Next Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Cattle in Three Districts in Central Ethiopia
Previous Article in Journal
Physical Characterization of Ten Hemp Varieties to Use as Animal Bedding Material
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/ani13020283
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preliminary Assessment of Tumor-Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) in Canine Mast Cell Tumors: Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance and Its Association with Neoangiogenesis

by
Valentina Galietta
1,†,
Francesca Parisi
2,*,†,
Cristiano Cocumelli
1,
Alessio Pierini
2,
Alessandro Poli
2,
Paola Scaramozzino
1,
Valentina Spallucci
1,3 and
Francesca Millanta
2
1
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Lazio e Della Toscana “M. Aleandri”, Via Appia Nuova 1411, 00178 Roma, Italy
2
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge n. 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali, Via Piemonte 60, 00187 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(2), 283; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020283
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 5 January 2023 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 13 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Companion Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Mast cell tumor (MCT) is the most common malignant skin tumor in dogs. In order to gain more information on the prognostic markers of MCT, the role of the eosinophil granulocytes infiltrates was investigated and assessed by the evaluation of tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) in 87 canine cutaneous MCTs. In human medicine, high TATE are often described in highly angiogenic tumors: we therefore assessed the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in neoplastic mast cells. TATE and VEGF expression were compared between themselves, with other variables expressing the biological behavior of the tumor, and with the recurrence. High grades of TATE resulted to be associated with less differentiated tumors, with higher recurrence rates, and with aberrant expression of KIT. This is the first evaluation of the association between TATE and the biologic behavior of MCTs. This study suggests that TATE investigation could be an important source of information for this tumor and for other neoplasms.

Abstract

Mast cell tumor (MCT) is the most common malignant skin tumor in dogs. In order to gain more information on the prognostic markers in MCT, the role of the eosinophil granulocytes infiltrates was investigated and assessed by the evaluation of tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) in 87 canine cutaneous MCTs. In human medicine, high TATE are often described in highly angiogenic tumors: we therefore assessed the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in neoplastic mast cells. TATE and VEGF expression were compared between themselves, with histological grading, immunohistochemical expression of KIT and Ki-67, and with the recurrence. We found a statistically significant correlation between TATE and Patnaik grading (p = 0.041), Kiupel grading (p = 0.022), immunohistochemical KIT expression (p = 0.015), and tumor recurrence (p = 0.000). No associations were observed with Ki-67 and VEGF expression. This is the first evaluation of TATE and its prognostic value in canine MCTs in veterinary oncology. This study suggest that this investigation could be an important source of information for this tumor and for other neoplasms.

1. Introduction

Mast cell tumor (MCT) is considered the most frequent malignant skin tumor in dogs [1], with an incidence of approximately 20% [2]. Cutaneous MCTs appear as non-capsulated masses, solitary or multiple, with dermal localization and/or infiltration of the subcutaneous tissue [3]. Although histological grading has long been considered the main prognostic criterion, recent studies revealed that it is not sufficient to predict the biological behavior of MCTs, but also the support of other prognostic factors is required, such as the expression of KIT and Ki-67 [2]. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment (TME) has assumed an increasing role in oncology, thus suggesting that its investigation could be an important source of information. Particularly, among the morphological features of different kind of tumors, the eosinophils infiltration has drawn increasing interest. Nowadays, it is clear that eosinophilic infiltration in tumors is an essential component of the TME that influences prognosis and therapeutic response. To describe and emphasize the biological and possibly clinical importance played by eosinophils in different types of cancers, Lowe et al. (1981) [4] proposed the term tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE). Eosinophils are attracted to the tumor site by cytokines and chemokines, produced and released by different cell types, such as necrotic tumor cells, Th2 lymphocytes, and mast cells [5,6,7]. Once activated, eosinophils are able to synthesize and release a wide variety of biologically active mediators that can have positive or negative effects on various target cells. Reports in the literature about TATE are often contradictory. Some authors proposed an anticancer activity [8,9,10,11] and improvement of survival in patients with TATE [11,12,13]. In contrast, some studies suggested that the detection of eosinophils within a tumor is a negative histological prognostic marker, associated with a more aggressive behavior [14,15,16,17,18]. In particular, they suggest that eosinophils recruited in the tumor site are able to promote angiogenesis and thus tumor growth. Indeed, these cells may directly release proangiogenic molecules, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and also induce the production of this factor by mast cells [19]. VEGF is a heparin-binding protein with an important proangiogenic activity, involved in controlling vascular permeability, and with a mitogenic and an antiapoptotic effect on endothelial cells. VEGF is not only involved in physiological but also in pathological angiogenesis, acting as a regulator or potential autocrine growth factor for neoplastic cells, such as mast cells [20,21,22,23,24].
Taking these data into consideration, our work aims to investigate and quantify TATE, its association with markers of malignancy, angiogenesis, and prognosis in MCTs and with its involvement with the risk of recurrence.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Tissue Samples

A total of 87 archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cases of canine cutaneous MCTs were retrieved from the Tumor Registry of the Department of Veterinary Sciences of the University of Pisa. All samples came from solitary nonulcerated MCTs fully excised with clear margins [25], belonged to dogs without any other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy), and were submitted for histopathology evaluations from 2009 to 2015. For each case, breed, age, sex, and anatomic location of the tumors were recorded, follow-up data on subsequent local and distant tumor recurrence were collected from referring veterinarians.

2.2. Histopathology

A 4 μm thick section was cut from each FFPE block and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) for routine histopathology examination. For each MCT, histological grading was assessed according to both the Patnaik et al. (1984) [26] and Kiupel et al. [27] classifications. Histological safety margins were assessed following the latest guidelines proposed by Haine et al. [25], which defined incomplete histological margins as the presence of neoplastic cells within ≤1 mm from the margins. Additionally, TATE was obtained by counting the mean number of eosinophils in 10 consecutive high-power fields (HPF, 2.37 mm2), in the hotspot, avoiding necrotic and hemorrhagic areas. The samples were then scored according to the classification provided by Goldsmith et al. (1992) [28]:
  • Score 0: none to 2 eosinophils;
  • Score 1+: presence of 2–10 eosinophils;
  • Score 2+: eosinophils ranging from 10 to 20 eosinophils;
  • Score 3+: from 20 to 30 eosinophils;
  • Score 4+: more than 30 eosinophils.

2.3. Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) investigation was carried out on additional 4 μm thick sections to evaluate the expression of Ki-67, KIT, and VEGF in mast cells, using the streptavidin-biotin peroxidase method.
Briefly, after deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration in graded alcohol according to routine procedures, the endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubating samples with the Bloxall Blocking solution (SP-600, Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 10 min. After microwave cycling to unmask the antigens (three exposures, 5 min each, 750 W in citrate buffer pH 6), nonspecific bindings were blocked by incubation with Ultra V Block (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA) for 5 min. Sections were then incubated over night with a monoclonal mouse antihuman Ki-67 antigen (dilution 1:100, clone MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), a rabbit polyclonal antihuman CD117/KIT (dilution 1:300, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and a polyclonal rabbit anti-VEGF (dilution 1:200, A-20, Sanra Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Incubation with the primary antibodies was followed the next day by incubation with the Biotinylated antibody universal, Anti-mouse / rabbit IgG, made in Horse (Vector Labs, Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) for 20 min and incubation with streptavidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (Horseradish Peroxidase Streptavidin, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA) for twenty min. Colorimetric reaction was revealed with chromogen diaminobenzidine (Impact DAB, Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA, USA). Finally, slides were counterstained with hematoxylin and observed under a light microscope. A canine lymph node and the epidermis as internal control for Ki-67 were used, while for c-KIT and VEGF, a MCT and a canine mammary tumor known to express the marker were employed, respectively. Negative controls were performed by replacing the primary antibody with species-matched unrelated mouse IgG1 isotype control monoclonal antibody (clone MA5-14453, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Fremont, CA, USA) and a rabbit polyclonal anti-toxoplasma antibody (Figure S1).
Samples incubated with Ki-67 were considered positive when the nuclei of mitotic cells showed immunohistochemical staining. Ki-67 index was assessed in all samples using a 1 cm2 grid reticle (10 × 10 mm) at 400× g. The number of positive cells per grid area was assessed upon highly proliferative areas in 5 HPF and subsequently averaged, as previously reported [29].
Evaluation of KIT expression was carried out in all samples according to Kiupel et al. (2004) [30]. Mast cell tumors were classified in three classes on the base of the staining pattern expressed in neoplastic cell: KIT pattern 1, showing membrane-associated staining; KIT pattern 2, showing focal cytoplasmic (i.e., paranuclear) staining; KIT pattern 3, diffuse cytoplasmic staining. Taking into account 100 neoplastic cells in an HPF, MCTs were classified according to the highest staining pattern in at least 10% cells [29].
VEGF expression was assessed in 72 MCTs using a procedure previously described by Lewis et al. (2000) [31]. After scanning the whole tumor section at 40×, five representative nonadjacent and nonoverlapping fields (most of them VEGF-positive) from each tumor were selected. At 400× g, the percentage of positive cells per field (at least 100 of the cells evaluated) was considered, and VEGF expression was determined as the median of the percentages from the five counts. The counts were performed by a single pathologist.

2.4. Study Design

Since MCTs with score 4+ of TATE (as previously described by Goldsmith et al., 1992) [28] were poorly represented in terms of numerosity, they were combined with 3+ scores MCTs, creating three categories of TATE (modified TATE classification), as follows:
  • Score 1+: ≤10 eosinophils;
  • Score 2+: >10 and ≤20 eosinophils;
  • Score 3+: >20 eosinophils;
Moreover, we categorized the results of the expression of Ki67 and VEGF, since the distribution of values was not normal.
For all samples the degree of modified TATE and VEGF expression were compared between themselves and with the Patnaik and Kiupel grades, with expression of Ki-67 and KIT, and with the tumor recurrence. Finally, we evaluated the association between histological grading and tumor recurrence.
The associations were evaluated through the chi-squared Pearson test statistics (p-value < 0.05). We finally calculated the increasing risk (OR) of recurrence for increasing levels of TATE. The analyses were performed using software Stata 12.0 (StataCorp. College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

The mean age of the dogs of our study at the diagnosis was 7.9 ± 2.8, ranging from 2 to 13 years of age. The Boxer was the most represented breed (Table 1a). Regarding gender, dogs were 50 male and 37 females. Thirty-four MCTs arose on trunk, 31 on limbs, 9 on the head, 8 in inguinal-genital region, 3 in the neck, 2 in the tail region (Table 1b).
Data on postsurgical follow-up were available for 63 dogs. Of these animals, 19.5% had tumor recurrence, while the remaining 80.95% did not show any sign of local or distant recurrences.
According to Patnaik grading [26], 12/87 (13.8%) MCTs were classified as grade 1, 62/87 (71.26%) as grade 2, and 13/87 (14.9%) as grade 3. According to the Kiupel grading [27], 67/87 (77%) cases were classified as low-grade MCTs and 20/87 (23%) as high-grade MCTs.
The results of Ki-67 antigen expression highlighted that 15 mast cell tumors (17.2%) had a Ki-67 index equal to 0 positive nuclei, 22 (25.3%) and 20 (23%) had Ki-67 index of 1 and 2 positive nuclei, respectively, while the remaining had a Ki-67 index ≥3 of positive nuclei, ranging from 3 to 15 (Figure 1A,B, Table 2). Given the low number of positive nuclei in each tumor, for further evaluations, Ki-67 counts were divided into four groups as follows: group 1 = less than 1 stained nucleus; group 2: 1 stained nucleus; group 3: 2 stained nuclei; group 4: ≥3 stained nuclei. They were also divided into three groups as follows: group 1 = no stain; group 2 = 1 or 2 stained nuclei; group 3 = ≥3 stained nuclei. KIT expression showed an intense, membranous staining (KIT pattern 1, Figure 1C) in 17 cases (19.5%), a focal cytoplasmic or paranuclear expression (KIT pattern 2, Figure 1D) in 55 cases (63.2%), and a diffuse cytoplasmic expression (KIT pattern 3, Figure 1E) in the remaining 15 cases (17.3%) (Table 2). Considering the results, we categorized Ki67 both in three and four categories, as reported in Table 2.
VEGF expression was observed in all 72 MCTs tested, with a strong, diffuse to granular, intracytoplasmic pattern of positivity (Figure 1F). The mean percentage of positive cells ranged from 2% to 60%, with a percentage mean of 12.3. Slightly more than half of MCTs had a VEGF expression rate of ≤5% (34/72, 54%) (Table 2). For statical analysis, we categorized the expression of VEGF both in tertiles and using the 5% of IHC expression as cut-off, thus obtaining numerously similar sample groups (Table 2).
From the analysis of modified TATE classification, we observed a significant association with Patnaik grading (p = 0.041), Kiupel grading (p = 0.022), KIT expression (p = 0.015), and tumor recurrence (p = 0.000) (Table 3). In contrast, there was no statistically significant association between TATE and expression of Ki-67 and VEGF (p > 0.05). Analyzing the VEGF results, we observed a statistically significant association between KIT and VEGF (p = 0.033), divided into three categories, and a significant association between Kiupel grading and VEGF in two categories (p = 0.019) (Table 3). Finally, considering tumor recurrence, we found a significant association with Patnaik grading (p = 0.022) (Table 3).
The estimated risk of recurrence (OR) for the third grade of TATE with respect to the first grade was 3.2 (CI95% = 0.61–16.67).
According to the modified-TATE classification score, 22/87 (25.3%) MCTs were classified as score 1+ (Figure 2A), 42/87 (48.3%) as score 2+, 23/87 (26.4%) as score 3+ (Figure 2B) (Table 2).

4. Discussion

MCTs may have highly variable biological behavior. Histological grading has long been considered the main prognostic criterion, but it is now evident that other factors are needed to predict the biological behavior of MCTs. None of the acknowledged markers have a completely reliable prognostic value. Therefore, the greatest predictive benefit comes from the combined use of different markers [32]. For this reason, many research works, including the present study, are focused on the investigation of new prognostic factors that can predict more accurately the outcome of MCTs.
The choice to restrict our study to solitary lesions excised with clear margins finds a rationale in the attempt to control the variability of the prognosis. Indeed, some authors [33] suggested that the presence of multiple MCTs may negatively influence the prognosis, while, on the contrary, others [34] suggested that overall survival was not influenced by it. Moreover, incisional biopsies have not been entered in the study because they may not be faithfully representative of the entire lesion, whose comprehensive analysis is required for the Patnaik histological grading [1].
In our study, Boxers and Retrievers and older dogs were confirmed among the most affected subjects, with a medium age comparable to that reported in previous studies, and no clear gender predisposition was highlighted [1,35]. The trunk was confirmed as the most affected region, followed by the limbs, the head, and the neck, as already observed [36]. On the contrary, we did not find a large number of inguinal-genital MCTs that were previously reported as frequently as trunk MCTs [37,38]. The reason for this discrepancy can be found in the type of samples: our study focuses only on cutaneous tumors, while most of the other works in the literature combine cutaneous and subcutaneous mast cell tumors.
The assessment of histological grading in MCTs remains the key point for predicting prognosis. The Patnaik classification was reported to be more sensitive, whereas the Kiupel one seems to be more specific in detecting aggressive diseases [39]. In line with the latest recommendations of the second Consensus Meeting on the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Canine Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Mast Cell Tumors organized by the Brazilian Association of Veterinary Oncology (ABROVET) [1] and of the American College of Veterinary Pathologists and the Veterinary Cancer Society [40], our study applied both of the classification schemes [26,27]. Comparing the two grading systems, we observed that all Patnaik grade 1 cases, most Patnaik grade 2 cases (85.5%), and two grade 3 cases (15.4%) were included in Kiupel low grades. Kiupel high-grade MCTs, on the other hand, included the remaining Patnaik grade 2 and most Patnaik grade 3 (84.6%). This indicates a correspondence between the two classification systems, especially between Patnaik grades 1 and 3 and Kiupel low and high grade, respectively. Patnaik grade 2 cases were instead distributed among the Kiupel grades, as already observed by previous authors using both classification schemes [39,41,42,43].
Latest studies demonstrated that immunohistochemical markers are required to better characterize the biological behavior of all MCTs. We decided to evaluate expression of Ki-67 and KIT, as already consolidated and more reliable prognostic factors [44]. The results of the Ki-67 index pointed out that most cases with a low number of positive nuclei were classified as Kiupel low grade, while most of those with a high number of positive nuclei at Ki67 were Kiupel high grade, confirming the value of this parameter as a prognostic factor [44]. We found an association between KIT expression pattern and tumor recurrence rates. This result is in line with previous studies. KIT cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was correlated with a reduced survival [30,45], a higher histological grade, and an increase in cell proliferation [46]. Particularly, Kiupel et al. [30] associated KIT patterns 2 and 3 with a higher local recurrence rate and a higher mortality rate in their study.
All the MCTs tested positive for VEGF protein, and although not statistically significant, tumors with more conspicuous malignant features showed a trend towards a higher expression. In mouse and human mast cells, the release of VEGF is already described [47], and in other studies, its role in the regulation of angiogenesis confirmed that mast-cell-derived VEGF is involved as well [48,49,50].
In humans, it has been proved that the VEGF released by mast cells, after being activated by several molecules and mechanisms, is strictly involved in tumor development [51,52]. Rebuzzi et al. [53] succeeded in demonstrating that primary neoplastic mast cells in dogs and a canine MCTs cell line express VEGF protein at the mRNA and protein level. Although the angiogenic power of mast cells is known, there are conflicting results in the literature on its prognostic value. One study indicated that VEGF expression was predictive of poor prognosis [1]. On the contrary, other authors highlighted that VEGF had no value as a biomarker for malignancy and was not useful to predict clinical outcome [53,54]. Actually, Amorim et al. [54] suggested that MCTs probably expressed VEGF because their neoplastic cells retained the capability to release this proangiogenic factor typical of their physiologic status, although both in their study and in that of Rebuzzi et al. [53], VEGF appeared not to act as an autocrine growth regulator. Given these previous considerations and the results of our study, it is likely that angiogenetic function could be accomplished also by other mediator factors in MCTs, and that further studies are needed to provide additional data also on the paracrine regulation of VEGF production.
Nowadays, the analysis of TME is at the forefront of oncology since tumor infiltrating cells or immune cells were reported to influence the development and the progression of several tumoral diseases. Hence, for this reason, we focused our attention on eosinophils. Eosinophils are immunomodulatory, cytotoxic cells representing 1–3% of leukocytes that have been reported in various organs associated with the pathogenesis and prognosis of various pathologies, such as allergic phenomena, asthma, vasculitis, gastrointestinal disorders, and parasitosis [55]. The term TATE was suggested at first by Lowe et al. in 1981 [4] to indicate the presence of eosinophils in tumor stroma recruited under the influence of chemicals or other immune cells, in the absence of any ulceration or necrosis [56,57]. TATE has been documented in several neoplasms in human medicine, such as oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) [58], solid tumors, bladder cancer [18], larynx SCC [59], esophageal SCC [60], colorectal cancer [61], cervical carcinoma [62], gastric adenocarcinoma [63], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [64], Hodgkin lymphoma [65], and penile cancer [13]. The presence of eosinophils in MCT is due to mast-cell-released eosinophil chemoattractant factors (such as histamine, stem cell factor, and interleukin 5) [66]; however, there are no studies testing the potential prognostic power of the degree of eosinophils infiltrates in MCTs.
To date, and to the authors knowledge, there are no reports about TATE with tumors in veterinary medicine.
Due to this lack of information, we first quantified eosinophils in canine MCTs using the score proposed by Goldschmidt et al., 1992 [28], but then we modified it in a three-point one, since the latest group was not represented in the population of MCTs analyzed. Whether this eventuality is linked to the species difference or to the different neoplasms analyzed, it should be clarified. In our study, a high number of intratumor eosinophils (modified TATE score 3+) was significantly associated with less differentiated tumors following both the Patnaik and Kiupel histological classification, with aberrant KIT expression (KIT pattern 2 and 3). The estimated risk of recurrence (OR) for the third grade of TATE with respect to the first grade was >1, but it was not significant at 95% CL, probably due to the small number of observations. Nevertheless, this evidence suggested that a high score of tissue eosinophilia should be considered as a negative prognostic marker for canine MCTs. This finding also highlights that not only do mast cells modulate eosinophils activation, but that the reverse influence is also possible, with mast cells and eosinophils having a bidirectional interaction in TME [19,67]. Moreover, it seems that specific chemotactic molecules of cancer, known as eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis, (ECF-Ca), different from the chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis (ECF-A) exist [68].
Previous studies in humans suggested that tissue eosinophilia in different tumors may be associated either with good or poor patient prognosis [57]. Some authors highlighted that tissue eosinophils hesitated into an antitumor role and, therefore, resulted in better prognosis, due to the secretion of cytotoxic mediators, such as the main basic protein (MBP), the eosinophilic cationic protein (CEP), and the eosinophilic peroxides (EP) acting as tumoricidal agents [16]. On the other hand, other researchers [69] reported that ECP could degrade muscle and cytoskeletal proteins associated with cell membrane, thus contributing to muscle fiber degradation and tumor invasion. Additional studies suggested that tissue eosinophils could promote neoangiogenesis and tumor development through the releasing of proangiogenic factors, such as VEGF, remodeling factors, such as fibroblast growth factor (b-FGF), GM-CSF, TGF-b, and MMP-9, but also IL-6, IL-8, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) [6,69,70,71,72]. Particularly, Alrawi et al. [14] observed that an elevated eosinophilic count in SCC of the digestive tract was associated with tumor invasion and, therefore, predictive of an aggressive tumor form. Rakesh et al. [73] found that relapse of oral SCC was significantly associated with a great number of TATE. Choudhary et al. [57] hypothesized that the variable outcome among different studies could be also related to some intrinsic factors, such as different clinical and pathological stages of neoplasms, different histological grades, and the presence or absence of metastases. They have also opened a debate on the methodology by which eosinophilia was assessed by various researchers, claiming a need for standardization of the different counting methodologies, which could seriously affect the results of the research output. Particularly, they suggested to count per high power field rather than per mm2, because the latter requires a morphometric software which is not available in every pathology facility. Finally, TATE investigation requires no additional cost and time for staining or pathological processing, hence further investigation on this topic could also be facilitated by low costs.
Bearing in mind that a better clinical and therapeutic management of MCTs, as well as a more accurate prediction of the outcome, can be achieved through the use of an accurate clinical staging [74,75] and a combination of multiple prognostic markers, we believe that, on the basis of the results and the considerations of this study, TATE should be taken into consideration as a prognostic factor in MCT. On the basis of our results, although preliminary, it would be worthwhile trying to apply this TATE classification scheme to cytological samples, with far more immediate implications in the clinical management of MCTs. Moreover, due to their involvement in TME and their interaction with several immune molecules and cells influencing tumor development and the low cost of the procedures, further studies to elucidate the role of eosinophils in neoplasms of other origins should be also encouraged.

5. Conclusions

Based on our knowledge, this work has evaluated for the first time in veterinary oncology the prognostic role of eosinophilic infiltration assessed by TATE quantification in canine mast cell tumors. Despite conflicting data in the literature, this preliminary study highlights the usefulness of evaluating the prognostic importance of TATE in canine MCT and other neoplasms, to further understand the role of TME in the development of neoplasms and, therefore, the implementation of new therapeutic strategies.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13020283/s1, Figure S1: (A) Canine lymph node, positive control for the anti-Ki67 antibody (mouse anti-human Ki-67, clone MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), inset: an immunolabelled mitosis (yellow arrow). IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 100 µm (B) Canine MCT, negative control for the anti-Ki67 antibody (mouse anti-human Ki-67 antigen, clone MIB-1, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 100 µm (C) Canine MCT, positive control for the anti- CD117/KIT antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-human CD117/KIT Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 50 µm (D) Canine MCT, negative control for the anti-CD117/KIT antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-human CD117/KIT Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 100 µm E) Canine mammary gland tumor, positive control for the anti-VEGF antibody (rabbit polyclonal anti-VEGF, A-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA). IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 50 µm F) Canine MCT, negative control for the anti-VEGF antibody (A-20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA), IHC, EE counterstaining, bar = 100 µm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.; methodology, F.P., C.C. and A.P. (Alessandro Poli); software, F.P. and C.C.; validation, F.M.; formal analysis, V.S.; investigation, V.G. and F.P.; resources, A.P. (Alessandro Poli), F.M.; data curation, V.G., F.P., A.P. (Alessio Pierini),V.S. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, V.G. and F.P, writing—review and editing, V.G., F.P., C.C., A.P. (Alessio Pierini) and F.M; visualization, A.P. (Alessio Pierini); supervision, P.S. and F.M.; project administration, F.M.; funding acquisition, A.P. (Alessandro Poli and F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to all samples used in this retrospective study were archival biopsies and we used non-identifiable data or records.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Nardi, A.B.; Dos Santos Horta, R.; Fonseca-Alves, C.E.; de Paiva, F.N.; Linhares, L.C.M.; Firmo, B.F.; Ruiz Sueiro, F.A.; de Oliveira, K.D.; Lourenço, S.V.; De Francisco Strefezzi, R.; et al. Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment of Canine Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Mast Cell Tumors. Cells 2022, 10, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kiupel, M.; Camus, M. Diagnosis and Prognosis of Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2019, 49, 819–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gross, T.L.; Ihrke, P.; Walder, E.J.; Affolter, V.K. Mast cell tumors. In Skin Diseases of the Dog and Cat Clinical and Histopathologic Diagnosis, 2nd ed.; Blackwell Science: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 853–865. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lowe, D.; Jorizzo, J.; Hutt, M.S. Tumour-associated eosinophilia: A review. J. Clin. Pathol. 1981, 34, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Simson, L.; Ellyard, J.I.; Dent, L.A.; Matthaei, K.I.; Rothenberg, M.E.; Foster, P.S.; Smyth, M.J.; Parish, C.R. Regulation of carcinogenesis by IL-5 and CCL11: A potential role for eosinophils in tumor immune surveillance. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 4222–4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ellyard, J.I.; Simson, L.; Parish, C.R. Th2-mediated anti-tumour immunity: Friend or foe? Tissue Antigens 2007, 70, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Davis, B.P.; Rothenberg, M.E. Eosinophils and cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gleich, G.J.; Frigas, E.; Loegering, D.A.; Wassom, D.L.; Steinmuller, D. Cytotoxic properties of the eosinophil major basic protein. J. Immunol. 1979, 123, 2925–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goswami, P.K. Local subcutaneous eosinophil leukocytic reaction to the inoculation of isolated normal or tumour cells in mice. Br. J. Cancer 1964, 18, 692–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tepper, R.I.; Pttengale, P.K.; Leder, P. Murine interleukin 4 displays potent anti-tumor activity in vivo. Cell 1989, 57, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gatault, S.; Legrand, F.; Delbeke, M.; Loiseau, S.; Capron, M. Involvement of eosinophils in the anti-tumor response. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2012, 61, 1527–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kuper, H.; Adami, H.O.; Trichopoulos, D. Infections as a major preventable cause of human cancer. J. Intern. Med. 2000, 248, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ono, Y.; Ozawa, M.; Tamura, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Suzuki, K.; Kurokawa, K.; Fukabori, Y.; Yamanaka, H. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia of penile cancer. Int. J. Urol. 2002, 9, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alrawi, S.J.; Tan, D.; Stoler, D.L.; Dayton, M.; Anderson, G.R.; Mojica, P.; Douglas, W.; Hicks, W., Jr.; Rigual, N.; Loree, T. Tissue eosinophilic infiltration: A useful marker for assessing stromal invasion, survival and locoregional recurrence in head and neck squamous neoplasia. Cancer J. 2005, 11, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Said, M.; Wiseman, S.; Yang, J.; Alrawi, S.; Douglas, W.; Cheney, R.; Hicks, W.; Rigual, N.; Loree, T.; Spiegel, G.; et al. Tissue eosinophilia: A morphologic marker for assessing stromal invasion in laryngeal squamous neoplasms. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2005, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Oliveira, D.T.; Biassi, T.P.; Faustino, S.E.; Carvalho, A.L.; Landman, G.; Kowalski, L.P. Eosinophils may predict occult lymph node metastasis in early oral cancer. Clin. Oral Investig. 2012, 16, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xie, F.; Liu, L.B.; Shang, W.Q.; Chang, K.K.; Meng, Y.H.; Mei, J.; Yu, J.J.; Li, D.J.; Li, M.Q. The infiltration and functional regulation of eosinophils induced by TSLP promote the proliferation of cervical cancer cell. Cancer Lett. 2015, 364, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Popov, H.; Donev, I.S.; Ghenev, P. Quantitative Analysis of Tumor-associated Tissue Eosinophilia in Recurring Bladder Cancer. Cureus 2018, 10, e3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Elishmereni, M.; Bachelet, I.; Ben-Efraim, A.H.N.; Mankuta, D.; Levi- Schaffer, F. Interacting mast cells and eosinophils acquire an enhanced activation state in vitro. Allergy 2013, 68, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Restucci, B.; Papparella, S.; Maiolino, P.; De Vico, G. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in canine mammary tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2002, 39, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wergin, M.C.; Kaser-Hotz, B. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) measured in seventy dogs with spontaneously occurring tumours. In Vivo 2004, 18, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  22. Wergin, M.C.; Ballmer-Hofer, K.; Roos, M.; Achermann, R.E.; Inteeworn, N.; Akens, M.K.; Blattmann, H.; Kaser-Hotz, B. Preliminary study of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) during low- and high-dose radiation therapy of dogs with spontaneous tumors. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2004, 45, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Restucci, B.; Borzacchiello, G.; Maiolino, P.; Martano, M.; Paciello, O.; Papparella, S. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor Flk-1 in canine mammary tumours. J. Comp. Pathol. 2004, 130, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Millanta, F.; Silvestri, G.; Vaselli, C.; Citi, S.; Pisani, G.; Lorenzi, D.; Poli, A. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor Flk-1/KDR in promoting tumour angiogenesis in feline and canine mammary carcinomas: A preliminary study of autocrine and paracrine loops. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006, 81, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haine, D.L.; Pittaway, R.; Berlato, D.; Demetriou, J. Incomplete histological margins following planned narrow excision of canine appendicular soft tissue sarcomas and mast cell tumors, using the residual tumor classification scheme. Vet. Surg. 2022, 51, 1078–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Patnaik, A.K.; Ehler, W.J.; MacEwen, E.G. Canine cutaneous mast cell tumour: Morphologic grading and survival time in 83 dogs. Vet. Pathol. 1984, 21, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kiupel, M.; Webster, J.D.; Bailey, K.L.; Best, S.; DeLay, J.; Detrisac, C.J.; Fitzgerald, S.D.; Gamble, D.; Ginn, P.E.; Goldschmidt, M.H.; et al. Proposal of a 2-tier histologic grading system for canine cutaneous mast cell tumors to more accurately predict biological behavior. Vet. Pathol. 2011, 48, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Goldsmith, M.M.; Belchis, D.A.; Cresson, D.H.; Merritt, W.D.; Askin, F.B. The importance of the eosinophil in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 1992, 106, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Webster, J.D.; Yuzbasiyan-Gurkan, V.; Miller, R.A.; Kaneene, J.B.; Kiupel, M. Cellular proliferation in canine cutaneous mast cell tumors: Associations with c-KIT and its role in prognostication. Vet Pathol. 2007, 44, 298–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kiupel, M.; Webster, J.D.; Kaneene, J.B.; Miller, R.; Yuzbasiyan- Gurkan, V. The Use of KIT and Tryptase Expression Patterns as Prognostic Tools for Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors. Vet. Pathol. 2004, 41, 371–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lewis, J.S.; Landers, R.J.; Underwood, J.C.; Harris, A.L.; Lewis, C.E. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor by macrophages is up-regulated in poorly vascularized areas of breast carcinomas. J. Pathol. 2000, 192, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thamm, D.H.; Avery, A.C.; Berlato, D.; Bulman-Fleming, J.; Clifford, C.A.; Hershey, A.E.; Intile, J.L.; Jones, P.D.; Kamstock, D.A.; Liptak, J.M.; et al. Prognostic and predictive significance of KIT protein expression and c-kit gene mutation in canine cutaneous mast cell tumours: A consensus of the Oncology-Pathology Working Group. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2019, 17, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kiupel, M.; Webster, J.D.; Miller, R.A.; Kaneene, J.B. Impact of tumour depth, tumour location and multiple synchronous masses on the prognosis of canine cutaneous mast cell tumours. J. Vet. Med. Ser. A 2005, 52, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. O’Connell, K.; Thomson, M. Evaluation of prognostic indicators in dogs with multiple, simultaneously occurring cutaneous mast cell tumours: 63 cases. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2011, 11, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bellamy, E.; Berlato, D. Canine cutaneous and subcutaneous mast cell tumours: A narrative review. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2022, 63, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oliveira, M.T.; Campos, M.; Lamego, L.; Magalhães, D.; Menezes, R.; Oliveira, R.; Patanita, F.; Ferreira, D.A. Canine and Feline Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor: A Comprehensive Review of Treatments and Outcomes. Top. Companion Anim. Med. 2020, 41, 100472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thamm, D.H. Miscellaneous tumors: Hemangiosarcoma. In Withrow and MacEwen’s Small Animal Clinical Oncology, 5th ed.; Withrow, S.J., Vail, D.M., Page, R.L., Eds.; Elsevier Saunders: St. Louis, MI, USA, 2013; pp. 679–688. [Google Scholar]
  38. Meuten, D.J. Tumors in Domestic Animals; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; p. 1008. [Google Scholar]
  39. Stefanello, D.; Buracco, P.; Sabattini, S.; Finotello, R.; Giudice, C.; Grieco, V.; Iussich, S.; Tursi, M.; Scase, T.; Di Palma, S.; et al. Comparison of 2- and 3-category histologic grading systems for predicting the presence of metastasis at the time of initial evaluation in dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumors: 386 cases (2009–2014). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2015, 246, 765–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Berlato, D.; Bulman-Fleming, J.; Clifford, C.A.; Garrett, L.; Intile, J.; Jones, P.; Kamstock, D.A.; Liptak, J.M.; Pavuk, A.; Powell, R.; et al. Value, Limitations, and Recommendations for Grading of Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumors: A Consensus of the Oncology-Pathology Working Group. Vet. Pathol. 2021, 58, 858–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Murphy, S.; Sparkes, A.H.; Smith, K.C.; Blunden, A.S.; Brearley, M.J. Relationships between the histological grade of cutaneous mast cell tumours in dogs, their survival and the efficacy of surgical resection. Vet. Rec. 2004, 154, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sabattini, S.; Scarpa, F.; Berlato, D.; Bettini, G. Histologic grading of canine mast cell tumor: Is 2 better than 3? Vet. Pathol. 2015, 52, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Horta, R.S.; Lavalle, G.E.; Monteiro, L.N.; Souza, M.C.C.; Cassali, G.D.; Araújo, R.B. Assessment of Canine Mast Cell Tumor Mortality Risk Based on Clinical, Histologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Features. Vet. Pathol. 2018, 55, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Freytag, J.O.; Queiroz, M.R.; Govoni, V.M.; Pereira, I.V.A.; Pulz, L.H.; de Francisco Strefezzi, R.; Queiroga, F.L.; Cogliati, B. Prognostic value of immunohistochemical markers in canine cutaneous mast cell tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2021, 19, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Preziosi, R.; Morini, M.; Sarli, G. Expression of the KIT protein (CD117) in primary cutaneous mast cell tumors of the dog. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2004, 16, 554–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gil da Costa, R.M.; Matos, E.; Rema, A.; Lopes, C.; Pires, M.A.; Gärtner, F. CD117 immunoexpression in canine mast cell tumours: Correlations with pathological variables and proliferation markers. BMC Vet. Res. 2007, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gerber, H.P.; Ferrara, N. The role of VEGF in normal and neoplastic hematopoiesis. J. Mol. Med. 2003, 81, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boesiger, J.; Tsai, M.; Maurer, M.; Yamaguchi, M.; Brown, L.F.; Claffey, K.P.; Dvorak, H.F.; Galli, S.J. Mast cells can secrete vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial cell growth factor and exhibit enhanced release after immunoglobulin E-dependent upregulation of fc epsilon receptor I expression. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 1135–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Artuc, M.; Hermes, B.; Steckelings, U.M.; Grutzkau, A.; Henz, B.M. Mast cells and their mediators in cutaneous wound healing—Active participants or innocent bystanders? Exp. Dermatol. 1999, 8, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szukiewicz, D.; Gujski, M.; Maslinska, D.; Szewczyk, G.; Bachanek, M.; Maslinski, S. Mast cell-derived VEGF and VEGF receptor type 1, 2, and 3 expression in human term trophoblast culture—Influence of hypoxia. Inflamm. Res. 2005, 54, S82–S83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shaik-Dasthagirisaheb, Y.B.; Varvara, G.; Murmura, G.; Saggini, A.; Potalivo, G.; Caraffa, A.; Antinolfi, P.; Tete, S.; Tripodi, D.; Conti, F.; et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), mast cells and inflammation. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2013, 26, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sammarco, G.; Varricchi, G.; Ferraro, V.; Ammendola, M.; De Fazio, M.; Altomare, D.F.; Luposella, M.; Maltese, L.; Currò, G.; Marone, G.; et al. Mast Cells, Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis in Human Gastric Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rebuzzi, L.; Willmann, M.; Sonneck, K.; Gleixner, K.V.; Florian, S.; Kondo, R.; Mayerhofer, M.; Vales, A.; Gruze, A.; Pickl, W.F.; et al. Detection of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptors Flt-1 and KDR in canine mastocytoma cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2007, 115, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amorim, R.L.; Pinczowski, P.; Neto, R.T.; Rahal, S.C. Immunohistochemical evaluation of prostaglandin E2 and vascular endothelial growth factor in canine cutaneous mast cell tumours. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2010, 8, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Diny, N.L.; Rose, N.R.; Čiháková, D. Eosinophils in Autoimmune Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2017, 27, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Reichman, H.; Karo-Atar, D.; Munitz, A. Emerging roles for eosinophils in the tumor microenvironment. Trends in Cancer. 2016, 2, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Choudhary, N.; Sarode, G.S.; Yuwanati, M.; Maniyar, N.; Sarode, S.C.; Gadbail, A.R.; Gondivkar, S.; Patil, S. Tumor associated tissue eosinophilia in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2021, 11, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mascitti, M.; Togni, L.; Rubini, C.; Troiano, G.; Lo Muzio, L.; Santarelli, A. Tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A comprehensive review. Histol. Histopathol. 2021, 36, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Etit, D.; Yardım, B.G.; Arslanoğlu, S.; Bayol, U.; Cukurova, I.; Oztürkcan, S.; Korkmaz, N.Ş. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia as a prognostic factor in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2014, 66, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ishibashi, S.; Ohashi, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Moriya, T.; Satomi, S.; Sasano, H. Tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 1419–1424. [Google Scholar]
  61. Saraiva, A.L.; Carneiro, F. New Insights Into the Role of Tissue Eosinophils in the Progression of Colorectal Cancer: A Literature Review. Acta Med. Port. 2018, 31, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Merlin, M.; Hanly, M.G. Cervical carcinoma demonstrating tumor-associated tissue eosinophilia: A clinicopathological study of 17 patients. J. Low. Genit. Tract Dis. 1999, 3, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Caruso, R.; Irato, E.; Rigoli, L. Eosinophil exocytosis in a poorly differentiated tubular gastric adenocarcinoma: Case report. Ultrastruct. Pathol. 2022, 46, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xiang, Y.; Yao, H.; Wang, S.; Hong, M.; He, J.; Cao, S.; Min, H.; Song, E.; Guo, X. Prognostic value of Survivin and Livin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2006, 116, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hollander, P.; Rostgaard, K.; Smedby, K.E.; Molin, D.; Loskog, A.; de Nully Brown, P.; Enblad, G.; Amini, R.M.; Hjalgrim, H.; Glimelius, I. An anergic immune signature in the tumor microenvironment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma is associated with inferior outcome. Eur. J. Haematol. 2018, 100, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Galdiero, M.R.; Varricchi, G.; Seaf, M.; Marone, G.; Levi-Schaffer, F.; Marone, G. Bidirectional Mast Cell-Eosinophil Interactions in Inflammatory Disorders and Cancer. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. van Kempen, L.C.; Ruiter, D.J.; van Muijen, G.N.; Coussens, L.M. The tumor microenvironment: A critical determinant of neoplastic evolution. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 82, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wasserman, S.I.; Goetzl, E.J.; Ellman, L.; Austen, K.F. Tumor-associated eosinophilotactic factor. N. Engl. J. Med. 1974, 21, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sugihara, R.; Kumamoto, T.; Ito, T.; Ueyama, H.; Toyoshima, I.; Tsuda, T. Human muscle protein degradation in vitro by eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). Muscle Nerve 2001, 24, 1627–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Murdoch, C.; Muthana, M.; Coffelt, S.B.; Lewis, C.E. The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2008, 8, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Martinelli-Kläy, C.P.; Mendis, B.R.; Lombardi, T. Eosinophils and oral squamous cell carcinoma: A short review. J. Oncol. 2009, 2009, 310132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Jacobsen, E.A.; Helmers, R.A.; Lee, J.J.; Lee, N.A. The expanding role(s) of eosinophils in health and disease. Blood 2012, 120, 3882–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Rakesh, N.; Devi, Y.; Majumdar, K.; Reddy, S.S.; Agarwal, K. Tumour associated tissue eosinophilia as a predictor of locoregional recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J. Clin. Exp. Dent. 2015, 7, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Worley, D.R. Incorporation of sentinel lymph node mapping in dogs with mast cell tumours: 20 consecutive procedures. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2014, 12, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Manfredi, M.; De Zani, D.; Chiti, L.E.; Ferrari, R.; Stefanello, D.; Giudice, C.; Pettinato, V.; Longo, M.; Di Giancamillo, M.; Zani, D.D. Preoperative planar lymphoscintigraphy allows for sentinel lymph node detection in 51 dogs improving staging accuracy: Feasibility and pitfalls. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound 2021, 62, 602–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 13 00283 g001 550
Figure 1. Ki-67 immunostaining: scattered (A) and several (B), intensely positive nuclei in neoplastic mast cells. Labelled streptavidin biotin (LSAB) method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm. KIT immunostaining using an anti-CD117 antibody: membranous (C), perinuclear (D), and cytoplasmic (E) staining pattern. LSAB method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm. (F) Diffuse cytoplasmic immunoreactivity to the anti-VEGF antibody. LSAB method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 1. Ki-67 immunostaining: scattered (A) and several (B), intensely positive nuclei in neoplastic mast cells. Labelled streptavidin biotin (LSAB) method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm. KIT immunostaining using an anti-CD117 antibody: membranous (C), perinuclear (D), and cytoplasmic (E) staining pattern. LSAB method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm. (F) Diffuse cytoplasmic immunoreactivity to the anti-VEGF antibody. LSAB method IHC, hematoxylin counterstain, scale bar 50 μm.
Animals 13 00283 g001
Animals 13 00283 g002 550
Figure 2. (A) Canine cutaneous mast cell tumor with a TATE score of 1+. H-E, scale bar 50 μm. (B) Canine cutaneous mast cell tumor with a TATE score of 3+. Arrow: binucleation; arrowhead: multinucleation. H-E, scale bar 50 μm.
Figure 2. (A) Canine cutaneous mast cell tumor with a TATE score of 1+. H-E, scale bar 50 μm. (B) Canine cutaneous mast cell tumor with a TATE score of 3+. Arrow: binucleation; arrowhead: multinucleation. H-E, scale bar 50 μm.
Animals 13 00283 g002
Table
Table 1. Details of the breeds with MCTs selected for the study (a), and list of the tumor sites (b).
Table 1. Details of the breeds with MCTs selected for the study (a), and list of the tumor sites (b).
(a)—Breeds
Boxer19
Mixed breed15
Labrador Retriever10
English Setter6
Argentine Dogo5
Pug5
Jack Russell3
Corsican3
Beagle2
German Hound2
Bull Mastiff2
French Bulldogs2
Golden Retrievers2
Scottish Shepherd Dogs2
Springer Spaniel2
Yorkshire terrier2
Single dogs grouped (Border collie, Chihuahua, Pincher, Rottweiler, Italian Hound)5
(b)—Tumor Site
Trunk34
Limbs31
Head9
Inguinal-genital8
Neck3
Tail2
Table
Table 2. Summary of the results for the different variables analyzed and their categories/classification. Modified TATE is expressed in three scores; Ki-67 values are both divided in 4 and in 3 groups; KIT in three patterns of expression; VEGF expression is reported in tertiles and with a cut-off value of 5%.
Table 2. Summary of the results for the different variables analyzed and their categories/classification. Modified TATE is expressed in three scores; Ki-67 values are both divided in 4 and in 3 groups; KIT in three patterns of expression; VEGF expression is reported in tertiles and with a cut-off value of 5%.
VariableCategories/Classificationn° and % of MCTsTotal n° of MCTs
Modified TATE
Score 12225.3%87
Score 24248.3%
Score 32326.4%
Ki-67 expression
4 groups
11517.2%87
22225.3%
32023.0%
43034.5%
3 groups
11517.2%87
24248.3%
33034.5%
KIT expression
Pattern 11719.5%87
Pattern 25563.2%
Pattern 31517.2%
VEGF expression
tertiles
1° tertiles5272.2%72
2° tertiles1520,8%
3° tertiles56.9%
cut-off value
≤5%4156.9%72
>53143.1%
Patnaik grading
11213.8%87
26271.3%
31314.9%
Kiupel grading
Low grade6777.0%87
High grade2023.0%
Recurrence
Yes1219.0%63
No5181.0%
Table
Table 3. Association between immunohistochemical markers, histological grading, recurrence, VEGF expression, and modified TATE.
Table 3. Association between immunohistochemical markers, histological grading, recurrence, VEGF expression, and modified TATE.
Modified TATEVEGF (2 Categories)VEGF (3 Categories)
Variablep-Valuep-Valuep-Value
KIT expression0.0150.1850.033
Ki-67 expression (3 groups)0.7860.9320.704
Ki-67 expression (4 groups)0.8090.9860.588
VEGF (cut-off value 5%)0.250////
VEGF (tertiles)0.445////
Patnaik grading0.0410.1770.986
Kiupel grading0.0220.0190.896
Recurrence0.0000.1040.433
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Galietta, V.; Parisi, F.; Cocumelli, C.; Pierini, A.; Poli, A.; Scaramozzino, P.; Spallucci, V.; Millanta, F. Preliminary Assessment of Tumor-Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) in Canine Mast Cell Tumors: Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance and Its Association with Neoangiogenesis. Animals 2023, 13, 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020283

AMA Style

Galietta V, Parisi F, Cocumelli C, Pierini A, Poli A, Scaramozzino P, Spallucci V, Millanta F. Preliminary Assessment of Tumor-Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) in Canine Mast Cell Tumors: Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance and Its Association with Neoangiogenesis. Animals. 2023; 13(2):283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020283

Chicago/Turabian Style

Galietta, Valentina, Francesca Parisi, Cristiano Cocumelli, Alessio Pierini, Alessandro Poli, Paola Scaramozzino, Valentina Spallucci, and Francesca Millanta. 2023. "Preliminary Assessment of Tumor-Associated Tissue Eosinophilia (TATE) in Canine Mast Cell Tumors: Prevalence and Prognostic Relevance and Its Association with Neoangiogenesis" Animals 13, no. 2: 283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020283

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop