This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing
by
Janka Wilbig
Janka Wilbig 1,
Alexander E. Wilson-Heid
Alexander E. Wilson-Heid 2
,
Laurent Bernard
Laurent Bernard 3,
Joseph Baptista
Joseph Baptista 3
and
Anne-Françoise Obaton
Anne-Françoise Obaton 1,*
1
Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE), 75015 Paris, France
2
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
3
Reactiv’IP, 38000 Grenoble, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 9876; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 August 2025
/
Revised: 29 August 2025
/
Accepted: 30 August 2025
/
Published: 9 September 2025
Abstract
The determination of uncertainty in porosity analysis based on X-ray computed tomography (XCT) images is currently the focus of research. This study aims to contribute to that by investigating the variation in porosity analysis resulting only from the segmentation and data analysis and by focusing on metal parts produced by different additive manufacturing processes, partially fabricated with intended porosity. Samples manufactured from aluminum, titanium alloy and nickel-chromium-based feedstock by liquid metal jetting (LMJ), laser-based powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) and directed energy deposition (DED) were scanned by XCT. The reconstructed volumes were distributed to four operators with different experience levels using Avizo, Dragonfly, Image J/Fiji, IPSDK Explorer, and VG Studio Max for porosity analysis. It was found that for all parts, the majority of operators chose a global manual threshold for image segmentation. Depending on the characteristics of the pores in the investigated samples, relative standard uncertainties up to 12% and 38% were observed for the LMJ and PBF-LB parts. For the part produced by DED, which showed the lowest overall porosity, relative standard uncertainties between 70% and 89% were observed for different image qualities; all were affected by the presence of artefacts investigated on purpose.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wilbig, J.; Wilson-Heid, A.E.; Bernard, L.; Baptista, J.; Obaton, A.-F.
Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9876.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876
AMA Style
Wilbig J, Wilson-Heid AE, Bernard L, Baptista J, Obaton A-F.
Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):9876.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wilbig, Janka, Alexander E. Wilson-Heid, Laurent Bernard, Joseph Baptista, and Anne-Françoise Obaton.
2025. "Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 9876.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876
APA Style
Wilbig, J., Wilson-Heid, A. E., Bernard, L., Baptista, J., & Obaton, A.-F.
(2025). Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 9876.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.