Next Article in Journal
Simulating Urban Growth Using a Random Forest-Cellular Automata (RF-CA) Model
Previous Article in Journal
Manifestation of an Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model on Fire Potential Zonation Mapping in Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal
Open AccessArticle

Analytical Estimation of Map Readability

by 1,*,†, 1,† and 2
1
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sölvegatan 12, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
2
Department of Geography, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Nis, Visegradska 33, 18000 Nis, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Wolfgang Kainz
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4(2), 418-446; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020418
Received: 6 November 2014 / Revised: 4 February 2015 / Accepted: 5 March 2015 / Published: 27 March 2015
Readability is a major issue with all maps. In this study, we evaluated whether we can predict map readability using analytical measures, both single measures and composites of measures. A user test was conducted regarding the perceived readability of a number of test map samples. Evaluations were then performed to determine how well single measures and composites of measures could describe the map readability. The evaluation of single measures showed that the amount of information was most important, followed by the spatial distribution of information. The measures of object complexity and graphical resolution were not useful for explaining the map readability of our test data. The evaluations of composites of measures included three methods: threshold evaluation, multiple linear regression and support vector machine. We found that the use of composites of measures was better for describing map readability than single measures, but we could not identify any major differences in the results of the three composite methods. The results of this study can be used to recommend readability measures for triggering and controlling the map generalization process of online maps. View Full-Text
Keywords: cartography; map readability; usability; user test; supervised learning cartography; map readability; usability; user test; supervised learning
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Harrie, L.; Stigmar, H.; Djordjevic, M. Analytical Estimation of Map Readability. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2015, 4, 418-446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020418

AMA Style

Harrie L, Stigmar H, Djordjevic M. Analytical Estimation of Map Readability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2015; 4(2):418-446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Harrie, Lars; Stigmar, Hanna; Djordjevic, Milan. 2015. "Analytical Estimation of Map Readability" ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 4, no. 2: 418-446. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4020418

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop