Röseler, J.; Wolff, R.; Bauerschlag, D.O.; Maass, N.; Hillemanns, P.; Ferreira, H.; Debrouwere, M.; Scheibler, F.; Geiger, F.; Elessawy, M.
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3761.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173761
AMA Style
Röseler J, Wolff R, Bauerschlag DO, Maass N, Hillemanns P, Ferreira H, Debrouwere M, Scheibler F, Geiger F, Elessawy M.
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(17):3761.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173761
Chicago/Turabian Style
Röseler, Jona, Robert Wolff, Dirk O. Bauerschlag, Nicolai Maass, Peter Hillemanns, Helder Ferreira, Marie Debrouwere, Fülöp Scheibler, Friedemann Geiger, and Mohamed Elessawy.
2021. "Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 17: 3761.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173761
APA Style
Röseler, J., Wolff, R., Bauerschlag, D. O., Maass, N., Hillemanns, P., Ferreira, H., Debrouwere, M., Scheibler, F., Geiger, F., & Elessawy, M.
(2021). Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(17), 3761.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10173761