An Exploratory Study of the Use of the Internet and E-Government by Older Adults in the Countryside of Brazil
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Government Digital Services
2. Background
2.1. Older Adults and Technology
2.2. Usability and Older Adults
2.3. Digital Divide and E-Government
2.4. Related Work
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample
3.2. Research Instrument
4. Survey Results
4.1. Internet Use
4.2. Perceptions of the Internet
4.3. Use of Government Websites
4.4. Quality of Government Websites
4.5. Government Services
5. Discussion
5.1. Comparative Analysis with Choudrie et al.’s Study
5.2. Comparison with Other Studies
5.3. Recommendations
5.4. Limitations and Threats to Validity
6. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Questionnaire Used in the Study
- Em qual cidade você reside? (In what city/town do you live?)
- Quantos anos você tem? (How old are you?)
- Qual é o seu sexo? (What is your sex?)
- Qual é a sua Cor ou Raça/Etnia?—As categorias utilizadas estão de acordo com a atual classificação do IBGE, a respeito do quesito “cor ou raça”—como um critério misto de fenótipo e ancestralidade. Answers: Parda, Branca, Negra, Indígena, Amarela(What is your color or race/ethnic background?—The categories used are in accordance with the IBGE classification concerning que aspect “color or race”—as a mixed criterion considering phenotype and ancestry. Answers: Brown, White, Black, Indigenous, Yellow).
- Qual é o seu status atual de emprego?—Answers: Empregado, Autônomo, Desempregado, Aposentado.(What is your current employment status?—Answers: Employed, Self-employed, Unemployed, Retired.)
- Qual é o seu nível de escolaridade?—Answers: Ensino Fundamental Incompleto, Ensino Fundamental Completo, Ensino Médio, Graduação, Pós-graduação, Nenhum(What is your education level?—Answers: Incomplete Primary Education, Primary Education, High School, University-level degree, Postgraduate degree, None)
- Como você descreveria seu nível de conhecimento e experiência no uso de computadores?—Answers: Eu não tenho conhecimento ou experiência com computadores; Eu sou um usuário com pouco conhecimento e experiência; Eu sou um usuário com muito conhecimento e experiência; Outro.(How would you describe your level of knowledge and experience in the use of computers?—Answers: I do not have knowledge or experience with computers; I have little knowledge or experience; I have extensive knowledge and experience; Other.)
- Você tem acesso à Internet, se necessário?—Se for necessário o uso da Internet por você em algum momento, existe acesso fácil a conexão à Internet?—Answer: Sim, Não(Do you have Internet access if needed?—If you need to use the Internet at some point, is there easy access to an Internet connection?—Answer: Yes, No)
- Onde está o seu principal acesso à Internet?—Se você utiliza a Internet, em que local está o seu principal acesso? Se não utilizar marque a opção “Nenhum local”. Answers: Em casa; No trabalho; Tanto em casa como no trabalho; Nenhum local; Outro.(Where is your main Internet access?—If you use the Internet, where is your main access? If you do not use it, check the option “No location”.—Answers: At home; At work; Both at home and at work; No location; Other)
- Com que frequência você usa a Internet?—Com qual frequência você utiliza a Internet no seu cotidiano? Se não utilizar marque a opção “Nenhuma”. Answers: Diariamente; Semanalmente; Mensalmente; Ocasionalmente; Nenhuma;(How often do you use the Internet?—How often do you use the Internet in your daily life? If you do not use it, mark the option “None”. Answers: Daily; Weekly; Monthly; Occasionally; None;)
- Qual o principal meio para acesso à Internet? Qual dos dispositivos é o mais utilizado na hora de se conectar à Internet? Se não utilizar marque a opção “Nenhum”. Answers: Computador; Tablet; Smartphone/Celular; Outro; Nenhum(What is the main means of accessing the Internet? Which device is the most used when connecting to the Internet? If you do not use it, mark the option “None”. Answers: Computer; Tablet; Smartphone/Cell Phone; Other; None)
- Qual dos dispositivos você possui? (Mais de uma opção é permitida)—Answers: Computador; Tablet; Smartphone/Celular; Outro; Nenhum(Which device do you own? (More than one option is allowed)—Answers: Computer; Tablet; Smartphone/Mobile Phone; Other; None)
- Quanto à facilidade de uso, qual dos dispositivos abaixo é mais fácil manusear? Answers: Computador; Tablet; Smartphone/Celular; Nenhum(As for ease of use, which of the devices below is easier to handle? Answers: Computer; Tablet; Smartphone/Mobile Phone; None)
- A lista de palavras a seguir foi usada para descrever a Internet. Por favor, indique em que medida você concorda com essas visões, marcando a caixa relevante. Answers: Discordo totalmente, Discordo, Nem concordo nem discordo, Concordo, Concordo totalmente. Items: Útil, Relevante, Conveniente, Segura, Informativa, Capacitadora, Confiável, Acessível, Rápida, Na moda, Fácil de usar, Adaptável ao estilo de vida(The following list of words has been used to describe the Internet. Please indicate the extent to which you agree with these views by checking the relevant box. Answers: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree, Agree, Strongly agree. Items: Useful, Relevant, Convenient, Secure, Informative, Empowering, Reliable, Affordable, Fast, Fashionable, Easy to Use, Lifestyle Adaptable)
- Qual é o seu método preferido de interagir ou se comunicar com o governo? Answers: Contato cara a cara com uma equipe do governo; Através do uso do site do governo; Por intermédio de e-mail; Serviço telefônico; Carta escrita; Outro.(What is your preferred method of interacting or communicating with the government? Answers: Face-to-face contact with government staff; Through the use of the government website; Via email; Telephone service; Written letter; Other.)
- Você já visitou algum site do governo? Sites de prefeituras, governo do estado, governo federal ou outras instituições para fins governamentais. Exemplos: Detran, Receita Federal, INSS, TRE, e outros. Answers: Sim, Não.(Have you ever visited any government websites? Sites of city halls, state government, federal government or other institutions for government purposes. Examples: Detran, Federal Revenue Service, INSS, TRE, and others. Answers: Yes, No.)
- Qual foi o propósito da sua visita ao site do governo? (Mais de uma opção é permitida). Answers: Pagar taxas e tributos (Por exemplo imposto municipal, seguro, guias de recolhimento, multas e outros); Solicitar um serviço; Procurar informações ou números de contato sobre os serviços do governo;(What was the purpose of your visit to the government website? (More than one option is allowed). Answers: Pay fees and taxes (For example council tax, insurance, collection forms, fines and others); Request a service; Look up information or contact numbers about government services; Make a complaint; Fill out a form; Other.)
- Você achou o site do governo útil para o seu propósito?. Answers: Sim; Não.(Did you find the government website useful for your purpose?. Answers: Yes; No.)
- Você conhece o endereço de algum site do governo? Answers: Sim; Não.(Do you know the address of any government website? Answers: Yes; No)
- Com que frequência você visita sites do governo? Answers: Diariamente; Pelo menos uma vez por semana; Uma vez a cada duas semanas; Mensalmente; Ocasionalmente(How often do you visit government websites? Answers: Daily; At least once a week; Once a fortnight; Monthly; Occasionally.)
- Você acha que usar os sites do governo pode melhorar a comunicação das pessoas com o governo? Answers: Sim; Não.(Do you think that using government websites can improve people’s communication with the government? Answers: Yes; No.)
- A lista a seguir mostra alguns dos serviços / informações disponíveis em sites do governo. Por favor, indique quantas vezes você requer o uso desses tipos de serviços ou informações. Answers: Sempre, Às vezes, Raramente, Nunca. Items: Educação; Saúde; Empregos e carreiras (oportunidades de trabalho, processo seletivo e concursos); Habitação; Segurança e Prevenção; Cultura, esportes e lazer; Obras e infraestrutura; Meio ambiente; Transporte e mobilidade urbana; Assuntos institucionais e comunicação social; Controladoria-geral e Procuradoria-geral do município; Desenvolvimento econômico; Fazenda e governo; Política urbana.(The following list shows some of the services/information available on government websites. Please indicate how often you require the use of these types of services or information. Answers: Always, Sometimes, Rarely, Never. Items: Education; Health; Jobs and careers (job opportunities, selection process and competitions); Housing; Safety and Prevention; Culture, sports and leisure; Works and infrastructure; Environment; Transport and urban mobility; Institutional affairs and media; The Committee of Public Accounts and General Attorney of the municipality; Economic development; Government revenue and customs; Urban policy.)
- Existem outros serviços ou informações relevantes para as suas necessidades que você gostaria de estivessem disponíveis em sites do governo? Por favor, comente abaixo.(Are there other services or information relevant to your needs that you would like to see available on government websites? Please comment below.)
- Por favor, classifique a qualidade do site do seu governo local seguindo sua experiência de usá-lo em relação ao conteúdo da informação. Se você nunca usou o site, selecione N/A. Answers: Muito pobre; Pobre; Médio; Bom; Excelente; N/A. Items: O site fornece informações que se encaixam exatamente nas minhas necessidades; O site fornece informações atualizadas sobre a minha cidade, estado ou país; O site fornece a resposta para a maioria das minhas perguntas; O site fornece informações completas; O site usa palavras que são consistentes e fáceis de entender.(Please rate the quality of your local government website based on your experience using it in terms of information content. If you have never used the site, please select N/A. Answers: Very poor; Poor; Average; Good; Great; N/A. Items: The site provides information that exactly fits my needs; The site provides up-to-date information about my city, state or country; The site provides the answer to most of my questions; The website provides complete information; The site uses words that are consistent and easy to understand.)
- Por favor, avalie a qualidade do site do seu governo local em relação à sua usabilidade. Se você nunca usou o site, selecione N/A. Answers: Muito pobre; Pobre; Médio; Bom; Excelente; N/A. Items: O site é simples de usar, mesmo quando usado pela primeira vez; É fácil encontrar as informações de que preciso no site; Eu gosto da maneira como o site é projetado; O site usa cores que podem ser distinguidas e são boas para os olhos; É muito fácil movimentar o site; O conteúdo do site é bem definido; O site pode ser facilmente usado por pessoas com deficiência; O site tem guias e instruções úteis; As páginas do site, incluindo formulários e documentos, são baixadas rapidamente.(Please rate the quality of your local government website in relation to its usability. If you have never used the site, please select N/A. Answers: Very poor; Poor; Average; Good; Great; N/A. Items: The site is simple to use, even when using it for the first time; It’s easy to find the information I need on the site; I like the way the site is designed; The website uses colors that can be distinguished and are easy on the eyes; It’s very easy to move around the site; The site’s content is well laid out; The site can be easily used by people with disabilities; The website has helpful guides and instructions; Site pages, including forms and documents, download quickly.)
- Por favor, indique sua satisfação geral com a qualidade do site do seu governo local. Answers: 1—Muito insatisfeito; 5—Muito satisfeito.(Please indicate your overall satisfaction with the quality of your local government website. Answers: 1—Very dissatisfied; 5—Very satisfied.)
- Se você não usa ou nunca utilizou sites do governo, qual dos seguintes motivos descreve sua falta de uso? (Mais de uma opção é permitida). Answers: Eu não possuo habilidades no manuseio do computador e da Internet; É muito demorado este meio; Eu prefiro falar com uma pessoa; É muito complexo para usar; Muito difícil encontrar informações; Isso não é adequado para o meu estilo de vida; Eu não me sinto seguro emitindo guias ou pagando taxas e imposto na Internet.(If you do not or have never used government websites, which of the following describes your lack of use? (More than one option is allowed). Answers: I don’t have computer and Internet skills; It is very time-consuming this way; I’d rather talk to one person; It’s too complex to use; Very difficult to find information; This is not suited to my lifestyle; I don’t feel safe issuing guides or paying fees and taxes on the Internet.)
- Quais dos principais serviços oferecidos pelo governo são utilizados por você? Obs.: Independente do meio que é oferecido o serviço (Mais de uma opção é permitida). Answers: Tratamento e abastecimento de água/esgoto, produção e distribuição de energia elétrica, gás e combustíveis; Educação (por exemplo, escolas públicas, universidades públicas, etc); Assistência médica e hospitalar (por exemplo, postos de saúde e hospitais); Distribuição e comercialização de medicamentos e alimentos (por exemplo, farmácia do governo ou farmácia popular); Serviços sociais (por exemplo, habitação pública, assistência social, subsídios alimentares, etc); Tribunais, jurídicos e serviços de emergência (por exemplo, cartórios, bombeiro, polícia, defesa civil, etc); Transporte público (por exemplo, ônibus, metrôs e outros); Telecomunicações; Serviços bancários; Meio ambiente e proteção ambiental.(Which of the main services offered by the government do you use? Obs.: Regardless of the way the service is offered (More than one option is allowed). Answers: Water/sewage treatment and supply, production and distribution of electricity, gas and fuels; Education (e.g., public schools, public universities, etc.); Medical and hospital assistance (for example, health clinics and hospitals); Distribution and marketing of medicines and food (for example, government pharmacy or popular pharmacy); Social services (e.g., public housing, social assistance, food subsidies, etc.); Courts, legal and emergency services (e.g., registry offices, firefighters, police, civil defense, etc.); Public transport (e.g., buses, subways and others); Telecommunications; Bank services; Environment and environmental protection.)
References
- UN, United Nations. World Population Ageing 2017. 2017. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Report.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2022).
- Internet World Stats. Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics. 2022. Available online: https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Brazilian Internet Steering Committee—CGI.br. Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Brazilian Households: ICT Households 2020; Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR, Ed.; CGI.br.: São Paulo, Brazil, 2021; Available online: https://cetic.br/en/pesquisa/domicilios/publicacoes/ (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério Brasil. Available online: https://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- Álvarez-Dardet, S.M.; Lara, B.L.; Pérez-Padilla, J. Older adults and ICT adoption: Analysis of the use and attitudes toward computers in elderly Spanish people. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 110, 106377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zitkus, E.; Langdon, P.; Clarkson, P.J. Gradually including potential users: A tool to counter design exclusions. Appl. Ergon. 2018, 66, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lemos, A.; Lévy, P. O futuro da internet: Em direção a uma ciberdemocracia planetária. São Paulo Paulus 2010, 264. [Google Scholar]
- Lau, T.; Aboulhoson, M.; Lin, C.; Atkin, D.J. Adoption of e-government in three Latin American countries: Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Telecommun. Policy 2008, 32, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.J.; Loo, P. Web 2.0 and E-Government at the Municipal Level. In Proceedings of the 2009 World Congress on Privacy, Security, Trust and the Management of e-Business, Saint John, NB, Canada, 25–27 August 2009; IEEE Computer Society: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudrie, J.; Grey, S.; Tsitsianis, N. Evaluating the digital divide: The Silver Surfer’s perspective. Electron. Gov. Int. J. 2010, 7, 148–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siren, A.; Knudsen, S.G. Older Adults and Emerging Digital Service Delivery: A Mixed Methods Study on Information and Communications Technology Use, Skills, and Attitudes. J. Aging Soc. Policy 2016, 29, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phang, C.W.; Li, Y.; Sutanto, J.; Kankanhalli, A. Senior Citizens’ Adoption of E-Government: In Quest of the Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, USA, 3–6 January 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudrie, J.; Alfalah, A. Older Adults in Households and e-Government services in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A digital Divide Study of Adoption, Use and Diffusion. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference of Information Systems (PACIS) Proceedings, Chiayi, Taiwan, 27 June–1 July 2016; Association of Information Systems: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Molnár, T.; Kő, A.; Mátyus, B. Exploring Usability and Acceptance Factors of m-Government Systems for Elderly. In Proceedings of the Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Lyon, France, 28–31 August 2017; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phang, C.W.; Sutanto, J.; Kankanhalli, A.; Li, Y.; Tan, B.C.; Teo, H.H. Senior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2006, 53, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loach, K. (Director) I, Daniel Blake. Netflix Inc., 2016. Available online: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5168192/ (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Moraes, G.H.S.M. The Elderly And The Electronic Government In Brazil. Electron. Gov. Electron. Particip. 2016, 23, 295–302. [Google Scholar]
- Brazilian Government. Governo Brasileiro Atinge Marca de 1500 Serviços Digitalizados em 34 Meses (Brazilian Government Reaches 1500 Services Digitalized in 34 Months). 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/noticias/governo-brasileiro-atinge-marca-de-1-500-servicos-digitalizados-em-34-meses (accessed on 12 December 2022).
- United Nations. United Nations E-Government Survey 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/publication/2020-united-nations-e-government-survey (accessed on 22 May 2022).
- Becker, S.A. E-Government Visual Accessibility for Older Adult Users. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2004, 22, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez-Morote, R.; Pontones-Rosa, C.; Núñez-Chicharro, M. The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 154, 119973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choudrie, J.; Ghinea, G.; Songonuga, V.N. Silver surfers, e-government and the digital divide: An exploratory study of UK local authority websites and older citizens. Interact. Comput. 2013, 25, 417–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Williams, D.; Alam, M.A.U.; Ahamed, S.I.; Chu, W. Considerations in Designing Human-Computer Interfaces for Elderly People. In Proceedings of the 2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software, Nanjing, China, 29–30 July 2013; pp. 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hodes, R.J.; Lindberg, D.A. Making your website senior friendly. Natl. Inst. Aging Natl. Libr. Med. 2002. Available online: https://seniorsocialisolation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Making-Your-Website-Senior-Friendly-Tip-Sheet.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Wagner, N.; Hassanein, K.; Head, M. Computer use by older adults: A multi-disciplinary review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 870–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patsoule, E.; Koutsabasis, P. Redesigning websites for older adults: A case study. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2014, 33, 561–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodrigues, S.S.; Scuracchio, P.E.; de Mattos Fortes, R.P. A Support to Evaluate Web Accessibility and Usability Issues for Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion, Thessaloniki, Greece, 20–22 June 2018; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rusdi, R.; Sahari, N.; Noor, S.F.M. Usability guidelines for elderly website interface. Asia-Pac. J. Inf. Technol. Multimed. 2017, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista, D. Adult Internet Usage Penetration in the United States from 2000 to 2018, by Age Group. 2018. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/184389/adult-internet-users-in-the-us-by-age-since-2000/ (accessed on 12 December 2012).
- Brazilian Internet Steering Committe—CGI.br. Brazilian Internet Steering Committee, Survey on the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in Brazilian Households: ICT Households 2020: COVID-19 Edition: Adapted Methodology; Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR, Ed.; CGI.br.: São Paulo, Brazil, 2021; Available online: https://www.cgi.br/publicacao/pesquisa-sobre-o-uso-das-tecnologias-de-informacao-e-comunicacao-nos-domicilios-brasileiros-tic-domicilios-2021/ (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Fisk, A.D.; Czaja, S.J.; Rogers, W.A.; Charness, N.; Sharit, J. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Czaja, S.J.; Lee, C.C. The impact of aging on access to technology. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2006, 5, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, R.; Betts, L.R.; Gardner, S.E. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2015, 48, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peral, B.P.; Gaitán, J.A.; Ramón-Jerónimo, M.Á. Technology Acceptance Model y mayores: La educación y la actividad laboral desarrollada son variables moderadoras? Rev. Espa NOla Investig. Mark. ESIC 2014, 18, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pan, S.; Jordan-Marsh, M. Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010, 26, 1111–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nimrod, G. Technophobia among older Internet users. Educ. Gerontol. 2018, 44, 148–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heart, T.; Kalderon, E. Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT? Int. J. Med. Inform. 2013, 82, e209–e231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selwyn, N. The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults’ use of information and communications technology. J. Aging Stud. 2004, 18, 369–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niehaves, B.; Plattfaut, R. Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2014, 23, 708–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gell, N.M.; Rosenberg, D.E.; Demiris, G.; LaCroix, A.Z.; Patel, K.V. Patterns of Technology Use among Older Adults with and without Disabilities. Gerontologist 2013, 55, 412–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Olson, K.E.; O’Brien, M.A.; Rogers, W.A.; Charness, N. Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults. Ageing Int. 2010, 36, 123–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barnard, Y.; Bradley, M.D.; Hodgson, F.; Lloyd, A.D. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2013, 29, 1715–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morris, J.M. User interface design for older adults. Interact. Comput. 1994, 6, 373–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction; Pearson Education India: Delhi, India; NCR: Noida, India, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Belloc, F.; Nicita, A.; Rossi, M.A. Whither policy design for broadband penetration? Evidence from 30 OECD countries. Telecommun. Policy 2012, 36, 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Z.; Miao, C.; Yu, H.; Leung, C.; Chin, J.J. The Effects of Familiarity Design on the Adoption of Wellness Games by the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), Singapore, 6–9 December 2015; Volume 2, pp. 387–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Oliveira, C.D.; Fioravanti, M.L.; de Mattos Fortes, R.P.; Barbosa, E.F. Accessibility in mobile applications for elderly users: A systematic mapping. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), San Jose, CA, USA, 3–6 October 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisk, A.D.; Czaja, S.J.; Rogers, W.A.; Charness, N.; Sharit, J. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd ed.; Human Factors & Aging Series; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lara, S.M.A.; de Mattos Fortes, R.P.; Russo, C.M.; Freire, A.P. A study on the acceptance of website interaction aids by older adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2016, 15, 445–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacio, R.R.; Acosta, C.O.; Cortez, J.; Morán, A.L. Usability perception of different video game devices in elderly users. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2017, 16, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emmanouilidou, M.; Kreps, D. A framework for accessible m-government implementation. Electron. Gov. Int. J. (EG) 2010, 7, 252–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Michel, G.; Brangier, E.; Brun, M. Ergonomic Principles to Improve the Use of Cognitive Stimulation Systems for the Elderly: A Comparative Study of Two Software Tools. In Proceedings of the Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Aging and Assistive Environments, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22–27 June 2014; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kascak, L.R.; Lee, S.; Liu, E.Y.; Sanford, J.A. Universal Design (UD) Guidelines for Interactive Mobile Voting Interfaces for Older Adults. In Proceedings of the Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to the Human Environment and Culture, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2–7 August 2015; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO/IEC 9126; Software Engineering–Product Quality. ISO/IEC, 2001. Available online: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/11245 (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Díaz-Bossini, J.M.; Moreno, L. Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 27, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tsai, H.y.; Shillair, R.; Cotten, S.; Winstead, V.; Yost, E. Getting Grandma Online: Are Tablets the Answer for Increasing Digital Inclusion for Older Adults in the U.S.? Educ. Gerontol. 2015, 41, 150513092755009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nielsen, J. Usability inspection methods. In Proceedings of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, 24–28 April 1994; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 413–414. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Razgan, M.S.; Al-Khalifa, H.S.; Al-Shahrani, M.D.; AlAjmi, H.H. Touch-Based Mobile Phone Interface Guidelines and Design Recommendations for Elderly People: A Survey of the Literature. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing, Doha, Qatar, 12–15 November 2012; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 568–574. [Google Scholar]
- Abascal, J.; Civit, A. Mobile communication for older people: New opportunities for autonomous life. EC/NSF Workshop Univers. Access. Ubiquitous Comput. Provid. Elder. 2001, 487, AJ-1–AJ-10. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.L.; Welser, H.T.; Cisneros, C.; Manatong, G.; Idris, I.K. Digital inequality in the Appalachian Ohio: Understanding how demographics, internet access, and skills can shape vital information use (VIU). Telemat. Inform. 2020, 50, 101380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanger, F.; Carter, L. The Effects of the Digital Divide on E-Government: An Empirical Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’06), Kauia, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2006; p. 81c. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foteinou, G. E-government adoption in the EU: Theoretical and methodological challenges in the study of the digital divide. In Values and Freedoms in Modern Information Law and Ethics; Nomiki Bibliothiki Group: Athens, Greece, 2011; pp. 227–245. [Google Scholar]
- Dwivedi, Y.K.; Weerakkody, V.; Janssen, M. Moving Towards Maturity: Challenges to Successful e-Government Implementation and iffusion. SIGMIS Database 2012, 42, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helbig, N.; Gil-García, J.R.; Ferro, E. Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature. Gov. Inf. Q. 2009, 26, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mossberger, K.; Tolbert, C.J.; Stansbury, M. Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide; Georgetown University Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- EMAG-Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo Eletrônico. EMAG-Modelo de Acessibilidade em Governo Eletrônico. 2014. Available online: http://emag.governoeletronico.gov.br (accessed on 22 May 2022).
- Molnar, T. Improving Usability of e-Government for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Government (ECEG), Portsmouth, UK, 18–19 June 2015; Volume 13. [Google Scholar]
- Abad, L.; Barroso, C.; Sánchez-Valle, M.; Abad, M.; Pretel, M. Electronic government and online tasks: Towards the autonomy and empowerment of senior citizens. El Prof. Inf. 2017, 26, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morrison, R.; Matuszek, T.; Self, D. Preparing a replication or update study in the business disciplines. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 2010, 47, 278–287. [Google Scholar]
- Kelley, K.; Clark, B.; Brown, V.; Sitzia, J. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2003, 15, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hill, R.; Beynon-Davies, P.; Williams, M.D. Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Inf. Technol. People 2008, 21, 244–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodd, C.; Athauda, R.; Adam, M. Designing user interfaces for the elderly: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand, 3–5 July 2017; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Flowers-Henderson, R. Access and Use of E-Government Public Services amongst Older Adults. Ph.D. Thesis, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, A.; Molnar, T.; Matyus, B. A User-centred Design Approach for Mobile- Government Systems for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 2018 12th International Conference on Software, Knowledge, Information Management & Applications (SKIMA), Phnom Penh, Camboja, 3–5 December 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yap, C.S.; Ahmad, R.; Newaz, F.T.; Mason, C. Continuous use intention of E-government portals the perspective of older citizens. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. (IJEGR) 2019, 15, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Age Band (Years) | % | Frequency | Education | % | Frequency | Employment | % | Frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50–59 | 53.8% | 77 | Incomplete Elementary School | 36.4% | 52 | Employed | 30.1% | 43 |
60–69 | 24.5% | 35 | Elementary School | 9.1% | 13 | Unemployed | 7% | 10 |
70 and above | 21.7% | 31 | High School | 21% | 30 | Self-employed | 13.3% | 19 |
University degree | 11.2% | 16 | Retired | 49.7% | 71 | |||
Postgraduate degree | 18.9% | 27 | ||||||
Illiterate | 3.5% | 5 | ||||||
Total | 143 |
Answer Options | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neutral | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Useful | 87 (60.8%) | 57 (39.9%) | 15 (14.5%) | 1 (1%) | 3 (2.1%) |
Relevant | 40 (28%) | 72 (50.3%) | 20 (14%) | 8 (5.6%) | 3 (2.1%) |
Convenient | 33 (23.1%) | 70 (49%) | 33 (23.1%) | 5 (3.5%) | 2 (1.4%) |
Secure | 3 (2.1%) | 21 (14.7%) | 47 (33%) | 57 (40%) | 15 (10.5%) |
Informative | 49 (34.2%) | 70 (49%) | 16 (11.2%) | 5 (3.5%) | 3 (2.1%) |
Empowering | 28 (19.6%) | 71 (49.7%) | 31 (21.7%) | 9 (6.3%) | 4 (2.8%) |
Reliable | 4 (2.8%) | 26 (18.2%) | 36 (25.2%) | 58 (41%) | 19 (13.3%) |
Affordable | 18 (12.6%) | 65 (45.5%) | 34 (23.8%) | 24 (16.8%) | 2 (1.4%) |
Fast | 18 (12.6%) | 65 (45.5%) | 36 (25.2%) | 20 (14%) | 4 (2.8%) |
Trendy | 42 (29.4%) | 60 (42%) | 24 (16.8%) | 13 (9.1%) | 4 (2.8%) |
Easy to Use | 18 (12.6%) | 39 (27.3%) | 46 (32.2%) | 34 (23.8%) | 6 (4.2%) |
Adaptable to Lifestyles | 19 (13.3%) | 66 (46.2%) | 37 (26%) | 19 (13.3%) | 2 (1.4%) |
Items | Total |
---|---|
I am not computer literate. | 36 |
I would rather speak to a person. | 28 |
It is too complex to use. | 20 |
It is not suitable for my lifestyle. | 15 |
It is not safe to pay or issue bills on the Internet. | 10 |
It is too time-consuming. | 6 |
Too difficult to find information. | 5 |
Content Items | Very Poor | Poor | Average | Good | Excellent | NA |
The website provides information that exactly fit into my needs. | 4 | 11 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 10 |
The website provides up-to-date information. | 3 | 12 | 28 | 27 | 1 | 12 |
The website provides the answers to most of my inquiry. | 5 | 16 | 32 | 18 | 1 | 11 |
The website provides complete information. | 4 | 16 | 34 | 18 | 1 | 10 |
The website uses words that are consistent and easy to understand. | 4 | 16 | 34 | 18 | 1 | 10 |
Quality Items | Very Poor | Poor | Average | Good | Excellent | NOA |
The website is simple to use, even when using it for the first time. | 3 | 15 | 33 | 15 | 5 | 12 |
It is easy to find the information I need from the website. | 2 | 15 | 37 | 13 | 5 | 11 |
I like the way the website is designed. | 3 | 18 | 30 | 17 | 3 | 12 |
The website uses colors with contrast and good for the eyes. | 2 | 11 | 32 | 21 | 7 | 10 |
It is very easy to move around the website. | 3 | 17 | 30 | 17 | 6 | 10 |
The content of the website is well laid out. | 2 | 19 | 26 | 19 | 5 | 12 |
The website can be easily used by people with disabilities. | 19 | 17 | 20 | 10 | 2 | 15 |
The website has helpful guides and instructions. | 4 | 16 | 29 | 21 | 3 | 10 |
The pages of the website including archives are downloaded quickly. | 4 | 16 | 27 | 18 | 6 | 12 |
Services | % |
---|---|
Treatment and supply of water/sewage, production and distribution of electricity, gas, and fuels | 68.5% |
Medical and hospital care | 63.6% |
Bank services | 51% |
Courts, legal and emergency services (e.g., notary offices, fire department, police, civil defense, etc.) | 41.3% |
Education (e.g., public schools, public universities, etc.) | 31.5% |
Distribution and selling of medicines and foods | 32.9% |
Public transport (e.g., buses, subways and others) | 16.1% |
Social services (e.g., public housing, social assistance, food allowances, etc.) | 14% |
Environment and environmental protection | 13.3% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
da Silva, L.F.; Zitkus, E.; Freire, A.P. An Exploratory Study of the Use of the Internet and E-Government by Older Adults in the Countryside of Brazil. Information 2023, 14, 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040225
da Silva LF, Zitkus E, Freire AP. An Exploratory Study of the Use of the Internet and E-Government by Older Adults in the Countryside of Brazil. Information. 2023; 14(4):225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040225
Chicago/Turabian Styleda Silva, Leonardo Filipe, Emilene Zitkus, and André Pimenta Freire. 2023. "An Exploratory Study of the Use of the Internet and E-Government by Older Adults in the Countryside of Brazil" Information 14, no. 4: 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040225
APA Styleda Silva, L. F., Zitkus, E., & Freire, A. P. (2023). An Exploratory Study of the Use of the Internet and E-Government by Older Adults in the Countryside of Brazil. Information, 14(4), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14040225