You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Coatings
  • Article
  • Open Access

3 October 2019

Effect of Compaction and Hydraulic Gradient on Subbase Layer Permeability

and
1
Road Research Laboratory, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
2
Road Research Institute of Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Linkmenų str. 28, LT-08217 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Collection Pavement Surface Coatings

Abstract

In order to prevent or at least reduce the deformation of road surface, it is necessary to ensure adequate water permeability of the structural layers and control of groundwater level. In geotechnical engineering, the water permeability of the mineral aggregates or soils is determined using a constant head water permeability apparatus. In order to assess the suitability of the results, it is necessary to take into account particle size distribution of the test object and perform the test at different hydraulic ramps. The aim of this research is to define and clarify unbound mineral aggregate mixtures hydraulic gradient and compaction level of road layer impact on water permeability. The following properties have been determined during the tests: particle size distribution, particle density, Proctor density, optimum water quantity, water permeability under different compaction and hydraulic slopes. Based on the results of the research, low-dustiness non-bonded mineral materials are recommended for frost resistant layers. For the water-permeability coefficient test, it is recommended that the test layer should be compacted to a design compaction ratio and the hydraulic gradient should not be higher than 1.0. Other conclusions and recommendations for further research and for improvement of water permeability functionality in the road pavement are presented.

1. Introduction

When designing a road pavement structure, it is important to evaluate the maximum permissible vertical tension on the surfaces of the unbound base and subgrade layers by reducing the permissible deformations. It has been recognized that the performance of flexible and rigid pavements is also closely related to the characteristics of unbound layers and subgrade. For example, total rutting in flexible pavements is marginally sensitive to resilient modulus and soil water characteristic curve of unbound layers and subgrade, but non-sensitive to thickness of unbound layers and load-related cracking in flexible pavements marginally sensitive to soil water characteristic curve of subgrade [1].
The main functional parameters (tension and deformation) of the non-rigid pavement constructions are highly dependent on the properties of cold-resistant layers and subgrade soil. A large part of the pavement surface deformations are conditioned by inadequate subgrade layer and its bearing capacity due to excessive water content. Raised groundwater level increases both the resilient and the permanent strains in all unbound layers above groundwater level in the pavement structure [2]. Therefore, it is very important that the subgrade would be protected from irrigation from the pavement structure and from the groundwater. For this purpose, the groundwater level should be lowered by assuring required elevation of road structure, the transverse profile of the subgrade surface should be sufficient, the permeability of the unbound base layers, which is determined by many circumstances [3], by using frost non-susceptible soils should be ensured and drainage or insulating layers should be installed [4].
When designing road constructions, the deformation modules of subgrade and unbound layers are one of the main input data. However, most structural design programs that use mechanical-empirical calculations do not evaluate the potential change in layer properties in the horizontal direction. For this reason, the addition of subgrade soils in the calculations should take account into the changes of properties. High stress amplitudes cause the layer sedimentation and reduction of bearing capacity. Soils, having bad cohesion parameters, have nonlinear and non-elastic properties.
The subbase course is generally located on the bottom of base course and laid on the top of subgrade, which plays a role of spreading the load over the subgrade. However, the subbase course is usually not used unless heavy traffic is involved, or the subgrade is weak. In fact, the subbase courses usually are typically studied together with the base course, therefore, the influence of subbase course on pavement performance is correspondingly slight compared to the base course, especially for the inherent mechanism [5]. The functionality of unbound layers, exclusively for the protective frost-resistant layer, depends on the following components: material type and type (particle size distribution) for the application of the deposited layer, material origin, contamination (fines less than 0.63 mm), compaction grade, layer thickness, hydraulic slope in this layer.

3. Generally Accepted Principles for Testing Water Permeability of Road Pavement Structures

Water, having both kinetic and potential energy, flows through porous layers of material from one point to another, where this energy will already be lower [12]. The kinetic energy depends on the speed of the fluid, but the potential energy depends on the properties of the material or layer, their position and the pressure of the liquid. When water moves between two points, a certain amount of energy is lost, pressure is reduced.
From the experiment shown in Figure 2, the Bernoulli energy equilibrium equation between points A and B is expressed:
u A ρ w g + v A 2 2 g + z A = u B ρ w g + v B 2 2 g + z B + h
where u and v are the liquid pressure and velocity respectively, z is the distance from the zero line and ∆h is the pressure change between points A and B, which creates the flow.
Figure 2. Head loss as water flows through a porous media [7].
Since the velocity of water in the porous material is low, they can be rejected. The pressure difference can then be expressed as:
h = ( u A ρ w g + z A ) ( u B ρ w g + z B )
Darcy’s law states that water permeability (also known as hydraulic permeability) is a change in pressure across a body of a certain length:
v = K h L
or taking into account the very small size of the elements:
v = K d h d L = K i
where dh is the change in pressure of infinitely small elements at an extremely low distance dL, and i is the hydraulic pressure of the flow in the flow direction. This equality is known as the Darcy’s law and defines the water permeability of soils and mineral materials.
Taking into account the formula 2, it can be seen that better water permeability properties exist when:
  • the cross-sectional area through which water flows is increased: this increases the number of air voids;
  • hydraulic pressure is increased: it can be performed by installing deeper drains or better drainage systems;
  • water permeability is increased, when coarser mineral material selected that creates more air voids in the layer for a water-permeable layer.
However, Darcy’s law only applies to laminar, irrational water flow in porous bodies. In the saturated layers, the water permeability coefficient can be considered constant throughout the layer skeleton, by rejecting the formation of water vortex which is minimal. Above groundwater levels in unsaturated layers, the Darcy law also applies, only water permeability becoming a function of water content.
  • Unbound mineral material layers’ water permeability is dependent on the following factors:
  • particle size distribution;
  • number of air voids;
  • structures and textures of soil or mineral material;
  • density of soil or mineral material;
  • water temperature [12].
For this reason, several empirical equations for water permeability have been proposed in the past. These equations include parameters that are directly related to the material’s particle size distribution or its air void content.

4. Water Permeability Test

Traditionally, in geotechnical engineering, the water permeability of the saturated material for coarse-grained and multi-grained soils and mineral materials is determined using a constant-pressure water permeability coefficient equipment and for fine-grained soils—a variable pressure equipment. For the constant-pressure water permeability test, sample is placed in a container that has water permeable filters, but does not change skeleton of the mineral material or soil (see Figure 3). A constant pressure water flow is then allowed into this vessel, which passes through the entire volume of the sample. During the test, the amount of water passed is determined over a period of time.
Figure 3. Scheme of constant head permeability test.
After reconfiguring and replacing certain indexes in formula 5, the water permeability coefficient is equal to:
q = k Q A h L
where A is the area of the cross-section of the vessel through which the liquid passes through a period of time with hydraulic slope ∆h/∆L, where the hydraulic slope is the difference in hydraulic pressure ∆h at a distance ∆L, and k is a constant indicating the hydraulic permeability and depends on the type of the substance to be examined, its porosity, and the characteristics of the filtered liquid, especially its viscosity.
Usually, the Darsi flow estimates the water permeability regime in the soil or mineral material layers when the water reaches the boundary speeds and does not create vortex when water flows from small to larger air voids. This means that energy losses are only due to friction between the water and the surrounding particles, so the water permeability ratio can be determined. When the water permeability of coarse-grained materials with high air voids is determined by the equipment shown in Figure 3, it must be ensured that the Darcy law conditions are met.
During the tests, standard conditions are accepted, one of which is hydraulic gradient. This condition is accepted at a much higher value than the options available in nature, for assurance of critical conditions on roads. If hydraulic slopes of this size are given to materials with high air voids, the vortexes may form in air voids, resulting in more energy being lost than provided by the Darcy flow. If the designer or researcher is unfamiliar with these conditions, the value of the water permeability coefficient will not be assessed adequately or correctly.
For this reason, tests should be carried out on different hydraulic slopes for coarse-grained and multi-grained soils and mineral materials. The required hydraulic gradient may be less than 0.1 to implement the Darcy law [13] as shown in Figure 4 [14].
Figure 4. Limits of applicability of Darcy assumptions when testing at variable hydraulic gradients [14].

5. Test Object and Methods

According to the practice, unbound mineral material fraction 0/4 is most often used to install a frost-resistant protective layer. This is usually a mixture of screened non-washed sand from quarries. In order to evaluate the quality of this mixture, tests also performed on washed sand fraction 0/4. These test objects (screened non-washed and washed sands) were taken from 3 different quarries with 7 different specimens for each test object.
Experimental laboratory testing consists of the following steps:
  • Investigation of the properties of mineral mixtures;
  • determination of properties of mineral materials as a frost-resistant layer;
  • research and analysis of water permeability.
The following properties have been determined for unbound mineral mixtures:
  • Particle size distribution according to European Standard EN 933-1 [15];
  • particle density according to European Standard EN 1097-6 [16].
With every specimen, 3 mentioned tests were made.
The following properties have been determined for unbound mineral materials as a frost resistant layer:
  • Proctor compaction and reference density according to European Standard EN 13286-2 [17];
  • reference water content according to European Standard EN 13286-2 [17];
  • air voids according to European Standard EN 13286-2 [17].
With every specimen, 3 mentioned tests were made.
The water permeability values for the test objects during the water permeability test according to Technical Specification ISO/TS 17892-11 were:
  • Standard conditions [6];
  • with different compaction values (100.0%; 103.0%);
  • different water hydraulic pressures.
With every mentioned condition, 5 tests were made with every specimen.

6. Results

Water permeability test results shows that the values of the washed sand are 3 times the value of the non-washed sand when the compaction rate is optimal; when the compaction rate is 103%, the value of the washed sand water permeability coefficient are 7 times the value of the non-washed sand. The results show that a 2% increase in mineral dust in the mixture has a significant impact on water permeability. Small particles affected by water fill the free air voids. This way the water flow is blocked, and the water permeability coefficient decreases.
Depending on the compaction, the value of the permeability water coefficient decreases with more compaction. It was found that the more compacted washed sand layers’ water permeability value drops to 33%. Meanwhile, the water permeability coefficient of the screened non-washed sand layer falls by 60%. From this it can be stated that smaller fraction sands are more sensitive to compaction if attention is paid to the functionality of water permeability. Compacting smaller fraction sands have better properties for greater compaction due to the ability of fine mineral particles to move into the voids of the empty air.
During the test according to CEN ISO / TS 17892-11: 2004 clause 4.3, it was found that, under identical test conditions and sand compacting, but with different hydraulic gradients, different results are obtained: the difference between the results of the same sample under the same conditions may vary up to 14.0% depending on the hydraulic gradient.
From Figure 5, it can be seen that the water permeability values do not correlate with the hydraulic gradient. Depending on the different materials and their different compaction, different dependencies are obtained: Dependence of the washed sand on the hydraulic gradient, when the degree of compaction is optimal, with the increasing hydraulic slope, the value of the water permeability decreases; with the average hydraulic gradient value of the water permeability increases and with the high hydraulic gradient the value decreases again. With a compaction of 103%, the increase in the hydraulic gradient results in a decrease of the value of water permeability, but it increases when hydraulic gradient is ≥0.10. The dependence of the screened non-washed sand water permeability coefficient on the hydraulic gradient when the degree of compaction is optimal is similar to washed sand, but the differences in values are much smaller: the values are rounded to the required accuracy, the results are almost identical. With 103% compaction, the value of water permeability of the screened non-washed sand increases as the hydraulic gradient increases; only with extremely high hydraulic gradient ≥0.17, these values decrease again.
Figure 5. Water permeability coefficient value correlation with different the hydraulic gradient during test.
Considering variations in water permeability results, the highest variation in different hydraulic gradients was observed with more compacted mineral mixtures: screened non-washed sand compacted at 103% water permeability coefficient values doubled when the value of washed sand compacted at 100% decreased to 15%. Although the differences in results are not significant, the values of the different hydraulic gradients cannot be evaluated as a suitable factor for water permeability.
Based on the obtained results, it has been found to be particularly important to select suitable hydraulic gradient value for the water permeability test. It is important that the Darcy law is implemented: The flow rate of the spilled water must be linearly dependent on the value of the hydraulic gradient. This condition has been verified and an example of the results obtained is shown in Figure 6. With a large hydraulic slope, dependence becomes not linear, but the logarithmic—Darcy’s law is no longer valid. According to the results of the washed sand, it can be stated that the Darcy law is valid up to value of 1.0 of the hydraulic slope. The same dependency applies to different degrees of compaction.
Figure 6. Dependency of flow rate of the spilled water through washed sand with optimal compaction on the different hydraulic gradients.
During the tests, it was found that different values of water permeability coefficient were calculated taking into account the amount of water passed through the sample at different stages of the test by measuring in accordance to CEN ISO / TS 17892-11: 2004 clause 4.3. The distribution of the values of the water permeability coefficients from the mean values, taking into account the stage when the data for the calculation of this coefficient were recorded, is graphically represented in Figure 7. The results show that at the beginning of the test, the first time recording has the highest deviation from the mean values. Calculating the standard deviation σ of the mean of all water permeability coefficient deviations from the mean coefficient values, with a confidence interval of 95%, is 1.67 × 10−7 m/s. Almost all values not within the 2σ range of 2 standard deviations are measured during the first test phase: when the first 100 mL of passing water is measured. This may be due to operator error or test equipment sensitivity.
Figure 7. The distribution of the values of the water permeability coefficients from the mean values, taking into account the stage when the data for the calculation of this coefficient were recorded.

7. Conclusions

The basic functional parameters of road structure are highly dependent on the characteristics of the base and soil layers. For this purpose, the groundwater abasement must be ensured, a sufficient slope of the subgrade and the water permeability of the non-bonded structure layers, which is determined by many factors.
Low-fine content sand, which has 1.0% particles smaller than 0.063 mm has a 3 times bigger water-permeability coefficient than the sand containing 3.0% particles smaller than 0.063 mm at 100% compaction; at 103% compaction; the low-contamination mineral material has a water-permeability coefficient of 7 times bigger than the one having higher contamination.
It is recommended to evaluate the possibility of reducing water permeability control at the construction site when the design compaction ratio is reached and when there is a small amount of fines in mineral material of frost resistant layer—percentage of passage through a 0.063 mm sieve ≤ 3%.
In the standard CEN ISO/TS 17892-11: 2004 for defining water permeability coefficient test, several key parameters (sample density during test and hydraulic gradient) are not defined.
During the test the influence of the hydraulic gradient on the water permeability coefficient is negligible when hydraulic gradient is up to 1.0; such conditions correspond to the law of Darcy based on Bernoulli’s equation.
It is recommended to use as low as possible low-dustiness non-bonded mineral materials for frost resistant layers, and for the water-permeability coefficient test, it is recommended that the test layer should be compacted to a design compaction ratio, hydraulic gradient should not be higher than 1.0 and the time value for the first collected water volume measurement should be rejected, thus increasing the accuracy of the results.
In order to confirm research finding suitability for wide particle size distribution aggregates mixtures or soils we recommend to test samples of 0/16, 0/22 fractions. It is also recommended that studies be carried out to assess the effect of fines (less than 0.063 mm) on water permeability in mineral blends of fr. 0/16 fr. 0/22, fr. 0/32.

Author Contributions

Supervision, A.V.; Writing–Original Draft, V.F.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Luo, X.; Gu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Lytton, R.L.; Zollinger, D. Mechanistic-empirical models for better consideration of subgrade and unbound layers’ influence on pavement performance. Transp. Geotech. 2017, 13, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Erlingsson, S. Impact of water on the response and performance of a pavement structure in an accelerated test. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2010, 11, 863–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thompson, M.R.; Tutumluer, E.; Bejarano, M. Granular Material and Soil Moduli: Review of the Literature; ARRB: Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vaitkus, A.; Vorobjovas, V.; Žiliutė, L.; Kleizienė, R.; Ratkevičius, T. Optimal selection of soils and aggregates mixtures for a frost blanket course of road pavement structure. Balt. J. Road Bridge Eng. 2012, 7, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, N.; Xiao, F.; Wang, J.; Amirkhanian, S. Characterizations of base and subbase layers for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 731–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. ISO/TS 17892-11:2004 Geotechnical Investigation and Testting-Laboratory Testing of Soil-Part 11: Determination of Permeability by Constant and Falling Head; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
  7. Araya, A.A. Characterization of Unbound Granular Materials for Pavements. Ph.D. Thesis, IHE/TUDelft: Delft, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Werkmeister, S. Permanent Deformation Behaviour of Unbound Granular Materials in Pavement Constructions; Plastisches Verformungsverhalten von Tragschichten ohne Bindemittel in Straßenbefestigungen. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany, 7 April 2003; 189p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Saevarsdottir, T.; Erlingsson, S. Effect of moisture content on pavement behaviour in a heavy vehicle simulator test. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2013, 14, 274–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, D.; Chen, Z.; Ling, J. Performance-dependent Humidity State Division of Subgrade in Seasonal Frozen Region. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 25, 2182–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rasul, M.; Ghataora, G.; Burrow, M. The effect of wetting and drying on the performance of stabilized subgrade soils. Transp. Geotech. 2018, 14, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cedergren, H.R. Drainage of Highway and Airfield Pavements; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1974; p. 285. [Google Scholar]
  13. Folkeson, L.; Swedish, N.R. Water in Road Structures; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2009; ISSN: 9781402085628. [Google Scholar]
  14. Filotenkovas, V.; Vaitkus, A. Assessment of Factors Determining Water Permeability of Base Layers in Pavement Structure on Traffic Zones. Sci. Future Lith. 2018, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. EN 933-1:2012 Tests for Geometrical Properties of Aggregates-Part 1: Determination of Particle Size Distribution-Sieving Method; BSI: Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
  16. EN 1097-6:2013 Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates-Part 6: Determination of Particle Density and Water Absorption; BSI: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
  17. EN 13286-2:2010/AC:2013 Unbound and Hydraulically Bound Mixtures-Part 2: Test Methods for Laboratory Reference Density and Water Content-Proctor Compaction; BSI: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.