Next Article in Journal
Development of Positively Charged Poly-L-Lysine Magnetic Nanoparticles as Potential MRI Contrast Agent
Next Article in Special Issue
Tailoring the Size and Shape of ZnO Nanoparticles for Enhanced Performance of OLED Device
Previous Article in Journal
Adjustable Trifunctional Mid-Infrared Metamaterial Absorber Based on Phase Transition Material VO2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards Unbiased Fluorophore Counting in Superresolution Fluorescence Microscopy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/nano13121830
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of the Donor Unit on the Formation of Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Silver Nanoparticles

by
Věra Cimrová
1,*,
Sangwon Eom
2,
Veronika Pokorná
1,
Youngjong Kang
2,3,4 and
Drahomír Výprachtický
1
1
Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovského nám. 2, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Department of Chemistry, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
3
Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
4
Research Institute for Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(12), 1830; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121830
Submission received: 8 May 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 5 June 2023 / Published: 9 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructures for Advanced Photonic Devices)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers containing perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide (PDI) electron-acceptor (A) units belonging to n-type semiconductors are of interest due to their many potential applications in photonics, particularly for electron-transporting layers in all-polymeric or perovskite solar cells. Combining D-A copolymers and silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) can further improve material properties and device performances. Hybrid layers of D-A copolymers containing PDI units and different electron-donor (D) units (9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole or 9,9-dioctylfluorene) with Ag-NPs were prepared electrochemically during the reduction of pristine copolymer layers. The formation of hybrid layers with Ag-NP coverage was monitored by in-situ measurement of absorption spectra. The Ag-NP coverage of up to 41% was higher in hybrid layers made of copolymer with 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D units than in those made of copolymer with 9,9-dioctylfluorene D units. The pristine and hybrid copolymer layers were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, which proved the formation of hybrid layers with stable Ag-NPs in the metallic state with average diameters <70 nm. The influence of D units on Ag-NP diameters and coverage was revealed.

1. Introduction

Metal nanoparticles (NPs) such as gold (Au) and silver (Ag) nanoparticles and their composites have attracted great interest due to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) property of metal NPs exploited for many possible photonic, electronic, chemical, biological, and medical applications, such as in light-emitting devices (LEDs) including lasers [1,2,3,4], perovskite and organic solar cells [5,6,7,8,9], chemical and biological sensors [10,11,12,13,14,15], films with antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activity, including composite films of polyurethane with Ag-NPs with antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 [16,17,18,19], catalysis [20], etc. The combination of metal NPs with organic semiconductors can further improve material properties and device performance due to the LSPR effect, e.g., to increase the device efficiency.
Recently, we have prepared and characterized hybrid layers of two donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers (CFC8-DDPDI and CFC8-EHPDI) with homogenous coverage of silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs) with average sizes below 100 nm [21]. The CFC8-DDPDI and CFC8-EHPDI copolymers, which were used, consist of 9,9-dioctylfluorene electron-donor (D) units and N,N′-dialkylperylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide electron-acceptor (A) units, and they differed by the side chains attached to the perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide (PDI) units (dodecyls and 2-ethylhexyls, respectively). PDI derivatives and copolymers containing this unit are of interest due to their many potential applications, namely, in photonics and electronics [22,23], such as in organic field-effect transistors and phototransistors [24,25,26,27,28,29], organic photovoltaic cells [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], and sensors [40,41,42,43,44,45], due to their specific physical, optical, and/or electronic properties. They represent an interesting class of n-type semiconductors [46,47] and therefore are promising as potential n-type materials for electron-transporting layers in perovskite and all-polymeric solar cells [48,49,50,51,52].
The CFC8-DDPDI and CFC8-EHPDI hybrid layers with Ag-NPs were prepared by electrochemical doping during the reduction of the copolymer layers using silver nitrate. We have found that the coverage and the average diameter of Ag-NPs depended on the applied potential and also on the copolymer side chains on the PDI unit. The hybrid layers exhibited significantly higher light absorption due to the LSPR property of Ag-NPs. Hence, such layers could be promising for use in solar cells. In this paper, we have studied the formation and properties of hybrid layers with Ag-NPs of the D-A copolymer CEHCz-EHPDI (Figure 1), consisting of the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D units and the 2-ethylhexyl substituted PDI A units. The hybrid layer formation and properties are compared with those of the copolymer CFC8-EHPDI studied in our previous paper. The copolymer CEHCz-EHPDI differs from the copolymer CFC8-EHPDI by the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D unit possessing a stronger electron-donating capability than the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D unit. The aim of this work is to investigate the effects of the D unit on the formation of Ag-NP coverage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Chloroform (spectroscopic grade), acetonitrile (extra dry), tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (electrochemical grade), and silver nitrate (AgNO3) were purchased from commercial suppliers (Lach-Ner, Ltd., Neratovice, Czech Republic; VWR International s.r.o., Stříbrná Skalice, Czech Republic; Merck spol. s.r.o., Praha, Czech Republic; Sigma Aldrich spol. s.r.o., Praha, Czech Republic).
The copolymers CEHCz-EHPDI and CFC8-EHPDI under study were synthesized by the Suzuki coupling reaction. The synthesis and their characterization are described in our previous paper [53]. The weight-average molecular weight (Mw) and dispersity (Đ) were for CEHCz-EHPDI Mw = 28,570, Đ = 2.04 and for CFC8-EHPDI Mw = 13,230, Đ = 1.39.

2.2. Layer Preparation

The pristine copolymer layers (PL) were prepared by spin-coating chloroform solution onto glass substrates covered with indium-tin oxide (ITO) in a glove box under a nitrogen atmosphere. The hybrid layers HL1 and HL2 with Ag-NP coverage were prepared by electrochemical doping of corresponding pristine copolymer layers (PL1 and PL2) during the reduction at two potentials (−1 and −1.5 V vs. Ag/Ag+) exceeding the potential of the first and second reduction processes for 12 min, respectively. PL1 and PL2 are pristine layers used for the preparation of hybrid layers HL1 and HL2, respectively. The numbers 1 and 2 in the abbreviations refer to the 1st and 2nd reduction processes, respectively. Thus, HL1 stands for the hybrid layer prepared by doping the pristine PL1 layer at a potential of −1 V vs. Ag/Ag+, corresponding to the first reduction process. HL2 means a hybrid layer prepared by doping the pristine PL2 layer at a potential of −1.5 V vs. Ag/Ag+ exceeding the potential of the 2nd reduction process. These abbreviations are generally used for both copolymers, along with the copolymer abbreviation for distinction. A homemade cuvette three-electrode cell with platinum (Pt) wire as a counter electrode and a non-aqueous Ag/Ag+ reference electrode (Ag in 0.1 M AgNO3 solution) connected to a PA4 polarographic analyzer (Laboratory Instruments, Prague, Czech Republic) was used. A solution of silver nitride in an electrolyte (0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate in anhydrous acetonitrile) with a concentration of 7 × 10−4 M was used for the hybrid layer formation. Layer thicknesses (in the range of 100–160 nm) were measured using a KLA-Tencor P-10 profilometer (KLA-Tencor Corporation, Milpitas, CA, USA).

2.3. Methods

UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded by a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 35 UV/VIS spectrometer (PerkinElmer Instruments, Shelton, WA, USA). They were measured in situ using the homemade cuvette described above, placed in the glove box, and connected to the UV/VIS spectrometer using fiber optics. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were performed using a high-resolution FE-SEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) JSM-7800F Prime equipped with an in-lens Schottky plus field emission electron gun and an EDS detector (resolution: 0.7 nm at 15 kV). A thin Pt conductive layer (~20 Å) was deposited on the layer surfaces before SEM measurements. A K-Alpha+ XPS spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Swindon, UK) operating at a base pressure of 1.0 × 10−7 Pa was used for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. The samples were analyzed using microfocused monochromatic Al Kα X-ray radiation of 72 W with spot sizes of 30 and 400 μm. Survey and high-resultion (HR) spectra were measured with a pass energy of 200 and 50 eV, respectively. The X-ray incidence angle was 30°, and the emission angle was along the surface normal. The calibration of the binding energy (BE) scale of the XPS spectrometer was performed based on well-known peak positions of polyethylene terephthalate (C 1s C–C and C–H; C–O and C(=O)–O), Cu (Cu 2p), Ag (Ag 3d), and Au (Au 4f) metals. The instrument software Thermo Avantage version 5.99.22 was used for the data acquisition and the conversion of the data files to the AVG format. The AVG datafile format was converted to the VAMAS format using CasaXPS software version 2.3.25, which was used for XPS spectra analysis [54]. The quantification was performed applying the analyzer transmission function, Scofield sensitivity factors, effective attenuation lengths (EALs) for photoelectrons, and considering the sum of C, N, O, and Ag atoms as 100% with regions up to approximately 30 eV below the peak kinetic energy. The Universal Tougaard background was used for the analysis [55].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Absorption Properties

The absorption spectra of the CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer pristine layers (PL1, PL2—blue curves) and corresponding hybrid layers with Ag-NPs (HL1, HL2—red curves) prepared at two potentials, –1 V (HL1) and –1.5 V (HL2) vs. Ag/Ag+, i.e., when the potential reached or exceeded the first and second reduction peak potentials, respectively, are displayed in Figure 2. The numbers 1 and 2 in the abbreviations indicate the first and second reduction processes in the preparation of hybrid layers, respectively. PL1 and PL2 are pristine layers used for the preparation of hybrid layers HL1 and HL2, respectively. We use these abbreviations generally for both copolymers for distinction with reference to the respective copolymer. Absorption spectra during Ag doping were also recorded in situ and are displayed as dashed curves in Figure 2. In these spectra, the NIR bands with maxima at ca. 750 and 1030 nm correspond to the first reduction process (PDI− anion), and the absorption in the visible region with two maxima at ca. 600 and 660 nm is characteristic for the second reduction (PDI2− anion). These bands disappeared after turning off the potential, while a new broad absorption in the visible region with maxima located between 380 and 500 nm remained. This increase in absorption reflects changes caused by the formation of Ag-NPs and is related to the LSPR effect, for which an absorption band is characteristic in this spectral region [56,57,58]. The shapes of the absorption spectra of hybrid HL1 and HL2 layers prepared at first and second reduction, respectively, significantly differ. The absorption spectra of the HL2 layers are broader than those of the HL1 layers, and their maxima are blue-shifted. As the position of the LSPR absorption band maximum depends on the size and shape of the Ag-NPs [59], this indicates that the Ag-NP properties and coverage in HL1 and HL2 layers differ. The absorption spectra of the HL1 and HL2 layers of the CFC8-EHPDI copolymer with the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D unit also differed, but in another way, as described in detail in our previous paper [21]. The absorption and difference spectra of both copolymer hybrid layers are displayed in Figure 3 for comparison. The absorption maxima and the maxima of the difference spectra are summarized in Table 1. For the CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer with the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D unit, the absorption spectrum of HL1 is red-shifted, whereas the HL2 spectrum is blue-shifted when compared with the corresponding spectra of HL1 and HL2 layers of the CFC8-EHPDI copolymer with the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D unit. This indicates that the D unit influences the Ag-NP formation during the first and second reduction processes. The red shift and broadening of LSPR absorption can be associated with the increased aggregation of Ag-NPs or different shapes [60,61,62,63,64]. The absorption broadening observed in the spectra of HL2 layers for both copolymers is attributed to the longitudinal SPR due to the higher amount of Ag-NP aggregation and/or formation of Ag-NP chain-like structures at higher Ag-NP coverages.

3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The surface morphologies of hybrid layers were studied by SEM to prove the presence of Ag-NPs and to determine their size and distribution. SEM images of pristine PL and hybrid HL1 and HL2 layers made of copolymers, which differ by the donor units, are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The Ag-NP surface coverage and diameters were evaluated from the SEM images using ImageJ 1.53t software. Differences in both coverage and diameters were found for the copolymers with different D units. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 1. Higher Ag-NP surface coverage values were evaluated for the hybrid layers made of the CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer with the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D unit, possessing the stronger D ability, than for the layers made of the CFC8-EHPDI copolymer with the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D unit. For both copolymers, the coverage is higher for the HL2 layers prepared at the potential exceeding the second reduction process. It reached 41% for the CEHCz-EHPDI HL2 layer and 39% for the CFC8-EHPDI HL2 layer (see Table 1). A more pronounced difference in the Ag-NP surface coverage was found for the HL1 layers prepared at the first reduction process. In this case, the Ag-NP surface coverage values of 27 and 20% were evaluated for the HL1 layers of CEHCz-EHPDI and CFC8-EHPDI, respectively.
The Ag-NP sizes (diameters) differ for the HL1 and HL2 layers, i.e., layers prepared under different conditions, and also for the copolymers under study. For CEHCz-EHPDI hybrid layers, larger diameters are observed for the HL1 layers than for the HL2 layers. This is the opposite result when compared with the CFC8-EHPDI hybrid layers, where Ag-NPs with larger diameters are formed in the HL2 layers than in the HL1 layers. The SEM analysis using Image J provided histograms of the Ag-NP diameters, which were fitted with the normal distribution function (Gaussian) given by the general formula for the probability function f(x) expressed:
f(x) = f0 + A exp(−(x − d0)2/2σ2)
where d0 is the mean diameter and σ is the distribution parameter. The evaluated parameters d0 and σ are given in Table 1. The normal distribution functions are displayed in Figure 6, where the comparison for the copolymers CEHCz-EHPDI with 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole and CFC8-EHPDI with 9,9-dioctylfluorene D unit is shown. These SEM results correlate well with the absorption spectra. They explain the above-mentioned red shifts of the HL1 absorption spectra and the blue shifts of the HL2 absorption spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer compared to the corresponding HL1 and HL2 absorption spectra of CFC8-EHPDI copolymer. An aggregation of Ag-NPs into chain-like structures appeared in HL2 layers with high surface coverage, which is in accord with the broad HL2 absorption spectra. These results are consistent with surface plasmon theory [56].

3.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

XPS was used particularly to identify the state of the Ag-NPs. The XPS wide (survey) and high-resolution (HR) spectra were measured for both the PL and HL layers. An example of the XPS-wide spectra of the PL and HL layers for the CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer is displayed in Figure 7.
XPS-wide spectra of PL layers contain signals from C, O, and N elements of the copolymers and the spectra of HL layers in addition to Ag characteristic peaks, which can be assigned to Ag 4d, Ag 4p, Ag 4s, Ag 3d5/2, Ag 3d3/2, Ag 3p3/2, Ag 3p1/2, and Ag 3s photoelectrons and Ag MNN Auger lines [65]. With the increasing Ag-NP coverage, the inelastic background also increased due to inelastically scattered photoelectrons [66]. To prove the metallic state of Ag-NPs, Auger parameters (APs), α4 and α5, were calculated according to the relation:
α4 (α5) = BEAg3d + KE4 (KE5)
where BEAg3d is the experimental binding energy (BE) of the Ag 3d5/2 component maximum and KE4 and KE5 are the kinetic energies of the two most intense peaks M4N45N45 and M5N45N45 in the Auger electron structure, respectively. For all hybrid layers, the evaluated α4 and α5 values were 725.9–726.0 eV and 720.3–720.5 eV, respectively. These values are in good agreement with those for Ag in the metallic state, which are nearly 2 eV higher than the values for any other oxidized Ag species or Ag in other chemical states [67]. As an example, the lower α4 and α5 values of 723 and 718.2 eV, respectively, were evaluated for AgNO3. Hence, we can rule out any chemical reaction between Ag and the O or N atoms of the copolymer. A partial oxidation of Ag due to the interaction with N atoms was reported, for example, for the Ag-NP-conducting polymer polyaniline [68].
The Ag-NP metallic state was further confirmed by analysis of the HR spectra. The modeling of HR C 1s, Ag 3d, N 1s, and O 1s spectra was performed using the Voigt profile. The residual standard deviation value, which was <1.17, was used to check the goodness of fit. Normalized residuals are displayed below the spectra. The fit goodness was also indicated by the residuals to the fit and Monte Carlo-based error analysis. An example of HR Ag 3d spectra for CEHCz-EHPDI layer surfaces is shown in Figure 8. The characteristic peaks correspond to Ag 3d5/2–Ag 3d3/2 spin-orbit components. The peak separation of 6 eV is in good agreement with the spin-orbit splitting separation value for metallic Ag [69]. In the Ag 3d spectra of the corresponding PL layers, no peaks indicating any Ag presence were found. The Ag 3d5/2 peak positions (BEs) in the Ag 3d spectra of the hybrid layers are in good agreement or slightly up-shifted (<0.1 eV) compared with the Ag 3d5/2 BE value of 368.28 eV for the metallic Ag. The most pronounced up-shifts were observed for the HL2 layers with the highest coverages and could be explained by charge redistribution at the surface and interface [70]. The explanation of the slight BE up-shifts was also supported by the AP values. The HR Ag 3d spectra were deconvoluted into two Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 main components and additional symmetrical lines corresponding to the satellites analogously to the metallic Ag spectrum. The HR Ag 3d spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI hybrid layer surfaces exhibited similar features as the HR Ag 3d spectra of CFC8-EHPDI hybrid layer surfaces, which are analyzed in detail in our previous work [21]. The satellites S1 and S3, which are separated by ca. 1.5 eV relative to the main Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 peaks, respectively, can be interpreted as an emission process associated with an atomic-like pure p-screening. The S2 and S4 satellites, separated by ca. 3.5 eV relative to Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 BEs, respectively, are associated with the plasmon loss features. The S5 satellite separated ca. 12 eV from Ag 3d5/2 BE, which corresponds to the 4d → 5p shake-up [71,72,73].
The HR C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s spectra of PL and HL layer surfaces for CEHCz-EHPDI are shown in Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11. The differences in modeling the spectra of the CEHCz-EHPDI and CFC8-EHPDI layers are in the deconvolution of the C 1s and N 1s spectra due to the difference in the D unit. The set of chemically shifted components with different BEs corresponding to the different chemical states of carbons increased in HR C 1s spectrum analysis due to the different environment of the N atom in the carbazole unit compared to the fluorene unit. In the modeling of the C 1s core-level spectra of the pristine layers, the component areas were constrained to correspond to the chemical structure of the copolymer repeat units.
The HR C 1s spectra of the CEHCz-EHPDI layers, which are displayed in Figure 9, were deconvoluted into 5 components corresponding to aromatic C sp2, aliphatic C sp3, C–N sp2, C–N sp3, and C=O groups, and π-π* satellite components, which typically appear in the XPS spectra of aromatic compounds. In the HR spectra of the PL layers, the component peak maxima are located at 284.9 eV (aromatic C sp2), 285.3 eV (aliphatic C sp3), 285.8 eV (C–N sp2), 286.3 eV (C–N sp3), and 288.4 eV (O=C–N), which is in good agreement with the data reported in the literature [74,75,76]. The peak assigned to the shake-up excitations associated with the aromatic C sp2 is located at approximately 287.3 eV, which also agrees well with that observed in the spectra of PDI derivatives [77,78]. The other weaker peaks at higher BEs are associated with shake-up phenomena—π-π* satellite peaks of C=O and aromatic C sp2 [76,77,78,79]. A decrease in the main peak area and an increase in the satellite/main peak area ratios are observed in the spectra of the hybrid layers, similar to the HR C 1s spectra of CFC8-EHPDI HL layers as analyzed in detail in our previous work [21].
The HR N 1s spectra of the PL layers of the CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer are displayed in Figure 10. They have to be modeled with four components. Compared to modeling the CFC8-EHPDI spectra, two additional components are required due to the N atom in the carbazole unit. The components with maxima at 400.3 and 400.6 eV are assigned to N–C in carbazole D units and N–C=O in PDI A units, respectively [76]. The smaller peaks at higher BE of approximately 403 and 406 eV represent π-π* satellite features of PDI and carbazole units, respectively, which are characteristic of nitrogen-containing aromatic polymers. In the HR N 1s spectra of the hybrid layers, the components corresponding to the C–N and N–C=O groups also dominate, but the intensity of both peaks decreased compared with that in the spectra of the corresponding PL layers. An additional component at a lower BE in the N 1s energy region, which is influenced by the Ag 3d photoelectron losses, can be assigned to the Ag 3d core line satellite (bulk plasmon) [71]. The contribution of the satellite component increases with increasing Ag 3d doublet peaks, i.e., it is higher in HL2 layers with higher Ag-NP coverages than in HL1 layers.
The HR O 1s spectra of the CEHCz-EHPDI layers displayed in Figure 11 were deconvoluted into four components. The main contribution, with a maximum at 531.68 eV, is assigned to the C=O of the imide groups in the copolymer PDI unit, and the peak at 533.3 eV to the shake-up [80]. The other two components originate from air contamination by adsorbed water (maximum at ca. 532.4 eV) and oxygen (maximum at ca. 537.3 eV) [81,82,83,84]. The air contamination content differs for the PL and corresponding HL layers. It is higher for the PL1 than PL2 layers, as is evident from the comparison of the corresponding component peak areas. The relative area of the peak corresponding to the adsorbed water is higher in the PL1 spectrum than that in the PL2 spectrum, which is consistent with the quantitative analysis, where a higher amount of oxygen was evaluated for PL1 than for PL2. In the HR O 1s spectra of the hybrid layers, the main peak area assigned to the C=O of the imide groups and the adsorbed H2O peak area decreased, while an increase in the satellite/main peak area ratio is observed. The detailed analysis of the HR spectra of the CFC8-EHPDI PL and HL spectra given in our previous paper also revealed differences in the air contamination contributions, but the main features exhibit the same character.
The atomic surface Ag concentration using traditional XPS quantification analysis gave values of 15 and 23% for CEHCz-EHPDI HL1 and HL2 layers, respectively, which are higher values than those for CFC8-EHPDI HL1 (12%) and HL2 (19%) layers. The results correlate well with the results of the Ag-NP coverage values.

4. Conclusions

The effects of the D unit on the formation of Ag-NPs on CEHCz-EHPDI and CFC8-EHPDI copolymer layers during reduction processes were studied. The absorption spectra of the hybrid layers of the CEHCz-EHPDI with the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D units and the CFC8-EHPDI with the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D units differ. The differences in absorption agree with the differences in the Ag-NP diameters and coverages evaluated from the SEM images. For the copolymer CEHCz-EHPDI with the 9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole D units possessing the stronger donor character, larger diameters were evaluated for the HL1 layers prepared at the first reduction process than for the HL2 layers prepared at the second reduction compared to the copolymer CFC8-EHPDI with the 9,9-dioctylfluorene D units, where larger diameters were determined for the HL2 layers prepared at potentials corresponding to the second reduction than those for the HL1 layers prepared at the first reduction process. Hybrid layers made of CEHCz-EHPDI exhibited higher Ag-NP surface coverages, corresponding to higher atomic Ag concentrations, than hybrid layers made of CFC8-EHPDI. Analysis of the wide and HR XPS spectra proved the metallic state of the Ag-NPs. The hybrid layers with various Ag-NP coverages up to 41% exhibited significantly higher light absorption than pristine layers due to the plasmonic effects of Ag-NPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.C.; methodology, V.C. and Y.K.; formal analysis, V.C., S.E. and V.P.; investigation, V.C., S.E., V.P. and D.V.; resources, V.C., Y.K. and D.V.; writing—original draft preparation, V.C.; writing—review and editing, V.C., Y.K. and D.V.; visualization, V.C. and S.E.; supervision, V.C.; project administration, V.C.; funding acquisition, V.C. and Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Czech Science Foundation, grant number 20-15498J, and the National Research Foundation of Korea, grant number NRF-2019K2A9A1A06071525.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Czech Science Foundation (grant 20-15498J) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant NRF-2019K2A9A1A06071525) for supporting this work under the framework of the international cooperation program, and O. Pop-Georgievski for XPS data acquisition.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Q.; Zheng, S.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Han, L. Modified emission of polymer films by ultrathin Ag nanoparticle films. Vacuum 2018, 157, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, J.; Liu, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, F.; Zhang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Yao, Z.; Tang, X.; Du, J.; Zang, Z.; et al. Enhanced single-mode lasers of all-inorganic perovskite nanocube by localized surface plasmonic effect from Au nanoparticles. J. Lumin. 2019, 208, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wu, X.; Jiang, X.-F.; Hu, X.; Zhang, D.-F.; Li, S.; Yao, X.; Liu, W.; Yip, H.-L.; Tang, Z.; Xu, Q.-H. Highly stable enhanced near-infrared amplified spontaneous emission in solution-processed perovskite films by employing polymer and gold nanorods. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fusella, M.A.; Saramak, R.; Bushati, R.; Menon, V.M.; Weaver, M.S.; Thompson, N.J.; Brown, J.J. Plasmonic enhancement of stability and brightness in organic light-emitting devices. Nature 2020, 585, 379–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shamjid, P.; Abhijith, T.; Vivek, P.; Joel, C.; Reddy, V. Plasmonic effects of Ag nanoparticles for absorption enhancement in polymer solar cells with MoO3 passivation layer. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2019, 560, 174–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nair, A.T.; Palappra, S.; Reddy, V. Multi-positional silver nanostructures for high absorption enhancement in polymer solar cells. Org. Electron. 2019, 73, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maake, P.J.; Bolokang, A.S.; Arendse, C.J.; Vohra, V.; Iwuoha, E.I.; Motaung, D.E. Metal oxides and noble metals application in organic solar cells. Sol. Energy 2020, 207, 347–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ginting, R.T.; Kaur, S.; Lim, D.-K.; Kim, J.-M.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kang, J.-W. Plasmonic Effect of Gold Nanostars in Highly Efficient Organic and Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 36111–36118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karakurt, O.; Alemdar, E.; Erer, M.C.; Cevher, D.; Gulmez, S.; Taylan, U.; Cevher, S.C.; Ozsoy, G.H.; Ortac, B.; Cirpan, A. Boosting the efficiency of organic solar cells via plasmonic gold nanoparticles and thiol functionalized conjugated polymer. Dye. Pigment. 2022, 208, 110818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sophia, J.; Muralidharan, G. Preparation of vinyl polymer stabilized silver nanospheres for electro-analytical determination of H2O2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 193, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ponnaiah, S.K.; Periakaruppan, P.; Vellaichamy, B. New Electrochemical Sensor Based on a Silver-Doped Iron Oxide Nanocomposite Coupled with Polyaniline and Its Sensing Application for Picomolar-Level Detection of Uric Acid in Human Blood and Urine Samples. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 122, 3037–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, R.; Xu, Y.; Sors, T.; Irudayaraj, J.; Ren, W.; Wang, R. Impedimetric detection of bacteria by using a microfluidic chip and silver nanoparticle based signal enhancement. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loiseau, A.; Asila, V.; Boitel-Aullen, G.; Lam, M.; Salmain, M.; Boujday, S. Silver-Based Plasmonic Nanoparticles for and Their Use in Biosensing. Biosensors 2019, 9, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Yeshchenko, O.A.; Malynych, S.Z.; Polomarev, S.O.; Galabura, Y.; Chumanov, G.; Luzinov, I. Towards sensor applications of a polymer/Ag nanoparticle nanocomposite film. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 8498–8506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Li, J.; Li, Y.; Shahzad, S.A.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, M.; Yu, C. Fluorescence turn-on detection of glucose via the Ag nanoparticle mediated release of a perylene probe. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6354–6356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Feng, Y.; Li, K.; Jian, H.; Zhang, H. Upshift of the d Band Center toward the Fermi Level for Promoting Silver Ion Release, Bacteria Inactivation, and Wound Healing of Alloy Silver Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 12224–12231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lam, W.T.; Babra, T.S.; Smith, J.H.D.; Bagley, M.C.; Spencer, J.; Wright, E.; Greenland, B.W. Synthesis and Evaluation of a Silver Nanoparticle/Polyurethane Composite That Exhibits Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2. Polymers 2022, 14, 4172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ratvijitvech, T.; Na Pombejra, S. Antibacterial efficiency of microporous hypercrosslinked polymer conjugated with biosynthesized silver nanoparticles from Aspergillus niger. Mater. Today Commun. 2021, 28, 102617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zahoor, M.; Nazir, N.; Iftikhar, M.; Naz, S.; Zekker, I.; Burlakovs, J.; Uddin, F.; Kamran, A.W.; Kallistova, A.; Pimenov, N.; et al. A Review on Silver Nanoparticles: Classification, Various Methods of Synthesis, and Their Potential Roles in Biomedical Applications and Water Treatment. Water 2021, 13, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laghrib, F.; Ajermoun, N.; Bakasse, M.; Lahrich, S.; El Mhammedi, M. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles assisted by chitosan and its application to catalyze the reduction of 4-nitroaniline. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 752–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cimrová, V.; Eom, S.; Pokorná, V.; Kang, Y.; Výprachtický, D. Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Homogenous Silver Nanoparticle Coverage for Photonic Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Aivali, S.; Tsimpouki, L.; Anastasopoulos, C.; Kallitsis, J.K. Synthesis and Optoelectronic Characterization of Perylene Diimide-Quinoline Based Small Molecules. Molecules 2019, 24, 4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Cheng, P.; Zhao, X.; Zhan, X. Perylene Diimide-Based Oligomers and Polymers for Organic Optoelectronics. Accounts Mater. Res. 2022, 3, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhan, X.; Facchetti, A.; Barlow, S.; Marks, T.J.; Ratner, M.A.; Wasielewski, M.R.; Marder, S.R. Rylene and Related Diimides for Organic Electronics. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 268–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tozlu, C.; Kus, M.; Can, M.; Ersöz, M. Solution processed white light photodetector based N, N′-di (2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,9,10-perylene diimide thin film phototransistor. Thin Solid Films 2014, 569, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jung, J.H.; Yoon, M.J.; Lim, J.W.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, K.E.; Kim, D.H.; Oh, J.H. High-Performance UV-Vis-NIR Phototransistors Based on Single-Crystalline Organic Semiconductor-Gold Hybrid Nanomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1604528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rekab, W.; Stoeckel, M.-A.; El Gemayel, M.; Gobbi, M.; Orgiu, E.; Samorì, P. High-Performance Phototransistors Based on PDIF-CN2 Solution-Processed Single Fiber and Multifiber Assembly. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9829–9838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chen, H.Z.; Ling, M.M.; Mo, X.; Shi, M.M.; Wang, M.; Bao, Z. Air Stable n-Channel Organic Semiconductors for Thin Film Transistors Based on Fluorinated Derivatives of Perylene Diimides. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.; Zheng, Y.; Yan, H.; Facchetti, A. Naphthalenedicarboximide- vs Perylenedicarboximide-Based Copolymers. Synthesis and Semiconducting Properties in Bottom-Gate N-Channel Organic Transistors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hesse, H.C.; Weickert, J.; Hundschell, C.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K.; Nickel, B.; Mozer, A.J.; Schmidt-Mende, L. Perylene Sensitization of Fullerenes for Improved Performance in Organic Photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiong, Y.; Wu, B.; Zheng, X.; Zhao, Z.; Deng, P.; Lin, M.; Tang, B.; Ong, B.S. Novel Dimethylmethylene-Bridged Triphenylamine-PDI Acceptor for Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhan, X.; Tan, Z.; Domercq, B.; An, Z.; Zhang, X.; Barlow, S.; Li, Y.; Zhu, D.; Kippelen, B.; Marder, S.R. A High-Mobility Electron-Transport Polymer with Broad Absorption and Its Use in Field-Effect Transistors and All-Polymer Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7246–7247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, H.Y.; Peng, B.; Wei, W. Solar Cells Based on Perylene Bisimide Derivatives. Prog. Chem. 2008, 20, 1751–1760. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhou, E.; Cong, J.; Wei, Q.; Tajima, K.; Yang, C.; Hashimoto, K. All-Polymer Solar Cells from Perylene Diimide Based Copolymers: Material Design and Phase Separation Control. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2799–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kozma, E.; Catellani, M. Perylene diimides based materials for organic solar cells. Dye. Pigment. 2013, 98, 160–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cann, J.; Dayneko, S.; Sun, J.-P.; Hendsbee, A.D.; Hill, I.G.; Welch, G.C. N-Annulated perylene diimide dimers: Acetylene linkers as a strategy for controlling structural conformation and the impact on physical, electronic, optical and photovoltaic properties. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 2074–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Welsh, T.A.; Laventure, A.; Welch, G.C. Direct (Hetero)Arylation for the Synthesis of Molecular Materials: Coupling Thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione with Perylene Diimide to Yield Novel Non-Fullerene Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells. Molecules 2018, 23, 931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lin, Y.-C.; Chen, C.-H.; She, N.-Z.; Juan, C.-Y.; Chang, B.; Li, M.-H.; Wang, H.-C.; Cheng, H.-W.; Yabushita, A.; Yang, Y.; et al. Twisted-graphene-like perylene diimide with dangling functional chromophores as tunable small-molecule acceptors in binary-blend active layers of organic photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 20510–20517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, Y.-C.; She, N.-Z.; Chen, C.-H.; Yabushita, A.; Lin, H.; Li, M.-H.; Chang, B.; Hsueh, T.-F.; Tsai, B.-S.; Chen, P.-T.; et al. Perylene Diimide-Fused Dithiophenepyrroles with Different End Groups as Acceptors for Organic Photovoltaics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 37990–38003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kalita, A.; Hussain, S.; Malik, A.H.; Subbarao, N.V.V.; Iyer, P.K. Vapor phase sensing of ammonia at the sub-ppm level using a perylene diimide thin film device. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 10767–10774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, J.; Chang, T.; Fang, C.; Shangguan, D. A turn-on fluorescent sensor for zinc and cadmium ions based on perylene tetracarboxylic diimide. Anal. 2013, 138, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yue, E.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, R.; Ji, H.; Li, J.; Che, Y.; Zhao, J. Fluorescent bilayer nanocoils assembled from an asymmetric perylene diimide molecule with ultrasensitivity for amine vapors. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 13596–13599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, N.; Wang, C.; Bunes, B.R.; Zhang, Y.; Slattum, P.M.; Yang, X.; Zang, L. Chemical Self-Doping of Organic Nanoribbons for High Conductivity and Potential Application as Chemiresistive Sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 12360–12368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Che, Y.; Yang, X.; Liu, G.; Yu, C.; Ji, H.; Zuo, J.; Zhao, J.; Zang, L. Ultrathin n-Type Organic Nanoribbons with High Photoconductivity and Application in Optoelectronic Vapor Sensing of Explosives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5743–5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Roy, B.; Noguchi, T.; Yoshihara, D.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Dawn, A.; Shinkai, S. Nucleotide sensing with a perylene-based molecular receptor via amplified fluorescence quenching. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jones, B.A.; Facchetti, A.; Wasielewski, M.R.; Marks, T.J. Tuning Orbital Energetics in Arylene Diimide Semiconductors. Materials Design for Ambient Stability of n-Type Charge Transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15259–15278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Russ, B.; Robb, M.J.; Brunetti, F.G.; Miller, P.L.; Perry, E.E.; Patel, S.N.; Ho, V.; Chang, W.B.; Urban, J.J.; Chabinyc, M.L.; et al. Power Factor Enhancement in Solution-Processed Organic n-Type Thermoelectrics Through Molecular Design. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3473–3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liu, M.; Yang, J.; Lang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, E.; Liu, Z.; Guo, F.; Zhao, L. Fused Perylene Diimide-Based Polymeric Acceptors for Efficient All-Polymer Solar Cells. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7559–7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zink-Lorre, N.; Font-Sanchis, E.; Sastre-Santos, Á.; Fernández-Lázaro, F. Perylenediimides as more than just non-fullerene acceptors: Versatile components in organic, hybrid and perovskite solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3824–3838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shi, Q.; Wu, J.; Wu, X.; Peng, A.; Huang, H. Perylene Diimide-Based Conjugated Polymers for All-Polymer Solar Cells. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 12510–12522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yin, Z.; Wei, J.; Zheng, Q. Interfacial Materials for Organic Solar Cells: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Meng, X.; Ho, C.H.Y.; Xiao, S.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, T.; Hu, C.; Lin, H.; Yang, Y.; So, S.K.; Yang, S. Molecular design enabled reduction of interface trap density affords highly efficient and stable perovskite solar cells with over 83% fill factor. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cimrová, V.; Výprachtický, D.; Pokorná, V.; Babičová, P. Donor–acceptor copolymers with 1,7-regioisomers of N,N′-dialkylperylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide as materials for photonics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 14678–14692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Fairley, N.; Fernandez, V.; Richard-Plouet, M.; Guillot-Deudon, C.; Walton, J.; Smith, E.; Flahaut, D.; Greiner, M.; Biesinger, M.; Tougaard, S.; et al. Systematic and collaborative approach to problem solving using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2021, 5, 100112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tougaard, S. Universality Classes of Inelastic Electron Scattering Cross-sections. Surf. Interface Anal. 1997, 25, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Slistan-Grijalva, A.; Herrera-Urbina, R.; Rivas-Silva, J.; Ávalos-Borja, M.; Castillón-Barraza, F.; Posada-Amarillas, A. Classical theoretical characterization of the surface plasmon absorption band for silver spherical nanoparticles suspended in water and ethylene glycol. Physica E 2005, 27, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chapman, R.; Mulvaney, P. Electro-optical shifts in silver nanoparticle films. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 349, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ponelyte, S.; Palevicius, A.; Guobiene, A.; Puiso, J.; Prosycevas, I. Investigation of optical properties of Ag: PMMA nanocomposite structures. Micro-Optics 2010, 7716, 505–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Amirjani, A.; Firouzi, F.; Haghshenas, D.F. Predicting the Size of Silver Nanoparticles from Their Optical Properties. Plasmonics 2020, 15, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Persson, B.; Liebsch, A. Optical properties of inhomogeneous media. Solid State Commun. 1982, 44, 1637–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kreibig, U.; Genzel, L. Optical absorption of small metallic particles. Surf. Sci. 1985, 156, 678–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Quinten, M.; Kreibig, U. Optical properties of aggregates of small metal particles. Surf. Sci. 1986, 172, 557–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Parnklang, T.; Lertvachirapaiboon, C.; Pienpinijtham, P.; Wongravee, K.; Thammacharoen, C.; Ekgasit, S. H2O2-triggered shape transformation of silver nanospheres to nanoprisms with controllable longitudinal LSPR wavelengths. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 12886–12894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheon, J.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Park, W.H. Facile Interpretation of Catalytic Reaction between Organic Dye Pollutants and Silver Nanoparticles with Different Shapes. J. Nanomater. 2019, 2019, 3257892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Y.; Jordan, R.G.; Qiu, S.L. Electronic structures of ordered Ag-Mg alloys. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 4478–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tougaard, S. Improved XPS analysis by visual inspection of the survey spectrum. Surf. Interface Anal. 2018, 50, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ferraria, A.M.; Carapeto, A.P.; do Rego, A.M.B. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Silver salts revisited. Vacuum 2012, 86, 1988–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dolatkhah, A.; Jani, P.; Wilson, L.D. Redox-Responsive Polymer Template as an Advanced Multifunctional Catalyst Support for Silver Nanoparticles. Langmuir 2018, 34, 10560–10568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moulder, J.F.; Stickle, W.F.; ‘Sobol, P.E.; Bomben, K.D. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. In A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data; Chastain, J., Ed.; Perkin-Elmer Corporation Physical Electronics Division: Eden Prairie, MN, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  70. Egelhoff, W. Core-level binding-energy shifts at surfaces and in solids. Surf. Sci. Rep. 1987, 6, 253–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. A Leiro, J.; Minni, E.; Suoninen, E. Study of plasmon structure in XPS spectra of silver and gold. J. Phys. F Met. Phys. 1983, 13, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Eckardt, H.; Fritsche, L. Theoretical explanation of the XPS satellite structure of elementary metals: Application to Ag. Solid State Commun. 1985, 54, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pauly, N.; Yubero, F.; Tougaard, S. Quantitative analysis of satellite structures in XPS spectra of gold and silver. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 383, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, L.Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; Lim, C.H.; Chen, Y.; Neoh, K.-G.; Kang, E.-T.; Fu, G.D. Functionalization of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets via stacking interactions with the fluorescent and water-soluble perylene bisimide-containing polymers. Polymer 2011, 52, 2376–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ren, L.; Wang, M.; Lu, S.; Pan, L.; Xiong, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, Q.; Li, Y.; Yu, J. Tailoring Thermal Transport Properties of Graphene Paper by Structural Engineering. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Beamson, G.; Briggs, D. High Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers: The Scienta ESCA300 Database. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70, A25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Scholz, M.; Schmidt, R.; Krause, S.; Schöll, A.; Reinert, F.; Würthner, F. Electronic structure of epitaxial thin films of bay-substituted perylene bisimide dyes. Appl. Phys. A 2009, 95, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zahn, D.R.T.; Gavrila, G.N.; Salvan, G. Electronic and Vibrational Spectroscopies Applied to Organic/Inorganic Interfaces. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1161–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Scholl, A.; Zou, Y.; Jung, M.; Schmidt, T.; Fink, R.; Umbach, E. Line shapes and satellites in high-resolution x-ray photoelectron spectra of large pi-conjugated organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 121, 10260–10267. [Google Scholar]
  80. Emmanouil, K.; Gawrys, P.; Zagorska, M.; Kennou, S. Electronic properties of a perylene bisimide interfaced with gold or aluminum: The influence of the substrate. Microelectron. Eng. 2013, 112, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Erbahar, D.; Susi, T.; Rocquefelte, X.; Bittencourt, C.; Scardamaglia, M.; Blaha, P.; Guttmann, P.; Rotas, G.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Zhu, X.; et al. Spectromicroscopy of C60 and azafullerene C59N: Identifying surface adsorbed water. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Yamamoto, S.; Bluhm, H.; Andersson, K.; Ketteler, G.; Ogasawara, H.; Salmeron, M.; Nilsson, A. In situ x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of water on metals and oxides at ambient conditions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2008, 20, 184025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Salmeron, M. From Surfaces to Interfaces: Ambient Pressure XPS and Beyond. Top. Catal. 2018, 61, 2044–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Onoe, J.; Takeuchi, K.; Ohno, K.; Kawazoe, Y. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of air-exposed C60 films: Origin of the O1s core peak. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1998, 16, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers with various donor units: poly[N,N′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide-1,7-diyl-alt-9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole-2,7-diyl]s (CEHCz-EHPDI) and poly[N,N′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide-1,7-diyl-alt-9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,7-diyl]s (CFC8-EHPDI). The electron-donor (D) and electron-acceptor (A) units are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the donor-acceptor (D-A) copolymers with various donor units: poly[N,N′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide-1,7-diyl-alt-9-(2-ethylhexyl)carbazole-2,7-diyl]s (CEHCz-EHPDI) and poly[N,N′-bis(2-ethylhexyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxydiimide-1,7-diyl-alt-9,9-dioctylfluorene-2,7-diyl]s (CFC8-EHPDI). The electron-donor (D) and electron-acceptor (A) units are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g001
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g002 550
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2—blue) layers and hybrid (HL1, HL2—red) layers prepared at (a) –1 V (HL1) and (b) –1.5 V (HL2) vs. Ag/Ag+ corresponding to the first and second reduction processes, respectively. Absorption spectra as measured during Ag doping are also displayed (black dashed). Difference spectra (difference in the absorbance (A) of hybrid AHL and pristine APL layers: Adif = AHL − APL) are displayed by green curves.
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2—blue) layers and hybrid (HL1, HL2—red) layers prepared at (a) –1 V (HL1) and (b) –1.5 V (HL2) vs. Ag/Ag+ corresponding to the first and second reduction processes, respectively. Absorption spectra as measured during Ag doping are also displayed (black dashed). Difference spectra (difference in the absorbance (A) of hybrid AHL and pristine APL layers: Adif = AHL − APL) are displayed by green curves.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g002
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of absorption (red) and difference (green) spectra for HL1 and HL2 layers made of CEHCz-EHPDI (solid) and CFC8-EHPDI (dashed) prepared at potentials corresponding to the (a) first (HL1) and (b) second (HL2) reduction processes. The difference spectrum is the difference in the absorbance (A) of hybrid AHL and pristine APL layers: Adif = AHL − APL.
Figure 3. Comparison of absorption (red) and difference (green) spectra for HL1 and HL2 layers made of CEHCz-EHPDI (solid) and CFC8-EHPDI (dashed) prepared at potentials corresponding to the (a) first (HL1) and (b) second (HL2) reduction processes. The difference spectrum is the difference in the absorbance (A) of hybrid AHL and pristine APL layers: Adif = AHL − APL.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g003
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g004 550
Figure 4. SEM images of HL1 hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the first reduction process.
Figure 4. SEM images of HL1 hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the first reduction process.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g004
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g005 550
Figure 5. SEM images of HL2 hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the second reduction process.
Figure 5. SEM images of HL2 hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the second reduction process.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g005
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g006 550
Figure 6. Normal distribution functions of the Ag-NP diameters evaluated from SEM images of hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the first (HL1) and second (HL2) reduction processes.
Figure 6. Normal distribution functions of the Ag-NP diameters evaluated from SEM images of hybrid layers of (a) CEHCz-EHPDI and (b) CFC8-EHPDI copolymers prepared at the first (HL1) and second (HL2) reduction processes.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g006
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g007 550
Figure 7. XPS-wide spectra of the pristine (PL-black) and hybrid layers of CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer prepared at the first (HL1-blue) and second (HL2-red) reduction processes.
Figure 7. XPS-wide spectra of the pristine (PL-black) and hybrid layers of CEHCz-EHPDI copolymer prepared at the first (HL1-blue) and second (HL2-red) reduction processes.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g007
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g008 550
Figure 8. High-resolution Ag 3d spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Figure 8. High-resolution Ag 3d spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g008
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g009 550
Figure 9. High-resolution C 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Figure 9. High-resolution C 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g009
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g010 550
Figure 10. High-resolution N 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Figure 10. High-resolution N 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g010
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g011 550
Figure 11. High-resolution O 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Figure 11. High-resolution O 1s spectra of CEHCz-EHPDI pristine (PL1, PL2) and hybrid (HL1, HL2) layer surfaces, including components. Normalized residuals are shown below the spectra.
Nanomaterials 13 01830 g011
Table
Table 1. Absorption maxima of hybrid (HL1, HL2) layers (λmax), maxima of difference spectra (λdifmax), Ag-NP coverage (AAg-NP), and parameters of the normal distribution (d0, σ). The main maxima are printed in bold.
Table 1. Absorption maxima of hybrid (HL1, HL2) layers (λmax), maxima of difference spectra (λdifmax), Ag-NP coverage (AAg-NP), and parameters of the normal distribution (d0, σ). The main maxima are printed in bold.
CopolymerLayerλmax
(nm)		λdifmax
(nm)		AAg-NP
(%)		d0
(nm)		σ
(nm)
CEHCz-EHPDIHL1347, 4554562768.713.1
HL2352, 384, 4453944141.411.6
CFC8-EHPDIHL1335, 4314252041.010.1
HL2336, 472, 5465143957.310.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cimrová, V.; Eom, S.; Pokorná, V.; Kang, Y.; Výprachtický, D. Effects of the Donor Unit on the Formation of Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121830

AMA Style

Cimrová V, Eom S, Pokorná V, Kang Y, Výprachtický D. Effects of the Donor Unit on the Formation of Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(12):1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121830

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cimrová, Věra, Sangwon Eom, Veronika Pokorná, Youngjong Kang, and Drahomír Výprachtický. 2023. "Effects of the Donor Unit on the Formation of Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Silver Nanoparticles" Nanomaterials 13, no. 12: 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121830

APA Style

Cimrová, V., Eom, S., Pokorná, V., Kang, Y., & Výprachtický, D. (2023). Effects of the Donor Unit on the Formation of Hybrid Layers of Donor-Acceptor Copolymers with Silver Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials, 13(12), 1830. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13121830

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop