Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Oil and Gas Potential in Vychegda Trough in Connection with the Identification of Potential Petroleum Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Jacking Forces in Weathered Phyllite Based on In Situ Pressuremeter Testing and Deep Learning
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Incipient Salinization: A Case Study of the Spring of Asclepieion in Lentas (Ancient Lebena), Crete

by
Emmanouil Manoutsoglou
1,* and
Ekaterini S. Bei
2
1
School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
2
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2024, 14(3), 56; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030056
Submission received: 29 December 2023 / Revised: 9 February 2024 / Accepted: 19 February 2024 / Published: 21 February 2024

Abstract

:
Sanctuaries devoted to Asclepius were established and operated for almost a thousand years in various Greek and Roman cities throughout the Mediterranean region. The Asclepieion sanctuary in Lentas (formerly known as Ancient Lebena) in Crete was famous for receiving water from a sacred spring. In Ancient Lebena, Levinaion was a famous centre for hydrotherapy, physiotherapy, and a psychiatric hospital. In the present paper, we aim to assess the hydrochemical status of this sacred spring that holds a prominent position in archaeological and historical studies. The main objectives of this study are: Initially, to present supervisory evidence (archaeological, geological, hydrochemical) of an area that was a water resource management model for many centuries, carrying out therapeutic work. The second objective is to present and compare hydrochemical data in the last century, i.e., from 1915 to 2021. The third objective is to highlight and warn of an incipient saltwater intrusion in the area along the Lentas coast. The fourth objective is to propose an alternative and sustainable form of water resources management in the region that requires the study and rational utilization of the sporadic small water springs in the region. Our study focuses on a basic hydrochemical analysis of spring and borehole water in the remains of Levinaion in the Lentas region, and their comparison with sparse historical data of the sacred spring water, aiming to interpret the impact of the changes in the spring water resources that occurred in recent decades due to urban modernization. Our results highlight (i) visible fluctuations in chemical composition of borehole water samples; (ii) a neutral to alkaline pH in borehole waters and an alkaline pH in spring waters; (iii) undetectable arsenic in Lentas borehole water, unlike historical data of Lentas spring water; (iv) low values of dissolved radon in Lentas borehole water and the spring water of Kefalovrysa; and (v) a timeless constant and hypothermic nature of the water of both the sacred spring and borehole of Lentas, and also of the Kefalovrysa spring. The recorded historical data, i.e., from 1915 to 1957, due to the absence of substantial anthropogenic activity in the area, can be used as reference values (natural background levels, NBLs) for the Lentas area. Our findings emerge with the need to bring again the flowing spring water of the sacred spring of Lentas in its original form through sustainable management and re-discover its beneficial therapeutical effects.

1. Introduction

The spring water of an area can reveal evidence of the past and provide evidence of very slow geological changes and human intervention in the present. In this sense, by looking back and using historical data of hydrochemical analyses and comparing them with today’s data, we can understand not only today’s geological processes and contrasts, but also anthropogenic interventions. Thermal springs are defined as a location where the water flowing out is above 20 degrees or above the average annual ambient temperature of the area. Thermal spring water has various uses, such as power generation, spas, agriculture, washing, and aquaculture. Despite the numerous thermal springs worldwide, there is limited scientific understanding of their hydrogeochemistry. The temperature of thermal springs may be elevated due to the geothermal gradient in the area, exothermic reactions, and radioactive decay. Physiochemical parameters like pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, ions, and heavy metals affect thermal spring quality. Elevated temperatures accelerate interaction with minerals of the rocks, which may result in elevated levels of dissolved solids, minerals, and gases depending on the geology of the area [1,2].
In Lentas, southern Crete, within a sequence of exotic rocks (gneisses, ophiolites, granitoids, lavas, etc.) that structure the wider area, small, fissured aquifers were formed that are discharged from scattered sources. The main spring in the area is warm and has properties that were recognized and exploited for the establishment of the well-known homonymous Asclepieio (or Asklepieio) in the area. Asclepius was one of the most important healers of Ancient Greece. As a deity, his worship was widespread through several regions in the classical era, and has enjoyed exceptional popularity, especially during the Hellenistic and Greco-Roman eras. Moreover, in the 4th century BC and during the Roman and Byzantine eras, Levinaion was a famous centre for hydrotherapy, physiotherapy, and a psychiatric hospital [3]. At the beginning of the previous century, the archaeological dig found the remains of the ancient Asklepiion [4]. The therapeutical importance of the sacred spring in the Lentas area and the ancient Asclepius remains has survived to present times in Crete’s cultural tradition.
Literature studies show that major water parameters in thermal springs vary significantly due to differences in primary geochemistry, water temperature, and intense anthropogenic pressures observed worldwide. Compared to other water sources, the levels of electrical conductivity (EC), total dissolved solids (TDS), major anions and cations, and trace elements are higher. Warm water with a high mineral content and low dissolved oxygen supports therapeutic applications, including skin therapy, bone healing, soothing body aches, and gastrological diseases [2,5,6].
The paper deals with the comprehensive approach to managing reserves and hydrochemistry of an important archaeological site of global scope. The paper proceeds as follows: In the next section, we discuss the archaeological environment of Asclepieia and the diverse nature of archaeological evidence that brought to light the sacred spring of Asclepieion of Lentas. In Section 3, we present a geological outline of the Lentas area, and the hydrogeochemical status of water resources in this area with emphasis on the sacred spring of Asclepieion in the past and in the present. In Section 4, we describe our methodology for investigating both the physicochemical and hydrochemical status of the water sources in Lentas. In Section 5, we examine the impact of urban modernization on Lentas’ spring water resources by comparing hydrochemical data from the current spring and borehole with sacred spring data from the past. The remainder of the paper centres around our findings, future perspectives of research, and a proposal to bring back into operation the sacred spring of Lentas.

2. The Archaeological Environment of Asclepieia and the Asclepieion of Lentas

From the site of the sanctuaries of Asclepieia, it is obvious that the ancients paid much attention to the selection of a healthy and airy landscape to establish “sacred hospitals”, as confirmed by the archaeological evidence. Among the places where Asclepieia was founded in Crete is the area of Lentas, which is located in south-central Crete, on the southern outskirts of the Asterousia Mountains, an area of exceptional natural beauty and wonderful climate.

2.1. The Asclepieia

Nature played a very important role in people’s lives in ancient times. Not only were many activities connected to the outdoors, but human life itself was closely connected to nature. In many cases, nature was the solution to peoples’ illnesses. Even before the time of Hippocrates, people had associated the beneficial effect of mild climate changes on certain diseases. Not infrequently, autonomous natural factors such as climate and water present greater therapeutic value than any other therapeutic agent. Since good health in ancient times was very important due to the high mortality rate, the healing process was entrusted to the gods, and healing places were considered sacred in ancient Greece. The natural elements that contributed to healing were personified and surrounded with respect [7]. For over a millennium, patients and pilgrims from all over the Mediterranean world seeking healing and health travelled to these holy places dedicated to Asclepius. Through several approaches, there is strong evidence that Asclepieia adopted a more holistic approach to treating physical and mental ailments, combining medical practices with improving the psychological state of the patients through their stay in a pleasant and healthy environment. Among the places that hosted these sanctuaries of worship and healing was the island of Crete. Over time, archaeological digging and research have brought numerous and varied evidence for worshipping the god Asclepius and other deities in various places in Crete [8]. Despite the indications, the number of Asclepieia established and that offered their services over time in Crete still needs to be discovered. The exact number of Asclepieia in the broader region of Asterousia remains unknown; on the southern outskirts of the region, one of the most famous Asclepieia of the wider Mediterranean area was founded and operated from antiquity until the beginning of the Byzantine period, the Asclepieion of Lentas [4]. Edelstein and Edelstein [9] recognized a relationship between the worship of Asclepius and springs. Earlier research has broadly accepted these two views uncritically and generally advocated a ‘healthy’ location for Asclepieia outside the city, in the open countryside, at high altitudes, and/or at springs [10]. The study of medicine and its relationship with sanitation emerged alongside the religious-oriented approach of the Asclepieia. Initially, these were healing sanctuaries, but later on, they also functioned as medical schools and hospitals. During the Classical period, approximately 500 Asclepieia provided medical services. Each Asclepieion had basic elements that included a clean source of water and related infrastructure for utilizing the water. The available written documentation suggests that a clean water source was a key element of the Asclepieia. The close relationship between thermal springs, Asclepius, and medicine is well known [11,12].

2.2. The Asclepieion of Lenta in Asterousia

The first scientific investigations carried out in the area of the sanctuary were those of the members of the Italian archaeological mission to Crete in 1884–1984 under the supervision of Federico Halbherr, who, impressed by the large number of inscriptions and other objects provided by the area, created conditions for subsequent archaeological excavations. In addition to the discovery of the Asclepeiion, these excavations yielded rich archaeological material related to the management of water resources in the area and continued in August and October 1900. Further excavations, investigations, and studies took place during the years 1910, 1912, and 1913. There are various notable discoveries uncovered during the excavation, including the remains of the temple (Figure 1, site 2), one of the two sacred springs (Figure 1, site 1), a magnificent marble staircase (site 5), and the back wall of a portico (site 3). The stoa or attached building with external arches was also found, which Taramelli believes to be a Nymphaeum (Figure 1, site 3). Figure 1 displays the location of each site [4].
There is a room in the building that is roughly square in shape and protrudes from its central body. The room’s thick walls, which are covered with hydraulic mortar, suggest that it was likely used as a cistern or water storage area. The earthenware, mosaic floors, and hydro mortar coatings found in multiple rooms of this grand building suggest it may have functioned as a spa-like facility, complete with private bathrooms in each bedroom. According to Melfi’s monography, there seems to be a connection between the building and an aqueduct arm located approximately 20 m northwest of it. Unfortunately, the modern road has almost completely erased any remaining traces of the aqueduct [13]. Just a bit south of the spring lies a discovery of large basins, neatly aligned in an east-to-west formation. These basins were constructed with intricate brickwork and covered in concrete plaster. Figure 1 shows that two of these tanks are located next to each other at location 6. These tanks were connected by an internal terracotta pipe that measures 7.5 × 1.60 m and were suitable for full immersion baths. It is believed that the steep rocky slopes near the sea on both capes had rock cuts that served as freshwater collection sites for feeding the ships docked at Lebena. Based on Halbherr’s excavation diary from 1910, it was discovered that the area contained unsightly walls, rooms with floors, and a system of aqueducts and pipes. The findings suggest that it was a small community of nursing homes equipped with facilities such as baths, immersions, and comparable amenities [4].

3. The Geological and Hydrogeological Outline

Greece, like many other Mediterranean countries, is rich in thermal or/and mineral waters. Such wealth is because the greater part of this country is located in an area that is geo-dynamically very active, and where both the high mountain ranges and active fault systems allow the precipitation, circulation, and rapid rise of meteoric originated deep waters, mainly along the boundaries of the main tectonic structures. As is well known, these dynamics are a consequence of crustal shortening caused by the northward movement of the African plate towards the Eurasian plate. Compressive tectonics causing the thrusting of predominantly sedimentary nappes, as well as the overlapping of relatively stable crystalline basemen and tensional tectonic phases that followed during the Neogene and Quaternary led, in combination with the alternating lithostratigraphy, to the formation of hundreds of aquifers and thousands of springs scattered throughout the country. The External Hellenides almost exclusively constitute the island of Crete without missing parts of the internal Hellenides referred to as the Uppermost Nappe and expose a complex nappe structure as a whole (Figure 2). The lack of recent volcanism in Crete led to the absence of hot springs on the island without ruling out the occurrence of hypothermic mineral springs. One of them is located in the area of Lentas and is, as has been described, connected with the sanctuary of Asclepios in the area for thousands of years [14].
The Asclepieio of Lentas is located in the southern part of Crete, specifically on the outskirts of Asterousia in the south-central region (Figure 3). Taramelli described that the area between Cape Leo (now Kefalas) and Cape Psammidomouri had three waterways—the eastern, western, and central rivers—during the initial excavations of the Italian archaeological mission. It is probable that the first two rivers existed in ancient times. The central river, which flows from north to south and divides the holy structures, was not present during the city’s occupation and probably formed after the city was deserted due to seasonal water flow [13].
Nowadays, in the area, there are no rivers that flow constantly, but water streams do appear from time to time. The geological map shows that there are small discharges or springs scattered around, with names like Skolia and Kefalovrysa. Kefalovrysa springs are known to vanish after appearing on the surface and reappear at lower altitudes, typically near the coast of the sea. Nevertheless, the most significant spring in the area is the sacred spring (of Asclepieion). Lenta experiences a transitional climate from Mediterranean to desert, with dry summers and mild winters. This area receives an average annual rainfall of 400 mm, making it a suitable location for the establishment.

3.1. Outline of the Geology of the Area

In the study area, the origin and significance of the Lentas Unit/Series is still subject to controversy. A polygenic conglomerate with reworking middle Permian limestones that evolves into dm- to m-bedded breccias plays a decisive role in interpreting the Lentas unit. Davi and Bonneau [16] were the first to describe the Lentas unit and proposed a Triassic age for the limestones, but it is possible that they are from an older age (Permian). In the geological section of the existing basic geological map for the area, on a scale of 1:50,000, along the line A-A1, which is located in the broader area of interest (Figure 4), it is considered that the impermeable formations that allow the formation of aquifers are either the flysch of the Tripoli zone or flysch of the Pindos zone (Supplementary Material S2) [16]. Thorbecke [17] states that the Lentas unit is an Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous olistolith within the Pindos second flysch unit (Oligocene). Vachard et al. [18] focus on the Misellina Zone (latest Kungurian) identified in reworked blocks within a conglomerate in the Lentas unit, and suggest that the Lentas unit could represent the base of the Pindos sequence.
Apart from the intersections along the main roads that lead to the settlement of Lentas, there are no other natural or artificial intersections in the broader area. In addition, a strong topographical relief prevails. The combination of the superior leads to a limitation in the observation and collection of geological data. As a result of this, the proposed views are interpretations. The sediments that make up the hill on which the Asklepieion structures are built can be seen in the small natural and technical sections that exist north and south of the hill (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Photographs have been taken at the same level along the road, approximately 350 m left and right, north of the entrance to Asklepiion (Figure 5a, Figure 5b, Figure 6a, Figure 6b, respectively). Two different research groups have characterized the sediments in Figure 5a,b as either a possible flyschoid formation [16] or a breccia with intercalated tuffs [18]. In contrast, in Figure 6a,b, the sediments have been designated as Quaternary sediments [16]. About one kilometre east of the entrance of Asklepiion (Figure 7a,b), a formation characterized as cobblestone appears to be part of the Quaternary sediments.
Lebena was constructed on an alluvial fan developed on a terrace. In the wider area, there are scattered fragments of gneiss of Asterousia Nappe, and ophiolites of the upper tectonic units of the inner zones of Hellenides, and rocks of the Lentas series. Within the alluvial fan is a conglomerate formation with a thickness of more than 10 m. The conglomerate and pebbles are composed of quartz, limestone, granite, ophiolite, and schist. This formation continues with thick polygenic breccias. The volcanic rework clastic matrix is dark grey, with alteration from red to green. The breccia clasts are comparable to those from the conglomerate, and the distinction between the two lithologies is impossible. The main difference is the larger size of the clasts (up to several metres in diameter) in the breccias. Another interpretation has recently been proposed [19]. This conglomerate can be interpreted as being formed within the terrace, as part of an alluvial slope, or from the two ephemeral rivers that ran through the area and were mentioned by the first excavators.

3.2. The Springs and the Hydrogeological Regime in the Area

As can be seen from the geological map of the study area, small size aquifers developed in the fractured gneissic rocks discharge through several springs, located on the northern perimeter of the settlement within the Alpine Formations. There is hydraulic communication between the aquifer of fractured rocks and the aquifer developed in Quaternary deposits, maintaining a continuous flow of the spring close to Asclepieion. Besides this spring, until a century ago, there was a second spring south of the place of the sacred spring, about eight meters from the beach. The spring, referred to as the “small spring”, always had a minimal supply and ran dry first. Its temperature was measured in 1915 at 21 °C. It was also hypothermic. In the studies that followed, no reference is made to this source [3,15].
The outlet of the sacred spring (Figure 8) was found directly in front of the nymphaeum, 3.50 m below its level. It was an old cult nucleus that was wholly redesigned during Roman times and roofed with a brick arch. Perhaps it was only later transferred to this place from another; according to an inscription, the spring had dried up at a particular time, but was rediscovered through God’s vision and with a sacred serpent’s help. Further east of the retaining wall, at an altitude of 39.96 m, is the access to the sacred spring with masonry, built directly into the ground leading to an underground compartment, dug into the slope, and is now completely inaccessible. It is believed that the spring water collection channels were placed in this compartment, as shown in Figure 8b. The facade of the source has a general east-west orientation and measures 2.7 m in length and 2 m in maximum height. Two thick walls, oriented towards the north and slightly diverging from each other, flank the facade and define an access corridor (Figure 8d).
The preserved west wall stands at a maximum height of 1.40 m and is over 1 m thick. Its construction technique is a mix of styles, indicating multiple interventions over time. It appears that only the first row of the original building to the west of the access arch has been preserved. The construction consists of regular-shaped blocks of yellowish limestone, which were placed without adhesive mortar. Based on photographs taken during the initial excavations conducted by the Italian expedition, it appears that the structure was constructed atop the same limestone that was buried beneath the ground level. The upper section of the masonry was constructed using the typical method of laying blocks with a cement centre, in contrast to the rest of the arch’s eastern side, which shares the same characteristic. The spring could be accessed through a small brick arch that was added at a later time.
In the 1960s, a small tank with dimensions of 0.90 × 1.20 m continued to be fed by the historic source that had previously supplied thermal water to the Lebena healing centre. The source was located at an altitude of 25 m and approximately 200 m away from the coast [3]. Apart from the sacred spring in ancient Lebena, the settlement also had access to another water source called Kefalovrysa, which is still known by that name today (as shown in Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 9b).
The water was transported from about 4 km from the settlement by a stone-built pipeline, traces are still preserved today in various places [3]. The spring is located in the middle of a ravine called “the Minas”, at an elevation of 312 m above sea level. It is located within metamorphic and tectonically cataclastic rocks with an ultra-basic composition. Water is available all the time, but the amount is limited, especially during summer. This indicates that the source might discharge part of the larger aquifer in the area.
In the 1980s, and more specifically, in March 1989, a borehole (Figure 9a and Figure 10) was dug to meet the needs of the local community and the tourist stream that began to visit the beautiful beach and the ancient Asklepiion. Drilling penetrated Quaternary clastic formations and stopped at schists in the Lentas Series. The drilling of the borehole started at 35 m elevation, and the total drilling length is 33 m. The aquifer was located within the permeable conglomerate. After 18 h of pumping, the flow of the borehole was 20 m3/h, and the pumping level was 16 m. Today, the well has an exploitable flow of 10 m3/h and pumps water from 25 m (Supplementary Material S2).

4. Materials and Methods

The physicochemical characteristics and ion variations of water samples from two springs and one borehole in Lentas area were examined from 1915 to 2021. In this study, hydrochemical types were presented by the Piper, Schoeller, and Durov diagrams as effective tools for determining differentiations in chemical composition of water samples.

4.1. Sampling Site and In Situ Analysis of Water Samples

4.1.1. Sampling Site

To track and analyse changes in both physical attributes and ion content, water samples were gathered during both wet and dry periods. Water samples were collected from one spring and one borehole from March 2018 to May 2021. A dry and clean polyethylene plastic bottle was used to hold spring and borehole water. Before sampling, the sampling bottles were cleaned and rinsed 2–3 times with water to be taken and then filled to the top to minimize entrapment of air in water samples. To prepare for analysis, the samples underwent filtration using 0.45 μm filters and were stored in HDPE bottles. To preserve the aliquots for major and trace metal analyses, 2% HNO3 acidification was used. Water samples were stored in a portable fridge until they were transported to the HersLab laboratory (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete) for inorganic, main, and trace element analysis of water. Samples numbers and samples names are shown in Table 1.
For this study, we gathered water samples from two sites:
  • the borehole that has been providing water to Lentas since the 1989, and
  • the Kefalovrysa spring, which was used for drinking water in the settlement during historical times.
Unfortunately, we were unable to collect water from the sacred spring (Figure 9a, light blue arrow) due to its lack of discharge, resulting from the drilling that occurred in the 1989. The Kefalovrysa spring can be found in Mina’s ravine, east of Lenta, at an altitude of 312 m (Figure 9b), while the Lentas borehole is situated 70 m north of the sacred spring, at an altitude of 35 m (Figure 9b, blue arrow).
In addition, some historical hydrochemical data, from 1915 to 1957, were included from previous studies (Table 1) [3].

4.1.2. In Situ Measurements of Water Samples

We measured the temperature (T), pH, electrical conductivity (EC), and total dissolved solids (TDS) of water samples using portable instruments on site. The above parameters have been measured in the field using the HI-9811-5 Portable Meter (HANNA instruments). Calibration was always carried out before measurement using standards buffer solutions of pH 4.00 and 7.00, respectively. After being collected, the samples were transported to a hydrochemical laboratory in a mobile refrigerator at a temperature between 2.5 and 4.5 °C. Precautions were taken to prevent water contamination during collection, transport, and handling.

4.2. Analytical Methods for Elemental Composition

The water samples were analysed for various ions such as Na, Mg, Al, K, Cl, Ca, Fe, Li, F, B, Ba, Sr, V, Cr, Mn, Pb, Mo, Sb, Ni, U, Cu, Zn, As, and Se, as well as nutrients like N-NO3, N-NH3, and P-PO4. Additionally, the analysis determining the levels of total organic carbon (TOC), SiO2, SO4, NO2, NO3, CO3, NH4, and HCO3. The metals underwent analysis through inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using Agilent 7500-CX equipment (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). The amount of nutrients was measured through UV-VIS spectroscopy, which involved using a HACH 2800DR spectrophotometer (Methods: LCK311, LCK153, LCK339, 8051, 8038 developed by HACH LANGE, Düsseldorf, Germany). The laboratory follows standardized quality assurance and quality control (QAQC) procedures with 10% of the samples as duplicates, standard additions where necessary, and blank correction procedures. Aq.QA 1.5.0., 2020, (RockWare Inc., Golden, CO, USA) was used for data analysis and visualization. Of note, the software Aq.QA 1.5.0 calculates the predominant water type.

4.3. Radon Estimation in Borehole Water and Spring Water

As part of our current study, we conducted an analysis of the radon levels found in water samples collected from two distinct areas in Lenta: the Lenta borehole and Kefalovrysa spring. To measure these levels, we utilized an electronic Radon detector (RTM-1688-2, SARAD GmbH, Dresden, Germany). The RTM-1688-2 is an active detector and belongs to the category of instruments with a continuous recording method, as it enables its user to monitor in real-time the variation of the concentration of 222Rn in the air passing through it. For the examination of water samples, the measuring arrangement of the instrument includes a pump to extract the radon by disturbing the water and driving the air current into the meter. The sample is aspirated by a pump built into the device (0.25 L/min), and the measurement is made in a chamber with a semiconductor detector. The measured quantity is the content in Bq/m3. At the same time, the readings from the temperature and atmospheric pressure sensors, also integrated into the device, are measured and recorded in the device’s memory. The water samples were obtained from flowing water, as seen in Figure 9a,b.

5. Results

5.1. Physico-Chemical Characteristics of the Borehole and Spring Waters of Lentas

The data from both wet and dry periods, including temperature (T), pH, redox potential (Eh), total organic carbon (TOC), electrical conductivity (EC), and total dissolved solids (TDS) for all water samples (Lentas borehole and Kefalovrysa spring) were analysed and presented in Table 1, alongside historical data for comparison [3].
The laboratory analysis results for all water samples, including major ion chemistry and other elements, are depicted in Table 2. Additionally, Table 3 presents the results obtained from the laboratory analysis for all water samples, including trace elements. Figure 11 presents the ratio plots for sodium vs. chloride, sulfate vs. chloride, and sulfate vs. sodium from water samples from the study area. Figure 12 and Figure 13 display the ion balance diagrams of the Lentas borehole and spring water samples, respectively. Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 display the Piper [20], Scholler [21], and Durov [22] diagrams, respectively.
The analysis reveals increased Na+, Cl, and SO42− content in the sacred spring (historical data) and the current borehole water (Table 2, Figure 11). The analysis data reveals an increase in Na+, Cl, and SO42− content in the current borehole water (Na+avg = 117.3; SO42−avg = 132.4 Clavg = 159.1) in comparison to the sacred spring (historical data) (Na+avg = 85.3; SO42−avg = 77.6, Clavg = 138.7). From the concentration data of the three main ions, there appears to be an average increase of 32.0 mg/L in Na+, 54.8 mg/L in SO42−, and 20.4 mg/L in Cl, within four recent years. These data indicate that the water from the sacred spring and the current borehole are slightly different. Although the data are limited, they show a trend that needs interpretation. When analysing the ion balance plots (Figure 12 and Figure 13), we noticed that the springs have more consistent values compared to the borehole. The borehole, on the other hand, shows greater variability with a larger standard deviation (see Supplementary Material S4). This suggests that the water chemistry of the borehole is more strongly influenced by frequent use, particularly during the spring season when pumping is more frequent. All these observations are depicted in the plots of Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16. In addition, in Table 1, it is observed that the Mg2+ in the holy spring during the historical measurements and in the measurements in the borehole water remain constant, while the content of Ca2+ fluctuates. The maximum value of the content of calcium ions in the warm period of 2019 is 110.7 mg/L, almost twice the average value (61 mg/L) of historical measurements.
Although the whole spectrum of trace elements was analysed as shown in Table 3, a limited number of detectable trace elements were identified. However, the periodically relatively increased concentration of the trace elements Zn, Cu, and Se is of interest.
The Piper trilinear diagram is a widely used method for determining groundwater and springs. It plots the hydrochemical composition of waters to identify their features, volume, and processes affecting them [20,23,24]. Two main hydrochemical types were recognized: Na-Cl and Mg-HCO3. These two types, like each type (or facies), are related to geological processes that determine the hydrochemistry of the aquifers. Determining factors are the rate of chemical weathering (surface and underground) of the rocks in the geological basin, the distance travelled by surface and underground water, the type of aquifer, and above all, the residence time within the aquifer. Although some of the sacred spring and borehole water samples fall within the range of mixed water type, they were calculated to the closest type, sodium chloride. The analysed Kefalovrysa spring water samples were classified as Mg-HCO3. Thus, there are two main distinctive types of water samples: (1) Na-Cl type for Lentas historical spring waters (Tavg = 22.6 °C, TDSavg = 554) and Lentas borehole waters (Tavg = 23.5 °C, ECavg = 1062 μS/cm, TDSavg = 518); and (2) Mg-HCO3 for Kefalovrysa spring waters (Tavg = 22.1 °C, ECavg = 590 μS/cm, TDSavg = 290). The only exception to this is the Lentas spring water in 1915, which was indicated as Na-HCO3-Cl type, a mixed type. The Mg–HCO3 type includes the spring waters that mainly discharge the ophiolitic mélange, since minerals rich in magnesium are typical for this formation [25]. Water samples from post-orogenic basins showed they belonged to the Na–HCO3 water type. Their TDS content is lower than that of the type of Na-Cl waters in which Na is considered to originate either: (a) from mixing with seawater or (b) from the increased ability to alter the water due to the high CO2 concentration, which favours the solubility of alkaline elements from silicate rocks [26]. The Piper diagram and resulting water types are shown in Figure 14 and Table 1.
The Schoeller diagram depicts the content of the main anions and cations for each water sample on a semi-logarithmic scale. These values are joined by a checkered line, the shape of which allows a direct “visual” comparison of the different types of water (Figure 15). Due to the semi-logarithmic scale, a wide range of content can be displayed. Altering the composition of a water type causes the checkered line to move vertically without changing its original shape. The positive of this method is the sharp visualization of a small number of samples. The disadvantage of this is the comparison of a large number of samples, which leads to the loss of the sharpness of the projection, and by extension, to the loss of the individual and particular patterns [21]. As shown in the Schoeller diagram, there are two distinct types of water based on the content of chloride, calcium, magnesium, and sulfates (Figure 15). Within one of the two types of water, there are differences in the content of the main elements, e.g., sodium, chloride, and sulfates, that result in changing of the ion content—even though the water samples were obtained from the same aquifer, i.e., in the past from the sacred spring and in the present from the borehole.
The Durov diagram is a composite plot that consists of two ternary diagrams. The diagram shows the cations of interest plotted against the anions of interest, with data normalized to 100%. The sides of the diagram form a binary plot of total cation vs. total anion concentrations. The binary plot now includes TDS (mg/L) and pH data for better comparisons. The Durov diagram [22,27] clusters data points with similar chemical compositions and reveals relationships and properties for large sample groups. This method evaluates the effect of geochemical processes on groundwater type and presents concentrations (total or absolute) of selected parameters, such as cations, ions, pH, and TDS. Figure 10 shows that one geochemical process impacts water genesis in this study area. Both in Piper and Durov diagrams it is clear the elevated content of Cl- from the same aquifer according to historical (sacred spring) and present data (borehole). In the Durov diagram it is clearly seen that the two different types have different TDS (Figure 16).
The observed two types of water are two of the four main types (Ca–HCO3 type, Mg–HCO3 type, Na–HCO3 type, Na–Cl type) found in the thermal springs of Greece [1,28]. These two types of water are found in two different aquifers in the study area: the Mg-HCO3 water type in a fissure-type aquifer in the alpine rocks, and the Na-Cl water type in a porous aquifer in post-alpine sediments. Geological formations vary in their groundwater storage and flow capacities, which can range from a few square kilometres to thousands. Aquifer types differ in their unit storage capacity and saturated thickness, resulting in a wide range of groundwater flow potential. The hydrogeological diversity of aquifer types is characterized by significant variations in storability and transmissivity, depending on the type of sediment/rocks and depositional environment [29]. As can be seen from Figure 4, the extent and dimensions of the aquifer in the post-alpine formations are much smaller than their counterparts in the alpine formations, even at the catchment.

5.2. Radon Estimation in Borehole Water and Spring Water

Besides the above analysis, radon was also measured in specific water samples. The measured value of radon concentration in five water samples collected from the Lenta borehole and the Kefalovrysa spring are tabulated in Table 4. From Table 4, it is clearly seen that the measured radon concentration in all water samples varies from 335 to 2005 Bq/m3 with a mean value of 897 Bq/m3.
A question that should be answered is what mechanism increases the temperature of the spring. The source is not directly connected to faults, at least. So, all that remains is to examine the hypothesis of the increased geothermal gradient in the area. A rise in the local geothermal gradient could increase radioactive concentrations. Some thermal mineral waters in Greece are naturally radioactive. In some cases, these waters are seen as having beneficial health effects, such as the well-known Ikaria Mineral Springs. Many of the rocks in the Earth’s crust are radioactive. Igneous, and especially granites, are the richest in radioactivity. The mineral waters that pass through these rocks pick up radioactive elements and become radioactive. The broader area of Lentas is composed of gneisses that also contain granite intrusions. In order to examine this hypothesis, the radon concentration values were measured in the waters of the Lentas borehole and the spring in Kefalovrysa. The low radon concentration was confirmed by the measurement of activity concentrations of 238U, 234U, 210Pb, and 210Po in the context of the study of groundwaters in Crete carried out on a water sample from the Lentas borehole Bh-1 (Table 5) [30].
According to the national regulations for drinking water, which have been established by the European Union (3.0 Bq/L 238U, 2.8 Bq/L 234U, 0.2 Bq/L 210Pb, and 0.1 Bq/L 210Po) as well as by the W.H.O. (10 Bq/L 238U, 1 Bq/L 234U 0.1 Bq/L 210Pb, and 0.1 Bq/L 210Po), the activity concentrations of all the samples can be characterized as radiologically negligible due to how they are all far lower than the above guidance levels [31,32]. This also means that their input’s radiological/thermal impact on aquatic systems is also of minor importance. A possible mechanism for the increase in the temperature of the spring could be the small annual fluctuations of the external temperature in the area in combination with the large heat capacity of the almost homogeneous rocks of the wider area, within which the aquifer that feeds the spring is located.
As demonstrated in Table 4, the measured radon concentration in all the drinking water samples (from the borehole) is found to be well within the safe limit recommended by United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR, 2008) [33].

6. Discussion

The study’s scope is to present in a comprehensive approach the archaeological, geological, and hydrochemical evidence of the area’s water resource management, compare hydrochemical data from 1915 to 2021, highlight incipient groundwater salinization along the Lentas coast, and propose a sustainable solution through the management of sporadic small water springs in the region.
Almost a century ago, the thermometallic springs in Greece were recorded in an attempt to highlight their healing properties in a simplistic, empirical way. Out of the 750 sources that were documented, over a hundred were found in Crete [15]. In this first record, a special mention was given to the spring of the ancient Asclepius in Lentas, also known as the ancient Lebena. According to Marinatos, even before archaeologists discovered the Lebenaion, Lentas (formerly Lebenaion) was renowned in Crete as a destination for individuals seeking treatment for stomach ailments (Marinatos in [3]). This spring has sodium chloride at a temperature of 22 °C and was widely used for medicinal purposes during the ancient, Roman, and Byzantine eras. According to the historical text of Lekkas [15], it is crucial to prioritize the study and monitoring of the source in Lentas, particularly the six sources in Crete, and including the Lentas spring of Miamos.
To this end, we examine water samples from various sources in the Lentas region at different times. The goal is to compare the results with previous analyses conducted since the early 1900s (Table 1). However, the most recent water sample was not taken from the sacred spring as in the past. Instead, it was retrieved from a borehole dug in 1989, located about 70 m north of the spring (Figure 9, upper panel). Comparing the measurements and analyses made over time (1915–2021, Table 1), the water from the borehole/spring has a neutral to alkaline pH ranging from 6.9 to 7.8.
Since the beginning of the previous century, measurements have consistently shown that the spring of Lentas water is hypothermic. The chemical composition of the water shows that the source is alkaline, determined by the content of calcium and magnesium bicarbonates, whose ratio is about 2:1. That is, magnesium is found in a greater proportion than typical drinking water. The sodium chloride content is relatively higher. The results of the analyses made over 42 years (1915–1957) showed that the composition of the spring water was relatively stable. A newer result added by the above study is the presence of traces of arsenic (0.00097 mg As = 0.0018 mg HAsO4 = 0.0014 mg HAsO2). In their opinion, the Lentas spring should be classified as a healing spring because of its alkaline properties that produce calcium and magnesium hydrocarbonate salts, as well as the presence of arsenic traces [3]. According to Makris and Masmanidou [3], Lentas spring water was found to have a resemblance, to some extent, with the thermal springs of Wieseubad Ludwigsquelle and Badenweiler in Germany; these springs were known for their therapeutic properties and were used for treating conditions like indigestion, cachexia, and neurasthenia.
Monitoring of the physicochemical characteristics of main and trace elements in the springs of Lentas was conducted in a recent study [19] in order to enable a comparison of recent measurements of water data with historical ones. Thus, in this study, we present the updated results of the water monitoring in the Lentas area. According to this, two hydrogeochemical water types were identified among the samples using the Piper diagram. Samples are classified into (a) the Mg-HCO3 water type for the Kefalovrysa spring; and (b) the mixed Na-HCO3-Cl and subsequently the Na-Cl water type initially for the waters of the sacred spring and for the borehole waters in Lentas, i.e., there is a shift from a bicarbonate to a chloride type. The sacred spring water’s original mixed composition Na-HCO3-Cl from 1915 has not reappeared, and there is not enough evidence for comparison. Therefore, the second water type is Na-Cl, which dominates in porous aquifer within the quarternary sediments. The Mg-HCO3 water type dominates groundwater found within the gneisses and overlying ophiolites. The water–ultramafic rock interaction typically produces slightly alkaline to strongly alkaline pH conditions because of the absorption of dissolved CO2 from atmospheric water in the serpentine and olivine. The pH values that characterized the studied Kefalovrysa spring varied from 7.6 to 8.4, indicating slightly alkaline conditions typical of groundwater interacting with ultramafic and carbonate rocks [34]. As can be seen in the Schoeller diagram, the contents of SO42−, Ca2+, and Cl ions in the waters of the Kefalovrysa spring are lower than in the waters of the sacred spring and also in the borehole in Lentas. In contrast, the content of Mg2+ is higher. When groundwater from a fractured-bedrock aquifer flows through clay-rich alluvial fan deposits, it undergoes several geochemical processes. The chemical composition of this groundwater is heavily influenced by water–rock interactions that occur along its flow paths. Factors such as the flow path length, the presence of organic matter, the reactivity of soluble salts, the rate of chemical weathering of silicates, and ion-exchange rates all impact groundwater chemistry. Factors suggested to explain the source of salt include evaporation, evapotranspiration, cation-exchange reactions on clays, solution of existing salt, and wetting/drying processes [35]. This natural process is slow and long-term and is not affected on the time scale of decades without significant anthropogenic influence. In the area, there are no intensive crops, only tourist activity in the broader area of the settlement (Figure 3).
Groundwaters in clastic formations show an increasing trend of calcium against sodium. This trend may be explained by the dissolution of calcium carbonate minerals in calcareous rocks and shale, and reactions in the alluvium fan deposits. The excess of sodium over chloride by ion exchange could be explained similarly. However, these values are not certified in the analyses of waters in Lentas. So, another reason should be sought for the variation of the TDS value over time in the sacred spring and the borehole in Lentas.
The measurement of groundwater quality in coastal regions is complex due to the various input sources, including precipitation, seawater, and domestic and agricultural influences. Among the sources of influence mentioned above, seawater intrusion is the most widespread problem that makes groundwater resources unfit for domestic utilities. In order to gain insight into seawater intrusion and similar concerns, it is crucial to uncover the fundamentals of salinity through hydrogeochemical analysis [36]. Na-Cl ratios in samples from coastal aquifers have been used effectively to probe the mechanisms controlling water pollution in coastal areas worldwide. If the Na/Cl ratio relative to the EC value of the sample is constant (i.e., no fluctuation), this is displayed as a horizontal line [35]. In this case, horizontal lines indicate the effective contribution of evaporation and evapotranspiration. The Na/Cl ratio plot in Figure 11 suggests that samples analysed nearly a few decades apart have apparent differences that cannot be attributed to evaporation effects. Additionally, a simultaneous increase in the content of Ca, Na, Cl, SO4, and F ions is interpreted as a transient but beginning salinization in the area. A possible interpretation could be the incipient seawater intrusion in the area. This may be due to the intensification of pumping with what this may entail. In addition to the differences between the chemistry of the two springs, the list of temperatures measured over time shows the hypothermic nature of the sacred spring, which does not exist today due to drilling. The presence of traces of arsenic was not verified during recent sampling. Nevertheless, it turns out that the thermal spring, i.e., the historically sacred spring of Asclepieion, is rich in other inorganic and beneficial trace elements, such as fluoride concentrations in mg/L and zinc in µg/L. However, there are substantial differences between the chemistry of these waters and those of Kefalovrysa. It is evident from these early data that the springs discharge aquifers located in a completely different geological environment. These new elements, combined with the historical ones, highlight the necessity to reoperate the sacred spring of the Asclepius of Lentas, which will add historical, social, and environmental value to the archaeological site.
Coastal aquifers are prone to pollution and, in particular, to salinization. The European Environment Agency has acknowledged that groundwater over-exploitation causing saltwater intrusion is a major threat to freshwater resources in European coastal areas [37,38]. Bearing in mind the definition of NBL as “the concentration of a substance or the value of an indicator in a body of groundwater corresponding to no, or only very minor, anthropogenic alterations to undisturbed conditions” according to the EU Groundwater Directive, the first step in assessing human impact on groundwater quality and identifying potentially contaminated groundwater in aquifer systems is establishing natural background levels (NBLs) of groundwater composition. The NBL of Cl, determined through different methods (e.g., simple interpolation/geostatistical methods, density-dependent solutions for groundwater flow investigations), can vary significantly from one aquifer to another. For instance, the natural background level (NBL) of chloride (Cl) in aquifers varies greatly in different countries. It can be as low as 10 mg/L in Finland or 13.2 mg/L in Latvia, but can reach up to 200 mg/L in Portugal [39,40]. Pulido-Velazquez performed and compared different statistical approaches to derive chloride NBLs from different hydrogeological settings across Europe based on five case studies conducted in coastal aquifers in the Atlantic Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, the North Sea, and the Baltic Sea; the estimated NBLs were below 85 mg/L, with one exception [39]. In our case, the historical data could be used as NBL reference for the coastal aquifer of Lentas.
Groundwater resources are crucial for economic and social development. Unfortunately, urbanization can lead to pollution and damage of spring water resources [41,42,43,44]. Most groundwater is used for irrigated agriculture. However, there is also significant urban water supply abstraction for both public and private supply [29], and inadequate attention is paid to the overuse of water in coastal regions due to enhanced tourism needs. Based on geological observation, and as can be seen from the geological map (Figure 4, Supplementary Material S2), there are several places with marked small water springs, some of which also have names (Kefalovrysa, Skolia) on the broader study area that have yet to be systematically studied or exploited. What is certain is that these aquifers also feed the coastal aquifer, from which the settlement of Lenda is supplied. Alternatively, to serve the needs of the settlement, the small springs in the broader area could be used and supply the settlement after a systematic study of the spatial distribution and water capacity of the aquifers they discharge. This step could also mark the restarting of the sacred spring of Lentas.
Modern tourism began with thermalism in the interwar period, and it is now making a global comeback. In Europe, thermal springs with curative powers have maintained a high reputation for their success in healing through thermalism [45,46]. As far as we know, a limited number of studies have explored the hydrological and hydrochemical changes in the aquifers of holy and sacred springs [47,48,49]. While it is known that mineral waters have been historically used to treat various ailments, there is a lack of understanding about the biological function of the components present in these waters that contribute to their therapeutic properties [50,51,52]. Recently, there has been a growing interest in utilizing preclinical models such as animal or in vitro studies to explore the various biological effects of balneotherapy on inflammation, immunity, cartilage and bone metabolism, as well as drinking cures on digestion [51]. As an example, the experimental animal study carried out by Crespo et al. [52] aimed to examine the impact of Lanjarón-Capuchina mineral water on the intestinal epithelium. This experimental model served as a prototype of sodium chloride-rich mineral waters that are used to treat digestive disorders. They observed through microscopic analysis that the intake of mineral water high in sodium chloride has a hypertonic effect on the intestinal epithelium [52]. It is crucial to note that the experimental outcomes observed are not necessarily universally applicable to all mineral waters rich in sodium chloride. Acknowledging that thermal waters are complex systems made up of a combination of various organic and inorganic compounds, more studies are necessary to reveal and understand the mechanisms of the action of drinking cures and balneotherapy. One way to approach this is by using computational tools to analyse large databases and generate evidence-based hypotheses on the impact of important elements in digestive, bone, and skin disorders. This can help guide further experimental research in these areas [53].

Limitations of the Study

The main limitations of our study are the small number of water samples, the lack of long-term follow-up of the borehole/spring, and the complete lack of other drillings in the area, which all limit the use of additional methodological approaches.

7. Conclusions

The area of Lentas with the remains of the ancient Asclepius in this location has been known for many decades for the sacred spring with its healing properties. In the context of the present study, we observed that there were no traces of arsenic in the Lentas borehole water, which contrasts with past data on Lentas sacred spring water. Additionally, both the Lentas borehole water and Kefalovrysa spring water had low levels of dissolved radon. Also, we found that the water from both the sacred spring and borehole of Lentas has a timeless, constant, and hypothermic nature. Apart from the stable nature of the hypothermic spring and the relatively elevated TDS values, we also observed fluctuations in zinc values. We did not identify any other prominent mineral elements that could account for the therapeutic properties of the spring. Lastly, the main findings reported here are the changes observed in the chemical composition by comparing the historical reference data of the sacred spring water with the current measurement data from the borehole water. A possible factor in the change in the chemical composition of the aquifer water in the short period of the last few decades is incipient salinization due to the over-pumping of the relatively small aquifer in the area to serve the ever-increasing residential and tourist development in the area, especially during the arid summer months. The recorded historical data, i.e., from 1915 to 1957, due to the absence of substantial anthropogenic activity in the area, are proposed as reference values (NBL) for the Lentas area.
Our study analyses the historical and current hydrogeological data of a coastal area in combination with the archaeological data of the region. The aim of this study is to highlight the issue of initial flooding and encourage the local authorities to take necessary measures to counteract this pan-European problem in coastal aquifers. The immediate measures that can be taken are the systematic sampling, chemical analysis, and evaluation of the water to effectively intervene in periods of intense water usage. In the specific area, water transport from peripheral springs—like the one in Kefalovrysa—to the settlement was used historically to supply the settlement with drinking water. The results of this case study can be applied to other archaeological sites in Greek and European areas as well as internationally to ensure the sustainable management of the “drinking water”, especially in provincial archaeological sites that receive enormous tourist pressure in limited periods.
Protecting the Asklepiion spring in the Lenda region requires slowing down the increase in major ion concentration in the aquifer water. This will preserve the hydrochemical character of the sacred spring water, which is historically known to have therapeutical properties. It will also ensure the resumption of the water flow of the sacred spring of Asklepiion, contributing to the full protection of the healing and cultural character of the Lenda area.
The region of Lenda lies on the southern slopes of the Asterousia Mountain. The area was recently included in the UNESCO “Man and Biosphere (MAB)” program in 2020, which aims to enhance the bond between humans and their environment through global interdisciplinary research and development [54]. This recognition highlights the inherent value of both the natural and cultural heritage within the broader region. The findings of this study are directed towards protecting and preserving this heritage for the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/geosciences14030056/s1, Supplementary Material S1: Historical map of the distribution of thermometallic springs in Crete; Supplementary Material S2: Geological map of the area; Supplementary Material S3: Drilling protocol; Supplementary Material S4: Statistical data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.; methodology, E.M. and E.S.B.; formal analysis, E.M.; investigation, E.M. and E.S.B.; resources, E.M.; visualization, E.M. and E.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.; writing—review and editing, E.M. and E.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Our warm thanks to all those who contributed to this work and especially the local authorities of Lentas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lambrakis, N.; Kallergis, G. Contribution to the study of Greek thermal springs: Hydrogeological and hydrochemical characteristics and origin of thermal waters. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13, 506–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chalise, B.; Paudyal, P.; Kunwar, B.B.; Bishwakarma, K.; Thapa, B.; Pant, R.R.; Neupane, B.B. Water quality and hydrochemical assessments of thermal springs, Gandaki Province, Nepal. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Makris, K.; Masmanidou, Z. The Lenda Source of Crete; Publications of the Pharmaceutical Department of the University of Thessaloniki: Thessaloniki, Greece, 1958; Volume 4, p. 112. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pernier, L.; Banti, L. Guida Degli Scavi Italiani in Creta—Rom; Ministero Della Pubblica Istruzione: Rome, Italy, 1947. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nasermoaddeli, A.; Kagamimori, S. Balneotherapy in medicine: A review. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2005, 10, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Albertini, M.C.; Dacha, M.; Teodori, L.; Conti, M.E. Drinking mineral waters: Biochemical effects and health implications–the state-of-the-art. Int. J. Environ. Health 2007, 1, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marantou, E. Die Kraft der Natur und die Hilfe der Gottheiten: Heilorte als Kultplätze in der Peloponnes; NAC 44; 2015; pp. 51–68. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/25078895/Die_Kraft_der_Ntur_und_die_Hilfe_der_Gottheiten_Heilorte_als_Kultplätze_in_der_Peloponnes (accessed on 18 May 2023).
  8. Sporn, K. Heiligtümer und Kulte Kretas in Klassischer und Hellenistischer Zeit. Studien zu Antiken Heiligtümern, Bd. 3; Dissertation, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg: Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Edelstein, E.; Edelstein, L. Asclepius: A Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies; The Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore MD, USA, 1945. [Google Scholar]
  10. Riethmüller, J.W. Asklepios: Heiligtümer und Kulte, Studien zu Antiken Heiligtümern; Verlag Archäologie und Geschichte: Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 2, pp. 392–502. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mironidou-Tzouveleki, M.; Tzitzis, P.M. Medical practice in the ancient Asclepeion in Kos island. Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2014, 17, 167–170. [Google Scholar]
  12. Angelakis, A.N.; Antoniou, G.P.; Yapijakis, C.; Tchobanoglous, G. History of Hygiene Focusing on the Crucial Role of Water in the Hellenic Asclepieia (i.e., Ancient Hospitals). Water 2020, 12, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Melfi, M. Il Santuario di Asclepio a Lebena, SAIA—Annuario della Scuola Archeologica Italiana di Atene e Monografie; Giorgio Bretschneider: Rome, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobshagen, V. Geologie von Griechenland; Gebrüder Borntraeger: Berlin, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lekkas, N. The 750 Mineral Springs of Greece; National Printing Office: Athens, Greece, 1938; pp. 1–292. (In Greek) [Google Scholar]
  16. Davi, E.; Bonneau, M. Basic geological map of Greece. In Antiscarion Sheet, 1:50,000; Institute of Geology and Mineral Exploration (IGME): Athens, Greece, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  17. Thorbecke, G. Zur Zonengliederung der Aegaeischen Helleniden und Westlichen Tauriden; Special Issue, 2; Mitt. Ges. Geol. Bergbaustud. Österr. (Hg): Wien, Österreich, Austria, 1987; pp. 1–161. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vachard, D.; Vandelli, A.; Moix, P. Discovery of the Misellina Zone (latest Kungurian) in the Lentas unit of the Pindos Series (Crete). Geobios 2013, 46, 521–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Manoutsoglou, E. The thermal springs of Asklipieions in Crete, Greece. In Proceedings of the 11th Hydrogeological Conference of Greece, Athens, Greece, 4–6 October 2017; pp. 279–290. (In Greek). [Google Scholar]
  20. Piper, A.M. A Graphic Procedure in the Geochemical Interpretation of Water-Analyses. Eos. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 1944, 25, 914–928. [Google Scholar]
  21. Schoeller, H. Geochemistry of groundwater. In Groundwater Studies—An International Guide for Research and Practice; Chapter 15; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1977; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Durov, S.A. Natural waters and graphical representation of their composition: Doklady Akademii Nauk. USSR 1948, 59, 87–90. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chebbah, L.; Kabour, A. Hydrochemical evaluation of spring’s water in Mila Wilaya, North-East Algeria. Water Pract. Technol. 2023, 18, 1617–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhat, S.U.; Dar, S.A.; Hamid, A.A. Critical appraisal of the status and hydrogeochemical characteristics of freshwater springs in Kashmir Valley. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Matiatos, I.; Alexopoulos, A. Analysis of temporal hydrochemical and isotopic variations in spring waters of Eastern Peloponnesus (Greece). Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 2013, 47, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vigni, L.L.; Daskalopoulou, K.; Calabrese, S.; Kyriakopoulos, K.; Parello, F.; Brugnone, F.; D’Alessandro, W. Geochemical characterisation of the thermo-mineral waters of Greece. Environ. Geochem. Health 2022, 44, 2111–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ravikumar, P.; Somashekar, R.K.; Prakash, K.L. A comparative study on usage of Durov and Piper diagrams to interpret hydrochemical processes in groundwater from SRLIS river basin, Karnataka, India. Elixir Earth Sci. 2015, 80, 31073–31077. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dotsika, E.; Dalampakis, P.; Spyridonos, E.; Diamantopoulos, G.; Karalis, P.; Tassi, M.; Raco, B.; Arvanitis, A.; Kolios, N.; Michelot, J.L. Chemical and isotopic characterization of the thermal fluids emerging along the North-Northeastern Greece. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Foster, S.S.; Chilton, P.J. Groundwater: The processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 1957–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Xarchoulakos, D.C.; Manoutsoglou, E.; Kallithrakas-Kontos, N.G. Distribution of uranium isotopes, 210Pb and 210Po in groundwaters of Crete-Greece. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2022, 331, 4685–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. E.U. Council Directive 2013/51/Euratom of 22 October 2013—Requirements for the Protection of the Health of the General Public with Regard to Radioactive Substances in Water Intended for Human Consumption Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32013L0051 (accessed on 8 July 2023).
  32. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 4th ed.; incorporating the first addendum; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950 (accessed on 8 July 2023).
  33. UNSCEAR 2008. Available online: https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2008_1.html (accessed on 8 July 2023).
  34. Vasileiou, E.; Papazotos, P.; Dimitrakopoulos, D.; Perraki, M. Hydrogeochemical Processes and Natural Background Levels of Chromium in an Ultramafic Environment. The Case Study of Vermio Mountain,Western Macedonia, Greece. Water 2021, 13, 2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jankowski, J.; Acworth, R.I. Impact of debris-flow deposits on hydrogeochemical processes and the development of dryland salinity in the Yass River catchment, New South Wales, Australia. Hydrogeol. J. 1997, 5, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gopinath, S.; Srinivasamoorthy, K.; Prakash, R.; Saravanan, K.; Karunanidhi, D. Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater From Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry Coastal Aquifers, South India: Implication for Chemical Characteristics and Sea Water Intrusion. In GIS and Geostatistical Techniques for Groundwater Science; Venkatramanan, S., Prasanna, M.V., Chung, S.Y., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Antonellini, M.; Mollema, P.; Giambastiani, B.; Bishop, K.; Caruso, L.; Minchio, A.; Pellegrini, L.; Sabia, M.; Ulazzi, E.; Gabbianelli, G. Salt water intrusion in the coastal aquifer of the southern Po Plain, Italy. Hydrogeol. J. 2008, 16, 1541–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kazakis, N.; Oikonomidis, D.; Voudouris, K.S. Groundwater vulnerability and pollution risk assessment with disparate models in karstic, porous, and fissured rock aquifers using remote sensing techniques and GIS in Anthemountas basin, Greece. Environ Earth Sci. 2015, 74, 6199–6209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pulido-Velazquez, D.; Baena-Ruiz, L.; Fernandes, J.; Arnó, G.; Hinsby, K.; Voutchkova, D.D.; Hansen, B.; Retike, I.; Bikše, J.; Collados-Lara, A.J.; et al. Assessment of chloride natural background levels by applying statistical approaches. Analyses of European coastal aquifers in different environments. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2022, 174, 113303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. EC (European Commission), 2006. Directive 2006/118/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the Protection of Groundwater Against Pollution and Deterioration—“The Groundwater Directive”. Official Journal of the European Union, L–Legislation, Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2006, L372/19. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:372:0019:0031:EN:PDF (accessed on 8 July 2023).
  41. Gao, Z.; Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, M.; Feng, J.; Fu, T. Temporal Variations of Spring Water in Karst Areas: A Case Study of Jinan Spring Area, Northern China. Water 2020, 12, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mastrocicco, M.; Colombani, N. The Issue of Groundwater Salinization in Coastal Areas of the Mediterranean Region: A Review. Water 2021, 13, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sánchez-Martos, F.; Pulido-Bosch, A.; Molina-Sánchez, L.; Vallejos-Izquierdo, A. Identification of the origin of salinization in groundwater using minor ions (Lower Andarax, Southeast Spain). Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 297, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mirzavand, M.; Ghasemieh, H.; Sadatinejad, S.J.; Bagheri, R. An overview on source, mechanism and investigation approaches in groundwater salinization studies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 17, 2463–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stevens, F.; Azara, I.; Michopoulou, E. Local community attitudes and perceptions towards thermalism. Int. J. Spa Wellness 2018, 1, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Voudouris, K.; Yapijakis, C.; Georgaki, Μ.Ν.; Angelakis, A.N. Historical issues of hydrotherapy in thermal–mineral springs of the Hellenic world. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 2023, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Blake, S.; Henry, T.; Moore, J.P.; Murray, J.; Campanyà, J.; Muller, M.R.; Jones, A.G.; Rath, V.; Walsh, J. Characterising thermal water circulation in fractured bedrock using a multidisciplinary approach: A case study of St. Gorman’s Well, Ireland. Hydrogeol. J. 2021, 29, 2595–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Benami Amiel, R.; Grodek, T.; Frumkin, A. Characterization of the hydrogeology of the sacred Gihon Spring, Jerusalem: A deteriorating urban karst spring. Hydrogeol. J. 2010, 18, 1465–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk, E. Holy waters in the Podlasie region, Poland, as a witness of hydrological and hydrochemical changes. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 2020, 20, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Morer, C.; Roques, C.F.; Françon, A.; Forestier, R.; Maraver, F. The role of mineral elements and other chemical compounds used in balneology: Data from double-blind randomized clinical trials. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2017, 61, 2159–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cheleschi, S.; Gallo, I.; Tenti, S. A comprehensive analysis to understand the mechanism of action of balneotherapy: Why, how, and where they can be used? Evidence from in vitro studies performed on human and animal samples. Int. J. Biometeorol. 2020, 64, 1247–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Crespo, P.-V.; Campos, F.; Leal, M.; Maraver, F. Effects of Sodium Chloride-Rich Mineral Water on Intestinal Epithelium. Experimental Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Choudhari, J.K.; Eberhardt, M.; Chatterjee, T.; Hohberger, B.; Vera, J. Glaucoma-TrEl: A web-based interactive database to build evidence-based hypotheses on the role of trace elements in glaucoma. BMC Res. Notes 2022, 15, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Asterousia Mountain Range Biosphere Reserve, Greece. Available online: https://en.unesco.org/biosphere/eu-na/asterousia-mountain-range (accessed on 8 February 2024).
Figure 1. Topographical map of the area, with the top view of Asclepieion and the positions of its various parts [4,13]. Within the red box is the location of the sacred spring.
Figure 1. Topographical map of the area, with the top view of Asclepieion and the positions of its various parts [4,13]. Within the red box is the location of the sacred spring.
Geosciences 14 00056 g001
Figure 2. (a) Upper panel: Historical map with the distribution of thermometallic springs in Crete [15] (Supplementary Material S1). (b) Down panel: Part of the 1:50.000 scale geological map, Antiscarion sheet, with the locations of the springs (arrows). Geological map legend: cd = coastal deposits, sands, etc.; sc = lateral debris; Pt.t. and m. = terrestrial and marine terraces; pr = porphyrite; o = ophiolitic rocks; gn = gneiss; mr = marbles; Y = granitic intrusions; T k2, c st, k1 = rocks of the Lentas series, limestones, cobbles, sandstones; fl = flysch of the Lentas series [16] (Supplementary Material S2). Red box: Greece; Yellow box: Crete; Blue box: Lentas area.
Figure 2. (a) Upper panel: Historical map with the distribution of thermometallic springs in Crete [15] (Supplementary Material S1). (b) Down panel: Part of the 1:50.000 scale geological map, Antiscarion sheet, with the locations of the springs (arrows). Geological map legend: cd = coastal deposits, sands, etc.; sc = lateral debris; Pt.t. and m. = terrestrial and marine terraces; pr = porphyrite; o = ophiolitic rocks; gn = gneiss; mr = marbles; Y = granitic intrusions; T k2, c st, k1 = rocks of the Lentas series, limestones, cobbles, sandstones; fl = flysch of the Lentas series [16] (Supplementary Material S2). Red box: Greece; Yellow box: Crete; Blue box: Lentas area.
Geosciences 14 00056 g002
Figure 3. Panoramic photo of the lowland arid area of Lenta on the southern slopes of the Asterousia Mountains (view southwest).
Figure 3. Panoramic photo of the lowland arid area of Lenta on the southern slopes of the Asterousia Mountains (view southwest).
Geosciences 14 00056 g003
Figure 4. Combination of geological and topographic maps of the area. The geological section was drawn on the existing geological map (scale: 1:50.000, Antiscarion sheet) along line A1. The hydrological catchment of the narrow area is marked with a red line. A: alpine formations, B: post-alpine formations and including C, referred to as conglomerate in the geological map. A digital elevation model (DEM) was applied to define the topography of the study area; particularly, the SRTM Worldwide Elevation Data (1-arc-second resolution) was used. Furthermore, the implementation of the QGIS software package, version 3.18 (accessed on 20 July 2023; https://qgis.org/en/site/) resulted in the contours generation (20 m contour interval), while the hydrographic network was additionally extracted. Based on both of them (contours and hydrographic network), the watershed of the study area was defined. Finally, the geological map was georeferenced, considering the DEM mentioned above, leading to the combination of the topographic and geological data.
Figure 4. Combination of geological and topographic maps of the area. The geological section was drawn on the existing geological map (scale: 1:50.000, Antiscarion sheet) along line A1. The hydrological catchment of the narrow area is marked with a red line. A: alpine formations, B: post-alpine formations and including C, referred to as conglomerate in the geological map. A digital elevation model (DEM) was applied to define the topography of the study area; particularly, the SRTM Worldwide Elevation Data (1-arc-second resolution) was used. Furthermore, the implementation of the QGIS software package, version 3.18 (accessed on 20 July 2023; https://qgis.org/en/site/) resulted in the contours generation (20 m contour interval), while the hydrographic network was additionally extracted. Based on both of them (contours and hydrographic network), the watershed of the study area was defined. Finally, the geological map was georeferenced, considering the DEM mentioned above, leading to the combination of the topographic and geological data.
Geosciences 14 00056 g004
Figure 5. (a) The flyschoid rocks (pelites, sandstones) intercalated with Upper Jurassic shallow marine limestone lenses 350 m west of the borehole position [16,18]. (b) Focus of the flyschoid rocks. Photographs have been taken at the same level along the road, approximately 350 m left, north of the entrance to Asklepiion.
Figure 5. (a) The flyschoid rocks (pelites, sandstones) intercalated with Upper Jurassic shallow marine limestone lenses 350 m west of the borehole position [16,18]. (b) Focus of the flyschoid rocks. Photographs have been taken at the same level along the road, approximately 350 m left, north of the entrance to Asklepiion.
Geosciences 14 00056 g005
Figure 6. (a) Unconsolidated breccia of dark grey reworked limestones in dm- to m-beds. This lithology presents lateral variations, in particular with the amount of detrital quartz and volcanic clasts [16,18]. (b) Focus of the unconsolidated breccia. Photographs have been taken at the same level along the road, approximately 350 m right, north of the entrance to Asklepiion.
Figure 6. (a) Unconsolidated breccia of dark grey reworked limestones in dm- to m-beds. This lithology presents lateral variations, in particular with the amount of detrital quartz and volcanic clasts [16,18]. (b) Focus of the unconsolidated breccia. Photographs have been taken at the same level along the road, approximately 350 m right, north of the entrance to Asklepiion.
Geosciences 14 00056 g006
Figure 7. (a,b) Consolidated polymict and stratified conglomerate. The matrix of the latter is red-greenish and probably has a volcanic origin; the size of the clasts (mainly composed of limestone blocks and pebbles) is heterogeneous. Photographs have been taken in two different places, approximately one kilometre east of the entrance of Asklepiion.
Figure 7. (a,b) Consolidated polymict and stratified conglomerate. The matrix of the latter is red-greenish and probably has a volcanic origin; the size of the clasts (mainly composed of limestone blocks and pebbles) is heterogeneous. Photographs have been taken in two different places, approximately one kilometre east of the entrance of Asklepiion.
Geosciences 14 00056 g007
Figure 8. (a) Detailed archaeological site mapping during the first excavations (in [13]); (b) the facade of the spring in 1900 (in [4]); (c) the spring fountain in 2019; (d) a sketch of spring’s facade in 1906 and its plan (in [4]).
Figure 8. (a) Detailed archaeological site mapping during the first excavations (in [13]); (b) the facade of the spring in 1900 (in [4]); (c) the spring fountain in 2019; (d) a sketch of spring’s facade in 1906 and its plan (in [4]).
Geosciences 14 00056 g008
Figure 9. (a) Upper panel: Panoramic view of Asclepieion of Lentas (view to the south). The location of the borehole (blue arrow), 70 m north of the sacred spring (filled blue arrow). (b) Lower panel: The location of Kefalovrysa spring (lower left). Within the ravine of Minas, located east of Lentas and at an altitude of 312 m, the spring Kefalovrysa discharges part of the aquifer within the breached gneissic rocks (lower right).
Figure 9. (a) Upper panel: Panoramic view of Asclepieion of Lentas (view to the south). The location of the borehole (blue arrow), 70 m north of the sacred spring (filled blue arrow). (b) Lower panel: The location of Kefalovrysa spring (lower left). Within the ravine of Minas, located east of Lentas and at an altitude of 312 m, the spring Kefalovrysa discharges part of the aquifer within the breached gneissic rocks (lower right).
Geosciences 14 00056 g009
Figure 10. A lithostratigraphic column interpretation of the location where the borehole was drilled. Blue lines indicate the thickness of the aquifer. A copy of the drilling protocol is given in the Supplementary Material S3.
Figure 10. A lithostratigraphic column interpretation of the location where the borehole was drilled. Blue lines indicate the thickness of the aquifer. A copy of the drilling protocol is given in the Supplementary Material S3.
Geosciences 14 00056 g010
Figure 11. Ratio plots for (a) sodium vs. chloride, (b) sulfate vs. chloride, and (c) sulfate vs. sodium from borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Figure 11. Ratio plots for (a) sodium vs. chloride, (b) sulfate vs. chloride, and (c) sulfate vs. sodium from borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Geosciences 14 00056 g011
Figure 12. Ion balance diagram of Lentas borehole water samples.
Figure 12. Ion balance diagram of Lentas borehole water samples.
Geosciences 14 00056 g012
Figure 13. Ion balance diagram of Lentas spring water samples during historical years (1915, 1949, 1955, 1957).
Figure 13. Ion balance diagram of Lentas spring water samples during historical years (1915, 1949, 1955, 1957).
Geosciences 14 00056 g013
Figure 14. Piper diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Figure 14. Piper diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Geosciences 14 00056 g014
Figure 15. Scholler diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Figure 15. Scholler diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Geosciences 14 00056 g015
Figure 16. Durov diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Figure 16. Durov diagram of borehole and spring waters in the Lentas area.
Geosciences 14 00056 g016
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics * of the borehole and spring waters in Lentas.
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics * of the borehole and spring waters in Lentas.
Sample
Number
Sampling
ID
Date
dd/mm/yyyy
Period
Wet/Dry
Water
Type
Temperature
°C
pH
In Situ
pH
Labour
Eh
mV
TOC
mg/L
EC
μS/cm
TDS
mg/L
1Lentas Bh-124 March 2018WetNa-Cl226.97.56191.70.181190580
2Lentas Bh-224 September 2018DryNa-Cl24.67.37.55146.50.731160570
3Lentas Bh-331 March 2019WetNa-Cl19.77.77.12452.091000480
4Lentas Bh-431 August 2019DryNa-Cl267.57.561342.84900440
5Lentas Bh-511 July 2020DryNa-Cl24.67.37.71633.071060520
6Lentas Bh-623 May 2021WetNa-Cl247.27.012303.33
7Kefalovrysa Spring-131 March 2019WetMg-HCO323.18.47.662321.46550270
8Kefalovrysa Spring-231 August 2019DryMg-HCO321.48.38.261178.63560270
9Kefalovrysa Spring-311 July 2020DryMg-HCO321.77.68.11412.53660330
10Lentas Spring 191520 May 1915WetNa-HCO3-Cl
11Lentas Spring 19492 October 1949DryNa-Cl23.57.8 537
12Lentas Spring 195526 February 1955WetNa-Cl22.5 594
13Lentas Spring 195722 June 1957DryNa-Cl227.35 530
* Physicochemical characteristics of the spring/borehole waters obtained: (a) from in situ measurements, (b) from laboratory analyses and (c) from the citation of historically recorded data. Abbreviation: Bh, Borehole. “blank” represent no data.
Table 2. The borehole (Lentas) and spring water samples’ (Kefalovrysa and Lentas) chemical composition in mg/L.
Table 2. The borehole (Lentas) and spring water samples’ (Kefalovrysa and Lentas) chemical composition in mg/L.
No.12345678910111213
Ca2+42.237.628.3110.77.456.85.412.52.662.158.864.059.1
Mg2+32.218.929.947.139.332.787.083.684.330.725.330.226.7
Na+92.495.098.3179.1139.599.646.056.566.489.685.383.682.8
K+5.63.64.56.84.42.92.92.76.58.65.3 4.5
HCO3156.8195.6104.0167.0162.1148.2197.5208.8234.0260.5207.9219.6204.4
Cl165.0175.0161.2133.9138.6181.178.556.265.0143.0129.8148.9133.0
SO42−145.7124.6142.6112.4131.2138.242.524.720.969.874.486.879.4
NO310.314.27.67.811.29.62.93.24.20.415.0 5.8
Fe *0.0 0.0 0.10.10.0 0.1
Mn *0.0 20.4 18.0
SiO223.341.521.88.341.525.54.55.727.4
F0.40.30.40.40.30.20.10.20.1
NH4+0.10.10.10.10.1 0.00.00.00.30.0 0.0
Al3+ 0.4 0.3 1.70.4
B3+0.10.10.10.20.20.20.00.10.1
NO2 0.00.0 0.0
Li+ 0.0 0.00.0 0.0
Ba2+0.10.0 0.10.00.0 0.00.0
Sr2+0.30.20.40.30.50.30.10.10.135.332.532.731.9
Abbreviation: No represents the sample number in Table 1, “blank” represents no data. “*” represent more valences.
Table 3. The concentrations of trace elements in the borehole and spring waters in Lentas.
Table 3. The concentrations of trace elements in the borehole and spring waters in Lentas.
Sample NumberSampling IDMoNiPbSbSeUVZnCuCr
No. μg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/Lμg/L
1Lentas Bh-1 8.51.54.1 7.7199.762.51.9
2Lentas Bh-20.71.20.1 0.70.64.43.20.71.4
3Lentas Bh-32.9 116.9
4Lentas Bh-47.3 0.5 83.38.9 191.0
5Lentas Bh-510.63.11.00.2 0.53.110.115.223.9
6Lentas Bh-619.1 21.1 59.225.312.7
7Kefalovrysa Spring-12.6 7.8
8Kefalovrysa Spring-22.0 0.1 35.82.7 11.6
9Kefalovrysa Spring-310.54.21.10.6 0.42.611.011.927.8
10Lentas Spring 1915
11Lentas Spring 1949
12Lentas Spring 1955
13Lentas Spring 1957
Abbreviation: Bh, Borehole. “blank” represent no data.
Table 4. Measured values of radon concentration of the water samples.
Table 4. Measured values of radon concentration of the water samples.
Sample Number
No.
Sample ID
Name
Date
dd/mm/yyyy
Radon
Concentration
in Water Bq/m3
1Lentas Bh-125 March 20182005 ± 10%
3Lentas Bh-31 April 20191018 ± 9%
5Lentas Bh-512 July 2020443 ± 16%
7Kefalovrysa Spring-11 April 2019684 ± 12%
9Kefalovrysa Spring-312 July 2020335 ± 6%
Thoron was not measured because the radon measurement was conducted on the day following the sampling.
Table 5. Activity concentrations (mBq/L) of uranium isotopes, 210Po and 210Pb in groundwaters from the Lentas Borehole (Lentas-Bh1) of Crete. The uncertainties are given at a 95% confidence level [20].
Table 5. Activity concentrations (mBq/L) of uranium isotopes, 210Po and 210Pb in groundwaters from the Lentas Borehole (Lentas-Bh1) of Crete. The uncertainties are given at a 95% confidence level [20].
Sample234U238U234U/238U210Po210Pb210Po/210Pb
S248.4 ± 1.07.0 ± 0.91.2 ± 0.20.81 ± 0.352.62 ± 0.640.31 ± 0.15
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manoutsoglou, E.; Bei, E.S. Incipient Salinization: A Case Study of the Spring of Asclepieion in Lentas (Ancient Lebena), Crete. Geosciences 2024, 14, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030056

AMA Style

Manoutsoglou E, Bei ES. Incipient Salinization: A Case Study of the Spring of Asclepieion in Lentas (Ancient Lebena), Crete. Geosciences. 2024; 14(3):56. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manoutsoglou, Emmanouil, and Ekaterini S. Bei. 2024. "Incipient Salinization: A Case Study of the Spring of Asclepieion in Lentas (Ancient Lebena), Crete" Geosciences 14, no. 3: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030056

APA Style

Manoutsoglou, E., & Bei, E. S. (2024). Incipient Salinization: A Case Study of the Spring of Asclepieion in Lentas (Ancient Lebena), Crete. Geosciences, 14(3), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14030056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop