Next Article in Journal
Combined Pulsed Electric Field and Microwave-Assisted Extraction as a Green Method for the Recovery of Antioxidant Compounds with Electroactive Potential from Coffee Agro-Waste
Next Article in Special Issue
Evolution of Physicochemical Properties and Phenolic Maturity of Vilana, Vidiano, Kotsifali and Mandilari Wine Grape Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) during Ripening
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Serpentine Soil on the Early Development of a Non-Serpentine African Thistle, Berkheya radula (Harv.) De Wild
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Volatile Organic Compounds of Two Table Grapes (cv. Italia and Bronx Seedless) along Ripening in Vines Established in the Aegean Region (Turkey)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 18
10.3390/plants11182361
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Leaf Removal at Véraison and Foliar K+ Application to Beibinghong Vines Improved Berry Quality under Cold-Climate Conditions

by
Zhao Le
1,†,
Wei Zheng
1,†,
Mengde Dong
1,
Ming Cai
2,
Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboa
3,* and
Baoshan Sun
1,*
1
Faculty of Functional Food and Wine, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
2
Service Centre for Important Industry Development of Huanren Manchu Autonomous County, Benxi 117201, China
3
Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Tecnología, Universidad Mayor, Temuco 4780000, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Plants 2022, 11(18), 2361; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182361
Submission received: 16 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 9 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Viticultural Practices and Edaphoclimatic Conditions on Grape and Wine Quality)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Beibinghong is a grapevine variety that is well distributed in Northeastern China due to its adaptation to extreme cold conditions and vine diseases. Nonetheless, Beibinghong wines are extremely acidic and rich in phenolic compounds. The aim of this research was to study the effects of leaf removal at véraison and foliar K+ applications on Beibinghong vines to reduce the acidity and increase their polyphenol content. (2) Methods: Beibinghong berries were harvested when they reached close to 20 °Brix, and the physicochemical parameters were determined. (3) Results: Leaf removal at véraison plus K+ foliar applications to Beibinghong vines decreased the titratable acidity and increased the total phenolic and phenolic acid contents compared with the control. Moreover, the titratable acidity in the Beibinghong berries was negatively related to their total contents of phenols, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins. (4) Conclusions: Leaf removal at véraison performed with foliar K+ applications to vines could be an interesting alternative for Beibinghong production under cold-climate viticulture because it allows for a decrease in the acidity and an increase in the phenolic content of the berries, without incurring the risk of sunburn.

1. Introduction

Beibinghong is an interspecific hybrid variety from Zuoyouhong × Zuojia 84-26-53. It holds mostly genes from Vitis amurensis, and to a lesser extent V. vinifera, in its pedigree, and it is used to produce red ice wines [1]. V. amurensis is a perennial wild grapevine species that originated in East Asia and is mainly distributed in Korea, Japan, and China, and in this last country, in the Yellow River and Songhua River basins [2,3]. Northeastern China has extremely cold winters, and V. vinifera L. vines cannot survive under these conditions, even if they are protected from the cold by burying. V. amurensis is one of the most cold-resistant species in the Vitis genus, the branches and roots of which are capable of surviving at −40 and −16 °C, respectively, which gives it the ability to adapt to the cold conditions of Northeastern China [4]. In addition, this Vitis species is also highly resistant to different vine diseases, such as white rot, grape black pox, grapevine anthracnose, grape bitter rot, and downy mildew [1,4].
Beibinghong wines are rich in a wide range of secondary metabolites, and mainly polyphenols [1,5], but they are extremely acidic [1,2,5,6,7,8] because the grapes do not reach the optimal technological maturity. This has led winemakers to produce sweet red wines by adding sugar, which is hardly acceptable to most consumers. Most of the research performed to decrease the acidity in Beibinghong wines has been developed from the winemaking point of view, and scarce studies have been reported in viticulture [9]. Source–sink relationships alter the development and quality of the berries, in which source organs transport assimilates to other vegetal structures for the nutritional and reproductive vine development. Studies have shown that, in a single-canopy trellis system, values from 6 to 12 cm2 g−1 are necessary to obtain fruit with an optimum harvest maturity [10,11]. Despite this, viticulturists should also consider the species, variety, leaf area per vine or m2, vine level of carbon and balance translocation, leaf photosynthetic activity, carbohydrate reserves, among other variables, to reach an optimal ripeness [12,13,14]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no available information that addresses the leaf-to-fruit ratios necessary to reach the optimal technological maturity in V. amurensis varieties.
Leaf removal is a practice that is usually performed in viticulture at flowering, fruit set, or véraison to enhance the berry quality. Leaf removal at fruit set significantly reduced the malic acid content and enhanced the color intensity of Grenache wines [15], whereas leaf removal to cold-climate interspecific hybrid grapes at véraison reduced the titratable acidity, and particularly the malic acid concentration [16]. Post-véraison defoliation may decrease the berry total soluble solids at harvest and wine alcoholic content [17]. The leaf-removal effectiveness is also affected by the degree of defoliation. Cataldo et al. [18] showed that leaf removal to eight leaves at fruit set led to a slow berry ripeness, whereas the remotion of four leaves at the same phenological stage increased the sugar and anthocyanin contents in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes. Leaf removal in different positions not only improves the berry microclimate, increasing the total phenols, tartaric acid esters, anthocyanins, and flavanols in the berry skin, but also enhances bunch ventilation, reducing the grapevine-disease pressure [19].
Potassium ion (K+) is the most abundant cation found in grape berries, and it plays a key role in enzymatic activation and assimilate transport, controlling plant–water relationships [20,21]. Studies have shown that berries have high requirements for K+ upon ripening, and K additions to the soil results in more color and ripening [22]. However, the leaf ontogeny from the canopy and alterations to the source–sink balance may influence the K+ deficiency of grape berries.
Grape acidity results from the ratio between the free organic acids, such as malic and tartaric acids, and organic acids neutralized by K+ [23]. At the same, K+ is involved in the conversion and transport of sugars to the berries through the phloem, improving their sugar-to-acid ratio. Delgado et al. [24] showed that supplying K+ to vines increased the color and polyphenol content of berries by the stimulation of vine photosynthesis. Some studies have shown that the K+ content in vine leaf petioles were more correlated with the K+ content and pH in the juice than in other parts of the plant [25,26]. In addition, K+ absorption after soil fertilization may be affected by its interaction with other minerals in the soil [21,23], and vine roots lose their activity in the post-véraison stages. Under these conditions, foliar K+ applications to vines could be an interesting option to decrease the acidity in Beibinghong grape berries.
To the best of our knowledge, there are no published reports that evaluate the leaf removal of and/or foliar applications to Beibinghong grapevine varieties. Therefore, the goal of this research was to evaluate the effects of leaf removal at véraison and foliar K+ applications to Beibinghong vines to reduce the acidity and increase their polyphenol content in the grape berries in a preliminary study.

2. Results

2.1. Berry Weight, Physicochemical Parameters, and Phenolic Content

Table 1 shows the effect of leaf removal at véraison, the foliar potassium (K+) application, and their combination, to Beibinghong vines on the weight, physicochemical parameters, and phenolic compounds of the berries. The results showed that leaf removal at véraison induced a higher berry weight than the leaf removal plus K+ foliar application, whereas this treatment induced lower titratable acidity and higher contents of total phenols and total phenolic acids than the control. Individually, leaf removal and K+ foliar application treatments to vines also induced a higher total phenolic acid content in the berries than the control. The pH, total soluble solids, total proanthocyanidins, total flavonoids, and total anthocyanins were not affected by the treatments.

2.2. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

To classify the different samples, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the berry parameter data from the control and treated Beibinghong vines with different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) K+ foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal plus K+ foliar application, as well as the control (Figure 1). PC1 and PC2 explained 70.6 and 25.1% of the total variance, respectively, representing 95.7% of all the variance. PC1 was strongly correlated (r2 > 0.9) to the pH (−), titratable acidity (+), total phenols (−), total phenolic acids (−), total proanthocyanidins (−), and total anthocyanins (−), whereas PC2 was strongly correlated to the berry weight (−) and total soluble solids (+). Leaf removal plus K+ foliar application was located at the opposite side of the control on PC1, whereas the leaf removal and K+ foliar application treatments were placed in the middle side on PC1.

2.3. Correlation Matrix

Table 2 shows the matrix of the correlations between nine berry parameters of Beibinghong vines subjected to different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) K+ foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal plus K+ foliar application, as well as the control. The titratable acidity had negative and significant correlations with the total phenols (−0.98; p-value < 0.05), total proanthocyanidins (−0.96; p-value < 0.05), and total anthocyanins (−0.98; p-value < 0.01), indicating that the berries with high titratable acidity presented low contents of total phenols, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins. The total phenols had positive and significant correlations with the total proanthocyanidins (0.95; p-value < 0.05) and total anthocyanins (0.97; p-value < 0.05), indicating that the berries with high total phenol content also contained high contents of total proanthocyanidins and anthocyanins. The total proanthocyanidins had a positive and significant correlation with the total anthocyanins (0.98; p-value < 0.05), indicating that the berries with high contents of proanthocyanidins also presented high contents of anthocyanin.

3. Discussion

These results are the first to expose the effects of viticultural practices on Vitis amurensis varieties, and to provide certain interesting relationships among the berry morpho-physicochemical parameters on the Beibinghong variety. The results showed that potassium (K+) foliar applications to vines induced higher berry weights compared with leaf removal plus K+ application treatment, but not when it was compared with the control (Table 1). Some authors reported that K+ foliar applications to vines increased the chlorophyll content and promoted an increase in the photosynthetic products, leading to an increase in the berry weight [22,27]. However, leaf removal involves removing leaves from the basal portion of the shoots, reducing the leaf photosynthetic area, and increasing the berry sunlight exposure and air circulation [28], which could induce a decrease in the berry weight.
Based on the results, leaf removal plus K+ applications to the vines induced lower titratable acidity in the berries than the control (Table 1). Berries exposed to sun after leaf removal at véraison may increase their temperature, which results in the degradation of organic acids, and mainly malic acid. Sweetman et al. [29] reported that heating berries at the véraison and ripening stages reduced the malate content, which is consistent with the effects typically seen in warm vintages. K+ applications to vines at the post-véraison stage induced a high K+ mobility towards developing organs, causing the K+ to move from the mature leaves to the berries, which, in turn, increases the K+ concentration in the vacuole, generating K+ hydrogen tartrate, which leads to a reduction in the acidity [30]. Similar results were reported by Riesterer-Loper et al. [16], who showed that leaf removal performed at two weeks after fruit set in cold-climate interspecific hybrids increased the irradiance and temperature of the berries, reducing their titratable acidity, and particularly the malic acid content. The total phenolic and phenolic acid contents were also increased after the application of the combination of leaf removal plus K+ foliar applications to the vines (Table 1). Leaf removal before véraison may increase the light exposure and berry temperature, which are important factors that improve the fruit composition, color development, and phenolic compounds in the berries. Previous research trials have suggested that an increase in photosynthesis occurs when leaves are removed, and this may compensate for the reduced leaf area [31,32]. Moreover, foliar K+ applications to vines not only facilitate the vine growth, but also the sap flow through the phloem and xylem [20], probably improving the phenolic accumulation in the whole grape berry. Contrary to this, there were no statistical differences for the total proanthocyanidins, total flavonoids, and total anthocyanins among the treatments. Based on this, it is possible that, under cold conditions, viticultural practices such as leaf removal plus K+ foliar applications performed together in the vineyard could be a good strategy to decrease the high-acidity characteristic of Beibinghong berries, also improving their phenolic content.
A matrix of correlations showed that the titratable acidity in Beibinghong was negatively related to the total contents of phenols, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins in the berries (Table 2). In contrast, soluble solids are usually related to the anthocyanin content in most of the V. vinifera grapevine varieties [33]. Based on this, it is possible to suggest that the phenolic maturity is inversely related to the titratable acidity in Beibinghong grapes. Nevertheless, at the same level of technical maturity or soluble solids, a lower concentration of titratable acidity might be a good indicator of the phenolic maturity in this variety. Therefore, it is possible that, for these reasons, the viticultural practices only affected the acid profile and not the soluble solids content in the Beibinghong berries. With respect to the phenolic compounds, anthocyanins show pH-dependent structural isoforms in acidic and neutral solutions, but they degrade in alkaline conditions [34,35]. In the acidic vacuole, the color of anthocyanins shifts from red to blue as the pH increases [34]. In addition, it has been suggested that protocatechuic acid could be an anthocyanin-degradation product [34].
Growers in warmer locations limit leaf removal on one side of the vine canopy due to the risk of sunburn. Under Northern Chinese conditions, which are cool and sunny conditions, the partial defoliating on the cooler side may be considered to improve the berry quality. However, the risk of sunburn is high in most of the Mediterranean viticultural zones, but it is less of a concern for many regions in Northern China, where cold and overcast conditions are common. Because of the overcast conditions, the air and berry temperatures do not usually reach high enough levels of radiation for a sufficient amount of time to cause heat damage.

4. Conclusions

Leaf removal at véraison performed with potassium (K+) foliar applications to Beibinghong vines induced lower titratable acidity in the berries and higher total phenolic and phenolic acid contents than the control. Based on PCA, the control was placed at the opposite site of the plot compared with the leaf removal plus K+ foliar application treatment. A matrix of correlations showed that the titratable acidity in the Beibinghong was negatively related to the total contents of phenols, proanthocyanidins, and anthocyanins in the berries. Therefore, leaf removal at véraison performed together with foliar K+ applications to Beibinghong vines could be an interesting alternative to decrease the characteristic acidity of their grapes, even improving their phenolic compound content.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Plant Material

The study was conducted in 2021 in a vineyard belonging to Shenyang Pharmaceutical University (South Campus, 41.466° N, 123.710° E, Benxi, Liaoning, China), where a temperate monsoon climate predominates. Information about the climate of the plot is shown in Table 3. Beibinghong vines grafted onto Beta (Vitis labrusca × V. riparia) were planted in 2019, spaced at a distance of 1.0 × 2.5 m in a north–south orientation, formed in bilateral cordon, trained on a vertical-shoot-position trellis system, and spur pruned to two buds.

5.2. Treatments

Twelve replicates by treatment were arranged in a complete randomized block design in the vineyard, considering one healthy vine. Three treatments were performed in the vineyard, as well as the control: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) foliar potassium (K+) application to the vines, and (iii) the combination of leaf removal and K+ application. The control consisted of the application of an aqueous solution, containing only Tween-80, at a dosage of 1.0%. Leaf removal was performed at véraison, removing the basal 3–4 leaves, including the basal lateral shoots (Figure 2). K+ foliar application was performed using a monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) fertilizer with a concentration of 3 g L−1, which was prepared with 1.0% of Tween-80 to improve the wetting area. The K+ solution was applied every 10 days from véraison to harvest, spraying 100 mL on both sides of the trellis, accounting for 200 mL of solution per vine. The K+ was applied to the vines during morning, when the stomata are open, avoiding wind and precipitation. In addition, one cluster was kept on each shoot in all treatments and the control to minimize the differences in the leaf area-to-fruit ratio in the performed analysis.

5.3. Harvest and Berry Determinations

Grapes were monitored to decide their optimum technological maturity to be harvested, considering the content of soluble solids close to 20 °Brix that occurred on 19 September 2021. Grapes from each replicate and treatment were harvested, placed in boxes with ice packs, and were quickly transported to the laboratory of Shenyang Pharmaceutical University. A sampling of 200 berries was taken randomly from each replicate and treatment for the subsequent determination of the berry weight, total soluble solids, pH, and titratable acidity, which were analyzed based on the OIV procedures [36]. The rest of the collected grapes were stored in a freezer at −20 °C for further analyses of the phenolic compounds.

5.4. Determination of Berry Polyphenols

A pretreatment to the frozen grapes was performed, in which 40 g of the frozen berries was weighed, 5 mL of water was added, and they were ground into a homogenous mass. Then, 5 g of the sample was put into a centrifuge tube, and 40 mL of 60% of analytical-grade ethanol was added. The mixture was then subjected to sonication at 50 °C for 60 min for the polyphenol extraction. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged at 3500 r min−1 for 10 min, and the supernatant was taken for the analyses of the polyphenols. The total phenols, total proanthocyanidins, total flavonoids, total phenolic acids, and total anthocyanins were determined. The total phenols were determined by the Folin–Ciocalteau method, as described by Kupe et al. [37]. The total proanthocyanidins were determined by the vanillin–hydrochloric acid method, according to the report published by Mitsunaga et al. [38]. The total flavonoids were determined by the method described by Zhishen et al. [39]. The total phenolic acids were analyzed by the ferric chloride–potassium ferricyanide method, as described by Feduraev et al. [40], whereas the total anthocyanins were determined spectrophotometrically at 520 nm by the method exposed by Iland et al. [41].

5.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statgraphics Centurion XVI.I (Virginia, U.S.A), and all data were subjected to a Shapiro–Wilk normality test, Levene chi-square test, followed by a one-way ANOVA. The significance of the differences was determined by Duncan’s test (p ≤ 0.05). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the relationships among the variables to classify the treatments based on the acquired data, using InfoStat (www.infostat.com.ar) (accessed on 15 August 2022).

Author Contributions

Z.L., W.Z., M.D., M.C. and B.S. designed the study and were responsible for the performance of the research and the collection. Z.L., W.Z., M.D., M.C., G.G.-G. and B.S. interpreted the results, performed the data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Liu, S.Y.; Sun, X.Y.; Fang, Y. Oenological Potential and Health Benefits of Chinese Non-Vitis vinifera Species: An Opportunity to the Revalorization and to Breed New Varieties. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, Q.; Diao, L.; Song, H.; Zhu, X. Vitis Amurensis Rupr: A Review of Chemistry and Pharmacology. Phytomedicine 2018, 49, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Q.-T.; Fan, S.-T.; Song, R.-G.; Lu, W.-P. “Beibinghong”: A New Grape Cultivar for Brewing Ice Red Wine. Vitis 2014, 53, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.; Li, H. Review: Research Progress in Amur Grape, Vitis Amurensis Rupr. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 93, 565–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, L.; Li, X.; Hu, X.; Wu, X.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zang, Y.; Tang, H.; Wang, C.; Xu, J. Quality Characteristics and Anthocyanin Profiles of Different Vitis Amurensis Grape Cultivars and Hybrids from Chinese Germplasm. Molecules 2021, 26, 6696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, J.C.; Li, S.Y.; He, F.; Yuan, Z.Y.; Liu, T.; Reeves, M.J.; Duan, C.Q. Phenolic and Chromatic Properties of Beibinghong Red Ice Wine during and after Vinification. Molecules 2016, 21, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, Y.; Wen, L.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Zheng, F.; Min, W.; Yue, H.; Pan, P. Optimisation of Pulsed Electric Fields Extraction of Anthocyanin from Beibinghong Vitis Amurensis Rupr. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 32, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lan, Y.B.; Qian, X.; Yang, Z.J.; Xiang, X.F.; Yang, W.X.; Liu, T.; Zhu, B.Q.; Pan, Q.H.; Duan, C.Q. Striking Changes in Volatile Profiles at Sub-Zero Temperatures during over-Ripening of ‘Beibinghong’ Grapes in Northeastern China. Food Chem. 2016, 212, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, L.; Nan, L.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Z.; Nan, H.; Li, H. Effects of Two Training Systems on Sugar Metabolism and Related Enzymes in Cv. Beibinghong (Vitis Amurensis Rupr.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 95, 987–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kliewer, W.M.; Dokoozlian, N.K. Leaf Area/Crop Weight Ratios of Grapevines: Influence on Fruit Composition and Wine Quality. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2005, 56, 170–181. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Díaz-Galvéz, I.; Verdugo-Vásquez, N.; Moreno-Simunovic, Y. Leaf-to-Fruit Ratios in Vitis vinifera L. Cv. “Sauvignon Blanc”, “Carmenère”, “Cabernet Sauvignon”, and “Syrah” Growing in Maule Valley (Chile): Influence on Yield and Fruit Composition. Agriculture 2019, 9, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Shahood, R.; Torregrosa, L.; Savoi, S.; Romieu, C. First Quantitative Assessment of Growth, Sugar Accumulation and Malate Breakdown in a Single Ripening Berry. OENO One 2020, 54, 1077–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Antalick, G.; Šuklje, K.; Blackman, J.W.; Schmidtke, L.M.; Deloire, A. Performing Sequential Harvests Based on Berry Sugar Accumulation (Mg/Berry) to Obtain Specific Wine Sensory Profiles. OENO One 2021, 55, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Martínez-Lüscher, J.; Kurtural, S.K. Same Season and Carry-over Effects of Source-Sink Adjustments on Grapevine Yields and Non-Structural Carbohydrates. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tardaguila, J.; Diago, M.P.; Martinez de Toda, F.; Poni, S.; Vilanova, M. Effects of Timing of Leaf Removal on Yield, Berry Maturity, Wine Composition and Sensory Properties of Cv. Grenache Grown under Non Irrigated Conditions. OENO One 2008, 42, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riesterer-Loper, J.; Workmaster, B.A.; Atucha, A. Impact of Fruit Zone Sunlight Exposure on Ripening Profiles of Cold Climate Interspecific Hybrid Winegrapes. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2019, 70, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Caccavello, G.; Giaccone, M.; Scognamiglio, P.; Forlani, M.; Basile, B. Influence of Intensity of Post-Veraison Defoliation or Shoot Trimming on Vine Physiology, Yield Components, Berry and Wine Composition in Aglianico Grapevines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2017, 23, 226–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cataldo, E.; Salvi, L.; Paoli, F.; Fucile, M.; Mattii, G.B. Effects of Defoliation at Fruit Set on Vine Physiology and Berry Composition in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines. Plants 2021, 10, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stefanovic, D.; Nikolic, N.; Kostic, L.; Todic, S.; Nikolic, M. Early Leaf Removal Increases Berry and Wine Phenolics in Cabernet Sauvignon Grown in Eastern Serbia. Agronomy 2021, 11, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rogiers, S.Y.; Keller, M.; Holzapfel, B.P.; Virgona, J.M. Accumulation of Potassium and Calcium by Ripening Berries on Field Vines of Vitis vinifera (L) Cv. Shiraz. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2000, 6, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mpelasoka, B.S.; Schachtman, D.P.; Treeby, M.T.; Thomas, M.R. A Review of Potassium Nutrition in Grapevines with Special Emphasis on Berry Accumulation. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2003, 9, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, C.-X.; Yang, T.-Y.; Luo, J.; Wang, X.-L.; Jiang, A.-L.; Ye, Z.-W. Effects of Different Fertilizers and Application Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Quality of Kyoho Grape. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 2010, 23, 440–443. [Google Scholar]
  23. Villette, J.; Cuéllar, T.; Verdeil, J.L.; Delrot, S.; Gaillard, I. Grapevine Potassium Nutrition and Fruit Quality in the Context of Climate Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Delgado, R.; Martín, P.; del Álamo, M.; González, M.R. Changes in the Phenolic Composition of Grape Berries during Ripening in Relation to Vineyard Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilisation Rates. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Diez-Zamudio, F.; Laytte, R.; Grallert, C.; Ivit, N.N.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G. Viticultural Performance of Hybrids and Vitis vinifera Varieties Established in Annapolis Valley (Nova Scotia). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Diez-Zamudio, F.; Laytte, R.; Grallert, C.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G. Nutritional Status Differentially Affect Yield and Must Composition of Hybrids and V. Vinifera Varieties Established under Cold Climate Conditions. Ciência E Técnica Vitivinícola 2021, 36, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Amiri, M.E.; Fallahi, E. Influence of Mineral Nutrients on Growth, Yield, Berry Quality, and Petiole Mineral Nutrient Concentrations of Table Grape. J. Plant Nutr. 2007, 30, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. O’brien, P.; Collins, C.; de Bei, R. Leaf Removal Applied to a Sprawling Canopy to Regulate Fruit Ripening in Cabernet Sauvignon. Plants 2021, 10, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sweetman, C.; Sadras, V.O.; Hancock, R.D.; Soole, K.L.; Ford, C.M. Metabolic Effects of Elevated Temperature on Organic Acid Degradation in Ripening Vitis vinifera Fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5975–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Poni, S.; Quartieri, M.; Tagliavini, M. Potassium Nutrition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) as Affected by Shoot Trimming. Plant Soil 2003, 253, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Petrie, P.R.; Trought, M.C.T.; Howell, G.S.; Buchan, G.D. The Effect of Leaf Removal and Canopy Height on Whole-Vine Gas Exchange and Fruit Development of Vitis vinifera L. Sauvignon Blanc. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Frioni, T.; Zhuang, S.; Palliotti, A.; Sivilotti, P.; Falchi, R.; Sabbatini, P. Leaf Removal and Cluster Thinning Efficiencies Are Highly Modulated by Environmental Conditions in Cool Climate Viticulture. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2017, 68, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Martínez-Gil, A.M.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Garde-Cerdán, T.; Pérez-Álvarez, E.P.; Moreno-Simunovic, Y. Characterization of Phenolic Composition in Carignan Noir Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) from Six Wine-Growing Sites in Maule Valley, Chile. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Woodward, G.; Kroon, P.; Cassidy, A.; Kay, C. Anthocyanin Stability and Recovery: Implications for the Analysis of Clinical and Experimental Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5271–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Y.; Tikunov, Y.; Schouten, R.E.; Marcelis, L.F.M.; Visser, R.G.F.; Bovy, A. Anthocyanin Biosynthesis and Degradation Mechanisms in Solanaceous Vegetables: A Review. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. OIV. Compendium of International Methods of Analysis of Wines and Musts; OIV: Paris, France, 2003.
  37. Kupe, M.; Karatas, N.; Unal, M.S.; Ercisli, S.; Baron, M.; Sochor, J. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Peel, Pulp and Seed Extracts of Different Clones of the Turkish Grape Cultivar ‘Karaerik’. Plants 2021, 10, 2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mitsunaga, T.; Doi, T.; Kondo, Y.; Abe, I. Color Development of Proanthocyanidins in Vanillin-Hydrochloric Acid Reaction. J. Wood Sci. 1998, 44, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhishen, J.; Mengcheng, T.; Jianming, W. The Determination of Flavonoid Contents in Mulberry and Their Scavenging Effects on Superoxide Radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 555–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Feduraev, P.; Skrypnik, L.; Nebreeva, S.; Dzhobadze, G.; Vatagina, A.; Kalinina, E.; Pungin, A.; Maslennikov, P.; Riabova, A.; Krol, O.; et al. Variability of Phenolic Compound Accumulation and Antioxidant Activity in Wild Plants of Some Rumex Species (Polygonaceae). Antioxidants 2022, 11, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iland, P.G.; Cynkar, W.; Francis, I.L.; Williams, P.J.; Coombe, B.C. Optimisation of Methods for the Determination of Total and Red-Free Glycosyl Glucose in Black Grape Berries of Vitis vinifera. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 1996, 2, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 11 02361 g001 550
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) performed with berry parameters of Beibinghong vines subjected to different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) potassium (K+) foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal plus K+ foliar application, as well as control. °Brix: total soluble solids. Total acidity: titratable acidity.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) performed with berry parameters of Beibinghong vines subjected to different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) potassium (K+) foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal plus K+ foliar application, as well as control. °Brix: total soluble solids. Total acidity: titratable acidity.
Plants 11 02361 g001
Plants 11 02361 g002 550
Figure 2. Beibinghong vines subjected to leaf removal at véraison: (a) compared with untreated vines or (b) the control.
Figure 2. Beibinghong vines subjected to leaf removal at véraison: (a) compared with untreated vines or (b) the control.
Plants 11 02361 g002
Table
Table 1. Effects of leaf removal at véraison, foliar potassium (K+) foliar applications, and their combination (leaf removal plus K+ foliar applications) to vines on weight, physicochemical parameters, and phenolic compounds of Beibinghong berries.
Table 1. Effects of leaf removal at véraison, foliar potassium (K+) foliar applications, and their combination (leaf removal plus K+ foliar applications) to vines on weight, physicochemical parameters, and phenolic compounds of Beibinghong berries.
ControlLeaf RemovalK+ ApplicationLeaf Removal + K+ Application
Berry weight (g)59.36 ± 10.39 ab57.79 ± 5.89 ab63.62 ± 6.84 b55.34 ± 9.01 a
Total soluble solids (°Brix)20.48 ± 1.42 a20.16 ± 0.92 a19.63 ± 0.10 a20.17 ± 1.10 a
pH3.06 ± 0.06 a3.12 ± 0.07 a3.09 ± 0.07 a3.13 ± 0.08 a
Titratable acidity (g L−1) *12.88 ± 0.99 b11.96 ± 1.53 ab11.92 ± 0.99 ab11.28 ± 0.80 a
Total phenols (mg g−1)12.95 ± 2.38 a14.61 ± 3.21 ab14.49 ± 2.38 ab16.39 ± 1.96 b
Total phenolic acids (mg g−1)2.07 ± 0.59 a3.94 ± 1.02 b3.69 ± 0.96 b4.06 ± 0.81 b
Total proanthocyanidins (mg g−1)4.25 ± 1.27 a4.46 ± 1.12 a4.62 ± 1.05 a4.83 ± 0.95 a
Total flavonoids (mg g−1)9.14 ± 1.96 a10.18 ± 2.58 a8.84 ± 1.98 a10.22 ± 1.40 a
Total anthocyanins (mg g−1)1.02 ± 0.27 a1.07 ± 0.29 a1.08 ± 0.25 a1.11 ± 0.20 a
All the parameters are given with their standard error (n = 12). For each parameter, different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (Duncan test: p-value ≤ 0.05). * As gL−1 of tartaric acid.
Table
Table 2. Matrix of the correlations between berry parameters of Beibinghong vines subjected to different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) potassium (K+) foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal + K+ foliar application, as well as the control (above the diagonal).
Table 2. Matrix of the correlations between berry parameters of Beibinghong vines subjected to different treatments: (i) leaf removal at véraison, (ii) potassium (K+) foliar application, and (iii) leaf removal + K+ foliar application, as well as the control (above the diagonal).
Berry Weight°BrixpHTitratable AcidityTotal
Phenols		Total
Phenolic
Acids		Total
Proanthocyanidins		Total
Flavonoids		Total
Anthocyanins
Berry weight1
°Brix−0.641
pH−0.58−0.231
Titratable acidity0.390.46−0.911
Total phenols−0.52−0.300.91−0.98 *1
Total phenolic acids−0.23−0.580.92−0.920.851
Total proanthocyanidins−0.27−0.510.77−0.96 *0.95 *0.821
Total flavonoids−0.900.340.83−0.590.660.570.401
Total anthocyanins−0.29−0.530.86−0.99 **0.97 *0.910.98 *0.491
Data in bold correspond to a significant relationship. In the table, ** and * indicate significance at 1 and 5% of probability, respectively, according to a t-test. Twelve observations underlaying the correlations.
Table
Table 3. Climatic information of the experimental site provided by the Benxi Meteorological Administration during 2021 season.
Table 3. Climatic information of the experimental site provided by the Benxi Meteorological Administration during 2021 season.
2021
Growing Season (from April to September)
Precipitation (mm)1097
ET0 (mm)554
Minimum temperature (°C)−2.7
Average temperature (°C)19.6
Maximum temperature (°C)34.3
Relative humidity (%)0.7
Accumulated radiation (MJ m2)5166.7
Warmest Month (July)
ET0 (mm)114.4
Average radiation (MJ m2)17.74
Annual
Precipitation (mm)1342
ET0 (mm)676.98
Abbreviation: ET0: reference evapotranspiration.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Le, Z.; Zheng, W.; Dong, M.; Cai, M.; Gutiérrez-Gamboa, G.; Sun, B. Leaf Removal at Véraison and Foliar K+ Application to Beibinghong Vines Improved Berry Quality under Cold-Climate Conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182361

AMA Style

Le Z, Zheng W, Dong M, Cai M, Gutiérrez-Gamboa G, Sun B. Leaf Removal at Véraison and Foliar K+ Application to Beibinghong Vines Improved Berry Quality under Cold-Climate Conditions. Plants. 2022; 11(18):2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Le, Zhao, Wei Zheng, Mengde Dong, Ming Cai, Gastón Gutiérrez-Gamboa, and Baoshan Sun. 2022. "Leaf Removal at Véraison and Foliar K+ Application to Beibinghong Vines Improved Berry Quality under Cold-Climate Conditions" Plants 11, no. 18: 2361. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182361

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop