Abstract
Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with a major impact on respiratory function, but also with possible underestimated effects on cognitive function. Although interest in cognitive impairment in chronic respiratory diseases, such as COPD, has increased, data on IPF remain limited and heterogeneous. Objective: This systematic review aimed to synthesize current evidence on cognitive impairment in IPF, identify the most affected domains, and evaluate the certainty of evidence using standardized methodological tools. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020, with a registered PROSPERO protocol (CRD420251041866). Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched for studies from 2014 to 2025. Methodological quality and certainty of evidence were appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and GRADE frameworks. Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria (two cross-sectional, one descriptive, one case–control). Across investigations, working and verbal memory emerged as the most consistently impaired domains, followed by processing speed and executive function, whereas visuospatial and language abilities were less frequently affected. Cognitive impairment was present even in mild IPF and became more pronounced with lower DLCO, shorter 6 min walk distance, greater desaturation, and obstructive sleep apnea. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate due to small samples and heterogeneous testing. Conclusions: Cognitive dysfunction, particularly in memory, attention, and executive domains, is a frequent but under-recognized feature of IPF. Routine screening with brief, validated tools such as the MoCA may facilitate early detection and guide individualized rehabilitation.
1. Introduction
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a severe and progressive form of interstitial lung disease (ILD), characterized by irreversible fibrous remodeling of the lung parenchyma, loss of alveolar elasticity, and impaired gas exchange []. The disease mainly affects older adults and progresses slowly but steadily to respiratory failure and death. Despite therapeutic advances in recent decades, the prognosis remains poor, with median survival estimated at 3–5 years from diagnosis []. Worldwide, the prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ranges from 6.3 to 71 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, depending on the diagnostic criteria and the population studied [].
Most patients with IPF are elderly and have multiple comorbidities, which complicates clinical management and negatively impacts quality of life. Common comorbidities include cardiovascular disease, depression, obstructive sleep apnea, and neurological disorders []. In particular, research interest in cognitive impairment in chronic respiratory diseases has increased in recent years, especially in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), where significant cognitive impairment has been demonstrated even in patients without severe hypoxemia []. In contrast, the literature investigating cognition in IPF is extremely limited, and the mechanisms involved are poorly understood.
Existing evidence suggests that patients with IPF may present with a wide range of cognitive deficits, including impairments in memory, attention, language, psychomotor coordination, and executive functions [,]. A prospective study reported the presence of mild cognitive impairment in almost half of patients with IPF, in the absence of severe hypoxemia []. Also, the use of instruments such as MoCA or extended neuropsychological batteries revealed significantly lower scores in patients with IPF compared to controls [].
The involvement of factors such as chronic hypoxemia, systemic inflammation, decreased alveolar–capillary diffusing capacity (DLco), and the presence of OSA suggests a multifactorial contribution to cognitive decline in IPF [,]. In addition, systemic factors such as frailty, sarcopenia, corticosteroid use, and physical inactivity may contribute to neurocognitive degradation, further affecting the patient’s daily functionality [].
Cognitive impairment in IPF is not just an isolated comorbidity, but a problem with major clinical impact. Cognitive dysfunctions can limit the patient’s ability to understand medical indications, comply with treatments, actively participate in therapeutic decisions, or monitor symptoms and adverse reactions []. In addition, they can increase the risk of social isolation, depression, and repeated hospitalizations, affecting both the patient and his or her family []. However, in current clinical practice, cognitive screening is not systematically integrated into the assessment of patients with IPF.
Another essential problem is the lack of a standardized protocol for assessing cognition in IPF. The instruments used in existing studies vary considerably, from general questionnaires Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA) to complex neuropsychological batteries, with no consensus on interpretation thresholds or frequency of application []. In addition, most studies are cross-sectional, with small samples, and do not allow for the characterization of cognitive evolution in parallel with the progression of lung disease.
Despite the increasing awareness of cognitive dysfunction in other chronic respiratory diseases like COPD, evidence in IPF remains scattered and inconsistent. The lack of standardized assessment tools and the limited number of neuropsychological studies prevent the integration of cognitive evaluation into clinical practice. Therefore, understanding cognitive profiles in IPF could have direct effects on treatment adherence, rehabilitation participation, and patient autonomy.
This systematic review aimed to critically synthesize current evidence on cognitive impairment in IPF by integrating psychometric, physiological, and clinical data, while also assessing the certainty of the findings using standardized methodological appraisal tools like JBI and GRADE.
2. Materials and Methods
This paper is a systematic review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. The protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database under the code CRD420251041866. This study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the “Dr. Victor Babeș” Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonology in Timișoara (Approval No. 12196, dated 17 December 2024). This study did not involve direct enrollment of human participants. All included studies had obtained informed consent from their respective participants.
We conducted a systematic literature search in four electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library, for the period from 1 January 2014, to 1 September 2025. The search strategy was designed to maximize the identification of relevant articles on cognitive impairment in patients diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. To do this, terms were selected that combine the three main dimensions of interest: fibrosing interstitial lung disease, cognitive impairment, and methods used to assess cognitive function, with the use of Boolean operators “AND” and “OR” between concepts.
Keywords for IPF included the terms “idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,” “IPF,” “fibrosing interstitial pneumonia,”. For cognitive impairment, terms such as “cognitive impairment”, “cognitive dysfunction”, “cognitive decline”, “mild cognitive impairment”, “memory”, “attention”, “executive function”, “processing speed”, “working memory” and “neurocognitive” were used. Regarding assessment instruments, the strategy included terms such as “MoCA”, “Montreal Cognitive Assessment”, “MMSE”, “Trail Making Test”, “TMT”, “Digit Span”, “Verbal Fluency”, “neuropsychological test” and “cognitive battery”. To cover terminological variability, truncations such as “cognit* impair*” and “neuropsycholog* test*” were used, and the query was limited to the occurrence of the terms in the title and abstract of the articles. In addition, bibliographies of included articles were manually reviewed to identify other relevant sources, and clinical trial registries, such as ClinicalTrials.gov and ISRCTN, were consulted to capture possible ongoing or unpublished work. To minimize publication bias and ensure comprehensive coverage, we also reviewed grey literature sources including clinical trial registries and conference proceedings.
Study Selection and Data Extraction
A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library identified 134 articles. After removing 28 duplicates, 106 articles remained for screening based on title and abstract. Of these, 84 were excluded because they did not specifically address cognitive dysfunction or did not target patients with IPF.
A total of 18 articles were assessed in full text for eligibility. After removal of duplicates, all retrieved titles and abstracts were independently screened by two authors (A.C. and D.M.) based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible full texts were then reviewed in detail. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus; when necessary, a third author (C.0.) was consulted to arbitrate. 18 articles were excluded for the following reasons: six did not address IPF, four did not report cognitive outcomes, three were available only in abstract form, three were reviews, and two did not have access to the full text. Ultimately, four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the selection process.
The quality of the included studies was assessed using the tools developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), specific to each type of study (cross-sectional, observational, descriptive). The scores were calculated as a proportion between the number of criteria met and the total number applicable to each []. Item-by-item results are summarized in a dedicated appraisal table, covering the four studies included in this review [,,,] (Supplementary Table S1).
The level of certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) []. This assessment was carried out independently by two authors, and any divergences were resolved by consensus. The justification for the JBI and GRADE scores is presented in Table 1 which details the instruments used, the cognitive domains investigated, and the clinical correlates reported. A summary of findings table was constructed to present the key outcomes, the certainty of evidence for each cognitive domain, and the main findings according to GRADE recommendations (Supplementary Table S2) reflecting the same body of evidence included in this review [,,,]. Due to the small number of included studies, a funnel plot to assess publication bias was not feasible.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the included studies on cognitive function in IPF.
3. Results
We reviewed four full-text articles that met the inclusion criteria (Figure 1). Of these, two were cross-sectional studies [,], one was a prospective descriptive study [], and one was a case–control pilot study []. Together, these investigations provide the first evidence mapping the cognitive profile of patients with IPF. Despite methodological variability, all studies used validated neuropsychological assessments and included control groups. The most common tools were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT A/B), Stroop, and the Hopkins or Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Tests. The overall methodological quality was moderate, with JBI scores of 6/8 across all studies. Certainty of evidence for each cognitive domain was graded using GRADE criteria, ranging from low to very low depending on the number of supporting studies and the internal consistency of findings (Supplementary Table S2).
3.1. Presence of Cognitive Impairment in IPF
Across all four studies, patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis showed measurable declines in cognitive performance compared to healthy individuals. Tudorache et al. observed significantly lower global MoCA scores in IPF patients relative to controls (median 24 vs. 27 points, p = 0.003) []. Bors et al. similarly reported poorer outcomes in the severe IPF group compared to both mild IPF and matched controls, especially on tasks involving processing speed and divided attention, such as Trail Making Test B (mean completion time 135.9 s vs. 83.2 s in controls, p < 0.01) []. Giannouli et al. found that ILD patients, including those with IPF, performed notably worse than matched controls across multiple cognitive tasks despite similar demographic characteristics []. Additionally, Annaka et al. demonstrated that even patients with mild IPF scored lower than controls on measures of memory, attention, and executive functioning, including significantly impaired delayed recall on the RAVLT (p < 0.004) []. Overall, these findings consistently indicate that cognitive dysfunction is detectable in IPF throughout the disease spectrum.
3.2. Cognitive Domains Affected in IPF
The pattern of cognitive impairment varied across different domains, although several areas of dysfunction were consistently identified. Memory deficits were among the most commonly reported findings. Both Bors et al. and Annaka et al. described reductions in verbal learning and delayed recall [,], while Giannouli et al. identified impairments in both verbal and visual memory compared to controls []. Processing speed was also consistently affected, with longer completion times seen on Trail Making Test A/B and decreased performance on Stroop paradigms, especially in individuals with more advanced disease [,,]. Executive dysfunction, presenting as difficulties in divided attention, interference control, and cognitive flexibility, was likewise observed across these studies. Additional findings included lower working memory performance [], reduced visuospatial accuracy and constructional skills [,], and decreases in naming or fluency that were less consistently reported across studies [,]. Motor coordination issues, demonstrated by slower psychomotor and fine-motor performance, were mainly seen in severe IPF []. Overall, the strongest evidence pointed to impairments in memory, processing speed, and executive function, while visuospatial and language-related deficits were more variably reported. A summarized overview of the specific cognitive domains affected in IPF, along with their characteristic impairments and associated physiological correlates, is provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary of cognitive domains affected in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
3.3. Physiological and Clinical Correlations of Cognitive Impairment
Several physiological and clinical parameters showed significant links to cognitive performance in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. In three studies, reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide was the most consistent physiological factor. Lower DLCO levels correlated with poorer attention, slower processing speed, and decreased verbal fluency, suggesting that impaired gas-exchange efficiency may reflect or contribute to disruptions in neural networks that support higher-level cognitive functions [,,].
Exercise capacity also played an important role. Giannouli et al. reported that shorter six-minute walk distance correlated with weaker memory performance and reduced psychomotor speed, indicating that diminished functional reserve may contribute to cognitive inefficiency through exercise-induced desaturation or impaired cardiovascular response [].
Markers of oxygenation showed further links with cognitive outcomes. Lower end-walk oxygen saturation, more exertional desaturation, and higher post-exercise heart rate were associated with slower processing speed and less accuracy on recognition tasks in ILD and IPF groups [,]. Sleep-disordered breathing also seemed to affect cognitive outcomes. Tudorache et al. found that a higher apnea–hypopnea index and increased daytime sleepiness were independently linked to MoCA scores below 23, even after adjusting for demographic factors and lung function, suggesting that nocturnal hypoxia or sleep fragmentation may worsen cognitive vulnerability in IPF [].
Clinical severity indicators further support these associations. Annaka et al. found that higher mMRC dyspnea scores and more advanced GAP stages were linked to worse performance in memory and executive functioning tasks []. Together, these findings suggest that reductions in diffusing capacity, limited exercise tolerance, abnormal oxygenation patterns, sleep-related breathing disturbances, and overall disease severity contribute to the cognitive phenotype seen in IPF.
4. Discussion
To our knowledge, this review is the first to systematically assess both methodological quality and certainty of evidence regarding cognitive impairment in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, using the JBI and GRADE frameworks to measure the strength and consistency of findings across cognitive domains. Across all included investigations, the collective evidence clearly supports the presence of cognitive impairment in IPF, establishing this phenomenon as a reproducible clinical feature rather than an incidental observation [,,,].
Across all available studies, patients with IPF performed worse on cognitive assessments than healthy controls or individuals with other chronic respiratory diseases. Bors et al. reported significant deficits in divided attention, psychomotor coordination, and verbal learning, especially in patients with severe IPF (DLCO < 30%) who needed oxygen therapy []. Giannouli et al. confirmed that lower DLCO and post-exercise desaturation were linked to poorer scores on tests of memory, attention, and processing speed []. Tudorache et al. found global cognitive decline, with more severe impairment in patients who also had obstructive sleep apnea []. Most recently, Annaka et al. showed that cognitive dysfunction can occur even in mild IPF, with lower performance on tasks involving verbal learning, delayed recall, and cognitive flexibility []. Together, these findings indicate that cognitive decline in IPF follows a progression, starting early and worsening as the disease advances and with comorbidities like OSA or frailty.
Across the four included original studies, cognitive impairment in IPF was consistently demonstrated, despite differences in samples and assessment tools. Bors et al. [] and Giannouli et al. [] used extended neuropsychological batteries and showed broad decrements spanning attention, processing speed, psychomotor coordination, memory, and naming/fluency, whereas Tudorache et al. [] applied a global screener (MoCA) to examine the impact of comorbid OSA. Annaka et al. [] added staged case–control data, showing that patients with more advanced physiological impairment (stage II–III) performed worse on processing-speed and interference tasks and on verbal learning, with significant group effects for Clock Drawing, RAVLT immediate recall, and Stroop/Reverse Stroop, and post hoc differences indicating poorer scores in stage II–III versus stage I or controls.
A common finding across studies was the relationship with disease severity. Lower diffusion capacity and oxygen therapy status identified patients with the slowest TMT and poorest pegboard performance; the effect was strongest when DLCO was below approximately 30 percent predicted or supplemental oxygen was needed []. Giannouli reported inverse correlations between cognitive scores and DLCO and FEV1/FVC, along with associations to post-exercise desaturation and heart rate, linking aerobic strain to executive and attentional inefficiency []. Annaka’s staging analysis aligned with this pattern: the stage II–III group, who also had higher mMRC scores and lower DLCO, performed worse on interference-based tasks and verbal learning compared to stage I and controls []. Complementing physiological severity, Tudorache showed that OSA comorbidity independently worsened overall cognitive status on the MoCA, even when resting spirometric values were acceptable, indicating an additional burden from nocturnal hypoxemia and sleep fragmentation [].
While these associations are consistent, the underlying biological mechanisms remain insufficiently explored in the primary literature. Several mechanistic pathways may plausibly explain the vulnerability of specific cognitive domains identified in this review. Chronic hypoxemia and intermittent desaturation can impair cerebral oxygen delivery, leading to regional cerebral hypoperfusion, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress, processes known to disproportionately affect the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, the two regions most essential for verbal memory, working memory, processing speed, and executive control. Evidence from neurophysiology indicates that even moderate hypoxia can reduce hippocampal neurogenesis and impair long-term potentiation [,], while the prefrontal cortex is highly sensitive to fluctuations in oxygenation and inflammatory signaling []. These mechanisms align well with the domain profile observed in IPF. Intermittent desaturation, particularly with exertion or during sleep, may further generate cycles of oxidative injury, autonomic imbalance, and microvascular compromise, resembling the cognitive pattern described in OSA []. This may explain why patients with concomitant OSA, as reported by Tudorache et al. [], present with more pronounced global deficits.
Systemic inflammation is another biologically plausible mechanism. IPF features chronic inflammatory activation, and circulating cytokines can cross the blood–brain barrier, activate microglia, and impair synaptic plasticity []. Similar lung–brain inflammatory pathways are observed in COPD and are increasingly seen as contributors to cognitive decline. Recent studies in COPD have identified the aging-related cytokine growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) as a possible mediator linking physical inactivity, mitochondrial stress, and cognitive impairment []. Because COPD and IPF share features such as chronic hypoxemia, reduced physical activity, systemic inflammation, frailty, and progressive functional decline, it is biologically plausible that senescence-related factors like GDF-15, IL-6, TNF-α, and other inflammatory mediators may similarly influence the “lung–brain–muscle” axis in IPF. Although there are no specific biomarker studies on IPF yet, this is a promising area for future research.
Analyzing these converging mechanisms together provides a plausible neurobiological explanation for why memory and executive functions, which are highly sensitive to oxygen and inflammatory fluctuations, are consistently among the most affected in IPF.
Within this broader framework, reduced exercise capacity may not only indicate pulmonary limitation but also increase cerebral vulnerability through decreased neurotrophic support and diminished cerebrovascular reactivity, mechanisms described in chronic cardiorespiratory disease []. These interconnected pathways help explain why functions that require rapid information processing and flexible executive control, which depend on intact fronto-subcortical circuits, are disproportionately impaired in IPF.
In the context of these observations, cognitive impairment should not be viewed as an isolated phenomenon, but as a relevant component of the global clinical picture in IPF, with direct functional implications. Multidimensional assessment that integrates pulmonary parameters, exercise tests and neurocognitive status provides a more accurate picture of the impact of the disease on the quality of life and autonomy of patients [,,,].
This holistic approach is also supported by the ATS/ERS guidelines on the evaluation of patients with interstitial lung disease, which recommend screening for depression, anxiety, and cognitive function, along with functional testing [,].
Reduced attention, memory, and executive function may hinder adherence to oxygen therapy, recognition of symptom worsening, and active engagement in pulmonary rehabilitation [,,,]. Similar patterns seen in other chronic diseases, like heart failure and chronic kidney disease, highlight the prognostic significance of cognitive decline, which is linked to higher mortality, more hospitalizations, and poorer compliance with treatment plans [,,].
Given these implications, systematic cognitive screening should be incorporated into multidisciplinary care, especially for moderate and severe IPF [,]. Brief, validated tools like the MoCA or Mini-Cog can efficiently detect subtle deficits, even when used by non-specialist staff, and can guide personalized therapeutic strategies and psychosocial support [,]. Early detection of cognitive impairment may also enable timely rehabilitation adjustments and enhance overall disease management [,,].
Bridging the gaps: what comes next?
The first major limitation of the existing literature is the small number of studies that have systematically evaluated cognitive dysfunction in IPF, compared to other chronic respiratory pathologies such as COPD or OSA. In the PubMed database, there are over 10 times more studies related to “cognition + COPD” than to “cognition + IPF”, reflecting a clear gap in scientific interest in this area. Furthermore, most available studies are observational, with small samples and cross-sectional designs, which limits the possibility of establishing a causal relationship between the severity of lung disease and cognitive impairment.
Another important limitation is the lack of consensus on the optimal cognitive instruments for this population. Studies have used different tests (MoCA, MMSE, complex neuropsychological batteries), which reduces the comparability of results and prevents rigorous meta-analyses. For example, the MMSE is recognized as less sensitive to impairment of executive functions and attention—domains frequently altered in chronic hypoxia—while the MoCA is more appropriate but less widely used. Also, possible confounding factors—such as depression, anxiety, pharmacological treatments, or sleep disorders—are not controlled or consistently reported in current studies. Psychological distress, including symptoms of depression and anxiety, is frequently reported in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and can negatively influence cognitive test performance, potentially masking or exaggerating true neurocognitive impairment []. Less explored are the brain imaging changes associated with IPF, although some studies have begun to investigate the relationships between hypoxia, vascular microlesions, and cortical atrophy using functional MRI or DTI [,].
The present review adds novelty by being, to our knowledge, the first to quantitatively evaluate both methodological quality and certainty of evidence across cognitive domains using the JBI and GRADE frameworks. This approach allows a clearer understanding of the relative robustness of available data and identifies domains where the certainty remains low or very low, especially for visuospatial and language functions.
In terms of future directions, the following are needed:
- Longitudinal studies to track cognitive evolution over time and identify early predictors of decline.
- Targeted interventions, such as cognitive exercises combined with respiratory rehabilitation, to assess the impact on cognitive function and quality of life.
- Integrating inflammatory or imaging biomarkers to better understand the neurobiological substrate of cognitive dysfunction in IPF.
- Evaluating the impact of antifibrotic therapy on cognition, considering potential indirect effects through amelioration of hypoxia and reduction in exacerbations.
5. Conclusions
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis consistently linked to measurable cognitive impairment, most often affecting working memory, verbal learning, processing speed, and executive function. These deficits are seen throughout the disease spectrum, including mild IPF, and are clinically significant because they may impact treatment adherence, daily activities, and participation in rehabilitation.
At the same time, the certainty of the current evidence remains low to very low according to the GRADE assessment, primarily due to the small number of available studies, modest sample sizes, and heterogeneity in cognitive testing methods. This limitation highlights an urgent need for high-quality, prospective, and mechanistic studies to accurately determine the prevalence, trajectory, and clinical implications of cognitive dysfunction in IPF.
Despite these limitations, short cognitive screening tools like the MoCA may assist clinicians in identifying early deficits and integrating cognitive factors into personalized management and rehabilitation plans for patients with IPF.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/medsci13040288/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Item-by-item JBI grading for the included studies. Supplementary Table S2: Certainty of evidence for cognitive domains in the included studies.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.M. and C.O.; methodology, A.F.C. and E.T.; validation, A.F.C. and V.C.; investigation, V.C.; resources, C.O. and D.M.; data curation, A.F.C. and V.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T. and D.M.; writing—review and editing, A.F.C.; visualization, C.O.; supervision, D.T. and C.O.; project administration, A.F.C. and E.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD420251041866). Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara (Approval No. 12196, dated 17 December 2024).
Informed Consent Statement
Since this study did not involve direct participation of human subjects or collection of primary data, informed consent was not required.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Acknowledgments
The publication costs of the present article were covered by “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| Abbreviation | Meaning |
| 6MWD | Six-minute walk distance |
| AHI | Apnea–Hypopnea Index |
| BDI-II | Beck Depression Inventory-II |
| COPD | Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
| DLCO | Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide |
| FEV1 | Forced expiratory volume in one second |
| FVC | Forced vital capacity |
| GRADE | Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation |
| HR | Heart rate |
| HRQoL | Health-related quality of life |
| HVLT-DR | Hopkins Verbal Learning Test—Delayed Recall |
| ILD | Interstitial lung disease |
| IPF | Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis |
| JBI | Joanna Briggs Institute |
| mMRC | Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale |
| MoCA | Montreal Cognitive Assessment |
| MMSE | Mini-Mental State Examination |
| OSA | Obstructive sleep apnea |
| PRISMA | Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
| PROSPERO | International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews |
| RAVLT | Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test |
| SF-36 | Short Form-36 Health Survey |
| SpO2 | Peripheral oxygen saturation |
| TMT-A/B | Trail Making Test A and B |
References
- Barratt, S.L.; Creamer, A.; Hayton, C.; Chaudhuri, N. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF): An overview. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kropski, J.A. Familial Interstitial Lung Disease. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 41, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podolanczuk, A.J.; Wong, A.W.; Saito, S.; Lasky, J.A.; Ryerson, C.J.; Eickelberg, O. Update in interstitial lung disease 2020. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021, 203, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vastag, Z.; Tudorache, E.; Traila, D.; Fira-Mladinescu, O.; Marc, M.S.; Oancea, C.; Rosca, E.C. Neurocognitive and Neuropsychiatric Implications of Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siraj, R.A. Comorbid Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Current Understanding, Risk Factors, Implications for Clinical Practice, and Suggested Interventions. Medicina 2023, 59, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bors, M.; Tomic, R.; Perlman, D.M.; Kim, H.J.; Whelan, T.P.M. Cognitive function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chron. Respir. Dis. 2015, 12, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannouli, V.; Markopoulou, A.; Kiosseoglou, G.; Kosmidis, M.H. Neuropsychological functioning in patients with interstitial lung disease. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 2022, 29, 1290–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharp, C.; Adamali, H.; Millar, A.; Dodd, J. P274 Cognitive function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax 2016, 71 (Suppl. S3), A237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tudorache, V.; Traila, D.; Marc, M.; Oancea, C.; Manolescu, D.; Tudorache, E.; Timar, B.; Albai, A.; Fira-Mladinescu, O. Impact of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea on the cognition in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0211455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanada, M.; Tanaka, T.; Kozu, R.; Ishimatsu, Y.; Sakamoto, N.; Orchanian-Cheff, A.; Rozenberg, D.; Reid, W.D. The interplay of physical and cognitive function in rehabilitation of interstitial lung disease patients: A narrative review. J. Thorac. Dis. 2023, 15, 4503–4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Annaka, H.; Honma, K.; Nomura, T. A Scoping Review of Factor-Related Cognitive Impairment in Interstitial Lung Disease. Cureus 2024, 16, e67791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilton, M. JBI Critical appraisal checklist for systematic reviews and research syntheses. J. Can Health Libr. Assoc. 2024, 45, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schünemann, H.J.; Oxman, A.D.; Brozek, J.; Glasziou, P.; Jaeschke, R.; Vist, G.E.; Williams, J.W., Jr.; Kunz, R.; Craig, J.; Montori, V.M.; et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 2008, 336, 1106–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Annaka, H.; Nomura, T.; Moriyama, H. Cognitive Function in Patients with Mild Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Case-Control Pilot Study. Occup. Ther. Health Care 2025, 39, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, R.O.; Weaver, L.K.; Pope, D.; Orme, J.F.; Bigler, E.D.; Larson-Lohr, V. Neuropsychological sequelae and impaired health status in survivors of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miyo, K.; Uchida, Y.; Nakano, R.; Kamijo, S.; Hosonuma, M.; Yamazaki, Y.; Isobe, H.; Ishikawa, F.; Onimaru, H.; Yoshikawa, A.; et al. Intermittent Hypoxia Induces Cognitive Dysfunction and Hippocampal Gene Expression Changes in a Mouse Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michiels, C. Review Physiological and Pathological Responses to Hypoxia. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 1875–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, Y.; McEvoy, C.T.; Allen, I.; Yaffe, K. [P1–588]: Sleep-disordered breathing, cognitive function and risk of cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimer’s Dement 2017, 13, P246–P247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, W.; Xiao, D.; Mao, Q.; Xia, H. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirano, T.; Doi, K.; Matsunaga, K.; Takahashi, S.; Donishi, T.; Suga, K.; Oishi, K.; Yasuda, K.; Mimura, Y.; Harada, M.; et al. A Novel Role of Growth Differentiation Factor (GDF)-15 in Overlap with Sedentary Lifestyle and Cognitive Risk in COPD. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boa Sorte Silva, N.C.; Barha, C.K.; Erickson, K.I.; Kramer, A.F.; Liu-Ambrose, T. Physical exercise, cognition, and brain health in aging. Trends Neurosci. 2024, 47, 402–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gimeno-Santos, E.; Frei, A.; Steurer-Stey, C.; de Batlle, J.; Rabinovich, R.A.; Raste, Y.; Hopkinson, N.S.; Polkey, M.I.; van Remoortel, H.; Troosters, T.; et al. Determinants and outcomes of physical activity in patients with COPD: A systematic review. Thorax 2014, 69, 731–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cleutjens, F.A.; Wouters, E.F.; Dijkstra, J.B.; Spruit, M.A.; Franssen, F.M.; Vanfleteren, L.E.; Ponds, R.W.; Janssen, D.J. The COgnitive-Pulmonary Disease (COgnitive-PD) study: Protocol of a longitudinal observational comparative study on neuropsychological functioning of patients with COPD. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e004495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wuyts, W.A.; Papiris, S.; Manali, E.; Kilpeläinen, M.; Davidsen, J.R.; Miedema, J.; Robalo-Cordeiro, C.; Morais, A.; Artés, M.; Asijee, G.; et al. The Burden of Progressive Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Disease: A DELPHI Approach. Adv Ther. 2020, 37, 3246–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghu, G.; Remy-Jardin, M.; Myers, J.L.; Richeldi, L.; Ryerson, C.J.; Lederer, D.J.; Behr, J.; Cottin, V.; Danoff, S.K.; Morell, F.; et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 198, e44–e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalaria, R.N.; Akinyemi, R.; Ihara, M. Does vascular pathology contribute to Alzheimer changes? J. Neurol. Sci. 2012, 322, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yohannes, A.M.; Chen, W.; Moga, A.M.; Leroi, I.; Connolly, M.J. Cognitive Impairment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017, 18, e1–e451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alosco, M.L.; Spitznagel, M.B.; van Dulmen, M.; Raz, N.; Cohen, R.; Sweet, L.H.; Colbert, L.H.; Josephson, R.; Hughes, J.; Rosneck, J.; et al. Cognitive function and treatment adherence in older adults with heart failure. Psychosom. Med. 2012, 74, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristensen, F.; Gregersen, R.; Pedersen, M.K.; Skrubbeltrang, C.; Thuesen, J. Rehabilitation needs in people living with Dementia: A scoping review of assessment tools and procedures. Aging Health Res. 2024, 4, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tainta, M.; Iriondo, A.; Ecay-Torres, M.; Estanga, A.; de Arriba, M.; Barandiaran, M.; Clerigue, M.; Garcia-Sebastian, M.; Villanua, J.; Izagirre, A.; et al. Brief cognitive tests as a decision-making tool in primary care. A population and validation study. Neurologia 2024, 39, 781–791. [Google Scholar]
- Kernick, D.; Chew-Graham, C.A.; O’Flynn, N. Clinical assessment and management of multimorbidity: Nice guideline. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2017, 67, 235–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cox, I.A.; Borchers Arriagada, N.; de Graaff, B.; Corte, T.J.; Glaspole, I.; Lartey, S.; Walters, E.H.; Palmer, A.J. Health-related quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 200154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helmy, E.M.; Sakrana, A.A.; Abdel-Fattah, S.; Elsaid, A.R. Diffusion tensor imaging of white matter integrity in relation to smoking index and exacerbations in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 2019, 50, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Liu, Y.; Guan, Z.; Li, C.; Zhang, Z. Neuroimaging insights into lung disease-related brain changes: From structure to function. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2025, 17, 1550319. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).