Next Article in Journal
Antioxidant Protection against Trastuzumab Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary Guanidine Acetic Acid Improves Ruminal Antioxidant Capacity and Alters Rumen Fermentation and Microflora in Rapid-Growing Lambs
Previous Article in Journal
Mitochondrial-Targeted Antioxidant MitoQ-Mediated Autophagy: A Novel Strategy for Precise Radiation Protection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dietary Protected Sodium Butyrate and/or Olive Leaf and Grape-Based By-Product Supplementation Modifies Productive Performance, Antioxidant Status and Meat Quality in Broilers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/antiox12020456
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Dietary Amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) Supplemented with Enzyme Blend on Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Antioxidant Status in Laying Hens

by
Hossein Janmohammadi
1,
Babak Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad
1,
Majid Oliyai
1,
Sadegh Alijani
1,
Ivan Fedorovich Gorlov
2,
Marina Ivanovna Slozhenkina
2,
Aleksandr Anatolievich Mosolov
2,
Lourdes Suarez Ramirez
3,
Alireza Seidavi
4,
Vito Laudadio
5,
Vincenzo Tufarelli
5,*,† and
Marco Ragni
6,†
1
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 51666-16471, Iran
2
Volga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat-and-Milk Production, 400131 Volgograd, Russia
3
Department of Animal Pathology, Animal Production, Bromatology and Food Technology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35412 Arucas, Spain
4
Department of Animal Science, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht 41335-3516, Iran
5
Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Jonian Area, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Valenzano, 70010 Bari, Italy
6
Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, 70126 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(2), 456; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020456
Submission received: 19 January 2023 / Revised: 6 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Antioxidants and Animal Nutrition)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A feeding trial was performed to assess the effects of dietary raw amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) grain (RAG), with or without an enzyme blend, on the productive performance, blood biochemistry, and antioxidant status in laying hens. The trial was conducted following a completely randomized design by factorial method, including five levels of RAG (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40%, respectively) and two levels of enzyme blend (0 −E and 0.025 +E %). A total of 960 White Leghorn (Hy-line W-36) laying hens (56 weeks of age) were divided into 10 groups with eight repetitions, including 12 birds. The trial period was ten weeks. Results showed that RAG levels in feed (>10%) led to a significant decrease in blood total cholesterol (TC), but they also significantly decreased feed conversion ratio (FCR) (p ˂ 0.05) as measured by feed intake (FI), hen daily production (HDP), egg weight (EW), and mass (EM), leading to overall worse productivity compared to the control group. On the contrary, the addition of the enzyme blend led to an improvement in the investigated production traits (p ˂ 0.05), with the exception of HDP. The enzyme blend was also capable of recovering productive performance when combined with low concentrations of RAG (10%) (p ˂ 0.05), and RAG × enzyme blend groups showed the lowest values of TC (p ˂ 0.05). Moreover, the interaction effects for atherogenic index (LDL/HDL) indicated a significant and promising reduction in response to the addition of RAG both in the presence and absence of the enzyme blend (p ˂ 0.05), and this additive also significantly reduced levels of egg yolk cholesterol (p ˂ 0.05). In summary, the evidence gathered in this trial showed that dietary RAG had positive effects on egg quality characteristics, leading to the production of low-cholesterol eggs, and, at the same time, it may improve the health status of laying hens. Furthermore, the addition of an enzyme blend allowed feeding up to 10% RAG in the diet, leading to an optimal balance between animal productivity and the beneficial effects of RAG.

1. Introduction

Food safety is a crucial component of the national security of countries, and the increasing demand for healthy nutrition requires innovative solutions encompassing the whole agri-food sector. In the poultry sector, recent research has established that the quality of meat and eggs for human consumption can be improved, for example, with novel feed formulations that may include supplements with beneficial effects for animal health and productivity [1,2,3]. The use of alternative cereals such as amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) is an option for innovative poultry feeding, allowing to maintain performance and improving animal health, ultimately leading to the production of healthier products such as eggs and meat with low cholesterol [4,5]. A recent report by WHO [6] suggested that the use of amaranth, which is classified among the Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS), could be a sustainable and low-cost solution for agriculture, with many applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries [7,8].
The genus Amaranthus comprises 75 species of dicotyledonous pseudo-cereals in group C4, 11 of which grow in Iran [9,10,11] (Gamel et al., 2007, Ghahremaninejad and Hoseini, 2015; Mozaffariam, 2020). Amaranth has a similar energy content to common cereals, but it is also very rich in other nutrients, especially essential amino acids, making it very advantageous for human and animal diets [7,9,12,13,14]. The presence of bioactive compounds in grains, such as squalene, tocopherols, and phytosterols, makes this plant useful as poultry feed [12,15,16,17,18]. Many studies on the nutritional value of amaranth in human and animal nutrition have been reported since the 1980s, and its use has increased in the last decade [19].
The inclusion of raw, autoclaved, pelleted, and extruded amaranth grains in the diet of broilers, laying hens, quails, and turkeys, and the evaluation of production performance and other health-related parameters indicated the potential use in poultry nutrition [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Moreover, a review of the literature showed that the use of amaranth determined a reduction in blood fats and cholesterol in mice, hamsters, rabbits, as well as in poultry [27,28,29,30,31]. Additionally, Punita and Chaturvedi [32] reported that the use of amaranth (raw or processed) at 25% in the diet of laying hens led to the production of eggs with low triglycerides and cholesterol, and with higher levels of linoleic acid. Recently, Rodriguez-Rios et al. [26] studied the effect of dietary amaranth in laying hens and concluded that concentrations up to 15% did not affect production parameters. However, due to the presence of some compounds such as saponins, tannins, phytic acid, oxalate, protease inhibitors, nitrates, and phytohemagglutinins in amaranth, it is necessary to use exogenous enzymes to reduce their negative effects on bird performance and health [33,34,35,36].
The available literature showed that the use of enzymes in poultry nutrition not only improved feed efficiency, but also allowed nutritionists to use unconventional feeds, which are cheaper and more available [37]. Indeed, the use of enzyme blend in poultry feed can improve the digestibility of nutrients, and can support the performance of laying hens [38,39]. Recently, Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad et al. [40] showed that feeding up to 20% of processed amaranth with enzymes in laying hens led to an improvement in egg mass and weight and feed efficiency, while also reducing egg yolk cholesterol. In addition, bird health parameters, including blood lipid profile and antioxidant status, were improved by feeding amaranth with enzymes. The same authors provided information on using raw amaranth, which is abundant in many countries; however, the available literature on its use in laying hens is still scarce.
Building upon the successful and promising experiences of using enzyme additives in cereals, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of raw amaranth grains with or without enzyme blend in laying hen diets. Furthermore, the bioactive compounds content of raw amaranth grains and the effects of various dietary inclusion levels on hens’ productive performance, blood parameters, and antioxidant status, as well as on egg quality, were assessed.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Animals and Diets

All the procedures followed in present research aimed to minimize pain or discomfort of the laying hens and were confirmed by the Ethic, Care, and Use Committee of Animals of the Tabriz University. A total of 960 Hy-Line W-36 White Leghorns (56 weeks of age) were assigned to ten dietary treatments with eight replicates having twelve hens in three separate cages of (41 × 23 × 43 cm) with four birds per cage, in a 5 × 2 factorial arrangement by completely randomized design. The dietary treatments consisted of five levels of raw amaranth grain (RAG; 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40%, respectively) with or without enzyme blend addition (0 and 0.025%, respectively), as reported in Table 1. Before starting the feeding trial, egg production of birds was recorded for each individual, and laying hens with equal egg production were allotted in each replication. Hen body weight (BW) and mortality rate were recorded during the 10 weeks of trial duration. Diets were formulated on the basis of linear programming using the UFFDA (User-friendly Feed Formulation, Done Again) software and according to the catalog of Leghorn hens’ requirements (Table 2). Feed and water were offered ad libitum, and lighting program and temperature rearing conditions followed the recommendations of the Hy-line W-36 White Leghorn laying hens.

2.2. Test Ingredients

Raw amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) grains were supplied by Darvash Giah Khazar medicinal herbs complex company (Ltf) (Gilan, Rasht, Iran), after a preliminary analysis of grain chemical composition as reported in our previous studies [8,41] (Hosseintabar-Ghasmabad et al., 2020, Janmohammadi et al., 2022). In order to complete the nutritional analyses of amaranth, in the present study, squalene (method IOC, 2011) and phytosterols [42,43] (Takatsuto and Abe, 1992; Bhandari et al., 2012) were determined via gas chromatography (model 6100, Younglin, Republic of Korea), while tocopherols were evaluated by RP-HPLC (Younglin Acme 9000 model, Republic of Korea) and a dual-channel fluorescence detector (Jasco FP-4025 model, Japan), as reported in Table 3. The enzyme blend used in this trial was Natuzyme P50 (Bioproton Pty Ltf., Sunny bank, QLD, Australia). Enzyme constituents and their respective activity (U/g) per kilogram of diet were as follows: xylanase 107, cellulase 5 × 106, pectinase 5 × 104, and β-glucanase 106, which is of Trichoderma reesei of fungal origin, and it included Trichoderma longibachiatum and α-amylase from Bacillus subtilis, and protease 6 × 106 and phytase 5 × 105 from Aspergillus niger.

2.3. Sampling and Analyses

During the feeding trial, daily feed intake (FI), egg weight (EW), egg mass (EM), hen-day production (HDP), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and Haugh unit were measured. The FI was assessed daily during the trial period, and weekly feed consumption was calculated by subtracting left-over feed from the quantity supplied to laying hens. Separately, the produced eggs were collected and counted daily from each replicate, and EW was recorded. HDP was calculated as total number of eggs collected divided by total number of live hens per day in each group. EM was calculated as per hen per day by multiplying HDP by EW. At the end of the feeding trial, the FCR was calculated as FI/EM.
In order to evaluate the egg quality traits (shell thickness, shell strength, shape index), nine eggs from each replicate were collected for a total of 720 eggs and assessed 24 h after egg collection. Shell strength was measured by a specific instrument (Digital Egg shell force Gauge; Wagner Instruments, Bridgeport, CT, USA). Shell thickness was measured at three locations (air cell, equator, and sharp end) with a digital micrometer instrument (Mitutoyo, Japan). Yolk diameter (D) of all eggs was measured using a compass (Model: Swordfish, Tokyo, Japan), and height of yolk (HY) was measured using a tripod digital micrometer instrument (Model: Mituoyo, Kawasaki, Japan). Yolk index was calculated as [HY/D] ×100, and Haugh unit was calculated as 100 log HA + 7.57 − 1.7 EW 0.37, where the HA, HY, and EW were albumen height, yolk height, and egg weight, respectively. Moreover, to determine yolk cholesterol content, at the end of the trial period, six eggs from each replicate, for a total of 480 eggs, were transferred to lab and stored at −80 °C for further analysis, as described by Baghban-Kanani et al. [34], after separating the yolk from the albumen. At the end of the trial, six hens from each replicate were randomly selected to collect blood samples from the wing vena. Blood samples were stored in additive-free blood tubes, transferred to lab, and then centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm at 20 °C to obtain plasma for analysis. Plasma samples were used to determine triglycerides (TGs), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), malondialdehyde (MDA), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) using commercial diagnostic kits (enzymatic method) [44]. All samples were subsequently stored at −85 °C in lab for further analysis. TGs were measured using colorimetric enzyme procedure, and HDL and TC were measured using enzymatic photometric method [45,46]. The atherogenic index was calculated as the LDL/HDL ratio. MDA and TAC activities were determined in plasma samples using RANDOX kits (Germany), according to manufacturer instructions. Plasma lipid peroxidation (LP) was determined according to Kei et al. [47] method using 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane standard and based method of the reaction between thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and MDA. The absorbance rate of produced solution was determined spectrophotometrically (V-1201, Shimadzu, Japan) at 532 nm. The plasma lipid peroxidation (LP) values in terms of MDA were expressed as nmol/mL plasma [44,48].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using a completely randomized design as the factorial arrangement with R Software [49]. In order to assess normal and independent distribution, all random errors were homogenized of variance using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Bartlett’s test. Mean differences were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test [50] (Duncan, 1955), and values were expressed as means ± standard error of the means (SEM).

3. Results and Discussion

The characterization of bioactive phytochemicals in amaranth grains, shown in Table 3, shows the abundance of different types of phytosterols and tocopherols and, subsequently, the outstanding presence of squalene, which makes amaranth unique compared to other edible plants. The occurrence of such compounds in food sources indicates the value of superior nutrients, and at the same time, consumers can benefit from the potential benefits of this source to improve health and reduce oxidative stress. The presence of these bioactive compounds and their effects has been reported in other studies by Ogrodowska et al. [51], Tang and Tsao [12], Iftikhar and Khan [52], and Waisundara [53], demonstrating the beneficial effects and the high value of amaranth grain as food or feed.
The findings related to the productive performance of laying hens (Table 4) showed that the main effect of including a high level of RAG in diet determined a decrease in FI and an increase in FCR (p ˂ 0.05). Moreover, increasing RAG levels determined a significant decrease in HDP, EW, and EM (p ˂ 0.05), but the main effect of enzyme addition led to improved productive performance parameters (p ˂ 0.05). The interaction effects indicated that with increasing levels of RAG, the decrease in egg production was significant, but an improvement was observed with the addition of the enzyme blend (p ˂ 0.05). Feeding RAG up to 10% with enzyme blend supplementation led to similar performance to the control group. These results are consistent with the findings of Tillman and Waldroup [54], who reported that the use of amaranth grain at 10, 20, and 30% of the diet of laying hens led to a decrease in FI, but despite the refusal of feed in amaranth diets, no significant variations were observed in daily weight gain or the health status of hens; moreover, feed efficiency was also improved. The same researchers attributed the decrease in FI in birds fed more than 20% of amaranth to the presence of phenolic compounds and saponins in raw amaranth grain [55]. In addition, our results were in line with those of Popiela et al. [23], who reported that the consumption of amaranth grain at 5 and 10% of the diet did not significantly influence the FI of laying hens. It was observed by Pedersen et al. [56] that a high level of lignin in the amaranth cortex was negatively correlated with energy and digestibility, and decreased the bioavailability of nutrients. Decreased FI in laying hens fed high levels of amaranth in their diet could be attributed to increased dietary fiber and non-nutrients, decreased palatability, bitter matter, and less tendency of birds to consume diets [57]. This will increase the availability of important nutrients such as starch, protein, and minerals within the cell walls rich in crude fiber. The observed result of HDP reduction at high levels of amaranth was in contrast to the previous results of Tillman and Waldroup [54], who reported that levels of 10 and 20% of dietary amaranth led to increased HDP. Moreover, at a 30% inclusion level, the same researchers did not observe a decrease in egg production. Perhaps one of the reasons for this difference was the use of extruded processed amaranth grain. Popiela et al. [23] reported that a 5% level consumption of amaranth grain could improve HDP, which was inconsistent with the results of this study, but at 10%, the same researchers reported a decrease in HDP that was in line with our study. Additionally, the increase in EW and HDP reported by Tillman and Waldroup [54] could be attributed to the use of processed amaranth grain and to the presence of linoleic acid, which differed from the results of the present study. The decrease in egg production when fed more than 20% of processed amaranth with or without enzymes was observed recently by Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad et al. [40], who similarly used raw amaranth with or without enzymes. Many studies demonstrated that the efficacy of enzyme blends on laying-type poultry performance, as well as the improvement in EW and EM, was due to the fact that enzymes can lead to reduced concentrations of antinutritional factors and NSP [34,58], and viscosity [59] in edible plants such as amaranth. The use of enzyme blends also improved the activity of lipase and chymotrypsin enzymes in the gut, enhancing the digestibility of nutrients [60] and metabolizable energy [41]. It seems that this set of factors led to improved poultry performance [34,61].
The results shown in Table 5 indicate that at the end of the feeding period, egg quality traits, including shell thickness and strength, shape index, and Haugh unit, were not significantly affected by diets, considering both the main and interaction effects; however, with increasing consumption of RAG in diet, the main and interaction effects showed a significant decrease of 7 to 12% in yolk cholesterol compared to control (p ˂ 0.05). This was in line with the results of Punita and Chaturvedi [32] reporting that the use of raw or processed amaranth at 25% in hens’ diet can reduce yolk cholesterol. These researchers assessed that high amounts of fiber, as well as the presence of squalene in amaranth, led to increased hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme (HMG-CoA) reductase activity, which helps prevent cholesterol deposition in egg yolk. Furthermore, the presence of a high level of linoleic acid in amaranth grains led to the excretion of bile acids, lowering cholesterol levels. Many edible plants and even their by-products, including amaranth, due to the presence of fiber, phenolic compounds, as well as bioactive compounds, can also increase cholesterol-lowering effects without adverse effects on the performance and health status of poultry [36,40,44]. Reklewska et al. [62] reported a decrease in yolk cholesterol using amaranth in laying hen diets, which is in line with the present study. Conversely, Escudero et al. [63] argued that the protein fraction of amaranth grain contains a relatively high amount of fiber, which can lead to anti-cholesterol effects. Several mechanisms have been reported for the effect of amaranth on the reduction in yolk cholesterol. In general, the liver and ovary are the primary sites of cholesterol biosynthesis in laying hens, and the liver is the main site of fat synthesis in the egg yolk. Given that amaranth grains have been proven to be a rich source of squalene, tocopherols, and tocotrienols, they can play an important role in cholesterol biosynthesis. Squalene is an unsaturated triterpene containing 30 polyprenyl carbons; it is structurally similar to beta-carotene, and it is well known as an intermediate of cholesterol synthesis. Squalene and its precursors, including oxidosqualene and bis-oxidosqualene, can be the precursors of 200 triterpenes, which can play many important roles in the body. Squalene in feed can reach the liver with the help of chylomicrons and is used to make steroids and bile acids. Bile acids (colic and deoxycholic) are made from squalene-synthesized cholesterol in liver cells and can combine with glycine and taurine to produce bile salts which have hypocholesterolemic effects in the body. Lower egg cholesterol has a positive correlation with lower cholesterol in the blood and liver [64]. Therefore, any factor that lowers blood cholesterol can lead to a decrease in yolk cholesterol, seeing how a five percent inhibition of HMC-CoA reductase activity leads to a two percent decrease in blood serum cholesterol. Due to the rate of bile secretion in laying hens, which is about 1 mL per kg of body weight per hour, the process of lowering blood cholesterol due to increased turnover of bile acids led to a decrease in egg yolk cholesterol. Feeding of amaranth can also bind cholesterol to bile acids and increase the fermentation effect on the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), preventing the formation of micelles [40]. The cholesterol-lowering potential of amaranth, reviewed by Peiretti [19], supported the hypothesis that this plant may be successfully used in livestock nutrition to produce high-quality products.
The effects of feeding RAG and enzyme blend on blood parameters of laying hens are reported in Table 6. The findings of the main effects of RAG showed no significant differences in hens’ blood triglyceride (TG) and LDL (p > 0.05); however, blood total cholesterol (TC) and atherogenic index in all groups fed RAG decreased significantly compared to the control diet. Moreover, blood HDL showed an increase with increasing levels of RAG in diet (p ˂ 0.05). The main effect of enzyme supplementation was effective on blood TC (p ˂ 0.05). The interaction effects showed that RAG without enzyme blend had determined a significant reduction in blood cholesterol at concentrations higher than 10% compared to the control group, whereas including the enzyme blend in the RAG diets led to the lowest blood cholesterol levels (p ˂ 0.05). In addition, regarding blood LDL, only the diet with 40% RAG without enzyme showed the lowest value (p ˂ 0.05). The results of interaction effects for blood HDL indicated that consuming RAG with or without enzyme blend led to higher HDL levels than the control group (p ˂ 0.05). The output of results of the mutual effects on atherogenic index showed that this index was able to show a significant and promising reduction in response to the addition of RAG with or without enzymes (p ˂ 0.05).
Previous studies showed that amaranth can play a key role in reducing blood cholesterol in both animals and humans due to the amounts of unsaturated fatty acids, the abundance of squalene, and the high amount of phytosterols and tocopherols it contains [65,66]. In a study, Qureshi et al. [27] reported that supplementing the diet of broilers with grains from two Amaranthus species (Amaranthus hypochondriacus and Amaranthus cruentus) led to a 10–30% of reduction in blood cholesterol. The LDL levels showed up to 40% of reduction, which was consistent with the results in blood cholesterol and LDL in the present study. The aforementioned researchers also demonstrated that the activation of 7-alpha hydroxylase enzyme led to the formation of bile acids from cholesterol and increased the catabolism and excretion of cholesterol. The authors assessed that the dietary feed source containing isoprenoids, while having squalene, tocotrienols, tocopherols, crude fiber, and saponin, can effectively reduce the activity of HMG-CoA enzyme, leading to a significant reduction in blood cholesterol in chickens fed amaranth grains. Lehmann et al. [67] confirmed that feeding of tocopherol and tocotrienols, gamma, and zeta tocotrienols identified in amaranth grain played a role in reducing blood cholesterol. Mendonça et al. [28] and Soares et al. [29] reported that consumption of amaranth grain can reduce cholesterol in hamster blood by 48%. They also stated that when squalene is provided through feed consumption, a certain amount is converted into cholesterol, but such synthesis does not lead to an increase in cholesterol levels. These researchers attributed the decrease in blood cholesterol of hamsters fed amaranth grain to the presence of peptides that limited the production of the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme. However, there are several reports assessing the role of squalene in reducing blood cholesterol [40]. In a study, Janevski et al. [68] observed that total and LDL cholesterol in mice consuming cholesterol-rich food decreased significantly after injection with 3.5 mg of squalene, due to changes in gene expression. Farvin et al. [69] demonstrated that dietary squalene can have beneficial effects on blood pressure and hypercholesterolemia by keeping cholesterol and lipoprotein levels at normal levels. Recently, Leukebandara et al. [70] observed a decrease in blood cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides by feeding raw and heat-treated amaranth grain in lactating goats.
The presence of sufficient amounts of methionine in amaranth may increase the production of lecithin in the liver, also leading to a decrease in cholesterol and liver fat [71]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the tocopherols in amaranth grain may potentially reduce the synthesis of cholesterol, LDL, and lipoprotein lipase enzyme, and finally regulate and reduce cholesterol [12,27,72,73,74]. In addition, the presence of specific phytochemical compounds in amaranth grain, such as 20-hydroxyacidisone (20HE), can lead to anti-obesity effects in terms of reduction in triglycerides, cholesterol, and LDL in mice [12,75]. An investigation conducted by Króliczewska et al. [76] on blood parameters in laying hens showed that supplementing up to 10% of diets with amaranth (A. cruentus) led to the significant reduction in blood lipid parameters, which was in agreement with the present study. Conversely, Popiela et al. [23] did not observe any reduction in cholesterol and other blood lipid parameters in laying hens fed with amaranth, and the reason was probably due to the use of low amaranth grain levels (5 and 10%). Furthermore, several reports have also demonstrated that the presence and role of carbohydrate enzymes (such as pectinase, cellulase, furyl-esterase, and glucanase) led to the release of phenolic compounds in amaranth grain, which can indirectly play an effective role in reducing cholesterol and in improving blood lipid parameters [12,30,77].
Investigation of laying hens’ blood antioxidant status, in terms of total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), indicated that the main effect of RAG and enzyme as well as their interaction exhibited no differences without any negative effect (p > 0.05). Considering the breeding of laying hens in a cage system and the possible stress conditions in this type of rearing system, there was a fluctuation in blood antioxidant status; therefore, the use of feed sources such as amaranth may improve the antioxidant capacity of birds. In a previous study, Longato et al. [78] reported a significant decrease in serum lipid peroxidation level by feeding Amaranthus caudatus grain to broiler chickens at 0, 5, and 10% of amaranth, which was in disagreement with the findings of the present study. Alvarez et al. [79] found that the presence of phytosterol bioactive compounds, tocopherols, and squalene had a significant role in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, reducing the risks of oxidative stress and also improving the consumer’s health. Moreover, vitamin E homologs, having an antioxidant effect, are particularly concentrated in amaranth grains compared to other grains, which can positively regulate physiological and metabolic processes [12,80,81,82,83]. The experimental diets in the present study did not show any negative effects on the blood antioxidant status of laying hens.

4. Conclusions

According to the findings of the present feeding trial, the consumption of raw amaranth grain had no negative effect on egg production and quality, mainly due to the abundance of phytosterol and tocopherol bioactive compounds on raw amaranth grains, along with the presence of squalene, leading to an improvement in the health parameters of birds, in terms of their blood lipid profile and antioxidant status. Moreover, a significant reduction in egg yolk cholesterol by feeding amaranth may be considered a valuable option for consumers’ choices. Thus, the use of RAG up to 10% along with enzyme blend addition can be recommended as an acceptable practical proposal for the poultry industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.J., B.H.-G. and A.S.; methodology, M.O., B.H.-G., I.F.G., M.I.S., A.A.M. and V.L.; formal analysis, H.J., B.H.-G. and S.A.; investigation, H.J., B.H.-G., M.O., A.S. and S.A.; visualization, V.L, A.S., V.T. and M.R.; validation, V.L, A.S., I.F.G., V.T., L.S.R. and M.R.; data curation, H.J., V.L, A.S. and V.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.J., B.H.-G., and A.S.; writing—review and editing, V.L, A.S., V.T., L.S.R. and M.R.; funding acquisition, A.S., V.L. and V.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was part of the Ph.D thesis of the first author, and the authors would like to thank MSc. GH. Hosseintabar, the manager of Darvash Giah Khazar Medicinal Herbs Complex, for technical and financial support, and also for their valuable assistance in this research project. The research study was conducted with the aid of a grant of the RSF No. 22-16-00041 NIIMMP.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Tabriz, Iran (Protocol Code: IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1396.2820) (Date of approval “9 July 2017”).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tufarelli, V.; Passantino, L.; Zupa, R.; Crupi, P.; Laudadio, V. Suitability of dried olive pulp in slow-growing broilers: Performance, meat quality, oxidation products, and intestinal mucosa features. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Grigore, D.-M.; Mironeasa, S.; Ciurescu, G.; Ungureanu-Iuga, M.; Batariuc, A.; Babeanu, N.E.E. Carcass Yield and Meat Quality of Broiler Chicks Supplemented with Yeasts Bioproducts. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; De Marzo, D.; Dimuccio, M.M.; Bozzo, G.; Tufarelli, V.; Losacco, C.; Ragni, M. Aloe vera: A Sustainable Green Alternative to Exclude Antibiotics in Modern Poultry Production. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jimoh, M.O.; Afolayan, A.J.; Lewu, F.B. Suitability of Amaranthus species for alleviating human dietary deficiencies. South Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dizyee, K.; Baker, D.; Herrero, M.; Burrow, H.; McMillan, L.; Sila, D.N.; Rich, K.; Csiro, S.L. The promotion of amaranth value chains for livelihood enhancement in East Africa: A systems modelling approach. Afr. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2020, 15, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. World Health Organization. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2018: Building Climate Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition, Box 14: Enhancing the Contribution of Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS) to Food Security and Income; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018; p. 99. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aderibigbe, O.R.; Ezekiel, O.O.; Owolade, S.O.; Korese, J.K.; Sturm, B.; Hensel, O. Exploring the potentials of underutilized grain amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) along the value chain for food and nutrition security: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Janmohammadi, H.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Amirdahri, S.; Gorlov, I.F.; Vladimirovna, K.E.; Slozhenkina, M.I.; Bilal, R.M.; Seidavi, A.; Phillips, C.J.C. The Energy Value for Broiler Chickens of Heat-Treated and Untreated Amaranth Grain, with and without Enzyme Addition. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gamel, T.H.; Mesallam, A.S.; Damir, A.A.; Shekib, L.A.; Linssen, J.P. Ccharacterization of amaranth seed oils. J. Food Lipids 2007, 14, 323–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ghahremaninejad, F.; Hoseini, E. Identification of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Iran, Valiollah Mozaffarian; Farhang Moaser Publishers: Tehran, Iran; ISBN 978-600-1050-31-2.
  11. Mozaffarian, V. Medicinal and Aromatic Plants of Gilan; Farhang Ilia Publishers: Gilan (Rasht), Iran, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tang, Y.; Tsao, R. Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential health beneficial effects: A review. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1600767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coelho, L.M.; Silva, P.M.; Martins, J.T.; Pinheiro, A.C.; Vicente, A.A. Emerging opportunities in exploring the nutritional/functional value of amaranth. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5499–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, N.; Singh, P.; Shevkani, K.; Virdi, A.S. Amaranth: Potential source for flour enrichment. In Flour and Breads and Their Fortification in Health and Disease Prevention; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cai, Y.; Corke, H.; Wu, H. Amaranth. In Encyclopedia of Grain Science; Wrigley, C.W., Corke, H., Walker, C.E., Eds.; Elsevier; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Corke, H.; Cai, Y.Z.; Wu, H.X. Amaranth: Overview. In Reference Module in Food Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 287–296. [Google Scholar]
  17. Alegbejo, J.O. Nutritional Value and Utilization of Amaranthus (Amaranthus spp.)–A Review. Bayero J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2014, 6, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kurek, M.A.; Karp, S.; Wyrwisz, J.; Niu, Y. Physicochemical properties of dietary fibres extracted from gluten-free sources: Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) and millet (Panicum miliaceum). Food Hydrocoll. 2018, 85, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peiretti, P.G. Amaranth in animal nutrition: A review. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 2018, 30, 88. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ravindran, V.; Hood, R.L.; Gill, R.J.; Kneale, C.R.; Bryden, W.L. Nutritional evaluation of grain amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) in broiler diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 63, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jacob, J.P.; Noll, S.L.; Brannon, J.A. Comparison of Metabolic Energy Content of Organic Cereal Grains for Chickens and Turkeys. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2008, 17, 540–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jakubowska, M.; Gardzielewska, J.; Tarasewicz, Z.; Szczerbinska, D.; Karamucki, T.; Rybak, K.; Polawska, E.; Garczewska, J. The effect of amaranth seed added to the standard diet upon selected meat quality traits in the quail. Anim. Sci. Rep. 2013, 31, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
  23. Popiela, E.; Króliczewska, B.; Zawadzki, W.; Opaliński, S.; Skiba, T. Effect of extruded amaranth grains on performance, egg traits, fatty acids composition, and selected blood characteristics of laying hens. Livest. Sci. 2013, 155, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Szczerbinska, D.; Pyka, B.; Szabelska, E.; Ligocki, M.; Majewska DRomaniszyn, K.; Sulik, M. The effect of diet with amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) seeds on Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) performance, somatic development, hatching results and selected blood biochemical parameters. Vet. Med. Zootech. 2015, 70, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peiretti, P.G.; Meineri, G.; Gai, F.; Longato, E.; Amarowicz, R. Antioxidative activities and phenolic compounds of pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) seeds and amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) grain extracts. Nat. Prod. Res. 2017, 31, 2178–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rodríguez-Ríos, H.; Campos-Parra, J.; Astudillo-Neira, R.; Grande-Cano, J.; Carrillo-Domínguez, S.; Pérez Gil-Romo, F. Amaranthus cruentus L. as a food alternative in laying hens to reduce cholesterol in eggsamaranthus cruentus L. como alternativa alimentaria en gallina sponedoras para disminuir el colesterol en huevos. Chil. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 2020, 36, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qureshi, A.; Lehmann, J.W.; Peterson, D.M. Amaranth and its oil inhibit cholesterol biosynthesis in 6-week-old female chickens. J. Nutr. 1996, 126, 1972–1978. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Mendonça, S.; Saldiva, P.H.; Cruz, R.J.; Arêas, J.A. Amaranth protein presents cholesterol-lowering effect. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 738–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Soares, R.A.M.; Mendonça, S.; De Castro, L.Í.A.; Menezes, A.C.C.C.C.; Arêas, J.A.G. Major Peptides from Amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus) Protein Inhibit HMG-CoA Reductase Activity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4150–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Tang, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, P.X.; Zhang, B.; Liu, R.; Hernandez, M.; Draves, J.; Marcone, M.F.; Tsao, R. Assessing the Fatty Acid, Carotenoid, and Tocopherol Compositions of Amaranth and Quinoa Seeds Grown in Ontario and Their Overall Contribution to Nutritional Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sánchez-Urdaneta, A.B.; Montero-Quintero, K.C.; González-Redondo, P.; Molina, E.A.; Bracho-Bravo, B.; Moreno-Rojas, R. Hypolipidemic and Hypoglycaemic Effect of Wholemeal Bread with Amaranth (Amaranthus dubius Mart. ex Thell.) on Sprague Dawley Rats. Foods 2020, 9, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Punita, A.; Chaturvedi, A. Effect of feeding crude red palm oil (Elaeis guineensis) and grain amaranth (Amaranthus paniculatus) to hens on total lipids, cholesterol, PUFA levels and acceptability of eggs. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 2000, 55, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Reyes, M.F.; Chávez-Servín, J.L.; Gonzalez-Coria, C.; Mercado-Luna, A.; Carbot, K.; Aguilera-Barreyro, A.; Ferriz-Martinez, R.; Serrano-Arellano, J.; Garcia-Gasca, T. Comparative account of phenolics, antioxidant capacity, α-tocopherol and anti-nutritional factors of Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) grown in the greenhouse and open field. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 2428–2436. [Google Scholar]
  34. Baghban-Kanani, P.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Seidavi, A.; Ayaşan, T.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Effect of different levels of sunflower meal and multi-enzyme complex on performance, biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of laying hens. South Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 48, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Karamać, M.; Gai, F.; Longato, E.; Meineri, G.; Janiak, M.A.; Amarowicz, R.; Peiretti, P.G. Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Composition of Amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) during Plant Growth. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tufarelli, V.; Baghban-Kanani, P.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Slozhenkina, M.; Gorlov, I.; Seidavi, A.; Ayaşan, T.; Laudadio, V. Effects of Horsetail (Equisetum arvense) and Spirulina (Spirulina platensis) Dietary Supplementation on Laying Hens Productivity and Oxidative Status. Animals 2021, 11, 335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jabbar, A.; Tahir, M.; Alhidary, I.A.; Abdelrahman, M.A.; Albadani, H.; Khan, R.U.; Selvaggi, M.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Impact of Microbial Protease Enzyme and Dietary Crude Protein Levels on Growth and Nutrients Digestibility in Broilers over 15–28 Days. Animals 2021, 11, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baghban-Kanani, P.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Seidavi, A.; Laudadio, V.; Mazzei, D.; Tufarelli, V. Effect of dietary sesame (Sesame indicum L) seed meal level supplemented with lysine and phytase on performance traits and antioxidant status of late-phase laying hens. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tufarelli, V.; Baghban-Kanani, P.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Slozhenkina, M.; Gorlov, I.; Viktoronova, F.M.; Seidavi, A.; Laudadio, V. Effect of dietary flaxseed meal supplemented with dried tomato and grape pomace on performance traits and antioxidant status of laying hens. Anim. Biotechnol. 2022, 33, 1525–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Janmohammadi, H.; Hosseinkhani, A.; Amirdahri, S.; Baghban-Kanani, P.; Gorlov, I.F.; Slozhenkina, M.I.; Mosolov, A.A.; Ramirez, L.S.; Seidavi, A. Effects of Using Processed Amaranth Grain with and without Enzyme on Performance, Egg Quality, Antioxidant Status and Lipid Profile of Blood and Yolk Cholesterol in Laying Hens. Animals 2022, 12, 3123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Janmohammadi, H.; Hosseinkhani, A.; Alijani, S.; Oliyai, M. Determination of Chemical Composition and Apparent Metabolizable Energy Corrected for Nitrogen (AMEn) Content of Amaranth Grain with and without Enzyme in Adult Leghorn Roosters by Regression Method. Iran J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2020, 10, 705–716. [Google Scholar]
  42. Takatsuto, S.; Abe, H. Sterol Composition of the Strobilus of Equisetum arvense L. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1992, 56, 834–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhandari, S.R.; Park, S.-K.; Cho, Y.-C.; Lee, Y.-S. Evaluation of phytonutrients in Adlay (Coix lacrymajobi L.) seeds. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 1872–1878. [Google Scholar]
  44. Baghban-Kanani, P.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Seidavi, A.; Ragni, M.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Effects of Using Artemisia annua Leaves, Probiotic Blend, and Organic Acids on Performance, Egg Quality, Blood Biochemistry, and Antioxidant Status of Laying Hens. J. Poult. Sci. 2019, 56, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Deeg, R.; Ziegenhorn, J. Kinetic enzymic method for automated determination of total cholesterol in serum. Clin. Chem. 1983, 29, 1798–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baghban-Kanani, P.; Janmohammadi, H.; Ostadrahimi, A. Effect of different levels of sunflower meal and niacin on performance, biochemical parameters, antioxidant status, and egg yolk cholesterol of laying hens. Iran J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 9, 737–746. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kei, S. Serum lipid peroxide in cerebrovascular disorders determined by a new colorimetric method. Clin. Chim. Acta 1978, 90, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Feshanghchi, M.; Baghban-Kanani, P.; Kashefi-Motlagh, B.; Adib, F.; Azimi-Youvalari, S.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Slozhenkina, M.; Gorlov, I.; Zangeronimo, M.G.; Swelum, A.A.; et al. Milk Thistle (Silybum marianum), Marine Algae (Spirulina platensis) and Toxin Binder Powders in the Diets of Broiler Chickens Exposed to Aflatoxin-B1: Growth Performance, Humoral Immune Response and Cecal Microbiota. Agriculture 2022, 12, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; The R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  50. Duncan, D.B. Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests. Biometrics 1955, 11, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ogrodowska, D.; Zadernowski, R.; Czaplicki, S.; Derewiaka, D.; Wronowska, B. Amaranth Seeds and Products–The Source of Bioactive Compounds. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2014, 64, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Iftikhar, M.; Khan, M. Amaranth. In Bioactive Factors and Processing Technology for Cereal Foods; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 217–232. [Google Scholar]
  53. Waisundara, V.Y. Nutritional Value of Amaranth. BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tillman, P.; Waldroup, P. Effects of Feeding Extruded Grain Amaranth to Laying Hens. Poult. Sci. 1987, 66, 1697–1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tillman, P.; Waldroup, P. Performance and Yields of Broilers Fed Extruded Grain Amaranth and Grown to Market Weight. Poult. Sci. 1988, 67, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pedersen, B.; Knudsen, K.E.B.; Eggum, B.O. The nutritive value of amaranth grain (Amaranthus caudatus). Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1990, 40, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Venskutonis, P.R.; Kraujalis, P. Nutritional Components of Amaranth Seeds and Vegetables: A Review on Composition, Properties, and Uses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 381–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bedford, M.R. The evolution and application of enzymes in the animal feed industry: The role of data interpretation. Br. Poult. Sci. 2018, 59, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kiarie, E.; Romero, L.; Ravindran, V. Growth performance, nutrient utilization, and digesta characteristics in broiler chickens fed corn or wheat diets without or with supplemental xylanase. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 1186–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bedford, M.R.; Classen, H.L. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is affected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. J. Nutr. 1992, 122, 560–569. [Google Scholar]
  61. Crouch, A.N.; Grimes, J.L.; Ferket, P.R.; Thomas, L.N.; Sefton, A.E. Enzyme Supplementation to Enhance Wheat Utilization in Starter Diets for Broilers and Turkeys. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1997, 6, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reklewska, B.; Nalecz-Tarwacka, T.; Niemiec, J.; Karaszewska, A. Yolk triacylglycerol composition and egg quality following the diet containing amaranth meal. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 1995, 13, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  63. Escudero, N.L.; De Arellano, M.L.; Luco, J.; Giménez, M.S.; Mucciarelli, S.I. Comparison of the Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Amaranthus cruentus Flour and Its Protein Concentrate. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2004, 59, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Mine, Y. Egg Bioscience and Biotechnology; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  65. Hilou, A.; Nacoulma, O.; Guiguemde, T. In vivo antimalarial activities of extracts from Amaranthus spinosus L. and Boerhaavia erecta L. in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 103, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Roy, S.; Sadhana, P.; Begum, M.; Kumar, S.; Lodha, M.; Kapoor, H. Purification, characterization and cloning of antiviral/ribosome inactivating protein from Amaranthus tricolor leaves. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1865–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lehmann, J.W.; Putnam, D.H.; Qureshi, A.A. Vitamin E isomers in grain amaranths (Amaranthus spp.). Lipids 1994, 29, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Janevski, M.; McGlynn, M.; Lewandowski, P. Squalene supplementation alters genes associated with liver cholesterol metabolism. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 15, S105. [Google Scholar]
  69. Farvin, K.; Surendrara, A.; Anandan, R. Protective Effect of Squalene on Endogenous Antioxidant Vitamins in Experimentally Induced Myocardial Infarction in Rats. Asian J. Biochem. 2009, 4, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Leukebandara, I.K.; Premaratne, S.; Sivakanesan, R.; Madugith, T.; Wimalasiri, S.; Sivananthawerl, P. Effect of Feeding Amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) Seeds on Blood Serum Parameters and Body Weights in Lactating Saanen Goats. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 4, 57–65. [Google Scholar]
  71. Min, Y.; Liu, F.; Qi, X.; Ji, S.; Ma, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y. Effects of methionine hydroxyl analog chelated zinc on laying performance, eggshell quality, eggshell mineral deposition, and activities of Zn-containing enzymes in aged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2018, 97, 3587–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Schnetzler, K.A.; Breene, W. Food uses and amaranth product research: A comprehensive review. In Amaranth Biology, Chemistry and Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  73. León-Camacho, M.; González, D.G.; Aparicio, R. A detailed and comprehensive study of amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) oil fatty profile. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2001, 213, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Santiago, P.; Tenbergen, K.; Vélez-Jiménez, E.; Cardador-Martínez, M. Functional attributes of amaranth. Austin J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 2, 6. [Google Scholar]
  75. Foucault, A.-S.; Mathé, V.; Lafont, R.; Even, P.; Dioh, W.; Veillet, S.; Tomé, D.; Huneau, J.-F.; Hermier, D.; Quignard-Boulangé, A. Quinoa Extract Enriched in 20-Hydroxyecdysone Protects Mice From Diet-Induced Obesity and Modulates Adipokines Expression. Obesity 2012, 20, 270–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Króliczewska, B.; Zawadzki, W.; Bartkowiak, A.; Skiba, T. The level of selected blood indicators of laying hens fed with addition of amaranth grain. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. 2008, 11, 18–22. [Google Scholar]
  77. Acosta-Estrada, B.A.; Gutiérrez-Uribe, J.A.; Serna-Saldívar, S.O. Bound phenolics in foods, a review. Food Chem. 2014, 152, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Longato, E.; Meineri, G.; Peiretti, P.G. The effect of Amaranthus caudatus supplementation to diets containing linseed oil on oxidative status, blood serum metabolites, growth performance and meat quality characteristics in broilers. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2017, 35, 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  79. Alvarez-Jubete, L.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ju, J.; Picinich, S.C.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Suh, N.; Kong, A.-N.; Yang, C.S. Cancer-preventive activities of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 533–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Joana Gil-Chávez, G.; Villa, J.A.; Fernando Ayala-Zavala, J.; Basilio Heredia, J.; Sepulveda, D.; Yahia, E.M.; González-Aguilar, G. A Technologies for Extraction and Production of Bioactive Compounds to be Used as Nutraceuticals and Food Ingredients: An Overview. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tufarelli, V.; Ceci, E.; Laudadio, V. 2-Hydroxy-4-methylselenobutanoic acid as new organic selenium dietary supplement to produce selenium-enriched eggs. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2016, 171, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tufarelli, V.; Ragni, M.; Laudadio, V. Feeding Forage in Poultry: A Promising Alternative for the Future of Production Systems. Agriculture 2018, 8, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Design of the experimental dietary treatments.
Table 1. Design of the experimental dietary treatments.
TreatmentRaw Amaranth Level (RAG, %)Enzyme (E)Factorial Method (RAG × E)Summarized
T10−0 × 00 RAG −E
T210−10 × 010 RAG −E
T320−20 × 020 RAG −E
T430−30 × 030 RAG −E
T540−40 × 040 RAG −E
T60 + 0 × 0.0250 RAG +E
T710 + 10 × 0.02510 RAG +E
T820 + 20 × 0.02520 RAG +E
T930 + 30 × 0.02530 RAG +E
T1040 + 40 × 0.02540 RAG +E
Table
Table 2. Ingredients and chemical composition of the diets fed to laying hens.
Table 2. Ingredients and chemical composition of the diets fed to laying hens.
Treatments 1
Ingredient (%)T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10
Corn61.4954.7948.1541.5632.6761.2454.4847.8941.3032.81
Soybean meal23.5621.7119.8217.8616.2223.5921.8419.9117.9516.24
Raw amaranth grain010.0020.0030.0040.00010.0020.0030.0040.00
Oyster mineral9.679.118.547.988.559.719.118.547.978.39
Vegetable oil2.401.620.840.030.002.581.801.010.210.00
Dicalcium phosphate1.881.881.881.871.861.881.881.881.871.86
Vitamin premix 20.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
Mineral premix 30.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.250.25
Salt0.200.200.200.200.200.200.200.200.200.20
DL-Methionine0.300.190.070.000.000.300.190.070.000.00
Natuzyme P50 3
Enzyme		0.000.000.000.000.000.0250.0250.0250.0250.025
Calculated nutrient content (%)
AMEn (kcal/kg)2830283028302830283028302830283028302830
Crude protein15.2515.2515.2515.2515.2515.2515.2515.2515.2515.25
Ether extract5.024.644.253.854.145.184.804.413.874.14
Crude fiber2.783.834.885.926.942.783.824.875.926.94
Linoleic acid1.583.954.315.065.861.583.954.315.065.86
Ca4.354.354.354.354.454.354.354.354.354.35
P available0.460.460.460.460.460.460.460.460.460.46
Meth0.370.410.420.420.420.370.410.420.420.42
Meth + Cyst0.670.670.670.720.720.670.670.670.720.72
Lys0.780.790.810.810.820.780.790.810.810.82
Arg0.810.820.820.850.860.810.820.820.850.86
Thr0.570.580.590.610.610.570.580.590.610.61
1 Treatments: T1: %0 RAG-E, T2: %10 RAG-E, T3: %20 RAG-E, T4: %30 RAG-E, T5: % 0 RAG-E, T6: %0 RAG+E, T7: %10 RAG+E, T8: %20 RAG+E, T9: %30 RAG-E, T10: %40 RAG+E. 2 Vitamin supplement provided per kg of diet: vitamin A, 8000 IU; vitamin E, 20 IU; menadione, 3.0 mg; vitamin D3, 2000 IU; riboflavin, 4.0mg; capantothenate, 12 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; choline 300 mg; vitamin B12, 15 mg; vitamin B6, 0.12 mg; thiamine, 1.5 mg; folic acid, 1.00 mg; biotin, 0.10 mg. 3 Mineral supplements provided per kg of diet: trace minerals (mg/kg of diet): Mn, 100; Zn, 70; Fe 50; Cu 10; Iodine 1; Se, 0.30; Antioxidant 50.00. SEM: standard error of the mean.
Table
Table 3. Bioactive phytochemical compounds of raw amaranth grains.
Table 3. Bioactive phytochemical compounds of raw amaranth grains.
ItemValue
Total phytosterols (mg/kg)3254.28
β-Sitosterol (%)38.49
Δ-5-Avena sterol (%)27.32
Stigmasterol (%)19.56
Total tocopherols (ppm)550.86
α-Tocopherol (ppm)18.61
β- and γ-Tocopherols (ppm)293.18
Δ-Tocopherol (ppm)239.07
Squalene (ppm)2173.40
Table
Table 4. Effect of experimental diets on productive performance of laying hens.
Table 4. Effect of experimental diets on productive performance of laying hens.
ItemFeed Intake
(g/day)		HDP
(%)		EW
(g)		EM
(g/day)		FCR
(kg feed:kg egg)
Raw Amaranth Grain (RAG, %)
0109.17 b81.80 a60.56 a49.54 a2.20 d
10109.47 a80.35 b59.05 b47.46 b2.31 c
20109.43 ab79.52 c56.65 c45.05 c2.43 b
30108.75 c78.61 d55.51 d43.64 d2.49 a
40108.86 c77.64 e56.20 cd43.63 d2.49 a
SEM0.0910.2550.3330.2730.014
Enzyme (E, %)
0 (−E)109.03 b79.4656.76 b44.92 b2.42 a
0.025 (+E)109.25 a79.7158.42 a46.81 a2.35 b
SEM0.0570.1610.2110.1730.008
RAG × E
0 × 0109.03 cd81.45 ab60.20 a49.04 a2.23 de
10 × 0109.27 bc79.91 cd57.55 b45.99 b2.34 c
20 × 0109.64 ab79.01def55.77 cd44.07 c2.45 b
30 × 0108.44 e77.98 fg54.75 d42.69 d2.54 a
40 × 0108.75 de77.05 g55.56 cd42.81 d2.55 a
0 × 0.025109.31 abc82.14 a60.91 a50.03 a2.18 e
10 × 0.025109.67 a80.80 bc60.55 a48.92 a2.26 d
20 × 0.025109.22 c80.02 cd57.54 b46.04 d2.40 bc
30 × 0.025109.06 cd79.24 de56.27 bc44.58 c2.44 b
40 × 0.025108.97 cd78.23 ef56.84 bc44.46 c2.45 b
SEM0.1290.3610.4710.3870.019
p-value
RAG0.0010.0010.0010.0010.001
E0.0110.2910.0010.0010.001
RAG × E0.0050.0050.0010.0010.003
a–g Means within each column with different superscripts differ significantly at (p ˂ 0.05). HDP: hen day production; EW: egg weight; EM: egg mass; FCR: feed conversion ratio. SEM: standard error of the means.
Table
Table 5. Effect of experimental diets on egg quality traits and yolk cholesterol of laying hens.
Table 5. Effect of experimental diets on egg quality traits and yolk cholesterol of laying hens.
ItemShell Thickness
(mm)		Shell Strength
(kg/cm2)		Shape Index
(%)		Egg Specific
(g/cm3)		Haugh UnitYolk Cholesterol
(mg/g)		Yolk Cholesterol
(mg/egg)
Raw Amaranth Grain (RAG, %)
00.3063.32374.501.08379.6612.59 a218.26 a
100.3073.31074.391.08079.8411.66 b201.87 b
200.3023.29374.351.07880.3211..39 b196.85 b
300.3053.33074.261.08080.3011.27 b193.77 b
400.3033.33374.801.08280.1511.24 b193.03 b
SEM0.0050.0320.6940.0011.0110.2354.010
Enzyme (E, %)
0 (−E)0.3043.31474.791.08079.7211.69201.22
0.025 (+E)0.3063.32274.131.08180.3911.57200.28
SEM0.0030.0200.4390.0011.0630.1482.536
RAG × E
0 × 00.3073.31773.641.08379.7312.77 a220.99 a
10 × 00.3053.30573.961.08179.511.72 bc201.92 bc
20 × 00.3003.28774.431.07779.7411.42 bc196.64 c
30 × 00.3023.32774.371.08179.9211.29 c193.74 c
40 × 00.3063.33274.751.08179.7111.25 c192.84 c
0 × 0.0250.3053.33074.751.08379.5812.42 ab215.53 ab
10 × 0.0250.3103.31575.151.08080.1911.60 bc201.82 bc
20 × 0.0250.3053.30074.741.07980.9011.36 bc197.06 c
30 × 0.0250.3073.33274.101.08080.6911.25 c193.79 c
40 × 0.0250.3023.33575.231.08380.5811.24 c193.21 c
SEM0.0080.0460.9820.0021.4300.3325.672
p-value
RAG0.9750.9080.9850.3810.9870.0010.001
E0.6990.7750.2950.7680.4670.5770.794
RAG × E0.9711.000.9200.8990.9930.0010.001
a–c Means within each column with different superscripts differ significantly at (p ˂ 0.05). SEM: standard error of the means.
Table
Table 6. Effect of experimental diets on blood biochemistry and antioxidant status parameters of laying hens.
Table 6. Effect of experimental diets on blood biochemistry and antioxidant status parameters of laying hens.
ItemTGTCLDLHDLAtherogenic IndexALT (U/l)AST (U/l)MDA (nmol/mL)TAC (U/mL)
Raw Amaranth Grain (RAG, %)
099.98105.86 a97.840.38 c2.42 a5.30215.635.296.20
1094.99102.34 b96.1947.07 ab2.04 bc5.14215.075.056.36
2094.65100.91 bc96.4647.12 ab2.04 bc5.01214.455.096.39
3096.2999.43 c96.4246.77 b2.06 b4.88213.544.726.38
4093.3799.90 bc95.9348.59 a1.98 c4.83213.824.946.37
SEM2.0510.8210.660.5620.0280.1821.1960.2040.088
Enzyme (E, %)
0 (−E)96.75102.85 a96.6846.122.115.11214.954.986.33
0.025 (+E)96.96100.52 b96.4445.852.114.96214.055.066.35
SEM1.2970.0190.4170.3550.0170.1150.7560.1290.056
RAG × E
0 × 0100.23106.73 a98.55 a40.23 c2.45 a5.45216.365.116.17
10 × 095.35103.51 ab96.56 ab46.29 b2.08 b5.22215.684.996.33
20 × 095.23102.68 bc96.78 ab46.86 b2.06 b5.12214.814.846.38
30 × 096.44100.58 cd96.20 ab46.78 b2.05 b4.89213.744.836.39
40 × 096.52100.74 cd95.33 b50.45 a1.89 c4.88214.165.116.37
0 × 0.02599.73104.98 ab97.05 ab40.53 c2.39 a5.15214.895.476.23
10 × 0.02594.63101.17 cd95.82 ab47.86 b2.00 bc5.07214.475.106.38
20 × 0.02594.0699.15 d96.14 ab47.39 b2.03 b4.9214.095.346.41
30 × 0.02596.1598.27 d96.65 ab46.76 b2.07 b4.88213.344.66.35
40 × 0.025100.2299.06 d96.52 ab46.73 b2.06 b4.79213.484.776.38
SEM2.9001.1610.9330.7950.0400.2581.6910.2890.125
p-value
RAG0.3190.0010.3290.0010.0010.3800.7200.3940.539
E0.9120.0030.6800.5980.9640.3560.4070.6590.797
RAG × E0.9170.0330.0340.0260.0250.9850.9980.5450.995
a–c Means within each column with different superscripts differ significantly at (p ˂ 0.05). TG: triglycerides; TC: total cholesterol; LDL: low-density lipoproteins; HDL: high-density lipoproteins; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; MDA: malondialdehyde; TAC: total antioxidant capacity. SEM: standard error of the means.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Janmohammadi, H.; Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, B.; Oliyai, M.; Alijani, S.; Gorlov, I.F.; Slozhenkina, M.I.; Mosolov, A.A.; Suarez Ramirez, L.; Seidavi, A.; Laudadio, V.; et al. Effect of Dietary Amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) Supplemented with Enzyme Blend on Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Antioxidant Status in Laying Hens. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020456

AMA Style

Janmohammadi H, Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad B, Oliyai M, Alijani S, Gorlov IF, Slozhenkina MI, Mosolov AA, Suarez Ramirez L, Seidavi A, Laudadio V, et al. Effect of Dietary Amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) Supplemented with Enzyme Blend on Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Antioxidant Status in Laying Hens. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(2):456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020456

Chicago/Turabian Style

Janmohammadi, Hossein, Babak Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, Majid Oliyai, Sadegh Alijani, Ivan Fedorovich Gorlov, Marina Ivanovna Slozhenkina, Aleksandr Anatolievich Mosolov, Lourdes Suarez Ramirez, Alireza Seidavi, Vito Laudadio, and et al. 2023. "Effect of Dietary Amaranth (Amaranthus hybridus chlorostachys) Supplemented with Enzyme Blend on Egg Quality, Serum Biochemistry and Antioxidant Status in Laying Hens" Antioxidants 12, no. 2: 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020456

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop