3.1. Microstructure Analysis of TiAl Alloy Sheet After Rolling
During the pack rolling process, TiAl alloys experience different stress conditions in the center and edge regions, with the edge region being more susceptible to temperature drops due to contact with stainless steel. Therefore, it is important to investigate the microstructure of TiAl alloys in these regions after rolling deformation.
Figure 2a shows the microstructure of the edge region of the R7. It can be observed that most of the γ/α
2 lamellae are preserved, with the lamellae being twisted and bent. A small amount of spherical β phase and γ phase particles are present around the γ/α
2 lamellae, indicating that dynamic recrystallization has occurred at the lamellae interfaces.
Figure 2b shows the microstructure of the central region of the R7 sheet, which mainly consists of equiaxed γ, α
2, and β phases, along with residual γ/α
2 lamellae. The volume fraction of γ/α
2 lamellae in the central region is significantly lower than that in the edge region. Compared to the edge region, the microstructure in the central region is more uniform and exhibits finer grains. Compared to the microstructures obtained after Gleeble-3500 thermal simulation of compression at 1200 °C by our research group, the rolled-and-deformed microstructure contains a higher proportion of γ/α
2 lamellae and a larger number of equiaxed recrystallized γ phase particles. In contrast, fewer recrystallized α
2 phase particles are present [
5,
19]. This is primarily due to the larger strain rate and higher lnZ (Zener–Hollomon) value during pack rolling [
20], which promote dynamic recrystallization within the sheet layer. The appearance of a large number of equiaxed recrystallized γ phase particles can be explained as follows: Pn one hand, the 15-min holding after each rolling pass provides sufficient time for recrystallized grains to grow, leading to the formation of equiaxed γ phase particles. On the other hand, the holding also helps release the stresses generated during the rolling process, which inhibits the γ→α
2 phase transformation, resulting in a lower content of α
2 phase.
Figure 3 presents the EBSD phase map and the corresponding inverse pole figure (IPF) of the central region in the R7 sheet. The phase map in
Figure 3a reveals that the microstructure comprises γ (green, 80.0%), β (blue, 16.1%), and α
2 (red, 3.9%) phases. This represents a change of −4.3%, +5.1%, and −0.8% for the γ, β, and α
2 phases, respectively, compared to the hot-isostatic-pressed (HIPed) state. Notably, the rolling deformation leads to an increase in β phase content but a decrease in both α
2 and γ phases. Dynamic recrystallization refines the equiaxed γ, β, and α
2 phases to average grain sizes of 4.9 μm, 6.2 μm, and 5.6 μm, respectively. The refinement occurs because DRX nucleation (via grain boundary bulging in the γ-phase or sub-grain rotation in the α
2-phase) creates new fine grains. In TiAl alloys with low stacking fault energy, dynamic recovery is limited, leading to high dislocation densities that promote extensive DRX nucleation. These equiaxed phases are uniformly dispersed around the residual γ/α
2 lamellae. Additionally, annealing twins are observed within the γ phase, as indicated by the arrows in
Figure 3a. The IPF map in
Figure 3b shows a residual γ/α
2 lamella within the boxed area, exhibiting a consistent crystallographic orientation throughout. The arrows inside the box point to coarse γ phase laths (identified by correlating with
Figure 3a) that have grown via recrystallization and exhibit orientations differing from the surrounding lamella. In contrast, the black-circled area exhibits highly scattered orientations, indicating the formation of numerous new, fine grains within the lamellae, many of which are submicron-sized (<1 μm). Both the boxed and circled regions in
Figure 3b correspond to residual γ/α
2 lamellae from
Figure 3a. However, they exhibit markedly different degrees of recrystallization due to localized variations in deformation strain. In the circled region, the lamellae experienced more severe deformation, leading to a higher degree of recrystallization, partial fragmentation, and decomposition.
Figure 4 presents a comparative analysis of the microstructures in the edge and center regions of the R11 sheet following the rolling process. As shown in
Figure 4a, the edge region of the R11 sheet exhibits wedge-shaped cracks and intergranular pores. The pronounced divergence in grain flow directions on either side of these cracks (highlighted by red arrows) signifies that cracking initiated from inhomogeneous deformation at the microgranular level. The formation of these defects is attributed to two synergistic factors. Firstly, the substantial total reduction (83.0% for R11 vs. 69.8% for R7) induces severe deformation and localized flow instability in the edge region. Secondly, the thinner pack resulting from higher reduction accelerates heat dissipation during rolling, leading to a greater temperature drop. This temperature decrease markedly reduces the alloy’s plasticity, and the combined effect of lower temperature and higher strain promotes crack initiation and propagation. In stark contrast, the center region (
Figure 4b) is nearly devoid of lamellar structures and consists predominantly of a uniform dispersion of equiaxed γ, β, and α
2 phases. This homogeneous microstructure indicates that dynamic recrystallization was extensive and complete in the center, where thermal conditions were more stable and deformation was more uniform than at the edges.
Figure 5 presents a comprehensive EBSD analysis of the center region of the R11 sheet, detailing the phase constitution and the grain boundary character distribution. The phase map in
Figure 5a quantifies the phase fractions as 60.6% γ, 29.9% β, and 9.4% α
2. A comparative analysis with the R7 sheet reveals that the increased total reduction of 83.0% in the R11 sheet promotes phase transformations, leading to a decrease in γ phase content accompanied by an increase in both the β and α
2 phase contents. The near-doubling of β phase content from R7 (16.1%) to R11 (29.9%) is attributed to the higher rolling reduction. The greater deformation in R11 promotes a more extensive γ→β phase transformation due to increased defect density and stored energy. Simultaneously, the associated faster cooling helps suppress the β→α transformation during cooling, leading to greater retention of the metastable β phase at room temperature. The grain boundary misorientation distribution map in
Figure 5b delineates low-angle grain boundaries (LAGBs, 2–5°, in red), medium-angle grain boundaries (MAGBs, 5–15°, in green), and high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs, 15–90°, in blue). A predominant presence of blue HAGBs within the γ phase regions provides direct evidence of extensive dynamic recrystallization (DRX) [
21,
22]. This is because the transformation of subgrain boundaries (LAGBs) into HAGBs through the absorption of dislocations is the fundamental mechanism behind DRX. The high density of HAGBs indicates that the rolling process, with its larger strain rate, provided sufficient driving force for complete recrystallization, resulting in a refined microstructure of equiaxed grains.
Owing to its high volume fraction, the γ phase undergoes extensive dynamic recrystallization (DRX), which dominates the deformation mechanism during the rolling of TiAl alloy sheets. Moreover, the formation of annealing twins within the γ phase is evident, as clearly revealed in the TEM micrograph of
Figure 6a. These twins contribute to strain accommodation during the deformation and subsequent grain growth. The critical role of the β-phase in coordinating deformation is further elucidated by the dislocation configurations observed via TEM in
Figure 6b. The presence of dislocations within the β phase (B2 structure) confirms its capacity to accommodate plastic strain by slip, thereby enhancing the overall workability of the alloy by mitigating stress concentrations at the γ/β interfaces [
23].
A comparison of the microstructure between the R7 and R11 sheets reveals that the amount of residual γ/α2 lamellae in the TiAl alloys decreases with increasing deformation. This phenomenon is attributed to the large reduction, which promotes dynamic recrystallization, thereby crushing and decomposing the lamellae. In the R7 specimen, due to insufficient deformation, recrystallization was incomplete, resulting in the retention of some lamellar colonies. Regarding microstructural uniformity, the R7 sheet exhibits minimal differences between its edge and center regions due to limited deformation. In contrast, the R11 sheet develops edge cracks in the edge region owing to significant deformation and an associated temperature drop. Meanwhile, the center region of the R11 sheet undergoes sufficient recrystallization, resulting in a fine and uniform microstructure.
3.2. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Microstructure of TiAl Alloy Sheets
The β/B2 phase in TiAl alloys can negatively impact mechanical properties such as creep resistance and fatigue performance during high-temperature service [
24,
25]. Therefore, a suitable heat treatment is essential for hot-rolled TiAl alloy sheets. The objective of this heat treatment is to minimize the β/B2 phase content and achieve a microstructure with uniform, fine lamellae.
Figure 7 presents the microstructure of the R7 sheet after being held at 1150, 1250, and 1350 °C for 1 h, followed by air cooling. As shown in
Figure 7a, after holding at 1150 °C, the microstructure primarily consists of equiaxed γ, α
2, and β phases, with the lamellar structure being essentially absent. At 1250 °C, the microstructure transforms from the initial rolled state into a lamellar structure, with a few free β phase particles distributed along the lamellar boundaries. At this temperature, the average lamellar size is 25.7 μm. When the temperature is further increased to 1350 °C, only coarse lamellar structures, ranging from 50 to 100 μm in size, are observed, along with the presence of white deviatoric bands in the microstructure.
Figure 8 shows the microstructure of the R11 sheet after heat treatment at different temperatures. From
Figure 8a, it is evident that, compared to the rolled state, the deformation traces and elongation have largely disappeared after heat treatment at 1150 °C, and the content of the α
2 phase has increased significantly. After heat treatment at 1250 °C, the microstructure primarily consists of γ/α
2 lamellae (with an average colony size of 21.7 μm) and β phase grains distributed along the lamellar boundaries. The β phase appears “embedded” within the γ phase present at the boundaries. Compared to the as-rolled condition, the β phase content is significantly reduced. After heat treatment at 1350 °C, the microstructure is composed mainly of coarse γ/α
2 lamellae, with an average colony size ranging from 50 to 80 μm, and β phase grains are sparsely distributed around them. Compared to the R7 sheet, the R11 sheet develops a finer lamellar structure after heat treatment. This is attributed to the greater deformation endured by the R11 sheet, which results in a higher density of dislocations and defects. These defects provide additional nucleation sites for recrystallization, leading to a finer microstructure. The rapid coarsening of the lamellae in both the R7 and R11 sheets during heat treatment at 1350 °C is primarily due to the high temperature and abnormal grain growth occurring in the α-single phase region. In contrast, during heat treatment at 1250 °C (
Figure 8b), lamellar growth is less pronounced because the temperature is below the α-transus temperature, and the α
2 and γ phases mutually pin each other, inhibiting the coarsening of the γ/α
2 lamellae.
Based on the results of heat treatments at different temperatures, the treatment at 1250 °C was found to be most effective in reducing the β/B2 phase content. To further control the β/B2 phase content, a cyclic heat treatment process at 1250 °C was employed. This cyclic heat treatment was performed exclusively on the R11 sheet because it exhibited a finer initial microstructure after conventional heat treatment compared to the R7 sheet.
Figure 9 presents the microstructural evolution of the R11 sheet subjected to varying numbers of cyclic heat treatments. The β phase content was measured to be 11.7%, 5.2%, and 4.1% after 3, 6, and 9 cycles, respectively. Evidently, the β phase content decreases with an increasing number of cycles. Additionally, the size of the γ/α
2 lamellae initially increased and then decreased as the number of thermal cycles increased. The β phase, distributed at the lamellar boundaries, acts as a pinning agent, inhibiting the growth of the lamellae. When the number of cycles increased from 3 to 6, the significant reduction in β phase content weakened its pinning effect, consequently allowing the lamellae to coarsen. However, as the number of cycles increased further from 6 to 9, the reduction in β phase content became less pronounced. Nevertheless, the continued cyclic treatment promoted recrystallization nucleation, which became the dominant mechanism for microstructural refinement, leading to a decrease in lamellar size. This observation is consistent with the work of Luo [
26], who refined the microstructure of Ta-containing TiAl alloys via cyclic heat treatment and identified two refinement mechanisms: phase boundary α-nucleation and grain boundary α-nucleation. The refinement observed in our study at high cycle numbers may involve similar mechanisms.
Figure 10 presents the TEM morphology of the R11 sheet after 3 and 9 cycles of heat treatment. In
Figure 10a, the γ, β, and α
2 grains surrounding the lamellae are clearly visible. Notably, fine γ/α
2 lamellar colonies can be observed inside the α
2 grains, as highlighted by the red rectangle. The β phase preferentially transforms into the α phase following the expulsion of Ti and absorption of Al, as these two phases are chemically similar, facilitating a rapid compositional change. Subsequently, these α phases transform into γ/α
2 lamellae during cooling.
Figure 10b presents the TEM morphology after 9 cycles of heat treatment. It can be observed that equiaxed microstructures are almost absent at the lamellar boundaries. A smaller lamellar colony, approximately 2 μm in size, is visible between two larger colonies. This likely represents a lamellar colony whose growth was incomplete following the elimination of the β phase. Analysis of the TEM images (
Figure 10) indicates that the interlamellar spacing of the γ/α
2 lamellae after nine cycles was approximately 100 nm, significantly smaller than that in the hot-isostatically pressed condition (338 ± 16 nm). During the cyclic heat treatment at 1250 °C, which is slightly above the γ-solvus temperature (T
γsolve, 1247 °C), the microstructure was in a critical state within the α-phase region. During the cooling segment of each cycle, fine γ laths precipitated from the α-phase, concurrent with the α → α
2 ordering reaction, leading to the formation of the γ/α
2 lamellar structure. In summary, the elimination mechanism of the β phase follows the sequence β → α → γ + α
2. This process is collectively driven by the distortion energy and defects introduced by rolling deformation, along with the high temperature and cyclic thermal stresses during heat treatment.
3.3. Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mechanism of TiAl Alloys
Figure 11 shows the tensile property curves of the TiAl alloy sheets at room temperature and high temperature after nine heat treatment cycles at 1250 °C. At room temperature, the alloy exhibited a tensile strength of 676.4 MPa and an elongation of 1.43%. Compared with the hot-isostatically pressed (before the hot pack-rolling) TiAl alloy, the heat-treated sheet showed increases of 90.7 MPa (15.5%) in tensile strength and 0.11% (8.3%) in elongation. These enhancements are attributed to two main factors. First, the heat treatment resulted in a nearly fully lamellar microstructure with substantially reduced contents of the β and γ phases. This fully lamellar structure possesses high intrinsic strength due to its ordered arrangement. Second, the rolling and heat treatment processes refined the γ/α
2 lamellae, reducing their size from about 40–50 μm to 20–30 μm. This refinement improves plasticity by facilitating more uniform deformation at the lamellar interfaces.
The tensile strengths of the TiAl alloy sheets at 650 °C, 750 °C, and 850 °C were measured as 653.7 MPa, 498.1 MPa, and 301.3 MPa, respectively. The corresponding elongations were 6.8%, 17.5%, and 41.2%. This indicates that the tensile strength decreases while the elongation increases with increasing temperature. The primary reason for this trend is that the thermal activation energy for deformation decreases at elevated temperatures. This reduction facilitates dislocation glide, climb, and twin formation, thereby enabling more extensive plastic deformation. The experimental results reported by Xu et al. [
27]. indicate a yield strength ranging from 416 to 440 MPa and an elongation between 7.5% and 11.7%. In contrast, the alloy investigated in this study demonstrates an approximately 11% increase in yield strength and an approximately 80% improvement in elongation compared to those values.
To investigate the fracture mechanism of the TiAl alloy during tensile deformation, its fracture behavior after room-temperature and high-temperature tests was analyzed, as shown in
Figure 12.
Figure 12a reveals that the room-temperature tensile fracture exhibits characteristics of brittle fracture, involving a mixture of trans-lamellar, inter-lamellar, and inter-granular cracking. In
Figure 12b, the small facet in the upper-left corner corresponds to an inter-lamellar fracture, where the crack propagates rapidly along the direction parallel to the γ/α
2 lamellae, resulting in a smooth and flat fracture surface. The central region of
Figure 12b shows inter-granular fracture, where the crack extends along the interfaces of the γ/α
2 lamellae. At this stage, the bending and deflection of the interfaces at their intersections dissipate the crack propagation energy, thereby inhibiting further crack advancement. Previous research [
28,
29] has indicated that the propagation rate of inter-lamellar cracks is closely related to the lamellar size in TiAl alloys. When the lamellae are relatively coarse, the number of lamellar interfaces and intersections per unit volume is reduced. Consequently, the crack propagation rate along the inter-granular path increases. Conversely, in alloys with finer lamellae, a higher density of interfaces exists per unit volume. As the crack advances, it encounters greater resistance at the interfacial intersections, effectively slowing its propagation. This mechanism ultimately enhances the alloy’s plasticity.
Figure 12c illustrates the characteristics of a trans-lamellar fracture, where the crack propagates obliquely through the γ/α
2 lamellae in a step-like manner.
Figure 12d shows the fracture morphology of the TiAl alloy after high-temperature tensile deformation at 850 °C, which is characterized by numerous dimples, indicating a ductile fracture mode.
In general, the propagation rate of trans-lamellar cracks is inversely related to the lamellar spacing. Smaller spacing increases the number of γ/α
2 interfaces that a crack must traverse per unit advance, thereby enhancing the resistance to crack growth, as illustrated in
Figure 13. Additionally, trans-lamellar cracking is favored when the angle between the lamellae and the tensile axis is 40–50°, a phenomenon also observed during the hot compression of a Ti-44Al-4Nb-1Mo alloy [
19]. This can be explained by resolving the applied tensile/compressive force into components parallel (
F1) and perpendicular (
F2) to the lamellae. The component
F1 drives crack propagation along the interfaces, while
F2 provides the energy to overcome interfacial resistance and propagate the crack through the lamellae. At an orientation angle of 40–50°,
F1 and
F2 are balanced, facilitating continuous crack propagation. After cyclic heat treatment, the refined lamellar size and spacing in the TiAl alloy reduce the crack propagation rate, thereby improving the alloy’s resistance to crack extension.
To further investigate the fracture mechanism of the TiAl alloy, the region adjacent to the tensile deformation zone was analyzed, as shown in
Figure 14.
Figure 14a reveals the presence of multiple cracks. Here, labels “1”, “2”, and “3” denote inter-lamellar, trans-lamellar, and inter-granular cracks, respectively. The series of small cracks labeled “1+2+1+2” in the central area can be collectively considered as a larger trans-lamellar crack (see the red circle).
Figure 14b shows the microstructure within the γ/α
2 lamellae at 20,000× magnification, where inter-lamellar cracks are seen propagating along the γ/α
2 interfaces (gray: γ lamellae; bright white: α
2 lamellae). TEM analysis of the lamellar region (
Figure 14c) confirms that the wider, dark lamellae are the γ phase, while the adjacent, thinner lamellae are the α
2 phase. Within the γ lamellae, dislocations and twins are present simultaneously. High-density dislocation pile-ups are evident at the γ/α
2 interfaces, forming dislocation walls. The incompatible deformation between the γ and α
2 phases at these interfaces induces significant stress concentration, readily promoting crack initiation, as indicated by the arrow in
Figure 14d. Kabir [
30] investigated the room-temperature tensile fracture behavior of a TNB alloy heat-treated at 1230–1300 °C and found that cracks primarily initiated at γ grain boundaries, γ/α
2 phase boundaries, and the intersections between lamellae and grains. This was attributed to the directional mismatch between individual grains and grain clusters, leading to localized stress concentrations that ultimately resulted in microcracking at the interfaces between the lamellae and spheroidized grains. Regarding crack propagation, as demonstrated in the literature [
31], when a crack encounters lamellar bundles within the alloy, its progress is hindered. For the crack to continue advancing, it must either propagate along the interface between the lamellar bundles and the matrix (inter-granular cracking), traverse through the lamellar bundles (trans-lamellar cracking), or initiate a new crack in the γ matrix on the opposite side to release energy. These processes either elongate the crack path or require greater energy, thereby increasing the difficulty of crack extension. In conclusion, the fracture of the alloy after thermal cycling exhibits a mixed mode, involving inter-lamellar, trans-lamellar, and inter-granular cracking. Among these, interlamellar cracking originates from dislocation pile-up at the γ/α
2 interfaces within the lamellar structure.