Next Article in Journal
Diagnostic Methods of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Clostridioides difficile Ribotypes in Studied Sample
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin Cefiderocol against Acinetobacter baumannii Strains Recovered from Clinical Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotics Used in Empiric Treatment of Ocular Infections Trigger the Bacterial Rcs Stress Response System Independent of Antibiotic Susceptibility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Direct Testing for KPC-Mediated Carbapenem Resistance from Blood Samples Using a T2 Magnetic Resonance Based Assay
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/antibiotics10091034
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heteroaryl-Ethylenes as New Lead Compounds in the Fight against High Priority Bacterial Strains

by
Dafne Bongiorno
1,*,†,
Nicolò Musso
1,†,
Paolo G. Bonacci
2,
Dalida A. Bivona
1,
Mariacristina Massimino
1,
Stefano Stracquadanio
1,
Carmela Bonaccorso
2,*,
Cosimo G. Fortuna
2 and
Stefania Stefani
1
1
Section of Microbiology, Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences (BIMETEC), University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(9), 1034; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091034
Submission received: 28 July 2021 / Revised: 19 August 2021 / Accepted: 20 August 2021 / Published: 25 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Antimicrobial Options in the Clinical Practice of Infections Caused by Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens: A Global Opportunity for Public Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The widespread use of antibiotics has led to a gradual increase in drug-resistant bacterial infections, which severely weakens the clinical efficacy of antibacterial therapies. In recent decades, stilbenes aroused great interest because of their high bioavailability, as well as their manifold biological activity. Our research efforts are focused on synthetic heteroaromatic stilbene derivatives as they represent a potentially new type of antibiotic with a wide antibacterial spectrum. Herein, a preliminary molecular modeling study and a versatile synthetic scheme allowed us to define eight heteroaromatic stilbene derivatives with potential antimicrobial activity. In order to evaluate our compound’s activity spectrum and antibacterial ability, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) tests have been performed on Gram-positive and Gram-negative ATCC strains. Compounds PB4, PB5, PB7, and PB8 showed the best values in terms of MIC and were also evaluated for MBC, which was found to be greater than MIC, confirming a bacteriostatic activity. For all compounds, we evaluated toxicity on colon-rectal adenocarcinoma cells tumor cells (CaCo2), once it was established that the whole selected set was more active than 5-Fluorouracil in reducing CaCo-2 cells viability. To the best of our knowledge, the biological assays have shown for these derivatives an excellent bacteriostatic activity, compared to similar molecular structures previously reported, thus paving the way for a new class of antibiotic compounds.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a matter of concern for the public authorities in both developed and emerging countries. To guide the research and development of new and effective antibiotic treatments, the WHO has developed in 2017 a global priority pathogens list (global PPL) of antibiotic-resistant bacteria [1]. Amongst the Gram-positive species, Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant-MRSA, vancomycin intermediate- hVISA and VISA, and resistant-VRSA) and Enterococcus spp. (vancomycin-resistant or VRE) were classified as high priority. Amongst Gram-negative species, those of greatest interest are Escherichia coli resistant to cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides; Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to carbapenem and fluoroquinolones; Peudomonas aeruginosa with combined resistance (resistance to piperacillin ± tazobactam, ceftazidime, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and carbapenems) and carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC).
It is crucial to remember the importance of antibiotics research for modern medicine to counter the growing threat posed by AMR. With the continuous rise of difficult-to-treat pathogens and related infectious diseases, the development of new strategies [2,3,4] and improved effective therapeutics, including antibiotics and their combinations, are urgently needed [5,6,7,8].
The 2015–2019 report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) [9] indicates that AMR is highly variable depending on bacterial species, antimicrobial group, and geographical region. Although a high level of resistance is still observed, variations were moderate for most Gram-negative bacterial species. Moreover, even if MRSA rates are stabilizing or decreasing in most European countries, S. aureus remains an important pathogen as it is one of the most common causes of bloodstream infections, with a high burden in terms of morbidity and mortality [10,11]. Enterococcus spp. are commensal in the human gastrointestinal tract. E. faecium and E. faecalis can cause a variety of infections, such as urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and endocarditis. They are intrinsically resistant to a broad range of antimicrobial agents (i.e., cephalosporins and sulphonamides) and showed low susceptibility to beta-lactams. They can acquire genes conferring high-level resistance to aminoglycosides. Finally, the increase of glycopeptide resistance is of increasing clinical relevance. Glycopeptide resistance is mediated by the VanA gene that conferred high level resistance to vancomycin and a variable level of resistance to teicoplanin, and VanB, that conferred a variable level of resistance to vancomycin [12]. E. coli is part of the normal intestinal microbiota and is a common cause of severe infections such as bloodstream and urinary tract infections; resistance to antibiotics is associated with mutations (fluoroquinolones) or mediated by the acquisitions of mobile genetic elements (production of extended spectrum beta-lactamases-ESBLs and carbapenemase) [13]. Klebsiella pneumoniae is mainly found in the human gastrointestinal tract, skin, and respiratory tract, and causes healthcare-associated infections. K. pneumoniae can acquire resistance genes through plasmids and, as E. coli, can have genes in their chromosome that encode class A beta-lactamase [14]. P. aeruginosa is a ubiquitous bacterium that can become an opportunistic pathogen in hospitalized and immunocompromised individuals. It commonly causes healthcare-associated pneumonia, bloodstream infections, and urinary tract infections. P. aeruginosa is intrinsically resistant to the majority of antimicrobial agents due to its selective ability to prevent various antibiotic molecules from penetrating its outer membrane or to extrude them if they enter the cell. The antimicrobial groups that remain active include fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, some beta-lactams (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam), and polymyxins. Resistance of P. aeruginosa to these agents can be acquired through one or more of several mechanisms, including modified antimicrobial targets, efflux and reduced permeability, and degrading enzymes [15]. Species belonging to the Acinetobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens primarily associated with healthcare-associated infections. Species belonging to the complex are intrinsically resistant to most antimicrobial agents due to their selective ability to prevent various molecules from penetrating their outer membrane. The antimicrobial groups that remain active include some fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin), aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), carbapenems, polymyxins, sulbactam, and tigecycline. Resistance to antibiotics can lead to mutation in the chromosome or plasmid acquisition [13,16,17].
Proceeding on this track, we aimed to define new antimicrobial candidates starting from an in-house database of heteroaryl-ethylenes which were previously tested in vitro for their antitumor activity on different human cancer cell lines [18,19,20]. The stilbene structure can be considered a privileged scaffold as it occurs frequently both in biologically active natural compounds (i.e., resveratrol) and in synthetic derivatives [21,22,23,24,25], for applications ranging from the visualization of biomolecules in living systems and real-time tracking of cellular events to fluorescent dye guidance during surgeries. These systems offer several advantages, including easy, rapid, efficient, and inexpensive synthetic procedures; good ADME properties; and high photo-stability.
Further exploration of these structures, from both a synthetic and a microbiological perspective, will be the focus of this work. A preliminary antimicrobial structure-activity relationship (SAR) investigation was performed, using forty stilbenic and heteroaromatic compounds whose antimicrobial activity towards S. aureus was previously reported [22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], in order to select eight promising candidates (PB1-8, see Scheme S1).
The spectrum of ability of the PBn compounds to inhibit the proliferation of bacterial cultures was evaluated through MIC (minimal inhibition concentration) and MBC (minimal bactericidal concentration) assays on a selected sample of Gram-positive and Gram-negative ATCC strains. We also tested scalar inoculum concentrations to assess if the molecules had inoculum effect. All compounds were tested for their cytotoxicity on colon-rectal adenocarcinoma tumor cells (CaCo2).
Our preliminary results are highly encouraging and pave the way for further investigations of heteroaryl-ethylenes as antimicrobial agents against difficult-to-treat Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. These novel compounds may be both safe and effective in the treatment of several Gram-positive bacterial infections, especially those caused by MRSA, VRE, and Acinetobacter baumannii.

2. Results

2.1. VolSurf+ Analysis

The antibacterial effects of the compounds reported in Scheme S1 were evaluated in silico using the Volsurf+ software (see Supplementary Materials for further details) [36,37,38,39,40,41]. The data for the microbiological activity, expressed as MIC (mg/L), of 40 heteroaryl and stilbenoids compounds (Table S1) tested on S. aureus ATCC29213 constituted our library for the prediction of the antibacterial activity [22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The partial least squares (PLS) model obtained allowed us to locate the most active compounds in the upper left side of the 2D scores plot (Figure 1). The biological/chemical space represented by the PLS t1/t2 scores plot was properly explored and the model showed high predictive accuracy (R2 = 0.88). The leave-one-out (LOO) procedure was used to validate the model internally and to evaluate its predictive ability; a Q2 value of 0.36 was obtained.
We used this model for the external prediction of more than seventy-five structures from our in-house database of heteroaryl-ethylenes (yellow circles in Figure 1 inset indicate the predicted compounds) [18,19,20]; we selected six promising candidates (PB1–6) [18,20] and designed two new molecules (PB7–8). This statistical and molecular modelling approach allowed us not only to highlight a promising scaffold (positioned in the lower left-hand corner of the 2D scores plot in Figure 1 but also to define key molecular properties, as molecular interaction fields (MIFs)-based descriptors that correlate with activity for drug candidates.
The percentage of unionized species (%FU), 3D pharmacophoric descriptors (DODODO, ACDODO, and DRDODO) and those related to H-bond donors volume (WO1 and WO2) are directly correlated with the observed antimicrobial activity. SKIN, ID1-2, and LogPc-Hex descriptors (referring to ADME properties such as skin permeability, to physico-chemical properties such as distance of the hydrophobic volume from the center of mass and to the partition coefficient water/cyclohexane) are inversely correlated with the measured biological activity. The compound showing the most promising activity is PB4; however, all structures of the PB series should have good bacteriostatic activity. These preliminary results guided the synthesis of the new compounds and the in vitro evaluation of the designed test set.

2.2. Synthesis of PBn Compounds

The strategy used to synthesize the new designed molecule, PB7–8, involves Knoevenagel condensation between the proper heteroaromatic aldehyde and 2-methyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroisoquinolin-2-ium iodide; see Supplementary Materials for the detailed experimental procedure.

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity of PBn Compounds against Control Strains

The spectrum of ability of the PBn compounds to inhibit the proliferation of bacterial cultures was evaluated by means of standard MIC (minimal inhibition concentration) and MBC (minimal bactericidal concentration) assays.
To assess the activity of the selected compounds, we included in the study other control strains selected for their resistance to antibiotics or their ability to infect and damage the host, in order to have a sample as varied as possible.

2.3.1. Antimicrobial Activity of PBn Compounds against Gram-Positive Strains

We included four S. aureus: ATCC12598–MSSA as the standard for the MIC evaluation of S. aureus; the Mu50 strain, as it was a VISA strain; USA300 as it was a community acquired MRSA; and ATCC12598, as it was a particularly invasive MSSA strain. For Enterococcus spp. we included E. faecalis ATCC29212–VSE as the standard for MIC evaluation and the ACTT51299 as it was an E. faecalis VRE.
As reported in Table 1, all strains showed good MIC values for compounds PB4, PB5, PB7, and PB8; to the best of our knowledge, these compounds showed the lowest values reported to date for stilbenoid compounds. None of the six strains tested against these compounds showed a difference in MIC of more than two dilution factors. The compounds that yielded the best MIC values (MIC ≤ 16 mg/L), namely PB4, PB5, PB7, and PB8, were tested for their bactericidal activity. The results of the MBC assays are also listed in Table 1.
Remarkable was the comparison between MIC and MBC values, e.g., PB4 always showed three values of difference; PB5 and PB7 had variable values for Staphylococci, while they have been shown to have a difference of 4 to 5 dilutions in Enterococci; PB8 showed no significant differences between MICs and MBCs in either case.
Considering the situation where MIC and MBC values coincide, we could elaborate that the action of the substance in question was bactericidal, whereas if there was a difference, the action of the substance in MIC values was only bacteriostatic. Translating this concept to the present work, a comparison can be made for each individual strain by looking at which compound had the lowest MBC value at the same MIC: an explicative example was shown with E. faecalis ATCC29212 and E. faecalis ATCC51299, in which PB5 and PB8 have the same MIC, but PB8 does not induce a bacteriostatic effect only, but also a bactericidal one. An opposite result was observed by performing the same analysis for S.aureus Mu50.
Furthermore, the PB4, PB5, PB7, and PB8 compounds were tested on S. aureus ATCC12598 and E. faecalis VRE ATCC51299 at different inocula ranging from 1 × 10 to 1 × 107 CFU/mL, considering that the standard inoculum for S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. was 1 × 105 (Table S3).
The tests performed revealed an inoculum effect (IE). The PB4 and PB5 compounds showed an IE on S. aureus ATCC12598 in a range between <0.015 and 4 mg/L and from 0.03 to 8 mg/L respectively, while the IE on E. faecalis VRE ATCC51299 was evident for inocula lower than 1 × 105 in a range from 0.06 to 0.5 mg/L for PB4 and from 0.5 to 4 mg/L for PB5.
PB7 and PB8 exhibited an IE on S. aureus ATCC 12598 in a range from 2 to 32 mg/L and from 0.5 to 4 mg/L, which was most evident at the highest and lowest inoculum concentrations, 1 × 107 and 1 × 101 respectively.
PB7, tested on E. faecalis ATCC51299, only had an IE at inoculum concentration higher than 1 × 105 in a range from 8 to 32 mg/L, while PB8 acted on E. faecalis ATCC51299 in a range from 0.5 to 32 mg/L with an IE at the highest and lowest inoculum concentrations, namely 1 × 107 and 1 × 101 respectively.

2.3.2. Antimicrobial Activity of PB Compounds against Gram-Negative Strains

We included ATCC strains belonging to different species, namely A. baumannii ATCC17978; E. coli ATCC25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC27853; and two strains of K. pneumoniae: ATCC700603 and the MDR strain ATCC BAA-2814.
As showed in Table 2, compounds PB1, PB2, PB3, PB5, PB6, PB7, and PB8 had MIC values ranging from 32 to 128 mL/L. Only PB4 showed good effectiveness in contrasting bacterial growth in E. coli and A. baumannii, with an MIC value of 0.25 mg/L and a good bactericidal action, with an MBC value of 0.5 mg/L.
The behavior of molecules was variable when tested on E. coli ATCC 25922: PB1 and PB3 acted at 16 mg/L, PB5 and PB7 at 32 mg/L, PB2, and PB8 at 128 mg/L. PB4 was the only molecule of those tested to have bacteriostatic action, with a MIC value of 1 mg/L, and t bactericidal action, with an MBC value of 4 mg/L.
For P. aeruginosa, all compounds showed MIC values comprised between 32 and 128 mg/L. For the two different strains of K. pneumoniae, MIC values were approximately 64 to 128 mg/L.
As previously described for Staphylococchi and Enterococchi, we tested the IE effect, but decided to focus on the PB4 compound as it showed the best antimicrobial performance on E. coli and A. baumannii.
All strains exhibited an IE for inoculum concentrations lower than 1 × 105 CFU/mL only, in particular: A. baumanni ATCC17978 and E. coli ATCC25922 showed similar ranges, from <0.25 to 1 mg/L and from 0.5 to 2 mg/L respectively (Table S5).

2.4. Evaluation of Cell Cytotoxicity by MTT Assay

To evaluate the biological activity of the PBn series, compounds were screened for toxicity against the colon-rectal cancer cell line CaCo-2 (ATCC HTB-37).
These human cancer cells were treated with solutions of the compounds at decreasing concentrations, starting from 100 μM up to 0.01 μM. The reference compound used for these assays was 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu), a pyrimidine analogue belonging to the family of antimetabolite.
The antiproliferative activity of these solutions was evaluated after 24 h of incubation, performing 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays to obtain cell growth curves and IC50 values, reported in Figure 2 and Table S2, respectively.
The data showed that all compounds of the PBn series possess high ability to influence cell growth, as their IC50 values were significantly lower than the well-known 5-FU.
The PB2-4 compounds were highly cytotoxic, with IC50 values oscillating between 0.32 and 0.87 μM. PB4 was the compound with the most promising IC50, 0.32 uM, showing a cytostatic activity two order of magnitude lower than 5-FU.
The PB1 and PB7 compounds exhibit moderate toxicity, with IC50 values of 1.2 and 1.36 μM, respectively. Noteworthy, PB5, PB6, and PB8 were the less antiproliferative compounds, showing IC50 values of 3.90, 6.80, and 5 μM, respectively; nevertheless, their activity was significantly higher than 5-FU (27.36 μM).

3. Discussion and Conclusions

In the first phase of this work, attention was paid to the construction of a QSAR model, through the VolSurf+ software, for the evaluation of the microbiological activity of heteroaryl-ethylenes. Although few data have been reported for this kind of synthetic derivative [22,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], it was possible to take advantage of the data available for stilbenic molecules mainly derived from natural sources. One of the most investigated bacterial strain is S. aureus ATCC29213, and this allowed us to build up the PLS model; the aim of this kind of statistical and molecular modelling approach is to highlight promising scaffolds. The projection of an in-house database of heteroaryl-ethylenes on the new activity model allowed us both to select six structures with different chemical structure from an in-house database of etheroaril-hethylenes and to design two new molecules, which were synthesized, purified, and characterized (see Section 4 and Supplementary Materials).
Antibiotics resistance was one of the major concerns in the presence of bacterial infection, especially those caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus and Enterococcus spp. resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and daptomycin, and those caused by Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to carbapenems and polymyxins [12,13,42,43].
Our compounds showed a wide spectrum of action; in particular, PB2, PB3, and PB6 were active with different ranges of MIC on S. aureus and Enterococcus spp.; PB6 on S. aureus strains; PB5 and PB8 showed good MIC values (ranging from 0.5 to 4 mg/L for PB5 and 2 to 4 mg/L for PB8) for S. aureus and Enterococcus spp; PB1 instead was only active on S. aureus not resistant to methicillin. The most promising molecule was PB4, active on S. aureus, Enterococcus spp., E. coli, and A. baumannii, with the MIC values between 0.25 and 1 mg/L, the lowest among all of the molecules tested. These promising findings were also confirmed by MBC and by the results obtained testing for inoculum effect.
According to the definition of bactericidal/bacteriostatic proprieties (bacteriostatic activity has been defined as a MBC/MIC ratio >4, but several technical problems and other factors can affect determination of the ratio) [44], PB4 and P8 showed bactericidal effect (MBC/MIC ≤ 4), whereas PB5 and PB6 showed a strain-dependent bactericidal/bacteriostatic activity.
The evaluation of the toxicity of the molecules of this set towards a human colorectal cancer (CaCo-2) cell line was comparable to the results obtained from a known anticancer drug, namely 5-Fluorouracil. For PB1 to BP6, the results were in line with data previously reported for human breast cancer cell line [18,19,20]. All molecules proved to be much more active than 5-Fluorouracil against CaCo-2 cells. Under the conditions tested, the less active molecule inhibits the growth and replication of cancer cells at a concentration corresponding to 1/5 of that required for 5 Fluorouracil.
After this preliminary evaluation of the biological activity of the designed compounds, our next steps in this study will certainly involve: (i) testing these molecules on clinical strains of MRSA, Enterococcus spp., E. coli, and A. baumannii; (ii) evaluating the inhibition of bacterial and cellular replication at the same time; (iii) understanding the mechanisms by which these compounds exert their antibacterial and antitumor activity to gain a deeper insight into the role of bacterial infections in the development of cancer. Particular attention will be devoted to the most promising compound, namely PB4, that showed promising results for the treatment of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial infections.
As evidenced by the molecular modelling studies, this compound has the right balance between charge state and hydrophobic/hydrophilic region descriptors and may lead to the development of new drugs. However, these structural features may enable oxidation/hydroxylation through bacterial multicomponent monooxygenases (BMMs), that catalyze oxidation/hydroxylation of hydrocarbon substrates in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains [45]. This explains the low antimicrobial activity observed towards these Gram-negative bacterial strains.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

All solvents and reagents, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroisoquinoline, and 5-(3-chlorophenyl) furan-2-carbaldehyde were obtained from Sigma Aldrich and were used as received. PB1-6, 2-ethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroisoquinolin-2-ium iodide, and 5′-(dibuthylamino) [2,2′-bithiophene]-5-carbaldehyde were prepared according to literature procedures [18,19,20,46,47]. All reactions were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere unless otherwise stated. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on Merck silica gel plates with F-254 indicator. Column chromatography was performed on Silica gel 60. 1H and 13CNMR spectra were recorded at 27 °C using a Varian Inova 500 spectrometer. Chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in ppm and referenced to residual undeuterated solvent.

4.2. Microorganisms and Growth Conditions

Control strains S. aureus ATCC29213, S. aureus ATCC12598, S. aureus ATCC BAA-1556 (USA300), S. aureus ATCC 700699 (Mu50-NRS1), E. faecalis ATCC29212, E. faecalis ATCC51299, A. baumannii ATCC17978; E. coli ATCC25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, K. pneumoniae ATCC700603; and the MDR strain K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2814 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA).
S. aureus was grown on Mannitol Salt Agar (CM0085B, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™, Basingstoke, UK); E. faecalis and E. faecium on Bile Esculine Agar (CM0888, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™, Basingstoke, UK); and A. baumannii, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and K. pneumoniae on MecConkey agar (CM0007, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™, Basingstoke, UK) at 37 °C for 24 h.

4.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC)

Microtiter plate assays were performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of the PB molecules according to the standard method [48], with some modifications.
All compounds were at a concentration of 8.000 mg/L in 100% dimethylsulfoxide DMSO (85190, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™, Basingstoke, UK). Further dilutions of the substances were prepared using Mueller Hinton II Broth Cation-Adjusted (CA-MHB) (212322, BD BBLTM, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The tested concentration range was between 128 mg/L and 0.25 mg/L. A 100-μL aliquot of each PB molecules was inoculated in 96-well microplates containing sterile CA-MHB and serial dilutions were performed.
Subsequently, starting from different 0.5 Mc Farland (108 CFU/mL) bacterial suspension, scalar dilutions of the inoculum were carried out in order to evaluate the presence of an inoculum effect. The microplates were incubated for 18 ± 2 h at 37 °C.
MIC values were determined at the lowest antimicrobial agent concentration inhibiting bacterial growth, MBCs at the lowest concentration of each antimicrobial agent resulting in microbial death, as defined by the inability to re-culture bacteria.
To perform MBC assays, the entire volume of the well containing no visible bacterial growth (MIC value), and three dilutions higher and lower than the MIC value, were plated in Tryptone Soya Agar (CM013, Thermo Scientific™ Oxoid™, Basingstoke, UK).
The MIC and MBC values were expressed in mg/L. The tests were repeated in duplicate for all substances, and two further MICs were performed on PB4, PB5, PB7, and PB8, as these were considered to be the most promising compounds of the entire series.

4.4. Evaluation of the Anticarcinogenic Activity of the PB Series on Human Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cells

To evaluate the effect of the substances, an MTT ([3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide]) assay was performed as previously described (Biomolecules). Briefly, human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (CaCo-2 HTB-37TM Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Human, American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) were grown in Dulbecco’s MEM (DMEM) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine, penicillin-streptomycin (50 units-50 μg for mL) and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air. CaCo-2 cells were plated in 96 well pates and incubated at 37 °C. The PBn series compounds and 5-FU were prepared as a 1 mM solution in 10 mL with 0.01% DMSO. Then, 24 h after plating, cells were treated with 20 μL of each solution. Untreated cells were used as controls. Microplates were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air for 24 h, and then cytotoxicity was measured with colorimetric assay based on the use of tetrazolium salt MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide. IC50: this parameter expresses the concentration of the tested compound necessary to kill half of the cell population after 24 h of incubation relative to untreated controls. The results were read on a multiwell scanning spectrophotometer (AF2200 plate reader, Eppendorf, Milan, Italy), using a wavelength of 569 nm. Each value was an average of 4 wells. The IC50 values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using the GraphPad Prism 6.0 software.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10091034/s1, Figure S1. 1H-NMR spectrum of PB7; Figure S2. 13C-NMR spectrum of PB7; Figure S3. 1H-NMR spectrum of PB8; Figure S4. 13C-NMR spectrum of PB8; Table S1. Structures of the 40 compounds used to generate the QSARmodel in VolSurf+; VolSurf+ computational procedure; Table S2. IC50 values obtained from the MTT assays after 24 h of incubation relative to untreated controls.; Table S3. MIC values for ATCC12598 and ATCC51299 with different inocula; Table S4. PB4 MIC values for ATCC 17978 and ATCC25922 with different inocula Scheme S1. Structures of the investigated PBn compounds; Synthesis of PB7; Synthesis of PB8.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, data curation, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing, D.B., N.M., and C.B.; formal analysis, investigation, original draft preparation, P.G.B., D.A.B., and M.M.; validation, formal analysis, investigation and supervision, S.S. (Stefano Stracquadanio); methodology, resources, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing, C.G.F. and S.S. (Stefania Stefani). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The manuscript was partially supported by a research grant project number PRIN2017SFBFER from the Ministry of Research (MIUR) Italy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank PharmaTranslated (http://www.pharmatranslated.com/) and in particular to Silvia Montanari for the language revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO Publishes List of Bacteria for Which New Antibiotics Are Urgently Needed. Available online: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed (accessed on 12 May 2021).
  2. Tang, J.; Chu, B.; Wang, J.; Song, B.; Su, Y.; Wang, H.; He, Y. Multifunctional nanoagents for ultrasensitive imaging and photoactive killing of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Commun. 2019, 10, 4057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Carreño, G.; Marican, A.; Vijayakumar, S.; Valdés, O.; Cabrera-Barjas, G.; Castaño, J.; Durán-Lara, E.F. Sustained release of linezolid from prepared hydrogels with polyvinyl alcohol and aliphatic dicarboxylic acids of variable chain lengths. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gaeta, M.; Sanfilippo, G.; Fraix, A.; Sortino, G.; Barcellona, M.; Oliveri Conti, G.; Fragalà, M.E.; Ferrante, M.; Purrello, R.; D’Urso, A. Photodegradation of antibiotics by noncovalent porphyrin-functionalized tio2 in water for the bacterial antibiotic resistance risk management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pancu, D.F.; Scurtu, A.; Macasoi, I.G.; Marti, D.; Mioc, M.; Soica, C.; Coricovac, D.; Horhat, D.; Poenaru, M.; Dehelean, C. Antibiotics: Conventional therapy and natural compounds with antibacterial activity-a pharmaco-toxicological screening. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Douafer, H.; Andrieu, V.; Phanstiel, O., 4th; Brunel, J.M. Antibiotic adjuvants: Make antibiotics great again! J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 8665–8681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rossiter, S.E.; Fletcher, M.H.; Wuest, W.M. Natural products as platforms to overcome antibiotic resistance. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 12415–12474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fortuna, C.G.; Berardozzi, R.; Bonaccorso, C.; Caltabiano, G.; Di Bari, L.; Goracci, L.; Guarcello, A.; Pace, A.; Palumbo Piccionello, A.; Pescitelli, G.; et al. New potent antibacterials against Gram-positive multiresistant pathogens: Effects of side chain modification and chirality in linezolid-like 1,2,4-oxadiazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6814–6825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net)-Annual Epidemiological Report for 2019. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2019 (accessed on 12 May 2021).
  10. Campanile, F.; Bongiorno, D.; Perez, M.; Mongelli, G.; Sessa, L.; Benvenuto, S.; Gona, F.; Varaldo, P.E.; Stefani, S. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus in Italy: First nationwide survey, 2012. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2015, 3, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cassini, A.; Högberg, L.D.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.S.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bressan, R.; Knezevich, A.; Monticelli, J.; Campanile, F.; Busetti, M.; Santagati, M.; Dolzani, L.; Milan, A.; Bongiorno, D.; Di Santolo, M.; et al. Spread of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates despite validated infection control measures in an Italian hospital: Antibiotic resistance and genotypic characterization of the endemic strain. Microb. Drug Resist. 2018, 24, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Aprile, A.; Scalia, G.; Stefani, S.; Mezzatesta, M.L. In vitro fosfomycin study on concordance of susceptibility testing methods against ESBL and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020, 23, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gona, F.; Bongiorno, D.; Aprile, A.; Corazza, E.; Pasqua, B.; Scuderi, M.G.; Chiacchiaretta, M.; Cirillo, D.M.; Stefani, S.; Mezzatesta, M.L. Emergence of two novel sequence types (3366 and 3367) NDM-1- and OXA-48-co-producing K. pneumoniae in Italy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 1687–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mularoni, A.; Mezzatesta, M.L.; Pilato, M.; Medaglia, A.A.; Cervo, A.; Bongiorno, D.; Aprile, A.; Luca, A.; Stefani, S.; Grossi, P. Combination of aztreonam, ceftazidime-avibactam and amikacin in the treatment of VIM-1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST235 osteomyelitis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 108, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mezzatesta, M.L.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Migliavacca, R.; Giani, T.; Gona, F.; Nucleo, E.; Fugazza, G.; Pagani, L.; Rossolini, G.M.; Stefani, S. Epidemiological characterization and distribution of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates in Italy. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe 2018. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2018 (accessed on 28 July 2021).
  18. Fortuna, C.G.; Barresi, V.; Bonaccorso, C.; Consiglio, G.; Failla, S.; Trovato-Salinaro, A.; Musumarra, G. Design, synthesis and in vitro antitumour activity of new heteroaryl ethylenes. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 47, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barresi, V.; Bonaccorso, C.; Consiglio, G.; Goracci, L.; Musso, N.; Musumarra, G.; Satriano, C.; Fortuna, C.G. Modeling, design and synthesis of new heteroaryl ethylenes active against the MCF-7 breast cancer cell-line. Mol. Biosyst. 2013, 9, 2426–2429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bonaccorso, C.; Naletova, I.; Satriano, C.; Spampinato, G.; Barresi, V.; Fortuna, C.G. New Di(heteroaryl) ethenes as apoptotic anti-proliferative agents towards breast cancer: Design, one-pot synthesis and in vitro evaluation. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 2581–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mattio, L.M.; Catinella, G.; Dallavalle, S.; Pinto, A. Stilbenoids: A natural arsenal against bacterial pathogens. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zakova, T.; Rondevaldova, J.; Bernardos, A.; Landa, P.; Kokoska, L. The relationship between structure and in vitro antistaphylococcal effect of plant-derived stilbenes. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2018, 65, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Culpitt, S.V.; Rogers, D.F.; Fenwick, P.S.; Shah, P.; De Matos, C.; Russell, R.E.K.; Barnes, P.J.; Donnelly, L.E. Inhibition by red wine extract, resveratrol, of cytokine release by alveolar macrophages in COPD. Thorax 2003, 58, 942–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Giacomini, E.; Rupiani, S.; Guidotti, L.; Recanatini, M.; Roberti, M. The use of stilbene scaffold in medicinal chemistry and multi-target drug design. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 2439–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Filippis, B.; Ammazzalorso, A.; Fantacuzzi, M.; Giampietro, L.; Maccallini, C.; Amoroso, R. Anticancer activity of stilbene-based derivatives. ChemMedChem 2017, 12, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Eibergen, N.R.; Im, I.; Patel, N.Y.; Hergenrother, P.J. Identification of a novel protein synthesis inhibitor active against Gram-positive bacteria. ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nicolaou, K.C.; Roecker, A.J.; Barluenga, S.; Pfefferkorn, J.A.; Cao, G.Q. Discovery of novel antibacterial agents active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from combinatorial benzopyran libraries. ChemBioChem 2001, 2, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eloff, J.N.; Katerere, D.R.; Mcgaw, L.J. The biological activity and chemistry of the southern African Combretaceae. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 119, 686–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Franchini, C.; Muraglia, M.; Corbo, F.; Florio, M.A.; Di Mola, A.; Rosato, A.; Matucci, R.; Nesi, M.; Van Bambeke, F.; Vitali, C. Synthesis and biological evaluation of 2-mercapto-1,3-benzothiazole derivatives with potential antimicrobial activity. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 2009, 342, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Racané, L.; Ptiček, L.; Fajdetić, G.; Tralić-kulenović, V.; Klobučar, M.; Starčević, K. Bioorganic Chemistry Green synthesis and biological evaluation of 6-substituted-2-(2-hydroxy/methoxy phenyl) benzothiazole derivatives as potential antioxidant, antibacterial and antitumor agents. Bioorganic Chem. 2020, 95, 103537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kabir, M.S.; Engelbrecht, K.; Polanowski, R.; Krueger, S.M.; Ignasiak, R.; Rott, M.; Schwan, W.R.; Stemper, M.E.; Reed, K.D.; Sherman, D.; et al. New classes of Gram-positive selective antibacterials: Inhibitors of MRSA and surrogates of the causative agents of anthrax and tuberculosis. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 5745–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schwan, W.R.; Kabir, M.S.; Kallaus, M.; Krueger, S.; Monte, A.; Cook, J.M. Synthesis and minimum inhibitory concentrations of SK-03-92 against Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria. J. Infect. Chemother. 2012, 18, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Su, Y.; Ma, L.; Wen, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, S. Studies of the in vitro antibacterial activities of several polyphenols against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Molecules 2014, 19, 12630–12639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, E.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.J.; Kwon, O.P.; Yoon, H. New antibacterial-core structures based on styryl quinolinium. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chauhan, J.; Yu, W.; Cardinale, S.; Opperman, T.J.; MacKerell Jr, A.D.; Fletcher, S.; de Leeuw, E.P.H. Optimization of a benzothiazole indolene scaffold targeting bacterial cell wall assembly. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2020, 14, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cruciani, G.; Pastor, M.; Guba, W. VolSurf: A new tool for the pharmacokinetic optimization of lead compounds. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000, 11, S29–S39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Berellini, G.; Cruciani, G.; Mannhold, R. Pharmacophore, Drug Metabolism, and Pharmacokinetics Models on Non-Peptide AT 1, AT 2, and AT 1/AT 2 Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4389–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Crivori, P.; Cruciani, G.; Carrupt, P.-A.; Testa, B. Predicting blood-brain barrier permeation from three-dimensional molecular structure. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2204–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Carosati, E.; Sciabola, S.; Cruciani, G. Hydrogen Bonding Interactions of Covalently Bonded Fluorine Atoms: From Crystallographic Data to a New Angular Function in the GRID Force Field. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5114–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wold, S.; Sjöström, M. SIMCA: A Method for Analyzing Chemical Data in Terms of Similarity and Analogy. In Chemometrics: Theory and Application; Kowalski, B.R., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1977; pp. 243–282. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fortuna, C.G.; Barresi, V.; Musumarra, G. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of trans 2-(thiophen-2-yl)vinyl heteroaromatic iodides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 4516–4523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bongiorno, D.; Musso, N.; Lazzaro, L.M.; Mongelli, G.; Stefani, S.; Campanile, F. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus persistence in osteoblasts using imaging flow cytometry. MicrobiologyOpen 2020, 9, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mezzatesta, M.L.; Caio, C.; Gona, F.; Cormaci, R.; Salerno, I.; Zingali, T.; Denaro, C.; Gennaro, M.; Quattrone, C.; Stefani, S. Carbapenem and multidrug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria in a single centre in Italy: Considerations on in vitro assay of active drugs. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Pankey, G.A.; Sabath, L.D. Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Neilson, A.H.; Allard, A.-S. Environmental Degradation and Transformation of Organic Chemicals, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fortuna, C.G.; Bonaccorso, C.; Qamar, F.; Anu, A.; Ledoux, I.; Musumarra, G. Synthesis and NLO properties of new trans 2-(thiophen-2-yl)vinyl heteroaromatic iodides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 1608–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ling, R.; Yoshida, M.; Mariano, P.S. Exploratory investigations probing a preparatively versatile, pyridinium salt photoelectrocyclization-solvolytic aziridine ring opening sequence. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4439–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing–EUCAST. Standard Operation Procedures. SOP 1.3. 23 October 2019. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/publications_and_documents/sops/ (accessed on 28 July 2021).
Antibiotics 10 01034 g001 550
Figure 1. Two-dimensional scores plot of the PLS activity model at second latent variable and projection of designed compounds (inset: zoom on PBn projection). Color-scale by cytotoxic activity value: cyan/blue, low antimicrobial activity; pink/red, high antimicrobial activity; yellow circles: designed PBn compounds.
Figure 1. Two-dimensional scores plot of the PLS activity model at second latent variable and projection of designed compounds (inset: zoom on PBn projection). Color-scale by cytotoxic activity value: cyan/blue, low antimicrobial activity; pink/red, high antimicrobial activity; yellow circles: designed PBn compounds.
Antibiotics 10 01034 g001
Antibiotics 10 01034 g002 550
Figure 2. Dose–response curves of antiproliferative activities of PBn compounds and 5-FU against CaCo-2 cells after 24-h treatment.
Figure 2. Dose–response curves of antiproliferative activities of PBn compounds and 5-FU against CaCo-2 cells after 24-h treatment.
Antibiotics 10 01034 g002
Table
Table 1. MIC and MBC values for Gram-positive control strains.
Table 1. MIC and MBC values for Gram-positive control strains.
mg/L (μM)
StrainPB1PB2PB3PB4PB5PB6PB7PB8
MICMICMICMICMBCMICMBCMICMICMBCMICMBC
S.aureus Mu50-VISA32
(76.87)		8
(13.59)		32
(70.28)		0.25
(0.49)		2
(3.91)		2
(3.70)		4
(7.40)		4
(8.73)		16
(34.50)		16
(34.50)		2
(3.46)		8
(13.83)
S.aureus USA300-CAMRSA2
(4.80)		4
(6.80)		2
(4.39)		0.25
(0.49)		2
(3.91)		0,5
(0.93)		4
(7.40)		4
(8.73)		2
(4.31)		32
(69.00)		2
(3.46)		4
(6.91)
S.aureus ATCC29213-MSSA4
(9.61)		4
(6.80)		4
(8.78)		0.25
(0.49)		2
(3.91)		1
(1.85)		4
(7.40)		4
(8.73)		4
(8.63)		4
(8.63)		2
(3.46)		8
(13.83)
S.aureus ATCC12598-MSSA2
(4.80)		4
(6.80)		8
(17.57)		0.25
(0.49)		2
(3.91)		4
(7.40)		4
(7.40)		8
(17.46)		8
(17.25)		8
(17.25)		2
(3.46)		4
(6.91)
E. faecalis ATCC51299-VRE32
(76.87)		16
(27.18)		32
(70.28)		0.5
(0.98)		4
(7.82)		4
(7.40)		128
(236.94)		32
(69.85)		8
(17.25)		128
(276.02)		4
(6.91)		4
(6.91)
E. faecalis ATCC29212-VSE32
(76.87)		16
(27.18)		32
(70.28)		0.5
(0.98)		4
(7.82)		4
(7.40)		128
(236.94)		32
(69.85)		8
(17.25)		128
(276.02)		4
(6.91)		4
(6.91)
VISA: vancomycin intermediate S. aureus; CAMRSA: community acquired methicillin resistant S. aureus; MSSA: methicillin susceptible S. aureus; VRE: vancomycin resistant enterococci; VSE: vancomycin susceptible enterococci.
Table
Table 2. MIC and MBC values for Gram-negative control strains.
Table 2. MIC and MBC values for Gram-negative control strains.
mg/L (μM)
StrainPB1PB2PB3PB4PB5PB6PB7PB8
MICMICMICMICMBCMICMICMICMIC
A. baumannii ATCC17978128
(307.47)		32
(54.37)		64
(140.55)		0.25
(0.49)		0.5
(0.98)		>128
(>236.94)		64
(137.70)		32
(69.00)		128
(221.22)
E. coli ATCC2592216
(38.43)		128
(217.47)		16
(35.14)		1
(1.96)		4
(7.82)		32
(59.24)		>128
(>279.40)		32
(69.00)		128
(221.22)
P. aeruginosa ATCC27853>128
(>307.47)		32
(54.37)		>128
(281.10)		64
(125.14)		->128
(>236.94)		>128
(>279.40)		>128
(>276.02)		>128
(>221.22)
K. pneumoniae ATCC700603>128
(>307.47)		>128
(>217.47)		>128
(>281.10)		>128
(>250.27)		->128
(>236.94)		>128
(>279.40)		128
(276.02)		>128
(>221.22)
K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2814>128
(>307.47)		>128
(>217.47)		128
(>281.10)		64
(125.14)		->128
(>236.94)		>128
(>279.40)		64
(138.01)		>128
(>221.22)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bongiorno, D.; Musso, N.; Bonacci, P.G.; Bivona, D.A.; Massimino, M.; Stracquadanio, S.; Bonaccorso, C.; Fortuna, C.G.; Stefani, S. Heteroaryl-Ethylenes as New Lead Compounds in the Fight against High Priority Bacterial Strains. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091034

AMA Style

Bongiorno D, Musso N, Bonacci PG, Bivona DA, Massimino M, Stracquadanio S, Bonaccorso C, Fortuna CG, Stefani S. Heteroaryl-Ethylenes as New Lead Compounds in the Fight against High Priority Bacterial Strains. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(9):1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bongiorno, Dafne, Nicolò Musso, Paolo G. Bonacci, Dalida A. Bivona, Mariacristina Massimino, Stefano Stracquadanio, Carmela Bonaccorso, Cosimo G. Fortuna, and Stefania Stefani. 2021. "Heteroaryl-Ethylenes as New Lead Compounds in the Fight against High Priority Bacterial Strains" Antibiotics 10, no. 9: 1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10091034

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop