You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Download PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

22 August 2025

Injury Characteristics and Physical Therapy Management Strategies for Circus Artists: A Scoping Review

,
,
and
1
Alliance Physical Therapy, Baltimore, MD 21211, USA
2
Program in Physical Therapy, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20006, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med.2025, 14(17), 5948;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14175948
This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Updates in Physiotherapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Background: Circus arts are gaining popularity across the globe and lifespan. Despite growing participation rates, there is limited high-quality evidence describing the physical therapy evaluation and management of injury within this population. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify and summarize evidence related to the injury characteristics and management of circus artists. Methods: With a research librarian, computerized searches were developed and performed using online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Cochrane), gray literature and non-medical databases. Two authors independently voted on article inclusion with a third author blinded to previous voting used in case of conflict. Concept mapping identified five primary themes related to circus injuries and physical therapy treatment. Data was extracted from each article based on content relevant to the classification. Results: In total, 1095 titles were retrieved from electronic searches, of which 49 studies were included. Overall, 20 studies related to injury characteristics, 10 to risk factors, 9 to each psychosocial variables and interventions, and 8 to screening. Acrobats with required ground elements were the most commonly injured discipline, particularly at the shoulder, ankle and spine. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors were identified and numerous psychosocial and lifestyle contributing factors were reported. Literature guiding treatment is limited. Conclusions: This scoping review mapped and synthesized evidence related to the evaluation and management of circus artist injuries. While injury patterns and characteristics are generally understood, the treatment of this population is poorly described. Clear gaps in screening, injury prevention strategies, and interventions for this group were identified.

1. Introduction

Circus arts are practiced globally in a variety of contexts, with expertise ranging from professional companies to recreational participants. In the United States participation in the circus arts has grown substantially, with more than 78% of the circus organizations founded after 2000 [1]. Of these circus organizations, 74.4% offer adult recreational classes. The circus arts are highly demanding athletic activities that require similar strength, balance, flexibility, and motor coordination to gymnastics [2], and activity that carries substantial injury risk [3]. Coupled with these sport-specific demands, there is often a high work load and short recovery time due to frequent performance schedules [4]. Even for professionals, performance and training may require considerable travel, and access to appropriate care may not be perceived to be available [5]. Respecting these variables, it becomes apparent that circus artist athletes are unique and their sport complex, and physical therapy management requires a deep understanding of the population.
Unfortunately, despite the need for high-quality evidence guiding management, available evidence includes inconsistent injury definitions for circus arts, making it difficult to compare and contrast trends. In 2020 Greenspan et al. [6] created an International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on reporting injury. The consensus statement comes after a 2017 systematic review including literature through March 2016, reporting substantial variance and a need for consistent reporting of musculoskeletal circus injuries [7]. The review noted a relatively low injury rate among professionals, ranging from 7.37 to 9.27/1000 artist exposures, mostly affecting the spine and ankle. Although not captured in the previous review, it should also be noted that circus artists may suffer from substantial emotional distress [8] which may elevate their risk of injury [9]. In addition to the substantial psychosocial demands, evaluation and management of injury is likely made challenging by the wide-ranging task-specific demands of circus arts. Greenspan [10] separated ground and aerial activity due to the differences in physical demands. Subgroups consisted of aerial acrobatics with ground elements, aerial acrobatics, ground acrobatics with human propulsion, ground acrobatics with balance/control, manipulation, and character. More research is needed to precisely describe injury patterns of this specialized group of athletes.
In addition to understanding injury patterns among circus artists, it seems appropriate to investigate factors that may elevate risk and develop instruments to identify potential risk prior to injury. Without validated pre-participation screening instruments, tools used in other similar sports (e.g., gymnastics) could be useful. In fact, perhaps due to sport-specific similarities, some gymnasts transition to careers in circus arts [11]. However, while the evaluation and management of gymnastics injuries has been well described [12,13,14,15], the management of circus artist injuries is not. In fact, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial with circus artist participants. Clinical reasoning and treatment decision making should be guided by high-quality evidence, but none appears available for circus artists. In order to create baseline knowledge to guide clinicians, an extensive evaluation of available evidence describing the treatment of the injured circus artist is required.
Despite the rapid increase in circus arts participation at the professional and recreational level and subsequent injury risk, there is limited evidence describing circus arts, particularly the contemporary injury patterns and treatment approaches. Synthesized evidence can help to inform clinical practice and identify literature gaps to guide future research, but such evidence does not exist for this unique population. This scoping review aims to identify and report on the injury characteristics and management strategies for circus artists.

2. Materials and Methods

This scoping review was pre-registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) website 8 March 2024, and is freely available online. Reporting followed guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

2.1. Data Sources and Searches

A comprehensive and systematic computerized search of the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, the Cochrane library, and SPORTDiscus was conducted to identify articles relevant to the clinical question. All articles from database inception through 3 September 2024 were considered for inclusion. With the assistance of a research librarian, key search terms and various combinations of synonyms related to the concepts of injury characteristics and management of circus artists were entered into each database. Specific search strategies are presented in the Supplementary Materials. The reference lists of eligible articles were manually examined for key review articles and additional relevant studies. Finally, clinical trial registries, Google, and the Open Grey database were scanned for pertinent work not captured otherwise.
A basic example search string is as follows, with relevant truncation, adjustments, Boolean operators, and MeSH terms used depending on the database: (“circus artist*” OR circus OR aerialist* OR acrobat*) AND ((“Wounds and Injuries” [Mesh] OR “Epidemiologic Methods” [Mesh]) OR (injury AND (prevention OR assessment OR screening)) OR (“Psychiatry and Psychology Category” [Mesh] OR psychosocial) AND (“Physical Therapy Modalities” [Mesh] OR “physical therapy” OR physiotherapy OR rehabilitation OR recovery OR “conservative management”)).

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Studies were considered in this review if they related to the clinical question and had a full-text report published in the English language in a peer-reviewed journal. The clinical question was categorized into thematic areas after concept mapping was completed by the research team (Figure 1). For inclusion, the population of interest was circus artists and the study aim was related to any of the following: injury trends or characteristics, risk factors, screening or injury prevention instruments, physical therapy management or psychosocial variables. Studies were excluded if they were published in abstract form only or protocols, were not in the English language or reasonably translated to English, not related to circus artists, primarily related to gymnasts or dancers, or if they were not within the scope of injury characteristics or management.
Figure 1. Concept map of circus artist injury characteristics.

2.3. Study Selection

Prior to screening, all individuals involved in screening used 10 titles for a reliability exercise. Each individual independently voted for inclusion or exclusion, and upon completion, the authors met to discuss results, appropriateness for decision making, and create a consensus for future screening principles. After the electronic search was completed and duplicates removed, two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts for eligibility using the web-based literature review manager Covidence, with criteria determined a priori. After the preliminary search of the above databases, any article that included circus artists and injury characteristics or management was retained for further analysis. In cases where details of the study methods were unclear, the study’s corresponding author was contacted for additional information. Amongst those articles in which disagreement occurred, a third author blinded to previous voting made the final decision for inclusion. Full-text articles were procured through institutional access, interlibrary loan, or requesting copies from the corresponding authors. After full-text articles were obtained, two reviewers independently evaluated the study for appropriateness. If consensus regarding inclusion was not achieved, a third author blinded to previous voting was consulted for a final vote to include or exclude the article.

2.4. Data Extraction and Reporting

Upon final full-text article inclusion, data from studies were extracted to standardized forms. Grouping of data was subclassified into the 5 thematic areas. In cases where studies were pertinent to multiple concepts (e.g., injury patterns and risk factors), data was extracted and reported for each rather than one. Data was extracted by an author and independently cross-checked for accuracy and consistency by a separate author. An assessment of available evidence, and strength of evidence, was synthesized qualitatively.

2.5. Quality Assessment

The purpose of this scoping review was not to determine individual study quality as much as the overall quality of evidence related to a given topic. No formal assessment of study quality was performed for this project.

3. Results

In total 1094 titles were retrieved from the searches. After the removal of duplicates, 817 studies were screened, of which 49 studies were retained for final inclusion in this scoping review (Figure 2). The study design and primary themes of the studies are presented in Figure 3. The highest proportion of studies were related to injury characteristics (n = 20) followed almost equivalently by studies related to interventions, psychosocial variables, risk factors and screening methods for circus artists. Nine studies were tagged with multiple classifications. Less consistent than the number of studies evaluating a given topic was the sample size associated with the topic. Of the 10,272 unique participants included in all retained studies related to circus artists, 5397 (50.26%) participants were included in the 20 studies examining injury characteristics as compared to only 57 (0.55%) participants in the 9 studies describing management of injury (Figure 4).
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 3. Study design type frequency by characteristic.
Figure 4. Proportion of included studies (left) and sample size (right) by injury characteristic.

3.1. Injury Patterns

The type of studies related to injury patterns is presented in Figure 3. Of the 20 studies, there were 2 systematic reviews [7,16], 7 cohort studies [2,4,10,17,18,19,20], 1 longitudinal study [21], 2 cross-sectional studies [22,23], 2 descriptive epidemiological studies [24,25], 1 retrospective descriptive epidemiology study [26], 1 case series [27], 1 narrative review [28], and 2 case reports [29,30]. Sample size ranged from 1 to 1376 participants with a diverse level of performer expertise (e.g., professional versus pre-professional, adolescents versus adult circus performers). There was notable variation in injury reporting, particularly as it related to the athlete characteristics, type and impact of injuries. Specific data from individual studies is presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Studies reporting on injury patterns in circus artists.
Of the 20 studies, 9 did not specifically report the mechanism of injury. There were five studies reporting overuse conditions to be most prominent, five reporting traumatic injuries to be most prominent, and one study noting that trauma occurred more frequently in adolescents while overuse was more common in adults. One study used the recently developed circus-specific extension of the International Olympic Committee injury recording guidelines [10], while two studies used and adapted version of the International Association of Dance Medicine and Science (IADMS) Standard Consensus Initiative guidelines [2,17]. Outside of these studies, reporting differed across author groups.
Grouping of participant discipline for injuries varied between studies. Greenspan [2] described circus athletes in the following groups: aerial acrobatics with ground elements, aerial acrobatics, ground acrobatics with human propulsion, ground acrobatics with balance/control, manipulation, and character. A separate study used acrobat, non-acrobat, and musician to broadly classify circus artists [24]. The authors used the terms acrobat to describe a performer that required gymnastics, diving, martial arts, and aerial movements, non-acrobat to describe dancers, jugglers, swimmers, clowns, and characters in a show that do not perform gymnastic or martial arts or aerial movements, and musician to describe people that play music. Alternatively, Orlando et al. [20] utilized the terms sudden load, non-sudden load, and musicians to categorize circus injury.
The types of injuries encountered were more consistent across studies than the way injuries were reported. Injury rates ranged from 1.89 to 9.7; however, studies varied rates based on hours or exposures. Acrobats who performed ground elements were the most commonly injured discipline. Although most injuries likely led to some time away from their sport, time lost (TL) injuries were explicitly detailed in 7/20 (35%) studies. When considering the type of tissue injured, three studies reported joint injuries to be most common while three studies noted muscle/tendon injuries to be most common. While all body regions were prone to injury, the most commonly injured sites are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5. Most frequently reported circus injury sites.

3.2. Risk Factors

Of the 49 studies included, 10 studies [9,10,17,20,25,28,31,32,33,34] were related to risk factors (Figure 3) with a total of 4459 participants analyzed. Extracted data from individual studies is presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Risk factors for circus artist injuries.
Risk factors were analyzed in extrinsic and intrinsic categories. Extrinsic risk factors were broadly related to performance demands and environment (high performance workload and frequency with a lack of rest [20,32,33]). Pre-professional artists had higher injury rates (4.08/1000 sessions) compared to professional artists (3.49/1000) and those requiring sudden-load discipline demands also were at higher risk than other disciplines (5.93/1000 to 4.26/1000) [10,20]. Qualitative data identified poor touring conditions and weather as a risk factor for injury [32]. Intrinsic risk factors included older age [10,17,34], female sex [10,34], disordered eating [10], and psychological factors (e.g., self-efficacy, emotional exhaustion, higher mental load) [9,32,33]. There were conflicting results related to previous injury being a risk factor for a future injury [9,20,31], which is consistent with Shrier et al. [25], who reported that observed injury risk was not consistent with theoretical injury risk.

3.3. Screening

Of the 49 studies included, 10 studies [23,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] were related to screening tools or principles in circus artists (Figure 3) reporting on a total of 913 participants, with individual study data presented in Table 3. Studies included participants across the expertise spectrum, from professionals with Cirque du Soleil through pre-professionals/amateurs, although participant skill was unspecified in three studies. Two screening-related studies were narrative reviews which suggested screening for physical performance, hypermobility, training and lifestyle [36] or using a movement system impairment classification [41]. Four of the studies [35,39,40,43] completed physical performance testing relevant to participant screening. Circus artists were found to have generally more than normal mobility although findings were not discipline-specific. Not all physical testing may provide consistent results; specifically, the Harvard step test, 60 s jump test, and dynamic balance test did not have good reliability in circus athlete testing [35]. Four studies [23,37,38,42] screened mental health, mood, lifestyle and perceptions of health. Studies found self-reported outcomes were feasibly completed and students had different baseline measures compared to professionals. Instruments identified different mood levels at different time points (e.g., beginning versus end of a semester) although surveys can be perceived as burdensome if distributed too frequently [42].
Table 3. Studies reporting on screening tools or principles in circus artists.

3.4. Interventions

Of the 49 studies included, 9 were related to the physical therapy management of circus artists (Figure 3) with a total of 57 participants included [33,36,41,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Intervention-specific data is presented in Table 4. Narrative review and suggestion topics were related to making interventions patient-specific, using a movement systems-based approach, and using an interdisciplinary management strategy. Cohort design studies reported on the use of telehealth to treat atraumatic shoulder instability or feasibility of a calf muscle strengthening program. Case reports detailed the management of traumatic soft tissue tears or symptoms associated with hypermobility. No randomized controlled trials or comparative studies examining the effects of interventions for the circus artist were found in this scoping review. Of the five studies including the management of patients, as compared to suggestions, reviews, or feasibility studies, each reported clinically significant improvement in pain and/or functional outcomes. However, only three of the five studies (26 patients) reported on long-term follow-up [47,48,49].
Table 4. Studies related to the physical therapy management of circus artists.

3.5. Psychosocial Variables

Of the 49 studies included, 9 studies were related to psychosocial variables (Figure 3) [5,8,9,11,50,51,52,53,54]. A total of 961 unique circus artists were included with relevant study results presented in Table 5. There was a nearly equal range of expertise, as three studies included professional or retired circus artists [5,9,11], three studies included pre-professional circus artists [50,51,54], and three studies included professional and pre-professional circus artists [8,52,53]. Eight of the studies reported on participants’ mental health or emotional perceptions of their body, career, or lifestyle. Four of these studies reported on stress and negative emotions, two studies reported on fatigue, three studies reported on anxiety and fear, one study reported on depression, and one study reported on overall mental health. Overall, results indicated high levels of fatigue, negative emotions, increased anxiety, and low self-efficacy.
Table 5. Studies reporting on psychosocial variables in circus artists.

4. Discussion

This scoping review sought to describe injury characteristics and management strategies for circus artists. Circus arts participation is becoming more popular across the lifespan, and research is helping to identify injury trends and those at risk for injury. However, based on the results of this review, there appears to be substantial variation in reporting, few appropriate screening instruments for injury risk mitigation, and minimal evidence guiding the treatment of circus artist injuries.
Based on the results of this scoping review, the largest proportion of retained articles were related to the injury patterns and trends of circus artists. In a 2017 systematic review of circus artist injuries, Wolfenden and Angioi identified eight studies reporting on 4795 participants (1281 of which were duplicated from two studies) [7]. This scoping review found 11 new studies on injury patterns since that publication, suggesting a growing scholarly interest in the topic. Despite reporting variability, this review identified acrobats performing ground elements to be the most commonly injured discipline, the shoulder, ankle and spine to be common regions of injury, joint and muscle/tendon tissues to be commonly injured, and traumatic and overuse injuries to be equally common. Physical therapists are well-positioned to manage the gamut of circus injuries, but knowing the task-specific demands and mechanism of injury can allow for comprehensive and individualized care.
Variability and inconsistency across studies can make synthesis of findings difficult. Although a circus-specific reporting extension of the IOC consensus statement was published in 2022 [6], knowledge translation can take time, and only one study implemented the reporting methodology [10]. The lack of standardized surveillance, in part due to heterogeneity among study design and injury definitions, should be rectified for future prospective protocols across circus disciplines. Additionally, the potential for underreporting should be considered. In a recent systematic review, between 20 and 91% of workers failed to report their injury to their supervisors or worker’s compensation, with a variety of socioeconomic and employment characteristics, psychosocial variables, and healthcare providers often cited as contributing factors [55]. Circus artists may have pessimistic views of healthcare for their conditions and substantial internal and external pressure to push through injuries [5]. The quantitative results of this review related to injury patterns should be considered in context of possible underestimation.
This review identified intrinsic (personal) and extrinsic (environmental) risk factors that impact injury. Intrinsic risk factors identified were chronological age, history of eating disorder, and sex at birth, while extrinsic risk factors were type of performer, level of performer, and rest time between performances [17]. Greenspan [10,17] and Hamilton [34] found chronological age and age over 30 were associated with increased risk of injury. This contrasts with injury trends in gymnastics, where adolescents face a higher risk. The discrepancy may stem from differences in participation patterns, as adults are more likely to engage in circus arts, whereas gymnastics is predominantly practiced by younger individuals [56]. Individuals with an eating disorder averaged increased injury rates than individuals without an eating disorder [10], which is consistent with previous work in high school athletes [57]. This may be related to body image and esthetic expectations of circus performers [54] and possible exercise addiction [53] with implications for injury for sudden-load disciplines. Three of the studies noted discipline type as a risk factor. Greenspan [17] identified aerial with ground elements to have higher instances of injury per 1000 exposures, whereas Hamilton identified sudden load to have higher rate of time loss injuries [34]. Although higher workload and less rest between practice or performance were identified as risk factors for circus injuries [32,33], so too was being a pre-professional or less experienced artist [10]. Given the highly specialized and intricate physical demands of circus artists, good technique and appropriate rest are important factors in reducing injury risk. If clinicians are aware of common risk factors for injury in circus artists, they can create and implement screening and prevention strategies and create physical therapy plans of care that minimize risk of reinjury.
This review identified various screening tools and processes utilized for circus artists. Professional circus artists made up 68% of the studies included and pre-professional circus artists made up 32% of the studies. There was variation in assessment timing, which was collected at a single time point [35] or serially [23] at different points during a circus artists’ career. Callahan et al. [36] emphasized the importance of posture and movement retraining, education on when to use a mid versus full range of motion, and strength training to manage hypermobility. Although the authors did not suggest a specific strength training program, high-load strength training was superior in the short term to low-load training for individuals with hypermobile shoulders [58]. Long-term effectiveness was not different and the study did not include elite-level athletes, which limits generalizability to this population. Various testing modes including functional tests, manual muscle tests, dynamometers, and isokinetic testing were used to assess muscle performance [36,39,40,43]. The authors found that female circus artists tend to have greater passive range of motion compared to males, and professionals had greater muscle performance compared to pre-professionals. This may be a contributing factor associated with the greater injury risk of female athletes and pre-professionals.
Despite the substantial amount of evidence detailing injury patterns in the circus athlete population, there is a relative dearth of literature guiding the physical therapy management of this unique group. While some task-specific movements mimic those required in other well-researched sports (e.g., gymnastics, dance, cheerleading), the management of this group compared to its similar activities is nearly non-existent. The treatment of only 57 unique participants was identified with this review, approximately 0.5% of the total population assessed. Available evidence is limited to small cohorts, case studies, or suggestions, preventing the assessment of treatment effectiveness. From the limited evidence, clinicians can imply that circus artists who have substantial and unique physical and psychological demands require multimodal and tailored rehabilitation programs. One could postulate that the limited data describing circus athlete management parallels the psychosocial findings of this review, identifying a lack of willingness of circus artists to report injuries or perceived challenges with obtaining appropriate sport-specific care [5]. Recognizing that circus artists may be required to travel for performances, it may be difficult to establish continuous care. While telehealth options may be appropriate [46,47], classic in-person physical therapy care may be challenging and should be reconceptualized for this population. The discrepancy between rising circus performance popularity and injury research compared to intervention studies highlights the need for additional high-quality research.
This review found that circus artists and circus students reported high rates of mental health issues, including depression, anxiety, sleep deprivation, and stress. While none of the psychological studies included a control group of non-circus participants, 88.8% of the studies on psychological variables found emergence of negative emotions surrounding their craft [5,8,9,50,51,52,53,54]. Circus artists’ livelihood is dependent on how they are able to physically perform both during training and performances. Shrier [9] reported that high fatigue, emotional exhaustion, injury, and low self-efficacy put an individual at a 2–3× increased risk for injury. High stress and/or anxiety was reported in 55.5% of the psychological studies for circus artists [8,9,11,50,51]. Being impeded from doing one’s job can result in a mass of negative emotions, whereas having a more positive disposition has been found to improve long-term recovery and survival [59]. While circus artists experience many negative emotions, they also report a high amount of resiliency and motivation in their craft [8,11]. Poor sleep quality and high fatigue levels were another major theme reported among circus artists [9,50,51]. Previous research has suggested that a lack of sleep may put an individual at a greater risk of injury [60]. If an artist is stressed or anxious, this may lead to poor sleep, which in turn may predispose them to a higher likelihood of injury, which will begin a perpetuating cycle. This cycle has been previously discussed in the context of elite athletes [61]. Poor sleep hygiene also imposes a delay in injury recovery [62,63]. While impaired sleep and anxiety were not compared to one another in the included studies, these characteristics were reported in as high in 100% of the population in studies that reported data on those variables [9,37,51]. Evaluating negative psychosocial and lifestyle variables involved in an individual’s healthcare experience is essential, and physical therapists should recognize the prevalence of these problems in circus athletes.
While this review is novel and carries important clinical and research implications, there are limitations. The literature search included numerous databases and gray literature, and was created collaboratively by authors with systematic review experience and a research librarian. However, it is possible that potentially relevant work was not retained by the search itself or during the screening process. Specific clinical guidance offered from this report is limited, in large part due to limited evidence and variable reporting. However, the synthesis of key concepts related to the management of circus artists identified important information and opportunities for investigation. While not required for scoping reviews, if quality assessment was formally completed for the included studies, additional information could be provided regarding the topic.
While this review identified and synthesized key aspects of injury patterns and management strategies, a number of evidence gaps were recognized. The average age range across studies varied from 11 to 34 years old. According to the 2022 Circus Census Report, circus performers ranged in age from 6 to 55 and beyond [1]. Additional data on participants aged 6–11 and adults over 34 would help create a more comprehensive understanding of the entire circus artist community. Although the synthesized results of this review help understand injury patterns, it is clear that screening tools and management strategies are limited. Developing and validating sport- and discipline-specific physical and holistic screening instruments can allow clinicians to identify pre-participation injury risk and implement preventative programs to minimize or mitigate the risk. Finally, it is clear that although much is known about how circus artists get injured, and what their injury experience entails, the management of circus injuries is absent. Studies evaluating and describing the effectiveness of intervention strategies are needed. Specifically, comparative studies including multiple treatment options or patient populations would be useful.

5. Conclusions

The purpose of this review was to describe the evidence related to the injury characteristics and management strategies for circus artists. This review found injury trends and characteristics are well-researched but variably reported. Acrobats, particularly those incorporating ground elements, are most often injured, with shoulder, ankle, and spine injuries commonly reported. Although some risk factors are known and can predict who may develop injury, few sport-specific screening tools are available or used for this unique population. Further proactive assessment of psychological variables and screening instruments for this population appear warranted. Importantly, the physical therapy management of circus injuries is limited to few studies of low-level evidence and should be a point of emphasis in this scholarly area. While a growing population globally, the evidence related to physical therapy evaluation and management of circus artists would benefit from consistent reporting and high-quality prospective and comparative studies.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm14175948/s1: Supplementary: Circus artist scoping review search strings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S. and D.J.J.; methodology, J.S., D.J.J., C.H. and D.A.S.; software, D.J.J.; validation, J.S., D.J.J., C.H. and D.A.S.; formal analysis, J.S., D.J.J., C.H. and D.A.S.; investigation, J.S., D.J.J. and C.H.; resources, D.J.J.; data curation, D.J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S., D.J.J. and C.H.; writing—review and editing, J.S., D.J.J., C.H. and D.A.S.; visualization, D.J.J.; supervision, D.J.J.; project administration, J.S. and D.J.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was deemed exempt for formal institutional review due to the study design using previously published data.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided within the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. American Circus Educators, C.C.T. Circus Consensus 2022. Available online: https://www.americancircuseducators.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ACE-AYCO-Survey-Final-Report.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2025).
  2. Greenspan, S. Injury Patterns in Subgroups of Circus Artists by Circus Discipline: A Pilot Study. Orthop. Phys. Ther. Pract. 2022, 34, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell, R.A.; Bradshaw, E.J.; Ball, N.B.; Pease, D.L.; Spratford, W. Injury epidemiology and risk factors in competitive artistic gymnasts: A systematic review. Br. J. Sports Med. 2019, 53, 1056–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stubbe, J.H.; Richardson, A.; van Rijn, R.M. Prospective cohort study on injuries and health problems among circus arts students. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2018, 4, e000327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cayrol, T.; Godfrey, E.; Draper-Rodi, J.; Bearne, L. Exploring Professional Circus Artists’ Experience of Performance-Related Injury and Management: A Qualitative Study. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2019, 34, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Greenspan, S.; Munro, D.; Nicholas, J.; Stubbe, J.; Stuckey, M.I.; Van Rijn, R.M. Circus-specific extension of the International Olympic Committee 2020 consensus statement: Methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sport. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2022, 8, e001394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wolfenden, H.E.; Angioi, M. Musculoskeletal Injury Profile of Circus Artists: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2017, 32, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. van Rens, F.E.C.A.; Heritage, B. Mental health of circus artists: Psychological resilience, circus factors, and demographics predict depression, anxiety, stress, and flourishing. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2021, 53, 101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shrier, I.; Hallé, M. Psychological predictors of injuries in circus artists: An exploratory study. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45, 433–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Greenspan, S.; Stuckey, M.I. Untangling risk factors including discipline-specific exposure for injuries in preprofessional and professional circus artists in the USA. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2023, 9, e001551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. van Rens, F.E.C.A.; Filho, E. Realizing, Adapting, and Thriving in Career Transitions From Gymnastics to Contemporary Circus Arts. J. Clin. Sport Psychol. 2020, 14, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Desai, N.; Vance, D.D.; Rosenwasser, M.P.; Ahmad, C.S. Artistic Gymnastics Injuries; Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Treatment. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2019, 27, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sweeney, E.A.; Howell, D.R.; James, D.A.; Potter, M.N.; Provance, A.J. Returning to Sport After Gymnastics Injuries. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 376–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hart, E.; Meehan, W.P., 3rd; Bae, D.S.; d’Hemecourt, P.; Stracciolini, A. The Young Injured Gymnast: A Literature Review and Discussion. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2018, 17, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thomas, R.E.; Thomas, B.C. A systematic review of injuries in gymnastics. Physician Sportsmed. 2019, 47, 96–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kraan, R.B.; Beers, L.; van de Pol, D.; Daams, J.G.; Maas, M.; Kuijer, P.P. A systematic review on posterior circumflex humeral artery pathology: Sports and professions at risk and associated risk factors. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2019, 59, 1058–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Greenspan, S. Injury Frequency and Characteristics in Adolescent and Adult Circus Artists: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2021, 36, 103–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hakim, H.; Puel, F.; Bertucci, W. Injury assessment in circus student-artists population; preliminary study. Sci. Sports 2020, 35, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Munro, D. Injury patterns and rates amongst students at the national institute of circus arts: An observational study. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2014, 29, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Orlando, C.; Levitan, E.B.; Mittleman, M.A.; Steele, R.J.; Shrier, I. The effect of rest days on injury rates. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2011, 21, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stuckey, M.I.; Bruinooge, B.; Aubertin, P.; Kriellaars, D. Clinical Burden of Injuries in Students at a Professional Circus College: A 7.5-Year Longitudinal Study. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2022, 37, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Long, A.S.; Ambegaonkar, J.P.; Fahringer, P.M. Injury reporting rates and injury concealment patterns differ between high-school cirque performers and basketball players. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2011, 26, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rossini, B.; Anstruther, M.; Fortin, M. Comparing assessment methods of low back pain related disability in student circus artists: A cross-sectional study. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil. 2024, 37, 1141–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shrier, I.; Meeuwisse, W.H.; Matheson, G.O.; Wingfield, K.; Steele, R.J.; Prince, F.; Hanley, J.; Montanaro, M. Injury patterns and injury rates in the circus arts: An analysis of 5 years of data from Cirque du Soleil. Am. J. Sports Med. 2009, 37, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shrier, I.; Mattiello, R.; Caron, M.; Verhagen, E.; Steele, R.J. Observed Injury Rates Did Not Follow Theoretically Predicted Injury Risk Patterns in Professional Human Circus Artists. Clin. J. Sport Med. 2022, 32, e627–e634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wanke, E.M.; McCormack, M.; Koch, F.; Wanke, A.; Groneberg, D.A. Acute injuries in student circus artists with regard to gender specific differences. Asian J. Sports Med. 2012, 3, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Asselin, N.; Proano, L.; Williams, K.; Partridge, R. Circus disaster: Case report, response, and review of injuries. Am. J. Disaster Med. 2016, 11, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Russell, J.A.; McIntyre, L.; Stewart, L.; Wang, T. Concussions in Dancers and Other Performing Artists. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 32, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Kashmiri, A.; Delaney, J.S. Case report: Fatigue fracture of the proximal fibula with secondary common peroneal nerve injury. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2007, 463, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wojciuk, J.; Bury, R.W.; Brack, M.J. Acrobatic vascular disease. Heart Vessel. 2006, 21, 199–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hamilton, G.M.; Meeuwisse, W.H.; Emery, C.A.; Steele, R.J.; Shrier, I. Past injury as a risk factor: An illustrative example where appearances are deceiving. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bolling, C.; Mellette, J.; Pasman, H.R.; van Mechelen, W.; Verhagen, E. From the safety net to the injury prevention web: Applying systems thinking to unravel injury prevention challenges and opportunities in Cirque du Soleil. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2019, 5, e000492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Faltus, J.; Richard, V. Considerations for the Medical Management of the Circus Performance Artist and Acrobat. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2022, 17, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hamilton, G.M.; Meeuwisse, W.H.; Emery, C.A.; Shrier, I. Examining the effect of the injury definition on risk factor analysis in circus artists. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2012, 22, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Burnstein, B.D.; Steele, R.J.; Shrier, I. Reliability of fitness tests using methods and time periods common in sport and occupational management. J. Athl. Train. 2011, 46, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Callahan, A.; Squires, A.; Greenspan, S. Management of Hypermobility in Aesthetic Performing Artists: A Review. Orthop. Phys. Ther. Pract. 2022, 34, 134–145. [Google Scholar]
  37. Decker, A.; Aubertin, P.; Kriellaars, D. Sleep and Fatigue of Elite Circus Student-Artists During One Year of Training. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2019, 34, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Donohue, B.; Gavrilova, Y.; Galante, M.; Burnstein, B.; Aubertin, P.; Gavrilova, E.; Funk, A.; Light, A.; Benning, S.D. Empirical development of a screening method for mental, social, and physical wellness in amateur and professional circus artists. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2020, 14, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Greenspan, S.J.; Stuckey, M.I. Preparation For Flight: The Physical Profile of Pre-Professional and Professional Circus Artists in the United States. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2024, 19, 591–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huberman, C.; Scales, M.; Vallabhajosula, S. Shoulder Range of Motion and Strength Characteristics in Circus Acrobats. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2020, 35, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Scherb, E. Low Back Pain in Circus Artists: Using a Movement System Impairment Framework as a Component of Care. Orthop. Phys. Ther. Pract. 2022, 34, 148–151. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shrier, I.; Raglin, J.S.; Levitan, E.B.; Mittleman, M.A.; Steele, R.J.; Powell, J. Procedures for assessing psychological predictors of injuries in circus artists: A pilot prospective study. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Smith, D.; Noorbhai, H. Prevalence of muscle imbalance and its potential influence on injury among female acrobatic dancers. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2022, 8, e001322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chimenti, R.L.; Van Dillen, L.R.; Khoo-Summers, L. Use of a Patient-Specific Outcome Measure and a Movement Classification System to Guide Nonsurgical Management of a Circus Performer with Low Back Pain: A Case Report. J. Danc. Med. Sci. 2017, 21, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fecteau, L.; Freitas, N. Management of Transitional Vertebra in An Amateur Level Teenage Circus Acrobat: A Case Report. Orthop. Phys. Ther. Pract. 2022, 34, 152–156. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ganderton, C.; Henry, M.; Walker, A.; McGinley, P.; Verhagen, E. Implementation of Calf Endurance Training in a Touring Group of Professional Circus Performers: A Feasibility Study. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2021, 36, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ganderton, C.L.; Tirosh, O.; Munro, D.; Meyer, D.; Lenssen, R.; Balster, S.; Watson, L.; Warby, S. Rehabilitation for atraumatic shoulder instability in circus arts performers: Delivery via telehealth. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2022, 31, e246–e257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roubea, I.; Korakakis, V. Rehabilitation following ulnar collateral ligament injury of the elbow in a female acrobatic athlete: A case report. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2024, 38, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Teo, W.Z.W.; Kaur, R.; Sebastin, S. Traumatic Rupture of the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris Muscle Belly in a Circus Rigger. J. Hand Surg. Asian Pac. Vol. 2021, 26, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Decker, A.; Richard, V.; Cairney, J.; Jefferies, P.; Houser, N.; Aubertin, P.; Kriellaars, D. Assessment of Professional Circus Students’ Psychological Characteristics at Four Strategic Timepoints over the Scholastic Year: A Longitudinal Study Using the Stress Process Model. Med. Probl. Perform. Art. 2022, 37, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Stubbe, J.H.; Tiemens, A.; Keizer-Hulsebosch, S.C.; Steemers, S.; van Winden, D.; Buiten, M.; Richardson, A.; van Rijn, R.M. Prevalence of Mental Health Complaints Among Performing Arts Students Is Associated With COVID-19 Preventive Measures. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 676587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van Rens, F.E.C.A.; Filho, E. Not just clowning around: Investigating psychological mechanisms underlying accidents in a heterogeneous group of contemporary circus artists. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 2021, 15, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. van Rens, F.E.C.A.; Metse, A.P.; Heritage, B. Exploring the mental health of circus artists: Circus factors, psychological resilience, and demographics predict disordered eating and exercise addictions. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2022, 59, 102107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Walby, K.; Stuart, S. “You Have to Accept the Pain”: Body Callusing and Body Capital in Circus Aerialism. Qual. Sociol. Rev. 2021, 17, 6–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kyung, M.; Lee, S.; Dancu, C.; Hong, O. Underreporting of workers’ injuries or illnesses and contributing factors: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2023, 23, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tisano, B.; Zynda, A.J.; Ellis, H.B.; Wilson, P.L. Epidemiology of Pediatric Gymnastics Injuries Reported in US Emergency Departments: Sex- and Age-Based Injury Patterns. Orthop. J. Sports Med. 2022, 10, 23259671221102478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rauh, M.J.; Nichols, J.F.; Barrack, M.T. Relationships among injury and disordered eating, menstrual dysfunction, and low bone mineral density in high school athletes: A prospective study. J. Athl. Train. 2010, 45, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liaghat, B.; Juul-Kristensen, B.; Faber, D.A.; Christensen, E.O.; Søgaard, K.; Skou, S.T.; Søndergaard, J.; Juhl, C.B. One-year effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: A secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Sports Med. 2024, 58, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lamers, S.M.A.; Bolier, L.; Westerhof, G.J.; Smit, F.; Bohlmeijer, E.T. The impact of emotional well-being on long-term recovery and survival in physical illness: A meta-analysis. J. Behav. Med. 2012, 35, 538–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grier, T.; Dinkeloo, E.; Reynolds, M.; Jones, B.H. Sleep duration and musculoskeletal injury incidence in physically active men and women: A study of U.S. Army Special Operation Forces soldiers. Sleep Health 2020, 6, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Vitale, J.A.; Mathieu, N.; Sabrina, S.; Michele, L. Editorial: The Reciprocal Relationship Between Sleep and Stress in Elite Athletes. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 797847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chennaoui, M.; Vanneau, T.; Trignol, A.; Arnal, P.; Gomez-Merino, D.; Baudot, C.; Perez, J.; Pochettino, S.; Eirale, C.; Chalabi, H. How does sleep help recovery from exercise-induced muscle injuries? J. Sci. Med. Sport 2021, 24, 982–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Copenhaver, E.A.; Diamond, A.B. The Value of Sleep on Athletic Performance, Injury, and Recovery in the Young Athlete. Pediatr. Ann. 2017, 46, e106–e111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Carbon Ion and Proton Therapy in Sacral Chordoma: A Systematic Review
Previous
The Impact of Social Factors on the Duration of Hospitalization for Tuberculosis
Next