This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Oncologic Outcomes in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma
by
Caroline Lenz
Caroline Lenz 1
,
Su Ir Lyu
Su Ir Lyu 2
,
Peter Mallmann
Peter Mallmann 1,
Bernd Morgenstern
Bernd Morgenstern 1 and
Fabinshy Thangarajah
Fabinshy Thangarajah 3,*
1
Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
2
Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
3
Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4057; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124057 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 19 April 2025
/
Revised: 27 May 2025
/
Accepted: 4 June 2025
/
Published: 8 June 2025
Abstract
Introduction: Vulvar carcinoma is a rare malignancy with approximately 3090 cases annually in Germany. Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva (SCC) can be HPV-associated or non-HPV-associated. Surgical excision is the primary treatment, but the optimal tumor-free resection margin remains debated. This study evaluates the impact of resection margin distance on disease prognosis in SCC patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with SCC of the vulva at the University Hospital of Cologne between 2007 and 2022. Patients with TNM stage pT1a or higher who underwent primary surgical treatment with a tumor-free resection margin status were included. The cohort of 73 patients was divided into three groups based on resection margin distance: >0.01–<0.3 cm (Group 1), ≥0.3–<0.8 cm (Group 2), and ≥0.8 cm (Group 3). Statistical analyses including logrank tests were performed to assess correlations between resection margin distance and recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 37.0% of patients were categorized into Group 1, 48.0% into Group 2, and 15.1% into Group 3. Disease recurrence occurred in 26% of patients, with rates of 31.6% in Group 1 (minimum resection margin distance), 42.1% in Group 2, and 26.3% in Group 3. The prevalence of recurrence was not dependent on resection margin distance (p = 0.28). Similarly, the prevalence of deaths was not dependent on resection margin distance (p = 0.43). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) did not show significant differences between the groups (p = 0.25 and p = 0.87, respectively). Conclusions: This study found no significant impact of pathological tumor-free resection margin distance on DFS or OS in patients with SCC of the vulva. Given the heterogeneity in international guidelines and existing literature, further studies with larger patient cohorts are needed to establish definitive surgical recommendations.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lenz, C.; Lyu, S.I.; Mallmann, P.; Morgenstern, B.; Thangarajah, F.
Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Oncologic Outcomes in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 4057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124057
AMA Style
Lenz C, Lyu SI, Mallmann P, Morgenstern B, Thangarajah F.
Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Oncologic Outcomes in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(12):4057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124057
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lenz, Caroline, Su Ir Lyu, Peter Mallmann, Bernd Morgenstern, and Fabinshy Thangarajah.
2025. "Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Oncologic Outcomes in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 12: 4057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124057
APA Style
Lenz, C., Lyu, S. I., Mallmann, P., Morgenstern, B., & Thangarajah, F.
(2025). Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Oncologic Outcomes in Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(12), 4057.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124057
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.