Next Article in Journal
Ten Key Insights into the Use of Spinal Cord fMRI
Next Article in Special Issue
Dyslexia as a Neurodevelopmental Disorder and What Makes It Different from a Chess Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond the Literal Meaning of Words in Children with Klinefelter Syndrome: Two Case Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reading Deficits in Intellectual Disability Are still an Open Question: A Narrative Review
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Brain Sci. 2018, 8(9), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8090172

Clinical and Electrophysiological Differences between Subjects with Dysphonetic Dyslexia and Non-Specific Reading Delay

1
Institute of Neurobiology, UNAM, Mexico City 76230, Mexico
2
Centro Internazionale dei disturbi di apprendimento, attenzione e iperattività, (CIDAAI) Milano 20125, Italy
3
Cuban Neuroscience Center Havana, Havana 10500, Cuba
4
MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China UESTC, Chengdu 610054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 August 2018 / Revised: 3 September 2018 / Accepted: 7 September 2018 / Published: 10 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dyslexia, Dysgraphia and Related Developmental Disorders)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1467 KB, uploaded 18 September 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

Reading is essentially a two-channel function, requiring the integration of intact visual and auditory processes both peripheral and central. It is essential for normal reading that these component processes go forward automatically. Based on this model, Boder described three main subtypes of dyslexia: dysphonetic dyslexia (DD), dyseidetic, mixed and besides a fourth group defined non-specific reading delay (NSRD). The subtypes are identified by an algorithm that considers the reading quotient and the % of errors in the spelling test. Chiarenza and Bindelli have developed the Direct Test of Reading and Spelling (DTRS), a computerized, modified and validated version to the Italian language of the Boder test. The sample consisted of 169 subjects with DD and 36 children with NSRD. The diagnosis of dyslexia was made according to the DSM-V criteria. The DTRS was used to identify the dyslexia subtypes and the NSRD group. 2–5 min of artefact-free EEG (electroencephalogram), recorded at rest with eyes closed, according to 10–20 system were analyzed. Stability based Biomarkers identification methodology was applied to the DTRS and the quantitative EEG (QEEG). The reading quotients and the errors of the reading and spelling test were significantly different in the two groups. The DD group had significantly higher activity in delta and theta bands compared to NSRD group in the frontal, central and parietal areas bilaterally. The classification equation for the QEEG, both at the scalp and the sources levels, obtained an area under the robust Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) of 0.73. However, we obtained a discrimination equation for the DTRS items which did not participate in the Boder classification algorithm, with a specificity and sensitivity of 0.94 to discriminate DD from NSRD. These results demonstrate for the first time the existence of different neuropsychological and neurophysiological patterns between children with DD and children with NSRD. They may also provide clinicians and therapists warning signals deriving from the anamnesis and the results of the DTRS that should lead to an earlier diagnosis of reading delay, which is usually very late diagnosed and therefore, untreated until the secondary school level. View Full-Text
Keywords: direct test of reading and spelling (DTRS); dysphonetic dyslexia; non-specific reading delay; QEEG; quantitative EEG tomography; source localization, VARETA, Biomarkers direct test of reading and spelling (DTRS); dysphonetic dyslexia; non-specific reading delay; QEEG; quantitative EEG tomography; source localization, VARETA, Biomarkers
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Bosch-Bayard, J.; Peluso, V.; Galan, L.; Valdes Sosa, P.; Chiarenza, G.A. Clinical and Electrophysiological Differences between Subjects with Dysphonetic Dyslexia and Non-Specific Reading Delay. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 172.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Brain Sci. EISSN 2076-3425 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top