Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
#MeToo? Legal Discourse and Everyday Responses to Sexual Violence
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
All Their Eggs in One Basket? Ideological Congruence in Congress and the Bicameral Origins of Concentrated Delegation to the Bureaucracy
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Judicialization and Its Effects: Experiments as a Way Forward

Department of History and Government, Texas Woman’s University, P.O. Box 425889, CFO 605, Denton, TX 76204, USA
Received: 16 February 2018 / Revised: 1 May 2018 / Accepted: 16 May 2018 / Published: 18 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intersection between Law, Politics and Public Policy)
Full-Text   |   PDF [366 KB, uploaded 18 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

Law and courts play a larger role in American policymaking than in similar countries—and a larger role than ever before in American politics. However, systematic efforts to evaluate the effects of judicialized policymaking are consistently plagued by problems of causal inference. Experiments offer a way forward. Causal claims by public law scholars are often undercut by validity difficulties that are avoidable if scholars engaging in observational research incorporate the tenets of experiments in their research designs, as well as if more public law scholars attempted to isolate the effects of judicialization in controlled settings, such as survey or laboratory experiments. An original survey experiment on the effects of media reporting on tort reform suggests that experiments have much to offer public law scholars. Despite certain challenges in implementation, experiments and observational research based on experiments provide a promising path for assessing the varied—and important—effects of judicialized policymaking. View Full-Text
Keywords: judicialization; framing; experiments; media judicialization; framing; experiments; media
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hevron, P. Judicialization and Its Effects: Experiments as a Way Forward. Laws 2018, 7, 20.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Laws EISSN 2075-471X Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top