledge of LHT family members in rice is still very limited. Zhao et al. [5] identified six LHT members in rice by means of a genome-wide survey; only the function of OsLHT1 has been studied in depth in recent studies. OsLHT1 is expressed throughout the root, including the stele, root hairs, exodermis, epidermis, cortex cells, endodermis and sclerenchyma, indicating its function in amino acid acquisition and movement into steles [18]. Meanwhile, disruption to OsLHT1 decreased amino acid levels in xylem sap and inhibited root-to-shoot amino acid translocation [19]. In addition, OsLHT1 has been demonstrated to be involved in phloem loading and allocation from leaves to panicles. Knockout of OsLHT1 affected seed storage and decreased amino acid allocations to grains, resulting in lower grain yield and N-utilization efficiency [19].
Thus, in order to understand the significance of the OsLHT gene family with respect to plant growth, development and grain quality in rice, we performed systematic identifications and comprehensive characterizations. In this study, we identified the chromosomal locations, physicochemical properties, duplication events, phylogenetic relationships, gene structures and protein three-dimensional structures of the OsLHT genes and complemented these investigations with research on subcellular localization, a transport substrate assay, and analysis of the gene expression patterns of all the LHTs in various tissues and under abiotic stress conditions. The goal was to provide a theoretical foundation for further functional analysis and study of the molecular mechanisms of the rice LHT genes involved in rice growth, development and stress resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the LHT Gene Family in Rice

In this study, name searches with keywords (e.g., Lysine/Histidine transporter) were made to obtain annotated candidates of LHT family members in RAP-DB (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/) (accessed on 20 June 2022). These keyword searches resulted in a total of six LHT candidates. Next, the six LHT candidate sequences were subjected to InterProScan to confirm the presence of IPR013057 domains. Altogether, six LHTs were identified in rice. This was consistent with the previous data published for the rice AAT family [5]. Here, we employ the gene nomenclature published by Zhao et al. [5] for rice LHTs. Detailed information about the chromosomal location, FL-cDNA, ORF length and gene locus for each OsLHT gene and the physicochemical properties of the OsLHT proteins are listed in Table 1. The proteins encoded by OsLHT genes had predicted molecular weights of 47.8 to 55.0 kDa and lengths ranging from 444 to 512 amino acids. In addition, the predicted pI values ranged from 8.87 to 9.20, and all were below 10.0.
The chromosomal locations of the OsLHT genes were determined according to the gene starting position in the rice chromosomes. The OsLHT genes were randomly distributed on four chromosomes (Figure S1). Both OsLHT4 and OsLHT5 were localized on chromosome 4, OsLHT2 and OsLHT6 were localized on chromosome 12, while OsLHT1 and OsLHT3 were localized on chromosomes 8 and 5, respectively (Figure S1). In order to understand the expansion patterns of the OsLHT gene family, analyses of tandem duplication and segmental duplication were performed. Based on the rice segmental duplication database from RGAP and chromosome distribution analysis, we found that no pairs of genes could be allocated to rice segmental duplication blocks. This suggested that tandem duplication and segmental duplication events were not the cause of the OsLHT gene family’s expansion.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of the OsLHT Gene Family

In order to further evaluate in detail phylogenetic relationships and molecular evolution, a maximum-likelihood tree was constructed using MEGA X software by aligning full-length LHT amino acid sequences from one non-vascular land plant (Physcomitrella patens, 3 proteins), one non-seed vascular plant (Selaginella moellendorffii, 8 proteins) and five seed plants, including Solanum lycopersicum (6 proteins), Arabidopsis thaliana (10 proteins), Sorghum bicolor (8 proteins), Oryza sativa (6 proteins) and Medicago truncatula (7 proteins).
The identified LHT proteins are grouped in three main clusters (Figure 1). Cluster 1 includes LHT proteins of seed plants, cluster 2 contains some non-seed vascular plant and all non-vascular LHT proteins, and cluster 3 contains seed plant and the remainder of the non-seed vascular plant Selaginella proteins. Cluster 1 contains 8 of the 10 Arabidopsis, 6 of the 7 Medicago, 4 of the 6 rice, 5 of the 6 tomato and all of the sorghum LHTs (Figure 1). Thus, cluster 1 was found to contain the largest number of LHT genes (Figure 1). In addition, the simultaneous presence of monocots and eudicots in most clades of the cluster 1. These results indicated that the formation of the LHT family occurred before the split of dicots and monocots and that cluster 1 is only present in flowering plant species. Cluster 2 includes all Physcomitrella LHT genes and 6 out of 8 Selaginella LHT genes, but no genes from seed plants (Figure 1). It appears that the LHT genes in cluster 2 may have evolved independently in Physcomitrella and Selaginella. Meanwhile, the transport functions of LHT genes from cluster 2 may not be required in higher plants, though they are required in early land plants. Cluster 3 contains 2 of the 10 Arabidopsis, 1 of the 7 Medicago, 2 of the 6 rice, 1 of the 6 tomato and 2 of the 8 Selaginella LHT genes (Figure 1). This indicates that the LHT genes in cluster 3 have other functions which are required by both non-seed vascular plants and seed plants.

2.3. OsLHT Gene Structures and Protein Structures

To investigate the structural diversity of the OsLHT genes, an unrooted phylogenetic tree was constructed by aligning the full-length sequences of the six OsLHT proteins. The members of the OsLHT family can be classified into two clusters containing four and two members, respectively (Figure 2). We compared the transcript and genomic sequences of each OsLHT gene to examine the intron/exon organization using the GSDS website (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) (accessed on 5 August 2022). The results showed that there are between three and five introns in the coding sequences of the six OsLHT genes. Members of the same subfamily have similar intron/exon structures. Of note, only the OsLHT3 gene is not upstream and downstream.
We identified 10 distinct motifs using the MEME website to investigate the diversification of the OsLHT proteins (Figure 3). The lengths and amino acid sequences of all 10 putative motifs are listed in Figure S2. The potential functions of each motif were determined by SMART and Pfam, revealing that seven motifs (2–7 and 9) encode Aa-trans domains, while the remaining three motifs do not. Motifs 1–9 were widely distributed in all the OsLHT proteins, while motif 10 was only found in the OsLHT1-4 protein. The results indicated that the most conserved motifs found in the OsLHT proteins were highly compatible with their evolutionary relationships and that the cluster had similar conserved motifs in terms of both numbers and varieties.
Previous studies have reported that the members of the LHT family can transport amino acids in Arabidopsis and rice [16,18]. To verify the transport function of LHT genes, the membrane-protein topology prediction tool DeepTMHMM was used to predict the putative TM regions; each OsLHT protein had 11 helical TMs. To further examine the relationship between the conserved motifs and the TM areas of OsLHT proteins, multiple-sequence alignment was performed and highlighted the secondary structures, conserved motifs and TM regions, as shown in Figure 3. The TM regions and conserved motifs were found to be highly correlated. Motifs 4 and 5 included the complete TM 3 and TM 8 regions, while the majority of the TM 2 and TM 7 areas were found in motifs 7 and 9. The tenth TM area was the location of motif 3, which continued into the subsequent sequences after the eleventh TM region. In addition, motif 1 contained the most regions of TM 6 and TM 7, while motifs 2, 6 and 8, respectively, contained the complete TMs 1, 5 and 9 and most regions of TMs 2, 4 and 10. The OsLHT proteins had a total of 14 α-helices and 7 η-helices, and only α2, α4, η2, η3, η4, η6 and η7 were found in the non-transmembrane regions, while the remaining secondary structures were found in the transmembrane areas to maintain the transport function of the LHT proteins (Figure 3). The structures of the OsLHT proteins were predicted using SwissModel servers (Figure 4). It became apparent that all predicted OsLHT proteins had 11 helical TMs and displayed complex 3D structures, including multiple secondary structures (Figure 4). In addition, in contrast to OsLHT1, 2, 5 and 6, OsLHT3 and OsLHT4 had a partial a-helix in the extracellular portion between the fifth transmembrane region and the sixth transmembrane region (Figure 4).

2.4. The Subcellular Localization of OsLHTs

To understand the basal function of OsLHT proteins, we first predicted their possible subcellular localizations using the WoLF PSORT website. The prediction results indicated that most OsLHTs are mainly localized in the cell plasma membrane (Table 1). Next, the fusion proteins of OsLHTs and GFP under the CMV 35S promoter were constructed and transiently expressed in Arabidopsis protoplasts. The GFP fluorescence signal was observed after 12–18 h incubation. The protoplasts expressing GFP alone acted as a positive control. The results showed that OsLHT1-4 were localized in the plasma membrane, while OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 were localized in the plasma membrane and cytosol (Figure 5).

2.5. The Transport Functions of OsLHTs

To investigate the transport functionalities of OsLHTs, yeast function complementation experiments were conducted using the yeast mutant 22Δ10a, which has an amino acid transport defect. 22Δ10a, lacking ten plasma membrane amino acid transporters, is unable to grow on media containing proteinogenic amino acids or c-aminobutyric acid (GABA) as the sole N source [26]. We cloned the six OsLHT genes into a yeast expression vector pDR195 and transformed it into the wild-type strain 23344c and the mutant strain 22Δ10a. Next, yeast cells expressing the six OsLHT genes and the empty vector pDR195 were grown on solid media containing acidic, basic and neutral amino acids at 3 mM concentrations. The results indicated that the six members of the OsLHT gene family have different amino acid selectivities. OsLHT1-expressing yeast was able to grow on all tested amino acid media, including the acidic amino acid and most of the neutral amino acid media (Figure 6). The broad amino acid selectivity of OsLHT1 is also consistent with the substrate analysis in Xenopus oocytes by Wang et al. [18]. Similar to OsLHT1, OsLHT2 also showed broad amino acid selectivity (Figure 6). In contrast to OsLHT1, yeast cells expressing OsLHT3 and OsLHT4 genes displayed similar growth patterns to the empty vector pDR195 on the media with Phenylalanine and tyrosine (Figure 6). By contrast, yeast cells expressing OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 genes were not able to grow on the media with the tested amino acids as the only N source (Figure 6).
To further investigate the effect of the different amino acids as the sole nitrogen sources on OsLHT genes expression, 7 days after germination, rice seedlings were nitrogen-starved for 24 h and then provided with ammonium nitrate or various amino acids as a sole N source. After 24 h of incubation, OsLHT1 transcript levels were obviously higher in plants incubated with various amino acids, including Ile, Phe, Asp, Ala, Gln, Pro, Val, Thr and Gly, than those incubated in the ammonium nitrate (Figure S3). The OsLHT4 gene exhibited minor upregulation in the expression of several amino acids (Ile, Phe, Ala, Asn, Glu, Val and Thr) as compared with the ammonium nitrate condition (Figure S3). On the contrary, the expression levels of OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 with respect to the detected amino acids did not increase compared with the ammonium nitrate condition (Figure S3). We did not analyze OsLHT2 and OsLHT3 due to their expression levels in roots 7 days after germination being very low. These results indicated that OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 may transport other substrates than amino acids.

2.6. Analysis of Promoter Cis-Elements in the OsLHT Gene Family

To further elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of the OsLHT genes in rice, we extracted and analyzed the upstream 2000 bp sequences of the ATG initiation codons of the six OsLHT genes using PlantCARE for cis-element analysis. The results showed that the detected cis-elements could be divided into four categories: phytohormones, light responsiveness, abiotic stress and plant growth (Figure 7, Table S2). The phytohormone-responsive cis-elements included the AuxRR-core/TGA-element (auxin response), ABRE (abscisic acid response), the P-box (gibberellin response), the TGACG-motif/CGTCA-motif (MeJA response) and the TCA-Element (salicylic acid response). The light-responsive cis-elements included the G-box, chs-CMA2a/b, TCT-motif, ATCT-motif, Box4, TCCC-motif, GT1-motif, I-box, GATA-motif, circadian, Sp1, ACE and MRE. The stress-related elements included the TC-rich repeats (defense and stress response), LTR (low temperature), CCAAT-box (MYBHv1 binding site), ARE/GC motifs (anoxic/anaerobic response) and MBS (drought response). The plant growth categories included CAT-box (meristem expression) and O2-site (zein metabolism). The types and locations of these elements are shown in Figure 7A, and the number of elements is displayed in Figure 7B. The light-responsive elements were the most abundant cis-elements in the OsLHT genes. Each gene had more than four light-responsive elements. The elements related to abiotic stress were also distributed in OsLHT genes, especially in LTR and ARE/GC motifs. We also found that many phytohormone-responsive cis-elements related to abscisic acid, auxin and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) were widely distributed in OsLHT genes, suggesting that these OsLHT genes may be involved in hormone signaling and stress response.

2.7. Expression Profiling of OsLHT Genes

As we know, the comprehensive analysis of gene expression patterns in different tissues will help us to further understand the functions of LHT genes in rice. The expression patterns at various developmental stages and in various organs were examined to assess the transcription of OsLHT genes throughout the entire rice life cycle (Figure 8 and Figure S4). The results demonstrated that OsLHT genes displayed abundant expression profiles in various tissues. The expression profiles of the OsLHT1 genes exhibited strong constitutive expressions in all tested tissues. OsLHT2 and OsLHT3 were specifically expressed in the reproductive organs of the panicles, leaf sheaths and culms. OsLHT4 displayed higher expression in roots in the vegetative period and in the leaf sheaths and culms in the reproductive period. OsLHT5 was predominantly expressed in leaf sheaths. OsLHT6 displayed high expression in all tested tissues except the leaf, its highest expression levels being in the culm. OsLHT genes displayed a variety of expression patterns, including tissue-specific expression and constitutive expression.
For the abiotic stress treatment (Figure 9 and Figure S5), the OsLHT genes showed different response patterns under PEG, NaCl and cold stress. Following PEG treatment, the transcript levels of OsLHT1 and OsLHT2 were slightly upregulated during early treatment, followed by a decrease in the roots and shoots. The expression of OsLHT3 peaked at 24 h in the roots, while it was highly expressed at 6 h in the shoots. For OsLHT4 and OsLHT5, the expression levels gradually decreased from the initial time point to 2 h in the roots and 6 h in the shoots. The expression of OsLHT6 was initially upregulated to high levels at 0.5 h and then downregulated in the roots and was gradually downregulated in the shoots. Following NaCl treatment, three genes (OsLHT1, OsLHT2 and OsLHT6) showed slight changes in expression levels in both the roots and shoots. OsLHT3 reached its peak during the initial (0.5 h) treatment, followed by a decrease in expression during the subsequent treatment for the shoots. By contrast, the expression of OsLHT3 was the lowest at 2 h, with a gradual increase at all later time points for the roots. The expressions of OsLHT4 and OsLHT5 were strongly downregulated at 0.5 h in both roots and shoots. Under cold stress, there were three genes (OsLHT4, OsLHT5 and OsLHT6) that exhibited minor changes in expression levels in both roots and shoots at all time points. For the roots, OsLHT1 and OsLHT3 were obviously upregulated; their expression levels peaked at 0.5 h and 6 h. For the shoots, only the expression of OsLHT2 exhibited obvious upregulation, at 0.5 h.
From the heat map of the qRT-PCR analysis results for the OsLHT genes (Figure 10 and Figure S6), a few genes were found to be ABA- and MeJA-responsive. Following ABA treatment, all the genes except OsLHT2 showed slight changes in their expression levels in both roots and shoots. OsLHT2 was upregulated during the initial phase of the treatment, peaking at 2 h, but was downregulated at later time points for the roots. Under MeJA treatment, OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 showed slight changes in expression levels in both roots and shoots. The expression of OsLHT4 was downregulated at 0.5 h in both roots and shoots. For the roots, OsLHT1, OsLHT2 and OsLHT3 were obviously upregulated; their expression levels peaked at 0.5 h. For the shoots, OsLHT2 and OsLHT3 were upregulated at 2 h and 0.5 h. These results suggest that some OsLHT genes might play important roles in responses to cold, PEG, ABA, NaCl and MeJA treatments.

3. Discussion

Amino acid transporters are some of the main determinants of N distribution and play a pivotal role in the process of plant development and growth. AATs are widely distributed in many higher plants and have been thoroughly systematically identified and characterized in many plants, such as Tartary buckwheat (104) [27], Arabidopsis (65) [4], soybean (189) [6], potato (72) [8], rice (85) [5], common wheat (297) [9], etc. Of eight subfamilies of AATs, the AAP family has received the most focus in plants. Compared with the AAP family, further functional studies on the LHT family are required. Thus, in this study, we focused on rice crops, and performed a systematic identification and comprehensive characterization of the LHT gene family. Zhao et al. reported the genomic frameworks, classifications, duplication manners, conserved motifs and expression profiles of all 85 OsAAT members, including the subfamilies of AAPs, LHTs, ProTs, GATs, AUXs, ANTs, ATLs, CATs, ACTs and PHSs [5]. However, in our study, we mainly focused on the LHT subfamily of amino acid transporters. In addition to identifying the chromosomal locations, physicochemical properties, duplication events, phylogenetic relationships, cis-acting elements of promoters, gene structures and protein three-dimensional structures of the OsLHT genes, we also analyzed the transport functions of these genes through various experiments, such as subcellular localizations, transport substrate assays and analyses of gene expression patterns in various amino acid conditions. Heterologous yeast complementation experiments were performed to determine whether OsLHT proteins are functional transporters and their substrate specificities. Transient expression in Arabidopsis protoplasts suggested that most of the OsLHT proteins were localized to the plasma membrane, which is consistent with their functions as amino acid transporters. Therefore, our results can help to understand the substrate selectivity of OsLHT genes for various amino acids and thus provide theoretical guidance for studying the role of OsLHT genes in the uptake and partitioning of amino acids for plant growth and development.
The numbers of members of the LHT gene family in different plants varies, from 6 in rice to 24 in soybean and wheat. The number of LHT genes in rice was the lowest compared with other plants. Furthermore, OsLHT genes were classified into three clusters according to phylogenetic analysis of LHT proteins from Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Medicago truncatula, Solanum lycopersicum and Sorghum bicolor (Figure 1). The LHT gene family evolved before the differentiation of dicots and monocots, as evidenced by the clustering of LHT genes in the same clade in both dicots and monocots. The phylogenetic analysis showed the evolutionary relationships between the rice LHT proteins, and also indicated that cluster I contained the largest number of LHT gene members and that all the members came from seed plants. For the eight Arabidopsis genes, three pairs (AtLHT2/AtLHT5, AtLHT1/AtLHT10 and AtLHT3/AtLHT6) were generated by a duplication event. By contrast, no duplicated gene pairs of LHT were found in rice (Figure 1). This suggested that the replication of LHT genes in monocots is not as extensive as in eudicots. Research on the function of plant LHTs was mainly performed in Arabidopsis; some studies have shown some that Arabidopsis LHT transporters in cluster 1 are expressed in male and female floral tissues, indicating a role in reproduction; for example, the fact that LHT2 and LHT6 were found to be expressed in tapetal cells strongly suggests that amino acids are transported in the tapetum to maintain pollen development [28]. LHT6 is expressed in abundance in anther tissues, where it may play a role in the supply of amino acids for growth. LHT5 is expressed in pollen tubes and may be involved in the acquisition of amino acids necessary for tube elongation. LHT5 and LHT6 are expressed in transmission tissues [29]. In our study, four rice LHT transporters in cluster 1 were found to be mainly expressed in the reproductive organs of the panicles, leaf sheaths and culms. OsLHT1 genes exhibited strong constitutive expression in various tissues (Figure 8 and Figure S4). OsLHT2 and OsLHT3 were mainly expressed specifically in the reproductive organs of the panicles, leaf sheaths and culms (Figure 8 and Figure S4). OsLHT4 displayed higher expression in roots in the vegetative period and in the leaf sheaths and culms in the reproductive period (Figure 8 and Figure S4). This suggested that the LHT genes might be crucial for effective sexual plant reproduction. Additionally, this is consistent with a study on Arabidopsis [29]. Although the expression pattern of LHT indicates that it may participate in reproductive development, there is no report on its function in reproduction. Moreover, OsLHT1 and OsLHT4 seem to have additional functions, as they are expressed in other organs, such as roots and leaves in the vegetative period. For example, some studies have shown that OsLHT1 is a key transporter in root uptake and root-to-shoot amino acid allocation. It also mediates the translocation of amino acids from vegetative to reproductive organs for nutrition quality and seed yield [19,20]. Cluster 2 includes total Physcomitrella LHT genes and parts of Selaginella LHT genes but none from seed plants (Figure 1). It appears that the transport functions of LHT genes from cluster 2 may not be required in higher plants, though they are required in early land plants. Cluster 3 contains both non-seed vascular plants and seed plants (Figure 1), indicating that the LHT genes from cluster 3 have other functions which are required by both non-seed vascular plants and seed plants. Arabidopsis AtLHT4 and AtLHT7 are not only involved in anther and pollen development; they are also expressed in roots and stems [30]. Similarly, OsLHT5 was found to be predominantly expressed in leaf sheaths (Figure 8 and Figure S4). OsLHT6 displayed high expression levels in all tested tissues except leaf tissues, with its highest expression in the culm (Figure 8 and Figure S4). OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 within cluster 3 shared similarities in motif distribution (Figure 3), gene structure (Figure 2) and transport substrate (Figure 6), implying the reliability of the subfamily classification. The diverse functions of LHT genes still need further research.
As a class of amino acid transport proteins, the transport substrate determines the function of the gene to a certain extent. Several LHT members, including AtLHT1 [16], AtLHT6 [25] and OsLHT1 [20], have been reported to take up amino acids from external media. In fact, OsLHT1-related uptake seems to contribute to about 45% of total aspartate uptake [20]. This suggests that LHT genes plays an important role in the uptake of amino acids by roots. Although the underlying molecular mechanisms of amino acid uptake are unknown, the identification of transport substrates can help us better understand the functions of genes. In Arabidopsis, AtLHT2 transports neutral amino acids with high affinity [28]. AtLHT6 absorbs acidic and some neutral amino acids, but not basic amino acids [25]. In rice, the substrate specificities of six LHT members have not been determined until now, except that of OsLHT1. Similar to AtLHT2 and AtLHT6, OsLHT1 was confirmed to transport a wide range of amino acids, including basic, neutral and acidic amino acids, and displayed a preference for neutral and acidic amino acids in yeast and Xenopus oocytes [18]. Our yeast complementation study produced similar results (Figure 6). Regarding the other members of the OsLHT gene family, OsLHT2 also showed broad amino acid selectivity. OsLHT3 and OsLHT4 were able to transport all of the test amino acids except phenylalanine and tyrosine. By contrast, OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 were not able to transport all the test amino acids (Figure 6). Meanwhile, the expression levels of OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 in the different amino acids as sole N sources did not increase compared with the ammonium nitrate condition (Figure S3). Previous studies have reported that, besides amino acids, other substrates, including ACC [21,22], indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [31], choline [32], glycine betaine [32,33] and amino acid-based pesticides [24,34], can also be transported by some amino acid transporters. ACC, another non-proteinogenic a-amino acid, has been shown to be transported by AtLHT1 and AtLHT2 [21,22]. Recently, AtLHT1 has been found to facilitate the movement of pesticide–amino acid conjugates within plants [24]. Thus, we speculated that OsLHT5 and OsLHT6 may transport other substrates besides amino acids. The diversity of substrates suggests that OsLHT genes may be involved in various physiological progress in plants. Although in this study we performed a preliminary analysis of the substrates of the six LHT genes in rice by yeast complementation experiments, further verifications and determinations of the affinities of the substrates via Xenopus oocyte injection experiments are required. To better study the gene functions, the uptake and in vivo transport of 15N-labeled amino acids in the lht knockout mutant could be examined.
As we know, drought, salt and cold are the most severe abiotic stresses in agricultural production. The accumulation of proline plays an important role in protecting plants from abiotic stresses [35]. Proline may accumulate in plants due to improved synthesis and reduced degradation as well as proline transport within plants [35]. The cis-elements in promoters will regulate gene expression when they are stimulated by various environmental conditions. We identified cis-elements in the promoters of OsLHT genes, which were involved in light responsiveness, hormonal responses and environment responses (Figure 7). These identifications indicated that OsLHT genes might be involved in the regulation of abiotic stress. Therefore, we used qRT-PCR and searched the TENOR (https://tenor.dna.affrc.go.jp/) (accessed on 9 November 2022) and RiceXPro (https://ricexpro.dna.affrc.go.jp/) (accessed on 9 November 2022) databases to examine the expression profiles of OsLHT family members under cold, NaCl and PEG stresses (Figure 9 and Figure S5). The results showed that OsLHT1 and OsLHT3 were upregulated in roots in response to the PEG, NaCl and cold treatments and that OsLHT6 was upregulated in roots in response to the PEG treatment (Figure 9 and Figure S5). OsLHT1 has been reported to transport proline [18]. Our study also demonstrated that OsLHT1 and OsLHT3 can transport proline, but that OsLHT6 cannot transport proline. Therefore, we speculated that increased expression of OsLHT1 enhances the external uptake of proline by roots in response to various stresses. In addition, we predicted the miRNAs that can interact with OsLHT1 using PmiREN (https://pmiren.com/) (accessed on 9 November 2022) and found that OsLHT1 may be the target gene of miR396 (Figure S7). miR396 has also been reported to regulate growth, development and abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [36]. Therefore, OsLHT1 may also potentially respond to adversity by interacting with miR396. OsLHT3, because it is specifically expressed in reproductive organs, transports more amino acids to developing reproductive organs through increased expression in response to stress. Previous studies have revealed that over-expression of the GABA transporter PeuGAT3 enhances abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis [37]. GABA acts as an endogenous signaling molecule to regulate plant stress responses [38]. Although OsLHT6 cannot transport proline, it may transport other stress-induced compounds (e.g., GABA) in response to stress. On the contrary, OsLHT4 was downregulated in roots and shoots in response to the PEG and NaCl treatments (Figure 9 and Figure S5), while OsLHT5 was downregulated in shoots in response to the PEG and NaCl treatments (Figure 9 and Figure S5). This suggested that OsLHT4 and OsLHT5 may be negative regulators of abiotic stress. Thus, it is possible that these OsLHT genes respond to abiotic stress and are key genes involved in stress resistance in rice. The newly discovered data generated in this study may provide a foundation for the further functional characterization of OsLHT genes.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of LHT Genes in Rice

In this study, we performed name searches with keywords (e.g., Lysine/Histidine transporter) to obtain annotated candidates of AtLHT and OsLHT family members in the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, http://www.arabidopsis.org/) (accessed on 25 June 2022) and RAP-DB (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/) (accessed on 20 June 2022), respectively. As 10 AtLHT (AtLHT1–10) and 6 OsLHT (OsLHT1-6) transporters have been previously identified, we used the gene nomenclature for Arabidopsis LHTs proposed by Rentsch et al. [4] and that for rice LHTs proposed by Zhao et al. [5]. LHT sequences were selected from Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Medicago truncatula, Solanum lycopersicum and Sorghum bicolor protein sequences via BLAST searches for Arabidopsis LHTs on the Phytozome v13.1 website (http://www.phytozome.net/) (accessed on 30 June 2022). Information on rice LHT genes, including open reading frame (ORF) lengths, locations and numbers of amino acids were obtained from RAP-DB. The physicochemical parameters of each OsLHT protein were found using ExPASy (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) (accessed on 20 August 2022). The subcellular localization of the OsLHT proteins was predicted using WoLF PSORT (http://wolfpsort.org) (accessed on 9 September 2022) with the amino acid sequences.

4.2. Chromosomal Localization and Gene Duplication

According to their positional data found in the Rice Genome Annotation Project (RGAP) database (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/index.shtml) (accessed on 10 October 2022), the OsLHT gene chromosomal distributions were determined using MapInspect software. The OsLHT genes were created by segmental duplicating events if they were located on duplicated chromosomal blocks that were available at MSU-RGA with the maximum length distance permitted between collinear gene pairs of 500 kb. When genes in a 100 kb region were separated by five or fewer genes, tandem duplicates were identified.

4.3. Phylogenetic Tree Analysis

To investigate the evolutionary relationships between LHT genes in various plant species, the LHT protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Physcomitrella patens, Selaginella moellendorffii, Medicago truncatula, Solanum lycopersicum and Sorghum bicolor were used to construct an unrooted phylogenetic tree. Multiple-sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X (1.83) software, and the tree was constructed according to the maximum-likelihood (ML) method with the p-distance substitution model in MEGA X software. We used 1000 replicates in a bootstrap analysis to determine a support value for each branch.

4.4. Gene Structures, Conserved Motifs and Three-Dimensional Modeling

The Gene Structures Display Server2.0 (GSDS2.0) (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) (accessed on 15 October 2022) was used to examine gene structures (exons/introns). Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation (MEME) (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/cgibin/meme.cgi) (accessed on 17 October 2022) was used to analyze the conserved motifs of LHT proteins. Motif widths were defined between 6 and 200 residues, and the maximum motif number was determined to be 10. The information on OsLHT protein secondary structures was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB, https://www.rcsb.org/) (accessed on 17 October 2022). The putative transmembrane (TM) regions of OsLHT proteins were predicted using the DeepTMHMM Server (https://dtu.biolib.com/DeepTMHMM) (accessed on 20 October 2022) with default settings. Multiple-sequence alignment was carried out using Clustal X (version 1.83) and performed with ESPript 3.0 [39]. The conserved motifs and TM regions were highlighted on the multiple-sequence alignment. In addition, to further verify the TM regions of the OsLHT proteins, the amino acid sequences were submitted to the SwissModel server (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/) (accessed on 25 October 2022) to predict the three-dimensional structures.

4.5. Functional Characterization of OsLHT Using the 22Δ10a Yeast Strain

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant 22Δ10a (MATα gap1-1 put4-1 uga4-1 can1::HisG lyp1alp1::HisG hip1::HisG dip5::HisG gnp1Δ agp1Δ ura3-1) was used for functional characterization of OsLHTs [26]. The coding sequences of OsLHTs were amplified by PCR and cloned into the pDR195 yeast expression vectors. The six constructed vectors were transformed into the 22Δ10a strain and the wild-type (WT) yeast strain 23344c (MATα, ura3) using the PEG/LiAc method. At the same time, the empty vector pDR195 was transformed into the WT yeast strain 23344c (MATα, ura3) and the mutant strain 22Δ10a strain as positive and negative controls. For the yeast complementation experiment, transformed yeast was grown on solid selective medium at 30 °C for 3 d, then yeast clones were resuspended overnight in a selective medium to OD = 1, washed twice with water and 10-fold serially diluted with water. Drops of 7 μL of each dilution were dropped onto solid YNB minimal medium without (NH4)2SO4, supplemented with 3 mM of different amino acids as the sole nitrogen source and 2% D-glucose as the C source. Observations were made after 7 d incubation at 30 °C and photographs were taken.

4.6. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

In order to investigate the spatiotemporal expression patterns of the OsLHT genes, rice (Zhonghua 11) seedlings were grown under normal conditions during natural growing seasons (March to July) to investigate the spatiotemporal expression patterns of OsLHT genes. Two-week-old ZH11 seedlings were subjected to the following treatments for gene expression analysis: salinity (150 mM NaCl), cold (4 °C) and PEG (20% PEG6000). ABA (50 M) and MeJA (50 M) were introduced in the study on gene expression in response to the hormones. After treatment, samples of roots and shoots were taken at 0, 0.5, 2, 6 and 24 h. These samples were then promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at −80 °C. For the analysis of gene expression with amino acid treatment, one-week-old ZH11 seedlings were starved of nitrogen for 24 h and then supplied with ammonium nitrate or various amino acids as the sole N source for 24 h. All roots were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C.

4.7. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from various rice samples in the different treatments based on the instructions from the manufacturer of RNAiso Plus (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan, code no. 9108). M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA, cat. no. M1701) was used for reverse transcription, with 2 μg of total RNA to cDNA. qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan, RR820A), using a Roche Light Cycler 480 Real-Time PCR system. eEF-1a (LOC_Os03g08020) was used as an internal control. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to determine the relative expression levels of genes. This experiment was performed in triplicate. All primers used are listed in Table S1.

4.8. Subcellular Localization Assays

The open reading frames of OsLHTs without stop codons were inserted into pGL–GFP vectors, resulting in constructs containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused at the C–terminus of the proteins. The constructs were transferred into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts using PEG–mediated transformation [40]. Protoplasts harboring the empty pGL–GFP vector (35S:GFP) were used as a control. The protoplasts were incubated at 22 °C for 12–18 h in the dark, and the subcellular distribution of the GFP fusion protein was examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope. Excitation was achieved using an argon laser at 488 nm (GFP), and the emission of GFP was detected from 492 to 550 nm. The auto-fluorescence of chlorophyll was simultaneously detected between 650 and 730 nm.

4.9. Analysis of Cis-Elements in OsLHT Promoter Regions

The upstream sequences of the OsLHT genes were extracted using NCBI. The obtained sequences were further delivered to the PlantCARE database for predicting and analyzing the cis-elements [41].

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants12040817/s1, Figure S1: Chromosomal distribution of LHT genes in rice. Six OsLHT genes were mapped to 4 of the 12 rice chromosomes. Chromosome numbers are located at the bottom of each vertical bar. Figure S2: Motif distribution in LHT proteins of rice and the conserved amino acid sequences. Motifs of the OsLHT proteins were identified by the online MEME program. Figure S3: The expression of OsLHTs under different amino acid treatments. Figure S4: Expression patterns of six OsLHT genes in various tissues, as revealed by qRT-PCR. Figure S5: Expression patterns of six OsLHT genes under PEG, Cold and NaCl stress, as revealed by qRT-PCR. Figure S6: Expression patterns of six OsLHT genes under MeJA and ABA stress, as revealed by qRT-PCR. Figure S7: The degradome evidence of interaction between OsLHT1 and miR396 from PmiREN. Table S1: All primers used in this study. Table S2: The detailed functional annotations of cis-elements in the promoter regions of OsLHTs.

Author Contributions

C.T. and T.F. designed the research. T.F., C.W., W.Y. and T.L. performed the experiments. T.F., C.T. and Y.Z. analyzed the data. T.F. and C.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2020A1515011423).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Guillaume Pilot of Virginia Tech University for providing the 22Δ10a yeast strain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nasholm, T.; Kielland, K.; Ganeteg, U. Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. New Phytol. 2009, 182, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Frommer, W.B.; Hummel, S.; Riesmeier, J.W. Expression cloning in yeast of a cDNA encoding a broad specificity amino acid permease from Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 5944–5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tegeder, M. Transporters for amino acids in plant cells: Some functions and many unknowns. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rentsch, D.; Schmidt, S.; Tegeder, M. Transporters for uptake and allocation of organic nitrogen compounds in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhao, H.M.; Ma, H.L.; Yu, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, J. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of amino acid transporter gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, L.; Yuan, H.Y.; Ren, R.; Zhao, S.Q.; Han, Y.P.; Zhou, Q.Y.; Ke, D.X.; Wang, Y.X.; Wang, L. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of amino acid transporter gene family in Glycine Max. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, M.; Wu, S.N.; Chen, Z.; Dong, Q.; Yan, H.W.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the amino acid transporter gene family in poplar. Tree Genet. Genomes 2015, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, H.L.; Cao, X.L.; Shi, S.D.; Li, S.L.; Gao, J.P.; Ma, Y.L.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, Q. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis of the amino acid transporter superfamily in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 107, 164–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wan, Y.F.; King, R.; Mitchell, R.A.C.; Hassani-Pak, K.; Hawkesford, M.J. Spatiotemporal expression patterns of wheat amino acid transporters reveal their putative roles in nitrogen transport and responses to abiotic stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, G.Z.; Wei, Q.X.; Huang, H.; Xia, J.X. Amino Acid Transporters in Plant Cells: A Brief Review. Plants 2020, 9, 967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dinkeloo, K.; Boyd, S.; Pilot, G. Update on amino acid transporter functions and on possible amino acid sensing mechanisms in plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 74, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pratelli, R.; Pilot, G. Regulation of amino acid metabolic enzymes and transporters in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5535–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Denance, N.; Szurek, B.; Noel, L.D. Emerging functions of nodulin-like proteins in non-nodulating plant species. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ladwig, F.; Stahl, M.; Ludewig, U.; Hirner, A.A.; Hammes, U.Z.; Stadler, R.; Harter, K.; Koch, W. Siliques are Red1 from Arabidopsis acts as a bidirectional amino acid transporter that is crucial for the amino acid homeostasis of siliques. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1643–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Foster, J.; Lee, Y.H.; Tegeder, M. Distinct expression of members of the LHT amino acid transporter family in flowers indicates specific roles in plant reproduction. Sex Plant Reprod. 2008, 21, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hirner, A.; Ladwig, F.; Stransky, H.; Okumoto, S.; Keinath, M.; Harms, A.; Frommer, W.B.; Koch, W. Arabidopsis LHT1 is a high-affinity transporter for cellular amino acid uptake in both root epidermis and leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1931–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, G.S.; Ji, Y.Y.; Bhuiyan, N.H.; Pilot, G.; Selvaraj, G.; Zou, J.T.; Wei, Y.D. Amino acid homeostasis modulates salicylic acid-associated redox status and defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3845–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.H.; Yang, G.Z.; Shi, M.X.; Hao, D.L.; Wei, Q.X.; Wang, Z.G.; Fu, S.; Su, Y.H.; Xia, J.X. Disruption of an amino acid transporter LHT1 leads to growth inhibition and low yields in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, N.; Gu, M.J.; Hu, J.Q.; Qu, H.Y.; Xu, G.H. Rice OsLHT1 functions in leaf-to-panicle nitrogen allocation for grain yield and quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, N.; Hu, J.Q.; Yan, M.; Qu, H.Y.; Luo, L.; Tegeder, M.; Xu, G.H. Oryza sativa Lysine-Histidine-type Transporter 1 functions in root uptake and root-to-shoot allocation of amino acids in rice. Plant J. 2020, 103, 395–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shin, K.; Lee, S.; Song, W.Y.; Lee, R.A.; Lee, I.; Ha, K.; Koo, J.C.; Park, S.K.; Nam, H.G.; Lee, Y.; et al. Genetic identification of ACC-RESISTANT2 reveals involvement of LYSINE HISTIDINE TRANSPORTER1 in the uptake of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015, 56, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, J.; Eom, S.; Shin, K.; Lee, R.A.; Choi, S.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.; Soh, M.S. Identification of lysine histidine transporter 2 as an 1-Aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana by transgenic complementation approach. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jiang, X.Y.; Xie, Y.; Ren, Z.F.; Ganeteg, U.; Lin, F.; Zhao, C.; Xu, H.H. Design of a new glutamine-fipronil conjugate with alpha-amino acid function and Its uptake by A-thaliana lysine histidine transporter 1 (AtLHT1). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 7597–7605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chen, Y.; Yan, Y.; Ren, Z.F.; Ganeteg, U.; Yao, G.K.; Li, Z.L.; Huang, T.; Li, J.H.; Tian, Y.Q.; Lin, F.; et al. AtLHT1 Transporter Can Facilitate the Uptake and Translocation of a Glycinergic-Chlorantraniliprole Conjugate in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 12527–12535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perchlik, M.; Foster, J.; Tegeder, M. Different and overlapping functions of Arabidopsis LHT6 and AAP1 transporters in root amino acid uptake. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5193–5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Besnard, J.; Pratelli, R.; Zhao, C.; Sonawala, U.; Collakova, E.; Pilot, G.; Okumoto, S. UMAMIT14 is an amino acid exporter involved in phloem unloading in Arabidopsis roots. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6385–6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zheng, J.; Men, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Han, Y.; Hou, S.; Sun, Z. Amino acid transporter (AAT) gene family in Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum L. Gaertn.): Characterization, expression analysis and functional prediction. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 217, 330–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, Y.H.; Tegeder, M. Selective expression of a novel high-affinity transport system for acidic and neutral amino acids in the tapetum cells of Arabidopsis flowers. Plant J. 2004, 40, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tegeder, M.; Rentsch, D. Uptake and partitioning of amino acids and peptides. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bock, K.W.; Honys, D.; Ward, J.M.; Padmanaban, S.; Nawrocki, E.P.; Hirschi, K.D.; Twell, D.; Sze, H. Integrating membrane transport with male gametophyte development and function through transcriptomics. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 1151–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, L.; Ortiz-Lopez, A.; Jung, A.; Bush, D.R. ANT1, an aromatic and neutral amino acid transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 1813–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schwacke, R.; Grallath, S.; Breitkreuz, K.E.; Stransky, E.; Stransky, H.; Frommer, W.B.; Rentsch, D. LeProT1, a transporter for proline, glycine betaine, and gamma-amino butyric acid in tomato pollen. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 377–392. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Grallath, S.; Weimar, T.; Meyer, A.; Gumy, C.; Suter-Grotemeyer, M.; Neuhaus, J.M.; Rentsch, D. The AtProT family. Compatible solute transporters with similar substrate specificity but differential expression patterns. Plant Physiol. 2005, 137, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ren, Z.; Chen, Z.; Luo, X.; Su, J.; Yao, G.; Xu, H.; Lin, F. Overexpression of AtAAP1 increased the uptake of an alanine-chlorantraniliprole conjugate in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 36680–36687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Verslues, P.E.; Sharp, R.E. Proline accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots at low water potentials. II. Metabolic source of increased proline deposition in the elongation zone. Plant Physiol. 1999, 119, 1349–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Omidbakhshfard, M.A.; Proost, S.; Fujikura, U.; Mueller-Roeber, B. Growth-Regulating Factors (GRFs): A small transcription factor family with important functions in plant biology. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 998–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, X.T.; Xu, J.M.; Shao, X.M.; Luo, W.C.; Niu, Z.M.; Gao, C.Y.; Wan, D.S. A novel gene coding γ-aminobutyric acid transporter may improve the tolerance of populus euphratica to adverse environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 11, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramesh, S.A.; Tyerman, S.D.; Gilliham, M.; Xu, B. gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) signalling in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 1577–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Robert, X.; Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, W320–W324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yoo, S.D.; Cho, Y.H.; Sheen, J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: A versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lescot, M.; Déhais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouzé, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 12 00817 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship analysis of LHT proteins from Solanum lycopersicum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Physcomitrella patens, Oryza sativa, Selaginella moellendorffii, Medicago truncatula and Sorghum bicolor. Multiple-protein-sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X (1.83) software, and the tree was constructed according to the maximum-likelihood (ML) method with the p-distance substitution model using MEGA X software. We used 1000 replicates in the bootstrap analysis to determine the support value for each branch. The clusters are numbered. 1 Phytozome gene identifier of Selaginella moellendorffii.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship analysis of LHT proteins from Solanum lycopersicum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Physcomitrella patens, Oryza sativa, Selaginella moellendorffii, Medicago truncatula and Sorghum bicolor. Multiple-protein-sequence alignment was performed using Clustal X (1.83) software, and the tree was constructed according to the maximum-likelihood (ML) method with the p-distance substitution model using MEGA X software. We used 1000 replicates in the bootstrap analysis to determine the support value for each branch. The clusters are numbered. 1 Phytozome gene identifier of Selaginella moellendorffii.
Plants 12 00817 g001
Plants 12 00817 g002 550
Figure 2. Exon-intron organization and phylogenetic analysis of OsLHT genes. The unrooted phylogenetic tree construction of the six rice LHT proteins was performed according to the neighbor-joining method in MEGA X software. Red boxes and black lines, respectively, stand for exons and introns. Blue boxes represent untranslated regions (UTRs). The scale at the bottom of the figure can be used to estimate the size of each OsLHT gene.
Figure 2. Exon-intron organization and phylogenetic analysis of OsLHT genes. The unrooted phylogenetic tree construction of the six rice LHT proteins was performed according to the neighbor-joining method in MEGA X software. Red boxes and black lines, respectively, stand for exons and introns. Blue boxes represent untranslated regions (UTRs). The scale at the bottom of the figure can be used to estimate the size of each OsLHT gene.
Plants 12 00817 g002
Plants 12 00817 g003 550
Figure 3. The multiple-sequence alignments for OsLHT proteins in rice. The secondary structures, conserved motifs and TM regions are marked by symbols, boxes and lines, respectively.
Figure 3. The multiple-sequence alignments for OsLHT proteins in rice. The secondary structures, conserved motifs and TM regions are marked by symbols, boxes and lines, respectively.
Plants 12 00817 g003
Plants 12 00817 g004 550
Figure 4. Three-dimensional modeling of OsLHT proteins. Side view (left) and top view (right) of the model created using SwissModel. The partial a-helix in the extracellular portion between the fifth transmembrane region and the sixth transmembrane region is marked by a circle.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional modeling of OsLHT proteins. Side view (left) and top view (right) of the model created using SwissModel. The partial a-helix in the extracellular portion between the fifth transmembrane region and the sixth transmembrane region is marked by a circle.
Plants 12 00817 g004
Plants 12 00817 g005 550
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of OsLHTs in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Abbreviations: GFP, GFP fluorescence image; Chlorophyll, chlorophyll autofluorescence; Bright, bright-field image; Merged, merged bright-field, GFP fluorescence and chloroplast fluorescence images. Free GFP was used as a positive control. Bars = 5 μm.
Figure 5. Subcellular localization of OsLHTs in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Abbreviations: GFP, GFP fluorescence image; Chlorophyll, chlorophyll autofluorescence; Bright, bright-field image; Merged, merged bright-field, GFP fluorescence and chloroplast fluorescence images. Free GFP was used as a positive control. Bars = 5 μm.
Plants 12 00817 g005
Plants 12 00817 g006 550
Figure 6. Yeast function complementation experiment. The amino acids acted as the only nitrogen source in the media. The pDR195−OsLHTs and the empty vector pDR195 were transformed into the wide-type strain 23344c and the mutant strain 22Δ10α, respectively. Yeast clones were cultured overnight in a selective medium to OD = 1, then diluted to OD = 0.1, 0.01 and 0.001. Drops of 7 μL were aligned on minimal media with the amino acids as the sole nitrogen source. Images were taken after 7 days of growth at 30 °C.
Figure 6. Yeast function complementation experiment. The amino acids acted as the only nitrogen source in the media. The pDR195−OsLHTs and the empty vector pDR195 were transformed into the wide-type strain 23344c and the mutant strain 22Δ10α, respectively. Yeast clones were cultured overnight in a selective medium to OD = 1, then diluted to OD = 0.1, 0.01 and 0.001. Drops of 7 μL were aligned on minimal media with the amino acids as the sole nitrogen source. Images were taken after 7 days of growth at 30 °C.
Plants 12 00817 g006
Plants 12 00817 g007 550
Figure 7. Cis-acting elements identified in the promoter regions of the six OsLHT genes in rice. (A) Information on species and localizations. (B) Information on quantities.
Figure 7. Cis-acting elements identified in the promoter regions of the six OsLHT genes in rice. (A) Information on species and localizations. (B) Information on quantities.
Plants 12 00817 g007
Plants 12 00817 g008 550
Figure 8. Heat map of the quantitative real-time PCR analysis results for the OsLHT genes at various developmental stages and in various organs, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values. Abbreviations: 4L−R, roots of 4−leaf stage seedlings; 4L−S, 4−leaf stage seedlings; 2L−R, roots of 2−leaf stage seedlings; 2L−S, 2−leaf stage seedlings; 10L−SA, shoot apex of 10−leaf stage seedling; BP, booting panicle; ≤1P, developing panicle with a length of ≤1 cm.
Figure 8. Heat map of the quantitative real-time PCR analysis results for the OsLHT genes at various developmental stages and in various organs, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values. Abbreviations: 4L−R, roots of 4−leaf stage seedlings; 4L−S, 4−leaf stage seedlings; 2L−R, roots of 2−leaf stage seedlings; 2L−S, 2−leaf stage seedlings; 10L−SA, shoot apex of 10−leaf stage seedling; BP, booting panicle; ≤1P, developing panicle with a length of ≤1 cm.
Plants 12 00817 g008
Plants 12 00817 g009 550
Figure 9. Heat map of the quantitative real−time PCR analysis results of the OsLHT genes in roots and shoots under cold, NaCl and PEG treatments, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values.
Figure 9. Heat map of the quantitative real−time PCR analysis results of the OsLHT genes in roots and shoots under cold, NaCl and PEG treatments, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values.
Plants 12 00817 g009
Plants 12 00817 g010 550
Figure 10. Heat map of the quantitative real−time PCR analysis results of the OsLHT genes in roots and shoots under MeJA and ABA treatments, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values.
Figure 10. Heat map of the quantitative real−time PCR analysis results of the OsLHT genes in roots and shoots under MeJA and ABA treatments, with three biological and technical replicates. The scale above displays the relative signal intensity values.
Plants 12 00817 g010
Table
Table 1. Six identified members of the LHT gene family in rice.
Table 1. Six identified members of the LHT gene family in rice.
Locus IDGene NameChr aORF Length (bp)Number of
Amino Acids		Molecular
Weight (Mw/
Da)		Theoretical pIFL-cDNAcWoLF PSORT
LOC_Os08g03350OsLHT18134444749,830.959.20AK102015PM
LOC_Os12g14100OsLHT212134144648,941.598.87AK070297plas: 9.5, cyto_plas: 5.5, E.R.: 2, golg: 2
LOC_Os05g14820OsLHT35137145649,939.829.13EU956703plas: 12, golg: 2
LOC_Os04g38860OsLHT44133544447,795.999.09AK243224plas: 8, vacu: 3, cyto: 1, E.R.: 1
LOC_Os04g47420OsLHT54153951255,030.869.13AK060598chlo: 12.5, chlo_mito: 7.5
LOC_Os12g30040OsLHT6121527 50854,950.299.06AK100852plas: 6, chlo: 3, cyto: 2, nucl: 1, mito: 1
a The chromosome on which the gene is located.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fan, T.; Wu, C.; Yang, W.; Lv, T.; Zhou, Y.; Tian, C. The LHT Gene Family in Rice: Molecular Characterization, Transport Functions and Expression Analysis. Plants 2023, 12, 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040817

AMA Style

Fan T, Wu C, Yang W, Lv T, Zhou Y, Tian C. The LHT Gene Family in Rice: Molecular Characterization, Transport Functions and Expression Analysis. Plants. 2023; 12(4):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fan, Tian, Chunting Wu, Weiqi Yang, Tianxiao Lv, Yuping Zhou, and Changen Tian. 2023. "The LHT Gene Family in Rice: Molecular Characterization, Transport Functions and Expression Analysis" Plants 12, no. 4: 817. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop