Next Article in Journal
Predictors of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome in ICU Survivors After Discharge: An Observational Study
Previous Article in Journal
Glymphopathy and Reduced Processing Speed in Community-Dwelling Adults with Silent Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: A DTI-ALPS Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Opinion

Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications

by
Pablo De Gracia
1 and
Andrew D. Pucker
2,*
1
School of Optometry, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI 48377, USA
2
Eminent Ophthalmic Services, LLC, 386 Riley Circle NW, Milledgeville, GA 31061, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6040; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176040
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 18 August 2025 / Accepted: 21 August 2025 / Published: 26 August 2025

Abstract

Presbyopia is a ubiquitous age-related condition characterized by reduced near focusing ability due to lenticular stiffening. Pharmacologic agents such as pilocarpine have re-emerged as a less-invasive treatment option by inducing miosis and thereby enhancing depth of focus. However, the optimal pharmacologically induced pupil size that balances improved near vision with sufficient retinal illuminance remains undetermined. In this work, we present for the first time a direct integration of advanced theoretical modeling with a systematic synthesis of clinical trial outcomes to define the optimal target pupil size for pharmacologic presbyopia correction. We modeled visual performance using the Visual Strehl Ratio of the Optical Transfer Function (VSOTF) and convolved images of optotypes across a range of pupil diameters from 1.5 mm to 3.5 mm. This combined optical–clinical approach allowed us to quantitatively compare modeled image quality and depth of focus predictions with real-world clinical efficacy data from pilocarpine-based interventions. Simulations showed that smaller pupil sizes (1.5–2.5 mm) significantly extended depth of focus compared to standard multifocal optics while maintaining image quality within acceptable limits. These findings align with clinical trials of pilocarpine formulations, which commonly achieve post-treatment pupil diameters in the 2.0–2.5 mm range and are associated with clinically meaningful gains in near vision. Our analysis uniquely demonstrates that these clinically achieved pupil sizes closely match the theoretically optimal 2.0–3.0 mm range identified in our modeling, strengthening the evidence base for drug design and patient selection. These results reinforce the role of pharmacologically controlled pupil size as a central target in presbyopia management. By explicitly linking predictive optical modeling with aggregated clinical outcomes, we introduce a novel framework to guide future pharmacologic development strategies and refine clinical counseling in the emerging era of presbyopia therapeutics.
Keywords: presbyopia; pupil size; clinical trials; pilocarpine; visual performance presbyopia; pupil size; clinical trials; pilocarpine; visual performance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Gracia, P.; Pucker, A.D. Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176040

AMA Style

De Gracia P, Pucker AD. Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(17):6040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176040

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Gracia, Pablo, and Andrew D. Pucker. 2025. "Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 17: 6040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176040

APA Style

De Gracia, P., & Pucker, A. D. (2025). Pharmacological Modulation of Pupil Size in Presbyopia: Optical Modeling and Clinical Implications. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(17), 6040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop