Next Article in Journal
Pediatric Maxillofacial Fractures: Patterns of Injury, Surgical Indications, and Treatment Outcomes: A Five-Year Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in the Management of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: A Clinical Update
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of the Influence of Er:YAG Laser Parameters on the Effectiveness of Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms: An In Vitro Study

by
Diana Dembicka-Mączka
1,*,
Jakub Fiegler-Rudol
2,
Małgorzata Kępa
3,
Dariusz Skaba
2,* and
Rafał Wiench
2
1
Dental Office, Artistic Smile Studio, 61/1 Krakowska Street, 33-100 Tarnów, Poland
2
Department of Periodontal and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland
3
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences in Sosnowiec, Medical University of Silesia, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(1), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010018
Submission received: 3 December 2025 / Revised: 15 December 2025 / Accepted: 18 December 2025 / Published: 19 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Candida biofilms exhibit high resistance to antifungal treatment, motivating investigation of adjunctive physical disinfection methods. To quantitatively assess the effect of Er:YAG laser fluence on growth inhibition and viability of single-species Candida biofilms in vitro using a 7 mm full-beam handpiece. Methods: Biofilms of Candida albicans ATCC 10231, C. glabrata ATCC 90030, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and C. krusei ATCC 6258 were grown on Sabouraud agar. In phase 1, growth inhibition zones (GIZs) were evaluated after non-contact Er:YAG irradiation (2 Hz, 300 µs, 10 mm distance, no air or water spray) at fluences from 0.3 to 3.4 J/cm2, with incubation for 24 to 96 h. In phase 2, 96 h mature biofilms were irradiated for 120 s at 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 J/cm2, and viability was quantified by colony-forming unit (CFU) imprinting. All experimental conditions were tested in quadruplicate. Results: GIZ diameters increased significantly with fluence for all species (p < 0.05) and remained stable up to 96 h. At the highest fluence, mean GIZs reached approximately 8.0 mm for C. albicans, 7.7 mm for C. parapsilosis, 7.0 mm for C. krusei, and 5.2 mm for C. glaxfbrata. In mature biofilms, CFU counts decreased significantly with increasing fluence (p < 0.05). For C. albicans, CFUs were reduced from 164.0 ± 25.1 at 0.8 J/cm2 to 16.5 ± 5.2 at 2.0 J/cm2, while C. glabrata decreased from 103.5 ± 5.4 to 20.8 ± 1.7. C. parapsilosis and C. krusei showed maximal reductions at 1.0–1.5 J/cm2, followed by partial CFU rebound at 2.0 J/cm2. Conclusions: Er:YAG irradiation delivered over a large, uniformly illuminated area induces stable, fluence-dependent inhibition and significant reduction of Candida biofilm viability in vitro. Optimal fluence ranges are species specific, underscoring the need for parameter optimization and further evaluation in more complex biofilm models before clinical extrapolation.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Fungal infections caused by yeasts of the genus Candida represent a significant clinical problem, particularly in immunocompromised patients, individuals with diabetes, those receiving prolonged antibiotic therapy, and denture wearers [1,2,3]. Candida albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei are among the species most frequently associated with oral candidiasis and denture-related stomatitis [1,2]. A major virulence factor of these organisms is their ability to form biofilms, structured microbial communities embedded in an extracellular matrix composed of polysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNA [4]. Biofilm formation markedly increases tolerance to antifungal agents and environmental stress. Candida cells within biofilms have been shown to be up to several hundred-fold more resistant to commonly used antifungals, such as fluconazole and amphotericin B, than their planktonic counterparts [3,4]. Consequently, conventional pharmacological therapy often achieves only partial reduction of fungal burden rather than complete eradication, contributing to persistence and recurrence of infection [2,5]. These limitations have driven interest in adjunctive physical disinfection approaches that may reduce biofilm-associated microorganisms without relying exclusively on antifungal drugs.

1.2. Er:YAG Laser and Antimicrobial Applications

The Er:YAG (erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet) laser emits radiation at a wavelength of 2940 nm, which is strongly absorbed by water and hydroxyapatite [6,7]. This characteristic underlies its widespread clinical use in dentistry and has also prompted investigation of its antimicrobial potential. Absorption of laser energy by water-rich microbial cells and biofilm matrices can induce rapid heating, micro-expansive effects, and structural disruption, resulting in decreased microbial viability [7,8,9,10]. Several in vitro studies have demonstrated that Er:YAG irradiation can reduce bacterial and fungal biofilms on dental hard tissues, implant surfaces, and restorative materials [11,12,13,14,15]. However, most available data focus on bacterial species, while evidence concerning Candida biofilms remains comparatively limited. Studies addressing Candida have often used narrow fiber tips, relatively high fluence values, or short exposure times, and have primarily examined early biofilm stages rather than mature biofilms [10,11,12,13]. Importantly, reported outcomes generally indicate partial reductions in viable counts rather than complete elimination, suggesting that Er:YAG irradiation acts as a disinfection modality rather than achieving sterilization [10,15,16].

1.3. Rationale and Aim of the Study

Despite increasing interest in laser-based disinfection, there is a lack of systematic data on the response of different Candida species, particularly mature biofilms, to Er:YAG irradiation delivered at low fluence over a large, homogeneously illuminated area. Studies specifically investigating the influence of beam diameter and uniform energy distribution on antifungal effectiveness are scarce [10,16,17]. As a result, optimal parameter ranges for reproducible and species-specific biofilm reduction remain insufficiently defined. The aim of this in vitro study was therefore to evaluate the influence of selected Er:YAG laser parameters on growth inhibition and viability reduction of single-species Candida biofilms. Particular emphasis was placed on low fluence irradiation delivered with a 7 mm full-beam handpiece and on comparing responses among clinically relevant Candida species. The working hypothesis was that Er:YAG irradiation under these conditions would produce a significant, fluence-dependent reduction in biofilm growth and viability compared with non-irradiated controls. The null hypothesis was that laser exposure would not result in statistically significant differences in growth inhibition zones or colony-forming unit counts. While Candida-associated biofilm infections represent an important clinical challenge, the present investigation is designed as a preliminary in vitro study. Its purpose is to generate controlled experimental data on fluence-dependent Er:YAG laser effects that may inform the design of future in vivo and clinical studies, rather than to establish immediate clinical applicability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This in vitro study was designed to evaluate the fluence-dependent effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on single-species Candida biofilms using two complementary experimental endpoints. The study consisted of two sequential experimental phases addressing distinct, but related, outcome measures. Phase 1 (growth inhibition phase) assessed the ability of Er:YAG irradiation to inhibit radial expansion of Candida biofilms formed on solid agar. The outcome of this phase was the diameter of the growth inhibition zone (GIZ), measured after laser exposure and subsequent incubation. This phase was intended to characterize fluence-dependent suppression of biofilm growth over time. Phase 2 (biofilm viability reduction phase) evaluated the effect of Er:YAG irradiation on established, mature Candida biofilms. The outcome of this phase was the number of viable microorganisms remaining after irradiation, quantified as colony-forming units (CFUs) obtained by contact imprinting. This phase focused on assessing laser-induced disinfection rather than eradication.
The primary outcome variables were:
  • Diameter of the growth inhibition zone (GIZ) in Phase 1
  • CFU counts following irradiation of mature biofilms in Phase 2
The secondary outcomes included:
  • Persistence of inhibition zones over a 96 h incubation period
  • Species-specific differences in fluence–response relationships
The independent variable in both phases was laser fluence, delivered at a fixed pulse frequency of 2 Hz and pulse duration of 300 µs. The dependent variables were GIZ diameter and CFU count, respectively. Each experimental condition, defined by Candida species and laser setting, was tested in four independent replicates (n = 4). The sample size was selected based on consistency with prior in vitro laser disinfection studies and preliminary experiments indicating low within-group variability. A formal a priori power calculation was not performed; however, the chosen replication level was sufficient to detect statistically significant differences between fluence levels using one-way analysis of variance at a significance level of p < 0.05.

2.2. Microorganisms

The study included reference strains obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC): Candida albicans ATCC 10231, C. glabrata ATCC 90030, C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019, and C. krusei ATCC 6258. These species were selected due to their established relevance in oral candidiasis and denture-related infections [1,2]. All strains originated from the culture collection of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia (Sosnowiec, Poland), and were stored at −80 °C in tryptic soy broth supplemented with glycerol until use. Only reference strains were used in this study; no clinical isolates were included. While this approach allows standardized inter-species comparisons and reproducibility, it represents a limitation with respect to external validity and strain-level heterogeneity, which is addressed further in Section 4.

2.3. Growth Conditions

Prior to experimentation, frozen stocks were thawed and subcultured twice on Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with chloramphenicol to ensure viability and purity. Each subculture was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After the second subculture, a fresh overnight culture was used to prepare cell suspensions. Colonies were suspended in sterile 0.9 percent NaCl solution and adjusted to a density of 0.5 McFarland standard, corresponding to approximately 1 × 106 cells/mL, as measured at 525 nm using a DensiLa-Meter II device (Brno, Czech). The standardized suspensions were used for inoculation within 15 min of preparation to minimize variability related to cell settling or growth phase changes. For biofilm formation, standardized suspensions were evenly inoculated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates and incubated at 37 °C under aerobic conditions. Biofilms intended for the growth inhibition phase were irradiated immediately after inoculation, whereas biofilms intended for the mature biofilm phase were incubated for 96 h prior to laser exposure.

2.4. Experimental Groups

For each Candida species, Petri dishes containing Sabouraud dextrose agar were assigned to one of the following groups:
  • Control group: Biofilms not exposed to laser irradiation
  • Experimental groups: Biofilms exposed to Er:YAG laser irradiation at defined fluence settings
Each experimental condition, defined by Candida species and laser setting, was performed in four independent replicates (n = 4). The same number of replicates (n = 4) was used for the corresponding control group for each species and incubation time point.

2.5. Evaluation of the Er:YAG Laser Effect on Growth Inhibition of Single-Species Candida Biofilms

Laser irradiation was performed using an Er:YAG laser system (Fotona LightWalker AT-S, Fotona, Slovenia) operating in pulsed mode at a fixed frequency of 2 Hz and pulse duration of 300 µs. The R16 handpiece was used in full-beam mode, providing a nominal circular spot diameter of 7 mm. Irradiation was performed in non-contact mode without air or water spray. The laser handpiece was mounted on a fixed stand and positioned perpendicular to the agar surface at a distance of 10 mm. A positioning template with 26 predefined irradiation points arranged in two concentric circles was placed beneath each Petri dish to standardize exposure locations. Following irradiation, plates were incubated at 37 °C and evaluated after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Growth inhibition zones (GIZs) were documented photographically and measured after 24, 48, 72, and 96 h using ImageJ-Fiji software (version 1.53j), calibrated against a metric reference. The laser settings, defined by fluence and corresponding average power at 2 Hz (pulse duration 300 µs), were as follows: fluence values of 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.4 J/cm2, corresponding to average power outputs of 0.20, 0.30, 0.35, 0.45, 0.50, 0.60, 0.65, 0.75, 1.15, 1.50, 1.90, 2.30, and 2.60 W, respectively. Given a nominal beam diameter of 7 mm, the irradiated surface area was calculated as A = πr2, resulting in an area of 0.3848 cm2. Derived laser parameters, including power density, pulse energy, and total delivered energy, are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Fluence values were calculated based on the manufacturer-provided laser output parameters and nominal beam diameter. Independent verification of fluence at the sample surface using a power meter was not performed, and beam homogeneity was assumed based on the handpiece design specifications. Given a 7 mm beam diameter, the irradiated area was calculated as:
A = πr2 = π·(0.35 cm)2 = 0.384845 cm2.
The results of this are presented in Table 1. Laser parameters are noted in Table 2.
The Er:YAG laser system was operated in dual-pulse mode (manufacturer-defined MSP mode), delivering a sequence of two sub-pulses within each pulse envelope, as implemented in the Fotona LightWalker AT-S platform (Fotona d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia). Irradiation was performed at a fixed repetition rate of 2 Hz. Consequently, during the 120 s exposure applied in the mature biofilm phase, each irradiated area received a total of 240 laser pulses. The R16 handpiece was used in full-beam mode, producing a nominal circular spot diameter of 7 mm. Independent experimental measurements of beam uniformity or spatial energy distribution were not performed. Beam homogeneity was therefore assumed based on the manufacturer’s optical design specifications for the full-beam handpiece, which are intended to provide a relatively uniform energy distribution across the irradiated area.

2.6. Evaluation of the Er:YAG Laser Effect on Elimination of Mature Single-Species Candida Biofilms

For the assessment of mature biofilm viability, Candida biofilms were allowed to develop for 96 h on Sabouraud dextrose agar at 37 °C. After incubation, plates were subjected to Er:YAG laser irradiation using the same system and general setup described above (2 Hz, 300 µs, non-contact mode, 10 mm distance, no air or water spray).
A custom template dividing the agar surface into four discrete, non-overlapping squares (12 × 12 mm each) was used to define irradiation areas. Each square was irradiated independently using one of the following fluence and power settings:
  • Upper left: 0.8 J/cm2 (0.60 W)
  • Upper right: 1.0 J/cm2 (0.75 W)
  • Lower left: 1.5 J/cm2 (1.15 W)
  • Lower right: 2.0 J/cm2 (1.50 W)
Each square was exposed for a fixed duration of 120 s. The distance between adjacent squares exceeded the nominal beam diameter, and the laser handpiece was repositioned between exposures to avoid overlap or unintended irradiation of neighboring areas. The template remained in place throughout the procedure to ensure consistent positioning and to minimize edge effects. No additional shielding was applied, but care was taken to prevent direct or reflected laser exposure outside the defined irradiation zones. Immediately after laser exposure, Rodac contact plates (IRR LAB-Agar, Sabouraud dextrose agar with chloramphenicol, 55 mm diameter) were applied to each treated area with gentle, standardized pressure for 10 s to obtain microbial imprints. The contact plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After incubation, colonies were documented photographically under the same conditions used for the growth inhibition assessment, and viable counts were expressed as colony-forming units (CFUs) per imprint. The selection of fluence values for this phase was based on the growth inhibition results described in Section 3.1, which indicated measurable and stable inhibition at low to moderate fluence ranges. An exposure time of 120 s per square was chosen to standardize total energy delivery across all samples and to enhance detection of fluence-dependent differences in mature biofilm viability.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed retrospectively, and all results are reported in the past tense. Normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene’s test. For each Candida species, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effect of laser fluence on the diameter of growth inhibition zones (Phase 1) and on colony-forming unit (CFU) counts in mature biofilms (Phase 2). When ANOVA indicated a statistically significant overall effect (p < 0.05), post hoc multiple comparisons were performed. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was applied when assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were met. The Newman–Keuls test was used in cases where variance homogeneity was marginal but ANOVA assumptions were not violated sufficiently to preclude parametric testing. Outliers were evaluated using inspection of standardized residuals and boxplot analysis. Observations exceeding ±3 standard deviations from the group mean were flagged as potential outliers. No data points were excluded, as all values were traceable to valid experimental replicates and no technical or procedural errors were identified during data acquisition. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms (Phase 1)

Quantitative assessment of growth inhibition was performed by measuring growth inhibition zone (GIZ) diameters at 24 h after Er:YAG irradiation. Mean GIZ values and standard deviations for all fluence levels and Candida species are summarized in Table 3. Subsequent observations at 48, 72, and 96 h were qualitative and were used to assess persistence of inhibition rather than changes in zone diameter.
For all tested species, Er:YAG irradiation produced measurable growth inhibition at all fluence levels tested (0.3–3.4 J/cm2). One-way ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of fluence on GIZ diameter for each species (p < 0.05).

3.1.1. Candida albicans ATCC 10231

C. albicans showed a clear fluence-dependent increase in GIZ diameter. At low fluence (0.3–0.5 J/cm2), mean GIZs ranged from approximately 5.5 to 5.6 mm at 24 h. At intermediate fluence (0.6–1.0 J/cm2), inhibition zones increased to approximately 6.5–6.8 mm. At higher fluence levels (1.5–3.4 J/cm2), mean GIZs ranged from approximately 6.9 to 7.4 mm. No visible regrowth into inhibited areas was observed up to 96 h.

3.1.2. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019

C. parapsilosis exhibited pronounced growth inhibition with increasing fluence. Mean GIZ diameters increased from approximately 5.1 mm at 0.3 J/cm2 to approximately 7.7 mm at 3.4 J/cm2. The increase was most pronounced between 0.3 and 1.5 J/cm2, after which GIZ diameters showed a tendency toward plateauing. Inhibition zones remained clearly delineated throughout the 96 h observation period.

3.1.3. Candida krusei ATCC 6258

C. krusei demonstrated smaller inhibition zones at low fluence levels. Mean GIZs ranged from approximately 5.0 to 5.3 mm between 0.3 and 0.6 J/cm2. A gradual increase was observed at higher fluence, reaching approximately 7.0 mm at 3.0–3.4 J/cm2. Inhibition zones persisted without visible reduction over time.

3.1.4. Candida glabrata ATCC 90030

C. glabrata was the least responsive species in Phase 1. Mean GIZ diameters ranged from approximately 4.0 mm at 0.3 J/cm2 to approximately 5.2 mm at 3.4 J/cm2. Despite smaller inhibition zones, no regrowth was observed within inhibited areas during the 96 h observation period.

3.2. Reduction of Viable Cells in Mature Biofilms (Phase 2)

Quantitative analysis of mature biofilm viability was performed using CFU counts obtained by contact imprinting after irradiation of 96 h biofilms. Mean CFU values with standard deviations are presented in Table 3, and graphical representation is shown in Figure 1. For all Candida species, Er:YAG irradiation resulted in statistically significant reductions in CFU counts compared with the lowest fluence tested (0.8 J/cm2) (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05). The magnitude and pattern of reduction differed among species.

3.2.1. Candida albicans ATCC 10231

Mean CFU counts decreased from 164.0 ± 25.1 at 0.8 J/cm2 to 82.8 ± 6.7 at 1.0 J/cm2, 33.5 ± 7.5 at 1.5 J/cm2, and 16.5 ± 5.2 at 2.0 J/cm2. This corresponds to an approximate 90 percent reduction relative to the lowest fluence.

3.2.2. Candida glabrata ATCC 90030

For C. glabrata, CFU counts declined from 103.5 ± 5.4 at 0.8 J/cm2 to 51.5 ± 2.9 at 1.0 J/cm2, 27.8 ± 3.0 at 1.5 J/cm2, and 20.8 ± 1.7 at 2.0 J/cm2, representing an approximate 80 percent reduction.

3.2.3. Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019

C. parapsilosis showed a non-linear response. Mean CFU counts decreased from 86.0 ± 3.7 at 0.8 J/cm2 to 55.3 ± 2.2 at 1.0 J/cm2 and reached a minimum of 37.5 ± 2.1 at 1.5 J/cm2. At 2.0 J/cm2, CFU counts increased to 55.0 ± 2.2, indicating reduced efficacy at the highest fluence tested.

3.2.4. Candida krusei ATCC 6258

A similar pattern was observed for C. krusei. CFU counts decreased from 106.3 ± 5.1 at 0.8 J/cm2 to 62.0 ± 2.6 at 1.0 J/cm2 and 40.3 ± 1.7 at 1.5 J/cm2, followed by an increase to 47.5 ± 2.1 at 2.0 J/cm2.

3.3. Summary of Results

Across both experimental phases, Er:YAG laser irradiation produced fluence-dependent inhibition of growth and reduction of viable cells in single-species Candida biofilms. The magnitude of the effect was species dependent. C. albicans and C. glabrata showed the most consistent reductions in mature biofilm viability, while C. parapsilosis and C. krusei demonstrated maximal effects at intermediate fluence levels, with reduced efficacy at the highest fluence tested.

Summary of Mature Biofilm Response

Altogether, Er:YAG irradiation at 0.8–2.0 J/cm2 reduced the viability of mature Candida biofilms, with the strongest disinfection in C. albicans and C. glabrata. C. parapsilosis and C. krusei were more resistant at the highest fluence, which points to the need for species adjusted laser parameters. This is summarized in Table 4 and Figure 1.

4. Discussion

The present in vitro study examined the effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on the growth inhibition and viability reduction of single-species Candida biofilms using a large, homogeneously illuminated beam. The results demonstrate that Er:YAG irradiation can induce statistically significant, fluence-dependent reductions in biofilm growth and viable cell counts across multiple Candida species. However, given the modest sample size, simplified experimental model, and limited parameter space explored, these findings should be interpreted as evidence of controlled antifungal disinfection rather than definitive proof of eradication or clinical efficacy.

4.1. Interpretation of the Primary Findings

Both experimental phases showed a consistent association between increasing fluence and antifungal effect, as reflected by larger growth inhibition zones in early biofilms and lower CFU counts in mature biofilms. These outcomes indicate that Er:YAG irradiation interferes with Candida biofilm development and persistence under defined laboratory conditions. Nevertheless, the statistical analyses applied in this study primarily demonstrate differences between fluence levels and controls, without detailed exploration of effect size distributions or mechanistic correlates. Consequently, conclusions regarding biological relevance should remain proportionate to the scope of the data.
The persistence of growth inhibition over 96 h suggests that the initial laser exposure produced durable alterations in biofilm structure or viability. However, because inhibition zone diameters were quantitatively assessed only at 24 h, later time points served to confirm stability rather than to provide additional quantitative resolution. While this approach is common in in vitro biofilm studies, it limits temporal insight into dynamic regrowth processes [10,17].

4.2. Species-Specific Susceptibility Patterns

Clear interspecies differences were observed in both growth inhibition and mature biofilm viability reduction. Candida albicans and C. parapsilosis showed the greatest susceptibility to Er:YAG irradiation, whereas C. glabrata exhibited consistently lower responses, and C. krusei demonstrated an intermediate pattern. These findings align with prior reports indicating that Candida species differ substantially in biofilm architecture, extracellular matrix composition, and intrinsic stress tolerance [2,4,10,12]. Several biological factors may contribute to these differences. For example, C. glabrata is known to form denser, more compact biofilms with lower metabolic activity, which may reduce susceptibility to physical or thermal stress [2,4]. In contrast, C. parapsilosis often forms thinner biofilms with higher surface exposure, potentially facilitating energy absorption [10,17]. Differences in extracellular matrix hydration, polysaccharide composition, and expression of heat shock or stress response proteins may also influence laser responsiveness [4,15,18]. Importantly, these explanations remain hypothetical within the context of the present study, as no direct structural, biochemical, or molecular analyses were performed. The speculative nature of these interpretations should therefore be emphasized.
Most previously published in vitro studies investigating the antifungal effects of Er:YAG irradiation on Candida biofilms have employed narrow fiber tips or small spot diameters, typically resulting in highly localized energy delivery and steep energy gradients [10,11,12,13,19]. Under such conditions, antifungal effects are often limited to focal ablation or superficial disruption, and reported outcomes frequently depend on higher fluence values or short exposure times. In contrast, the present study specifically explored low-fluence irradiation delivered over a comparatively large, homogeneously illuminated area using a 7 mm full-beam handpiece. This approach minimizes focal overheating and emphasizes distributed photothermal and micro-expansive effects rather than localized ablation. The observed fluence-dependent inhibition and partial biofilm disinfection at relatively low energy densities therefore extend existing literature by demonstrating that broad-beam Er:YAG irradiation can achieve measurable antifungal effects under conditions that differ substantially from conventional narrow-fiber protocols.

4.3. Effects on Mature Biofilms and Dose–Response Considerations

Mature 96 h biofilms represent a more resistant and clinically relevant phenotype than early biofilms, due to increased matrix complexity, reduced metabolic activity, and the presence of persister cells [3,4]. In this context, the observed reductions in CFU counts following Er:YAG irradiation indicate that laser energy can penetrate at least superficial biofilm layers and reduce viability. However, the absence of complete eradication across all tested conditions highlights the inherent limitations of single-modality physical disinfection in mature biofilms. The non-linear responses observed for C. parapsilosis and C. krusei, with partial CFU rebound at the highest fluence tested, underscore the complexity of dose–response relationships in biofilm systems. Increasing fluence does not necessarily translate into proportionally greater antimicrobial effects. Possible contributing factors include localized vapor formation that limits deeper energy penetration, heterogeneous biofilm density, or stress-induced survival mechanisms activated at higher energy exposures [17,18,19]. Without direct measurement of temperature gradients, matrix disruption, or cell viability distribution within the biofilm, these explanations remain tentative.
Absorption of Er:YAG laser radiation at 2940 nm is strongly dependent on water content, which is a critical determinant of energy deposition within microbial biofilms. In the present agar-based model, biofilm hydration is influenced by both the intrinsic water content of the extracellular matrix and the moisture retained within the agar substrate. Variations in surface hydration or partial drying of the biofilm during incubation may therefore alter local absorption characteristics and energy transfer. Increased hydration may enhance laser absorption and promote micro-expansive effects within the biofilm matrix, whereas partial dehydration could reduce effective energy coupling and limit antifungal efficacy. Because hydration state was not actively controlled or quantified in this study, its contribution to the observed species- and fluence-dependent effects cannot be excluded and should be considered when interpreting the results. Future studies incorporating controlled hydration conditions or real-time moisture monitoring may help clarify the role of water content in Er:YAG-mediated biofilm disruption.

4.4. Disinfection Versus Eradication

A critical conceptual distinction highlighted by the present findings is that between disinfection and eradication. Although statistically significant reductions in CFU counts were achieved, no laser parameter resulted in complete elimination of Candida biofilms. This outcome is consistent with previous Er:YAG and laser-based disinfection studies, which generally report partial reductions rather than sterilization, particularly in structured biofilms [10,15,16,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Recognizing this distinction is important to avoid unrealistic expectations regarding laser-based antifungal strategies. In the context of biofilm-associated infections, reduction of microbial burden may still be clinically meaningful, particularly when combined with mechanical cleaning or pharmacological agents. However, the present study does not provide evidence to support Er:YAG irradiation as a standalone eradication method.

4.5. Translational Implications and Caution

While the antifungal effects observed in this study suggest potential relevance for oral surfaces colonized by Candida, the experimental model remains far removed from clinical reality. The study did not assess temperature rise, cytotoxicity to host cells, or effects on dental materials or mucosal tissues. Consequently, extrapolation to clinical protocols for denture stomatitis, peri-implantitis, or mucosal candidiasis should be approached with caution.
Previous studies have suggested that Er:YAG irradiation may be safely applied to oral tissues at low fluence levels [6,9,15], and that combination approaches with antiseptics or irrigants may enhance antimicrobial outcomes [17,18,19]. However, such considerations remain speculative in the absence of direct safety and efficacy data from the present work.
Although the present study employed single-species Candida biofilms, the oral cavity is characterized by complex polymicrobial communities that include streptococci, anaerobes, Staphylococcus aureus, and other bacterial taxa that interact structurally and metabolically with Candida spp. [29]. Such interactions can influence biofilm architecture, matrix composition, and susceptibility to physical disruption. The partial reductions observed in the current single-species model may therefore underestimate or overestimate effects occurring in polymicrobial biofilms, where cooperative or competitive interactions could modify laser responsiveness. Acknowledging this complexity further underscores the need for future studies using multispecies biofilm models that more closely approximate clinical conditions.

4.6. Limitations

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, only reference ATCC strains were used, and no clinical isolates were included. While this enhances standardization and reproducibility, it limits insight into strain-level variability encountered in clinical infections. Second, the use of single-species biofilms grown on agar does not replicate the multispecies composition, salivary conditioning, or mechanical forces present in the oral cavity [1,2]. Third, the laser parameter space was restricted to a single pulse frequency (2 Hz) and pulse duration (300 µs), and the number of replicates per condition was modest (n = 4). Fourth, laser output parameters were based on manufacturer specifications, without independent verification of fluence at the sample surface or quantitative assessment of beam homogeneity. Finally, no cytotoxicity, thermal, or material compatibility assessments were performed, precluding conclusions about clinical safety.

4.7. Future Directions

Future investigations should expand upon these findings by incorporating clinical Candida isolates, multispecies biofilm models, and substrates that better reflect oral materials, such as acrylic resin or titanium. Detailed thermal monitoring and host cell viability assays will be essential to define safe operating windows. Repeated or cumulative irradiation protocols, as well as combination strategies with antifungal agents or antiseptics, may help overcome the partial reductions observed in mature biofilms. Ultimately, controlled in vivo studies will be required to determine whether the in vitro disinfection effects demonstrated here translate into meaningful clinical benefits.

5. Conclusions

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Er:YAG laser irradiation delivered in non-contact mode with a 7 mm full-beam handpiece produced fluence-dependent inhibition of growth and measurable reductions in the viability of single-species Candida biofilms grown on agar. Stable growth inhibition zones and significant decreases in colony-forming unit counts were observed for all tested species, with the magnitude of the effect varying among C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. krusei. The results indicate that low to moderate fluence Er:YAG irradiation can achieve partial disinfection of both early and mature Candida biofilms under controlled laboratory conditions. Species-specific differences in response were observed, and for C. parapsilosis and C. krusei the data suggest that increasing fluence beyond certain levels did not further enhance biofilm reduction; however, this observation is based on a limited number of fluence settings and should be interpreted cautiously. Overall, the findings support the conclusion that Er:YAG irradiation can reduce fungal biofilm burden in vitro, but they do not demonstrate eradication or provide evidence for clinical efficacy or safety. Further studies using multispecies biofilm models, clinical isolates, host-relevant substrates, and in vivo or ex vivo systems are required before implications for clinical management of oral Candida-associated conditions can be drawn.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.D.-M. and J.F.-R.; methodology, D.D.-M.; software, J.F.-R.; validation, D.D.-M., J.F.-R. and M.K.; formal analysis, D.D.-M.; investigation, J.F.-R.; resources, D.S.; data curation, D.D.-M., J.F.-R. and M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.D.-M.; writing—review and editing, J.F.-R. and M.K.; visualization, R.W.; supervision, D.S.; project administration, D.D.-M.; funding acquisition, J.F.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All generated data is available in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Perić, M.; Miličić, B.; Kuzmanović Pfićer, J.; Živković, R.; Arsić Arsenijević, V. A systematic review of denture stomatitis: Predisposing factors, clinical features, etiology, and global Candida spp. distribution. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Patel, M. Oral cavity and Candida albicans: Colonisation to the development of infection. Pathogens 2022, 11, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.E.; Henriques, M. Candida sp. infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taff, H.T.; Mitchell, K.F.; Edwards, J.A.; Andes, D.R. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 2013, 8, 1325–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taylor, M.; Brizuela, M.; Raja, A. Oral candidiasis. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545282/ (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  6. Buyukhatipoglu, I.; Secilmis, A. The use of erbium:yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser in cavity preparation and surface treatment: Three-year follow-up. Eur. J. Dent. 2015, 9, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almoharib, H. Erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) lasers in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Cureus 2025, 17, e78279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, L.; Deng, J.; Ren, S. Clinical efficacy of Er:YAG lasers in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Palliat. Med. 2021, 10, 9002–9014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Badran, Z.; Bories, C.; Struillou, X.; Saffarzadeh, A.; Verner, C.; Soueidan, A. Er:YAG laser in the clinical management of severe peri-implantitis: A case report. J. Oral Implantol. 2011, 37, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dembicka-Mączka, D.; Kępa, M.; Fiegler-Rudol, J.; Grzech-Leśniak, Z.; Matys, J.; Grzech-Leśniak, K.; Wiench, R. Evaluation of the disinfection efficacy of Er:YAG laser light on single-species Candida biofilms: An in vitro study. Dent. J. 2025, 13, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sennhenn-Kirchner, S.; Schwarz, P.; Schliephake, H.; Konietschke, F.; Brunner, E.; Zepelin, M.B.-V. Decontamination efficacy of erbium:yttrium–aluminium–garnet and diode laser light on oral Candida albicans isolates of a five-day in vitro biofilm model. Lasers Med. Sci. 2009, 24, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meire, M.A.; Coenye, T.; Nelis, H.J.; De Moor, R.J.G. In vitro inactivation of endodontic pathogens with Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers. Lasers Med. Sci. 2012, 27, 695–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grzech-Leśniak, K.; Nowicka, J.; Pajączkowska, M.; Matys, J.; Szymonowicz, M.; Kuropka, P.; Rybak, Z.; Dobrzyński, M.; Dominiak, M. Effects of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on the growth of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro study. Lasers Med. Sci. 2019, 34, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Polak, D.; Shani-Kdoshim, S.; Alias, M.; Shapira, L.; Stabholz, A. In vitro efficacy of biofilm removal from titanium surfaces using Er:YAG laser: Comparison of treatment protocols and ablation parameters. J. Periodontol. 2022, 93, 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kriechbaumer, L.K.; Happak, W.; Distelmaier, K.; Thalhammer, G.; Kaiser, G.; Kugler, S.; Tan, Y.; Leonhard, M.; Zatorska, B.; Presterl, E.; et al. Disinfection of contaminated metal implants with an Er:YAG laser. J. Orthop. Res. 2020, 38, 2464–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Dembicka-Mączka, D.; Gryka-Deszczyńska, M.; Sitkiewicz, J.; Makara, A.; Fiegler-Rudol, J.; Wiench, R. Evaluation of the disinfection efficacy of Er:YAG laser light on single-species Candida biofilms: A systematic review. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Golob Deeb, J.; Smith, J.; Belvin, B.R.; Lewis, J.; Grzech-Leśniak, K. Er:YAG laser irradiation reduces microbial viability when used in combination with sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and hydrogen peroxide. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Reddy, N.; Golob Deeb, J.; Kitten, T.; Carrico, C.K.; Grzech-Leśniak, K. In vitro effect of laser irradiation and chemical reagents on reducing root caries bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eick, S.; Meier, I.; Spoerlé, F.; Bender, P.; Aoki, A.; Izumi, Y.; Salvi, G.E.; Sculean, A. In vitro activity of Er:YAG laser compared with other treatment modalities on biofilm ablation from implant and tooth surfaces. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meire, M.A.; Coenye, T.; Nelis, H.J.; De Moor, R.J.G. Evaluation of Nd:YAG and Er:YAG irradiation, antibacterial photodynamic therapy, and sodium hypochlorite treatment on Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. Int. Endod. J. 2012, 45, 482–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zaitsev, A.E.; Asanov, O.N. Erbium:yttrium aluminium garnet laser therapy versus sharp debridement in chronic lower extremity ulcers: A randomized controlled trial. Int. Wound J. 2025, 22, e70688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gaspar, A.; Calderon, A.; Mora, J.V.; Silva, J.; Bojanini, J.F.; Araujo, M.J.; Geada, L.L.; Ivanova, E.; Helvacioglu, Y.; Coello, P.P.; et al. Impact of non-ablative erbium laser therapy on recurrent vaginal candidiasis. Lasers Surg. Med. 2025, 57, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kasić, S.; Knezović, M.; Beader, N.; Gabrić, D.; Malčić, A.I.; Baraba, A. Efficacy of Three Different Lasers on Eradication of Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans Biofilms in Root Canal System. Photomed Laser Surg. 2017, 35, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Saffarpour, A.; Fekrazad, R.; Heibati, M.N.; Bahador, A.; Saffarpour, A.; Rokn, A.; Iranparvar, A.; KharaziFard, M. Bactericidal effect of Er:YAG laser and photodynamic therapy on Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans biofilm on implant surfaces. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2016, 31, e71–e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gonçalves, F.; Zanetti, A.L.; Zanetti, R.V.; Martelli, F.S.; Avila-Campos, M.J.; Tomazinho, L.F.; Granjeiro, J.M. Effectiveness of diode and Nd:YAG lasers in implant disinfection. Photomed. Laser Surg. 2010, 28, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Strever, J.M.; Lee, J.; Ealick, W.; Peacock, M.; Shelby, D.; Susin, C.; Mettenberg, D.; El-Awady, A.; Rueggeberg, F.; Cutler, C.W. Er,Cr:YSGG laser ablates single-species biofilms on titanium disks without detectable surface damage. J. Periodontol. 2017, 88, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vaddamanu, S.K.; Vyas, R.; Kavita, K.; Sushma, R.; Rani, R.P.; Dixit, A.; Badiyani, B.K. In vitro comparison of dental laser and other treatment modalities on biofilm ablation from implant and tooth surfaces. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2022, 14, S530–S533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Arneiro, R.A.; Nakano, R.D.; Antunes, L.A.; Ferreira, G.B.; Fontes, K.; Antunes, L.S. Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. J. Oral Sci. 2014, 56, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Roi, C.I.; Roi, A.; Nicoară, A.; Nica, D.; Rusu, L.C.; Soancă, A.; Motofelea, A.C.; Riviș, M. Impact of Treatment on Systemic Immune-Inflammatory Index and Other Inflammatory Markers in Odontogenic Cervicofacial Phlegmon Cases: A Retrospective Study. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean viable counts of Candida colonies (CFUs) following Er:YAG laser irradiation at increasing fluence levels (0.8–2.0 J/cm2). Data represent mean ± SD for each species (n = 4). A progressive fluence-dependent reduction in viability is observed; most pronounced for C. albicans and C. glabrata.
Figure 1. Mean viable counts of Candida colonies (CFUs) following Er:YAG laser irradiation at increasing fluence levels (0.8–2.0 J/cm2). Data represent mean ± SD for each species (n = 4). A progressive fluence-dependent reduction in viability is observed; most pronounced for C. albicans and C. glabrata.
Jcm 15 00018 g001
Table 1. Parameters of Candida biofilm growth inhibition (7 mm spot size; 2 Hz).
Table 1. Parameters of Candida biofilm growth inhibition (7 mm spot size; 2 Hz).
Fluence [J/cm2]Power [W]Power Density [W/cm2]Pulse Energy [J]Total E (W × t) [J]
0.300.200.520.1224.0
0.400.300.780.1536.0
0.500.350.910.1942.0
0.600.451.170.2354.0
0.700.501.300.2760.0
0.800.601.560.3172.0
0.900.651.690.3578.0
1.000.751.950.3890.0
1.501.152.990.58138.0
2.001.503.900.77180.0
2.501.904.940.96228.0
3.002.305.981.15276.0
3.402.606.761.31312.0
Table 2. Elimination of mature Candida biofilms—fluence and power density parameters (7 mm spot size; 2 Hz; 120 s).
Table 2. Elimination of mature Candida biofilms—fluence and power density parameters (7 mm spot size; 2 Hz; 120 s).
Fluence [J/cm2]Power [W]Power Density [W/cm2]Pulse Energy [J]Total E (W × t) [J]
0.800.601.560.3172.0
1.000.751.950.3890.0
1.501.152.990.58138.0
2.001.503.900.77180.0
Table 3. Growth inhibition zone (GIZ) diameters (mm) of single-species Candida biofilms 24 h after Er:YAG laser irradiation at increasing fluence levels. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Table 3. Growth inhibition zone (GIZ) diameters (mm) of single-species Candida biofilms 24 h after Er:YAG laser irradiation at increasing fluence levels. Values are expressed as mean ± SD.
Fluence (J/cm2)C. albicansC. glabrataC. parapsilosisC. krusei
0.35.5 ± 0.24.0 ± 0.15.1 ± 0.25.0 ± 0.2
0.45.5 ± 0.24.2 ± 0.15.3 ± 0.25.1 ± 0.2
0.55.6 ± 0.24.4 ± 0.15.5 ± 0.25.2 ± 0.2
0.66.5 ± 0.34.6 ± 0.16.1 ± 0.35.3 ± 0.2
0.76.6 ± 0.34.7 ± 0.16.4 ± 0.35.6 ± 0.2
0.86.7 ± 0.34.8 ± 0.16.7 ± 0.35.9 ± 0.2
0.96.8 ± 0.34.9 ± 0.16.9 ± 0.36.1 ± 0.2
1.06.8 ± 0.35.0 ± 0.17.0 ± 0.36.2 ± 0.2
1.56.9 ± 0.35.1 ± 0.17.3 ± 0.36.5 ± 0.2
2.07.1 ± 0.35.1 ± 0.17.4 ± 0.36.7 ± 0.2
2.57.2 ± 0.35.2 ± 0.17.6 ± 0.36.9 ± 0.2
3.07.3 ± 0.35.2 ± 0.17.7 ± 0.37.0 ± 0.2
3.47.4 ± 0.35.2 ± 0.17.7 ± 0.37.0 ± 0.2
Table 4. Reduction in Candida viability with increasing fluence (J/cm2). Mean ± SD values are shown for each species (n = 4).
Table 4. Reduction in Candida viability with increasing fluence (J/cm2). Mean ± SD values are shown for each species (n = 4).
SpeciesConcentrationMeanSD
C. albicans0.816425.07322609
182.756.652067348
1.533.57.549834435
216.55.196152423
C. glabrata0.8103.55.446711546
151.52.886751346
1.527.752.986078811
220.751.707825128
C. parapsilosis0.8863.651483717
155.252.217355783
1.537.52.081665999
2552.160246899
C. krusei0.8106.255.057996968
1622.581988897
1.540.251.707825128
247.52.081665999
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dembicka-Mączka, D.; Fiegler-Rudol, J.; Kępa, M.; Skaba, D.; Wiench, R. Evaluation of the Influence of Er:YAG Laser Parameters on the Effectiveness of Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms: An In Vitro Study. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010018

AMA Style

Dembicka-Mączka D, Fiegler-Rudol J, Kępa M, Skaba D, Wiench R. Evaluation of the Influence of Er:YAG Laser Parameters on the Effectiveness of Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(1):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dembicka-Mączka, Diana, Jakub Fiegler-Rudol, Małgorzata Kępa, Dariusz Skaba, and Rafał Wiench. 2026. "Evaluation of the Influence of Er:YAG Laser Parameters on the Effectiveness of Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms: An In Vitro Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 1: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010018

APA Style

Dembicka-Mączka, D., Fiegler-Rudol, J., Kępa, M., Skaba, D., & Wiench, R. (2026). Evaluation of the Influence of Er:YAG Laser Parameters on the Effectiveness of Growth Inhibition of Candida Biofilms: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15010018

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop