Next Article in Journal
How the Oviduct Lipidomic Profile Changes over Time after the Start of an Obesogenic Diet in an Outbred Mouse Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Life-History and Ecological Correlates of Egg and Clutch Mass Variation in Sympatric Bird Species at High Altitude
Previous Article in Journal
Symbiont Identity Impacts the Microbiome and Volatilome of a Model Cnidarian-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Change and Human Activities, the Significant Dynamic Drivers of Himalayan Goral Distribution (Naemorhedus goral)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/biology12071015
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shifts in the Distribution Range and Niche Dynamics of the Globally Threatened Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) Due to Climate Change and Human Population Pressure

by
Muhammad Azhar Jameel
1,
Muhammad Sajid Nadeem
1,
Shiekh Marifatul Haq
2,*,
Iqra Mubeen
3,
Arifa Shabbir
3,
Shahzad Aslam
1,
Riyaz Ahmad
4,
Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar
5,
Bander M. A. Al-Munqedhi
5,* and
Rainer W. Bussmann
2,6
1
Department of Zoology, Wildlife & Fisheries, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan
2
Department of Ethnobotany, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, 0162 Tbilisi, Georgia
3
Department of Zoology, Government College University, Lahore 54300, Pakistan
4
National Center for Wildlife, Riyadh 11575, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Botany, Institute of Life Sciences, State Museum of Natural History, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(7), 1015; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071015
Submission received: 3 June 2023 / Revised: 24 June 2023 / Accepted: 27 June 2023 / Published: 17 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conservation and Evolution of Wildlife in the Context of Climate Change and Human Population Growth)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Given the potential impact of climate change on the distributions of endemic species, it is critical to implement species recovery and habitat management measures to protect threatened species. This study used MaxEnt modeling to assess the species’ habitat suitability in varying climate scenarios in the Western Himalayas and identified ten influential drivers. Our field-based observations of Tragopan melanocephalus show that the species typically lives at elevations between 1850 and 3800 m, which is consistent with the species’ reported affinity for extremely high elevations between 1500 and 4000 m above sea level. Our findings reveal that areas with high and moderate suitability for the species are patchily distributed throughout the Western Himalayas, ranging from northeastern Pakistan to central Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Moreover, there are continuous strips of highly suitable habitats along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, in the Kashmir region, and in the Annapurna region of Uttarakhand. The study observed that the Western Tragopan’s habitat suitability may increase under future climate change scenarios, but additional research is needed to avert population collapses and identify other potential drivers of local extinction occurrences. To support increased biodiversity and lower risks under current and anticipated future climatic conditions, it is advised that the suitable areas identified be designated as nature reserves. According to the study’s findings, a more effective wildlife management strategy might significantly help with the reintroduction of the Tragopan melanocephalus population into its suitable habitats in western Himalaya, thereby advancing the global objectives set for the UN Decade of Ecosystem Restoration targets (2021–2030).

Abstract

The impact of a changing climate, particularly global warming, often harms the distribution of pheasants, particularly those with limited endemic ranges. To effectively create plans of action aimed at conserving species facing threats such as the Western Tragopan, (Tragopan melanocephalus; Gray, 1829; Galliformes, found in the western Himalayas), it is crucial to understand how future distributions may be affected by anticipated climate change. This study utilized MaxEnt modeling to assess how suitable the habitat of the targeted species is likely to be under different climate scenarios. While similar studies have been conducted regionally, there has been no research on this particular endemic animal species found in the western Himalayas throughout the entire distribution range. The study utilized a total of 200 occurrence points; 19 bioclimatic, four anthropogenic, three topographic, and a vegetation variable were also used. To determine the most fitting model, species distribution modeling (SDM) was employed, and the MaxEnt calibration and optimization techniques were utilized. Data for projected climate scenarios of the 2050s and 2070s were obtained from SSPs 245 and SSPs 585. Among all the variables analyzed; aspect, precipitation of coldest quarter, mean diurnal range, enhanced vegetation index, precipitation of driest month, temperature seasonality, annual precipitation, human footprint, precipitation of driest quarter, and temperature annual range were recognized as the most influential drivers, in that order. The predicted scenarios had high accuracy values (AUC-ROC > 0.9). Based on the feedback provided by the inhabitants, it was observed that the livability of the selected species could potentially rise (between 3.7 to 13%) in all projected scenarios of climate change, because this species is relocating towards the northern regions of the elevation gradient, which is farther from the residential areas, and their habitats are shrinking. The suitable habitats of the Tragopan melanocephalus in the Himalayan region will move significantly by 725 m upwards, because of predicted climate change. However, the fact that the species is considered extinct in most areas and only found in small patches suggests that further research is required to avert a further population decline and delineate the reasons leading to the regional extinction of the species. The results of this study can serve as a foundation for devising conservation strategies for Tragopan melanocephalus under the changing climate and provide a framework for subsequent surveillance efforts aimed at protecting the species.

1. Introduction

In an era of global climatic change, the distributions of endemic species change at accelerating rates [1]. Such changes are already altering the composition of ecological communities, but they go beyond natural system conservation [2]. A recent worldwide report has estimated that approximately one million plant and animal species are currently at risk of extinction [3]. This unparalleled loss of biodiversity jeopardizes most of the United Nations’ sustainable development goals, including the elimination of poverty and associated environmental issues [4]. Hence, the foremost environmental priorities of the twenty-first century are the conservation of endangered species worldwide and the rehabilitation of damaged ecosystems [5].
One of the main causes of the loss of biodiversity worldwide is unsustainable human activities, resulting in habitat destruction and overexploitation of endemic species [6,7]. Many species are anticipated to alter their present distribution ranges in reaction to climate change to adapt to the altered environmental conditions [8]. While all ecosystems are affected by climate change, high-mountain ecosystems, such as those in the Western Himalayan range, are thought to be more susceptible to warming [9,10]. By the end of the twenty-first century, suitable habitats for several high-mountain animal species may be substantially diminished or even gone, especially in areas where global warming and precipitation decline are occurring together [11]. The biodiversity will be affected by climate change, which may cause species to decline or even go extinct [12,13]. The impact of climate change on biodiversity will be multifaceted, with direct effects arising from fluctuations in temperature and precipitation regimes, as reported by Huang et al. [14], and indirect effects resulting from alterations in permafrost patterns, disturbance dynamics, and shifts in biotic interaction, as noted by Schmeller et al. in his study [15].
In response, the scientific and practitioner communities have amplified their efforts in researching and planning management interventions to support the adaptation of nature to climate change [16]. Prioritizing disturbed landscapes that can support biodiversity protection is essential for conducting recovery initiatives, especially for endemic species that are more susceptible to extinction [17]. In the pursuit of species recovery, conservation managers may encounter difficulties in determining the optimal locations and methods for recovery, especially given the current climate change scenario [18]. Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a promising approach for formulating recovery strategies for endangered endemic species in regions with rich biodiversity. This technique enables the identification of suitable habitats and the prediction of range shifts under climate change projections [19]. The SDM approaches, based on the niche conservatism hypothesis, use data on species distribution combined with climatic and other environmental variables to predict the distribution of species along spatiotemporal gradients [20]. Thus, integrating macro-spatial SDM insights with local-scale ecology can help develop successful recovery plans for species that are threatened globally [21].
The Western Tragopan (WT) is an endemic species found in the western Himalayas, ranging from the Indus-Kohistan region in northern Pakistan to Uttarakhand in northwest India through Kashmir [22]. According to Shah et al. [23], the IUCN Red List has classified this galliform species as “Vulnerable” due to its dwindling and widely dispersed population, which is continuously declining in numbers and becoming fragmented as a result of deforestation, browsing of understory shrubs by livestock, and tree lopping for fodder and fuelwood collection, as well as illegal hunting and habitat degradation, all of which pose a significant threat to its already limited habitat and declining population [24]. In the Himalayas, a rapidly changing climate is expected to increase extinction risks, especially for endemic vulnerable species, necessitating the inclusion of climate change-related risks in conservation plans and species recovery approaches. This study will estimate how the WT range might change concerning various future climate change scenarios and examine WT’s current suitable habitats across its entire distribution range.
The objective of this study was to address recovery issues related to the Western Tragopan by answering the following questions: (i) What environmental factors are critical; what are the ideal microhabitats for the species in the western Himalayas under the current and projected scenarios of climate change? (ii) How will the distribution range of Tragopan melanocephalus be impacted by various future climate change scenarios? (iii) How can the predictions derived from species distribution models (SDMs) be utilized to guide the recovery efforts of the Western Tragopan in the study area? Finally, we aim to offer practical recommendations for the conservation and recovery of the species in the region based on field observations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The Himalayas, known as the “Abode of Snow”, are a relatively young mountain range that acts as a natural barrier between the Indo-Gangetic Plain and the Tibetan Plateau. Extending approximately 2400 km from Afghanistan in the west to Burma in the east, this majestic range spans latitudes 27–36° N and longitudes 72–91° E, serving as a crucial link between the Near East, Central Asia, and East Asia. The Himalayan range is shared by five countries—Nepal, India, China (Tibet), Bhutan, and Pakistan—with the majority of it located within the first three countries [25]. The Western Himalaya refers to the western part of the Himalayan mountain range and encompasses an area of approximately 130,000 km2 (Figure 1). It stretches from Badakhshan in Afghanistan, through northern Pakistan (including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the Jammu and Kashmir region), to North India (including Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, and Himachal Pradesh) and Nepal [26,27,28].

2.2. Species Presence Data

The presence data of Tragopan melanocephalus in the study area was collected using a combination of methods. To collect information on species distribution points (presence points), six years of field surveys were carried out and published data were gathered from the literature and the GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) database from 1864 to 2019. Duplicate records were eliminated to avoid the overrepresentation of certain areas. The selection of presence points was conducted with careful consideration to prevent spatial pseudo-replication. The resolution of the raster data, which was 2.5 arc-minutes, guided the process. Only GPS locations with an accuracy of 15 m were chosen and filtered to ensure that only one presence point was retained within each 5 km2 pixel. This approach was adopted to avoid any potential bias that may arise from having multiple presence points in close proximity to each other. This approach is common in species distribution modeling to ensure that the data used are not biased and the species distribution in the study area is represented with accuracy.
Our research team conducted several field surveys from 2016 to 2022 to document the presence points of Tragopan melanocephalus in the Western Himalayas. We used binoculars (8 × 40) and spotting scopes (15 × 45) to observe the species from different trails and viewpoints in their potential habitat. For every sighting, we recorded the habitat characteristics, including the proximity to the nearest cliff and the degree of slope ruggedness. We also recorded the location and elevation using a handheld GPS (Global Positioning System) device. In addition, we also kept a watch out for illicit activities including habitat destruction, illegal hunting and poaching, and natural disturbance throughout our field surveys (Figure 2). To gather more information about the possible presence of the Western Tragopan, and illegal activities in potential habitats, we deployed a questionnaire survey that we administered to knowledgeable local personnel and staff from different departments. We assessed their knowledge of the species through discussions and interactions with them. We obtained a total of 200 distinct presence points of the Tragopan melanocephalus to develop the Species Distribution Model (SDM).

2.3. Environmental Data Collection and Variable Selection

The study acquired 19 bioclimatic factors with a resolution of 2.5 arc-minutes and elevation information with a resolution of 30 arc-seconds from the WorldClim website (ver. 2.1) (www.worldclim.org, accessed on 15 March 2023) (Table 1). Topographic input data comprising altitude, slope gradient, and aspect were chosen and extracted as variable layers from the ArcGIS 10.5 software and used to apply spatial analysis tools for creating a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). We incorporated four anthropogenic variables to act as proxies for human impact in addition to environmental factors. These variables were Land cover, Road proximity, Population density, and the Human footprint (HFP), which measures human perturbation. The HFP map, which was sourced from the Socio-Economic Data and Applications Centre (http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu. accessed on 5 April 2022), integrates worldwide data layers associated with factors that potentially impact ecosystems, such as human population distribution, urbanization, navigable rivers, roads, and diverse agricultural land uses. The scale of the HFP layer ranges from 0, which represents areas that are near natural or pristine, to 50, which suggests regions that are severely degraded.
The Global Land Cover data included nine categories: forest, shrubland, savannah, grassland, cropland/natural vegetation, wetland, urban, snow/ice, and barren/sparsely vegetated areas. The source of the data was the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (MODIS Global Land Cover Classification v2, http://www.modis.bu.edu/landcover. accessed on 5 April 2022). The population density was gathered from Oak Ridge National Laboratory (http://www.ornl.gov/sci/landscan. accessed on 4 April 2022) as a separate layer because it has been demonstrated to significantly affect the dispersion of invasive species. For the vegetation variable, we utilized the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) of the MODIS products (MOD13A3) and followed the same variability in climatic variables for vegetation, namely, mean annual EVI and EVI seasonality. We chose to employ EVI (Enhanced Vegetation Index) rather than the more widely used NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) due to its capacity to decrease canopy background fluctuation and preserve sensitivity in areas with dense vegetation. EVI is also better able to deal with lingering smoke and sub-pixel cloud contamination in the atmosphere. EVI is Terra MODIS ready-to-use files (MOD11 and MOD13, respectively) that can be downloaded from GLOVIS (http://glovis.usgs.gov/ accessed on 4 April 2022). For future simulations, we acquired two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs)—SSPs 245 and SSPs 585—from the Coupled Model Intercomparing Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6) for two distinct timeframes: the 2050s (2041–2060) and the 2070s (2061–2080). To perform these simulations, we utilized the Global Climate Model of BCC-CSM2-MR, which has a resolution of 2.5 arc-min.
Various factors, such as precipitation, temperature, geographical barriers, geological formations, and other biological variables, collectively affect the distribution of the Western Tragopan [29,30]. To evaluate which environmental factors affect the species’ distribution, our model employed 19 bioclimatic, four anthropogenic (human footprint, road proximity, land cover, and human population density), and three biophysical (aspect, elevation, and slope) variables along with vegetation.
This study used a two-step procedure to guarantee independence and omit spatially linked data items. First, a preliminary model with default settings was implemented to ascertain the contribution of each variable. We set a threshold of >1% to filter out variables that did not meet the criterion. Secondly, in order to locate and eliminate any potential spatial association, we then assessed the remaining variables (above the contribution threshold) for pairwise Pearson’s association (r). To reduce the number of variables further, a threshold value (r ≥ ±0.8) was employed. If two variables had an r value above this threshold, the one with the lesser contribution was omitted [29,31,32,33,34,35,36].

2.4. Preliminary Variables Processing

After applying the contribution and Pearson’s correlation coefficient threshold, 10 important bioclimatic and topographic variables were identified. These variables include aspect, precipitation of coldest quarter, mean diurnal range, enhanced vegetation index, precipitation of driest quarter, temperature seasonality, annual precipitation, human footprint, precipitation of driest quarter, and temperature annual range [37]. The pairwise correlation between these selected variables can be seen in Figure 3.

2.5. Model Calibration and Optimization

In species distribution modeling (SDM), calibrating and optimizing MaxEnt prediction models is crucial for selecting the best model. This is often achieved by tuning the model with various regularization multiplier (RM) values and feature classes (FC) to improve prediction reliability and prevent overfitting. To identify the optimal MaxEnt model settings, threshold-dependent evaluation metrics (i.e., omission rate) were used to improve model transferability. The study targeted multiple combinations of eight RM values (ranging from 1 to 4 with a 0.5 interval) and six FCs (L, LQ, H, LQH, LQHP, and LQHPT where L = Linear, Q = Quadratic, H = Hinge, P = Product, T = Threshold) [35,38].
To generate the bias file for our model, we utilized the ENMEval package in the R programming environment. The MaxEnt version 3.4.4 was employed to assess the data and make predictions regarding the optimal habitats for Tragopan melanocephalus within our study area, following established methodologies [34,39,40,41]. The MaxEnt model, which is rooted in ecological niche theory and incorporates information from presence data, allows us to estimate the potential distribution of the target species in our research region [37,42]. MaxEnt software is recognized as one of the most advanced and promising methods for species distribution modeling, as it excels in accurately identifying the most suitable habitats for a given species based on available presence data [38,40,43,44]. Due to its superior prediction accuracy, MaxEnt has become the preferred approach over other methods [42,43,45,46].
To investigate the relationship between environmental conditions and wildlife distributions, we utilized MaxEnt, a reliable machine-learning technique for species distribution modeling [47,48]. Our goal was to determine a link between climatic variables and the occurrences of the species. The 10th percentile presence probability of the species, a 10-fold cross-validation approach, a complementary log-log (clog-log) output format, 10,000 background points, 10 repeat runs, 500 iterations, response curve generation, and an analysis of Jackknife importance in all final optimized SDMs were some of the MaxEnt configurations we used to improve the model’s accuracy and performance.

2.6. Reclassification of Predictions and Model Evaluation

The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve’s area under the curve (AUC) measurements were used to assess how well the optimized SDMs performed. Better model prediction accuracy is indicated by a high AUC-ROC value; a good score is one of 0.9 or higher [34,40,43,44,46,49,50]. The AUC score serves as an indicator of the model’s performance in terms of fitting the test data and its ability to discriminate between different variations in species distribution under potential future climate conditions [34,40,44]. An AUC value of 0.5 suggests that the model’s performance is no better than random chance, while a value closer to 1.0 indicates that the model performs better than chance [51]. The AUC score provides valuable insights into the accuracy and reliability of the model’s predictions. The MaxEnt prediction output for the possible Western Tragopan habitat suitability ranged from 0 to 1 and was classified into five levels of suitability: not suitable habitat (NS) (0–0.2), low suitability habitat (LS) (0.21–0.4), moderately suitable habitat (MS) (0.41–0.6), highly suitable habitat (HS) (0.61–0.80), and very highly suitable (VHS) (0.81–1) [40,45,52].

3. Results

3.1. Model Evaluation

We ran MaxEnt for 10 replications and averaged the results to generate a single model prediction. This is a good practice as it helps to reduce the potential influence of random variation in the model. Response curves can visually illustrate the correlation between environmental variables and the estimated probability of species occurrence. These curves can help to identify which variables have the strongest influence on the species distribution and can aid in understanding the ecological factors driving the species distribution. The AUC (area under the curve) graph is a popular tool for assessing how well species distribution models function. The area under the curve (AUC), which measures the model’s capacity to distinguish between the locations of a species presence and absence, is used to assess the model’s performance. The next step is to establish suitability inferences and identify prospective migration paths using the average model. The best candidate model in this investigation, with an AUC score of 0.992, was created using LQH as FCs and an RM value of 1.5. We used MaxEnt to generate a predictive habitat suitability score for the Tragopan melanocephalus in the Western Himalayan region. This score ranged from 0 to 0.99, indicating the predicted suitability of different areas for the species. The MaxEnt model’s predictive performance is measured by the AUC value, which shows how well it can distinguish between sites that have the species and those that do not. The AUC ranges between 0.5 (no better than random) and 1.0 (perfect discrimination). While the AUC is a helpful indicator of model performance, it should not be the only factor considered when assessing the model. Our findings suggest that the MaxEnt model created a ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve automatically (Figure 4). The genuine positive rate (sensitivity) vs. the false positive rate (1-specificity) for various anticipated probability thresholds is plotted on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This shows how the model can identify real positives with accuracy while minimizing false positives. Our curve analysis demonstrated that the average AUC value of the model was 0.992, indicating a significantly higher performance compared to the AUC of the random prediction model (0.5). This shows that the predictions made by the model were very accurate and closely matched the actual range of the species.

3.2. Elucidating the Ecological Factors Underlying the Spatial Distribution Patterns

The variables that contribute most to Tragopan melanocephalus’ habitat appropriateness include aspect, precipitation of coldest quarter; mean diurnal range, enhanced vegetation index, precipitation of driest quarter, and temperature seasonality. The factors that had a comparatively small impact on the SDMs of Tragopan melanocephalus were annual precipitation, precipitation of the driest quarter, human footprint, and temperature annual range (Table 2).
The findings suggest that the chosen variables aptly captured the present distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus. Specifically, the Jackknife test revealed that the aspect and precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio19) were particularly influential in shaping the species’ distribution, contributing to 36.5% and 34.7% of the variance explained by the MaxEnt model, respectively (Figure 5). Due to their high contribution rates, we conducted a separate analysis of the influence of aspect and bio19 as individual factors. The probability of Tragopan melanocephalus presence initially increased and then stabilized as annual precipitation increased, as shown in Figure 6.
Furthermore, as annual precipitation increased, there was an initial increase in the chance of Tragopan melanocephalus presence, which then stabilized. This suggests that annual precipitation may have a complex relationship with the presence of the species, and further research may be necessary to fully understand this relationship. When the annual precipitation exceeded 250 mm, the probability of encountering Tragopan melanocephalus was above 0.6, indicating the presence of highly suitable areas for the species. The peak chance of occurrence was at approximately 500 mm, with a likelihood of around 0.7. The suitable habitats with high probability had an aspect between 60–100 degrees, as shown in Figure 7.

3.3. Current Distribution

The Himalayan range is indeed a vast and geographically diverse region, spanning seven Asian countries including India, Nepal, and Pakistan. With an area of approximately 2500 km2, it covers a significant portion of the Indian subcontinent, including 11 states and the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The Western Himalayas include several mountain ranges of India, including the Zanskar Range, Pir Panjal Range, Dhauladhar Range, and western parts of the Sivalik Range and the western Himalayas. The Zanskar Range is a sub-range of the Great Himalayas, located in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. The Pir Panjal Range is a subrange of the Himalayas that runs from central Afghanistan to northern Pakistan and northern India. The Dhauladhar Range is a subrange of the Himalayas that runs from the Indian state of Himachal Pradesh to the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. The Sivalik Range is a mountain range that runs parallel to the Himalayas, along the northern border of India, Nepal, and Bhutan. The region is known for its rich biodiversity and unique forest ecosystems, including Himalayan dry temperate forests to subalpine forest types. It is home to a wide range of plant and animal species, including several that are endemic to the region (Figure 1). Using a species distribution model, we were able to identify the current locations where Tragopan melanocephalus is likely to be found (Figure 8). While Tragopan melanocephalus is known to occur in the Western Himalayan region spanning from northwest India through the Jammu and Kashmir area into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan, the distribution of suitable habitats across the upper Himalayas is uneven. Our findings reveal that areas with high and moderate suitability for the species are patchily distributed throughout the western Himalayas, ranging from northeastern Pakistan to central Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand. Moreover, there are continuous strips of highly suitable habitats along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, in the Kashmir region of Uttarakhand, and in the Annapurna region. The analysis revealed that Kazinag National Park, Lachipora wildlife sanctuary, Tattakuti wildlife sanctuary, Limber wildlife sanctuary, and Khara Gali community reserve are the hotspots for Tragopan melanocephalus in the western Himalayan regions of India. Similarly, in Pakistan’s endemic region of Tragopan melanocephalus, the study identified core zones or hot places such as Indus Kohistan (Palas Valley), Kaghan Valley, Machiara National Park, Pir Chenasi, Nellum Valley, Salkhala, and Jugran Valley.

3.4. Suitability of Habitats under Future Scenarios of Climate Change

After examining the potential impacts of climate change on the species distribution, we found that the current most suitable habitat of Tragopan melanocephalus is likely to shrink and shift towards the north and across elevation gradients. According to the analysis of all four Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) scenarios for the 2050s and 2070s, the predicted suitable habitat of Tragopan melanocephalus is expected to shift towards the north in Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa), and Uttarakhand, India. Consequently, there will likely be a contiguous range of highly suitable locations in the northern region of Jammu and Kashmir and its adjacent areas (Figure 8). Suitable habitats for Tragopan melanocephalus are projected to become increasingly scarce by 2050 under four different scenarios. In the SSPs 245 and SSPs 585 scenarios, the majority of accessible suitable locations will be in western Himachal Pradesh and Uttarakhand, as well as in the surrounding regions of Tibet near the border of the three countries. Under the SSPs 346 scenario, it is projected that a significant portion of the habitat between the Indian region and the Pak-Afghan border will disappear by 2050. Only a few narrow stretches of viable habitat are expected to remain in Himachal, specifically between the Kashmir region and Uttarakhand. According to the SSPs 245 and SSPs 585 scenarios, Tragopan melanocephalus may not have a suitable habitat in the Kashmir region, along the Pakistan–Afghanistan border, or in the Annapurna region by the year 2050.
Under all four-climate change scenarios examined, it is predicted that highly suitable habitats in the vicinity of the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, Kashmir, and Himachal will be lost by the 2070s. Additionally, the western Himalayan regions in Uttarakhand, spanning the Indian, Pakistani, and Afghan Himalayas, are also at risk of losing all their current suitable and highly suitable habitats by the 2050s and 2070s under the SSPs 245 and SSPs 585 scenarios. Moreover, between 2050 and 2070, only marginally suitable locations may be available in Pakistan, Kashmir, and central Himachal Pradesh, primarily in the Pak-Afghan border region.
A projection analysis revealed that the Tragopan melanocephalus habitat is anticipated to expand more under the SSPs 585 scenario by 2050, with a denser distribution over West Nepal, Uttarakhand, and their adjoining areas in Tibet compared to SSPs 245. However, by 2070, the habitat pattern would be similar in both scenarios. In SSPs 585, it is expected that Tragopan melanocephalus habitat would further expand in Uttarakhand and neighboring territories in Pakistan (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa). This prediction is illustrated in Figure 9.
According to this study, the total potential habitat suitability (p > 0.2) for Western Tragopan may decrease in the future. This decrease is estimated to be at a rate of −2.4% compared to the current distribution range, resulting in potential habitat suitability of 47,357 km2 under SSPs 245 of the 2050s, and a −3.7% rate of change, leading to potential habitat suitability of 41,045 km2 under SSPs 585 of 2050s. Similarly, under SSP 245 of 2070s, the potential habitat suitability is expected to reduce to 44,874 km2, which is a −2.9% rate of change, and 33,790 km2 (−5.2% rate of change) under SSPs 585 of 2070s. If we consider SSPs 245 in the 2050s, there is a prediction that the very high suitability habitat (VHS) will reduce slightly from its current climate, specifically from 9489 km2 to 7838 km2 (−0.3% rate of change). Similarly, within highly suitable habitat (VHS), the potentially suitable land area is estimated to reduce to 6156 km2 (−0.7%) under SSPs 585 of the 2050s, 6267 km2 (−0.6%) under SSPs 245 of 2070s, and 5358 km2 (−0.8%) under SSPs 585 of 2070s (Table 3). Due to projected climate change, there will be significant shifts in the suitable habitats within the Himalayan region of both Pakistan and India. In the Pakistani Himalayan part, the suitable habitat range is expected to shift from an elevation of 500 m to 800 m. Conversely, in the Indian Himalayan part, the suitable habitats will experience a shift from 600 m to 1000 m in elevation. These changes indicate the potential relocation of species and ecosystems as they adapt to the altered environmental conditions caused by climate change. The mean elevation shift of the habitat was 725 ± 221 m.

4. Discussion

The advancement of GIS technology in the last 20 years has facilitated the collection of spatial and temporal datasets, which has resulted in a more comprehensive understanding of species distribution patterns and the impact of environmental factors at various scales [53]. In this study, we present the first extensive analysis of Tragopan melanocephalus’ distribution, habitat suitability, and projections of hotspots. The habitat suitability classes identified in this study (Table 3) indicate that areas with low suitability (probability 0.21–0.4), moderate suitability (probability 0.41–0.6), and high suitability (probability 0.61–0.8) for the Western Tragopan are expected to decrease, while regions with very high suitability (probability 0.81–1.0) are expected to expand significantly in the future. The increased building of dams, hydroelectric power plants, urbanization, and deforestation for agricultural purposes in the study area may be partially responsible for the accelerated rate of habitat fragmentation and degradation, which has resulted in the loss of acceptable habitats in specific locations [54,55].
The predictive ability of our model was robust, and it yielded highly significant results, as demonstrated by the AUC value exceeding 0.9 [56,57]. The AUC value of 0.992 for the current climate model indicated its precise and comprehensive characterization of Tragopan melanocephalus’ habitat, accurately distinguishing between the presence and absence of the species in the western Himalayan region. Our assessment of habitat suitability was consistent with available occurrence records. In predicting the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus, the model identified precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio19) and Mean Diurnal Range (Bio02) as the two most significant bioclimatic variables. This is congruent with independent studies [39,41] that identified annual precipitation (BIO 12) and mean diurnal range (Bio02) as the primary factors influencing the species distribution in the western Himalayan ranges of India and Pakistan. Notably, climate change in the western Himalayan regions of Pakistan has resulted in heavy precipitation and flooding in the valleys’ interiors, as recorded in 2008, 2010, 2017, 2020, and 2022.
The field-based observations of Tragopan melanocephalus presence records revealed that the species predominantly occupies elevations between 1850 to 3800 masl. This finding aligns with the species’ recognized inclination for extreme elevations, typically ranging from 1500 to 4000 masl. Several studies have provided supporting evidence regarding the preferred elevational range of Tragopan melanocephalus. Studies by Jameel et al. [54] and Awan et al. [39] conducted in the Western Himalayas (Pakistan) reported the presence of the species at elevations between 2000 and 4000 masl. Similarly, another study by Sing et al. [41] in the Western Himalayas (India) documented the species’ occurrence at elevations ranging from 1800 to 3800 masl. Our findings align with previous studies indicating that the preferred habitat for Tragopan melanocephalus in Pakistan and India is located in the upper mid-hill to high-mountain regions, specifically at elevations above 2000 masl [24,39,41]. This consistency in habitat preference across studies further strengthens the understanding of the species’ ecological requirements and provides valuable insights for conservation and management strategies in these regions. The species tends to favor areas with dense vegetation cover of 70–80% ground, including shrublands and forests. The common conifer trees in forest areas preferred by the species include Pinus wallichiana, Abies pindrow, Picea smithiana, and Cedrus deodara, along with another broad-leaved understory vegetation such as Betula utilis, Quercus semecarpifolia, Acer caesium, and Juglans regia [39,54]. However, we observed that the Tragopan melanocephalus is shifting further upward along the elevation and attempting to avoid the growing heat and anthropogenic disturbances during breeding time. Comparable findings were made by Awan et al. [39] who noted similar tree preferences for Western Tragopan in Pakistan. The projections from both SSPs 245 and 585 scenarios indicate that there will be an overlap in the habitat of Tragopan melanocephalus in the future, with a significant portion of the habitat shifting up to 725 ± 221 m from lowest range. These findings were supported by previous studies of Feeley et al. [58] which showed that montane forest habitats and species have migrated on average 6.1 m and Forero-Medina et al. [59] predicted a shift in their elevational range on average by around 500 m upslope per decade, respectively. The model identified two key bioclimate variables, namely, precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio19) and Mean Diurnal Range (Bio02), as the most influential factors in predicting the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus. The model projections indicate that any changes in the species’ habitat along the elevation and aspect gradients in the study area are expected to be primarily longitudinal rather than latitudinal, suggesting that the species tends to be sedentary and remains within a specific home range throughout the year. Additionally, we observed that although Tragopan melanocephalus showed a general movement in their mean elevation, their elevational borders showed little change. The recurring pattern of an anticipated northward shift in Tragopan melanocephalus ranges in distinct Himalayan geographic regions offers strong proof that range shifts are a result of climate change [60].
The findings of this study are consistent with previous research [24,39,41,61], which suggests that aspect is a key factor in predicting the habitat of Tragopan melanocephalus, and agree with Jameel et al. [24] in identifying aspect as a distinguishing characteristic of this species’ habitat in the western Himalayas. Other studies in the western Himalayas of India and Pakistan also support the notion that the ideal habitat for Tragopan falls within a similar altitude range and is characterized by specific aspects [24,41,61]. Human activities, such as settlement patterns, may also play a role in habitat selection and directly impact the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus, with evidence of habitat shrinkage due to new settlements in the study area, as also documented by Awan et al. [39] in their study.
Hunting and poaching were also identified as the most serious threats to the species’ current habitats. Our study supports the conclusions of the documented studies [24,39,41] that hunting poses major problems for the conservation of the Tragopan. The hunting season is most active in the winter when the species are more likely to be found close to human settlements. Hunting is most commonly done at night in Pakistan’s western Himalayan region and during the day in India’s western Himalayan region. During field surveys, it was also observed that the current habitat ranges of Tragopan melanocephalus are rapidly disturbed through non-timber forest collection, forest cutting, and overgrazing. Inskipp et al. [62] performed this type of analysis to determine the human pressures on threatened species, notably Western Tragopan, and discovered effects on distribution. We also noticed that the majority of the wildlife staff was illiterate, unequipped, and had no authority to deal with offenders. The same observations and findings were published by Awan et al. [39], who discovered that law enforcement authorities were weak and had little control over conservation issues, notably unlawful hunting.
Developing effective conservation strategies relies on understanding how species respond to climate change [63,64,65]. Research has shown that climate change has direct effects on various species and their ecosystems [63,66,67,68]. The primary objective of this study was to assess the potential changes in the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus in response to various climate change scenarios. The MaxEnt modeling approach was used to predict the current and future distribution of the species in the western Himalayan region under various greenhouse gas emission scenarios over different periods. The study results indicate a projected decrease in the species’ distribution across the region in response to anticipated climate conditions for the years 2050 and 2070, as evaluated through the application of two selected SSPs (245 and 585). The simulations demonstrate the potential disappearance of the species, leading to a shift in both the overall range and core habitats in the future. Given its habitat confinement to isolated patches, Tragopan melanocephalus exhibits heightened vulnerability to climate change. This susceptibility is attributed to the species’ small ecological niche, which renders it more sensitive compared to species with broader ecological ranges [69,70]. This range shift may be due to the environmental envelope (precipitation and temperature) becoming less conducive to the species’ existence.
While climate change has a significant impact on determining the range of many species, it is important to acknowledge that other factors, such as dispersal patterns and capacity, ecological interactions, resource distribution and availability, and habitat preference, also contribute to their spatial distribution [31,71]. To achieve a more accurate understanding of the species’ range, these factors must be carefully studied and incorporated into species distribution models (SDMs) [45]. However, incomplete data and the challenge of fully integrating species ecology into modeling processes limit this work. Furthermore, factors such as sample size, sampling bias, predictor resolution, selection, and multicollinearity can impact SDM limitations and uncertainties and should be considered during modeling [72,73]. Despite these limitations, the MaxEnt modeling approach was used in this study, given its excellent predictive power and suitability for use with small sample sizes. While the study attempted to address issues such as multicollinearity and sampling bias, uncertainties in the results may still exist, as biotic interactions and dispersal capacity were not explicitly targeted. To improve the accuracy of future habitat distribution maps for the species, physiologically relevant parameters should be integrated into the modeling process. The study’s predictions for the region should be seriously considered for species conservation in the face of climate change, particularly global warming.
The local disappearance of species can lead to significant changes in ecosystem structure and function in any area [48,55,74]. Previous studies in several biodiversity hotspots with a high proportion of vulnerable species indicated that the risk of extinction has increased in recent years due to climate change, habitat degradation, and illegal hunting [23,41,75,76,77,78]. Our results are consistent with previous local or regional studies on climate in similar ecosystems and show that climate is a major factor influencing the habitat suitability of Tragopan melanocephalus [23,41]. Our study aimed to map the current and projected suitable habitats for Tragopan melanocephalus under different climate change scenarios and changing land use. To manage Tragopan melanocephalus and mitigate potential threats, it is essential to understand the impact of climate change and human threats on its distribution. By doing so, we also identified opportunities for protecting other species that share the habitat of Tragopan melanocephalus. The suitable location map and projections generated in this study can be used to identify critical habitat areas that require immediate conservation efforts to mitigate biodiversity loss due to habitat degradation and loss. The high-resolution maps generated by this study offer valuable support to park managers and conservationists by aiding in the identification and prioritization of conservation initiatives. These maps enable the identification of critical habitats at risk and the determination of appropriate conservation measures. By focusing on the preservation of threatened remnants and essential connecting habitats that are projected to vanish in the future, conservation efforts can be directed towards safeguarding these areas of utmost importance.
The present study is unique in that it examined the correlation between ecological variables and the livability of habitats, forecasts modifications in habitat suitability because of climate change, and models the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus across its complete distributional range in the western Himalayas. Considering the scarcity of research on the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus in the region, the findings from this study provide strong evidence for the need for further investigation. It is highly recommended that future investigations prioritize the predicted habitats that are projected to decline in the future. These habitats include regions such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in Pakistan and Uttarakhand in India. Additionally, it would be valuable to focus on monitoring the shifting suitable ranges in the coming years, particularly in the upper ridges of Kashmir and the areas adjacent to the Pakistan and Afghanistan borders. Conducting research in these specific areas will contribute to a better understanding of the species’ distribution patterns and will aid in conservation efforts. To promote conservation efforts, it is also recommended that the identified suitable areas be designated as nature reserves to support increased biodiversity and reduced risks under existing and anticipated future climatic conditions, and this study will help to formulate wildlife conservation management strategies.

Implications for Conservation

Suitable habitat management and conservation directly influence and are the most important factors to reverse the loss of threatened wildlife taxa. Western Tragopan was recorded from unaltered, remote, and wilder habitats, and it was previously observed that the species is a bioindicator for the healthy habitat of the western Himalayan region. Therefore, we propose that this species be used as an indicator species in a western Himalayan ecological restoration project. This will increase conservation and protection for this flagship species. Studies like the current one should be applied to identify the future potential areas and such areas may be protected under community reserves, Protected Areas, and other Conservation Areas to ensure the long-term conservation of the species under the climate change scenario.
During field surveys, it was observed that the current habitat ranges of Tragopan melanocephalus are rapidly disturbed through non-timber forest collection, forest cutting, and overgrazing; as a result, we recommend that strategies be created to lessen the number or frequency of disturbances. Furthermore, large-scale infrastructure and power-generation projects have been observed to alter the habitat. As a result, we recommended that a biodiversity management plan be implemented before embarking on major infrastructure development projects. Poaching was identified as the second most serious threat to the species’ current habitats. The hunting season is most active in the winter when the species are most likely to be near human settlements. We observed that the wildlife staff was mostly illiterate, unequipped, and had little authority to combat the criminals. We suggested that the wildlife staff should be well equipped and knowledgeable, and have full authority to combat the criminals (illegal hunters and habitat destructors). Proactive measures can be taken to address potential hazards before they escalate into significant threats. Utilizing existing knowledge of suitable habitats in current and future can serve as a valuable guide for effective management. Our study findings revealed that the suitable overlap between the current and future predicted suitable habitat for Tragopan melanocephalus is primarily observed in the upper ridges of Waziristan, Upper Dir, and Chitral in Pakistan, as well as the northern region of Salkala and Jugran Valley in Kashmir. Consequently, we advised safeguarding these geographic centers of population connectedness in the future. The findings of this study suggest that a refined wildlife management strategy could significantly aid in the reintroduction of the Tragopan melanocephalus population in its western Himalayan suitable habitats, thus contributing to the global goals envisioned for the UN Decade (2021–2030) of Ecosystem Restoration targets.

5. Conclusions

This study emphasizes the significance of implementing conservation and habitat management strategies to safeguard endangered species, particularly the Tragopan melanocephalus located in the Himalayas’ western region. This species is a crucial indicator of the health of the western Himalayan region’s habitats and is threatened by habitat disturbance, hunting, and infrastructure development projects. This study used MaxEnt modeling to assess the species’ habitat suitability in varying climate scenarios in the western Himalayas and identified ten influential drivers. The study found that the habitat suitability of the Western Tragopan may increase under future climate change scenarios, but more research is necessary to prevent population collapses and identify other potential causes of local extinction events. The results can be used to create effective conservation plans for the species in a changing climate and serve as a basis for future monitoring of the species. Furthermore, the study provided field-based recommendations and implementation strategies to ensure the long-term survival of the targeted and other endangered species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.H.; Data collection, M.A.J. and A.S.; methodology, S.M.H., M.A.J., I.M. and A.S.; analysis, S.M.H.; investigations, M.A.J., S.M.H. and S.A.; original draft preparation, S.M.H.; reviewing and editing, S.M.H., R.A., M.A.J., I.M., R.W.B., A.-R.Z.G. and B.M.A.A.-M.; revision, S.M.H., R.A., supervision, M.S.N. and R.A., resources, funding acquisition A.-R.Z.G. and B.M.A.A.-M.; project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R686), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This publication contains all the available data.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2023R686), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pecl, G.T.; Araújo, M.B.; Bell, J.D.; Blanchard, J.; Bonebrake, T.C.; Chen, I.-C.; Clark, T.D.; Colwell, R.K.; Danielsen, F.; Evengård, B.; et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 2017, 355, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dawson, T.P.; Jackson, S.T.; House, J.I.; Prentice, I.C.; Mace, G.M. Beyond predictions: Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 2011, 332, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cowie, R.H.; Bouchet, P.; Fontaine, B. The Sixth Mass Extinction: Fact, fiction or speculation? Biol. Rev. 2022, 97, 640–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arora, N.K.; Mishra, I. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 2030 and environmental sustainability: Race against time. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 339–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Maxwell, S.L.; Cazalis, V.; Dudley, N.; Hoffmann, M.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Stolton, S.; Visconti, P.; Woodley, S.; Kingston, N.; Lewis, E.; et al. Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature 2020, 586, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haq, S.M.; Calixto, E.S.; Yaqoob, U.; Ahmed, R.; Mahmoud, A.H.; Bussmann, R.W.; Mohammed, O.B.; Ahmad, K.; Abbasi, A.M. Traditional usage of wild fauna among the local inhabitants of Ladakh, Trans-Himalayan Region. Animals 2020, 10, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Romero-Muñoz, A.; Benítez-López, A.; Zurell, D.; Baumann, M.; Camino, M.; Decarre, J.; del Castillo, H.; Giordano, A.J.; Gómez-Valencia, B.; Levers, C.; et al. Increasing synergistic effects of habitat destruction and hunting on mammals over three decades in the Gran Chaco. Ecography 2020, 43, 954–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jump, A.S.; Peñuelas, J. Running to stand still: Adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haq, S.M.; Waheed, M.; Ahmad, R.; Bussmann, R.W.; Arshad, F.; Khan, A.M.; Casini, R.; Alataway, A.; Dewidar, A.Z.; Elansary, H.O. Climate Change and Human Activities, the Significant Dynamic Drivers of Himalayan Goral Distribution (Naemorhedus goral). Biology 2023, 12, 610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tripathi, A.K.; Pandey, P.C.; Sharma, J.K.; Triantakonstantis, D.; Srivastava, P.K. Climate Change and Its Impact on Forest of Indian Himalayan Region: A Review. In Climate Change. Springer Climate; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lamprecht, A.; Pauli, H.; FernándezCalzado, M.R.; Lorite, J.; Molero Mesa, J.; Steinbauer, K.; Winkler, M. Changes in plant diversity in a water-limited and isolated high-mountain range (Sierra Nevada, Spain). Alp. Bot. 2021, 131, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bellard, C.; Bertelsmeier, C.; Leadley, P.; Thuiller, W.; Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 2012, 15, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Di Marco, M.; Harwood, T.D.; Hoskins, A.J.; Ware, C.; Hill, S.L.; Ferrier, S. Projecting impacts of global climate and land-use scenarios on plant biodiversity using compositional-turnover modelling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2763–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, C.; He, H.S.; Liang, Y.; Hawbaker, T.J.; Henne, P.D.; Xu, W.; Gong, P.; Zhu, Z. The changes in species composition mediate direct effects of climate change on future fire regimes of boreal forests in northeastern China. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schmeller, D.S.; Courchamp, F.; Killeen, G. Biodiversity loss, emerging pathogens and human health risks. Biodivers. Conserv. 2020, 29, 3095–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Prober, S.M.; Doerr, V.A.; Broadhurst, L.M.; Williams, K.J.; Dickson, F. Shifting the conservation paradigm: A synthesis of options for renovating nature under climate change. Ecol. Monogr. 2019, 89, 01333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Di Sacco, A.; Hardwick, K.A.; Blakesley, D.; Brancalion, P.H.; Breman, E.; CecilioRebola, L.; Chomba, S.; Dixon, K.; Elliott, S.; Ruyonga, G.; et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 1328–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Seddon, N.; Smith, A.; Smith, P.; Key, I.; Chausson, A.; Girardin, C.; House, J.; Srivastava, S.; Turner, B. Getting the message right on nature-based solutions to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 1518–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waheed, M.; Arshad, F.; Majeed, M.; Haq, S.M.; Aziz, R.; Bussmann, R.W.; Ali, K.; Subhan, F.; Jones, D.A.; Zaitouny, A. Potential distribution of a noxious weed (Solanum viarum Dunal), current status, and future invasion risk based on MaxEnt modeling. Geol. Ecol. Landsc. 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schroeder, B. Challenges of species distribution modeling belowground. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2008, 171, 325–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rather, Z.A.; Ahmad, R.; Khuroo, A.A. Ensemble modelling enables identification of suitable sites for habitat restoration of threatened biodiversity under climate change: A case study of Himalayan Trillium. Ecol. Eng. 2022, 176, 106534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Awan, M.N.; Buner, F.; Kingdon, N. A review of published and unpublished surveys of a red-listed ‘flagship species’, the Western Tragopan melanocephalus in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Bird Conserv. Int. 2016, 26, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shah, A.; Kayani, A.R.; Ihlow, F.; Nadeem, M.S.; Mahmood, T.; Islam, S.; Hausmann, A.E.; Päckert, M. Range-wide and regional distribution of the Western Tragopan melanocephalus and effects of disturbance on local abundances. Bird Conserv. Int. 2023, 33, e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jameel, M.A.; Nadeem, M.S.; Aslam, S.; Ullah, W.; Ahmad, D.; Awan, M.N.; Masroor, W.; Mahmood, T.; Ullah, R.; Anjum, M.Z.; et al. Impact of human imposed pressure on pheasants of western Himalayas, Pakistan: Implication for monitoring and conservation. Diversity 2022, 14, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Davis, A.E.; Gamble, R.; Roche, G.; Gawne, L. International relations and the Himalaya: Connecting ecologies, cultures and geopolitics. Aust. J. Int. Aff. 2021, 75, 15–35. Available online: https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20210121042564 (accessed on 4 April 2022). [CrossRef]
  26. Dimri, A.P.; Yasunari, T.; Wiltshire, A.; Kumar, P.; Mathison, C.; Ridley, J.; Jacob, D. Application of regional climate models to the Indian winter monsoon over the western Himalayas. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 468, S36–S47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Srivastava, R.K.; Srivastava, R.K. South Asia region and its urban agglomerates: The risk characterization. In Managing Urbanization, Climate Change and Disasters in South Asia; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 23–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hassan, M.; Haq, S.M.; Ahmad, R.; Majeed, M.; Sahito, H.A.; Shirani, M.; Mubeen, I.; Aziz, M.A.; Pieroni, A.; Bussmann, R.W.; et al. Traditional Use of Wild and Domestic Fauna among Different Ethnic Groups in the Western Himalayas—A Cross Cultural Analysis. Animals 2022, 12, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, X.; Liu, J.; Huang, Z. The impact of climate change on the distribution of rare and endangered tree Firmianakwangsiensis using the Maxent modeling. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, 9165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, L.; Dong, T.; Xu, W.; Ouyang, Z. Assessment of habitat fragmentation caused by traffic networks and identifying key affected areas to facilitate rare wildlife conservation in China. Wildl. Res. 2015, 42, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Arshad, F.; Waheed, M.; Fatima, K.; Harun, N.; Iqbal, M.; Fatima, K.; Umbreen, S. Predicting the suitable current and future potential distribution of the native endangered tree Tecomellaundulata (Sm.) Seem. in Pakistan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bosso, L.; Di Febbraro, M.; Cristinzio, G.; Zoina, A.; Russo, D. Shedding light on the effects of climate change on the potential distribution of Xylella fastidiosa in the Mediterranean Basin. Biol. Invasions 2016, 18, 1759–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hassan, T.; Hamid, M.; Wani, S.A.; Malik, A.H.; Waza, S.A.; Khuroo, A.A. Substantial shifts in flowering phenology of Sternbergiavernalis in the Himalaya: Supplementing decadal field records with historical and experimental evidences. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 795, 148811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hijmans, R.J.; Cameron, S.E.; Parra, J.L.; Jones, P.G.; Jarvis, A. Very high-resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 2005, 25, 1965–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Khattak, R.H.; Teng, L.; Ahmad, S.; Bari, F.; Rehman, E.U.; Shah, A.A.; Liu, Z. In pursuit of new spaces for threatened mammals: Assessing habitat suitability for Kashmir Markhor (Capra falconeri cashmeriensis) in the Hindukush Range. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yin, A.; Harrison, T.M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2000, 28, 211–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Graham, M.H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 2003, 84, 2809–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Eyring, V.; Cox, P.M.; Flato, G.M.; Gleckler, P.J.; Abramowitz, G.; Caldwell, P.; Collins, W.D.; Gier, B.K.; Hall, A.D.; Hoffman, F.M.; et al. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Awan, M.N.; Saqib, Z.; Buner, F.; Lee, D.C.; Pervez, A. Using ensemble modeling to predict breeding habitat of the red-listed Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) in the Western Himalayas of Pakistan. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 31, 01864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Phillips, S.J.; Anderson, R.P.; Schapire, R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 2006, 190, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Singh, H.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, M.; Singh, R. Modelling habitat suitability of western tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) a range-restricted vulnerable bird species of the Himalayan region, in response to climate change. Clim. Risk Manag. 2020, 29, 100241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bai, D.-F.; Chen, P.-J.; Atzeni, L.; Cering, L.; Li, Q.; Shi, K. Assessment of habitat Suitability of the Snow Leopard (Panthera uncia) in Qomolangma National Nature Reserve Based on MaxEnt Modeling. Zool. Res. 2018, 39, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fourcade, Y.; Engler, J.O.; Rödder, D.; Secondi, J. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias. PLoS ONE. 2014, 9, 97122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Merow, C.; Smith, M.J.; Silander, J.A., Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 2013, 36, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Elith, J.H.; Graham, C.P.; Anderson, R.; Dudík, M.; Ferrier, S.; Guisan, A.J.; Hijmans, R.; Huettmann, F.R.; Leathwick, J.; Lehmann, A. novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Summers, D.M.; Bryan, B.A.; Crossman, N.D.; Meyer, W.S. Species vulnerability to climate change: Impacts on spatial conservation priorities and species representation. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 2335–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Díaz, S.; Malhi, Y. Biodiversity: Concepts, patterns, trends, and perspectives. Ann. Rev. Env. Resour. 2022, 47, 31–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Haq, S.M.; Yaqoob, U.; Calixto, E.S.; Kumar, M.; Rahman, I.U.; Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alakeel, M.A.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Abdalla, M.; et al. Long-term impact of transhumance pastoralism and associated disturbances in high-altitude forests of Indian Western Himalaya. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Phillips, S.J.; Dudík, M.; Elith, J.; Graham, C.H.; Lehmann, A.; Leathwick, J.; Ferrier, S. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 2009, 19, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fielding, A.H.; Bell, J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 1997, 24, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ahmad, S.; Yang, L.; Khan, T.U.; Wanghe, K.; Li, M.; Luan, X. Using an ensemble modelling approach to predict the potential distribution of Himalayan gray goral (Naemorhedus goral bedfordi) in Pakistan. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 21, 00845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, D.; He, H.; Wang, W.; Wang, L.; Du, H.; Liu, K.; Zong, S. Predicting wetland distribution changes under climate change and human activities in a Mid- and High-Latitude Region. Sustainability 2018, 10, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hirzel, A.H.; Le Lay, G. Habitat Suitability Modelling and Niche Theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45, 1372–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jameel, M.A.; Khan, M.F.; Awan, M.N.; Nadeem, M.S.; Aslam, S.; Mehmood, S.; Ahmad, D.; Wali, R.; Rehman, Q.; Mahmood, T. Population and risk assessment of sympatric pheasant species in Palas Valley, Pakistan. Braz. J. Biol. 2022, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Haq, S.M.; Khuroo, A.A.; Malik, A.H.; Rashid, I.; Ahmad, R.; Hamid, M.; Dar, G.H. Forest ecosystems of Jammu and Kashmir state. In Biodiversity of the Himalaya: Jammu and Kashmir State; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Domíguez-Vega, H.; Monroy-Vilchis, O.; Balderas-Valdivia, C.J.; Gienger, C.M.; Ariano-Sánchez, D. Predicting the potential distribution of the beaded lizard and identification of priority areas for conservation. J. Nat. Conserv. 2012, 20, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Smeraldo, S.; Di Febbraro, M.; Ćirović, D.; Bosso, L.; Trbojević, I.; Russo, D. Species distribution models as a tool to predict range expansion after reintroduction: A case study on Eurasian beavers (Castor fiber). J. Nat. Conserv. 2017, 37, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Feeley, K.J.; Silman, M.R.; Bush, M.B.; Farfan, W.; Cabrera, K.G.; Malhi, Y.; Saatchi, S. Upslope migration of Andean trees. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Forero-Medina, G.; Terborgh, J.; Socolar, S.J.; Pimm, S.L. Elevational ranges of birds on a tropical montane gradient lag behind warming temperatures. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, 28535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Zuckerberg, B.; Woods, A.M.; Porter, W.F. Poleward shifts in breeding bird distributions in New York State. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15, 1866–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chhatre, A.; Saberwal, V. Democracy, development and (Re-) visions of nature: Rural conflicts in the western Himalayas. J. Peasant. Stud. 2006, 33, 678–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Inskipp, C.; Baral, H.S.; Inskipp, T.; Khatiwada, A.P.; Khatiwada, M.P.; Poudyal, L.P.; Amin, R. Nepal’s National Red List of Birds. J. Threat. Taxa 2017, 9, 9700–9722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Quintero, I.; Wiens, J.J. Rates of projected climate change dramatically exceed past rates of climatic niche evolution among vertebrate species. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Warren, D.L.; Glor, R.E.; Turelli, M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution: Int. J. Org. Evol. 2008, 62, 2868–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Schweizer, M.; Liu, Y. Avian diversity and distributions and their evolution through space and time. Bird Species: How They Arise, Modify and Vanish. Life Sci. 2018, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Muñoz-Mendoza, C.; D’Elía, G.; Panzera, A.; Villalobos-Leiva, A.; Sites, J.W., Jr.; Victoriano, P.F. Geography and past climate changes have shaped the evolution of a widespread lizard from the Chilean hotspot. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2017, 116, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Walther, G.R.; Post, E.; Convey, P.; Menzel, A.; Parmesan, C.; Beebee, T.J.; Fromentin, J.M.; Hoegh-Guldberg, O.; Bairlein, F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Foden, W.B.; Butchart, S.H.; Stuart, S.N.; Vié, J.C.; Akçakaya, H.R.; Angulo, A.; Mace, G.M. Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: A systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, 65427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Abolmaali, S.M.R.; Tarkesh, M.; Bashari, H. MaxEnt modeling for predicting suitable habitats and identifying the effects of climate change on a threatened species, Daphne mucronata, in central Iran. Ecol. Inf. 2018, 43, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khanum, R.; Mumtaz, A.S.; Kumar, S. Predicting impacts of climate change on medicinal asclepiads of Pakistan using Maxent modeling. Acta Oecol. 2013, 49, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, B.; Liang, C.; Song, P.; Liu, D.; Qin, W.; Jiang, F.; Zhang, T. Threatened birds face new distribution under future climate change on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP). Ecol. Indic. 2023, 150, 110217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kadmon, R.; Farber, O.; Danin, A. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. Ecol. Appl. 2004, 14, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Segurado, P.; Araujo, M.B.; Kunin, W.E. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43, 433–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hooper, D.U.; Adair, E.C.; Cardinale, B.J.; Byrnes, J.E.K.; Hungate, B.A.; Matulich, K.L.; Gonzalez, A.; Duffy, J.E.; Gamfeldt, L.; Connor, M.I. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 2012, 486, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jameel, M.A.; Tabassum, S.; Mehmood, S.; Shah, T.; Khan, M.F.; Kabir, M.; Awan, M.N. Does Trophy Hunting of Kashmir Markhor Really Contributing in Its Conservation? Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2019, 10, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yamaura, Y.; Higa, M.; Senzaki, M.; Koizumi, I. Can charismatic megafauna be surrogate species for biodiversity conservation? Mechanisms and a test using citizen data and a hierarchical community model. In Biodiversity Conservation Using Umbrella Species: Blakiston’s Fish Owl and the Red-Crowned Crane; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 151–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rahman, Q.; Nadeem, M.S.; Umair, M.; Altaf, M.; Ni, J.; Abbasi, A.M.; Jameel, M.A.; Pieroni, A.; Hamed, M.H.; Ashraf, S.; et al. Medicinal water birds in the traditional healthcare system: An assessment of biodiversity–cultural linkages in Eastern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 2022, 18, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tietze, D.T. Bird Species: How They Arise, Modify and Vanish; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Available online: http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/22941 (accessed on 4 April 2022).
Biology 12 01015 g001 550
Figure 1. Digital elevation modeling (DEM) of the study area in the Western Himalayas in South Asia.
Figure 1. Digital elevation modeling (DEM) of the study area in the Western Himalayas in South Asia.
Biology 12 01015 g001
Biology 12 01015 g002 550
Figure 2. Photographs during our field surveys depicting (a) the natural environment of Tragopan melanocephalus, (b) a female western Tragopan in its ecological zone, (c) a male Tragopan melanocephalus that had been hunted by hunters in Palas valley, and (d) an extensive infrastructure development project located deep inside the species’ natural habitat.
Figure 2. Photographs during our field surveys depicting (a) the natural environment of Tragopan melanocephalus, (b) a female western Tragopan in its ecological zone, (c) a male Tragopan melanocephalus that had been hunted by hunters in Palas valley, and (d) an extensive infrastructure development project located deep inside the species’ natural habitat.
Biology 12 01015 g002
Biology 12 01015 g003 550
Figure 3. A heat map of Pearson correlations displaying the pairwise correlations (with a threshold of r = ±0.8) between the climatic and biophysical variables used in the distribution modeling of the Tragopan melanocephalus.
Figure 3. A heat map of Pearson correlations displaying the pairwise correlations (with a threshold of r = ±0.8) between the climatic and biophysical variables used in the distribution modeling of the Tragopan melanocephalus.
Biology 12 01015 g003
Biology 12 01015 g004 550
Figure 4. ROC prediction using the MaxEnt model. The model’s precision was 0.992.
Figure 4. ROC prediction using the MaxEnt model. The model’s precision was 0.992.
Biology 12 01015 g004
Biology 12 01015 g005 550
Figure 5. MaxEnt Modeling of Tragopan Melanocephalus: Evaluating the Predictive Power of Environmental Variables using Jackknife Regularized Training Gain.
Figure 5. MaxEnt Modeling of Tragopan Melanocephalus: Evaluating the Predictive Power of Environmental Variables using Jackknife Regularized Training Gain.
Biology 12 01015 g005
Biology 12 01015 g006 550
Figure 6. Variable Response Curves (ROC) of the Distribution of Tragopan Melanocephalus: Analysis of Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Human Footprint (HFP), and Key Climatic Factors (Bio14, Bio17, Bio19, Bio07).
Figure 6. Variable Response Curves (ROC) of the Distribution of Tragopan Melanocephalus: Analysis of Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Human Footprint (HFP), and Key Climatic Factors (Bio14, Bio17, Bio19, Bio07).
Biology 12 01015 g006
Biology 12 01015 g007 550
Figure 7. The response curve of highly contributed variable in the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus. Annual precipitation (bio12), aspect, temperature seasonality (bio04), and mean diurnal range (bio02).
Figure 7. The response curve of highly contributed variable in the distribution of Tragopan melanocephalus. Annual precipitation (bio12), aspect, temperature seasonality (bio04), and mean diurnal range (bio02).
Biology 12 01015 g007
Biology 12 01015 g008 550
Figure 8. MaxEnt prediction map of Tragopan melanocephalus’ possible habitat suitability classification in the study region under current climatic conditions (the 1970s–2000s).
Figure 8. MaxEnt prediction map of Tragopan melanocephalus’ possible habitat suitability classification in the study region under current climatic conditions (the 1970s–2000s).
Biology 12 01015 g008
Biology 12 01015 g009 550
Figure 9. Maps generated by MaxEnt demonstrate the predicted habitat suitability classes under different future climate change scenarios. (A): SSPs-245 in the 2050s. (B): SSPs-585 in the 2070s. (C): SSPs-245 in the 2070s. (D): SSPs-585 in the 2070s.
Figure 9. Maps generated by MaxEnt demonstrate the predicted habitat suitability classes under different future climate change scenarios. (A): SSPs-245 in the 2050s. (B): SSPs-585 in the 2070s. (C): SSPs-245 in the 2070s. (D): SSPs-585 in the 2070s.
Biology 12 01015 g009
Table
Table 1. The environmental predictors used in the MaxEnt species distribution model (SDM) for Tragopan melanocephalus in the study area were as follows:
Table 1. The environmental predictors used in the MaxEnt species distribution model (SDM) for Tragopan melanocephalus in the study area were as follows:
DataName of Variable & DescriptionCodeResolutionDatabase
Climatic VariablesAnnual Mean TemperatureBio130 arc sWorldClim
Mean Diurnal RangeBio230 arc sWorldClim
Temperature Seasonality (sd ×100)Bio430 arc sWorldClim
Isothermality (Bio2/Bio7) (×100)Bio330 arc sWorldClim
Mean Temperature of Wettest QuarterBio830 arc sWorldClim
Mean Temperature of Driest QuarterBio930 arc sWorldClim
Mean Temperature of Warmest QuarterBio1030 arc sWorldClim
Mean Temperature of Coldest QuarterBio1130 arc sWorldClim
Temperature Annual RangeBio730 arc sWorldClim
Max. Temperature of Warmest MonthBio530 arc sWorldClim
Min. Temperature of Coldest MonthBio630 arc sWorldClim
Annual PrecipitationBio1230 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Wettest MonthBio1330 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Driest MonthBio1430 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Wettest QuarterBio1630 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Driest QuarterBio1730 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation Seasonality (CV)Bio1530 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Warmest QuarterBio1830 arc sWorldClim
Precipitation of Coldest QuarterBio1930 arc sWorldClim
VegetationEnhanced Vegetation IndexEVI30 arc sModerate Resolution
Imaging Spectroradiometer
MODIS/Terr
Topographical
Variables		ElevationElev30 arc sSRTM DEM Global
Aspect Aspect30 arc sSRTM DEM Global
SlopeSlope30 arc sSRTM DEM Global
Anthropogenic
Variables		Human footprint HFP30 arc shttp://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu (accessed on 2 June 2023)
Road proximityRP30 arc shttp://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu (accessed on 2 June 2023)
Land coverLC30 arc shttp://www-modis.bu.edu/landcover (accessed on 2 June 2023)
Population densityPD30 arc shttp://www.ornl.gov/sci/landscan (accessed on 2 June 2023)
Table
Table 2. Following initial data preprocessing, a subset of environmental, topographic, and anthropogenic variables was selected and evaluated for their respective contributions toward shaping ecological patterns.
Table 2. Following initial data preprocessing, a subset of environmental, topographic, and anthropogenic variables was selected and evaluated for their respective contributions toward shaping ecological patterns.
DescriptionCodePercent Contribution
AspectAspect36.5
Precipitation of Coldest QuarterBio1934.7
Mean Diurnal RangeBio0213.3
Enhanced Vegetation IndexEvi7.6
Precipitation of Driest MonthBio145.2
Temperature Seasonality (sd × 100)Bio041.7
Annual PrecipitationBio120.4
Human FootprintHfp0.4
Precipitation of Driest QuarterBio170.1
Temperature Annual RangeBio070.1
Table
Table 3. Expected probability of Western Tragopan habitat suitability under various climate change scenarios.
Table 3. Expected probability of Western Tragopan habitat suitability under various climate change scenarios.
Climate Change
Scenario		The Probability of Western Tragopan Occurrence within the Selected Habitat Suitability Categories Has Been Estimated
Not-Suitable
(NS)		Least
(LS)		Moderate
(MS)		High
(HS)		Very-High
(VHS)		Total Suitable Land Area (km2)
(p ≤ 0.2)(p 0.21–0.4)(p 0.41–0.6)(p 0.61–0.8)(p ≥ 0.81)
Current climate434,73416,33418,27615,387948959,486
SSPs_245_2050446,86312,77813,77812,963783847,357
Rate of change (%)2.45−0.72−0.91−0.49−0.33−2.45
SSPs_585_2050453,17511,23412,42211,233615641,045
Rate of change (%)3.7−1.0−1.2−0.8−0.7−3.7
SSPs_245_2070449,34612,34514,26711,995626744,874
Rate of change (%)2.96−0.81−0.81−0.69−0.65−2.96
SSPs_585_2070460,4309027913810,267535833,790
Rate of change (%)5.20−1.48−1.85−1.04−0.84−5.20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jameel, M.A.; Nadeem, M.S.; Haq, S.M.; Mubeen, I.; Shabbir, A.; Aslam, S.; Ahmad, R.; Gaafar, A.-R.Z.; Al-Munqedhi, B.M.A.; Bussmann, R.W. Shifts in the Distribution Range and Niche Dynamics of the Globally Threatened Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) Due to Climate Change and Human Population Pressure. Biology 2023, 12, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071015

AMA Style

Jameel MA, Nadeem MS, Haq SM, Mubeen I, Shabbir A, Aslam S, Ahmad R, Gaafar A-RZ, Al-Munqedhi BMA, Bussmann RW. Shifts in the Distribution Range and Niche Dynamics of the Globally Threatened Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) Due to Climate Change and Human Population Pressure. Biology. 2023; 12(7):1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jameel, Muhammad Azhar, Muhammad Sajid Nadeem, Shiekh Marifatul Haq, Iqra Mubeen, Arifa Shabbir, Shahzad Aslam, Riyaz Ahmad, Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar, Bander M. A. Al-Munqedhi, and Rainer W. Bussmann. 2023. "Shifts in the Distribution Range and Niche Dynamics of the Globally Threatened Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) Due to Climate Change and Human Population Pressure" Biology 12, no. 7: 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071015

APA Style

Jameel, M. A., Nadeem, M. S., Haq, S. M., Mubeen, I., Shabbir, A., Aslam, S., Ahmad, R., Gaafar, A. -R. Z., Al-Munqedhi, B. M. A., & Bussmann, R. W. (2023). Shifts in the Distribution Range and Niche Dynamics of the Globally Threatened Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) Due to Climate Change and Human Population Pressure. Biology, 12(7), 1015. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12071015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop