Next Article in Journal
Gods, Gurus, Prophets and the Poor: Exploring Informal, Interfaith Exchanges among Working Class Female Workers in an Indian City
Previous Article in Journal
Being Christian through External Giving
Previous Article in Special Issue
Medical Aesthetics in the Twilight of Empire: Lungrik Tendar and The Stainless Vaiḍūrya Mirror
Open AccessArticle

Arguing over the Buddhist Pedigree of Tibetan Medicine: A Case Study of Empirical Observation and Traditional Learning in 16th- and 17th-Century Tibet

Department of Religious Studies, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA
Religions 2019, 10(9), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10090530
Received: 17 May 2019 / Revised: 6 September 2019 / Accepted: 8 September 2019 / Published: 16 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Buddhist Medicine in India, Tibet, and Mongolia)
This article examines the relationship between the practice and theory of medicine and Buddhism in premodern Tibet. It considers a polemical text composed by the 16th–17th-century Tibetan physician and tantric Buddhist expert Sokdokpa Lodrö Gyeltsen, intending to prove the Buddhist canonical status of the Four Medical Tantras, the foundational text of the Tibetan medical tradition. While presenting and analyzing Sokdokpa’s polemical writing in the context of the broader debate over the Buddhist pedigree of the Four Tantras that took place during his time, this discussion situates Sokdokpa’s reflections on the topic in terms of his broader career as both a practicing physician and a tantric Buddhist ritual and contemplative specialist. It suggests that by virtue of Sokdokpa’s tightly interwoven activities in the spheres of medicine and Buddhism, his contribution to this debate gives voice to a sensibility in which empiricist, historicist, and Buddhist ritual and contemplative inflections intermingle in ways that resist easy disentanglement and classification. In this it argues that Sokdokpa’s reflections form an important counterpoint to the perspectives considered thus far in the scholarly study of this debate. It also questions if Sokdokpa’s style of argumentation might call for a recalibration of how scholars currently construe the roles of tantric Buddhist practice in the appeal by premodern Tibetan physicians to critical and probative criteria. View Full-Text
Keywords: Buddhism and medicine; premodern Tibet; tantra; Four Medical Tantras; polemics; apologia; Sokdokpa; rgyud bzhi bka’ sgrub Buddhism and medicine; premodern Tibet; tantra; Four Medical Tantras; polemics; apologia; Sokdokpa; rgyud bzhi bka’ sgrub
MDPI and ACS Style

Gentry, J.D. Arguing over the Buddhist Pedigree of Tibetan Medicine: A Case Study of Empirical Observation and Traditional Learning in 16th- and 17th-Century Tibet. Religions 2019, 10, 530.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop