Next Article in Journal
Nutritional Analysis of Bottarga and Pilot Study Protocol for Bottarga Supplementation in Individuals with Prediabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Towards the Resilience of Attica Region’s Provincial Road 3 in Greece, Due to Slope Failure by Applying Civil Engineering Techniques and a Semi-Quantitative Assessment Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing

by
Janka Wilbig
1,
Alexander E. Wilson-Heid
2,
Laurent Bernard
3,
Joseph Baptista
3 and
Anne-Françoise Obaton
1,*
1
Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE), 75015 Paris, France
2
Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA 94550, USA
3
Reactiv’IP, 38000 Grenoble, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 9876; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 August 2025 / Revised: 29 August 2025 / Accepted: 30 August 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nondestructive Testing and Metrology for Advanced Manufacturing)

Abstract

The determination of uncertainty in porosity analysis based on X-ray computed tomography (XCT) images is currently the focus of research. This study aims to contribute to that by investigating the variation in porosity analysis resulting only from the segmentation and data analysis and by focusing on metal parts produced by different additive manufacturing processes, partially fabricated with intended porosity. Samples manufactured from aluminum, titanium alloy and nickel-chromium-based feedstock by liquid metal jetting (LMJ), laser-based powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) and directed energy deposition (DED) were scanned by XCT. The reconstructed volumes were distributed to four operators with different experience levels using Avizo, Dragonfly, Image J/Fiji, IPSDK Explorer, and VG Studio Max for porosity analysis. It was found that for all parts, the majority of operators chose a global manual threshold for image segmentation. Depending on the characteristics of the pores in the investigated samples, relative standard uncertainties up to 12% and 38% were observed for the LMJ and PBF-LB parts. For the part produced by DED, which showed the lowest overall porosity, relative standard uncertainties between 70% and 89% were observed for different image qualities; all were affected by the presence of artefacts investigated on purpose.
Keywords: X-ray computed tomography (XCT); porosity analysis; segmentation; additive manufacturing X-ray computed tomography (XCT); porosity analysis; segmentation; additive manufacturing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wilbig, J.; Wilson-Heid, A.E.; Bernard, L.; Baptista, J.; Obaton, A.-F. Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9876. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876

AMA Style

Wilbig J, Wilson-Heid AE, Bernard L, Baptista J, Obaton A-F. Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):9876. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wilbig, Janka, Alexander E. Wilson-Heid, Laurent Bernard, Joseph Baptista, and Anne-Françoise Obaton. 2025. "Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 9876. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876

APA Style

Wilbig, J., Wilson-Heid, A. E., Bernard, L., Baptista, J., & Obaton, A.-F. (2025). Comparison of Porosity Analysis Based on X-Ray Computed Tomography on Metal Parts Produced by Additive Manufacturing. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 9876. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189876

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop