You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Review
  • Open Access

10 September 2021

Role of Advanced Glycation End-Products and Other Ligands for AGE Receptors in Thyroid Cancer Progression

,
,
,
and
1
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Chałubińskiego 10, 50-368 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Weigla 12, 53-114 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Section Otolaryngology

Abstract

To date, thyroid cancers (TCs) remain a clinical challenge owing to their heterogeneous nature. The etiopathology of TCs is associated not only with genetic mutations or chromosomal rearrangements, but also non-genetic factors, such as oxidative-, nitrosative-, and carbonyl stress-related alterations in tumor environment. These factors, through leading to the activation of intracellular signaling pathways, induce tumor tissue proliferation. Interestingly, the incidence of TCs is often coexistent with various simultaneous mutations. Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), their precursors and receptors (RAGEs), and other ligands for RAGEs are reported to have significant influence on carcinogenesis and TCs progression, inducing gene mutations, disturbances in histone methylation, and disorders in important carcinogenesis-related pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/NF-kB, p21/MEK/MPAK, or JAK/STAT, RAS/ERK/p53, which induce synthesis of interleukins, growth factors, and cytokines, thus influencing metastasis, angiogenesis, and cancer proliferation. Precursors of AGE (such as methylglyoxal (MG)) and selected ligands for RAGEs: AS1004, AS1008, and HMGB1 may, in the future, become potential targets for TCs treatment, as low MG concentration is associated with less aggressive anaplastic thyroid cancer, whereas the administration of anti-RAGE antibodies inhibits the progression of papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer. This review is aimed at collecting the information on the role of compounds, engaged in glycation process, in the pathogenesis of TCs. Moreover, the utility of these compounds in the diagnosis and treatment of TCs is thoroughly discussed. Understanding the mechanism of action of these compounds on TCs pathogenesis and progression may potentially be the grounds for the development of new treatment strategies, aiming at quality-of-life improvements.

1. Introduction

Thyroid cancer (TC) is the most common endocrine carcinoma, constituting over 95% of endocrine cancers and 3.4% of all carcinomas diagnosed annually all over the world [1]. The incidence of TCs has tripled within last 35 years in western European countries [2]. Moreover, thyroid cancer incidence in the United States between 1974–2013 increased, on average, 3.6% per year [3]. Apart from the increase of TCs incidence, an increase in mortality associated with TCs could be seen, since, during 1994–2013, the incidence-based mortality increased 1.1% per year (95% confidence interval 0.6–1.6%) [3]. These observations may indicate that an evolution of thyroid cancer biology may have an impact on both its incidence rate and its related mortality.
According to the World Health Organization classification, malignant thyroid cancers can be divided into five main histological types [4]: papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), poorly differentiated (PDTC), medullary (MTC), and anaplastic (ATC). Each of these types, except for MTC (derived from parafollicular, C cells), is derived from follicular cells. Research undoubtedly shows the complexity of thyroid tumors, as some of these tumors may be of mixed (follicular-parafollicular) origin [5]. In addition, many malignant neoplasms of the thyroid gland are lymphomas (most often B-cell) and sarcomas. Figure 1 shows division of malignant TCs and the descriptions of particular types of TCs are shown in Supplementary Materials (Table S1).
Figure 1. Types of malignant thyroid carcinomas. Malignant neoplasms of the thyroid gland are derived from parafollicular C cells (medullary tumor cancer, MTC) or from follicular cells (papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), poorly differentiated (PDTC), and anaplastic (ATC). Some TC tumors are of mixed (follicular-parafollicular) origin. TCs could also occur in the form of lymphomas (most often B-cell), sarcomas, teratomas, and squamous-cell thyroid carcinomas.
The diagnosis and implementation of proper treatment in case of thyroid disorders, including TCs, is problematic. These disorders are characterized by slow progression of variable, non-schematic symptoms or other indications, including earlier disorders in thyroid function, operations, radiotherapy of thyroid gland, diabetes, malignant anemia, megaloblastic anemia, leukotrichia, hereditary thyroid diseases, and adrenal insufficiency [6]. The implementation of drugs and agents containing lithium or iodine could also induce different metabolic changes. Thyroid cancers express alterations in some genes (a. o. BRAF, RAS, RET, TERT) probably associated with environmental factors [7,8]. Some of these mutations, an example being BRAFV600E (common in PTC), are shown to impair thyroid iodide-metabolizing genes [9]. Although the majority of genetic alterations related to TCs are codified (referring to somatic mutations), the etiology of TCs is still unknown [10]. Ionizing radiation is the only known environmental factor leading to gene mutations, inducing carcinogenesis. Recent scientific reports indicate the possible role of chemicals (phthalates, bisphenols) and heavy metals (cadmium, copper, and lead) in etiopathology of disorders of the thyroid gland [11]. The stromal changes in thyroid neoplasms may be associated with alterations in fibroblasts, endothelial cells, tumor-associated inflammatory cells, and numerous calcifications, known as ‘Psammom bodies’.
Although thyroid nodules are detected in 50% of healthy patients, only 5–15% of them are malignant [12]. Nevertheless, developing new differentiation and treatment strategies for TCs is of high importance, as its incidence has the highest impact on mortality among all of the endocrine cancers. The introduction of different screening methods, such as ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration (FNA), contributed to the lowering of the number of TC-associated thyroid operations. However, cytological assessment most often does not enable quick, preoperational diagnosis of each type of TC, since approximately 20–25% of biopsy results are classified as indeterminate (according to the Bethesda system), requiring surgical procedures before providing any further histological assessment [13]. Although only approximately 4% of thyroid nodules are carcinomas and require surgery, 15–30% of thyroid cytology results are not conclusive [14], possessing diagnostic and prognostic dilemmas [15]. This fact led to an uprising interest in thyroid cell oncogenesis [15,16] and the need for the discovery of many potentially promising blood-circulating biomarker candidates, most of them being thyroid-specific transcripts of thyroglobulin [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], thyroid stimulating hormone receptor [25,26], thyroid peroxidase [27,28], or sodium/iodide symporter [29,30]. However, the discrepancy between the studies into the usefulness of these mRNAs in screening for TCs (mainly in case of thyroglobulin mRNA) led to an increasing demand to come up with better prognostic markers.
Many studies aimed to describe the prognostic value of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) in the context of TCs. The idea to analyze these compounds stems from the fact that the increased risk of developing TCs is primarily associated with chronic hyperglycemia [31] which, through triggering lipid peroxidation, chronic inflammation, oxidative DNA modifications, and loss/gain of protein function (many of which have an antioxidative potential) [32,33,34], induces a release of carbonyl compounds and reactive oxygen species (ROS), promoting the process of glycation (thus—formation of AGEs). These glycation-derived compounds are characterized by slow elimination from the bloodstream, as virtually no enzymes were shown to catalyze reactions of their decomposition. Glycation of nucleic acids is associated with neoplastic changes, glycation of enzymes and lipoproteins, and alterations in metabolic pathways, while glycation of hormones disturbs signaling pathways, leading to abnormal transcriptional activity, aberrations in immune response, and oxidative stress intensification [35]. Protein glycation, along with protein aggregation, increases the risk of transformation of physiological cells into neoplastic due to changes in the function of proteins involved in cell metabolism. Both these processes are interrelated, as protein modifications which trigger protein aggregation may be induced by AGEs [36]. Moreover, AGE-associated modifications in the extracellular matrix promote its remodulation and/or dysfunction, increasing the risk of TCs. By binding to matrix proteins, AGEs cause an increase in matrix stiffness, which is shown to be correlated with tumor progression [37] and associated with alterations in response to tumor treatment [38] and activation of the receptor for glycation end-products (RAGE)—further intensifying inflammatory processes (and thus also promoting carcinogenesis). The mentioned changes in matrix stiffness due to glycation and/or oxidative damage may also be affected by genetic mutations/polymorphisms which also promote matrix remodulation. One of the most common (frequency of 29–83% [39,40,41]) mutations associated with PTCs, the BRAFV600E, increases the matrix stiffness due to phosphorylation of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2. This occurrence does not only promote PTC progression, but also triggers tumor cell migration and increases PTC aggressiveness. A knockdown of BRAFV600E, however, may alleviate this effect [42]. As mentioned before, this mutation also affects the thyroid iodide-metabolizing genes such as NIS, coding for sodium/iodide symporter. Interestingly, the effects of BRAFV600E have been ascribed to TGFβ mechanism of action. This information may be very vital in personalized anti-PTC treatment as it has been shown that targeting nitric oxide synthase 4 (one of TGFβ key effectors) with siRNA decreases BRAFV600E-induced repression of NIS [9]. The general outcome of PTCs may also be associated with aberrant methylation of genes engaged in TC progression. As shown by Kikuchi et al. [43], gene methylation in PTC may be correlated a priori with BRAF/RAS oncogene. Interestingly in thyroid glands, the aforementioned causative factor of glycation-chronic hyperglycemia is further promoted by oxidative damage, since malignant thyrocytes, especially poorly differentiated, were shown to overexpress insulin receptor [44]. Moreover, in TCs, as in breast cancer, the accumulation of AGEs and RAGE activation is connected with an increase in estrogen receptor expression on cell surface, having an effect on genesis, reprogramming, and progression of TCs [45].
The complex topic of the influence of AGEs on the development of TCs demands updating and thorough discussion, as the opportunity to understand this association has arisen lately with the results of new studies being published. This review covers the influence of RAGE, AGEs, AGE precursors, and ligands for RAGE on the progression of different TCs and discusses the use of these compounds in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

2. Advanced Glycation End-Products and Their Possible Linkage with Thyroid Cancers

2.1. The Glycation Process, Advanced Glycation End-Products, and Their Receptors

Glycation occurs spontaneously in a cascade of various non-enzymatic reactions (dehydration, oxidation, condensation, isomerization, cyclization) between amino groups of proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, and reducing carbohydrates or alpha-oxoaldehydes, leading to the formation of advanced glycation end-products. Glycation may affect the structure and function of many proteins and peptides, including enzymes (including enzymatic antioxidants) [46], hormones (including the thyroid hormone) [47], lipoproteins [48] and other transport-related proteins [49], signal transducers [50], and antibodies [51,52]. AGEs were first described 90 years ago [53]. However, many of them are still unknown [54].
Although glycation is known to be coexistent with physiological processes associated with aging [55], it is also intensified in metabolic disorders such as chronic hyperglycemia [56,57,58]. Many chronic diseases including cancer [59,60,61,62], neurodegenerative disorders [63,64], stroke [65], rheumatic [66,67] and cardiovascular [68,69] diseases and diabetes [70], with their implications, may occur through cellular dysfunction and AGE-induced inflammation [71]. AGEs increase the synthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS), escalating oxidative stress and increasing the probability of the occurrence of apoptosis (through protein modifications and lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in cellular membranes) [72], at the same time suppressing antioxidative mechanisms by inactivation of enzymatic antioxidants and alterations in antioxidative potential of non-enzymatic antioxidants (mainly, glutathione) [73,74]. The glycation process may also have beneficial effects in the body, as AGEs have been shown to inhibit osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells by activating DNA methylation and inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in vitro. Induction of DNA methylation allows regeneration of ASC bone tissue in diabetic osteoporosis [75].
Due to AGEs’ rather long half-time and association with oxidative or carbonyl stress, peroxidation of lipids, and formation of advanced lipoxidation end-products [76], AGEs are often considered as auxiliary markers in numerous diseases, proving to be of prognostic or even therapeutic value [77].
The receptors for AGEs are situated on the surface of cellular membranes. Interestingly, these receptors are involved in AGE-associated homeostasis, as some of them may not only exacerbate inflammation and oxidative stress, but also control the number of AGEs, preventing their accumulation. The most-studied AGEs receptors include [78]: RAGE, AGE-R1 (oligosaccharyl transferase-48, OST-48), AGE-R2 (80K-H phosphoprotein), AGE-R3 (galectin-3), SR-A (macrophage scavenger receptor A), SR-BI and SR-BII (two classes of scavenger receptor B, CD36), ERMs: ezrin, radixin, moesin [79], LOX-1 (lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor-1), and sRAGE (soluble RAGE) [80].
The most-studied AGEs receptor, RAGE, belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily [81]. RAGE is found on the surface of various cells and tissues, including pulmonary alveoli [82], monocytes/macrophages, endothelial, and dendritic cells [83]. It has been shown that RAGE does not only recognize AGEs (endogenous or food-derived), but also other compounds, e.g., advanced protein oxidation products (engaged in oxidative stress), fibrillar β-sheet forming amyloids characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease [84], S100 protein family members (Ca2+-binding modulators), and high mobility group box-1 (expressed in cancer) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. The influence of AGEs and other ligands for RAGE: amyloids, high mobility group box-1 proteins (HMGB), advanced protein oxidation products (AOPPs), S100 proteins on the cancer progression. The AGE-RAGE interaction induces various cascades associated with cell division and tumor formation. The mediators of these cascades include JAK/STAT chain; p21, PI3K kinase, regulators of signal transduction (Ras proteins), and NADPH oxidase. As a result of RAGE activation, numerous compounds are expressed within the cell nucleus and secreted into the bloodstream. These compounds include proinflammatory cytokines, interleukins and necrosis factors (tumor necrosis factor α, TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6), different extracellular matrix proteins (collagen or laminin), secondary signal transmitters, regulators of proliferation, differentiation, mitosis, cell survival, and apoptosis (Mitogen-activated protein kinase, MAPK, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, NF-κβ). As these compounds are accumulated, the cells are under the effect of intensified proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis-promoting cancer progression. Abbreviations: RAGE—Role of Advanced Glycation End-Products, AGEs—Advanced glycation end-products, PI3K—phosphoinositide 3-kinase, AKT—protein kinase B, NADPH—nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, MAPK—mitogen activated protein kinase, MEKK1—mitogen-activated kinase kinase 1, RAF—rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma, p53—tumor protein P53, STAT—signal transducer and activator of transcription, IRF-1—interferon regulatory factor 1, JAK—Janus kinases, ISRE—interferon stimulated response elements, RAS—regulators of signal transduction, ERK—extracellular signal-regulated kinases, ROS—reactive oxygen species, JNK—c-Jun N-terminal kinase, AP-1—activator protein 1, Nrf2—nuclear respiratory factor 2, GSH—glutathione, NF-κβ—nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, TGF-α—tumor growth factor alpha, MCP-1—monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, VEGF—vascular endothelial growth factor, ICAM-1—intercellular adhesion molecule 1, TGF-β—tumor growth factor beta, IL-1—interleukin 1, IL-6—interleukin 6.
AGE-RAGE interaction evokes constant and strong cellular response, inducing an intracellular cascade of inflammatory reactions which lead to release of proinflammatory cytokines [85], intensification of oxidative stress, increased risk of coagulopathies [86], overexpression of different extracellular matrix proteins (such as collagen or laminin) [87], and activation of secondary signal transmitters, e.g., kinase C. These processes promote alterations in cellular stimulation, migration, and proliferation, leading to pathological condition such as diabetic complications, sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, inflammation, and tumor development [88]. Most of these conditions are due to RAGE-associated release of intermediates of various cell signaling pathways, such as ROS, p21ras, erk1/2 (p44/p42), MAPK kinase [89] p38, SAPK/JNK MAP kinases, rhoGTPases, phosphoinositol-3 kinase, and intermediates of JAK/STAT pathway.
AGEs are considered to be potential markers of oxidative stress in several inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune thyroid disease [90]. Although little information is available on the role of this interaction in thyroid autoimmunity, it has been observed that AGEs concentration was elevated in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis (HT) [91].

2.2. AGEs, RAGE, and Possible Therapeutic Application of RAGE Antagonists in the State of Carcinogenesis

As mentioned before, especially in state of their massive accumulation, AGEs and other compounds (β-amyloid peptides, high mobility group box 1, some proteins of S100 family, β-sheet fibrils, prions and NFκβ) bind to RAGE, inducing changes within cell physiology via several pathways, including Ras-extracellular signal-regulating kinase 1/2 [92], p38 mitogen-activating protein kinase [93], JAK 1/2 [94], NADPH oxidase [95], and Cdc 42/Rac [96]. RAGE, upon being triggered by these compounds, triggers the activation of activator protein-1 [97], several other signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) [98], and, most importantly—NFκβ, being one of the key targets for RAGE signaling [99]. The NFκβ-associated, upregulated expression of cell adhesion molecules, growth factors (including TGFβ) and proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNFα), along with activation of NADPH oxidase and glycation of proteins of antioxidative capacity, promote the lack of pro-/antioxidative homeostasis and accumulation of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [100]. Therefore, a process of transient RAGE activation may shift into chronic state of inflammation due to RAGE activation through gradual increase in ROS/RNS, lesions within protein structure (and function), and positive feedback loop due to the ability of NFκβ to bind to RAGE.
Owing to these facts and the well-studied association of (meta-)inflammation with odds of tumor incidence [101], AGEs and RAGE have been (and are, still) studied as potential markers of carcinogenesis [102,103]. Increased expression of RAGE, induced by its ligands, was found to promote cancer metastasis; moreover, prevention from accumulation of AGEs and/or activation or RAGE inhibited metastasis of various tumors, including lung, breast, laryngeal, prostate, hepatocellular carcinomas, and melanoma, inter alia [104,105,106,107]. Targeting RAGE with RNAi or its modified, antagonistic ligands was shown to inhibit tumor growth and invasion [108,109,110]. Moreover, as RAGE promotes angiogenesis (via affecting the expression of VEGF and other factors), silencing the signal derived from RAGE activation was associated with inhibition of angiogenesis induced by colorectal carcinoma, both in vitro and in vivo [111,112,113]. Interestingly, some of the widely-applied drugs might be able to affect RAGE activation, since statins were shown to be able to downregulate RAGE, inducing decrease in VEGF [114].

4. Conclusions

Thyroid cancers (TCs), including papillary (PTC), follicular (FTC), poorly differentiated (PDTC), medullary (MTC), anaplastic (ATC), their mixes, and other rarely appearing TCs, form complicated tumors. These cancers pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
AGEs, precursors of AGEs, RAGE, and RAGE ligands not being AGEs are all engaged in TCs carcinogenesis, playing different roles during its various stages. Inflammation–related processes such as oxidative, carbonyl, and nitrosative stress promote protein (enzymes, histones, and other structural proteins, such as collagen), DNA, and lipid glycation, which leads to structural changes, altering the biological function of these compounds and promoting mutations of genes associated with the incidence of TCs. The interaction of one of AGEs precursors, the methylglyoxal, with DNA, may further promote mutations and cell cycle disorders.
It is important to note that the deleterious impact of glycation on cell physiology stems not only from various RAGE-associated interactions within thyroid cells, but also from these interactions taking part within the cell microenvironment: AGE–RAGE interaction enhances the synthesis of ERK, PI3K, RAC, and cyclin D, which disrupts the cell cycle. HMGB1 promotes the incidence of ATC and PTC through increasing the expression of uncoding molecules of miRNA, which play a role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and metastasis. S100A4 is engaged in proliferation and metastasis of thyroid cancers (follicular, papillary, and anaplastic) because it promotes tumor cell migration. Moreover, the RAGE/Dia1/small GTPases interaction may successfully reduce local invasion and metastasis. S100A8–RAGE interaction activates p38, ERK, and JNK pathways in tumor cells.
RAGE, its ligands, and compounds engaged in glycation may be investigated as potential aims of TC treatment, as some of them have been shown to affect thyroid cancer aggressiveness. The increase in methylglyoxal concentration, often observed in ATC, may be lowered by treatment with aminoguanidine and resveratrol. Anti–RAGE antibodies, however, were shown to effectively decrease the concentration of miR221 and miR222 (increased in thyroid cancer). Moreover, the inhibition of S100A8 proglycative function of S100A8 was proposed to be an appropriate therapeutic target in patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer.
Although, in the context of thyroid cancer, the amount of evidence against glycation and its related processes is scarce, it shows that the impact of glycation on different aspects of thyroid cell life and death, albeit complex and demanding laborious trials of success and error, may evolve into clinically relevant strategies for thyroid cancer treatment, aiming to control the outcome of tumor disease and the related alterations in the quality of life.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10184084/s1, Table S1: The etiology, characteristics, progression, diagnosis and treatment of thyroid cancers: PTC, FTC, ATC, PDTC, MTC, PTL, PTS and STCT.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.-S. and I.K.-W.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.-S. and Ł.K.; writing—review and editing, A.B.-S., I.K.-W. and Ł.L.; visualization, A.B.-S.; supervision, I.K.-W. and A.G.; project administration, A.B.-S. and Ł.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chmielik, E.; Rusinek, D.; Oczko-Wojciechowska, M.; Jarzab, M.; Krajewska, J.; Czarniecka, A.; Jarzab, B. Heterogeneity of thyroid cancer. Pathobiology 2018, 85, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, J.C.; Gundara, J.S.; Glover, A.; Serpell, J.; Sidhu, S.B. MicroRNA Expression Profiles in the management of papillary thyroid cancer. Oncologist 2014, 19, 1141–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, H.; Devesa, S.S.; Sosa, J.A.; Check, D.; Kitahara, C.M. Trends in thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in the United States, 1974–2013. JAMA 2017, 317, 1338–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kakudo, K.; Bychkov, A.; Bai, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jung, C.K. The new 4th edition World Health Organization classification for thyroid tumors, Asian perspectives. Pathol. Int. 2018, 68, 641–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ge, M.H.; Cao, J.; Wang, J.Y.; Huang, Y.Q.; Lan, X.B.; Yu, B.; Wen, Q.L.; Cai, X.J. Nomograms predicting disease-specific regional recurrence and distant recurrence of papillary thyroid carcinoma following partial or total thyroidectomy. Medicine 2017, 96, e7575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Silverstein, M. Screening for high blood pressure in children and adolescents: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Am. Fam. Physician 2021, 103, 239A–239D, Online. [Google Scholar]
  7. Clarke, C.A.; Reynolds, P.; Oakley-Girvan, I.; Lee, E.; Lu, Y.; Yang, J.; Moy, L.M.; Bernstein, L.; Horn-Ross, P.L. Indicators of microbial-rich environments and the development of papillary thyroid cancer in the California Teachers Study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015, 39, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Frantz, C.; Stewart, K.M.; Weaver, V.M. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123 Pt 24, 4195–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Azouzi, N.; Cailloux, J.; Cazarin, J.M.; Knauf, J.A.; Cracchiolo, J.; Ghuzian, A.A.; Hartl, D.; Polak, M.; Carre, A.; Mzibir, M.E.; et al. NADPH Oxidase NOX4 is a critical mediator of BRAFV600E-induced downregulation of the sodium/iodide symporter in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 26, 864–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marotta, V.; Sciammarella, C.; Colao, A.; Faggiano, A. Application of molecular biology of differentiated thyroid cancer for clinical prognostication. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2016, 23, R499–R515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Marotta, V.; Malandrino, P.; Russo, M.; Panariello, I.; Ionna, F.; Chiofalo, M.G.; Pezzullo, L. Fathoming the link between anthropogenic chemical contamination and thyroid cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2020, 150, 102950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cooper, D.S.; Doherty, G.M.; Haugen, B.R.; Kloos, R.T.; Lee, S.L.; Mandel, S.J.; Mazzaferri, E.L.; McIver, B.; Pacini, F.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009, 19, 1167–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Patel, S.G.; Carty, S.E.; McCoy, K.L.; Ohori, N.P.; LeBeau, S.O.; Seethala, R.R.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Yip, L. Preoperative detection of RAS mutation may guide extent of thyroidectomy. Surgery 2017, 161, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Castro, M.R.; Gharib, H. Continuing controversies in the management of thyroid nodules. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005, 142, 926–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guerra, A.; Di Stasi, V.; Zeppa, P.; Faggiano, A.; Marotta, V.; Vitale, M. BRAF(V600E) assessment by pyrosequencing in fine needle aspirates of thyroid nodules with concurrent Hashimoto’s thyroiditis is a reliable assay. Endocrine 2014, 45, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marotta, V.; Bifulco, M.; Vitale, M. Significance of RAS mutations in thyroid benign nodules and non-medullary thyroid cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gupta, M.; Chia, S.Y. Circulating thyroid cancer markers. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2007, 14, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tallini, G.; Ghossein, R.A.; Emanuel, J.; Gill, J.; Kinder, B.; Dimich, A.B.; Costa, J.; Robbins, R.; Burrow, G.N.; Rosai, J. Detection of thyroglobulin, thyroid peroxidase, and RET/PTC1 mRNA transcripts in the peripheral blood of patients with thyroid disease. J. Clin. Oncol. 1998, 16, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ditkoff, B.A.; Marvin, M.R.; Yemul, S.; Shi, Y.J.; Chabot, J.; Feind, C.; Lo Gerfo, P.; Clark, O.H.; McHenry, C.R. Detection of circulating thyroid cells in peripheral blood. Surgery 1996, 120, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Span, P.N.; Sleegers, M.J.M.; Van den Broek, W.J.; Ross, H.A.; Nieuwlaat, W.A.; Hermus, A.R.M.M.; Sweep, C.G.J. Quantitative detection of peripheral thyroglobulin mRNA has limited clinical value in the follow-up of thyroid cancer patients. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2003, 40, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bugalho, M.J.; Domingues, R.S.; Pinto, A.C.; Garrão, A.; Catarino, A.L.; Ferreira, T.; Limbert, E.; Sobrinho, L. Detection of thyroglobulin mRNA transcripts in peripheral blood of individuals with and without thyroid glands: Evidence for thyroglobulin expression by blood cells. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 145, 409–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bojunga, J.; Röddiger, S.; Stanisch, M.; Kusterer, K.; Kurek, R.; Renneberg, H.; Adams, S.; Lindhorst, E.; Usadel, K.H.; Schumm-Draeger, P.M. Molecular detection of thyroglobulin mRNA transcripts in peripheral blood of patients with thyroid disease by RT-PCR. Br. J. Cancer 2000, 82, 1650–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fugazzola, L.; Mihalich, A.; Persani, L.; Cerutti, N.; Reina, M.; Bonomi, M.; Ponti, E.; Mannavola, D.; Giammona, E.; Vannucchi, G.; et al. Highly sensitive serum thyroglobulin and circulating thyroglobulin mRNA evaluations in the management of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer in apparent remission. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 3201–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  24. Grammatopoulos, D.; Elliott, Y.; Smith, S.C.; Brown, I.; Grieve, R.J.; Hillhouse, E.W.; Levine, M.A.; Ringel, M.D. Measurement of thyroglobulin mRNA in peripheral blood as an adjunctive test for monitoring thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Pathol. Mol. Pathol. 2003, 56, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  25. Wagner, K.; Arciaga, R.; Siperstein, A.; Milas, M.; Warshawsky, I.; Reddy, S.S.K.; Gupta, M.K. Rapid communication: Thyrotropin receptor/thyroglobulin messenger ribonucleic acid in peripheral blood and fine-needle aspiration cytology: Diagnostic synergy for detecting thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 1921–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  26. Milas, M.; Mazzaglia, P.; Chia, S.Y.; Skugor, M.; Berber, E.; Reddy, S.; Gupta, M.; Siperstein, A. The utility of peripheral thyrotropin mRNA in the diagnosis of follicular neoplasms and surveillance of thyroid cancers. Surgery 2007, 141, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Barzon, L.; Boscaro, M.; Pacenti, M.; Taccaliti, A.; Palù, G. Evaluation of circulating thyroid-specific transcripts as markers of thyroid cancer relapse. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 110, 914–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roddiger, S.J.; Bojunga, J.; Klee, V.; Stanisch, M.; Renneberg, H.; Lindhorst, E.; Usadel, K.H.; Kusterer, K.; Schumm-Draeger, P.M.; Kurek, R. Detection of thyroid peroxidase mRNA in peripheral blood of patients with malignant and benign thyroid diseases. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002, 29, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saito, T.; Endo, T.; Kawaguchi, A.; Ikeda, M.; Katoh, R.; Kawaoi, A.; Muramatsu, A.; Onaya, T. Increased expression of the sodium/iodide symporter in papillary thyroid carcinomas. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 1296–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Russo, A.F.; Giuffrida, D.; Schlumberger, M.; Filetti, S. Sodium-iodide symporter (NIS) gene expression in lymph-node metastases of papillary thyroid carcinomas. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2000, 143, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Beer, J.C.; Liebenberg, L. Does cancer risk increase with HbA1c, independent of diabetes? Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 2361–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yan, L.J. Pathogenesis of chronic hyperglycemia: From reductive stress to oxidative stress. J. Diabetes Res. 2014, 2014, 137919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kawahito, S.; Kitahata, H.; Oshita, S. Problems associated with glucose toxicity: Role of hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress. World J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 15, 4137–4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Choudhuri, S.; Dutta, D.; Chowdhury, I.H.; Mitra, B.; Sen, A.; Mandal, L.K.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Bhattacharya, B. Association of hyperglycemia mediated increased advanced glycation and erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activity in different stages of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013, 100, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ravichandran, G.; Lakshmanan, D.K.; Raju, K.; Elangovan, A.; Nambirajan, G.; Devanesan, A.A.; Thilagar, S. Food advanced glycation end products as potential endocrine disruptors: An emerging threat to contemporary and future generation. Environ. Int. 2019, 123, 486–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Haque, E.; Kamil, M.; Hasan, A.; Irfan, S.; Sheikh, S.; Khatoon, A.; Nazir, A.; Mir, S.S. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs), protein aggregation and their cross talk: New insight in tumorigenesis. Glycobiology 2019, 30, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wirtz, D.; Konstantopoulos, K.; Searson, P.C. The physics of cancer: The role of physical interactions and mechanical forces in metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McCreery, M.Q.; Balmain, A. Chemical carcinogenesis models of cancer: Back to the future. Annu. Rev. Cancer Biol. 2017, 1, 295–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xing, M. BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2005, 12, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Riesco-Eizaguirre, G.; Santisteban, P. New insights in thyroid follicular cell biology and its impact in thyroid cancer therapy. Endocr.-Relat. Cancer 2007, 14, 957–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ricarte-Filho, J.C.; Ryder, M.; Chitale, D.A.; Rivera, M.; Heguy, A.; Ladanyi, M.; Janakiraman, M.; Solit, D.; Knauf, J.A.; Tuttle, R.M.; et al. Mutational profile of advanced primary and metastatic radioactive iodine-refractory thyroid cancers reveals distinct pathogenetic roles for BRAF, PIK3CA, and AKT1. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 4885–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nucera, C.; Lawler, J.; Hodin, R.; Parangi, S. The BRAFV600E mutation: What is it really orchestrating in thyroid cancer? Oncotarget 2010, 1, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kikuchi, Y.; Tsuij, E.; Yagi, K.; Matsusaka, K.; Tsuji, S.; Kurebayashi, J.; Ogawa, T.; Aburatani, H.; Kaneda, A. Aberrantly methylated genes in human papillary thyroid cancer and their association with BRAF/RAS mutation. Front. Gen. 2013, 4, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vella, V.; Pandini, G.; Sciacca, L.; Mineo, R.; Vigneri, R.; Pezzino, V.; Belfiore, A. A novel autocrine loop involving IGF-II and the insulin receptor isoform-A stimulates growth of thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boelaert, K. Thyroid gland: Revised guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2010, 6, 185–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Morgan, P.E.; Dean, R.T.; Davies, M.J. Inactivation of cellular enzymes by carbonyls and protein-bound glycation/glycoxidation products. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2002, 403, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kandaraki, E.A.; Chatzigeorgiou, A.; Papageorgiou, E.; Piperi, C.; Adamopoulos, C.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; Koutsilieris, M.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E. Advanced glycation end products interfere in luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone signaling in human granulosa KGN cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2018, 243, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hedrick, C.C.; Thorpe, S.R.; Fu, M.X.; Harper, C.M.; Yoo, J.; Kim, S.M.; Wong, H.; Peters, A.L. Glycation impairs high-density lipoprotein function. Diabetologia 2000, 43, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rondeau, P.; Bourdon, E. The glycation of albumin: Structural and functional impacts. Biochimie 2011, 93, 645–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shekhtman, A.; Ramasamy, R.; Schmidt, A.M. Glycation & the RAGE axis: Targeting signal transduction through DIAPH1. Expert Rev. Proteom. 2017, 14, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, B.; Berning, K.; Quan, C.; Zhang, Y.T. Glycation of antibodies: Modification, methods and potential effects on biological functions. MAbs 2017, 9, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gstöttner, C.; Reusch, D.; Haberger, M.; Dragan, I.; Van Veelen, P.; Kilgour, D.P.A.; Tsybin, Y.O.; van der Burgt, Y.E.M.; Wuhrer, M.; Nicolardi, S. Monitoring glycation levels of a bispecific monoclonal antibody at subunit level by ultrahigh-resolution MALDI FT-ICR mass spectrometry. MAbs 2020, 12, 1682403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Murata, M. Browning and pigmentation in food through the Maillard reaction. Glycoconj. J. 2020, 38, 283–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Staniszewska, M.; Bronowicka-Szydełko, A.; Gostomska-Pampuch, K.; Szkudlarek, J.; Bartyś, A.; Bieg, T.; Gamian, E.; Kochman, A.; Picur, B.; Pietkiewicz, J.; et al. The melibiose-derived glycation product mimics a unique epitope present in human and animal tissues. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Baynes, J.W. The role of AGEs in aging: Causation or correlation. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 1527–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Negre-Salvayre, A.; Salvayre, R.; Augé, N.; Pamplona, R.; Portero-Otín, M. Hyperglycemia and glycation in diabetic complications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 3071–3109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Palanissami, G.; Paul, S.F.D. RAGE and its ligands: Molecular interplay between glycation, inflammation, and hallmarks of cancer—A review. Horm. Cancer 2018, 9, 295–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zahng, W.; Randell, E.W.; Sun, G.; Likhodii, S.; Liu, M.; Furey, A.; Zhai, G. Hyperglycemia-related advanced glycation end-products is associated with the altered phosphatidylcholine metabolism in osteoarthritis patients with diabetes. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saheem, A.; Mohd, Y.K.; Zeeshan, R.; Hamda, K.; Zeba, S.; Shahnawaz, R.; Uzma, S.; Mohd, S.K.; Saeed, M.; Sultan, A.; et al. Oxidation, glycation and glycoxidation-The vicious cycle and lung cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 49, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Menini, S.; Iacobini, C.; de Latouliere, L.; Manni, I.; Ionta, V.; Blasetti Fantauzzi, C.; Pesce, C.; Cappello, P.; Novelli, F.; Piaggio, G.; et al. The advanced glycation end-product Nϵ-carboxymethyllysine promotes progression of pancreatic cancer: Implications for diabetes-associated risk and its prevention. J. Pathol. 2018, 245, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Konopka, C.J.; Woźniak, M.; Hedhli, J.; Siekierzycka, A.; Skokowski, J.; Pęksa, R.; Matuszewski, M.; Munirathinam, G.; Kajdacsy-Balla, A.; Dobrucki, I.T.; et al. Quantitative imaging of the receptor for advanced glycation end-products in prostate cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 2562–2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharma, A.K.; Sharma, V.R.; Gupta, G.K.; Ashraf, G.M.; Kamal, M.A. Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs), Glutathione and Breast Cancer: Factors, Mechanism and Therapeutic Interventions. Curr. Drug Metab. 2019, 20, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Derk, J.; MacLean, M.; Juranek, J.; Schmidt, A.M. The Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts (RAGE) and Mediation of Inflammatory Neurodegeneration. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Park. 2018, 8, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Muronetz, V.I.; Melnikova, A.K.; Seferbekova, Z.N.; Barinova, K.V.; Schmalhausen, E.V. Glycation, glycolysis, and neurodegenerative diseases: Is there any connection? Biochemistry 2017, 82, 874–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kitzmiller, J.L.; Ferrara, A.; Peng, T.; Cissell, M.A.; Kim, C.; Cowie, C.C.; Casagrande, S.S.; Menke, A.; Cissell, M.A.; Eberhardt, M.S.; et al. Association of RAGE with acute ischemic stroke prognosis in type 2 diabetes. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 190, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nakhjavani, M.R.J.; Jafarpour, M.; Ghorbanihaghjo, A.; Azar, S.A.; Mahdavi, A.M. Relationship between serum-soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Mod. Rheumatol. 2019, 29, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Li, Y.; Khan, M.S.; Akhter, F.; Husain, F.M.; Ahmad, S.; Chen, L. The non-enzymatic glycation of LDL proteins results in biochemical alterations—A correlation study of Apo B 100-AGE with obesity and rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Egaña-Gorroño, L.; López-Díez, R.; Yepuri, G.; Ramirez, L.S.; Reverdatto, S.; Gugger, P.F.; Shekhtman, A.; Ramasamy, R.; Schmidt, A.M. Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities in diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Insights from human subjects and animal models. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, P.; Feng, J.; Peng, Q.; Liu, X.; Fan, Z. Advanced glycation end products: Potential mechanism and therapeutic target in cardiovascular complications under diabetes. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 9570616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kashyap, S.R.; Osme, A.; Ilchenko, S.; Golizeh, M.; Lee, K.; Wang, S.; Bena, J.; Previs, S.F.; Smith, J.D.; Kasumov, T. Glycation reduces the stability of apoai and increases HDL dysfunction in diet-controlled type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nedić, O.; Rattan, S.I.S.; Grune, T.; Trougakos, I.P. Molecular effects of advanced glycation end products on cell signalling pathways, ageing and pathophysiology. Free Radic. Res. 2013, 47, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lan, K.C.; Chiu, C.Y.; Kao, C.W.; Huang, K.H.; Wang, C.C.; Huang, K.T.; Tsai, K.S.; Sheu, M.L.; Liu, S.H. Advanced glycation end-products induce apoptosis in pancreatic islet endothelial cells via NF-κB-activated cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin e2 up-regulation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yang, Q.; Wu, S.; Mao, X.; Wang, W.; Tai, H. Inhibition effect of curcumin on TNF-α and MMP-13 expression induced by advanced glycation end products in chondrocytes. Pharmacology 2013, 91, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Polykretis, P.; Luchinat, E.; Boscaro, F.; Banci, L. Methylglyoxal interaction with superoxide dismutase 1. Redox Biol. 2020, 30, 01421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Huang, K.; Yao, Z.; Rao, P.; Cai, X.; Xiao, J. Advanced glycation end products inhibit the osteogenic differentiation potential of adipose-derived stem cells by modulating Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway via DNA methylation. Cell Prolif. 2020, 53, e12834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sell, D.R.; Monnier, V.M. Molecular basis of arterial stiffening: Role of glycation-a mini-review. Gerontology 2012, 58, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dhama, K.; Latheef, S.K.; Dadar, M.; Samad, H.A.; Munjal, A.; Khandia, R.; Karthik, K.; Tiwari, R.; Yatoo, M.I.; Bhatt, P.; et al. Biomarkers in stress related diseases/disorders: Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic values. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2019, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Goldin, A.; Beckman, J.A.; Schmidt, A.M.; Creager, M.A. Advanced glycation end products: Sparking the development of diabetic vascular injury. Circulation 2006, 114, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. McRobert, A.E.; Gallicchio, M.; Jerums, G.; Cooper, M.E.; Bach, L.A. The amino-terminal domains of the ezrin, radixin, and moesin (ERM) proteins bind advanced glycation end products, an interaction that may play a role in the development of diabetic complications. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25783–25789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bierhaus, A.; Humpert, P.M.; Morcos, M.; Wendt, T.; Chavakis, T.; Arnold, B.; Stern, D.M.; Nawroth, P.P. Understanding RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products. J. Mol. Med. 2005, 83, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fournet, M.; Bonté, F.; Desmoulière, A. Glycation damage: A possible hub for major pathophysiological disorders and aging. Aging Dis. 2018, 9, 880–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Oczypok, E.A.; Perkins, T.N.; Oury, T.D. All the “RAGE” in lung disease: The receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE) is a major mediator of pulmonary inflammatory responses. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2017, 23, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Teodorowicz, M.; Hendriks, W.H.; Wichers, H.J.; Savelkoul, H.F.J. Immunomodulation by processed animal feed: The role of maillard reaction products and advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Prasad, K. Is there any evidence that AGE/sRAGE is a universal biomarker/risk marker for diseases? Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 451, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Gawlowski, T.; Stratmann, B.; Ruetter, R.; Buenting, C.E.; Menart, B.; Weiss, J.; Vlassara, H.; Koschinsky, T.; Tschoepe, D. Advanced glycation end products strongly activate platelets. Eur. J. Nutr. 2009, 48, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. de Laat, M.A.; Kyaw-Tanner, M.T.; Sillence, M.N.; McGowan, C.M.; Pollitt, C.C. Advanced glycation end-products in horses with insulin-induced laminitis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 145, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  87. Sick, E.; Brehin, S.; André, P.; Coupin, G.; Landry, Y.; Takeda, K.; Gies, J.P. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) activate mast cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 161, 442–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Heidari, F.; Rabizadeh, S.; Ali Mansournia, M.; Mirmiranpoor, H.; Salehi, S.S.; Akhavan, S.; Esteghamati, A.; Nakhjavani, M. Inflammatory, oxidative stress and anti-oxidative markers in patients with endometrial carcinoma and diabetes. Cytokine 2019, 120, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mollace, M.; Coluccio, M.L.; Donato, G.; Mollace, V.; Malara, N. Cross-talks in colon cancer between RAGE/AGEs axis and inflammation/immunotherapy. Oncotarget 2021, 12, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 313. [CrossRef]
  91. Ruggeri, R.M.; Barbalace, M.C.; Cristani, M.T.; Alibrandi, A.; Giovinazzo, S.; Giuffrida, G.; Trimarchi, F.; Cannavò, S.; Campennì, A. Serum levels of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are increased and their soluble receptor (sRAGE) reduced in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2020, 43, 1337–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ishihara, K.; Tsutsumi, K.; Kawane, S.; Nakajima, M.; Kasaoka, T. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) directly binds to ERK by a D-domain-like docking site. FEBS Lett. 2003, 550, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Origlia, N.; Righi, M.; Capsoni, S.; Cattaneo, A.; Fang, F.; Stern, D.M.; Chen, J.C.; Schmidt, A.M.; Arancio, O.; Yan, S.D.; et al. Receptor for advanced glycation end product-dependent activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase contributes to amyloid-beta-mediated cortical synaptic dysfunction. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 3521–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Grimm, S.; Ott, C.; Hörlacher, M.; Weber, D.; Höhn, A.; Grune, T. Advanced-glycation-end-product-induced formation of immunoproteasomes: Involvement of RAGE and Jak2/STAT1. Biochem. J. 2012, 448, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wautier, M.P.; Chappey, O.; Corda, S.; Stern, D.M.; Schmidt, A.M.; Wautier, J.L. Activation of NADPH oxidase by AGE links oxidant stress to altered gene expression via RAGE. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 280, E685–E694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hudson, B.I.; Kalea, A.Z.; Del Mar Arriero, M.; Harja, E.; Boulanger, E.; D’Agati, V.; Schmidt, A.M. Interaction of the RAGE cytoplasmic domain with diaphanous-1 is required for ligand-stimulated cellular migration through activation of Rac1 and Cdc42. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 34457–34468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Rojas, A.; Delgado-López, F.; González, I.; Pérez-Castro, R.; Romero, J.; Rojas, I. The receptor for advanced glycation end-products: A complex signaling scenario for a promiscuous receptor. Cell. Signal. 2013, 25, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Huang, J.S.; Guh, J.Y.; Hung, W.C.; Yang, M.L.; Lai, Y.H.; Chen, H.C.; Chuang, L.Y. Role of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducters and activators of transcription (STAT) cascade in advanced glycation end-product-induced cellular mitogenesis in NRK-49F cells. Biochem. J. 1999, 342, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wautier, J.L.; Wautier, M.P.; Schmidt, A.M.; Anderson, G.M.; Hori, O.; Zoukourian, C.; Capron, L.; Chappey, O.; Yan, S.D.; Brett, J. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) on the surface of diabetic erythrocytes bind to the vessel wall via a specific receptor inducing oxidant stress in the vasculature: A link between surface-associated AGEs and diabetic complications. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 7742–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Qian, Q.Q.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.W.; Xu, J.W.; Dong, H.Q.; Li, N.N.; Qian, Y.N.; Gui, B. Pro-inflammatory role of high-mobility group box-1 on brain mast cells via the RAGE/NF-κB pathway. J. Neurochem. 2019, 151, 595–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ritter, B.; Greten, F.R. Modulating inflammation for cancer therapy. J. Exp. Med. 2019, 216, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ahmad, S.; Khan, H.; Siddiqui, Z.; Khan, M.Y.; Rehman, S.; Shahab, U.; Godovikova, T.; Silnikov, V.; Moinuddin. AGEs, RAGEs and s-RAGE; friend or foe for cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 49, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Deng, R.; Mo, F.; Chang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Ran, H.; Yang, S.; Zhu, Z.; Hu, L.; Su, Q. Glucose-derived AGEs enhance human gastric cancer metastasis through RAGE/ERK/Sp1/MMP2 cascade. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 104216–104226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kolonin, M.G.; Sergeeva, A.; Staquicini, D.I.; Smith, T.L.; Tarleton, C.A.; Molldrem, J.J.; Sidman, R.L.; Marchiò, S.; Pasqualini, R.; Arap, W. Interaction between Tumor Cell Surface Receptor RAGE and Proteinase 3 Mediates Prostate Cancer Metastasis to Bone. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 3144–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Chen, M.C.; Chen, K.C.; Chang, G.C.; Lin, H.; Wu, C.C.; Kao, W.H.; Teng, C.L.J.; Hsu, S.L.; Yang, T.Y. RAGE acts as an oncogenic role and promotes the metastasis of human lung cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020, 11, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kwak, T.; Drews-Elger, K.; Ergonul, A.; Miller, P.C.; Braley, A.; Hwang, G.H.; Zhao, D.; Besser, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yamamoto, H.; et al. Targeting of RAGE-ligand signaling impairs breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1559–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ohgami, N.; Nagai, R.; Miyazaki, A.; Ikemoto, M.; Arai, H.; Horiuchi, S.; Nakayama, H. Scavenger receptor class B type I-mediated reverse cholesterol transport is inhibited by advanced glycation end products. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 13348–13355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Arumugam, T.; Ramachandran, V.; Gomez, S.B.; Schmidt, A.M.; Logsdon, C.D. S100P-derived RAGE antagonistic peptide reduces tumor growth and metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 4356–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Elangovan, I.; Thirugnanam, S.; Chen, A.; Zheng, G.; Bosland, M.C.; Kajdacsy-Balla, A.; Gnanasekar, M. Targeting receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) expression induces apoptosis and inhibits prostate tumor growth. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 417, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jandial, R.; Neman, J.; Lim, P.P.; Tamae, D.; Kowolik, C.M.; Wuenschell, G.E.; Shuck, S.C.; Ciminera, A.K.; De Jesus, L.R.; Ouyang, C.; et al. Inhibition of GLO1 in glioblastoma multiforme increases DNA-AGEs, stimulates RAGE expression, and inhibits brain tumor growth in orthotopic mouse models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, I.Y.; Liang, J.B. RAGE expression in tumor-associated macrophages promotes angiogenesis in glioma. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 7285–7297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Takino, J.; Yamagishi, S.; Takeuchi, M. Glycer-AGEs-RAGE signaling enhances the angiogenic potential of hepatocellular carcinoma by upregulating VEGF expression. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 1781–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, M.; Glenn, J.V.; Dasari, S.; McVicar, C.; Ward, M.; Colhoun, L.; Quinn, M.; Bierhaus, A.; Xu, H.; Stitt, A.W. RAGE regulates immune cell infiltration and angiogenesis in choroidal neovascularization. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nakamura, N.; Matsui, T.; Ishibashi, Y.; Sotokawauchi, A.; Fukami, K.; Higashimoto, Y.; Yamagishi, S.I. RAGE-aptamer Attenuates the Growth and Liver Metastasis of Malignant Melanoma in Nude Mice. Mol. Med. 2017, 23, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Gianì, F.; Vella, V.; Tumino, D.; Malandrino, P.; Frasca, F. The possible role of cancer stem cells in the resistance to kinase inhibitors of advanced thyroid cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Takano, T. Fetal cell carcinogenesis of the thyroid: A modified theory based on recent evidence. Endocr. J. 2014, 61, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Gerashchenko, T.S.; Denisov, E.V.; Litviakov, N.V.; Zavyalova, M.V.; Vtorushin, S.V.; Tsyganov, M.M.; Perelmuter, V.M.; Cherdyntseva, N.V. Intratumor heterogeneity: Nature and biological significance. Biochemistry 2013, 78, 1201–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Semenza, G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors: Mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 33, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Rojas, A.; Figueroa, H.; Morales, E. Fueling inflammation at tumor microenvironment: The role of multiligand/rage axis. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 334–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Coluccio, M.L.; Presta, I.; Greco, M.; Gervasi, R.; La Torre, D.; Renne, M.; Voci, C.P.; Lunelli, L.; Donato, G.; Malara, N. Microenvironment molecular profile combining glycation adducts and cytokines patterns on secretome of short-term blood-derived cultures during tumour progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zheng, J.; Lu, W.; Wang, C.; Xing, Y.; Chen, X.; Ail, Z. Galectin-3 induced by hypoxia promotes cell migration in thyroid cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 101475–101488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Yao, D.; Brownlee, M. Hyperglycemia-induced reactive oxygen species increase expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and RAGE ligands. Diabetes 2010, 59, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chiavarina, B.; Nokin, M.J.; Bellier, J.; Durieux, F.; Bletard, N.; Sherer, F.; Lovinfosse, P.; Peulen, O.; Verset, L.; Dehon, R.; et al. Methylglyoxal-mediated stress correlates with high metabolic activity and promotes tumor growth in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Chondrogianni, N.; Gonos, E.S. Proteasome inhibition induces a senescence-like phenotype in primary human fibroblasts cultures. Biogerontology 2004, 5, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kuzan, A.; Królewicz, E.; Nowakowska, K.; Stach, K.; Kaliszewki, K.; Domasławski, P.; Kotyra, Ł.; Gamian, A.; Kustrzeba-Wójcicka, I. Contribution of glycation and oxidative stress to thyroid gland pathology—A pilot study. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Włodarczyk, M.; Nowicka, G. Obesity, DNA damage, and development of obesity-related diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Schalkwijk, C.G.; Van Bezu, J.; Van Der Schors, R.C.; Uchida, K.; Stehouwer, C.D.A.; Van Hinsbergh, V.W.M. Heat-shock protein 27 is a major methylglyoxal-modified protein in endothelial cells. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Tatone, C.; Heizenrieder, T.; Di Emidio, G.; Treffon, P.; Amicarelli, F.; Seidel, T.; Eichenlaub-Ritter, U. Evidence that carbonyl stress by methylglyoxal exposure induces DNA damage and spindle aberrations, affects mitochondrial integrity in mammalian oocytes and contributes to oocyte ageing. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 1843–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rodrigues, R.F.; Roque, L.; Krug, T.; Leite, V. Poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas: Chromosomal and oligo-array profile of five new cell lines. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 96, 1237–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Fruman, D.A.; Chiu, H.; Hopkins, B.D.; Bagrodia, S.; Cantley, L.C.; Abraham, R.T. The PI3K Pathway in Human Disease. Cell 2017, 170, 605–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Russo, D.; Durante, C.; Bulotta, S.; Puppin, C.; Puxeddu, E.; Filetti, S.; Damante, G. Targeting histone deacetylase in thyroid cancer. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ashraf, J.M.; Rabbani, G.; Ahmad, S.; Hasan, Q.; Khan, R.H.; Alam, K.; Choi, I.C. Glycation of H1 histone by 3-deoxyglucosone: Effects on protein structure and generation of different advanced glycation end products. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zheng, Q.; Omans, N.D.; Leicher, R.; Osunsade, A.; Agustinus, A.S.; Finkin-Groner, E.; D’Ambrosio, H.; Liu, B.; Chandarlapaty, S.; Liu, S.; et al. Reversible histone glycation is associated with disease-related changes in chromatin architecture. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Marsman, G.; Zeerleder, S.; Luken, B.M. Extracellular histones, cell-free DNA, or nucleosomes: Differences in immunostimulation. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Chambard, J.C.; Lefloch, R.; Pouysségur, J.; Lenormand, P. ERK implication in cell cycle regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1773, 1299–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yashima, H.; Terasaki, M.; Sotokawauchi, A.; Matsui, T.; Mori, Y.; Saito, T.; Osaka, N.; Kushima, H.; Hiromura, M.; Ohara, M.; et al. Age-rage axis stimulates oxidized LDL uptake into macrophages through cyclin-dependent kinase 5-cd36 pathway via oxidative stress generation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Todaro, M.; Iovino, F.; Eterno, V.; Cammareri, P.; Gambara, G.; Espina, V.; Gulotta, G.; Dieli, F.; Giordano, S.; De Maria, R.; et al. Tumorigenic and metastatic activity of human thyroid cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 8874–8885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Fleming, T.; Cuny, J.; Nawroth, G.; Djuric, Z.; Humpert, P.M.; Zeier, M.; Bierhaus, A.; Nawroth, P.P. Is diabetes an acquired disorder of reactive glucose metabolites and their intermediates? Diabetologia 2012, 55, 1151–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bansode, S.B.; Chougale, A.D.; Joshi, R.S.; Giri, A.P.; Bodhankar, S.L.; Harsulkar, A.M.; Kulkarni, M.J. Proteomic analysis of protease resistant proteins in the diabetic rat kidney. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2013, 12, 228–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Marinucci, L.; Balloni, S.; Fettucciari, K.; Bodo, M.; Talesa, V.N.; Antognelli, C. Nicotine induces apoptosis in human osteoblasts via a novel mechanism driven by H2O2 and entailing Glyoxalase 1-dependent MG-H1 accumulation leading to TG2-mediated NF-kB desensitization: Implication for smokers-related osteoporosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 117, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Antognelli, C.; Mancuso, F.; Frosini, R.; Arato, I.; Calvitti, M.; Calafiore, R.; Talesa, V.N.; Luca, G. testosterone and follicle stimulating hormone–dependent glyoxalase 1 up-regulation sustains the viability of porcine sertoli cells through the control of hydroimidazolone– and argpyrimidine-mediated NF-κB pathway. Am. J. Pathol. 2018, 188, 2553–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Nokin, M.J.; Durieux, F.; Bellier, J.; Peulen, O.; Uchida, K.; Spiegel, D.A.; Cochrane, J.R.; Hutton, C.A.; Castronovo, V.; Bellahcène, A. Hormetic potential of methylglyoxal, a side-product of glycolysis, in switching tumours from growth to death. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 11722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Kim, J.; Kim, O.S.; Kim, C.S.; Sohn, E.; Jo, K.; Kim, J.S. Accumulation of argpyrimidine, a methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end product, increases apoptosis of lens epithelial cells both in vitro and in vivo. Exp. Mol. Med. 2012, 29, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Hou, P.; Ji, M.; Xing, M. Association of PTEN gene methylation with genetic alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signaling pathway in thyroid tumors. Cancer 2008, 113, 2440–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Saini, S.; Tulla, K.; Maker, A.V.; Burman, K.D.; Prabhakar, B.S. Therapeutic advances in anaplastic thyroid cancer: A current perspective. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Nigro, C.; Nicolò, A.; Prevenzano, I.; Formisano, P.; Beguinot, F.; Miele, C. The dual-role of methylglyoxal in tumor progression—Novel therapeutic approaches. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 645686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lin, J.A.; Wu, C.H.; Yen, G.C. Methylglyoxal displays colorectal cancer-promoting properties in the murine models of azoxymethane and CT26 isografts. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 115, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Antognelli, C.; Mandarano, M.; Prosperi, E.; Sidoni, A.; Talesa, V.N. Glyoxalase-1-Dependent Methylglyoxal Depletion Sustains PD-L1 Expression in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells: A novel mechanism in cancer immunosurveillance escape and a potential novel target to overcome PD-L1 blockade resistance. Cancers 2021, 13, 2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Antognelli, C.; Moretti, S.; Frosini, R.; Puxeddu, E.; Sidoni, A.; Talesa, V.N. Methylglyoxal acts as a tumor-promoting factor in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Cells 2019, 8, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Wang, J.R.; Zafereo, M.E.; Dadu, R.; Ferrarotto, R.; Busaidy, N.L.; Lu, C.; Ahmed, S.; Gule-Monroe, M.K.; Williams, M.D.; Sturgis, E.M.; et al. Complete Surgical Resection Following Neoadjuvant Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib in BRAFV600E-Mutated Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 2019, 29, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Smolarczyk, R.; Cichoń, T.; Jarosz, M.; Szala, S. HMGB1—Its role in tumor progression and anticancer therapy. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. (Online) 2012, 66, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Davies, E.J.; Durban, V.M.; Meniel, V.; Williams, G.T.; Clarke, A.R. PTEN loss and KRAS activation leads to the formation of serrated adenomas and metastatic carcinoma in the mouse intestine. J. Pathol. 2014, 233, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Howell, G.M.; Hodak, S.P.; Yip, L. RAS mutations in thyroid cancer. Oncologist 2013, 18, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Poghosyan, Z.; Wynford-Thomas, D. Analysis of Ras Transformation of human thyroid epithelial cells. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 407, 648–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Tetzlaff, M.T.; Liu, A.; Xu, X.; Master, S.R.; Baldwin, D.A.; Tobias, J.W.; Livolsi, V.A.; Baloch, Z.W. Differential expression of miRNAs in papillary thyroid carcinoma compared to multinodular goiter using formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues. Endocr. Pathol. 2007, 18, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Shirvani-Farsani, Z.; Taheri, M. The role of microRNAs in the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer. Non-Coding RNA Res. 2020, 5, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Pallante, P.; Visone, R.; Ferracin, M.; Ferraro, A.; Berlingieri, M.T.; Troncone, G.; Chiappetta, G.; Liu, C.G.; Santoro, M.; Negrini, M.; et al. MicroRNA deregulation in human thyroid papillary carcinomas. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2006, 13, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Mardente, S.; Mari, E.; Consorti, F.; Di Gioia, C.; Negri, R.; Etna, M.; Zicari, A.; Antonaci, A. HMGB1 induces the overexpression of miR-222 and miR-221 and increases growth and motility in papillary thyroid cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 28, 2285–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chistiakov, D.A.; Sobenin, I.A.; Orekhov, A.N.; Bobryshev, Y.V. Human miR-221/222 in physiological and atherosclerotic vascular Remodeling. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 354517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Helfman, D.M.; Kim, E.J.; Lukanidin, E.; Grigorian, M. The metastasis associated protein S100A4: Role in tumour progression and metastasis. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 1955–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Dahlmann, M.; Okhrimenko, A.; Marcinkowski, P.; Osterland, M.; Herrmann, P.; Smith, J.; Heizmann, C.W.; Schlag, P.M.; Stein, U. RAGE mediates S100A4-induced cell motility via MAPK/ERK and hypoxia signaling and is a prognostic biomarker for human colorectal cancer metastasis. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 3220–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Medapati, M.R.; Dahlmann, M.; Ghavami, S.; Pathak, K.A.; Lucman, L.; Klonisch, T.; Hoang-Vu, C.; Stein, U.; Hombach-Klonisch, S. RAGE mediates the pro-migratory response of extracellular S100A4 in human thyroid cancer cells. Thyroid 2015, 25, 514–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Ito, Y.; Arai, K.; Nozawa, R.; Yoshida, H.; Hirokawa, M.; Fukushima, M.; Inoue, H.; Tomoda, C.; Kihara, M.; Higashiyama, T.; et al. S100A8 and S100A9 expression is a crucial factor for dedifferentiation in thyroid carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 4157–4161. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Reeb, A.N.; Li, W.; Sewell, W.; Marlow, L.A.; Tun, H.W.; Smallridge, R.C.; Copland, J.A.; Spradling, K.; Chernock, R.; Lin, R.Y. S100A8 is a novel therapeutic target for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Cross, S.S.; Hamdy, F.C.; Deloulme, J.C.; Rehman, I. Expression of S100 proteins in normal human tissues and common cancers using tissue microarrays: S100A6, S100A8, S100A9 and S100A11 are all overexpressed in common cancers. Histopathology 2005, 46, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.