Metaverse Acceptance by the Accounting Community as a Premise of Sustainable Behavior
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review: The Relationship between the Metaverse and the Accounting Community
2.1. Metaverse: A Controversial Technology for Improving the Professional Lives of the Accounting Community
2.2. Metaverse: A Point of Contact for the Accounting Community with Virtuality
2.3. The Opportunities and Vulnerabilities of the Metaverse Perceived by the Accounting Community
2.4. The Perceived Utility of the Metaverse by the Accounting Community
2.5. The Gender and Age of the Accountants as Moderators of Activity in the Metaverse
3. Methodology
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brink, W.; Eaton, T.V.; Heitger, D. How Students View the Accounting Profession. Journal of Accountancy. 2023. Available online: https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2023/jun/how-students-view-the-accounting-profession.html (accessed on 10 July 2023).
- Severini, F.; Pretaroli, R.; Socci, C.; Zotti, J.; Infantino, G. The suggested structure of final demand shock for sectoral labour digital skills. Econ. Syst. Res. 2020, 32, 502–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stephenson, N. Snow Crash; Bantam Books: New York, NY, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Zalan, T.; Barbesino, P. Making the metaverse real. Digit. Bus. 2023, 3, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thesaurus.net. Available online: https://www.thesaurus.net/meta (accessed on 12 July 2023).
- Chen, Z. Metaverse office: Exploring future teleworking model. Kybernetes 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerdvibulvech, C. Digital Human Emotion Modeling Application Using Metaverse Technology in the Post-COVID-19 Era. In Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Duffy, V.G., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; Volume 14029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.10. 2019. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.10.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2023).
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Baabdullah, A.M.; Ribeiro-Navarrete, S.; Giannakis, M.; Al-Debei, M.M.; Dennehy, D.; Metri, B.; Buhalis, D.; Cheung, C.M.; et al. Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 66, 102542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogel, S. How Virtual Reality Can Help Accountants with CPD. Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. 2021. Available online: https://www.icaew.com/insights/viewpoints-on-the-news/2020/aug-2020/how-virtual-reality-can-help-accountants-with-cpd (accessed on 12 June 2023).
- Burlea-Schiopoiu, A.; Remme, J. The Dangers of Dispersal of Responsibilities. Amfiteatru Econ. 2017, 19, 464–476. [Google Scholar]
- Alshaikh, M.A. The Impact of Accounting Information on Stock Returns–Integrative Literature Review. Asia-Pac. J. Manag. Technol. 2022, 3, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferri, L.; Spanò, R.; Ginesti, G.; Theodosopoulos, G. Ascertaining auditors’ intentions to use blockchain technology: Evidence from the Big 4 accountancy firms in Italy. Meditari Account. Res. 2021, 29, 1063–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, K. Digital Asset Valuation and Cyber Risk Measurement: Principles of Cybernomics; Academic Press: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zadorozhnyi, Z.M.; Muravskyi, V.; Humenna-Derij, M.; Zarudna, N. Innovative Accounting and Audit of the Metaverse Resources, Marketing and Management of Innovations. 2022. Available online: https://dev-mmi.sumdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/A653-2022-02_Zadorozhnyi_et_al.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2023).
- Deloitte. The Metaverse: Accounting Considerations Related to Nonfungible Tokens. 2022. Available online: https://dart.deloitte.com/USDART/home/publications/deloitte/accounting-spotlight/2022/metaverse-accounting-considerations (accessed on 16 July 2023).
- Burlea-Schiopoiu, A.; Borcan, I.; Dragan, C.O. The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on the Digital Transformation of Organizations. Electronics 2023, 12, 1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Cordero, E.; Maldonado-López, B.; Ledesma-Chaves, P.; García-Guzmán, A. Do small- and medium-sized companies intend to use the Metaverse as part of their strategy? A behavioral intention analysis. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aburbeian, A.M.; Owda, A.Y.; Owda, M. A Technology Acceptance Model Survey of the Metaverse Prospects. AI 2022, 3, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gansser, O.A.; Reich, C.S. A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application. Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stripe. The ASC 606 How-To Guide: Revenue Recognition in Five Steps. Last Updated 26 April 2023. Available online: https://stripe.com/en-ro/resources/more/asc-606-how-to-guide (accessed on 11 June 2023).
- Tafon, C.; Sullivan, G.; Self, S.; Sullivan, A. Implementation Critical Success Factors and Accounting Standard Codification Topic 606 Implementation Dynamics: A Correlational Study. J. Account. Financ. 2022, 22, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokina, J.; Davenport, T.H. The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence: How Automation is Changing Auditing. J. Emerg. Technol. Account. 2017, 14, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruskopf, S.; Lobbas, C.; Meinander, H.; Söderling, K.; Martikainen, M.; Lehner, O. Digital Accounting and the Human Factor: Theory and Practice. ACRN J. Financ. Risk Perspect. 2020, 9, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKinsey. Value Creation in the Metaverse. The Real Business of the Virtual World. 2020. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/marketing%20and%20sales/our%20insights/value%20creation%20in%20the%20metaverse/Value-creation-in-the-metaverse.pdf (accessed on 12 July 2023).
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Venkatesh, V.; Bala, H. Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decis. Sci. 2008, 39, 273–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Q. 1989, 13, 319–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, C.S.; Al-Gahtani, S.; Hubona, G. The Value of TAM Antecedents in Global IS Development and Research. J. Organ. End User Comput. 2011, 23, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albayati, H.; Alistarbadi, N.; Rho, J.J. Assessing engagement decisions in NFT Metaverse based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Telemat. Inform. Rep. 2023, 10, 100045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, G.; Paul, J. CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 173, 121092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Rigdon, E.E.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. On Comparing Results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Five Perspectives and Five Recommendations. ZFP–J. Res. Manag. 2017, 39, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N.; Lynn, G.S. Stevens Institute of Technology Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2012, 13, 546–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dionisio, J.D.N.; Burns, W.G., III; Gilbert, R. 3D Virtual worlds and the metaverse: Current status and future possibilities. ACM Comput. Surv. 2013, 45, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burlea-Schiopoiu, A. Success Factors for an Information Systems Projects Team Creating New Context. In Proceedings of the 11th International-Business-Information-Management-Association Conference. Innovation and Knowledge Management in Twin Track Economies: Challenges & Solutions, Cairo, Egypt, 4–6 January 2009; Volume 1–3, pp. 936–941. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Gnbri, M.K.A. Accounting and auditing in the metaverse world from a virtual reality perspective: A future research. J. Metaverse 2022, 2, 29–41. [Google Scholar]
- Park, S.-M.; Kim, Y.-G. A Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 4209–4251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, L.-H.; Braud, T.; Zhou, P.; Wang, L.; Xu, D.; Lin, Z.; Kumar, A.; Bermejo, C.; Hui, P. All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.05352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abumalloh, R.A.; Nilashi, M.; Ooi, K.B.; Wei-Han, G.; Cham, T.-H.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L. The adoption of metaverse in the retail industry and its impact on sustainable competitive advantage: Moderating impact of sustainability commitment. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, M.A. Genome Island: A virtual science environment in second life. Innov. J. Online Educ. 2009, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kyung, P.S.; Ji, K.Y. A Study on the intentions of early users of metaverse platforms using the Technology Acceptance Model. J. Digit. Converg. 2021, 19, 275–285. [Google Scholar]
- An, J. Technology acceptance and influencing factor of anatomy learning using augmented reality: Usability based on the technology acceptance model. J. Korea Converg. Soc. 2019, 10, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awang, Y.; Taib, A.; Shuhidan, S.M.; Zakaria, Z.N.Z.; Ifada, L.M.; Sulistyowati, S. Mapping between Digital Competencies and Digitalization of the Accounting Profession among Postgraduate Accounting Students. Asian J. Univ. Educ. 2023, 19, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, G.; Seow, P.-S. Preparing accounting graduates for digital revolution: A critical review of information technology competencies and skills development. J. Educ. Bus. 2016, 91, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, M.J.A.; da Silva, A.C.F.; Ferreira, C.G. The Future of Accounting: How Will Digital Transformation Impact the Sector? Informatics 2022, 9, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quattrone, P. Management accounting goes digital: Will the move make it wiser? Manag. Account. Res. 2016, 31, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, D.; Gilmour, P. Accounting meets metaverse: Navigating the intersection between the real and virtual worlds. J. Financ. Rep. Account. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grossi, G.; Biancone, P.P.; Secinaro, S.; Brescia, V. Dialogic accounting through popular reporting and digital platforms. Meditari Account. Res. 2021, 29, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Rollins, J.; Yan, E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 115, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allam, Z.; Sharifi, A.; Bibri, S.E.; Jones, D.S.; Krogstie, J. The Metaverse as a Virtual Form of Smart Cities: Opportunities and Challenges for Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Urban Futures. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 771–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakavachara, V.; Saengchote, K. Does unit of account affect willingness to pay? Evidence from metaverse LAND transactions. Finance Res. Lett. 2022, 49, 103089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spanò, R.; Massaro, M.; Ferri, L.; Dumay, J.; Schmitz, J. Blockchain in accounting, accountability and assurance: An overview. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2022, 35, 1493–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellahi, R.M.; Wood, L.C.; Bekhit, A.E.-D.A. Blockchain-Based Frameworks for Food Traceability: A Systematic Review. Foods 2023, 12, 3026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naqvi, N. Metaverse for Public Good: Embracing the Societal Impact of Metaverse Economies. J. Br. Blockchain Assoc. 2023, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Damar, M. Metaverse shape of your life for future: A bibliometric snapshot. J. Metaverse 2021, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Emran, M. Beyond technology acceptance: Development and evaluation of technology-environmental, economic, and social sustainability theory. Technol. Soc. 2023, 75, 102383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrigno, G.; Di Paola, N.; Oguntegbe, K.F.; Kraus, S. Value creation in the metaverse age: A thematic analysis of press releases. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2023, 29, 337–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Relationships between Variables of TPB | Relationships between Variables of TAM3 | Relationships between Variables of MAB |
---|---|---|
Intention is the central point of the model and has the role of a link between Behavior and three other variables: Attitude toward Behavior, Subjective Norm, and Perceived Behavioral Control. | Behavioral Intention keeps its central role, linking Use Behavior with two other main variables: Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use. | Intention no longer occupies the central place but becomes a link between Perceived Behavioral Control in the Metaverse and Perceived Behavioral Control in the Metaverse on the one hand and between Perceived Utility of Working in the Metaverse and Perceived Behavioral Control in the Metaverse on the other hand because the Intention of accountants to work in the Metaverse influences Perceived Behavioral Control in the Metaverse as a particularity of virtual reality. |
Paradoxically, Intention is the variable accompanying, like a red thread, the evolution of behavioral models from TPB to TAM3. However, in the case of the MAB model and as a consequence of virtual reality, the Intention of accountants to work in the Metaverse is not influenced by Interaction in the Metaverse. In conclusion, the interaction between users in the virtual world no longer represents a predictor for accountants’ intention to work in the metaverse |
Variable/Item | Mean | SD | Loading | VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intention of accountants to work in the metaverse (IWM): Cronbach’s alpha = 0.764, CR = 0.766, AVE = 0.809 | ||||
IWM1 | 4.19 | 0.637 | 0.900 | 1.617 |
IWM2 | 4.15 | 0.621 | 0.899 | 1.619 |
Perceived behavioral control in the metaverse (PBCM): Cronbach’s alpha = 0.878, CR = 0.879, AVE = 0.805 | ||||
PBCM1 | 4.13 | 0.612 | 0.889 | 2.404 |
PBCM2 | 4.12 | 0.623 | 0.927 | 3.226 |
PBCM3 | 4.19 | 0.644 | 0.874 | 2.261 |
Perceived utility of working in the metaverse (PUM): Cronbach’s alpha = 0.860, CR = 0.882, AVE = 0.703 | ||||
PUM1 | 3.98 | 0.643 | 0.869 | 2.309 |
PUM2 | 3.88 | 0.603 | 0.891 | 2.597 |
PUM3 | 3.89 | 0.772 | 0.847 | 1.948 |
PUM4 | 3.98 | 0.643 | 0.739 | 1.644 |
Interaction in the metaverse (IM): Cronbach’s alpha = 0.839, CR = 0.842, AVE = 0.756 | ||||
IM1 | 3.84 | 0.707 | 0.860 | 2.004 |
IM2 | 3.82 | 0.705 | 0.869 | 1.857 |
IM3 | 3.81 | 0.694 | 0.879 | 2.092 |
Original Sample (O) | Sample Mean (M) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | p Values | Status of Hypothesis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: IM -> IWM | 0.053 | 0.052 | 0.040 | 1.320 | 0.187 | Not supported |
H2: IM -> PUM | 0.462 | 0.463 | 0.034 | 13.568 | 0.000 | Supported |
H3: IWM -> PBCM | 0.764 | 0.764 | 0.021 | 35.796 | 0.000 | Supported |
H4: PUM -> IWM | 0.164 | 0.166 | 0.044 | 3.712 | 0.000 | Supported |
H5: PUM -> PBCM | 0.074 | 0.075 | 0.029 | 2.529 | 0.011 | Supported |
H6: Gender x IM -> PUM | −0.019 | −0.018 | 0.037 | 0.522 | 0.602 | Not supported |
H7: Age x PUM -> IWM | 0.135 | 0.135 | 0.040 | 3.347 | 0.001 | Supported |
Gender -> PUM | −0.109 | −0.108 | 0.036 | 3.060 | 0.002 | Supported |
Age -> IWM | −0.367 | −0.365 | 0.043 | 8.489 | 0.000 | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Burlea-Schiopoiu, A.; Popovici, N.; Panait, N.G. Metaverse Acceptance by the Accounting Community as a Premise of Sustainable Behavior. Systems 2023, 11, 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120560
Burlea-Schiopoiu A, Popovici N, Panait NG. Metaverse Acceptance by the Accounting Community as a Premise of Sustainable Behavior. Systems. 2023; 11(12):560. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120560
Chicago/Turabian StyleBurlea-Schiopoiu, Adriana, Norina Popovici, and Nicoleta Georgeta Panait. 2023. "Metaverse Acceptance by the Accounting Community as a Premise of Sustainable Behavior" Systems 11, no. 12: 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120560
APA StyleBurlea-Schiopoiu, A., Popovici, N., & Panait, N. G. (2023). Metaverse Acceptance by the Accounting Community as a Premise of Sustainable Behavior. Systems, 11(12), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120560