This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Explainable Prediction of UHPC Tensile Strength Using Machine Learning with Engineered Features and Multi-Algorithm Comparative Evaluation
by
Zhe Zhang
Zhe Zhang 1
,
Tianqin Zeng
Tianqin Zeng 1,
Yongge Zeng
Yongge Zeng
Yongge Zeng received his M.S. in bridge and tunnel engineering from Changsha University of and He [...]
Yongge Zeng received his M.S. in bridge and tunnel engineering from Changsha University of Science and Technology in 2007. He works as an associate professor at the School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Shaoyang University (2010–to date). His research topics mainly include civil engineering, machine learning, UHPC, and slope support. As first author, his work in civil engineering has resulted in two SCI-indexed papers and one EI-indexed paper. Email: 3226@hnsyu.edu.cn
2,* and
Ping Zhu
Ping Zhu 3
1
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China
2
School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, University of Shaoyang, Shaoyang 422000, China
3
National Key Laboratory of Bridge Safety and Resilience, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Buildings 2025, 15(17), 3217; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173217 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 July 2025
/
Revised: 4 September 2025
/
Accepted: 4 September 2025
/
Published: 6 September 2025
Abstract
To explore a direct predictive model for the tensile strength of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC), machine learning (ML) algorithms are presented. Initially, a database comprising 178 samples of UHPC tensile strength with varying parameters is established. Then, feature engineering strategies are proposed to optimize the robustness of ML models under a small-sample condition. Further, the performance and efficiency of algorithms are compared under default hyperparameters and hyperparameter tuning, respectively. Moreover, the utilization of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) enables the analysis of the relationships between UHPC tensile strength and its influencing factors. The quantitative analysis results indicate that ensemble algorithms exhibit superior performance, indicated by R² values of above 0.92, under default hyperparameters. After hyperparameter tuning, both conventional and ensemble models achieve R² values exceeding 0.94. However, Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) consistently demonstrates a suboptimal performance, irrespective of hyperparameter tuning. Notably, Categorical Boosting (CatBoost) requires a substantial duration of 1208 s, which is notably more time-consuming than that of other algorithms. The most influential feature identified is fiber reinforcement index with a contribution of 37.5%, followed by the water-to-cement ratio, strain rate, and cross-sectional size. The nonlinear relationship between UHPC tensile strength and the top four factors is visualized, and the critical thresholds are identified.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Zhang, Z.; Zeng, T.; Zeng, Y.; Zhu, P.
Explainable Prediction of UHPC Tensile Strength Using Machine Learning with Engineered Features and Multi-Algorithm Comparative Evaluation. Buildings 2025, 15, 3217.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173217
AMA Style
Zhang Z, Zeng T, Zeng Y, Zhu P.
Explainable Prediction of UHPC Tensile Strength Using Machine Learning with Engineered Features and Multi-Algorithm Comparative Evaluation. Buildings. 2025; 15(17):3217.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173217
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zhang, Zhe, Tianqin Zeng, Yongge Zeng, and Ping Zhu.
2025. "Explainable Prediction of UHPC Tensile Strength Using Machine Learning with Engineered Features and Multi-Algorithm Comparative Evaluation" Buildings 15, no. 17: 3217.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173217
APA Style
Zhang, Z., Zeng, T., Zeng, Y., & Zhu, P.
(2025). Explainable Prediction of UHPC Tensile Strength Using Machine Learning with Engineered Features and Multi-Algorithm Comparative Evaluation. Buildings, 15(17), 3217.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15173217
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.