Next Article in Journal
Bacteriophages as Potential Clinical Immune Modulators
Next Article in Special Issue
Efficacy of an Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) Vaccine on the Incidence and Severity of Traveler’s Diarrhea (TD): Evaluation of Alternative Endpoints and a TD Severity Score
Previous Article in Journal
Considerations of COVID-19 in Ophthalmology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heat-Labile Enterotoxin Decreases Macrophage Phagocytosis of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/microorganisms11092221
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seroprevalence Study of Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Antigens in Globally Diverse Populations

by
Frederick Matthew Kuhlmann
1,
Vadim Grigura
1,
Timothy J. Vickers
1,
Michael G. Prouty
2,
Lora L. Iannotti
3,
Sherlie Jean Louis Dulience
3 and
James M. Fleckenstein
1,4,*
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
2
U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6—NAMRU 6, Lima 15001, Peru
3
Institute for Public Health, Brown School, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
4
Medicine Service, Infectious Diseases, Saint Louis VA Health Care System, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(9), 2221; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092221
Submission received: 18 July 2023 / Revised: 28 August 2023 / Accepted: 30 August 2023 / Published: 31 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Infection and Vaccine-Mediated Immunity)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are common causes of infectious diarrhea among young children of low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) and travelers to these regions. Despite their significant contributions to the morbidity and mortality associated with childhood and traveler’s diarrhea, no licensed vaccines are available. Current vaccine strategies may benefit from the inclusion of additional conserved antigens, which may contribute to broader coverage and enhanced efficacy, given their key roles in facilitating intestinal colonization and effective enterotoxin delivery. EatA and EtpA are widely conserved in diverse populations of ETEC, but their immunogenicity has only been studied in controlled human infection models and a population of children in Bangladesh. Here, we compared serologic responses to EatA, EtpA and heat-labile toxin in populations from endemic regions including Haitian children and subjects residing in Egypt, Cameroon, and Peru to US children and adults where ETEC infections are sporadic. We observed elevated IgG and IgA responses in individuals from endemic regions to each of the antigens studied. In a cohort of Haitian children, we observed increased immune responses following exposure to each of the profiled antigens. These findings reflect the wide distribution of ETEC infections across multiple endemic regions and support further evaluation of EatA and EtpA as candidate ETEC vaccine antigens.

1. Introduction

Despite overall reductions in mortality from infectious diarrhea, the incidence of diarrheal disease due to bacterial pathogens and associated morbidity among vulnerable children remain high [1,2,3]. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are among the most common contributors to the diarrheal disease burden [4]. Acute presentations of ETEC infections can range from mild diarrhea to severe cholera-like watery diarrhea [5] and death. In contrast to Vibrio cholerae, ETEC are genetically heterogeneous organisms belonging to multiple serotypes [6] that are often associated with repeated episodes [7] of symptomatic disease in young children of low-middle income countries (LMICs). Repeated diarrheal illnesses from ETEC and other enteropathogens are associated with intestinal damage and enteric dysfunction leading to malabsorption, impaired growth and impaired cognitive development [8,9], negatively impacting human capital in low-income regions.
Hundreds of millions of ETEC infections are estimated to occur each year among infants and children in LMICs [10], as well as among travelers to ETEC endemic areas lacking necessities of clean water and basic sanitation [11]. Therefore, vaccine development remains a high priority. ETEC infections drive empiric antibiotic use, potentially promoting the development of antimicrobial resistance [12,13]. Fortunately, as infections decline significantly after the age of two years in endemic regions, natural infections ultimately appear to offer protection against symptomatic illness [7], suggesting that an ETEC vaccine is feasible, and several ETEC vaccine candidates are currently being evaluated [14].
ETEC share in their capacity to elaborate heat-labile (LT) and/or heat-stable (ST) enterotoxins [15]. Their diversity arises from surface-expressed antigens known as colonization factors (CFs). ETEC vaccines in development to date have principally targeted the most common colonization factors (CFs). However, the identification of more than 30 antigenically distinct target antigens has prompted investigation of other conserved antigens to complement existing approaches [16,17].
Two candidate antigens, the EatA mucinase [18,19], and the EtpA adhesin [20] have emerged in the search for novel ETEC virulence factors and might contribute to development of a broadly protective vaccine. Both proteins are specific to the ETEC pathovar and are highly conserved among a geographically diverse collection of isolates [21]. Both antigens are expressed by multiple strains linked to severe cholera-like illness [5,22,23], suggesting that these play important roles in disease. Likewise, in studies of a birth cohort of young Bangladeshi children, both antigens were strongly associated with symptomatic ETEC infections, and antibodies against either antigen appear to be associated with protection from symptomatic illness [24].
Details regarding structure and function of these secreted proteins are beginning to provide important insights into the molecular pathogenesis of ETEC, which can inform their use as vaccine candidates. EatA, a member of the serine protease autotransporter of Enterobactericiae (SPATE) family of molecules [19], specifically degrades MUC2 secreted by goblet cells [18] to facilitate the intimate interactions between ETEC and target intestinal epithelial cells required for efficient toxin delivery [25]. EtpA is a high-molecular-weight extracellular glycoprotein secreted by a two-partner secretion (TPS) system encoded by the etpBAC locus [26]. EtpA forms a molecular bridge [20] between the bacteria and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) target glycans abundant in intestinal mucosa [27] to accelerate delivery of both LT [28] and ST [29]. Notably, GalNAc is also the terminal sugar residue on human A blood group glycans present both on erythrocytes and intestinal epithelia. Specific interactions between EtpA and human A blood group glycans are thought to explain the increased diarrheal severity observed following ETEC infection among human volunteers [30] and young children [7] belonging to the A blood group.
To date, molecular epidemiology studies have suggested that these antigens may be broadly conserved across a diverse population of strains [21,31]. Still, additional data are needed to examine their distribution and immunogenicity among different populations at risk of ETEC infection. As seroprevalence estimates likely reflect the distribution of ETEC expressing these antigens, data from diverse populations could provide information regarding the degree to which the EtpA and EatA, alone and together, are present in different populations and guide antigen selection for vaccine development [32]. Therefore, we sought to expand our examination of serologic responses to these antigens to other ETEC endemic regions [24].
To advance our understanding of host responses to EatA and EtpA, we analyzed a convenience sample of serum and plasma available from diverse global settings using an optimized ELISA assay. We hypothesized that antibody responses to these antigens would be elevated in regions of endemicity. The analyses presented here corroborate our earlier molecular epidemiology studies suggesting that ETEC producing EtpA and EatA are widely distributed and that these antigens are immunogenic. These observations reenforce support for the further evaluation of EatA and EtpA as candidate ETEC vaccine antigens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Recombinant Antigen Production

Polyhistidine-tagged recombinant secreted EtpA and EatA passenger proteins were purified from culture supernatants by metal affinity chromatography (HisTrap, Pharmacia) as described previously [33], while 8x-His tagged EatA passenger domain was purified from culture supernatant of strain Top10 (pTV001, jf3227) (Table S1) and recombinant polyhistidine-tagged EtpA purified as previously described from culture supernatants of Top10 (pJL017/pJL0130, jf1696) following induction with 0.005% arabinose. Recombinant proteins were then examined by Coomassie staining to verify purity. Western immunoblotting was performed using human serum (1:4000 dilution) and anti-human IgG (dilution 1:1000) to assess the specificity of the immune response.

2.2. Human Serum Samples

Archived blood samples previously collected in 2016 from Cameroon [34] or circa 1997 from Egypt (Qalubiya Governorate) ([35]) had been obtained during the course of field studies on filarial infections. Samples from Cameroon had been preserved as dried blood spots on HemaSpot HF cards (Spot On Sciences, San Francisco, CA, USA), and had been stored in the dark at room temperature. One blade from the HemaSpot cards was submerged in a microfuge tube using 300 μL of PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin. The blade was kept at room temperature overnight, then centrifuged at 2500× g for 7 min and the supernatant was removed and stored. This suspension was estimated to equate to approximately a 1:200 dilution based on similar studies with dried blood spots (see supplemental methods Figure S2) [36].
Serum samples from Egypt previously stored at −20 °C were thawed and aliquoted for antibody detection. All participants were over 10 years of age. Deidentified serum samples collected during routine clinical care and that would have otherwise been discarded were obtained from St. Louis Children’s hospital (children < 2 years of age) or Barnes Hospital (adults aged 30–50 years of age). Deidentified samples from Peru included adults enrolled in a dengue seroprevalence study and similarly aged with no corresponding metadata. Samples from Haitian children (6 months to 3 years of age) were obtained from a separate pilot study [37] in which both fecal and plasma samples were collected one month apart.

2.3. ELISA

Additional information regarding assay development and optimization is provided in the supplemental materials (Figure S1). ELISA parameters were first optimized using murine samples as described in the supplemental methods. ELISAs targeting the novel antigens EatA and EtpA, as well as LT, were subsequently optimized to detect antibody responses in human samples. EtpA and EatA ELISA plates were prepared by coating individual wells with 100 μL of the respective proteins in carbonate buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, 0.2 g/L NaN3, pH 9.6), at 1 μg/mL or 10 μg/mL for EtpA and EatA, respectively. Plates were then incubated overnight at 4 °C. LT ELISA plates were generated by incubating plates overnight at 4 °C, with 1 μg/mL GM1 ganglioside (Avanti, Birmingham, AL, USA: 860065P) in carbonate buffer, 100 µL/well. The following day, plates were washed and then incubated with LT (courtesy of Dr. John Clements, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine) 1 µg/mL overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed 3 times in PBS with 0.05% Tween (PBST), dried for four hours at 37 °C, sealed, and stored in the dark at 4 °C for up to 3 months. When ready for use, plates were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS in for one hour at 37 °C then washed in PBST × 3. Primary sera were added at specified dilutions (1:800 for all IgG assays, 1:400 for anti EtpA IgA assays, and 1:200 for anti-LT and EatA IgA assays) and incubated for one hour at 37 °C, then washed five times in Phosphate-buffered saline–0.5% Tween 20 (PBS-T). Optimal screening dilutions were determined by performing 2-fold serial dilutions of a subset of samples to identify a dilution where the majority of samples remained in the dynamic range of the kinetic ELISA assay [38] with minimal background in negative controls (children in the US). Plates were incubated for 45 min with 1:20,000 dilution of HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA: 309-035-006) or HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgA antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch: 309-035-011). After washing, plates were developed using 3,3′ 5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB, SeraCare, Gaitersburg, MD, USA: 5120-0074). ELISA readings were recorded kinetically on a plate reader (BioTek, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and analyzed using Gen5 software (v2.00.18) as before [24,38]. Results were log10 transformed to normalize the distribution. Additional details on use of dried blood spots (DBS) are provided in supplemental data.
To assess avidity, freshly prepared 6 M urea in PBS was added after incubation with primary serum. Plates were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, washed 3 times in PBS, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies as above. The ratio of Vmax in urea-treated vs. untreated wells (multiplied by 100) was calculated to determine the avidity index.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism Version 9 was used to compare means across populations using t-testing or ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons as indicated. General linear models assessing the associations between ETEC antigens and immune responses as well as binary logistic regression were performed using SPSS v.27.

2.5. Ethics Statement

The serosurvey was approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (IRB, 202010227). Individual human serum collections were all obtained separately under approved protocols. Sharing of samples from Naval Medical Research Unit 6 was approved by the local IRB. Samples from Haiti were collected under works approved by the Washington University Institutional Review Board (202007027) and the National Bioethics Committee in Haiti (Comité National de Bioéthique). Samples from Egypt and Cameroon were collected under separate studies performed at Washington University.

3. Results

3.1. Seroprevalence

We hypothesized that humoral immune responses targeting ETEC antigens would be appreciably higher in individuals from endemic regions than in a nonendemic region (St. Louis, MO, USA). Using optimized ELISA assays, we explored the breadth of human responses to ETEC antigens from Cameroon, Egypt, Haiti, Peru, and the United States (Figure 1). Young children (<3 years old) in the United States would presumably be less likely to have traveled or be exposed to ETEC based on the low prevalence of ETEC in the US relative to adults [39,40]. Accordingly, we found that serum IgG responses to EatA, EtpA and LT were significantly elevated in Haitian children under three years of age relative to young children in the US (Figure 1A). In comparison to US adults, Cameroonian and Peruvian IgG responses to all three antigens were significantly elevated, while Egyptian subjects (≥10 years of age) had significantly elevated IgG responses to LT alone.
We also observed significant increases in IgA responses in children from Haiti and in adults. Young children in Haiti were found to have substantially elevated serum IgA responses to each of the antigens tested (Figure 1B) relative to US controls. Anti-EtpA responses were elevated in Peruvian adults relative to subjects in Egypt and Cameroon. However, US adults also had elevated IgA responses, which were significantly elevated compared to US children (p < 0.0001). For EatA, IgA responses were elevated in Peruvian adults relative to Egyptian subjects. US adult responses to EatA were again elevated, much like those observed in samples from Egypt. Finally, for LT, Peruvian IgA responses were also elevated relative to US adults. While IgA antibody levels in US adults were surprisingly higher than those of children in the US, we hypothesized that antibody avidity would be higher in individuals from endemic populations, reflecting more frequent exposures to ETEC. Intriguingly, however, adults from the United States (Saint Louis, MO, USA) were noted to have slightly higher IgA avidity to EtpA relative to individuals from Egypt or Peru. By contrast, anti-EatA IgA avidity values for Egyptian subjects proved to be higher than those observed in samples from Peru (Figure S3). Within individuals, antibody responses to each of the antigens (EtpA, EatA, and LT) and/or each isotype were variably correlated and these results differed by site (Table S2a–f). In general, however, EtpA responses tended to correlate with EatA responses, likely reflecting the conservation of these antigens and their common coexpression in individual isolates [21].

3.2. Immunogenicity

Antigens recognized during natural infections can focus vaccine design. Using data from a recently completed case–control study in Cap-Haïtien [37], we assessed immune responses to novel antigens following infection. We previously demonstrated that anti-EatA and anti-EtpA antibody responses increase with age and may correlate with protection from symptomatic disease in Bangladeshi children [24]. Similarly, we demonstrated that among Haitian children under three years of age, antibody responses increase with age (Table S3) with the exception of anti-LT IgA responses. Conversely, changes in antibody responses over one month were negatively associated with age, suggesting children may reach maximal inducible responses as they age (Table S4). In unadjusted analysis, EatA IgA and LT IgG were significantly induced upon antigen exposure relative to unexposed participants (Table 1).
In adjusting for additional variables associated with changes in immune responses, age remained significantly associated with changes in antibody levels (Table 2). Of note, the interaction effect between the EtpA and acute diarrheal symptoms was also significant, suggesting that symptomatic disease modifies the anti-EtpA IgG response.
Collectively, the data obtained in the present study reflect prior observations of immunogenicity of EtpA and EatA among children and adults in Bangladesh. The recent data lend further support to the idea that these antigens are widely distributed among ETEC and retain immunogenicity in diverse populations following natural ETEC infections.

4. Discussion

To further inform vaccine strategies to prevent ETEC infections, we characterized the immune response to candidate ETEC antigens and the LT toxin. We show that humoral immune responses to these antigens are common across a globally diverse set of samples. We selected sites that are either known or presumed to have high burdens of disease (Egypt, Cameroon, Peru, and Haiti) and compared our results to areas with a relatively low burden of disease (adults and children from the US). Our results confirm that ETEC infections in these populations are common and provide additional impetus to pursue ETEC vaccination strategies that include novel antigens EatA and EtpA, which have not been targeted in canonical approaches to vaccine development.
We utilized anti-LT responses as a marker of ETEC burden, as roughly two-thirds of all ETEC isolates express LT alone or in combination with ST. In endemic regions, anti-LT responses were universally elevated, supporting the commonality of ETEC exposure across these populations. While anti-LT responses cross-react with cholera toxin, there is limited reason to believe that our findings are reflective of cholera exposure, as cholera was only circulating in Cameroon at the time of sample collections (our study in Haiti pre-dates the reemergence of cholera that occurred in 2022). Moreover, anti-LT responses across a broad age range may suggest frequent reexposure, as immunity is thought to decline over time without exposure.
Our recent studies have focused on the potential role for EatA and EtpA to complement canonical approaches to ETEC vaccine development based primarily on colonization factor antigens. Antibodies directed at either novel antigen appear to limit intestinal colonization in animal models and impair pathogen–host interactions in vitro, a key step in the molecular pathogenesis of ETEC [41]. We have shown that these antigens are conserved among a diverse global collection of ETEC isolates [21,42], that they appear to contribute to virulence as well as adaptive immune responses to ETEC in young children in Bangladesh [24], and that they appear to be immunogenic in human volunteers [43,44]. However, the immunogenicity of these important virulence molecules has yet to be similarly demonstrated in diverse settings where ETEC remains highly endemic. Importantly, the present studies provide further evidence that these antigens are widely distributed among a diverse population of ETEC and that immunodominant regions of these molecules are retained. Our findings are also consistent with recent ETEC microarray data from studies on young children in Zambia conducted as part of phase I testing of the oral inactivated ETVAX vaccine that noted substantial IgG immunoreactivity to these antigens prior to vaccination [45].
Interestingly, we also surprisingly observed antibodies directed at these novel antigens in sera from US adults despite low titers in US children. This finding may reflect cross-reactivity with similar antigens from other species, travel to endemic regions, or exposure to ETEC within the US [39]. While ETEC have not been considered to be endemic in the US, multiple domestic foodborne outbreaks have occurred [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Because testing was previously not readily available in most clinical laboratories, sporadic cases of ETEC were frequently overlooked and only came to recognition following involvement of state or federal resources during outbreak investigations. Nevertheless, with the advent of culture-independent diagnostic testing platforms [54,55,56], ETEC have increasingly been identified in clinical laboratories. Indeed, recent studies indicate that less than half of domestic ETEC cases result from international travel, indicating the presence of as yet uncharacterized endemic foci of ETEC [40]. Previous molecular characterization of these domestically acquired isolates, including whole-genome sequencing, has demonstrated that they are remarkably similar to strains from known endemic regions, including expression of both EtpA and EatA [21].
The surprisingly high serum IgA levels directed against both EatA and EtpA among US adults relative to young children led us to examine whether IgA antibody avidity might differ from samples obtained in endemic regions. Although we presumed that more frequent exposure to ETEC in regions where it is endemic would result in more effective B cell maturation and higher antibody avidity to common ETEC antigens [57,58], this was not borne out in avidity testing, findings that could confound future vaccine studies in US adults. As antibody avidity is thought to reflect affinity of polyvalent antibodies in interaction with their respective target antigen, avidity has been used to discriminate between primary and secondary infections [59] and as a surrogate marker for protective immunity in vaccine trials [60]. High-avidity mucosal IgA can also facilitate clearance of pathogens from the intestinal lumen [61]. It is possible that differences in methodology for sample collection and preservation could have impacted the results of our comparisons. Nevertheless, further study is needed to replicate these findings and to explore responses to EtpA and EatA following vaccination.
Antigenic similarity between novel antigens studied here and virulence molecules of other pathogens could account for some of the immunoreactivity observed in serologic analysis involving US adults. EatA shares structural features, and likely shared epitopes with other autotransporter molecules including SepA of Shigella [62], with which it shares more than 70% identity [19]. Indeed, Eat or SepA has been identified in other E. coli pathovars [63,64], suggesting that exposure to these antigens may be relatively common. Likewise, EtpA shares overall structural homology with multiple antigens belonging to the two-partner secretion family of virulence molecules [65], including filamentous hemagglutinin, a component of acellular pertussis vaccines [66]. However, whether natural infections with Bordetella pertussis or vaccination elicits antibodies that cross-react with EtpA is presently unknown.
Elucidation of correlates of protection against ETEC infection would greatly facilitate vaccine efficacy studies [67,68,69]. Determination of fecal IgA, or enumeration of α4β7 integrin-expressing, “gut-homing,” antibody-secreting lymphocytes [70] may afford more direct mechanistic correlates of protection, yet neither approach is easily performed in field settings on large numbers of subjects. This has led to evaluation of serologic assays in evaluating protection afforded by vaccines for enteric pathogens [71]. Earlier seroepidemiologic studies of ETEC have yielded mixed results with respect to protection afforded preexisting serum antibodies against colonization factors or heat-labile toxin [7,72,73]. In earlier studies, we identified an association between anti-EatA or EtpA antibody responses and protection from subsequent symptomatic ETEC infection in Bangladeshi children [24]. Although we were able to demonstrate the immunogenicity of these antigens as Haitian children developed antibody responses after exposure to EatA and LT, as well as when symptomatic with EtpA+ ETEC infections, the work in Haiti was not designed to evaluate the protection associated with exposure to ETEC. Collectively, the results from Bangladesh and Haiti do suggest that ETEC expressing these antigens are likely circulating in diverse populations of young children where they are demonstrably immunogenic. Nevertheless, further data are needed to determine the protection afforded by immune responses to EatA and EtpA.
Although serosurveys can provide important insights regarding global disease burden and can be used to direct control or elimination strategies [74], they are prone to selection bias [75]. The present study is likely biased by the convenience of available samples and limited by acknowledged differences in sample collection and preservation.
Despite clear resource limitations in Haiti that pose significant risks for diarrheal diseases, there is currently surprisingly scant granular information regarding ETEC prevalence in this country. Large population-wide studies of antibody responses to multiple pathogens including ETEC (based on IgG antibodies to LT) suggest high transmission of these pathogens to young children early in life (<3 years of age) [32,76,77]. Similarly, molecular surveys conducted in Haitian cholera treatment centers and community-based oral rehydration units suggest that the burden of ETEC in young children is high [78]. ETEC have also been linked recently to growth limitations in a population of young children living in Cap-Haïtien, Haiti [79]. Here, we demonstrate significant age-dependent antibody responses to each of the ETEC antigens tested in young children, likely reflecting a large burden of illness, and intense transmission at an early age in this population.
Overall, the studies reported here also provide further evidence that EtpA and EatA, not presently targeted in ETEC vaccines under development, deserve further scrutiny as antigens that can complement or simplify an otherwise complex approach to achieving broad protection against these highly heterogeneous pathogens. Currently, ETVAX, a whole-cell killed vaccine of multiple strains targeting a total of four CFs (CFA/I, CS3, CS5, and CS6) combined with a novel toxoid (LTCBA) based on B subunits of LT and cholera toxin (CT), is the most advanced vaccine to enter later stages of clinical development [80,81,82]. Recombinant adhesins based on CFA/I [83] and CS6 [84] have also advanced through safety and immunogenicity studies. Although these canonical approaches may afford protection against related CF antigens, the remarkable diversity of these antigens as well as shifts in antigen prevalence over time [85] need to be considered in rational vaccine design [15]. Whether the addition of EtpA and EatA to existing strategies will obviate the need to target multiple CFs certainly needs to be tested empirically. However, it is hoped that additional details emerging from ongoing structure–function studies of these antigens combined with identification of critical protective epitopes recognized during ETEC infections will facilitate their inclusion toward development of a broadly protective vaccine.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11092221/s1. Figure S1. Protection against ETEC colonization correlates with serum IgG and IgA responses; Figure S2. Comparison of Dried Blood Spots and sera dilutions; Figure S3. Avidity index for adult IgA responses; Table S1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in these studies; Table S2. Correlation of antibody responses within individuals at different sites; Table S3. Correlaton of antibody responses and age; Table S4. Negative correlation between ∆antibody response/one month and age.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.M.K. and J.M.F.; methodology, F.M.K., V.G. and T.J.V., sample collection in Haiti, S.J.L.D., L.L.I. and F.M.K.; sample collection in Peru, M.G.P.; formal analysis, F.M.K. resources, F.M.K. and J.M.F.; data curation, F.M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, F.M.K.; writing—review and editing, J.M.F.; supervision, F.M.K.; project administration, F.M.K.; funding acquisition, J.M.F., F.M.K. and L.L.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

These studies were supported in part by funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants K23 AI130389 (F.M.K.), R01AI089894 and R01AI170949 (J.M.F.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs BX004825-01. The work in Haiti was supported by a grant from the Office of the Vice Chancellor of Research at Washington University (F.M.K., L.L.I.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, NIAID, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the Department of Defense.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in, FigShare at the following doi: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066372, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066369, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066366, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066363, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066360, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24066357 (accessed on 28 August 2023).

Acknowledgments

Previously archived deidentified samples from Egypt and Cameroon were kindly provided by Gary Weil, and Philip Budge, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

JMF is listed as inventor on patent US 8323668 B2 pertaining to EtpA. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Local Burden of Disease Diarrhoea Collaborators. Mapping geographical inequalities in childhood diarrhoeal morbidity and mortality in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000–2017: Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2020, 395, 1779–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Troeger, C.; Colombara, D.V.; Rao, P.C.; Khalil, I.A.; Brown, A.; Brewer, T.G.; Guerrant, R.L.; Houpt, E.R.; Kotloff, K.L.; Misra, K.; et al. Global disability-adjusted life-year estimates of long-term health burden and undernutrition attributable to diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e255–e269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Troeger, C.; Forouzanfar, M.; Rao, P.C.; Khalil, I.; Brown, A.; Reiner, R.C.; Fullman, N.; Thompson, R.L.; Abajobir, A.; Ahmed, M.; et al. Estimates of global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoeal diseases: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 909–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Kuhlmann, F.M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Infections. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2019, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sack, R.B.; Gorbach, S.L.; Banwell, J.G.; Jacobs, B.; Chatterjee, B.D.; Mitra, R.C. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolated from patients with severe cholera-like disease. J. Infect. Dis. 1971, 123, 378–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wolf, M.K. Occurrence, distribution, and associations of O and H serogroups, colonization factor antigens, and toxins of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 10, 569–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qadri, F.; Saha, A.; Ahmed, T.; Al Tarique, A.; Begum, Y.A.; Svennerholm, A.M. Disease burden due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the first 2 years of life in an urban community in Bangladesh. Infect. Immun. 2007, 75, 3961–3968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guerrant, R.L.; Bolick, D.T.; Swann, J.R. Modeling Enteropathy or Diarrhea with the Top Bacterial and Protozoal Pathogens: Differential Determinants of Outcomes. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 1020–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Watanabe, K.; Petri, W.A., Jr. Environmental Enteropathy: Elusive but Significant Subclinical Abnormalities in Developing Countries. eBioMedicine 2016, 10, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Khalil, I.A.; Troeger, C.; Blacker, B.F.; Rao, P.C.; Brown, A.; Atherly, D.E.; Brewer, T.G.; Engmann, C.M.; Houpt, E.R.; Kang, G.; et al. Morbidity and mortality due to shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1229–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bourgeois, A.L.; Wierzba, T.F.; Walker, R.I. Status of vaccine research and development for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vaccine 2016, 34, 2880–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Khalil, I.; Walker, R.; Porter, C.K.; Muhib, F.; Chilengi, R.; Cravioto, A.; Guerrant, R.; Svennerholm, A.M.; Qadri, F.; Baqar, S.; et al. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccines: Priority activities to enable product development, licensure, and global access. Vaccine 2021, 39, 4266–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Frost, I.; Sati, H.; Garcia-Vello, P.; Hasso-Agopsowicz, M.; Lienhardt, C.; Gigante, V.; Beyer, P. The role of bacterial vaccines in the fight against antimicrobial resistance: An analysis of the preclinical and clinical development pipeline. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e113–e125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. PDVAC_ETEC_18-June_Executive-Summary.pdf. Available online: https://www.who.int/immunization/research/meetings_workshops/PDVAC_ETEC_18-June_Executive-Summary.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2021).
  15. Fleckenstein, J.M. Confronting Challenges to Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Vaccine Development. Front. Trop. Dis. 2021, 2, 709907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Isidean, S.D.; Riddle, M.S.; Savarino, S.J.; Porter, C.K. A systematic review of ETEC epidemiology focusing on colonization factor and toxin expression. Vaccine 2011, 29, 6167–6178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vidal, R.M.; Muhsen, K.; Tennant, S.M.; Svennerholm, A.M.; Sow, S.O.; Sur, D.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Faruque, A.S.G.; Saha, D.; Adegbola, R.; et al. Colonization factors among enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from children with moderate-to-severe diarrhea and from matched controls in the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, P.; Luo, Q.; Vickers, T.J.; Sheikh, A.; Lewis, W.G.; Fleckenstein, J.M. EatA, an Immunogenic Protective Antigen of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Degrades Intestinal Mucin. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Patel, S.K.; Dotson, J.; Allen, K.P.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Identification and molecular characterization of EatA, an autotransporter protein of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1786–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roy, K.; Hilliard, G.M.; Hamilton, D.J.; Luo, J.; Ostmann, M.M.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli EtpA mediates adhesion between flagella and host cells. Nature 2009, 457, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuhlmann, F.M.; Martin, J.; Hazen, T.H.; Vickers, T.J.; Pashos, M.; Okhuysen, P.C.; Gomez-Duarte, O.G.; Cebelinski, E.; Boxrud, D.; Del Canto, F.; et al. Conservation and global distribution of non-canonical antigens in Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Finkelstein, R.A.; Vasil, M.L.; Jones, J.R.; Anderson, R.A.; Barnard, T. Clinical cholera caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1976, 3, 382–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vicente, A.C.; Teixeira, L.F.; Iniguez-Rojas, L.; Luna, M.G.; Silva, L.; Andrade, J.R.; Guth, B.E. Outbreaks of cholera-like diarrhoea caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2005, 99, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuhlmann, F.M.; Laine, R.O.; Afrin, S.; Nakajima, R.; Akhtar, M.; Vickers, T.; Parker, K.; Nizam, N.N.; Grigura, V.; Goss, C.W.; et al. Contribution of Noncanonical Antigens to Virulence and Adaptive Immunity in Human Infection with Enterotoxigenic E. coli. Infect. Immun. 2021, 89, e00041-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dorsey, F.C.; Fischer, J.F.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Directed delivery of heat-labile enterotoxin by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Cell. Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1516–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Roy, K.; Fischer, J.F.; Burkitt, M. Identification of a two-partner secretion locus of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 2245–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumar, P.; Kuhlmann, F.M.; Bhullar, K.; Yang, H.; Vallance, B.A.; Xia, L.; Luo, Q.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Dynamic Interactions of a Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Adhesin with Intestinal Mucins Govern Epithelium Engagement and Toxin Delivery. Infect. Immun. 2016, 84, 3608–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roy, K.; Hamilton, D.J.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Cooperative role of antibodies against heat-labile toxin and the EtpA Adhesin in preventing toxin delivery and intestinal colonization by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012, 19, 1603–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhu, Y.; Luo, Q.; Davis, S.M.; Westra, C.; Vickers, T.J.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Molecular Determinants of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Heat-Stable Toxin Secretion and Delivery. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kumar, P.; Kuhlmann, F.M.; Chakraborty, S.; Bourgeois, A.L.; Foulke-Abel, J.; Tumala, B.; Vickers, T.J.; Sack, D.A.; DeNearing, B.; Harro, C.D.; et al. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-blood group A interactions intensify diarrheal severity. J. Clin. Investig. 2018, 128, 3298–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rasko, D.A.; Del Canto, F.; Luo, Q.; Fleckenstein, J.M.; Vidal, R.; Hazen, T.H. Comparative genomic analysis and molecular examination of the diversity of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from Chile. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chan, Y.; Martin, D.; Mace, K.E.; Jean, S.E.; Stresman, G.; Drakeley, C.; Chang, M.A.; Lemoine, J.F.; Udhayakumar, V.; Lammie, P.J.; et al. Multiplex Serology for Measurement of IgG Antibodies Against Eleven Infectious Diseases in a National Serosurvey: Haiti 2014–2015. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 897013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Roy, K. Purification of recombinant high molecular weight two-partner secretion proteins from Escherichia coli. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 1083–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hertz, M.I.; Nana-Djeunga, H.; Kamgno, J.; Jelil Njouendou, A.; Chawa Chunda, V.; Wanji, S.; Rush, A.; Fischer, P.U.; Weil, G.J.; Budge, P.J. Identification and characterization of Loa loa antigens responsible for cross-reactivity with rapid diagnostic tests for lymphatic filariasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Weil, G.J.; Ramzy, R.M.; El Setouhy, M.; Kandil, A.M.; Ahmed, E.S.; Faris, R. A longitudinal study of Bancroftian filariasis in the Nile Delta of Egypt: Baseline data and one-year follow-up. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1999, 61, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bhuiyan, M.S.; Hossain, M.; Sharmin, S.; Shirin, A.; Khanam, F.; Chowdhury, F.; Akter, A.; Khan, A.I.; Uddin, M.I.; Bhuiyan, T.R.; et al. Assessment of disease specific immune responses in enteric diseases using dried blood spot (DBS). PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Diaz, J.N.; Dulience, S.J.L.; Wolthausen, N.; Jiang, X.; Gyimah, E.; Marhône Pierre, F.J.; Kuhlmann, F.M.; Iannotti, L.L. Choline, docosahexaenoic acid, and diarrheal disease associated with growth faltering in a case-control study. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2022, 6, nzac140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsang, V.C.; Wilson, B.C.; Maddison, S.E. Kinetic studies of a quantitative single-tube enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Clin. Chem. 1980, 26, 1255–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Medus, C.; Besser, J.M.; Juni, B.A.; Koziol, B.; Lappi, V.; Smith, K.E.; Hedberg, C.W. Long-Term Sentinel Surveillance for Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli in Minnesota. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, ofw003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Buuck, S.; Smith, K.; Fowler, R.C.; Cebelinski, E.; Lappi, V.; Boxrud, D.; Medus, C. Epidemiology of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Minnesota, 2016–2017. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Sheikh, A. Emerging Themes in the Molecular Pathogenesis of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 224, S813–S820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Luo, Q.; Qadri, F.; Kansal, R.; Rasko, D.A.; Sheikh, A.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Conservation and immunogenicity of novel antigens in diverse isolates of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0003446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chakraborty, S.; Randall, A.; Vickers, T.J.; Molina, D.; Harro, C.D.; DeNearing, B.; Brubaker, J.; Sack, D.A.; Bourgeois, A.L.; Felgner, P.L.; et al. Human Experimental Challenge with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Elicits Immune Responses to Canonical and Novel Antigens Relevant to Vaccine Development. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 1436–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chakraborty, S.; Randall, A.; Vickers, T.J.; Molina, D.; Harro, C.D.; DeNearing, B.; Brubaker, J.; Sack, D.A.; Bourgeois, A.L.; Felgner, P.L.; et al. Interrogation of a live-attenuated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine highlights features unique to wild-type infection. NPJ Vaccines 2019, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mubanga, C.; Simuyandi, M.; Mwape, K.; Chibesa, K.; Chisenga, C.; Chilyabanyama, O.N.; Randall, A.; Liang, X.; Glashoff, R.H.; Chilengi, R. Use of an ETEC Proteome Microarray to Evaluate Cross-Reactivity of ETVAX((R)) Vaccine-Induced IgG Antibodies in Zambian Children. Vaccines 2023, 11, 939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Roels, T.; Mellen, J.; Proctor, M.; Robinson, L.; Hulbert, K.; Wells, J.; Davis, J. A large foodborne outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection in Milwaukee. In Proceedings of the 35th Interscience Conference on Anitmicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA, 17–20 September 1995; p. 314. [Google Scholar]
  47. Roels, T.H.; Proctor, M.E.; Robinson, L.C.; Hulbert, K.; Bopp, C.A.; Davis, J.P. Clinical features of infections due to Escherichia coli producing heat-stable toxin during an outbreak in Wisconsin: A rarely suspected cause of diarrhea in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1998, 26, 898–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jain, S.; Chen, L.; Dechet, A.; Hertz, A.T.; Brus, D.L.; Hanley, K.; Wilson, B.; Frank, J.; Greene, K.D.; Parsons, M.; et al. An outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli associated with sushi restaurants in Nevada, 2004. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Devasia, R.A.; Jones, T.F.; Ward, J.; Stafford, L.; Hardin, H.; Bopp, C.; Beatty, M.; Mintz, E.; Schaffner, W. Endemically acquired foodborne outbreak of enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli serotype O169:H41. Am. J. Med. 2006, 119, 168.e7–168.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Beatty, M.E.; Adcock, P.M.; Smith, S.W.; Quinlan, K.; Kamimoto, L.A.; Rowe, S.Y.; Scott, K.; Conover, C.; Varchmin, T.; Bopp, C.A.; et al. Epidemic diarrhea due to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2006, 42, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Beatty, M.E.; Bopp, C.A.; Wells, J.G.; Greene, K.D.; Puhr, N.D.; Mintz, E.D. Enterotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O169:H41, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 518–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Dalton, C.B.; Mintz, E.D.; Wells, J.G.; Bopp, C.A.; Tauxe, R.V. Outbreaks of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in American adults: A clinical and epidemiologic profile. Epidemiol. Infect. 1999, 123, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Pattabiraman, V.; Katz, L.S.; Chen, J.C.; McCullough, A.E.; Trees, E. Genome wide characterization of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli serogroup O6 isolates from multiple outbreaks and sporadic infections from 1975–2016. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0208735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pattabiraman, V.; Parsons, M.B.; Bopp, C.A. Real-Time TaqMan PCR Assay for the Detection of Heat-Labile and Heat-Stable Enterotoxin Genes in a Geographically Diverse Collection of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Strains and Stool Specimens. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2016, 13, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fleckenstein, J.M.; Matthew Kuhlmann, F.; Sheikh, A. Acute Bacterial Gastroenteritis. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 50, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cybulski, R.J., Jr.; Bateman, A.C.; Bourassa, L.; Bryan, A.; Beail, B.; Matsumoto, J.; Cookson, B.T.; Fang, F.C. Clinical Impact of a Multiplex Gastrointestinal Polymerase Chain Reaction Panel in Patients With Acute Gastroenteritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 67, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Alam, M.M.; Aktar, A.; Afrin, S.; Rahman, M.A.; Aktar, S.; Uddin, T.; Rahman, M.A.; Al Mahbuba, D.; Chowdhury, F.; Khan, A.I.; et al. Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in Bangladeshi adults. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alam, M.M.; Arifuzzaman, M.; Ahmad, S.M.; Hosen, M.I.; Rahman, M.A.; Rashu, R.; Sheikh, A.; Ryan, E.T.; Calderwood, S.B.; Qadri, F. Study of avidity of antigen-specific antibody as a means of understanding development of long-term immunological memory after Vibrio cholerae O1 infection. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2013, 20, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. de Souza, V.A.; Fernandes, S.; Araujo, E.S.; Tateno, A.F.; Oliveira, O.M.; Oliveira, R.R.; Pannuti, C.S. Use of an immunoglobulin G avidity test to discriminate between primary and secondary dengue virus infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1782–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Goldblatt, D.; Vaz, A.R.; Miller, E. Antibody avidity as a surrogate marker of successful priming by Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines following infant immunization. J. Infect. Dis. 1998, 177, 1112–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moor, K.; Diard, M.; Sellin, M.E.; Felmy, B.; Wotzka, S.Y.; Toska, A.; Bakkeren, E.; Arnoldini, M.; Bansept, F.; Co, A.D.; et al. High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria. Nature 2017, 544, 498–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Benjelloun-Touimi, Z.; Sansonetti, P.J.; Parsot, C. SepA, the major extracellular protein of Shigella flexneri: Autonomous secretion and involvement in tissue invasion. Mol. Microbiol. 1995, 17, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Boisen, N.; Scheutz, F.; Rasko, D.A.; Redman, J.C.; Persson, S.; Simon, J.; Kotloff, K.L.; Levine, M.M.; Sow, S.; Tamboura, B.; et al. Genomic characterization of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli from children in Mali. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 205, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Boisen, N.; Osterlund, M.T.; Joensen, K.G.; Santiago, A.E.; Mandomando, I.; Cravioto, A.; Chattaway, M.A.; Gonyar, L.A.; Overballe-Petersen, S.; Stine, O.C.; et al. Redefining enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC): Genomic characterization of epidemiological EAEC strains. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ntui, C.M.; Fleckenstein, J.M.; Schubert, W.D. Structural and biophysical characterization of the secreted, beta-helical adhesin EtpA of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0287100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Greco, D.; Salmaso, S.; Mastrantonio, P.; Giuliano, M.; Tozzi, A.E.; Anemona, A.; Ciofi degli Atti, M.L.; Giammanco, A.; Panei, P.; Blackwelder, W.C.; et al. A controlled trial of two acellular vaccines and one whole-cell vaccine against pertussis. Progetto Pertosse Working Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Plotkin, S.A. Vaccines: Correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Plotkin, S.A. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2010, 17, 1055–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Plotkin, S.A.; Gilbert, P.B. Nomenclature for immune correlates of protection after vaccination. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 54, 1615–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pasetti, M.F.; Simon, J.K.; Sztein, M.B.; Levine, M.M. Immunology of gut mucosal vaccines. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 239, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Holmgren, J.; Parashar, U.D.; Plotkin, S.; Louis, J.; Ng, S.P.; Desauziers, E.; Picot, V.; Saadatian-Elahi, M. Correlates of protection for enteric vaccines. Vaccine 2017, 35, 3355–3363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rao, M.R.; Wierzba, T.F.; Savarino, S.J.; Abu-Elyazeed, R.; El-Ghoreb, N.; Hall, E.R.; Naficy, A.; Abdel-Messih, I.; Frenck, R.W., Jr.; Svennerholm, A.M.; et al. Serologic correlates of protection against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhea. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 191, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Clemens, J.D.; Svennerholm, A.M.; Harris, J.R.; Huda, S.; Rao, M.; Neogy, P.K.; Khan, M.R.; Ansaruzzaman, M.; Rahaman, S.; Ahmed, F.; et al. Seroepidemiologic evaluation of anti-toxic and anti-colonization factor immunity against infections by LT-producing Escherichia coli in rural Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 162, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Winter, A.K.; Martinez, M.E.; Cutts, F.T.; Moss, W.J.; Ferrari, M.J.; McKee, A.; Lessler, J.; Hayford, K.; Wallinga, J.; Metcalf, C.J.E. Benefits and Challenges in Using Seroprevalence Data to Inform Models for Measles and Rubella Elimination. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Durrheim, D. Measles Elimination, Immunity, Serosurveys, and Other Immunity Gap Diagnostic Tools. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Arnold, B.F.; Martin, D.L.; Juma, J.; Mkocha, H.; Ochieng, J.B.; Cooley, G.M.; Omore, R.; Goodhew, E.B.; Morris, J.F.; Costantini, V.; et al. Enteropathogen antibody dynamics and force of infection among children in low-resource settings. eLife 2019, 8, e45594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Arnold, B.F.; van der Laan, M.J.; Hubbard, A.E.; Steel, C.; Kubofcik, J.; Hamlin, K.L.; Moss, D.M.; Nutman, T.B.; Priest, J.W.; Lammie, P.J. Measuring changes in transmission of neglected tropical diseases, malaria, and enteric pathogens from quantitative antibody levels. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Charles, M.; Delva, G.G.; Boutin, J.; Severe, K.; Peck, M.; Mabou, M.M.; Wright, P.F.; Pape, J.W. Importance of cholera and other etiologies of acute diarrhea in post-earthquake Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Diaz, J.N.; Iannotti, L.L.; Louis Dulience, S.J.; Vie, S.; Jiang, X.; Grigura, V.; Boncy, J.; Pierre, F.J.M.; Kuhlmann, F.M. Prevalence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and impact on child health in Cap-Haitien, Haiti. PLoS Glob. Public Health 2023, 3, e0001863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lundgren, A.; Bourgeois, L.; Carlin, N.; Clements, J.; Gustafsson, B.; Hartford, M.; Holmgren, J.; Petzold, M.; Walker, R.; Svennerholm, A.M. Safety and immunogenicity of an improved oral inactivated multivalent enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) vaccine administered alone and together with dmLT adjuvant in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I study. Vaccine 2014, 32, 7077–7084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Qadri, F.; Akhtar, M.; Bhuiyan, T.R.; Chowdhury, M.I.; Ahmed, T.; Rafique, T.A.; Khan, A.; Rahman, S.I.A.; Khanam, F.; Lundgren, A.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the oral, inactivated, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine ETVAX in Bangladeshi children and infants: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 208–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Anu, K.; Marianna, R.; Sakari, J.T.; Pakkanen Sari, H.; Jukka-Pekka, P.; Anu, P.; Mari, E.; Tamim, K.; Peter, K.; Kati, M.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of ETVAX®, an oral inactivated vaccine against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea: A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial among Finnish travellers to Benin, West-Africa. J. Travel Med. 2023, taad045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Riddle, M.S.; Maciel, M., Jr.; Porter, C.K.; Poole, S.T.; Gutierrez, R.L.; Gormley, R.; Laird, R.M.; Sebeny, P.J.; Dori, K.E.; Greenleaf, M.E.; et al. A first in human clinical trial assessing the safety and immunogenicity of transcutaneously delivered enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli fimbrial tip adhesin with heat-labile enterotoxin with mutation R192G. Vaccine 2020, 38, 7040–7048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lee, T.; Gutierrez, R.L.; Maciel, M.; Poole, S.; Testa, K.J.; Trop, S.; Duplessis, C.; Lane, A.; Riddle, M.S.; Hamer, M.; et al. Safety and immunogenicity of intramuscularly administered CS6 subunit vaccine with a modified heat-labile enterotoxin from enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vaccine 2021, 39, 5548–5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Begum, Y.A.; Baby, N.I.; Faruque, A.S.; Jahan, N.; Cravioto, A.; Svennerholm, A.M.; Qadri, F. Shift in phenotypic characteristics of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolated from diarrheal patients in Bangladesh. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 11 02221 g001
Figure 1. Immune responses to EtpA, EatA and LT in diverse populations. Shown are kinetic ELISA (IgG, (A)) data (IgA, (B)) with geometric mean values represented by dashed horizontal lines. p * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001 (Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric testing). n.d. no data due to insufficient quantity of sera for analysis.
Figure 1. Immune responses to EtpA, EatA and LT in diverse populations. Shown are kinetic ELISA (IgG, (A)) data (IgA, (B)) with geometric mean values represented by dashed horizontal lines. p * < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001, **** < 0.0001 (Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric testing). n.d. no data due to insufficient quantity of sera for analysis.
Microorganisms 11 02221 g001
Table 1. Unadjusted mean differences in antibody response one month after exposure.
Table 1. Unadjusted mean differences in antibody response one month after exposure.
AntigenIsotypeAntigen
PresentAbsent
Change *NChangeNp-Value
EtpAIgG0.1360.121190.891
IgA0.040.140.689
EatAIgG0.086−0.051190.280
IgA0.320.010.034
LTIgG0.2020−0.021050.006
IgA−0.02−0.050.771
* Change is defined as the log10 (Vmax) response at follow-up subtracted from the baseline response.
Table 2. General linear model associating variables with immune response.
Table 2. General linear model associating variables with immune response.
AgeSymptomsAntigenSymptoms:Antigen *
EtpA IgG0.074p-value0.0080.0810.9450.045
η20.0580.0250.0000.033
EtpA IgA0.046p-value0.0210.4630.6410.347
η20.0430.0040.0020.007
EatA IgG †0.064p-value0.0130.5670.4290.709
η20.0510.0030.0050.001
EatA IgA0.072p-value0.1070.2320.0470.405
η20.0210.0120.0330.006
LT IgG0.223p-value0.0100.0010.0010.494
η20.0540.0960.0880.004
LT IgA †0.093p-value0.6300.0010.3630.006
η20.0020.0810.0070.062
* Significance of the interaction between symptoms and antigen immunogenicity. † Levene’s test of equality of variances is significant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kuhlmann, F.M.; Grigura, V.; Vickers, T.J.; Prouty, M.G.; Iannotti, L.L.; Dulience, S.J.L.; Fleckenstein, J.M. Seroprevalence Study of Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Antigens in Globally Diverse Populations. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092221

AMA Style

Kuhlmann FM, Grigura V, Vickers TJ, Prouty MG, Iannotti LL, Dulience SJL, Fleckenstein JM. Seroprevalence Study of Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Antigens in Globally Diverse Populations. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9):2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kuhlmann, Frederick Matthew, Vadim Grigura, Timothy J. Vickers, Michael G. Prouty, Lora L. Iannotti, Sherlie Jean Louis Dulience, and James M. Fleckenstein. 2023. "Seroprevalence Study of Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Antigens in Globally Diverse Populations" Microorganisms 11, no. 9: 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092221

APA Style

Kuhlmann, F. M., Grigura, V., Vickers, T. J., Prouty, M. G., Iannotti, L. L., Dulience, S. J. L., & Fleckenstein, J. M. (2023). Seroprevalence Study of Conserved Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Antigens in Globally Diverse Populations. Microorganisms, 11(9), 2221. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop