Skip Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
AntioxidantsAntioxidants
  • Review
  • Open Access

18 June 2025

Prebiotic Oligosaccharides in Skin Health: Benefits, Mechanisms, and Cosmetic Applications

,
,
,
and
1
Meat Processing Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
2
National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Energy Plant Biofuel Preparation and Utilization, College of Chemistry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China
3
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Resources Biorefinery, School of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds: The Role of Peptides, Polysaccharides, and Antioxidants in Nutriceutical Development and Health Promotion

Abstract

Prebiotic oligosaccharides have attracted significant interest in dermatology and skin health due to their ability to modulate the skin microbiome and microbiota–host interactions. This review offers a novel dual perspective, systematically examining the benefits of both oral intake and topical application of prebiotic oligosaccharides, including well-established prebiotics (e.g., human milk oligosaccharides, galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides) and emerging prebiotic candidates (e.g., gluco-oligosaccharides, chitosan-oligosaccharides, agaro-oligosaccharides). First, cutting-edge synthetic processes for producing diverse oligosaccharides and their structural chemistry are introduced. Then, we discuss in vitro studies demonstrating their efficacy in promoting skin commensals, inhibiting pathogens, and conferring protective effects, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-melanogenic, and wound-healing properties. Furthermore, we emphasize in vivo animal studies and clinical trials revealing that prebiotic oligosaccharides, administered orally or topically, alleviate atopic dermatitis, enhance skin hydration, attenuate acne, and protect against photo-aging by modulating skin–gut microbiota and immune responses. Mechanistically, we integrate genetic and molecular insights to elucidate how oligosaccharides mediate these benefits, including gut–skin axis crosstalk, immune regulation, and microbial metabolite signaling. Finally, we highlight current commercial applications of oligosaccharides in cosmetic formulations while addressing scientific and practical challenges, such as structure–function relationships, clinical scalability, and regulatory considerations. This review bridges mechanistic understanding with practical applications, offering a comprehensive resource for advancing prebiotic oligosaccharides-based skincare therapies.

1. Introduction

The skin microbiota, the human body’s second-largest microbial community after the gut, plays a crucial role in skin disease and well-being [1,2]. Skin microbiota can be commensal, mutualistic (beneficial), or pathogenic. A balanced composition of commensal (e.g., Staphylococcus epidermidis, Cutibacterium acnes) and pathogenic (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus) microorganisms maintains skin homeostasis [3], while dysbiosis contributes to disorders like atopic dermatitis, acne, psoriasis, etc. [4,5,6,7]. In addition, the skin microbiota also actively supports skin barrier function, including skin hydration, anti-aging, anti-melanogenesis, etc. [1,8].
Prebiotics have recently gained significant attention in dermatology and skin health due to their ability to modulate host microbiota beyond the gastrointestinal tract [9,10]. Defined as substrates selectively utilized by host microorganisms to confer health benefits, prebiotics now encompass compounds targeting diverse microbial communities, including those residing on the skin [11,12,13]. While dietary fibers, like fructans, carrageenan, and fucoidans, have been extensively reviewed for skin health benefits [14,15,16], prebiotic oligosaccharides, which usually consist of 2–20 monosaccharide units, represent particularly promising skin therapies. Well-established prebiotic oligosaccharides include human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs), and fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs), which show efficacy in mitigating atopic dermatitis [17,18,19]. Emerging oligosaccharides, such as gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOSs), xylo-oligosaccharides (XOSs), chitosan oligosaccharides (COSs), agaro-oligosaccharides (AOSs), etc., exhibit diverse biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-aging effects, as evidenced by in vitro and in vivo studies [20,21,22].
Current research on prebiotic oligosaccharides has primarily investigated their oral administration and systemic effects on skin health. But accumulating evidence now demonstrates the efficacy of topical application in delivering targeted dermatological benefits [18,23]. Clinical studies have documented that GOSs incorporated in cosmetic formulations significantly enhance skin hydration, particularly improving water-holding capacity and reducing transepidermal water loss in healthy female subjects [24,25]. Furthermore, emerging clinical evidence supports the anti-aging and photoprotective properties of various functional oligosaccharides when applied topically, including GlcOSs [26], XOSs [21], and COSs [27]. These findings highlight the dual mechanisms of oligosaccharides through oral intake or topical application, underscoring their considerable potential as active ingredients in advanced cosmetic formulations, which aligns with the growing consumer demand for science-backed, bioactive ingredients for next-generation skincare products.
Despite substantial evidence supporting the skin health benefits of functional oligosaccharides, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding their mechanisms of action. For example, oral administration of HMOs has been shown to alleviate pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) through gut microbiota modulation and immune system interactions [17], but the underlying biological pathways require further elucidation. Similarly, in vitro and in vivo studies observed benefits of GOSs, FOSs, and GlcOSs in acne management, skin hydration, anti-aging, etc. [28,29,30]. However, methodological inconsistencies across studies and insufficient investigation of the structure–biological function relationships of oligosaccharides significantly limit the basic understanding of their mechanisms of action. Particularly, the underlying mechanisms of topically applied prebiotic oligosaccharides remain poorly understood because of the scarcity of dedicated studies.
Therefore, this review comprehensively summarizes recent advances in the applications of well-established and tentative prebiotic oligosaccharides—both orally and topically—in modulating skin microbiota and their subsequent effects on skin health and cosmetic benefits (illustrated in Figure 1). These benefits include, but are not limited to, the alleviation of atopic dermatitis, acne prevention, enhanced skin hydration, anti-melanogenesis, anti-aging properties, and photoprotection. First, well-established and tentative prebiotic oligosaccharides are introduced, covering their chemical structures and novel production methods. Next, we systematically review in vitro and in vivo studies elucidating the functional roles of oligosaccharides in skin health, followed by an in-depth discussion of their underlying mechanisms of action. Additionally, this review examines the practical utilization of prebiotic oligosaccharides in commercial cosmetic formulations, emphasizing key bioactive ingredients and their integration into skincare products. Finally, we address current challenges and propose future research directions to advance this promising field.
Figure 1. Illustration of prebiotic oligosaccharides through oral administration or topical application to confer health benefits to the skin and application in cosmetic formulations.

2. Prebiotic Oligosaccharides: Chemical Structures and Novel Production Methods

The International Association of Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) defines prebiotics as substrates selectively utilized by host microorganisms to confer health benefits, including those targeting extraintestinal niches like the skin [12]. While formally recognized prebiotics include non-digestible oligosaccharides, such as human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs), and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs), emerging candidates, like gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOSs), xylo-oligosaccharides (XOSs), and chitosan oligosaccharides (COSs), are gaining plenty of attention. This section summarizes the skin-beneficial oligosaccharides, detailing their structural characteristics (monomeric composition, degree of polymerization, glycosidic linkages) and production methods (Table 1), as these parameters critically determine their skin health efficacy.
Table 1. Structural characteristics and production methods of well-established and tentative prebiotic oligosaccharides.

2.1. Human Milk Oligosaccharides (HMOs)

The first recognized group of prebiotics includes HMOs, with approximately 200 different structures characterized in human breast milk [12,32]. Structurally, HMOs consist of fucose (Fuc) and/or N-Acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) attached to galactose, N-Acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), or glucose residues, classifying them into fucosylated, sialylated, and neutral core HMOs [51]. For research purposes, HMOs can be isolated directly from breast milk or synthesized through enzymatic, chemical, or chemoenzymatic methods. Enzymatic methods catalyzed by glycosidases, glycotransferases, or glycosynthases enable the production of diverse HMOs with varying DPs, monomer compositions, and glycosidic linkages [32]. Commercial-scale production of HMOs relies on microbial fermentation techniques, where metabolically engineered microorganisms (primarily E. coli) convert inexpensive carbon sources, such as lactose and glucose, into HMOs [31,32,33]. As illustrated in Figure 2, the strains are modified to express glycosyltransferases and synthesize sugar nucleotides (e.g., CMP-Neu5Ac, GDP-Fuc, UDP-GlcNAc) in vivo. The glycosyltransferases then transfer sugar moieties (e.g., sialy group, fucosyl groups) to lactose, yielding HMOs, such as 3′-sialylactose/6′-sialylactose and 2′-fucosyllactose (2′-FL) [13]. Notably, 2′-FL, the most prevalent HMO, has been produced commercially and widely incorporated into infant formula [52].
Figure 2. Industrial enzymatic production of human milk oligosaccharides. Biosynthetic pathway of (a) 3′-sialylactose/6′-sialylactose and (b) 2′-fucosyllactose from glucose and lactose (Lac). Sugar nucleotides, such as cytidine 5′-monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-NeuAc) and guanosine diphosphate fucose (GDP-Fuc), are biosynthesized internally from glucose, and glycosyltransferases transfer the sugar moiety of the nucleotide sugar to lactose. (Reproduced with permission from [31]). Notes: GlcNAc: N-acetylglucosamine; ManNAc: N-acetylmannosamine; NeuNAc: N-acetylneuraminic acid; Man-6P: mannose 6-phosphate; Man-1P: mannose 1-phosphate; GDP-Man: guanosine pyrophosphate mannose.

2.2. Galacto-Oligosaccharides (GOSs)

GOSs consist of galactosyl oligomers typically terminating with lactose. Commercial GOS products, such as Vivinal® GOSs, Bimuno® GOSs, and Oligomate 55® GOSs, are produced via β-galactosidase (EC 3.2.1.23, from, e.g., Bacillus circulans, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Aspergillus oryzae)-catalyzed transgalactosylation of lactose [34,36]. As illustrated in Figure 3, GOS synthesis involves lactose hydrolysis, galactosyl–enzyme intermediate formation, and intra- and intermolecular transgalactosylation. The product yield and structures depend on the kinetic difference between hydrolysis and transgalactosylation, which are governed by reaction conditions (e.g., initial lactose concentration, temperature, water activity) and enzyme properties (hydrolytic activity and transferase activity) [53]. The resulting GOS mixtures exhibit diverse DP (usually 2 to 10) and glycosidic bonds (β-(1→6), β-(1→4), β-(1→3), β-(1→2), and also (1↔1)-linked non-reducing disaccharides (β-D-Galp-(1↔1)-α-D-Glcp and β-D-Galp-(1↔1)-β-D-Glcp)) [54]. Alternative dairy sources, like milk and whey permeates, have been utilized to enhance the GOS production economy [53,55]. A recent advance involves the chemical synthesis of GOSs via lactose hydrolysis and dehydrative glycosylation in concentrated sulfuric acid, generating potential prebiotic GOSs with novel α and β linkages [35].
Figure 3. Illustration of the enzymatic production of galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs) from lactose via hydrolysis and transgalactosylation reactions catalyzed by β-galactosidase (lactase). Note: DP—degree of polymerization.

2.3. Fructo-Oligosaccharides (FOSs)

FOSs consist of β-(2→1)-linked fructosyl chains terminating with sucrose. Commercial FOS production is well-established by major manufacturers (Actilight, Beneo, Meiji, NutraFlora) [37]. Two industrial processes yield structurally distinct FOSs (Figure 4). S-FOSs are produced via sucrose transfructosylation using fructosyltransferases (FTases), yielding exclusively GFn type FOSs (1-kestose (GF2), nystose (GF3), and fructosylnystose (GF4)) [56]. Recent research focuses on the heterologous expression of FTases from yeast and bacterial expression systems [57]. On the other hand, H-FOSs are generated through controlled inulin hydrolysis by endoinulinase, producing mixed GFn type and Fn type FOSs (such as inulobiose (F2), inulotriose (F3), and inulotetraose (F4)) [37,58]. H-FOSs exhibited broader DP distribution (from two to nine) and larger average DP (4.0) compared to S-FOSs (from two to four, average DP 3.6) [59]. In the lab, while acid hydrolysis (HCl/H2SO4) offers a simpler alternative for inulin hydrolysis: it generates undesired byproducts (fructose, 5-HMF) with low FOS selectivity [37].
Figure 4. Chemical structures of two commercial fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs) from different production methods. (A) S-FOSs produced from the enzymatic transglycosylation of sucrose; (B) H-FOSs produced from the controlled enzymatic hydrolysis of inulin (G and F denote glucose and fructose units, respectively. (Reproduced with permission from [56].)

2.4. Gluco-Oligosaccharides (GlcOSs)

GlcOSs comprise glucose oligomers with α/β-(1→6/4/3/2/1) glycosidic linkages. The predominant commercial GlcOSs are isomalto-oligosaccharides (IMOs), which are DP 2–6 GlcOSs with mainly α-(1→6) and α-(1→4) glycosidic bonds, marketed as ISOThrive nectar, Vitafiber, FiberYu, IMO-900, Wako IMOs, etc. [60]. As detailed in our recent review [40], industrial IMO production employs either (1) starch (corn, tapioca) processing via sequential liquefaction, hydrolysis, and transglycosylation using hydrolases and α-transglucosidase or (2) direct sucrose/maltose conversion via dextransucrase (EC 2.4.1.5)-catalyzed transglycosylation. A less common commercial GlcOS, gentio-oligosaccharides (GnOSs), consists of β-(1→6)-linked GlcOSs synthesized through β-glucosidase-mediated glucose reversion [61].
Recent advances in chemical synthesis have expanded the routes for producing prebiotic GlcOSs from glucose, maltose, and cellulose feedstocks. Dehydrative glycosylation of glucose in concentrated LiBr (61.7%), H2SO4 (≥72%), or H3PO4 (≥85%) yields short-chain GlcOSs (DP mostly 2–10) with diverse α/β-(1→6/4/3/2/1) linkages [62,63]. Recent advances in linkage-controllable GlcOS synthesis include zeolite-confined glucose glycosylation [64] and direct maltose glycosylation in unacidified LiBr [42]. Moreover, the production of β-(1→4)-linked cello-oligosaccharides (one type of GlcOS) from abundant cellulose resources is highly promising [65]. The key challenges involve the disruption of cellulose’s crystalline structure within weakly acidic solvents (nonacidified 61.7% LiBr (a.q.), essential for achieving selective cleavage of glycosidic bonds) [66,67] and controlled depolymerization to oligosaccharides (DP 4–11, 90.3% yield) while minimizing glucose formation [68]. To advance commercial viability, current research focuses on (1) developing efficient separation protocols for oligosaccharide recovery [69,70], (2) optimizing solvent systems for obtaining higher GlcOS concentration [71], and (3) employing combined hydrolysis and glycosylation to improve GlcOS solubility in water [72]. These methods have been explored on various lignocellulosic biomasses (e.g., birch, poplar, and corn stover) for GlcOS production, demonstrating potential for sustainable industrial production [45,73,74].

2.5. Other Prebiotic Oligosaccharides

Xylo-oligosaccharides (XOSs) are β-(1→4) linked xylose oligomers (DP typically 2–6), commercially produced from corncob xylan through alkaline extraction and controlled enzymatic hydrolysis by endo-1,4-xylanase. Recent efforts focus on utilizing abundant lignocellulosic biomass (e.g., wheat bran, cotton stalk, corn stover, sugarcane bagasse) as alternative feedstocks for XOS production [75,76]. The resulting XOSs maintain the β-(1→4) xylose backbone but may contain arabinose or ferulic acid substitutions, depending on the source material [77].
Chitosan oligosaccharides (COSs) are β-(1→4) linked glucosamine oligomers that are produced via chitin deacetylation and depolymerization processes. Acid hydrolysis (e.g., HCl, H3PO4), oxidative degradation, ultrasonic treatment, ultraviolet irradiation, and enzymatic hydrolysis (chitosanases, cellulases) are feasible for chitin depolymerization [47,48]. Deacetylation can be achieved using fungal-derived chitin deacetylase or chemically through a reaction in a concentrated alkaline solution (e.g., 50% NaOH) [78,79].
Agaro-oligosaccharides (AOSs) derive from agar (extracted from red algae) degradation via acid hydrolysis (HCl, H3PO4, citric acid, solid acids, trifluoroacetic acid), enzymatic hydrolysis (α/β-agarases), or microbial fermentation (e.g., Bacteroides uniformis NP1) [20]. AOSs contain two structural types: neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NAOSs) with α-1,3-linked-3,6-anhydro-L-galactose (L-AHG) termini and agaro-oligosaccharides (AOSs) with β-1,4-linked-D-galactose (D-Gal) termini.

5. Commercial Cosmetic Compositions Containing Prebiotic Oligosaccharides

An early patent described the addition of gluco-oligosaccharides (5% by weight, produced by the France company BIOEUROPE) in a series of cosmetic products, including liquid soap, shampoo, body milk (emulsion), face cream (emulsion), and vaginal gel [97]. The gluco-oligosaccharides were prepared from maltose and glucosyltransferase derived from the strain Leuconostoc mesenteroides NRLL B-1299, which produced α-(1→6)- and α-(1→2)-linked glucose oligomers with DP in the range of 3–7.
Ecoskin® (Solabia, Pantin, France) is a prebiotic and probiotic complex (in liquid form) formulated with two prebiotic oligosaccharides and probiotic Lactobacillus strains (L. casei and L. acidophilus, with a reported effective dose of 1–5% (w/w) [128]. The two prebiotic oligosaccharides were α-gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOSs), produced by enzymatic synthesis from plant substrates (α-glucan oligosaccharides), and β-fructo-oligosaccharides, prepared from Yacon tubers (Polymnia sonchifolia) via cold pressing [6]. This patented ingredient was reported to promote the growth and development of beneficial skin commensals and defend the skin from environmental pollutants (up to 2.5 μm) that accelerate aging [129].
Bioecolia® (Solabia, Pantin, France) is a prebiotic product (in powder form) containing α-glucan-oligosaccharides that are produced via enzymatic transglycosylation from saccharose (sucrose) and maltose [130]. Structurally, the α-glucan oligosaccharides are composed of glucose units linked by α-(1→6) and α-(1→2) glycosidic bonds. The specific linkage types allow bioselective, fast, and efficient metabolism of the prebiotic by skin microbes. Specifically, 0.1% Bioecolia® promoted the growth of commensal S. epidermidis MFP04 and marginally increased the cytotoxicity of S. epidermidis on HaCaT keratinocytes at 1.0% (not enhancing biofilm formation activity) [131]. Bioecolia® was patented for its use as a medication for the treatment of uncomfortable skin/external mucosa and vulvar dryness and/or pruritus and/or vulvar burns [132].
Glycolift® (Solabia, Pantin, France) is a tensing and firming agent containing alginate, α-glucan oligosaccharides, and plant propanediol. Glycolift® is used as an anti-aging tensor by optimizing rheological properties and forming a matrix for instant and prolonged tensing and smoothing action [133]. In addition, it also balances the skin microbiome and acts against atmospheric, UV, and domestic pollutants by forming a non-occlusive matrix. Glycolift® is formulated for facial tensing, reducing wrinkles, and radiant care.
Lancôme®, a luxury skincare brand owned by L’Oréal (Paris, France), offers facial serums, sheet masks, eye creams, etc. According to the product label, some Lancôme® products (e.g., facial serums, moisturizers) contain prebiotic α-glucan oligosaccharides that help support a healthy skin microbiome and reduce symptoms of sensitive skin [13]. Other oligosaccharides include trehalose as a moisturizer and maltodextrin as a stabilizer, binding agent, film-forming agent, and skin softener.
Aveeno® (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) is a clinically validated skincare brand that specializes in dry skin relief, offering products ranging from body washes to moisturizing lotion. Its FDA-approved active ingredient, prebiotic colloidal oatmeal, exhibits multiple benefits in cleansing, buffering, moisturizing, protecting, soothing, anti-irritant, antioxidant, and anti-inflammation properties [134]. Chemically, colloidal oatmeal consists of 65–85% starch, 15–20% protein, 3–11% lipid, 5% fiber, and 5% β-glucan [13]. The high concentrations of starch and β-glucans offer protective and water-holding functions through humectant and film-forming effects, and the presence of different types of phenols confers antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and UV-absorbing activities [134]. The anti-inflammatory properties, improvement in dry, irritated skin, and enhancement in skin barrier functions have been substantiated and discussed [84,114].

6. Conclusions and Future Prospects

This review comprehensively summarized multiple roles of prebiotic oligosaccharides in promoting skin health and their burgeoning applications in the cosmetic industry. Prebiotic oligosaccharides, including human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs), galacto-oligosaccharides (GOSs), fructo-oligosaccharides (FOSs), gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOSs), and others, have demonstrated significant potential in modulating the skin microbiota, thereby conferring a range of skin health benefits. These benefits encompass the promotion of beneficial skin commensals, the inhibition of pathogenic bacteria, anti-melanogenesis, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, wound healing, the prevention of atopic dermatitis and allergies, enhanced skin hydration, and anti-drying, anti-aging, and photoprotection properties. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are primarily attributed to the selective utilization of prebiotic oligosaccharides by beneficial skin microorganisms, leading to the production of metabolites, such as SCFAs, that modulate the skin environment and immune responses. Additionally, these oligosaccharides can directly inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria and exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects through various molecular pathways. The emerging understanding of the structure–function relationships of prebiotic oligosaccharides further highlights their potential for targeted skin health interventions.
Despite the promising findings, several challenges and future directions should be addressed before the practical application of prebiotic oligosaccharides as cosmetic formulations. First, the structure–function relationship of oligosaccharides requires deeper investigation to elucidate how molecular characteristics (monomer composition, DP, glycosidic linkages) dictate their biological activity. This would enable the rational design of novel oligosaccharides from green and sustainable feedstocks (e.g., cellulose, lignocellulosic biomass). Second, rigorous clinical trials are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of prebiotic oligosaccharides. More importantly, mechanistic studies should be devoted to fully understanding the skin–gut microbiota–host interactions and connection to skin health effects. Finally, it is essential to consider the regulatory requirements for cosmetic products and distinguish them from health products. For example, in Europe, cosmetic claim requirements should follow EU Regulation 1223/2009 and 655/2013, while health products should follow European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines. Standardized protocols should be established for the production and quality control of prebiotic oligosaccharides for application in the cosmetic industry.

Author Contributions

M.Z., conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation; Y.L., writing-review and editing; J.C., writing-review and editing; J.W., conceptualization and writing—review and editing; Q.L., conceptualization and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Sichuan Science and Technology Innovation Seedling Project (MZGC20240028), the Sichuan Pig Innovation Team of National Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (SCCXTD-2025-8), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22208111; 22378077), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2023A1515010064), and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2023QNRC001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data and materials are included in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Harris-Tryon, T.A.; Grice, E.A. Microbiota and maintenance of skin barrier function. Science 2022, 376, 940–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, Y.E.; Fischbach, M.A.; Belkaid, Y. Skin microbiota–host interactions. Nature 2018, 553, 427–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Flowers, L.; Grice, E.A. The skin microbiota: Balancing risk and reward. Cell Host Microbe 2020, 28, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Demessant-Flavigny, A.-L.; Connétable, S.; Kerob, D.; Moreau, M.; Aguilar, L.; Wollenberg, A. Skin microbiome dysbiosis and the role of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis in adults and children: A narrative review. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2023, 37, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Geoghegan, J.A.; Irvine, A.D.; Foster, T.J. Staphylococcus aureus and atopic dermatitis: A complex and evolving relationship. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 484–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fournière, M.; Latire, T.; Souak, D.; Feuilloley, M.G.J.; Bedoux, G. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes: Two major sentinels of skin microbiota and the influence of cosmetics. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakatsuji, T.; Chen, T.H.; Butcher, A.M.; Trzoss, L.L.; Nam, S.-J.; Shirakawa, K.T.; Zhou, W.; Oh, J.; Otto, M.; Fenical, W.; et al. A commensal strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis protects against skin neoplasia. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woolery-Lloyd, H.; Andriessen, A.; Day, D.; Gonzalez, N.; Green, L.; Grice, E.; Henry, M. Review of the microbiome in skin aging and the effect of a topical prebiotic containing thermal spring water. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baquerizo Nole, K.L.; Yim, E.; Keri, J.E. Probiotics and prebiotics in dermatology. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 814–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Notay, M.; Foolad, N.; Vaughn, A.R.; Sivamani, R.K. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for the treatment and prevention of adult dermatological diseases. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2017, 18, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sanders, M.E.; Merenstein, D.J.; Reid, G.; Gibson, G.R.; Rastall, R.A. Probiotics and prebiotics in intestinal health and disease: From biology to the clinic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 16, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gibson, G.R.; Hutkins, R.; Sanders, M.E.; Prescott, S.L.; Reimer, R.A.; Salminen, S.J.; Scott, K.; Stanton, C.; Swanson, K.S.; Cani, P.D.; et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Han, J.H.; Kim, H.S. Skin Deep: The Potential of Microbiome Cosmetics. J. Microbiol. 2024, 62, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Erginer Hasköylü, M.; Toksoy Öner, E. Chapter 16—Fructans in Personal Care Products. In The Book of Fructans; den Ende, W.V., Öner, E.T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 275–294. [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitriana, N.; Saksono, B.; Ermawar, R.A.; Wicaksono, M.W. Polysaccharide Applications in Cosmetic. In Biomass-Based Cosmetics: Research Trends and Future Outlook; Arung, E.T., Fatriasari, W., Kusuma, I.W., Kuspradini, H., Shimizu, K., Kim, Y.-u., Azelee, N.I.W., Edis, Z., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 273–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Baptista, S.; Freitas, F. Bacterial Polysaccharides: Cosmetic Applications. In Polysaccharides of Microbial Origin: Biomedical Applications; Oliveira, J., Radhouani, H., Reis, R.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rahman, T.; Sarwar, P.F.; Potter, C.; Comstock, S.S.; Klepac-Ceraj, V. Role of human milk oligosaccharide metabolizing bacteria in the development of atopic dermatitis/eczema. Front. Pediatr. 2023, 11, 1090048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, L.; Cao, X.; Chen, S.; Jiang, X.; Li, D.; Chen, G. Dietary Galacto-oligosaccharides Ameliorate Atopic Dermatitis-like Skin Inflammation and Behavioral Deficits by Modulating Gut Microbiota–Brain–Skin Axis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 7954–7968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, S.; Kang, B.-G.; Sa, S.; Park, S.Y.; Ryu, K.; Lee, J.; Park, B.; Kwon, M.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; et al. Advanced fructo-oligosaccharides improve itching and aberrant epidermal lipid composition in children with atopic dermatitis. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 15, 1383779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jiang, C.; Cheng, D.; Liu, Z.; Sun, J.; Mao, X. Advances in agaro-oligosaccharides preparation and bioactivities for revealing the structure-function relationship. Food Res. Int. 2021, 145, 110408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, L.; Yu, S.; Guan, Y.; Wang, D.; Yang, J.; Li, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, F. Dual intervention on the gut and skin microbiota attenuates facial cutaneous aging. Food Funct. 2024, 15, 4246–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lv, X.; Han, Z.; Huo, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Chi, J.; Han, B.; Jiang, Z. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant succinyl-chitosan oligosaccharide protects human epidermal cell and mouse skin against ultraviolet B-induced photodamage. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 351, 123102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shao, L.; Li, T.; Yang, S.; Ma, L.; Cai, B.; Jia, Q.; Jiang, H.; Bai, T.; Li, Y. The prebiotic effects of fructooligosaccharides enhance the growth characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis and enhance the inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2025, 47, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hong, Y.H.; Chang, U.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Jung, E.Y.; Suh, H.J. Dietary galacto-oligosaccharides improve skin health: A randomized double blind clinical trial. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 26, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Hong, K.-B.; Hong, Y.H.; Jung, E.Y.; Jo, K.; Suh, H.J. Changes in the Diversity of Human Skin Microbiota to Cosmetic Serum Containing Prebiotics: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Pers. Med. 2020, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Iglesia, S.; Kononov, T.; Zahr, A.S. A multi-functional anti-aging moisturizer maintains a diverse and balanced facial skin microbiome. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 133, 1791–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kong, S.-Z.; Li, D.-D.; Luo, H.; Li, W.-J.; Huang, Y.-M.; Li, J.-C.; Hu, Z.; Huang, N.; Guo, M.-H.; Chen, Y.; et al. Anti-photoaging effects of chitosan oligosaccharide in ultraviolet-irradiated hairless mouse skin. Exp. Gerontol. 2018, 103, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kano, M.; Masuoka, N.; Kaga, C.; Sugimoto, S.; Iizuka, R.; Manabe, K.; Sone, T.; Oeda, K.; Nonaka, C.; Miyazaki, K.; et al. Consecutive intake of fermented milk containing Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult and galacto-oligosaccharides benefits skin condition in healthy adult women. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2013, 32, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Suh, M.G.; Hong, Y.H.; Jung, E.Y.; Suh, H.J. Inhibitory effect of galactooligosaccharide on skin pigmentation. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 24, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bergandi, L.; Flutto, T.; Valentini, S.; Thedy, L.; Pramotton, R.; Zenato, S.; Silvagno, F. Whey Derivatives and Galactooligosaccharides Stimulate the Wound Healing and the Function of Human Keratinocytes through the NF-kB and FOXO-1 Signaling Pathways. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urashima, T.; Ajisaka, K.; Ujihara, T.; Nakazaki, E. Recent advances in the science of human milk oligosaccharides. BBA Adv. 2025, 7, 100136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Li, B. Recent trends in human milk oligosaccharides: New synthesis technology, regulatory effects, and mechanisms of non-intestinal functions. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2025, 24, e70147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wei, X.; Leilei, Y.; Jianxin, Z.; Qixiao, Z.; Wei, C.; Tian, F. Human Milk Microbiota and Oligosaccharides: Origin, Structure, Impact Factors, and Benefits for Infant Health. Food Rev. Int. 2025, 41, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, K.; Duan, F.Y.; Sun, T.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, L.L. Galactooligosaccharides: Synthesis, metabolism, bioactivities and food applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6160–6176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zeng, M.; Mohapatra, S.; Oh, J.-H.; Astmann, T.; van Pijkeren, J.-P.; Pan, X. Novel galacto-oligosaccharides from lactose: Chemical synthesis, structural characterization, and in vitro assessment of prebiotic activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 14031–14045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ambrogi, V.; Francesca, B.; Linqiu, C.; Bas, K.; Margriet, S.; van Sinderen, D. Galacto-oligosaccharides as infant prebiotics: Production, application, bioactive activities and future perspectives. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 753–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sanchez-Martinez, M.J.; Soto-Jover, S.; Antolinos, V.; Martinez-Hernandez, G.B.; Lopez-Gomez, A. Manufacturing of Short-Chain Fructooligosaccharides: From Laboratory to Industrial Scale. Food Eng. Rev. 2020, 12, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, G.T.; Vasconcelos, Q.; Aragao, G.F. Fructooligosaccharides on inflammation, immunomodulation, oxidative stress, and gut immune response: A systematic review. Nutr. Rev. 2022, 80, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nobre, C.; Simões, L.S.; Gonçalves, D.A.; Berni, P.; Teixeira, J.A. 5—Fructooligosaccharides production and the health benefits of prebiotics. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Rai, A.K., Singh, S.P., Pandey, A., Larroche, C., Soccol, C.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 109–138. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zeng, M.; van Pijkeren, J.-P.; Pan, X. Gluco-oligosaccharides as potential prebiotics: Synthesis, purification, structural characterization, and evaluation of prebiotic effect. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2023, 22, 2611–2651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Goffin, D.; Delzenne, N.; Blecker, C.; Hanon, E.; Deroanne, C.; Paquot, M. Will isomalto-oligosaccharides, a well-established functional food in Asia, break through the European and American market? The status of knowledge on these prebiotics. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 394–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Qiu, X.; Tang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Q. Structure-Tunable Glucan Oligomer Production from Glucose and Disaccharide Glycosylation in an Unacidified LiBr·3.2H2O Molten Salt Hydrate. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 4743–4753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Q.; Zhou, L.; Xie, X.; Fan, D.; Ouyang, X.; Fan, W.; Qiu, X. Enhanced production and separation of short-chain glucan oligomers from corn stover in an unacidified LiBr molten salt hydrate via pre-extraction of hemicellulose. Green. Chem. 2022, 24, 8812–8819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, Q.; Lin, J.; Guan, M.; Liang, H.; Liu, Q. Enhanced cello-oligosaccharides production from cellulose hydrolysis in molten salt hydrate over lignin-based hyper-cross-linked polymer (LHCP) adsorption. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2022, 644, 118808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xie, X.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, X.; Liu, Q.; Qiu, X. Cascade fractionation of birch into xylose, glucan oligomers, and noncondensed lignin improved using microwave assistance and molten salt hydrates. Green. Chem. 2023, 25, 9272–9281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kumar, R.; Næss, G.; Sørensen, M. Xylooligosaccharides from lignocellulosic biomass and their applications as nutraceuticals: A review on their production, purification, and characterization. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2024, 104, 7765–7775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Benchamas, G.; Huang, G.; Huang, S.; Huang, H. Preparation and biological activities of chitosan oligosaccharides. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 107, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, B.; Cui, J.; Xu, T.; Xu, Y.; Long, M.; Li, J.; Liu, M.; Yang, T.; Du, Y.; Xu, Q. Advances in the preparation, characterization, and biological functions of chitosan oligosaccharide derivatives: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2024, 332, 121914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Long, J.; Ye, Z.; Li, X.; Tian, Y.; Bai, Y.; Chen, L.; Qiu, C.; Xie, Z.; Jin, Z.; Svensson, B. Enzymatic preparation and potential applications of agar oligosaccharides: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 5818–5834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zheng, L.-X.; Liu, Y.; Tang, S.; Zhang, W.; Cheong, K.-L. Preparation methods, biological activities, and potential applications of marine algae oligosaccharides: A review. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Duman, H.; Bechelany, M.; Karav, S. Human Milk Oligosaccharides: Decoding Their Structural Variability, Health Benefits, and the Evolution of Infant Nutrition. Nutrients 2024, 17, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lordan, C.; Roche, A.K.; Delsing, D.; Nauta, A.; Groeneveld, A.; MacSharry, J.; Cotter, P.D.; Sinderen, D.v. Linking human milk oligosaccharide metabolism and early life gut microbiota: Bifidobacteria and beyond. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2024, 88, e0009423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fischer, C.; Kleinschmidt, T. Synthesis of galactooligosaccharides in milk and whey: A review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 678–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Logtenberg, M.J.; Donners, K.M.; Vink, J.C.; van Leeuwen, S.S.; de Waard, P.; de Vos, P.; Schols, H.A.J.J.o.a. Touching the high complexity of prebiotic vivinal galacto-oligosaccharides using porous graphitic carbon ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7800–7808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Miao, M.; Li, S.; Yang, S.; Yan, Q.; Xiang, Z.; Jiang, Z. In Situ Galacto-Oligosaccharides Synthesis in Whey Powder Fortified Milk by a Modified β-Galactosidase and Its Effect on the Techno-Functional Characteristics of Yogurt. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 26431–26440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, S.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, X. Investigation of dietary fructooligosaccharides from different production methods: Interpreting the impact of compositions on probiotic metabolism and growth. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 69, 103955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rawat, H.K.; Suresh, N.; Isha, S.; Kango, N. Recent developments in the production of prebiotic fructooligosaccharides using fungal fructosyltransferases. Mycology 2024, 15, 564–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jackson, P.P.J.; Wijeyesekera, A.; Rastall, R.A. Inulin-type fructans and short-chain fructooligosaccharides—Their role within the food industry as fat and sugar replacers and texture modifiers—What needs to be considered! Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kolida, S.; Gibson, G.R. The prebiotic effect: Review of experimental and human data. In Handbook of Prebiotics; Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 87–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Palaniappan, A.; Emmambux, M.N. The challenges in production technology, health-associated functions, physico-chemical properties and food applications of isomaltooligosaccharides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 3821–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Liang, X.; Tao, Z.; Xia, W.; Chen, S.; Wu, J. Gentiooligosaccharides. In Biomanufacture of Functional Carbohydrates; Wu, J., Su, L., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, N.; Wang, Z.; Qu, T.; Kraft, J.; Oh, J.-H.; van Pijkeren, J.-P.; Huber, G.W.; Pan, X. High-yield synthesis of glucooligosaccharides (GlOS) as potential prebiotics from glucose via non-enzymatic glycosylation. Green. Chem. 2019, 21, 2686–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zeng, M.; Li, N.; Astmann, T.; Oh, J.-H.; van Pijkeren, J.-P.; Pan, X. Facile and efficient chemical synthesis of gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOS) with diverse glycosidic linkages as potential prebiotics to promote the growth of probiotic bacteria. Food Res. Int. 2023, 165, 112436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liang, H.; Ye, S.; Liu, Q.; Fan, W.; Ma, Q. Confined synthesis of glucan oligomers from glucose in zeolites. Green. Chem. 2025, 27, 1714–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, P.; Shrotri, A.; Fukuoka, A. Synthesis of cello-oligosaccharides by depolymerization of cellulose: A review. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2021, 621, 118177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zeng, M.; Pan, X. Insights into solid acid catalysts for efficient cellulose hydrolysis to glucose: Progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Catal. Rev. 2022, 64, 445–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pang, Z.; Li, N.; Dong, C.; Ji, H.; Liao, Y.; Yang, G.; Pan, X. Insights into the dissolution of cellulose in lithium bromide solution. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 7, 100522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, Q.; Ma, Q.; Sabnis, S.; Zheng, W.; Vlachos, D.G.; Fan, W.; Li, W.; Ma, L. Production of high-yield short-chain oligomers from cellulose via selective hydrolysis in molten salt hydrates and separation. Green. Chem. 2019, 21, 5030–5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, Q.; Luo, S.; Fan, W.; Ouyang, X.; Qiu, X. Separation of short-chain glucan oligomers from molten salt hydrate and hydrolysis to glucose. Green. Chem. 2021, 23, 4114–4124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zeng, M.; Pan, X. Purification and fractionation of cellooligosaccharides synthesized from controlled cellulose hydrolysis by sulfuric acid using nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 348, 127800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Q.; Zhou, L.; Fan, D.; Guan, M.; Ma, Q.; Li, S.; Ouyang, X.; Qiu, X.; Fan, W. Adsorption-Enhanced Glucan Oligomer Production from Cellulose Hydrolysis over Hyper-Cross-Linked Polymer in Molten Salt Hydrate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 52082–52091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hirayama, J.; Kobayashi, H.; Fukuoka, A. Amorphization and Semi-Dry Conversion of Crystalline Cellulose to Oligosaccharides by Impregnated Phosphoric Acid. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2020, 93, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Xie, X.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, Q.; Ouyang, X.; Qiu, X. Fractionation of High-Yield Noncondensed Lignin and Glucan Oligomers from Lignocellulose in a Novel Biphasic System. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 2880–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xie, X.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, X.; Liu, Q.; Qiu, X. Rapid fractionation of noncondensed lignin from birch via acidified LiCl molten salt hydrates. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 207, 117744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Amorim, C.; Silverio, S.C.; Prather, K.L.J.; Rodrigues, L.R. From lignocellulosic residues to market: Production and commercial potential of xylooligosaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Santibanez, L.; Henriquez, C.; Corro-Tejeda, R.; Bernal, S.; Armijo, B.; Salazar, O. Xylooligosaccharides from lignocellulosic biomass: A comprehensive review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ríos-Ríos, K.L.; Dejonghe, W.; Vanbroekhoven, K.; Rakotoarivonina, H.; Rémond, C. Enzymatic Production of Xylo-oligosaccharides from Destarched Wheat Bran and the Impact of Their Degree of Polymerization and Substituents on Their Utilization as a Carbon Source by Probiotic Bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 13217–13226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Qing, L.; Gao, J.; Du, L.; Liu, Y.; Guo, N.; Sun, J.; Dong, H.; Mao, X. Chitinase and Deacetylase-Based Chitin-Degrading Bacteria: One-Pot Cascade Bioconversion of Chitin to Chitooligosaccharides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 23937–23946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sun, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, J.; Wei, Q.; Ren, X. Study on the deacetylation and mechanism of chitin in natural deep eutectic solvent. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 255, 127698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Mortaz, E.; Nomani, M.; Adcock, I.; Folkerts, G.; Garssen, J. Galactooligosaccharides and 2′-fucosyllactose can directly suppress growth of specific pathogenic microbes and affect phagocytosis of neutrophils. Nutrition 2022, 96, 111601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Petrov, A.; Ćorović, M.; Milivojević, A.; Simović, M.; Banjanac, K.; Pjanović, R.; Bezbradica, D. Prebiotic effect of galacto-oligosaccharides on the skin microbiota and determination of their diffusion properties. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2022, 44, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Le Bourgot, C.; Meunier, C.; Gaio, E.; Murat, V.; Micheletto, M.; Tedesco, E.; Benetti, F. Effects of short chain fructo-oligosaccharides on selected skin bacteria. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Akiyama, H.; Oono, T.; Huh, W.K.; Yamasaki, O.; Akagi, Y.; Uemura, H.; Yamada, T.; Iwatsuki, K. Actions of gluco-Oligosaccharide against Staphylococcus aureus. J. Dermatol. 2002, 29, 580–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Liu-Walsh, F.; Tierney, N.K.; Hauschild, J.; Rush, A.K.; Masucci, J.; Leo, G.C.; Capone, K.A. Prebiotic Colloidal Oat Supports the Growth of Cutaneous Commensal Bacteria Including S. epidermidis and Enhances the Production of Lactic Acid. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 14, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kim, S.-H.; Eom, S.-H.; Yu, D.; Lee, M.-S.; Kim, Y.-M. Oligochitosan as a potential anti-acne vulgaris agent: Combined antibacterial effects against Propionibacterium acnes. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 26, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Di Lodovico, S.; Gasparri, F.; Di Campli, E.; Di Fermo, P.; D’Ercole, S.; Cellini, L.; Di Giulio, M. Prebiotic Combinations Effects on the Colonization of Staphylococcal Skin Strains. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Fournière, M.; Bedoux, G.; Souak, D.; Bourgougnon, N.; Feuilloley, M.G.J.; Latire, T. Effects of Ulva sp. Extracts on the Growth, Biofilm Production, and Virulence of Skin Bacteria Microbiota: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Cutibacterium acnes Strains. Molecules 2021, 26, 4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Jung, S.Y.; Han, J.Y.; Heo, H.; Lee, S.M.; Brito, S.; Cha, B.; Lei, L.; Lee, S.H.; Bin, B.-H.; Lee, M.-G.; et al. A Study on Melanin Reduction through Autophagy by 2′-Fucosyllactose. J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci. Korea 2022, 48, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Heo, H.; Cha, B.; Jang, D.; Park, C.; Park, G.; Kwak, B.-M.; Bin, B.-H.; Park, J.-H.; Lee, M.-G. Human milk oligosaccharide 2′-fucosyllactose promotes melanin degradation via the autophagic AMPK–ULK1 signaling axis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yun, E.J.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, B.B.; Kim, H.T.; Lee, S.H.; Pelton, J.G.; Kang, N.J.; Choi, I.-G.; Kim, K.H. Enzymatic production of 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose from agarose and its purification and in vitro skin whitening and anti-inflammatory activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 2961–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, J.H.; Yun, E.J.; Yu, S.; Kim, K.H.; Kang, N.J. Different levels of skin whitening activity among 3,6-Anhydro-l-galactose, agarooligosaccharides, and neoagarooligosaccharides. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jo, E.; Gajanayaka, N.D.; Bandara, M.S.; Marasinghe, S.D.; Park, G.-H.; Lee, S.-J.; Oh, C.; Lee, Y. Odd-Numbered Agaro-Oligosaccharides Produced by α-Neoagaro-Oligosaccharide Hydrolase Exert Antioxidant Activity in Human Dermal Fibroblasts. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kim, M.; Jang, J.-K.; Park, Y.-S. Production Optimization, Structural Analysis, and Prebiotic- and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Gluco-Oligosaccharides Produced by Leuconostoc lactis SBC001. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Yeung, Y.K.; Kang, Y.-R.; So, B.R.; Jung, S.K.; Chang, Y.H. Structural, antioxidant, prebiotic and anti-inflammatory properties of pectic oligosaccharides hydrolyzed from okra pectin by Fenton reaction. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 118, 106779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hajjar, R.; Oliero, M.; Cuisiniere, T.; Fragoso, G.; Calvé, A.; Djediai, S.; Annabi, B.; Richard, C.S.; Santos, M.M. Improvement of colonic healing and surgical recovery with perioperative supplementation of inulin and galacto-oligosaccharides. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 3842–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Noreen, S.; Bernkop-Schnürch, A. Thiolated Poly- and Oligosaccharide-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering and Wound Healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2310129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jean-Pierre, H.G.; Lamothe, T.; Yves, G.; Marchenay, B.; Pierre, F.; Monsan, B.; Paul, F.M.B.; Pelenc, V. Cosmetic Compositions Containing Oligosaccharides. U.S. Patent 5518733A, 21 May 1996. [Google Scholar]
  98. Jiao, Q.; Zhi, L.; You, B.; Wang, G.; Wu, N.; Jia, Y. Skin homeostasis: Mechanism and influencing factors. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2024, 23, 1518–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Kamilijiang, M.; Abudukelimu, N.; Bakri, M.; Zang, D.; Xu, N.; Zhao, J.; Aisa, H.A. Anti-melanogenic effect of a novel oligosaccharide derived from almond on forskolin-stimulated melanogenesis in B16F10 melanoma cells. Food Biosci. 2024, 62, 105013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Vieira, T.F.; Corrêa, R.C.G.; Peralta, R.A.; Peralta-Muniz-Moreira, R.F.; Bracht, A.; Peralta, R.M. An Overview of Structural Aspects and Health Beneficial Effects of Antioxidant Oligosaccharides. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020, 26, 1759–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Franco-Robles, E.; López, M.G. Implication of fructans in health: Immunomodulatory and antioxidant mechanisms. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 289267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cao, R.; Wang, B.; Bai, T.; Zhu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, J. Structural and functional impacts of glycosylation-induced modifications in rabbit myofibrillar proteins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 283, 137583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Van den Ende, W.; Peshev, D.; De Gara, L. Disease prevention by natural antioxidants and prebiotics acting as ROS scavengers in the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Guerreiro, I.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P. Prebiotics as functional ingredients: Focus on Mediterranean fish aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2018, 10, 800–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Lee, Y.H.; Verma, N.K.; Thanabalu, T. Prebiotics in atopic dermatitis prevention and management. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 78, 104352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kim, J.-H.; Baek, J.; Sa, S.; Park, J.; Kih, M.; Kim, W. Kestose-enriched fructo-oligosaccharide alleviates atopic dermatitis by modulating the gut microbiome and immune response. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 85, 104650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gao, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, F. Alginate oligosaccharide-mediated butyrate-HIF-1α axis improves skin aging in mice. J. Pharm. Anal. 2024, 14, 100911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dall’Oglio, F.; Milani, M.; Micali, G. Effects of oral supplementation with FOS and GOS prebiotics in women with adult acne: The “S.O. Sweet” study: A proof-of-concept pilot trial. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 11, 445–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ferreira, P.G.; Ferreira, V.F.; da Silva, F.d.C.; Freitas, C.S.; Pereira, P.R.; Paschoalin, V.M.F. Chitosans and Nanochitosans: Recent Advances in Skin Protection, Regeneration, and Repair. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Ruxton, C.H.S.; Jenkins, G. A novel topical ingredient derived from seaweed significantly reduces symptoms of acne vulgaris: A general literature review. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2013, 64, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  111. Hong, K.-B.; Jeong, M.; Han, K.S.; Hwan Kim, J.; Park, Y.; Suh, H.J. Photoprotective effects of galacto-oligosaccharide and/or Bifidobacterium longum supplementation against skin damage induced by ultraviolet irradiation in hairless mice. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 66, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Miyazaki, K.; Masuoka, N.; Kano, M.; Iizuka, R. Bifidobacterium fermented milk and galacto-oligosaccharides lead to improved skin health by decreasing phenols production by gut microbiota. Benef. Microbes 2014, 5, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Berardesca, E.; Abril, E.; Serio, M.; Cameli, N. Effects of topical gluco-oligosaccharide and collagen tripeptide F in the treatment of sensitive atopic skin. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2009, 31, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Michelle Garay, M.; Judith Nebus, M.; Menas Kizoulis, B. Antiinflammatory activities of colloidal oatmeal (Avena sativa) contribute to the effectiveness of oats in treatment of itch associated with dry, irritated skin. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2015, 14, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  115. Suh, M.G.; Bae, G.Y.; Jo, K.; Kim, J.M.; Hong, K.-B.; Suh, H.J. Photoprotective Effect of Dietary Galacto-Oligosaccharide (GOS) in Hairless Mice via Regulation of the MAPK Signaling Pathway. Molecules 2020, 25, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kim, D.; Lee, K.R.; Kim, N.R.; Park, S.-J.; Lee, M.; Kim, O.-K. Combination of Bifidobacterium longum and Galacto-Oligosaccharide Protects the Skin from Photoaging. J. Med. Food 2021, 24, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Han, K.; Hong, K.-B.; Ahn, Y.; Jo, K.; Jung, J.; Suh, H.J. Effects of Collagen-Tripeptide and Galacto-oligosaccharide Mixture on Skin Photoaging Inhibition in UVB-exposed Hairless Mice. Photochem. Photobiol. 2022, 98, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Li, Z.; Jiang, R.; Jing, C.; Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Sun, L.; Zhao, D. Protective effect of oligosaccharides isolated from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer against UVB-induced skin barrier damage in BALB/c hairless mice and human keratinocytes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 283, 114677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Deleuran, M.; Dézfoulian, B.; Elberling, J.; Knutar, I.; Lapeere, H.; Lossius, A.H.; Schuttelaar, M.L.A.; Stockman, A.; Wikström, E.; Bradley, M.; et al. Systemic anti-inflammatory treatment of atopic dermatitis during conception, pregnancy and breastfeeding: Interdisciplinary expert consensus in Northern Europe. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2024, 38, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Ordnung, M.; Mank, M.; Stahl, B.; Kurz, D.; Marosvölgyi, T.; Decsi, T.; Rothenbacher, D.; Genuneit, J.; Siziba, L.P. Potential sex differences in human milk fatty acids and their association with atopic dermatitis: Results of the Ulm SPATZ health study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2023, 34, e13992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Han, S.M.; Binia, A.; Godfrey, K.M.; El-Heis, S.; Cutfield, W.S. Do human milk oligosaccharides protect against infant atopic disorders and food allergy? Nutrients 2020, 12, 3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zuurveld, M.; van Witzenburg, N.P.; Garssen, J.; Folkerts, G.; Stahl, B.; van’t Land, B.; Willemsen, L.E.M. Immunomodulation by Human Milk Oligosaccharides: The Potential Role in Prevention of Allergic Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Brosseau, C.; Selle, A.; Palmer, D.J.; Prescott, S.L.; Barbarot, S.; Bodinier, M. Prebiotics: Mechanisms and Preventive Effects in Allergy. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Niedźwiedzka, A.; Micallef, M.P.; Biazzo, M.; Podrini, C. The Role of the Skin Microbiome in Acne: Challenges and Future Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Podwojniak, A.; Tan, I.J.; Sauer, J.; Neubauer, Z.; Rothenberg, H.; Ghani, H.; Parikh, A.K.; Cohen, B. Acne and the cutaneous microbiome: A systematic review of mechanisms and implications for treatments. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2025, 39, 793–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cong, T.-X.; Hao, D.; Wen, X.; Li, X.-H.; He, G.; Jiang, X. From pathogenesis of acne vulgaris to anti-acne agents. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2019, 311, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sugawara, T.; Kikuchi, K.; Tagami, H.; Aiba, S.; Sakai, S. Decreased lactate and potassium levels in natural moisturizing factor from the stratum corneum of mild atopic dermatitis patients are involved with the reduced hydration state. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2012, 66, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ecoskin®. Pre/Postbiotic to Reveal the Radiance of the Complexion. Available online: https://www.solabia.com/cosmetics/fr/produit/ecoskin/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  129. Stout, H.S.; Murphy, K.A. Skin Rejuvenation and Defense Systems and Methods. U.S. Patent 10485752B2, 26 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  130. Bioecolia®. Prebiotic Protector of the Microbiota. Available online: https://www.solabia.com/cosmetics/fr/produit/bioecolia/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  131. Hillion, M. Interactions Peau/Microbiote Cutané: Étude du Microbiote Cutané Cultivable et Influence de Produits Cosmétiques sur la Virulence Bactérienne. Apports de la Technique de Spectrométrie de Masse MALDI-TOF. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Rouen, Évreux, France, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  132. Benita, G.; Cornu, P. Compositions Based on Prebioitcs and Extracts of Orchioid Curculigo and Uses Thereof. France Patent FR3009962A1, 28 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  133. Glycolift®. Anti-Aging Tensor. Available online: https://www.solabia.com/cosmetics/product/glycolift/ (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  134. Ellen, S.; Kurtz, W.W. Colloidal oatmeal: History, chemistry and clinical properties. J. Drugs Dermatol. 2007, 6, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.