Evolution of Life Satisfaction Throughout the Gestation Process and at Different Postpartum Stages
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Design
2.2. Procedure and Participants
2.3. Variables and Instruments
2.3.1. Satisfaction with Life [Time Points 1, 2, 3 and 4]
2.3.2. Sociodemographic and Occupational Variables [Time Point 1]
2.3.3. Psychosocial Variables [Time Point 1]
- -
- Positive and Negative Affect were assessed using the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson et al., 1988). The Positive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA) scales each consist of 10 items. Participants are required to indicate the extent to which they have experienced each affect using a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = not at all or very slightly to 5 = very much) during the specified time period (in this case, in the past month). The total score for each scale is the sum of the ratings given to the 10 items, ranging from 10 to 50 points, with higher scores indicating a greater presence of the specific affect. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.87 for positive affect and 0.86 for negative affect. Positive and negative affect are central components of emotional functioning and subjective well-being. As highlighted in recent meta-analytic study, these affective dimensions are closely linked to life satisfaction and provide a nuanced understanding of emotional experiences across the lifespan, including during motherhood (Buecker et al., 2023).
- -
- Social support. Perceived social support was measured using a 9-item scale (House, 1981; Westman et al., 2004) to assess three sources of support: spouse, family, and friends. Participants indicated the extent to which they: (a) shared their recent experiences with each source, (b) received emotional support and understanding, and (c) obtained advice or instrumental assistance. Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much). Higher average scores indicated greater perceived social support. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.81).The decision to use this scale was guided by both theoretical and methodological considerations. While more comprehensive instruments such as the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) are available, the brevity of the 9-item scale was deemed more appropriate given the multi-instrument nature of the survey and the need to reduce participant fatigue. The scale was used in its Hebrew version (Westman et al., 2004), without adaptation, and its validity has been supported in previous research (Lavenda & Kestler-Peleg, 2017; Kestler-Peleg & Lavenda, 2021). Social support is a widely recognized protective factor in maternal mental health. Recent qualitative reviews emphasize its role in buffering stress and enhancing resilience during pregnancy and early motherhood (Al-Mutawtah et al., 2023).
- -
- Attachment (anxiety and avoidance). Adult attachment style was measured using the Experience in Close Relationships Inventory (Brennan et al., 1998). This 36-item scale evaluates personal feelings toward close relationships on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). It assesses two key dimensions: avoidance (e.g., “I try to avoid getting too close to my partner”) and anxiety (e.g., “I worry a lot about my relationships”). Higher scores indicate a stronger tendency toward avoidant or anxious attachment. The scale demonstrated high reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88 for anxiety and 0.89 for avoidance. Attachment, particularly the emotional bond between mother and child, plays a key role in shaping maternal identity and psychological stability. Recent findings support its predictive value for life satisfaction and emotional well-being (Martucci et al., 2021).
- -
- Maternal self-efficacy was measured using the Parenting Sense of Competence Questionnaire (PSOC) (Johnson & Mash, 1989). This 18-item scale evaluates a mother’s perception of her effectiveness in fulfilling her parental role (e.g., “I have all the skills necessary to be a good mother to my child”). Participants rated their level of agreement with the statements concerning their children using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher average scores indicate greater maternal self-efficacy. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. Maternal self-efficacy has been shown to influence emotional outcomes and parenting satisfaction. Longitudinal research confirms its development from pregnancy through the postpartum period and its relevance for maternal adjustment (Samdan et al., 2022).
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Description of the Sociodemographic and Occupational Variables of the Sample
3.2. Associations Between Satisfaction with Life (SWL) and Sociodemographic, Occupational and Psychosocial Variables of the Sample
3.3. Evolution of Satisfaction with Life
3.4. Linear Regression Analysis Considering Life Satisfaction as the Outcome and Psychosocial Variables as Predictors
3.5. Subgroup Analysis: Employment Status and Parity
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Akkiraju, K., & Rao, N. D. (2025). Higher income is associated with greater life satisfaction, and more stress. Communications Psychology, 3(1), 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mutawtah, M., Campbell, E., Kubis, H. P., & Erjavec, M. (2023). Women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy: A qualitative systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23(1), 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ankit, C., & Jyotsna, P. (2022). Maternal mental health during pregnancy: A critical review. Cureus, 14(10), e30656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aochi, Y., Honjo, K., Kimura, T., Ikehara, S., & Iso, H. (2021). Association between maternal employment status during pregnancy and risk of depressive symptomatology 1 month after childbirth: The Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75(6), 531–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badr, H. A., Zauszniewski, J. A., Quinn Griffin, M., Burant, C. J., Przeworski, A., Almutairi, W. M., & Alsharif, F. H. (2021). Effects of postpartum fatigue and depressive cognitions on life satisfaction and quality of life in arab postpartum women: The intervening role of resourcefulness. Nursing Reports, 11(1), 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battulga, B., Benjamin, M. R., Chen, H., & Bat-Enkh, E. (2021). The impact of social support and pregnancy on subjective well-being: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 710858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berkovitch, N. (1997). Motherhood as a national mission: The construction of womanhood in the legal discourse in Israel. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(5–6), 605–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkovitch, N., & Manor, S. (2022). Between familism and neoliberalism: The case of Jewish Israeli grandmothers. Feminist Theory, 24(4), 597–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. (2009). The politics of “The Natural Family” in Israel: State policy and kinship ideologies. Social Science and Medicine, 69(7), 1018–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
- Buecker, S., Luhmann, M., Haehner, P., Bühler, J. L., Dapp, L. C., Luciano, E. C., & Orth, U. (2023). The development of subjective well-being across the life span: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 149(7–8), 418. [Google Scholar]
- Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Tay, L. (2018). Advances in subjective well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dyrdal, G. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2013). Reaction and adaptation to the birth of a child: A couple-level analysis. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 749–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziurka, M., Bucholc, M., Pilewska-Kozak, A., & Dobrowolska, B. (2021). Life satisfaction among women after vaginal delivery and caesarian section according to selected socio-demographic characteristics. Pielegniarstwo XXI Wieku, 20(2), 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Field, T. (2010). Postpartum depression effects on early interactions, parenting, and safety practices: A review. Infant Behavior and Development, 33(1), 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friesen, M. D., John Horwood, L., Fergusson, D. M., & Woodward, L. J. (2017). Exposure to parental separation in childhood and later parenting quality as an adult: Evidence from a 30-year longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(1), 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, S. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do a regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagaman, A., LeMasters, K., Zivich, P. N., Sikander, S., Bates, L. M., Bhalotra, S., Chung, E. O., Zaidi, A., & Maselko, J. (2021). Longitudinal effects of perinatal social support on maternal depression: A marginal structural modelling approach. Journal of Epidemiology Community Health, 75(10), 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Liu, D. (2021). Family function fully mediates the relationship between social support and perinatal depression in rural Southwest China. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1), 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, S. L., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A Measure of Parenting Satisfaction and Efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, R., Gur-Yaish, N., & Lowenstein, A. (2010). Motivation to provide help to older parents in Norway, Spain, and Israel. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 71(4), 283–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kay, T. L., Moulson, M. C., Vigod, S. N., Schoueri-Mychasiw, N., & Singla, D. R. (2024). The role of social support in perinatal mental health and psychosocial stimulation. Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 97(1), 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kestler-Peleg, M., & Lavenda, O. (2021). Optimism as a mediator of the association between social support and peripartum depression among mothers of neonatal intensive care unit hospitalized preterm infants. Stress and Health, 37(4), 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2021). Early maternal employment status and attachment quality: An investigation of a conditional process model. Journal of Family Issues, 42(2), 395–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage and Family Review, 35(1–2), 193–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lavenda, O., & Kestler-Peleg, M. (2017). Parental self-efficacy mitigates the association between low spousal support and stress. Psychiatry Research, 256, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y., Chen, J., Liu, X., Dang, J., & Schiöth, H. B. (2024). Social support predicted subsequent subjective well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective study. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martucci, M., Aceti, F., Giacchetti, N., & Sogos, C. (2021). The mother-baby bond: A systematic review about perinatal depression and child developmental disorders. Rivista di Psichiatria, 56(5), 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
- Nelson, S. K., Kushlev, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The pains and pleasures of parenting: When, why, and how is parenthood associated with more or less well-being? Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 846–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prati, G. (2024). The relationship between rural-urban place of residence and subjective well-being is nonlinear and its substantive significance is questionable. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 9(1), 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prosen, M., & Ličen, S. (2025). Maternal satisfaction with childbirth and its implications for maternity care quality: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quick, A. D., Tung, I., Keenan, K., & Hipwell, A. E. (2023). Psychological well-being across the perinatal period: Life satisfaction and flourishing in a longitudinal study of young black and white american women. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24(3), 1283–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubin, L., Belmaker, I., Somekh, E., Urkin, J., Rudolf, M., Honovich, M., Bilenko, N., & Grossman, Z. (2017). Maternal and child health in Israel: Building lives. The Lancet, 389(10088), 2514–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samdan, G., Reinelt, T., Kiel, N., Mathes, B., & Pauen, S. (2022). Maternal self-efficacy development from pregnancy to 3 months after birth. Infant Mental Health Journal, 43(6), 864–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vaillancourt, M., Lane, V., Ditto, B., & Da Costa, D. (2022). Parity and psychosocial risk factors increase the risk of depression during pregnancy among recent immigrant women in Canada. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 24(3), 570–579. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Van Haeken, S., Braeken, M. A., Nuyts, T., Franck, E., Timmermans, O., & Bogaerts, A. (2020). Perinatal resilience for the first 1,000 days of life. Concept analysis and delphi survey. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 563432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y., Gu, J., Zhang, F., & Xu, X. (2023). The effect of perceived social support on postpartum stress: The mediating roles of marital satisfaction and maternal postnatal attachment. BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westman, M., Etzion, D., & Horovitz, S. (2004). The toll of unemployment does not stop with the unemployed. Human Relations, 57(7), 823–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables Collected at Different Time Points | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
1st Evaluation Period | 2nd Evaluation Period | 3rd Evaluation Period | 4th Evaluation Period | |
Third Trimester | Eight Weeks After Birth | Five Months After Birth | Five Years After Birth | |
Outcome Variable | Satisfaction with Life | Satisfaction with Life | Satisfaction with Life | Satisfaction with Life |
Sociodemographic | Age, years of education, marital status, working status, scope of employment, family income, number of children, planned pregnancy and natural pregnancy. | |||
Psychosocial variables | Positive and Negative Affect Social support Attachment (anxiety and avoidance) Maternal self-efficacy |
Satisfaction with Life (SWL) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time Moment 1 | Time Moment 2 | Time Moment 3 | Time Moment 4 | |||||||||||||
f (%) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | |||
Age | 37.10 (4.34) | −0.035 | 0.421 | −0.147 | 0.002 | −0.046 | 0.412 | −0.176 | 0.007 | |||||||
Education | 16.46 (1.97) | 0.093 | 0.035 | 0.023 | 0.628 | 0.021 | 0.704 | 0.107 | 0.104 | |||||||
Working | Full time | 347 61.5% | 5.45 (0.89) | F | 6.087 | 0.002 | 5.55 (0.87) | 4.133 | 0.017 | 5.52 (0.95) | 0.475 | 0.623 | 5.87 (1.34) | 2.242 | 0.109 | |
Part-time | 125 22.2% | 5.60 (0.89) | 5.69 (0.74) | 5.50 (0.96) | 6.25 (1.61) | |||||||||||
Not working | 92 16.3% | 5.14 (1.20) | 5.29 (1.04) | 5.37 (1.08) | 5.63 (1.64) | |||||||||||
Income | Below average | 70 12.5% | 5.17 (1.19) | F | 7.385 | 0.001 | 5.45 (0.90) | 3.832 | 0.022 | 5.21 (0.96) | 5.214 | 0.006 | 6.00 (1.32) | 1.510 | 0.223 | |
About average | 124 22.2% | 5.28 (1.07) | 5.36 (1.08) | 5.23 (1.16) | 5.58 (1.68) | |||||||||||
Above average | 364 65.2% | 5.56 (0.82) | 5.63 (0.79) | 5.61 (0.90) | 5.98 (1.43) | |||||||||||
Number of children | Waiting for first child | 204 38.9% | 5.46 (0.96) | F | 1.443 | 0.230 | 5.58 (0.95) | 1.970 | 0.118 | 5.44 (1.03) | 0.870 | 0.45 | 5.96 (1.38) | 0.594 | 0.620 | |
One | 176 33.5% | 5.33 (1.02) | 5.38 (0.99) | 5.41 (1.03) | 5.76 (1.51) | |||||||||||
Two | 106 20.2% | 5.48 (0.84) | 5.63 (0.75) | 5.60 (0.89) | 5.85 (1.68) | |||||||||||
Three or more | 39 7.4% | 5.67 (0.85) | 5.66 (0.82) | 5.48 (0.99) | 6.27 (1.23) | |||||||||||
Planned pregnancy | Yes | 543 91.3% | 5.44 (0.95) | T | 1.449 | 0.148 | 5.55 (0.89) | 1.732 | 0.084 | 5.51 (0.95) | 0.767 | 0.444 | 5.89 (1.45) | 1.041 | 0.299 | |
no | 52 8.7% | 5.23 (1.04) | 5.28 (1.06) | 5.36 (1.22) | 5.48 (2.10) | |||||||||||
Natural Pregnancy | yes | 543 90.7% | 5.43 (0.97) | T | 0.438 | 0.661 | 5.53 (0.90) | 0.774 | 0.439 | 5.50 (0.99) | 0.816 | 0.415 | 5.89 (1.49) | 0.865 | 0.388 | |
No | 56 9.3% | 5.37 (0.94) | 5.43 (0.90) | 5.35 (0.87) | 5.62 (1.49) |
Satisfaction with Life (SWL) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time Point 1 | Time Point 2 | Time Point 3 | Time Point 4 | ||||||||||||
f (%) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | Mean (SD) | Test | p | ||
Positive Affect T1 | 3.33 (0.65) | 0.237 | <0.001 | 0.224 | <0.001 | 0.232 | <0.001 | 0.229 | <0.001 | ||||||
Negative Affect T1 | 2.18 (0.64) | −0.276 | <0.001 | −0.204 | <0.001 | −0.192 | <0.001 | −0.179 | 0.007 | ||||||
Social support T1 | 3.90 (0.55) | 0.232 | <0.001 | 0.241 | <0.001 | 0.211 | <0.001 | 0.366 | <0.001 | ||||||
Avoidance in engagement T1 | 2.85 (0.77) | −0.261 | <0.001 | −0.182 | <0.001 | −0.168 | 0.002 | −0.333 | <0.001 | ||||||
Attachment anxiety T1 | 2.88 (0.81) | −0.272 | <0.001 | −0.221 | <0.001 | −0.298 | <0.001 | −0.260 | <0.001 | ||||||
Maternal self-efficacy T1 | 3.22 (0.36) | 0.195 | <0.001 | 0.23 | <0.001 | 0.251 | <0.001 | 0.309 | <0.001 |
Student’s Test for Paired Samples | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Time 1 | Time 2 | Time 3 | Time 4 | Time 1–2 | Time 1–3 | Time 1–4 | Time 2–3 | Time 2–4 | Time 3–4 | |||||||
M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | M (SD) | t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | |
Satisfaction with Life | 5.56 (0.07) | 5.57 (0.07) | 5.52 (0.08) | 5.99 (0.12) | −0.766 | 0.444 | 1.387 | 0.166 | −5.924 | <0.001 | 1.729 | 0.085 | −4.873 | <0.001 | −4.525 | <0.001 |
Satisfaction with Life | F | p | Beta | t | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction with Life T1 | 17.98 | 0.170 | <0.001 | |||
Positive Affect | 0.100 | 2.181 | 0.030 | |||
Negative Affect | −0.127 | −2.726 | 0.007 | |||
Social support | 0.052 | 1.158 | 0.247 | |||
Avoidance in engagement | −0.176 | −4.124 | <0.001 | |||
Attachment anxiety | −0.120 | −2.666 | 0.008 | |||
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.091 | 2.047 | 0.041 | |||
Satisfaction with Life T2 | 9.53 | 0.116 | <0.001 | |||
Positive Affect | 0.088 | 1.687 | 0.092 | |||
Negative Affect | −0.069 | −1.310 | 0.191 | |||
Social support | 0.119 | 2.352 | 0.019 | |||
Avoidance in engagement | −0.091 | −1.878 | 0.061 | |||
Attachment anxiety | −0.086 | −1.661 | 0.097 | |||
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.092 | 1.819 | 0.070 | |||
Satisfaction with Life T3 | 8.908 | 0.143 | <0.001 | |||
Positive Affect | 0.126 | 2.139 | 0.033 | |||
Negative Affect | −0.045 | −0.768 | 0.443 | |||
Social support | 0.056 | 0.950 | 0.343 | |||
Avoidance in engagement | −0.075 | −1.306 | 0.193 | |||
Attachment anxiety | −0.200 | −3.428 | 0.001 | |||
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.091 | 1.591 | 0.113 | |||
Satisfaction with Life T4 | 7.418 | 0.168 | <0.001 | |||
Positive Affect | 0.054 | 0.742 | 0.459 | |||
Negative Affect | −0.008 | −0.102 | 0.919 | |||
Social support | 0.190 | 2.747 | 0.007 | |||
Avoidance in engagement | −0.193 | −2.850 | 0.005 | |||
Attachment anxiety | −0.120 | −1.604 | 0.110 | |||
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.024 | 0.329 | 0.742 |
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
Positive Affect | 0.597 | 0.003 | 0.444 | 0.035 | 0.525 | 0.049 | 0.598 | 0.127 |
Negative Affect | 0.002 | 0.397 | 0.334 | 0.331 | 0.437 | 0.243 | 0.408 | 0.607 |
Social support | 0.480 | 0.128 | 0.518 | 0.042 | 0.320 | 0.084 | 0.663 | 0.070 |
Avoidance in engagement | 0.005 | 0.165 | 0.038 | 0.816 | 0.968 | 0.731 | 0.008 | 0.190 |
Attachment anxiety | 0.041 | 0.098 | 0.383 | 0.211 | 0.092 | 0.025 | 0.881 | 0.120 |
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.160 | 0.025 | 0.229 | 0.040 | 0.124 | 0.154 | 0.154 | 0.801 |
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
Positive Affect | 0.202 | 0.019 | 0.650 | 0.046 | 0.272 | 0.169 | 0.778 | 0.053 |
Negative Affect | 0.106 | 0.040 | 0.283 | 0.154 | 0.217 | 0.333 | 0.538 | 0.714 |
Social support | 0.556 | 0.544 | 0.128 | 0.341 | 0.095 | 0.485 | 0.196 | 0.049 |
Avoidance in engagement | 0.152 | 0.064 | 0.378 | 0.251 | 0.972 | 0.470 | 0.172 | 0.233 |
Attachment anxiety | 0.148 | 0.098 | 0.826 | 0.066 | 0.495 | 0.004 | 0.365 | 0.295 |
Maternal self-efficacy | 0.317 | 0.024 | 0.085 | 0.363 | 0.236 | 0.499 | 0.995 | 0.854 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Crespo, M.; Kestler-Peleg, M.; Catalá, P.; Arribas, C.; Peñacoba, C. Evolution of Life Satisfaction Throughout the Gestation Process and at Different Postpartum Stages. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101390
Crespo M, Kestler-Peleg M, Catalá P, Arribas C, Peñacoba C. Evolution of Life Satisfaction Throughout the Gestation Process and at Different Postpartum Stages. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(10):1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101390
Chicago/Turabian StyleCrespo, María, Miri Kestler-Peleg, Patricia Catalá, Celia Arribas, and Cecilia Peñacoba. 2025. "Evolution of Life Satisfaction Throughout the Gestation Process and at Different Postpartum Stages" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 10: 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101390
APA StyleCrespo, M., Kestler-Peleg, M., Catalá, P., Arribas, C., & Peñacoba, C. (2025). Evolution of Life Satisfaction Throughout the Gestation Process and at Different Postpartum Stages. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), 1390. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101390