Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Mother Goat Presence during Rearing on Kids’ Response to Isolation and to an Arena Test
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Proteomics Analysis of In Vitro Canine Oviductal Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Proxy Measures and Novel Strategies for Estimating Nitrogen Utilisation Efficiency in Dairy Cattle
Open AccessArticle

Alternative Management Systems of Beef Cattle Manure for Reducing Nitrogen Loadings: A Case-Study Approach

1
College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
3
National Center of International Joint Research of Bioenergy Science and Technology, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
4
College of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Stefan Gunnarson
Animals 2021, 11(2), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020574
Received: 20 December 2020 / Revised: 29 January 2021 / Accepted: 18 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
Livestock manure is one of the primary sources of agricultural nonpoint source pollution and poses a great threat to the environment and human health. Sustainable management of manure via recycling is an effective means to tackle the problem. Based on field interviews in China, four alternative manure management systems were investigated: Compost-based systems, product-based systems, substrate-based systems, and biogas-based systems. For each system, the reasons of emergence, success factors, risk factors, operation mechanism, scalability, key elements, and environmental effects were discussed. Results showed that the adoption of a system is driven by various factors and market-oriented operation is the dominant operation mechanism of all the manure management systems. Compared to direct application of manure to croplands, all the manure management systems can reduce nitrogen loadings from livestock farms and lower their environmental effects. Specifically, biogas-based systems can reduce nitrogen loadings to the greatest extent, followed by product-based systems and substrate-based systems, and then by compost-based systems. Integrated management of manure with mixed recycling systems is imperative for reducing its environmental effects, which can benefit from the increasing role of third-party entities in manure recycling. Policy implications were also discussed.
Livestock manure is one of the main sources of agricultural nonpoint source pollution and poses a great threat to the environment and human health. Sustainable management of manure via recycling is an effective means to tackle the problem. Based on field interviews in China, multiple case studies were employed to investigate alternative manure management systems. Four conclusions arose. First, compost-based systems, product-based systems, substrate-based systems, and biogas-based systems were identified as four main types of manure management systems, with each possessing its success factors and risk factors. The adoption of a system was driven by various factors. Second, market-oriented operation was the dominant operation mechanism of all the manure management systems. Third, compared to direct application of manure to croplands, all the four manure management systems could reduce nitrogen loadings from livestock farms and lower their environmental effects. Among the systems, biogas-based systems could reduce nitrogen loadings to the greatest extent, followed by product-based systems and substrate-based systems, and then by compost-based systems. Lastly, integrated management of manure with mixed recycling systems is imperative for reducing its environmental effects, which can benefit from the increasing role of third-party entities in manure recycling. Policy implications were also discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: beef cattle; sustainable manure management; recycling systems; nitrogen loadings beef cattle; sustainable manure management; recycling systems; nitrogen loadings
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Ghimire, S.; Wang, J.; Dong, R.; Li, Q. Alternative Management Systems of Beef Cattle Manure for Reducing Nitrogen Loadings: A Case-Study Approach. Animals 2021, 11, 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020574

AMA Style

Wang Y, Ghimire S, Wang J, Dong R, Li Q. Alternative Management Systems of Beef Cattle Manure for Reducing Nitrogen Loadings: A Case-Study Approach. Animals. 2021; 11(2):574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020574

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yubin; Ghimire, Suraj; Wang, Jingjing; Dong, Renjie; Li, Qian. 2021. "Alternative Management Systems of Beef Cattle Manure for Reducing Nitrogen Loadings: A Case-Study Approach" Animals 11, no. 2: 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020574

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop