Next Article in Journal
In Situ Incorporation of TiO2@Graphene Oxide (GO) Nanosheets in Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-Based Membranes Matrix for Ultrafast Protein Separation
Next Article in Special Issue
An Electrochemistry and Computational Study at an Electrified Liquid–Liquid Interface for Studying Beta-Amyloid Aggregation
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding the Residence Time Distribution in a Transient Inline Spiking System: Modeling, Experiments, and Simulations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interactions of Surfactants with Biomimetic Membranes—2. Generation of Electric Potential with Non-Ionic Surfactants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Directly Using Ti3C2Tx MXene for a Solid-Contact Potentiometric pH Sensor toward Wearable Sweat pH Monitoring

Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Photoelectric Sensing Materials & Devices, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Sensing Materials & Devices, Center for Advanced Analytical Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(4), 376; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040376
Submission received: 25 January 2023 / Revised: 6 March 2023 / Accepted: 22 March 2023 / Published: 25 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Artificial and Biological Membranes, Volume II)

Abstract

:
The level of hydrogen ions in sweat is one of the most important physiological indexes for the health state of the human body. As a type of two-dimensional (2D) material, MXene has the advantages of superior electrical conductivity, a large surface area, and rich functional groups on the surface. Herein, we report a type of Ti3C2Tx-based potentiometric pH sensor for wearable sweat pH analysis. The Ti3C2Tx was prepared by two etching methods, including a mild LiF/HCl mixture and HF solution, which was directly used as the pH-sensitive materials. Both etched Ti3C2Tx showed a typical lamellar structure and exhibited enhanced potentiometric pH responses compared with a pristine precursor of Ti3AlC2. The HF-Ti3C2Tx disclosed the sensitivities of −43.51 ± 0.53 mV pH–1 (pH 1–11) and −42.73 ± 0.61 mV pH–1 (pH 11–1). A series of electrochemical tests demonstrated that HF-Ti3C2Tx exhibited better analytical performances, including sensitivity, selectivity, and reversibility, owing to deep etching. The HF-Ti3C2Tx was thus further fabricated as a flexible potentiometric pH sensor by virtue of its 2D characteristic. Upon integrating with a solid-contact Ag/AgCl reference electrode, the flexible sensor realized real-time monitoring of pH level in human sweat. The result disclosed a relatively stable pH value of ~6.5 after perspiration, which was consistent with the ex situ sweat pH test. This work offers a type of MXene-based potentiometric pH sensor for wearable sweat pH monitoring.

1. Introduction

MXenes, a family of two-dimensional (2D) materials, were discovered by Drexel University in 2011 [1]. The MXenes family is comprised of transition metal carbides, carbonitrides, and nitrides with a general formula of Mn+1Xn. M represents transition metals (such as Ti, Mo, Nb, etc.), X represents carbon and/or nitrogen, and Tx represents the functional groups on the surface of the MXene [2]. These materials have been demonstrated to have the advantages of high electrical conductivity, excellent mechanical properties, and abundant surface functional groups. Owing to these characteristics, MXenes have thus been widely used in the fields of catalysis (e.g., electrocatalysis and photocatalysis) [3,4,5], energy storage (e.g., batteries and supercapacitors) [6,7] and sensing (e.g., electrochemical sensors and resistive sensors) [8,9].
The concentration of hydrogen ions in physiological fluids such as sweat, saliva, and urine in the human body is closely related to various physiological diseases [10]. Sweat monitoring is a noninvasive way to record health information in real time [11,12,13,14]. Ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) represent a typical analytical method for the determination of ion concentration. However, traditional liquid-contact ISEs consist of an inner-filling solution, which results in difficulty in integration and miniaturization. The developed solid-contact ISEs (SC-ISEs) overcome this challenge based on a solid-state transduction layer [15,16,17,18,19]. The solid-contact layer plays an important role in ion-to-electron transduction, while the ion-selective membrane (ISM) works as the recognition of target ions. SC-ISEs have been widely used in wearable potentiometric ion sensing due to their miniaturization and integration [20,21,22,23]. The state-of-the-art solid-contact potentiometric pH sensors can be divided into three types [24], i.e., ISM-based, organic polymers (e.g., polyaniline), and metal oxide-based configurations. The ISMs containing hydrogen ions have been used for wearable pH sensors [25,26]. However, with ISMs, costly ionophores, possible water-layer effects, and weak mechanical strength could be rather challenging for their long-term wearable application. Polyaniline (PANI)-based pH sensors are the most-used devices for sweat pH monitoring [22,23,27,28,29,30]. Polyaniline itself has low toxicity, but its byproducts or monomers could cause potential biotoxicity [31]. Metal oxide-based pH sensors have been relatively less applied for wearable sensors [32]. A RuO2 [33,34] and IrO2 [35,36,37,38] precious metal-based pH sensor discloses excellent performances but is limited due to scarceness, while the non-precious metal oxides are hindered by relatively low sensitivity (e.g., WO3) [39,40,41,42].
In this work, the MXene of Ti3C2Tx was directly employed as a pH-sensitive material to fabricate a solid-contact potentiometric pH sensor. The Ti3C2Tx was prepared by etching the precursor of Ti3AlC2. After etching, the Ti3C2Tx contains surface-abundant functional groups that could be worked as hydrogen ion-sensitive sites. The HF-etched Ti3C2Tx disclosed a sensitivity up to −43.51 ± 0.53 mV pH–1 in a wide range (pH 1–11) and also a reversible response with a sensitivity of −42.73 ± 0.61 mV pH–1 (pH 11–1). In particular, a reversible pH response was shown for this material. Based on the flexible characteristic of the D Ti3C2Tx, it was further integrated into a wearable device with an Ag/AgCl solid reference electrode. The flexible Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor was successfully applied for on-body sweat pH monitoring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material and Apparatus

Ti3AlC2 (99%) was purchased from Jilin Yiyi Technology Co., Ltd. (Jilin, China). Hydrofluoric acid (HF, 49%) and silver chloride (AgCl, 99.5%) were purchased from Macklin (Shanghai, China). Lithium fluoride (LiF, 99%), boric acid (99.5%), acetic acid (99.5%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99%), N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, >99.0%), and ferric chloride (FeCl3, 98%) were obtained from Innochem (Beijing, China). Potassium chloride (KCl, 99.0–100.5%), sodium chloride (NaCl, 99.5%), lithium chloride (LiCl, ≥99%), magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O, 99.0–102.0%), Nafion solution (5 wt% in lower aliphatic alcohols and water), polyvinyl chloride (PVC, high molecular weight), tetrahydrofuran (THF, ≥99.9%), tridodecylmethyl ammonium chloride (TDMA-Cl, 98%), and bis (2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DOS, ≥97.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Potassium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (KTPFB, 97%) and ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, 99.5%) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA). Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), phosphoric acid (H3PO4, 85%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%) were purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory (Guangzhou, China). All aqueous solutions were prepared with ultrapure water (>18.2 MΩ cm, Milli Q, Darmstadt, Germany). The triacid mixture consisted of 0.04 M phosphate, boric acid and acetic acid. Britton–Robinson buffers (B-R buffer) with different pH were prepared by mixing different volumes of the triacid mixture and 0.2 M sodium hydroxide.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was carried out to examine the morphology and size of the Ti3C2Tx by using the Phenom nano SEM (Phenom Scientific, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The crystal structure characterization was recorded by X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD) using a Miniflex 600 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) by scanning in the 2θ range of 5−80° with Cu Kα radiation. The valence states of the materials were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Ti3C2Tx

The Ti3C2Tx was prepared according to a previous report [43]. Typically, MILD-Ti3C2Tx was synthesized by adding 2 g LiF into 40 mL 6 M HCl solution, followed by stirring until the powder was completely dissolved. Then, 1 g of Ti3AlC2 was slowly added into the above solution (~10 min). The mixture was kept stirred at 35 °C for 24 h. After etching, the sediment was washed with deionized water by centrifugation until the pH value of the supernatant was higher than pH 6. Then, the sediment was dried in a vacuum oven for 12 h to obtain MILD-Ti3C2Tx. The HF-Ti3C2Tx was synthesized by slowly adding 1 g Ti3AlC2 into 20 mL HF solution, followed by stirring for 24 h at 35 °C. After etching, the sediment was washed with deionized water by centrifugation until the pH value of the supernatant was higher than pH 6. Then, the sediment was dried in a vacuum oven for 12 h to obtain the HF-Ti3C2Tx.

2.3. Fabrication of Ti3C2Tx-Based pH Electrodes

pH sensing material inks were obtained by dispersing 10 mg MILD-Ti3C2Tx or 10 mg HF-Ti3C2Tx into 800 μL NMP and 200 μL Nafion solution. Nafion solution was used as a binder to adhere the sensing materials on the surface of the electrode. Glassy carbon electrodes (GCE) with a 5 mm diameter were used as the substrate electrode. The GCE was well-polished and washed separately in deionized water and ethanol, then dried by N2 blowing. The Ti3C2Tx-based pH electrode was further prepared by depositing 10 μL of the above ink on the GCE, and then the GCE was dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 1 h. The Ti3C2Tx-based pH electrode was conditioned in pH = 1 B-R buffer solution for 2 h before use. The purpose of this conditioning step was to promote the proton transport in the Ti3C2Tx sensing material, which is similar to the conditioning step for the solid-contact ion-selective electrodes. The controlled experiment of Ti3AlC2-based pH electrode followed the same procedure as Ti3C2Tx-based pH electrodes.

2.4. Fabrication of Flexible pH Sensor

Firstly, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane (8 cm × 8 cm) was cleaned by ultrasonication in acetone, ethanol, and deionized water, followed by O2 plasma treatment for 5 min. The microwell pattern of Ag electrodes was fabricated by the magnetron sputtering deposition technique AJA Orin5 (AJA, Wellesley, MA, USA) with respective 30 nm Cr and 200 nm Ag layers. Then, the electrodes were insulated by spin-coating a thin layer of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and then dried in an oven at 90 °C for 40 min. The Ti3C2Tx working electrode was fabricated on the obtained Ag-coated PET electrode in the same way as the GCE. The reference electrode was fabricated as follows.

2.5. Fabrication of Solid Ag/AgCl Reference Electrode

First, the Ag/AgCl electrode was prepared by immersing the Ag-coated PET electrode into 0.3 M FeCl3 solution for 10 s for partial oxidation of Ag to AgCl and was cleaned with deionized water. Then, the reference membrane solution was further coated on the Ag/AgCl electrode. The reference membrane solution was prepared by dissolving KTPFB (0.9 wt%), TDMA-Cl (1.1 wt%), DOS (68 wt%) and PVC (30 wt%) in THF. Then, 40.4 mg KCl and 15.3 mg AgCl powder were added into 250 µL of the above solution. In addition to the reference membrane layer, a reference protective layer was further coated. The reference protective layer cocktail was prepared by dissolving 4 g of PVC (33.1 wt%) and DOS (66.9 wt%) in 50 mL THF. The solid Ag/AgCl reference electrode was obtained by depositing 10 µL of reference membrane solution and 20 µL of reference protective layer cocktail, respectively. The dropping time interval of the two solutions was ~12 h.

2.6. Electrochemical Measurement Methods

The potentiometric measurements for sensitivity and selectivity were performed by using a multi-channel potentiometer EMF6 (Lawson Lab, Inc) at room temperature based on a two-electrode system. The working electrode was Ti3AlC2- or Ti3C2Tx-modified GCE. The reference electrode was a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). For the flexible pH sensor, a solid Ag/AgCl electrode was used as the reference electrode. The electromotive force (EMF) between the working and reference electrodes was recorded in different pH solutions in the range of pH 1–11. The B-R buffer solution was prepared by mixing 0.04 M three acid and 0.2 M NaOH with a tunable pH range of 2–11. A pH = 1 solution was prepared by diluting concentrated sulfuric acid.
The selectivity was evaluated by two methods. One was the continual addition of interfering ions, and the other was the separation solution method. The former involved adding each interfering ion (10 mM) into a pH 7 buffer solution to record the EMF. The separation solution method involved measuring potentiometric response curves for each interfering ion from 10–1 to 10–5 M.
For the on-body sweat pH test, the fabricated flexible HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor was worn on the forehead of a healthy male volunteer. A homemade mini-potentiometer with an input resistance of 1013 Ω was connected to the sensor. The data during the on-body test was recorded based on a mobile APP. Before the test, the sensor was calibrated by potentiometric tests in B-R buffer solutions (pH, 5–8). After the on-body test, the volunteer ran again, and the sweat was collected, which was tested by a simple pH strip for comparison. In addition, the flexible pH sensor was calibrated again to examine the stability of the sensor.

3. Results

3.1. Structures and Compositions of Ti3C2Tx

The preparation of Ti3C2Tx was carried out according to the established etching method (see the details in the experimental section). Briefly, two etching reagents of mild LiF/HCl and HF acid were used to exfoliate the pristine Ti3AlC2 (Figure 1a). After etching, the two products were named MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx, respectively. Their crystal structures were examined by XRD (Figure 1b). Typical MAX phase (002) planes were observed at nearly 2θ = 9° in the spectrum of Ti3AlC2. The decreased intensity of the (002) patterns in MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx was due to expanded interlayer spacing after the successful removal of Al from Ti3AlC2 [43]. In addition, it was found that the overall crystallinity was significantly weakened after etching, and the characteristic diffraction pattern at 39° for the (104) planes of Ti3AlC2 disappeared in the XRD spectra of MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx, suggesting that the Al layer was etched [44].
The morphologies of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx were examined by scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) (Figure 1c–e). The MAX phase of pristine Ti3AlC2 exhibits a dense layer structure (Figure 1c). After the etching by LiF/HCl or HF, the structure was exfoliated, thus exhibiting a typical lamellar structure (Figure 1d,e). The interlayer spacing was remarkably expanded. The EDS mapping analysis of representative HF-Ti3C2Tx is presented in Figure 1f. It was found that the Ti, C, O, and F atoms were distributed in the material. However, the content of the Al atoms in MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx decreased significantly. Element analysis data shows the atomic content of Al atoms decreased to ~0.5% after etching (Figure S1), which further confirms the successful preparation of Ti3C2Tx.
The elemental compositions and valence states of the Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). XPS survey spectra of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx are shown in Figure 2a. It confirmed the presence of Ti, C, Al and O in the pristine Ti3AlC2 in which the O element originated from the oxidation of the sample during the long-term storage. After etching, the F element could be clearly distinguished in both MILD- and HF-Ti3C2Tx. The high-resolution Ti 2p XPS spectra were further examined in Figure 2b. As shown in the spectrum of Ti3AlC2, three double peaks were located at 463.6 and 460.5 eV (TiO2, 2p1/2 and 2p3/2), 459.3 and 454.7 eV (Ti-Al, 2p1/2 and 2p3/2), and 457.8 and 453.4 eV (Ti-C, 2p1/2 and 2p3/2). As presented in the Ti 2p spectra of MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx, three double peaks were assigned to Ti-C, Ti(II), and Ti(III), respectively [45]. It was found that the Ti-Al bond of Ti3AlC2 disappeared, indicating that the Al atom was etched. F 1s XPS spectra further demonstrated the F element introduction after etching (Figure 2c). Overall, the XPS analysis confirmed the elemental compositions of the prepared Ti3C2Tx, and the existence of redox Ti2+/3+ could play a role in ion-to-electron transduction.

3.2. Potentiometric pH Response

The above results have identified the structures and compositions of pristine Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. In this section, their potentiometric pH responses were further examined. Figure 2a–c shows the pH reversible responses of the pristine Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx electrodes recorded within the pH range of 1–11. Upon increasing the pH, the electromotive force (EMF) signals of the Ti3AlC2 electrode show an irregular decrease. It has a poor reversible response and potential stability. The slope for Ti3AlC2 (−22.14 ± 5.18 mV pH–1 between pH 1 and 11) significantly deviates from Nernstian sensitivity. Since Ti3AlC2 is a raw material without etching, poor electronic conductivity resulted in difficulties in efficient proton-to-electron transduction. In addition, fewer functional groups on the surface of Ti3AlC2 could cause difficulties for the proton association, leading to low sensitivity. However, the MILD-Ti3C2Tx electrode reveals a reversible response and much-improved reproducibility, and the sensitivity for MILD-Ti3C2Tx increased to −37.91 ± 0.63 and −36.26 ± 0.25 mV pH−1 for the forward and reverse pH tests, respectively (Figure 3b,e). HF-Ti3C2Tx further discloses nearly overlapped and reversible pH responses (Figure 3c), and the slope is up to −43.51 ± 0.53 mV pH−1 (forward, pH 1–11) and −42.73 ± 0.61 mV pH−1 (reverse, pH 11–1) (Figure 3f). These results demonstrated that MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx, after etching, could efficiently achieve the transduction of protons to electrons. In addition, the introduced functional groups of -OH and -F increased the sites for proton association. Therefore, its pH response sensitivity and reproducibility have been significantly improved.
Selectivity is another important parameter for ion-selective electrodes. Two methods were used to evaluate this parameter. One was the continual addition of interfering ions (Figure 4a–c), and the other was the separation solution method (Figure 4d–f). As shown in Figure 4a, upon changing the pH 6 buffer solution to pH 7, there is an obvious potential response. However, through continually adding 10 mM interfering ions in pH 7 buffer solution, the potential of Ti3AlC2 changes apparently, while relatively small changes are observed for MILD-Ti3C2Tx. In addition, we further evaluated the selectivity using the separation solution method according to Figure 4d–f. When the concentration of the interference ions changes from 10–1 to 10–5 M, the precursor of Ti3AlC2 responds to all interference ions, in which the sensitivities for some interfering ions are even higher than the target H+ (−20.77 ± 7.42 mV pH−1), for example (−28.52 ± 6.66 mV dec−1 for K+ and −31.66 ± 4.85 mV dec−1 for NH4+) (Figure 4d). The MILD-Ti3C2Tx shows higher sensitivity toward H+. However, it should be noted that the potentiometric pH curve (black line, Figure 4e) partly overlaps with interfering ions, and the potential between pH = 3 and 5 is even lower than that of interfering ions (Figure 4e). This result demonstrates that the hydrogen ion selectivity for MILD-Ti3C2Tx remains insufficient. However, the potentiometric pH curve of HF-Ti3C2Tx is above all interfering ions (Figure 4f), which discloses its better selectivity.
The above results demonstrated that the deeply-etched HF-Ti3C2Tx shows the best potentiometric pH response performances compared with MILD-Ti3C2Tx and pristine Ti3AlC2. The purpose of the etching step is to remove Al atoms in Ti3AlC2. The precursor of Ti3AlC2 is nearly an insulator. After etching, the Ti3C2Tx becomes more conductive [43], which is beneficial to proton-to-electron transduction. In addition, plenty of functional groups, such as –OH, –O, and –F, were produced on the surface of Ti3C2Tx. These groups could play the role of association sites that exchange with protons and couple with the transition metal redox transition of Ti3+/2+ (i.e., proton-coupled-electron transfer), resulting in a potentiometric pH response. Furthermore, the Ti3C2Tx owns an exfoliated structure after etching, which could promote proton transport in the interlayer of Ti3C2Tx. We also compared the Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor with literature results (Table 1). It was found that the linear range (pH 1–11) of HF-Ti3C2Tx is better than PANI (pH 4–9) and comparable to metal oxides. Regarding the sensitivity, it is lower than the RuO2 and IrOx but competitive to PANI and non-precious metal oxides (e.g., WO3 [41] and ZnO [46]). For example, the reported PANI/MXene [30] composite exhibits a sensitivity of −41.91 mV pH–1, which is lower than the as-prepared HF-Ti3C2Tx (−43.51 mV pH–1). The PANI/LGG-MXene discloses a high sensitivity up to −57.03 mV pH–1 but only in a narrow range (pH, 5–9) [47]. In addition, it should be noted that their pH responses originated from PANI. However, our results demonstrate that MXene itself could be directly used as a promising pH-sensitive material.

3.3. Flexible pH Sensor and On-Body Sweat Monitoring

The above potentiometric pH response tests have identified that HF-Ti3C2Tx disclosed the best sensitivity, reproducibility and selectivity. In this section, a flexible pH sensor based on HF-Ti3C2Tx was fabricated and applied for on-body sweat pH monitoring. The Ti3C2Tx-based pH working electrode (WE) and reference electrode (RE) of Ag/AgCl were designed (Figure 5a–d). The detailed fabrication process was described in the experimental section. Briefly, a flexible polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate, after plasma cleaning, was deposited with layers of 30 nm Cr and 200 nm Ag by the magnetron sputtering technique. For the WE, the HF-Ti3C2Tx ink was directly dropped on the conductive Ag substrate. For the RE, the Ag substrate was further transformed to Ag/AgCl by FeCl3 oxidation, and the solid electrolyte (polymer-encapsulated KCl) was further coated on the Ag/AgCl (solid RE of Ag/AgCl/KCl). The bending tests for the WE are shown in Figure S5. Upon curving over 60°, nearly overlapped potentials at each pH resulted (Figure S5). These results indicate that the prepared flexible pH sensor could be used for the on-body test.
Finally, on-body pH sweat monitoring was examined (Figure 5b–f). One volunteer ran outdoors with the sensor on the forehead and a homemade mini-potentiometer on the arm (Figure 5b). A sweat belt was used to fix the sensor and direct the sweat to the sensor. The potentiometer contains a Bluetooth module that transports the signal to a cell phone. Before the test, the solid RE of Ag/AgCl was examined toward interference ions and a few representative organic components in sweat. Figure 5c exhibits no apparent potential change upon the addition of these interfering components with a maximum potential fluctuation of less than 1 mV. As shown in Figure 5d, the real-time on-body sweat pH monitoring curve was recorded. After about 14 min, sweat was produced, and the potential showed a relatively steady state. The average pH from 850 to 1250 s was determined to be 6.5 according to the calibration curves. To verify the accuracy of the real-time result, a sweat sample was collected through the same exercise process and was tested with a precision pH paper. A similar value was obtained (pH = 6.4) according to Figure 5e. Additionally, we examined the calibration curves of the sensor after the on-body test (Figure 5f and Figure S6). It was found that there is some degree of potential differences at pH = 4 (~15 mV) and pH = 5 (~8 mV) before and after the on-body test, but this difference is less than 5 mV at pH = 6 to 8. The sweat pH was determined to be around 6.5, so it has no significant effect on the calibration. Overall, the test results indicate reliable on-body pH monitoring in real time.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a Ti3C2Tx-based wearable solid-contact potentiometric pH sensor for sweat pH monitoring. It has been demonstrated that the deeply etched HF-Ti3C2Tx disclosed the best pH analytical performances compared with the precursor of Ti3Al2 and MILD-Ti3C2Tx owing to its high conductivity and abundant surface functional groups for proton association. The HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor revealed a sensitivity of −43.51 ± 0.53 mV pH–1 (pH 1–11) and −42.73 ± 0.61 mV pH–1 (pH 11–1), which is comparable to representative transition-metal oxide-based pH sensors. The sensor also revealed reversible and reproducible characteristics, which was proved by nearly overlapped potentiometric pH response curves upon forward and reverse tests. In addition, the HF-Ti3C2Tx also showed good selectivity, which was confirmed by both the continual addition method and the separation solution method. Furthermore, this fabricated flexible pH sensing device has realized on-body sweat pH monitoring. The online monitoring pH value is consistent with the ex situ results, suggesting its reliability. The 2D Ti3C2Tx could be recognized as a new type of potentiometric pH sensor that can be applied as advanced wearable pH devices toward health monitoring.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes13040376/s1, Figure S1: Element mapping and compositions for MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. Figure S2: Potentiometric responses of Ti3AlC2 electrodes toward a series of interfering ions. Figure S3: Potentiometric responses of MILD-Ti3C2Tx electrodes toward a series of interfering ions. Figure S4: Potentiometric responses of HF-Ti3C2Tx electrodes toward a series of interfering ions. Figure S5: Potential response curves of HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor under normal and bending state. Figure S6: Potential response of HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor before and after sweat test.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z.; methodology, R.L.; validation, Y.Z., Y.T. and R.L.; formal analysis, R.L.; M.L., W.W., S.G. and T.H.; resources, Y.B. and Y.M.; software, Y.M. and Y.B.; investigation, R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, R.L.; writing—review and editing, R.L., S.G. and L.Z.; visualization, R.L.; supervision, L.Z. and L.N.; project administration, L.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21974031, 21974032 and 22174027), the Science and Technology Research Project of Guangzhou (202102020787 and 202201000002), the Key Discipline of Materials Science and Engineering, Bureau of Education of Guangzhou (202255464), and the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (2019B010933001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed signed consent was obtained from the volunteer engaging in the activity of this study.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4248–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mohammadi, A.V.; Rosen, J.; Gogotsi, Y. The world of two-dimensional carbides and nitrides (MXenes). Science 2021, 372, eabf158. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tang, Y.; Yang, C.; Xu, X.; Kang, Y.; Henzie, J.; Que, W.; Yamauchi, Y. MXene Nanoarchitectonics: Defect-Engineered 2D MXenes towards Enhanced Electrochemical Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. You, Z.; Liao, Y.; Li, X.; Fan, J.; Xiang, Q. State-of-the-art recent progress in MXene-based photocatalysts: A comprehensive review. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 9463–9504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, K.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Fan, J.; Lv, K. MXenes as noble-metal-alternative co-catalysts in photocatalysis. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, X.; Huang, Z.; Shuck, C.E.; Liang, G.; Gogotsi, Y.; Zhi, C. MXene chemistry, electrochemistry and energy storage applications. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2022, 6, 389–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anasori, B.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Gogotsi, Y. 2D metal carbides and nitrides (MXenes) for energy storage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ab Latif, F.E.; Numan, A.; Mubarak, N.M.; Khalid, M.; Abdullah, E.C.; Manaf, N.A.; Walvekar, R. Evolution of MXene and its 2D heterostructure in electrochemical sensor applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 471, 214755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Echols, I.J.; An, H.; Zhao, X.; Prehn, E.M.; Tan, Z.; Radovic, M.; Green, M.J.; Lutkenhaus, J.L. pH-Response of polycation/Ti3C2Tx MXene layer-by-layer assemblies for use as resistive sensors. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2020, 5, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghoneim, M.T.; Nguyen, A.; Dereje, N.; Huang, J.; Moore, G.C.; Murzynowski, P.J.; Dagdeviren, C. Recent Progress in Electrochemical pH-Sensing Materials and Configurations for Biomedical Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5248–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yin, L.; Cao, M.; Kim, K.N.; Lin, M.; Moon, J.-M.; Sempionatto, J.R.; Yu, J.; Liu, R.; Wicker, C.; Trifonov, A.; et al. A stretchable epidermal sweat sensing platform with an integrated printed battery and electrochromic display. Nat. Electron. 2022, 5, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ghaffari, R.; Yang, D.S.; Kim, J.; Mansour, A.; Wright, J.A., Jr.; Model, J.B.; Wright, D.E.; Rogers, J.A.; Ray, T.R. State of Sweat: Emerging Wearable Systems for Real-Time, Noninvasive Sweat Sensing and Analytics. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 2787–2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mohan, A.M.V.; Rajendran, V.; Mishra, R.K.; Jayaraman, M. Recent advances and perspectives in sweat based wearable electrochemical sensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 131, 116024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bariya, M.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Javey, A. Wearable sweat sensors. Nat. Electron. 2018, 1, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zdrachek, E.; Bakker, E. Potentiometric Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 72–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent advances in solid-contact ion-selective electrodes: Functional materials, transduction mechanisms, and development trends. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 4405–4465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ding, J.; Qin, W. Recent advances in potentiometric biosensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 124, 115803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zdrachek, E.; Bakker, E. Potentiometric Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bobacka, J. Conducting polymer-based solid-state ion-selective electrodes. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lyu, Y.; Gan, S.; Bao, Y.; Zhong, L.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Yang, G.; Niu, L. Solid-Contact Ion-Selective Electrodes: Response Mechanisms, Transducer Materials and Wearable Sensors. Membranes 2020, 10, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parrilla, M.; Cuartero, M.; Crespo, G.A. Wearable potentiometric ion sensors. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 110, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gao, W.; Emaminejad, S.; Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Peck, A.; Fahad, H.M.; Ota, H.; Shiraki, H.; Kiriya, D.; et al. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature 2016, 529, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. He, W.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Jian, M.; Lu, W.; Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Y. Integrated textile sensor patch for real-time and multiplex sweat analysis. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaax0649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Tang, Y.; Zhong, L.; Wang, W.; He, Y.; Han, T.; Xu, L.; Mo, X.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Y.; Bao, Y.; et al. Recent Advances in Wearable Potentiometric pH Sensors. Membranes 2022, 12, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. An, Q.; Gan, S.; Xu, J.; Bao, Y.; Wu, T.; Kong, H.; Zhong, L.; Ma, Y.; Song, Z.; Niu, L. A multichannel electrochemical all-solid-state wearable potentiometric sensor for real-time sweat ion monitoring. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 107, 106553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Gan, S.; Gao, H.; Kong, H.; Song, Z.; Ge, X.; Bao, Y.; Niu, L. Highly Stretchable Fiber-Based Potentiometric Ion Sensors for Multichannel Real-Time Analysis of Human Sweat. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 2834–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guinovart, T.; Valdés-Ramírez, G.; Windmiller, J.R.; Andrade, F.J.; Wang, J. Bandage-Based Wearable Potentiometric Sensor for Monitoring Wound pH. Electroanalysis 2014, 26, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nyein, H.Y.Y.; Gao, W.; Shahpar, Z.; Emaminejad, S.; Challa, S.; Chen, K.; Fahad, H.M.; Tai, L.-C.; Ota, H.; Davis, R.W.; et al. A Wearable Electrochemical Platform for Noninvasive Simultaneous Monitoring of Ca2+ and pH. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7216–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhai, Q.; Yap, L.W.; Wang, R.; Gong, S.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Lyu, Q.; Wang, J.; Simon, G.P.; Cheng, W. Vertically Aligned Gold Nanowires as Stretchable and Wearable Epidermal Ion-Selective Electrode for Noninvasive Multiplexed Sweat Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 4647–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, L.; Chen, F.; Liu, G.; Lin, H.; Bao, Y.; Han, D.; Wang, W.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, B.; Niu, L. Superhydrophobic Functionalized Ti3C2Tx MXene-Based Skin-Attachable and Wearable Electrochemical pH Sensor for Real-Time Sweat Detection. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 7319–7328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ibarra, L.E.; Tarres, L.; Bongiovanni, S.; Barbero, C.A.; Kogan, M.J.; Rivarola, V.A.; Bertuzzi, M.L.; Yslas, E.I. Assessment of polyaniline nanoparticles toxicity and teratogenicity in aquatic environment using Rhinella arenarum model. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Manjakkal, L.; Szwagierczak, D.; Dahiya, R. Metal oxides based electrochemical pH sensors: Current progress and future perspectives. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 109, 100635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liao, Y.-H.; Chou, J.-C. Preparation and characteristics of ruthenium dioxide for pH array sensors with real-time measurement system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 128, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, B.; Zhang, W.-D. Modification of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes with RuO2 for a solid-state pH sensor. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 2859–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marzouk, S.A.M.; Ufer, S.; Buck, R.P.; Johnson, T.A.; Dunlap, L.A.; Cascio, W.E. Electrodeposited Iridium Oxide pH Electrode for Measurement of Extracellular Myocardial Acidosis during Acute Ischemia. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5054–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huang, W.-D.; Cao, H.; Deb, S.; Chiao, M.; Chiao, J.C. A flexible pH sensor based on the iridium oxide sensing film. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2011, 169, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prats-Alfonso, E.; Abad, L.; Casañ-Pastor, N.; Gonzalo-Ruiz, J.; Baldrich, E. Iridium oxide pH sensor for biomedical applications. Case urea–urease in real urine samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 39, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zamora, M.L.; Dominguez, J.M.; Trujillo, R.M.; Goy, C.B.; Sánchez, M.A.; Madrid, R.E. Potentiometric textile-based pH sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 260, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chiang, J.L.; Jan, S.S.; Chou, J.C.; Chen, Y.C. Study on the temperature effect, hysteresis and drift of pH-ISFET devices based on amorphous tungsten oxide. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2001, 76, 624–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, W.-D.; Xu, B. A solid-state pH sensor based on WO3-modified vertically aligned multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 1038–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Choi, S.-J.; Savagatrup, S.; Kim, Y.; Lang, J.H.; Swager, T.M. Precision pH Sensor Based on WO3 Nanofiber-Polymer Composites and Differential Amplification. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 2593–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tang, Y.; Gan, S.; Zhong, L.; Sun, Z.; Xu, L.; Liao, C.; Lin, K.; Cui, X.; He, D.; Ma, Y.; et al. Lattice Proton Intercalation to Regulate WO3-Based Solid-Contact Wearable pH Sensor for Sweat Analysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shahzad, F.; Iqbal, A.; Kim, H.; Koo, C.M. 2D Transition Metal Carbides (MXenes): Applications as an Electrically Conducting Material. Adv Mater. 2020, 32, 2002159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Lelyukh, P.; Clark, L.; Sin, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Guidelines for Synthesis and Processing of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2TX MXene). Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, J.; Qin, R.; Yan, L.; Chi, Z.; Yu, Z.; Li, N.; Hu, M.; Chen, H.; Shan, G. Plasmonic Light Illumination Creates a Channel to Achieve Fast Degradation of Ti3C2Tx Nanosheets. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7285–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Young, S.J.; Lai, L.T.; Tang, W.L. Improving the Performance of pH Sensors with One-Dimensional ZnO Nanostructures. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 10972–10976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sharifuzzaman, M.; Chhetry, A.; Zahed, M.A.; Yoon, S.H.; Park, C.I.; Zhang, S.; Chandra Barman, S.; Sharma, S.; Yoon, H.; Park, J.Y. Smart bandage with integrated multifunctional sensors based on MXene-functionalized porous graphene scaffold for chronic wound care management. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 169, 112637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choi, M.-Y.; Lee, M.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, S.; Choi, J.; So, J.-H.; Koo, H.-J. A fully textile-based skin pH sensor. J. Ind. Text. 2022, 51, 441S–457S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation of Ti3C2Tx and morphologies. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Ti3C2Tx by two etching methods; (b) XRD patterns for the Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (ce) SEM images of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (f) EDS mapping analysis of HF-Ti3C2Tx.
Figure 1. Preparation of Ti3C2Tx and morphologies. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Ti3C2Tx by two etching methods; (b) XRD patterns for the Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (ce) SEM images of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (f) EDS mapping analysis of HF-Ti3C2Tx.
Membranes 13 00376 g001
Figure 2. Element compositions and valence states for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (a) XPS survey spectra of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (b) XPS spectra of Ti 2p for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (c) XPS spectra of F 1s for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx.
Figure 2. Element compositions and valence states for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (a) XPS survey spectra of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (b) XPS spectra of Ti 2p for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. (c) XPS spectra of F 1s for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx.
Membranes 13 00376 g002
Figure 3. Potentiometric pH responses. (ac) Examination of pH reversible responses for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. All tests have been performed on six individual electrodes as shown in different colors (n = 6). (df) pH response calibration curves for the three types of pH electrodes. Corresponding sensitivities for the forward (pH = 1–11) and reverse (pH = 11–1) tests are shown in the Figures.
Figure 3. Potentiometric pH responses. (ac) Examination of pH reversible responses for Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx and HF-Ti3C2Tx. All tests have been performed on six individual electrodes as shown in different colors (n = 6). (df) pH response calibration curves for the three types of pH electrodes. Corresponding sensitivities for the forward (pH = 1–11) and reverse (pH = 11–1) tests are shown in the Figures.
Membranes 13 00376 g003
Figure 4. Selectivity evaluation. (ac) The selectivity examination of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx by continually adding interfering ions. (df) The selectivity examination of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx by separation solution method. All potentiometric tests were performed on six individual electrodes (n = 6). The data represent the average values. Corresponding potentiometric response curves are shown in Figures S2–S4.
Figure 4. Selectivity evaluation. (ac) The selectivity examination of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx by continually adding interfering ions. (df) The selectivity examination of Ti3AlC2, MILD-Ti3C2Tx, and HF-Ti3C2Tx by separation solution method. All potentiometric tests were performed on six individual electrodes (n = 6). The data represent the average values. Corresponding potentiometric response curves are shown in Figures S2–S4.
Membranes 13 00376 g004
Figure 5. Flexibility pH sensor for on-body sweat pH analysis. (a) The schematic fabrication of flexible pH sensor including PET substrate cleaning by O2 plasma, Ag patterning by sputter, insulation layer deposition by PDMS, and WE/RE electrode modification by drop casting. The final fabricated flexible pH electrode is shown on the right side. (b) A photograph illustrates the on-body test of sweat pH monitoring during outdoor running. (c) The ion anti-interference test for the solid Ag/AgCl RE. (d) On-body test pH analysis by the device. (e) A comparison of sweat pH measured by HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor and pH meter. (f) Calibration curves of the HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor before and after sweat test.
Figure 5. Flexibility pH sensor for on-body sweat pH analysis. (a) The schematic fabrication of flexible pH sensor including PET substrate cleaning by O2 plasma, Ag patterning by sputter, insulation layer deposition by PDMS, and WE/RE electrode modification by drop casting. The final fabricated flexible pH electrode is shown on the right side. (b) A photograph illustrates the on-body test of sweat pH monitoring during outdoor running. (c) The ion anti-interference test for the solid Ag/AgCl RE. (d) On-body test pH analysis by the device. (e) A comparison of sweat pH measured by HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor and pH meter. (f) Calibration curves of the HF-Ti3C2Tx-based pH sensor before and after sweat test.
Membranes 13 00376 g005
Table 1. The comparison of analytical performances between this work and other reported potentiometric pH sensors.
Table 1. The comparison of analytical performances between this work and other reported potentiometric pH sensors.
MaterialsLinear pH RangeSensitivity (mV pH-1)References
PANI/MXene1–11−41.91[30]
RuO21–13−49.8 to −59.1[33]
RuO22–12−55[34]
IrOx2–12−51.1[36]
IrO24–8−47.54[38]
WO31–7−44.85[39]
WO3/MWCNT2–12−41.0[40]
WO3 nanofiber3–11−38.5[41]
ZnO nanorods4–10−44.56[46]
PANI/LGG-MXene4–9−57.03[47]
PANI/CNT5–9−45.9[48]
MILD-Ti3C2Tx 1–11−37.91 ± 0.63This work
HF-Ti3C2Tx 1–11−43.51 ± 0.53This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, R.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Lai, M.; Han, T.; Wang, W.; Bao, Y.; Ma, Y.; Gan, S.; et al. Directly Using Ti3C2Tx MXene for a Solid-Contact Potentiometric pH Sensor toward Wearable Sweat pH Monitoring. Membranes 2023, 13, 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040376

AMA Style

Liang R, Zhong L, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Lai M, Han T, Wang W, Bao Y, Ma Y, Gan S, et al. Directly Using Ti3C2Tx MXene for a Solid-Contact Potentiometric pH Sensor toward Wearable Sweat pH Monitoring. Membranes. 2023; 13(4):376. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040376

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Rongfeng, Lijie Zhong, Yirong Zhang, Yitian Tang, Meixue Lai, Tingting Han, Wei Wang, Yu Bao, Yingming Ma, Shiyu Gan, and et al. 2023. "Directly Using Ti3C2Tx MXene for a Solid-Contact Potentiometric pH Sensor toward Wearable Sweat pH Monitoring" Membranes 13, no. 4: 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13040376

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop